Stereoelectroencephalography in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Comparison of 2 Robotic Systems for Pediatric Stereoelectroencephalography Implantation

BACKGROUND

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) remains critical in guiding epilepsy surgery. Robot-assisted techniques have shown promise in improving SEEG implantation outcomes but have not been directly compared. In this single-institution series, we compared ROSA and Stealth AutoGuide robots in pediatric SEEG implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 21 sequential pediatric SEEG implantations consisting of 6 ROSA and 15 AutoGuide procedures. We determined mean operative time, time per electrode, root mean square (RMS) registration error, and surgical complications. Three-dimensional radial distances were calculated between each electrode's measured entry and target points with respective errors from the planned trajectory line.

RESULTS

Mean overall/per electrode operating time was 73.5/7.5 minutes for ROSA and 126.1/10.9 minutes for AutoGuide (P = 0.030 overall, P = 0.082 per electrode). Mean RMS registration error was 0.77 mm (0.55-0.93 mm) for ROSA and 0.6 mm (0.2-1.0 mm) for AutoGuide (P = 0.26). No procedures experienced complications. The mean radial (entry point error was 1.23 ± 0.11 mm for ROSA and 2.65 ± 0.12 mm for AutoGuide (P < 0.001), while the mean radial target point error was 1.86 ± 0.15 mm for ROSA and 3.25 ± 0.16 mm for AutoGuide (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall operative time was greater for AutoGuide procedures, although there was no statistically significant difference in time per electrode. Both systems are highly accurate with no significant RMS error difference. While the ROSA robot yielded significantly lower entry and target point errors, both robots are safe and reliable for deep electrode insertion in pediatric epilepsy.

Learn how to interpret and use intracranial EEG findings

Epilepsy surgery is the therapy of choice for many patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Recognizing and describing ictal and interictal patterns with intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings is important in order to most efficiently leverage advantages of this technique to accurately delineate the seizure-onset zone before undergoing surgery. In this seminar in epileptology, we address learning objective "1.4.11 Recognize and describe ictal and interictal patterns with intracranial recordings" of the International League against Epilepsy curriculum for epileptologists. We will review principal considerations of the implantation planning, summarize the literature for the most relevant ictal and interictal EEG patterns within and beyond the Berger frequency spectrum, review invasive stimulation for seizure and functional mapping, discuss caveats in the interpretation of intracranial EEG findings, provide an overview on special considerations in children and in subdural grids/strips, and review available quantitative/signal analysis approaches. To be as practically oriented as possible, we will provide a mini atlas of the most frequent EEG patterns, highlight pearls for its not infrequently challenging interpretation, and conclude with two illustrative case examples. This article shall serve as a useful learning resource for trainees in clinical neurophysiology/epileptology by providing a basic understanding on the concepts of invasive intracranial EEG.

Expanding eligibility for intracranial electroencephalography using Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride in children with behavioral dyscontrol

INTRODUCTION

Invasive intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG) is advantageous for identifying epileptogenic foci in pediatric patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Patients with behavioral challenges due to autism, intellectual disabilities, and hyperactivity have greater difficulty tolerating prolonged IEEG recording and risk injuring themselves or others. There is a need for therapies that increase the safety of IEEG but do not interfere with IEEG recording or prolong hospitalization. Dexmedetomidine Hydrochloride's (DH) use has been reported to improve safety in patients with behavioral challenges during routine surface EEG recording but has not been characterized during IEEG. Here we evaluated DH administration in pediatric patients undergoing IEEG to assess its safety and impact on the IEEG recordings.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified all pediatric patients undergoing IEEG between January 2016 and September 2022. Patient demographics, DH administration, DH dose, hospital duration, and IEEG seizure data were analyzed. The number of seizures recorded for each patient was divided by the days each patient was monitored with IEEG. The total number of seizures, as well as seizures per day, were compared between DH and non-DH patients via summary statistics, multivariable linear regression, and univariate analysis. Other data were compared across groups with univariate statistics.

RESULTS

Eighty-four pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen (21.4 %) received DH treatment during their IEEG recording. There were no statistical differences between the DH and non-DH groups' demographic data, length of hospital stays, or seizure burden. Non-DH patients had a median age of 12.0 years (interquartile range: 7.25-15.00), while DH-receiving patients had a median age of 8.0 years old (interquartile range: 3.00-13.50) (p = 0.07). The non-DH cohort was 57.6 % male, and the DH cohort was 50.0 % male (p = 0.76). The median length of IEEG recordings was 5.0 days (interquartile range: 4.00-6.25) for DH patients versus 6.0 days (interquartile range: 4.00-8.00) for non-DH patients (p = 0.25). Median total seizures recorded in the non-DH group was 8.0 (interquartile range: 5.00-13.25) versus 15.0 in the DH group (interquartile range: 5.00-22.25) (p = 0.33). Median total seizures per day of IEEG monitoring were comparable across groups: 1.50 (interquartile range: 0.65-3.17) for non-DH patients compared to 2.83 (interquartile range: 0.89-4.35) (p = 0.25) for those who received DH. Lastly, non-DH patients were hospitalized for a median of 8.0 days (interquartile range: 6.00-11.25), while DH patients had a median length of stay of 7.00 days (interquartile range: 5.00-8.25) (p = 0.27). No adverse events were reported because of DH administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of DH was not associated with adverse events. Additionally, the frequency of seizures captured on the IEEG, as well as the duration of hospitalization, were not significantly different between patients receiving and not receiving DH during IEEG. Incorporating DH into the management of patients with behavioral dyscontrol and intractable epilepsy may expand the use of IEEG to patients who previously could not tolerate it, improve safety, and preserve epileptic activity during the recording period.

Accuracy of Depth Electrodes is Not Time-Dependent in Robot-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography in a Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is steadily supplanting traditional frameless and frame-based modalities for minimally invasive depth electrode placement in epilepsy workup. Accuracy rates similar to gold-standard frame-based techniques have been achieved, with improved operative efficiency. Limitations in cranial fixation and placement of trajectories in pediatric patients are believed to contribute to a time-dependent accumulation of stereotactic error. Thus, we aim to study the impact of time as a marker of cumulative stereotactic error during robotic sEEG.

METHODS

All patients between October 2018 and June 2022 who underwent robotic sEEG were included. Radial errors at entry and target points as well as depth and Euclidean distance errors were collected for each electrode, excluding those with errors over 10 mm. Target point errors were standardized by planned trajectory length. ANOVA and error rates over time were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients met inclusion criteria for a total of 539 trajectories. Number of electrodes placed ranged from 6 to 22. Average root mean squared error was 0.45 ± 0.12 mm. Average entry, target, depth, and Euclidean distance errors were 1.12 ± 0.41 mm, 1.46 ± 0.44 mm, -1.06 ± 1.43 mm, and 3.01 ± 0.71 mm, respectively. There was no significant increased error with each sequential electrode placed (entry error P -value = .54, target error P -value = .13, depth error P -value = .22, Euclidean distance P -value = .27).

CONCLUSION

No decremental accuracy over time was observed. This may be secondary to our workflow which prioritizes oblique and longer trajectories first and then into less error-prone trajectories. Further study on the effect of level of training may reveal a novel difference in error rates.

Stereoelectroencephalography followed by combined electrode removal and MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy or open resection: a single-center series in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) have emerged as safe, effective, and less invasive alternatives to subdural grid placement and open resection, respectively, for the localization and treatment of medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) in children. Reported pediatric experience combining these complementary techniques is limited, with traditional workflows separating electrode removal and ablation/resection. The authors describe the largest reported series of pediatric epilepsy patients who underwent MRgLITT following SEEG contrasted with a cohort that underwent craniotomy following SEEG, combining ablation/resection with electrode explantation as standard practice.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients with MRE who had undergone SEEG followed by MRgLITT or open resection/disconnection at Boston Children's Hospital between November 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcome variables included surgical complication rates, length of hospital stay following treatment, and Engel classification at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 74 SEEG patients, 27 (median age 12.1 years, 63% female) underwent MRgLITT and 47 (median age 12.1 years, 49% female) underwent craniotomy. Seventy patients (95%) underwent SEEG followed by combined electrode removal and treatment. Eight MRgLITT cases (30%) and no open cases targeted the insula (p < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ, although trends toward more subdural/epidural hematomas, infarcts, and permanent unanticipated neurological deficits were evident following craniotomy, whereas a trend toward more temporary unanticipated neurological deficits was seen following MRgLITT. The median duration of hospitalization after treatment was 3 and 5 days for MRgLITT and open cases, respectively (p = 0.078). Seizure outcomes were similar between the cohorts, with 74% of MRgLITT and craniotomy patients attaining Engel class I or II outcomes (p = 0.386) at the last follow-up (median 1.1 and 1.9 years, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

MRgLITT and open resection following SEEG can both effectively treat MRE in pediatric patients and generally can be performed in a two-surgery workflow during a single hospitalization. In appropriately selected patients, MRgLITT tended to be associated with shorter hospitalizations and fewer complications following treatment and may be best suited for focal deep-seated targets associated with relatively challenging open surgical approaches.

Stereoelectroencephalography before 2 years of age

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a widely used technique for localizing seizure onset zones prior to resection. However, its use has traditionally been avoided in children under 2 years of age because of concerns regarding pin fixation in the immature skull, intraoperative and postoperative electrode bolt security, and stereotactic registration accuracy. In this retrospective study, the authors describe their experience using SEEG in patients younger than 2 years of age, with a focus on the procedure’s safety, feasibility, and accuracy as well as surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children under 2 years of age who had undergone SEEG while at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia between November 2017 and July 2021 was performed. Data on clinical characteristics, surgical procedure, imaging results, electrode accuracy measurements, and postoperative outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Five patients younger than 2 years of age underwent SEEG during the study period (median age 20 months, range 17–23 months). The mean age at seizure onset was 9 months. Developmental delay was present in all patients, and epilepsy-associated genetic diagnoses included tuberous sclerosis (n = 1), KAT6B (n = 1), and NPRL3 (n = 1). Cortical lesions included tubers from tuberous sclerosis (n = 1), mesial temporal sclerosis (n = 1), and cortical dysplasia (n = 3). The mean number of placed electrodes was 11 (range 6–20 electrodes). Bilateral electrodes were placed in 1 patient. Seizure onset zones were identified in all cases. There were no SEEG-related complications, including skull fracture, electrode misplacement, hemorrhage, infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, electrode pullout, neurological deficit, or death. The mean target point error for all electrodes was 1.0 mm. All patients proceeded to resective surgery, with a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 8–53 months). All patients attained a favorable epilepsy outcome, including Engel class IA (n = 2), IC (n = 1), ID (n = 1), and IIA (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG can be safely, accurately, and effectively utilized in children under age 2 with good postoperative outcomes using standard SEEG equipment. With minimal modification, this procedure is feasible in those with immature skulls and guides the epilepsy team’s decision-making for early and optimal treatment of refractory epilepsy through effective localization of seizure onset zones.

Virtual reality-based 3-dimensional localization of stereotactic EEG (SEEG) depth electrodes and related brain anatomy in pediatric epilepsy surgery

INTRODUCTION

The increasing use of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in the USA and the need for three-dimensional (3D) appreciation of complex spatial relationships between implanted stereotactic EEG depth electrodes and surrounding brain and cerebral vasculature are a challenge to clinicians who are used to two-dimensional (2D) appreciation of cortical anatomy having been traditionally trained on 2D radiologic imaging. Virtual reality and its 3D renderings have grown increasingly common in the multifaceted practice of neurosurgery. However, there exists a paucity in the literature regarding this emerging technology in its utilization of epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

An IRB-approved, single-center retrospective study identifying all SEEG pediatric patients in which virtual reality was applied was observed.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients identified who underwent an SEEG procedure, 43.5% (20/46) had a 3D rendering (3DR) of their SEEG depth electrodes. All 3DRs were used during patient-family education and discussion among the Epilepsy multidisciplinary team meetings, while 35% (7/20) were used during neuronavigation in surgery. Three successful representative cases of its application were presented.

DISCUSSION

Our institution's experience regarding virtual reality in the 3D representation of SEEG depth electrodes and the application to pre-surgical planning, patient-family education, multidisciplinary communication, and intraoperative neuronavigation demonstrate its applicability in comprehensive epilepsy patient care.

Delayed hemorrhage after pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: delayed occurrence or delayed diagnosis?

BACKGROUND

Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is a well-known invasive diagnostic method for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Its rate of complications is relatively low, being the intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) the most relevant. Most centers perform immediate imaging studies after SEEG to rule out complications. However, delayed intracranial hemorrhages (DIH) can occur despite normal imaging studies in the immediate postoperative period.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of DRE pediatric patients operated on SEEG between April 2016 and December 2020 in our institution. After implantation, an immediate postoperative CT was performed to check electrode placement and rule out acute complications. An additional MRI was performed 24 h after surgery. We collected all postoperative hemorrhages and considered them as major or minor according to Wellmer´s classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 DRE patients were operated on SEEG with 316 electrodes implanted. Three ICHs were diagnosed on postoperative imaging. Two of them were asymptomatic requiring no treatment, while the other needed surgical evacuation after clinical worsening. The total risk of hemorrhage per procedure was 12%, but just one third of them were clinically relevant. Two hemorrhages were not visible on immediate postoperative CT, being incidentally diagnosed in the 24 h MRI. We recorded them as DIH and are reported in detail.

CONCLUSION

Few reports of DIH after SEEG exist in the literature. It remains unclear whether these cases are late occurring hemorrhages or immediate postoperative hemorrhages undiagnosed on initial imaging. According to our findings, we recommend to perform additional late postoperative imaging to diagnose these cases and manage them accurately.

The UK experience of stereoelectroencephalography in children: An analysis of factors predicting the identification of a seizure-onset zone and subsequent seizure freedom

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is being used more frequently in the pre-surgical evaluation of children with focal epilepsy. It has been shown to be safe in children, but there are no multicenter studies assessing the rates and factors associated with the identification of a putative seizure-onset zone (SOZ) and subsequent seizure freedom following SEEG-guided epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort study of all children undergoing SEEG at six of seven UK Children's Epilepsy Surgery Service centers from 2014 to 2019. Demographics, noninvasive evaluation, SEEG, and operative factors were analyzed to identify variables associated with the identification of a putative SOZ and subsequent seizure freedom following SEEG-guided epilepsy surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five patients underwent 139 SEEG explorations using a total of 1767 electrodes. A putative SOZ was identified in 117 patients (85.7%); odds of successfully finding an SOZ were 6.4 times greater for non-motor seizures compared to motor seizures (p = 0.02) and 3.6 times more if four or more seizures were recorded during SEEG (p = 0.03). Of 100 patients undergoing surgical treatment, 47 (47.0%) had an Engel class I outcome at a median follow-up of 1.3 years; the only factor associated with outcome was indication for SEEG (p = 0.03); an indication of "recurrence following surgery/treatment" had a 5.9 times lower odds of achieving seizure freedom (p = 0.002) compared to the "lesion negative" cohort, whereas other indications ("lesion positive, define extent," "lesion positive, discordant noninvasive investigations" and "multiple lesions") were not statistically significantly different.

SIGNIFICANCE

This large nationally representative cohort illustrates that SEEG-guided surgery can still achieve high rates of seizure freedom. Seizure semiology and the number of seizures recorded during SEEG are important factors in the identification of a putative SOZ, and the indication for SEEG is an important factor in postoperative outcomes.

Variation in pediatric stereoelectroencephalography practice among pediatric neurosurgeons in the United States: survey results

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has become widespread in the United States during the past decade. Many pediatric neurosurgeons practicing SEEG may not have had experience with this technique during their formal training, and the literature is mostly limited to single-center series. As a result, implementation of this relatively new technique may vary at different institutions. The authors hypothesized that aspects of SEEG experience, techniques, and outcomes would vary widely among programs across the country.

METHODS

An electronic survey with 35 questions addressing the categories of training and experience, technique, electrode locations, and outcomes was sent to 128 pediatric epilepsy surgeons who were potential SEEG users.

RESULTS

Sixty-one pediatric fellowship-trained epilepsy surgeons in the United States responded to the survey. Eighty-nine percent were actively using SEEG in their practice. Seventy-two percent of SEEG programs were in existence for less than 5 years, and 68% were using SEEG for > 70% of their invasive monitoring. Surgeons at higher-volume centers operated on younger patients (p < 0.001). Most surgeons (70%) spent 1-3 hours per case planning electrode trajectories. Two-thirds of respondents reported a median implant duration of 5-7 days, but 16% reported never having an implant duration > 5 days, and 16% reported having had implants stay in place for > 4 weeks. The median response for the median number of electrodes initially implanted was 12 electrodes, although 19% of respondents reported median implants of 5-8 electrodes and 17% reported median implants of 15-18 electrodes. Having a higher volume of SEEG cases per year was associated with a higher median number of electrodes implanted (p < 0.001). Most surgeons found SEEG helpful in defining an epileptic network and reported that most of their SEEG patients undergo focal surgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

SEEG has been embraced by the pediatric epilepsy surgery community. Higher case volume is correlated with a tendency to place more electrodes and operate on younger patients. For most parameters addressed in the survey, responses from surgeons clustered around a norm, though additional findings of substantial variations highlight differences in implementation and philosophy among pediatric epilepsy programs.

Accuracy and Safety of Customized Stereotactic Fixtures for Stereoelectroencephalography in Pediatric Patients

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in children with intractable epilepsy presents particular challenges. Their thin and partially ossified cranium, specifically in the temporal area, is prone to fracture while attaching stereotactic systems to the head or stabilizing the head in robot's field of action. Postponing SEEG in this special population of patients can have serious consequences, reducing their chances of becoming seizure-free and impacting their social and cognitive development. This study demonstrates the safety and accuracy offered by a frameless personalized 3D printed stereotactic implantation system for SEEG investigations in children under 4 years of age. SEEG was carried out in a 3-year-old patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, based on a right temporal-perisylvian epileptogenic zone hypothesis. Fifteen intracerebral electrodes were placed using a StarFix patient-customized stereotactic fixture. The median lateral entry point localization error of the electrodes was 0.90 mm, median lateral target point localization error was 1.86 mm, median target depth error was 0.83 mm, and median target point localization error was 1.96 mm. There were no perioperative complications. SEEG data led to a tailored right temporal-insular-opercular resection, with resulting seizure freedom (Engel IA). In conclusion, patient-customized stereotactic fixtures are a safe and accurate option for SEEG exploration in young children.

Individualized stereoelectroencephalography evaluation and navigated resection in medically refractory pediatric epilepsy

Pediatric patients frequently require invasive exploration with intracranial electrodes to achieve high-resolution delineation of the epileptogenic zones (EZ). We intend to discuss the efficacy and safety of stereoelectroencephalophraphy (SEEG) monitoring in pediatric patients with difficulty to localize the EZ. We retrospectively analyzed presurgical findings, SEEG data, resections, and outcomes of a series of 72 consecutive pediatric patients (<18 yrs) who had medically refractory epilepsy and received SEEG recording between January 2015 and September 2019. There were 20 girls and 52 boys with a mean age of 10.13 ± 4.11 years old (range: 1.8-18 years). Twenty-seven patients (37.5%) had nonlesional magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs). In total, 744 electrodes were implanted for an average of 10.33 ± 2.53 (range: 3-18) electrodes per patient. Twenty-eight explorations were unilateral (17 left and 11 right), and 44 explorations were bilateral (12 of which was predominately one side). The average monitoring period in days for the SEEG was 8.99 ± 5.79 (range: 3-25) days. The EZ could be located in 67 (94.4%) patients for the initial implantation according to SEEG monitoring. Lobectomy was performed in 12 patients (17.9%), of those anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) was performed in 8 cases (11.9%) and insular plus was 2 cases (3.0%), multilobectomy resections in 15 cases (22.4%), tailored cortical resections in 37 cases (55.2%), and corpus callosotomy plus in 2 cases (3.0%). The average follow-up was 18.1 ± 7.53 months (range: 6-54). Forty-three of 67 patients (64.2%) were Engel class I, 12 patients (17.9%) were Engel class II, 10 patients (14.9%) were Engel class III, and an additional 2 patients (3.0%) were Engel class IV. In the SEEG implantation series, no child experienced serious or permanent morbidity. One patient (1.4%) experienced symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and 3 patients (4.2%) experienced asymptomatic ICH. There were no postimplantation infections or other postoperative complications associated with the SEEG. Several common complications related to resection surgery were included in this series with zero mortality. Of the 6 patients in whom we performed a second surgery, 4 of them subsequently became seizure-free (66.7%) after undergoing the second resection with SEEG evaluation. Stereoelectroencephalophraphy is a safe and efficient methodology to identify the EZ in particularly complex cases of focal medically refractory epilepsy for pediatric patients, even in infancy and early childhood. Seizure outcomes of SEEG-guided resection surgery are desirable. We recommend SEEG evaluations and even a more aggressive resection in certain pediatric patients who failed initial resection with realistic chances to benefit from reoperation.

Interpretation of the Intracranial Stereoelectroencephalography Signal

The intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) is essential in decision making for epilepsy surgery. Although localization of epileptogenic brain regions by means of iEEG has been the gold standard for surgical decision-making for more than 70 years, established guidelines for what constitutes genuine iEEG epileptic activity and what is normal brain activity are not available. This review provides a summary of the current state of knowledge and understanding on normal iEEG entities and variants, the effects of sleep on regional and lobar iEEG, iEEG patterns of interictal and ictal epileptic activity and their relation to well-described epileptogenic pathologies and surgical outcome.