Posterior corneal curvature assessment after Epi-LASIK for myopia: comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam imaging

Actual anterior-posterior corneal radius ratio in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction according to axial length

We retrospectively evaluate the actual anterior-posterior (AP) corneal radius ratio in eyes with previous laser correction for myopia (M-LVC) according to axial length (AL) using biometry data exported from swept-source optical coherence tomography between January 2018 and October 2021 in a tertiary hospital (1018 eyes with a history of M-LVC and 19,841 control eyes). The AP ratio was significantly higher in the LVC group than in the control group. Further, it was significantly positively correlated with AL in the LVC group. We also investigated the impact of the AP ratio, AL and keratometry (K) on the absolute prediction error (APE) in 39 eyes that underwent cataract surgery after M-LVC. In linear regression analyses, there were significant correlations between APE and AL/TK, while APE and AP ratio had no correlation. The APE was significantly lower in the Barrett True-K with total keratometry (Barrett True-TK) than in the Haigis-L formula on eyes with AL above 26 mm and K between 38 and 40 D. In conclusion, in eyes with previous M-LVC, AP ratio increases with AL. The Barrett True-K or Barrett True-TK formulas are recommended rather than Haigis-L formula in M-LVC eyes with AL above 26 mm and K between 38 and 40D.

Five-year stability of posterior corneal surface after small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia

Background

To study the 5-year changes in the posterior corneal surface after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia.

Methods

Eighty eyes received SMILE was included in this prospective study. They were allocated into two groups based on the spherical equivalent: high myopia (40eyes, -7.49 ± 0.70D) and moderate myopia (40eyes, -4.43 ± 0.87D). Certain points of posterior corneal elevation (the central point (PCE), thinnest point (PTE), maximal point (PME), and in various corneal areas) were evaluated using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus GmbH, Germany) preoperatively and at 6 months and 5 years after surgery.

Results

All surgeries were completed uneventfully and no ectasia was developed throng the observation. The safety index and efficacy index were 1.14 and 1.03 in the high myopia group, and 1.16 and 1.06 in the moderate myopia group, respectively. Most of the calculated values in the high myopia group showed a slight increase at 6 months but decreased at 5 years. At 5 years postoperatively, the value of the PTE was significantly lower than at baseline in both groups (P ≤ 0.047); a statistical difference was also revealed in the PME in the moderate group with slight changes (10.15 ± 3.01 μm vs. 11.60 ± 4.33 μm, P = 0.002); no statistical significance was observed in other calculated values (P ≥ 0.067). Similarly, no significant linear correlation was noted between changes in all values and the residual bed thickness either (P ≥ 0.057).

Conclusions

SMILE causes no protrusion in posterior corneal surface for correction of high myopia at the follow-up visit of 5 years.

Three-Year Follow-Up of Posterior Corneal Elevation in Thin Corneas After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in posterior corneal elevation in thin corneas after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

In this prospective study, 97 eyes of 97 patients undergoing SMILE were recruited. Eyes were categorized into the following groups based on the preoperative minimum central corneal thickness (CCT): group A (37 eyes, 480–499 μm), group B (30 eyes, 500–529 μm), and group C (30 eyes, 530–560 μm). The posterior corneal surface was measured with a Pentacam over a 3-year follow-up period. Changes in the posterior corneal elevation at the central point (PCE), thinnest point (PTE), and predetermined area were measured.

Results

No iatrogenic keratectasia was observed during the follow-up period. The mean changes in PCE, PTE, and the inferior area in group A were 1.14 ± 3.40 μm, −0.11 ± 3.20 μm, and −0.26 ± 1.23 μm, respectively (P ≥ 0.125). Although statistically significant change in the central-4 mm area was noted, the value was quite small (0.98 ± 1.67 μm) and was not higher than that in the other two groups (P = 0.003). For all three groups, the elevation remained stable or showed a backward change in the central annulus, while there was a small forward displacement in the 6-mm optical zone. In group A, changes in elevation values yielded negative statistical correlations with residual bed thickness and CCT (P ≤ 0.006) (except for the inferior area, the 4-mm and 6-mm optical zone).

Conclusions

With a strict preoperative assessment, SMILE achieved good safety and efficacy in correcting myopia in thin corneas and enabled a stable posterior corneal surface over a 3-year follow-up period.

Synopsis

Careful preoperative assessment and suitable surgical design should be taken to ensure posterior corneal stability after SMILE in thin corneas.

The influence of routine uncomplicated phacoemulsification on the orthogonality of the cornea

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of routine uncomplicated phacoemulsification on the orthogonal distribution of mass within the central optical zone of the cornea.

Methods:

Astigmatism at both corneal surfaces was evaluated using Orbscan II (Bausch &and Lomb) before and up to 3 months after routine phacoemulsification (one eye/patient). The data were subjected to vector analysis to estimate the pre-and postoperative total astigmatism of the cornea (TCA).

Results:

Reporting the chief findings in minus cylinder (diopters, DC) over the central 3 mm (A) and 5 mm (B) optical zones. Mean TCA powers (±sd) at pre- and 3-months postop were A) –4.45DC (±2.00) and –5.69DC (±2.69), B) –2.91DC (±2.22) and –2.71DC (±1.60). Change in mean power was significant over 3 mm (P < 0.01, n = 49) but not over 5 mm. Inter-zonal differences were significant (P < 0.01). There was a significant linear relationship between the change in TCA power (y = preoperative-postoperative) and TCA at preoperative stage (x) where, A) y = 0.45x + 3.12 (r = 0.336, n = 49, P = 0.018), B) y = x + 2.65 (r = 0.753, n = 49, P = <0.01). Over the central 3 mm zone only, change (preoperative-postoperative) in axis (°) of TCA (y₁) was significantly associated with TCA axis at preoperative stage (x₁) where y₁ = 1.391x₁-0.008x₁²-0.701 (r = 0.635, n = 49, P < 0.01).

Conclusion:

Changes in TCA power and axis at 3 months postop, determined using Orbscan II, are indicative of orthogonal alterations in the distribution of corneal tissue. Over the central 3 mm zone, the association between y₁ and x₁ shows that a change in TCA axis is more profound when preoperative axis is near 90° i.e., against-the-rule.

Impact of ablation ratio on 5-year postoperative posterior corneal stability after refractive surgery: SMILE and FS-LASIK

BACKGROUND

To investigate the impact of the ablation ratio on 5-year postoperative posterior corneal stability in myopic eyes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study: 80 eyes of 43 patients underwent SMILE surgery and 63 eyes of 32 patients underwent FS-LASIK surgery at the EYE & ENT Hospital, Fudan University. Ablation ratio was defined as lenticule thickness (SMILE cases) or ablation depth (FS-LASIK cases) divided by central corneal thickness (CCT). Posterior corneal elevation changes were recorded as posterior central elevation (PCE), posterior corneal surface at thinnest point (PTE) and posterior corneal mean elevation (PME). Patients were followed up at 6-month and 5-year interval to investigate the impact of the ablation ratio on posterior corneal elevation after SMILE and FS-LASIK surgery.

RESULTS

PCE dropped at the 6-month follow-up for both SMILE (decreased by -1.11 ± 2.93 μm, P < 0.05) and FS-LASIK groups (decreased by -0.46 ± 3.72 μm, P < 0.05). PTE also dropped in SMILE (reduced by -2.04 ± 3.02 μm, P < 0.05) and FS-LASIK group (reduced by -1.28 ± 4.21 μm, P < 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Stable PCE (elevation change: SMILE -0.28 ± 4.03 μm; FS-LASIK 0.79 ± 4.13 μm, P > 0.05) and PTE (elevation change: SMILE -0.08 ± 4.28 μm; FS-LASIK 1.42 ± 3.85 μm, P > 0.05) for both groups were recorded at the 5-year follow-up compared to the 6-month visit. Ablation ratio was strongly correlated with 5-year postoperative PCE (β = 2.68 ± 1.05, P < 0.01) and PTE (β = 2.35 ± 1.17, P < 0.05). Cut-off value for 5-year postoperative raised PCE and PTE was 27.3 and 27.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation ratio was strongly correlated with postoperative posterior corneal elevation in a 5-year follow-up in both SMILE and FS-LASIK groups. PCE and PTE underwent slight backward displacement 6-month postoperatively and remain stable at the 5-year follow-up. Threshold of the ablation ratio for resisting forward displacement of posterior corneal surface was 27.3 and 27.1% for SMILE and FS-LASIK groups, respectively.

Comparison of visual outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus flap-off epipolis LASIK for myopia

Background

This study clinically evaluated the visual outcomes after refractive surgery for myopia using femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK) and flap-off epipolis LASIK (epi-LASIK).

Methods

In this retrospective case series study, 40 eyes of 27 patients were divided into two groups depending on the technique used for refractive surgery. Femto-LASIK and flap-off epi-LASIK flaps were created using femtosecond laser and Epi-K™ epikeratome, respectively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal asphericity, and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were assessed pre- and postoperatively.

Results

The improvement in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UDVA after refractive surgery was statistically significant for both groups (P < 0.001 for all groups); it was significant better in UDVA in femto-LASIK than flap-off epi-LASIK, 0.03 ± 0.06 logMAR (femto-LASIK) and 0.54 ± 0.31 logMAR (flap-off epi-LASIK), at 1 day postoperatively; 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR (femto-LASIK) and 0.14 ± 0.13 logMAR (flap-off epi-LASIK), at 1 week postoperatively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.019). With regard to the corneal HOAs, the increment in spherical aberration (Z_4,0) was greater in flap-off epi-LASIK than femto-LASIK: 0.626 ± 0.232 μm and 0.479 ± 0.139 μm in the front cornea; 0.556 ± 0.227 μm and 0.430 ± 0.137 μm in the total cornea (P = 0.016 and P = 0.017). However, the back corneal HOA changes did not have a significant effect on the total corneal HOA changes.

Conclusion

Femto-LASIK yielded better early visual outcomes than did flap-off epi-LASIK, but there was no significant difference between the outcomes of the two procedures, 1 week postoperatively.

The Impact of Changes in Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism on the Residual Astigmatic Refractive Error following Routine Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification

Purpose

To determine the significance of any association between intersessional changes in ocular residual astigmatism (RA) and astigmatism at corneal front (FSA) and back (BSA) surfaces following uneventful routine phacoemulsification.

Methods

Astigmatism was evaluated by autorefractometry and subjective refraction and at both the corneal surfaces with Orbscan II™ (Bausch & Lomb) over central 3 mm and 5 mm optical zones at 1, 2, and 3 months after routine phacoemulsification in 103 patients implanted with monofocal nontoric intraocular lenses (IOLs, one eye/patient). Data were subjected to vector analysis to determine the actual change (Δ) in astigmatism (power and axis) for the refractive and Orbscan II findings.

Results

The number of cases that attended where ΔRA was ≥0.50 DC between 1 and 2 months was 52 by autorefractometry and 36 by subjective refraction and between 2 and 3 months was 24 by autorefractometry and 19 by subjective refraction. Vector analysis revealed significant correlations between ΔFSA and ΔRA for data obtained by autorefractometry but not by subjective refraction. At all times, ΔBSA was greater than ΔFSA (p < 0.01). Key findings for ΔBSA values over the central 3 mm zone were between (A) the sine of the axis of ΔRA (y) and sine of the axis of ΔBSA (x) for the data obtained by autorefractometry (between 1 and 2 months, y = 0.749 - 0.303x, r = 0.299, n = 52, p=0.031) and subjective refraction (between 2 and 3 months, y = 0.6614 - 0.4755x, r = 0.474, n = 19, p=0.040) and (B) ΔRA (y) and ΔBSA (x) powers between 2 and 3 months postoperatively for the data obtained by autorefractometry (ΔRA = 0.118 ΔBSA + 0.681 r = 0.467, n = 24, p=0.021) and subjective refraction (ΔRA = 0.072 ΔBSA + 0.545 r = 0.510, n = 19, p=0.026).

Conclusion

Changes in the ocular residual refractive astigmatic error after implanting a monofocal nontoric IOL are associated with changes in astigmatism at the back surface of the cornea within the central optical zone.

Three-Year Stability of Posterior Corneal Elevation After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Moderate and High Myopia

PURPOSE

To investigate long-term changes in posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

Thirty-six eyes of 20 patients (7 male, 13 female) who underwent SMILE were recruited for this prospective consecutive study. The mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent was -6.24 ± 1.47 diopters (D) (range: -3.88 to -8.75 D). Posterior corneal surfaces were measured by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery. Posterior central elevation (PCE), posterior maximal elevation (PME), and posterior elevation at the thinnest corneal point (PTE) in the central 4-mm area above the best-fit sphere (BFS) were analyzed. The BFS was the same across all follow-up periods and determined by the preoperative data. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

All surgeries were executed without complications and no case of keratectasia was observed during the follow-up. An uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better was achieved in 100% of eyes at the last visit. The mean change of PCE, PME, and PTE at 3 years after the operation was -2.39 ± 2.85, 0.50 ± 3.33, and -2.33 ± 2.90 µm, respectively. There were significant differences in the measurements of PCE and PTE before surgery and 3 years after surgery (P ≤ .009); however, there was no significant difference in PME before surgery and 3 years after surgery (P = 1.000). No correlation was found between changes in posterior corneal elevation and residual bed thickness, ablation depth, and preoperative thinnest corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior corneal surface, measured using the Pentacam, was stable after SMILE in the long-term follow-up. The cause of the slight backward change of PCE and PTE needs further study. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(2):84-88.].

Structural and biomechanical corneal differences between patients suffering from primary congenital glaucoma and healthy volunteers

PURPOSE

To determine whether a set of ocular morphometric and biomechanical variables are able to discriminate between healthy volunteers and patients suffering from primary congenital glaucoma (PCG).

METHODS

Case-control study in which 66 patients with PCG and 94 age-matched healthy subjects were evaluated using ocular response analyser (ORA) to record corneal biomechanical properties. Topographic corneal variables were obtained using the Pentacam in both groups. To determine the ability to discern between both groups, a multivariate binary logistic model was constructed. The outcome was the diagnosis of PCG and the predictors; the corneal variables analysed along with their first-term interactions. Sensitivity and specificity of this model along with the area under the receiver characteristic operating curve (AUC of ROC) were determined.

RESULTS

The best model to discriminate between both groups included the following predictors: corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), posterior maximum elevation (PME), anterior maximum elevation (AME) and central corneal thickness (CCT). This model, for a cut-point of 50%, presents a sensitivity of 86.67%, a specificity of 86.89% and an AUC of the ROC curve of 93.16% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.97-97.35]. The adjusted odds ratios of those predictors which showed a significant discriminating capacity were as follows: for CH, 0.27 (95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.46); for CRF, 2.13 (95% CI: 1.33-3.40); for PME, 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01-1.12); and for AME, 1.35 (95% CI: 1.10-1.66).

CONCLUSION

Corneal hysteresis (CH), CRF, PME and AME are able to discern between patients with PCG and healthy controls. This fact suggests that there are structural and biomechanical differences between these groups.

Posterior Corneal Surface Stability after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Keratomileusis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate posterior corneal surface variation after femtosecond laser-assisted keratomileusis in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism. Patients were evaluated by corneal tomography preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months. We analyzed changes in the posterior corneal curvature, posterior corneal elevation, and anterior chamber depth. Moreover, we explored correlation between corneal ablation depth, residual corneal thickness, percentage of ablated corneal tissue, and preoperative corneal thickness. During follow-up, the posterior corneal surface did not have a significant forward corneal shift: no significant linear relationships emerged between the anterior displacement of the posterior corneal surface and corneal ablation depth, residual corneal thickness, or percentage of ablated corneal tissue.

Comparison of posterior corneal imaging before and after LASIK using dual rotating scheimpflug and scanning slit-beam corneal tomography systems

PURPOSE

To compare the maximum posterior elevation (MPE) measurements before and after LASIK using a dual rotating Scheimpflug (DRS) imaging system (Galilei, Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems, Port, Switzerland) and a scanning slit-beam (SSB) imaging system (Orbscan IIz, Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 78 eyes from 78 patients who underwent myopic LASIK. Preoperative and postoperative data collected included anterior and posterior best-fit sphere radius and axial curvature readings, posterior central elevation (PCE), and MPE relative to a best-fit sphere using a 7.8-mm region of interest. Data were compared using paired t test analysis.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative PCE (5.06 ± 2.29 μm with the DRS system and 12.78 ± 6.90 μm with the SSB system) and MPE (4.87 ± 4 μm with the DRS system and 15.44 ± 9.78 μm with the SSB system) were statistically different (P < .001). Mean postoperative PCE (4.55 ± 2.34 μm with the DRS system and 20.59 ± 8.11 μm with the SSB system) and MPE (4.90 ± 3.35 μm with the DRS system and 24.95 ± 10.15 μm with the SSB system) were statistically different (P < .001). The difference between preoperative and postoperative MPE measurements by DRS was not statistically significant (P = .953), whereas the difference measured by SSB was statistically significant (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of DRS measurements suggests that the posterior surface of the cornea does not change appreciably after keratorefractive surgery and is imaged more accurately using DRS compared with SSB. The DRS system affords confidence in interpreting data that are useful for discerning morphologic abnormalities of the cornea, both before and after keratorefractive surgery.