Drug fever due to piperacillin/tazobactam loaded into bone cement

Utilization of Antibiotic Bone Cement in Spine Surgery: Pearls, Techniques, and Case Review

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) encompasses a spectrum of spinal infections ranging from isolated mild vertebral osteomyelitis to severe diffuse infection with associated epidural abscess and fracture. Although patients can often be treated with an initial course of intravenous antibiotics, surgery is sometimes required in patients with sepsis, spinal instability, neurological compromise, or failed medical treatment. Antibiotic bone cement (ABC) has been widely used in orthopedic extremity surgery for more than 150 years, both for prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial infection. However, relatively little literature exists regarding its utilization in spine surgery. This article describes ABC utilization in orthopedic surgery and explains the technique of ABC utilization in spine surgery. Surgeons can choose from multiple premixed ABCs with variable viscosities, setting times, and antibiotics or can mix in antibiotics to bone cements themselves. ABC can be used to fill large defects in the vertebral body or disc space or in some cases to coat instrumentation. Surgeons should be wary of complications such as ABC extravasation as well as an increased difficulty with revision. With a thorough understanding of the properties of the cement and the methods of delivery, ABC is a powerful adjunct in the treatment of spinal infections.

In vitro study of elution kinetics and biological activity of piperacillin/tazobactam and gentamicin in acrylic bone cement

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics differ in their elution characteristics from bone cement. But no such data is available on piperacillin and tazobactam. Therefore, we performed an in vitro observational study to examine (1) in vitro elution characteristics of piperacillin and tazobactam from bone cement, (2) their biological activity using minimum inhibitory concentration and (3) elution characteristics and biological activity when combined with gentamicin in bone cement.

HYPOTHESIS

The null hypothesis was that piperacillin and tazobactam after elution from bone cement can achieve concentrations higher than minimum inhibitory concentration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty milligrams bone cement was mixed with the following combination of antibiotics: without any antibiotic (sample A, control), 4g/0.50g piperacillin/tazobactam (sample B), 6g/0.75g piperacillin/tazobactam (sample C), 8g/1.0g piperacillin/tazobactam (sample D) and 4g/0.50g piperacillin/tazobactam and 400mg gentamicin (sample E). Samples were analysed on reverse-phase ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Antibacterial activity in the elute were tested against standard American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains.

RESULTS

Detectable drug elution for piperacillin and tazobactam was seen till 21days. Peak drug levels for all formulations were seen at 48hours (140.8 & 297.5μg/mL for samples B of piperacillin and tazobactam respectively). About 0.83-1.24% of piperacillin and 23.17-29.17% of tazobactam were released from the samples. Gentamicin improved elution of piperacillin and tazobactam: 140.8 vs. 919.9μg/mL (p=0.000) for samples B & E of piperacillin respectively and 297.5 & 1138.4μg/mL (p=0.001) for samples B & E of tazobactam respectively at 2days. Sample E showed complete inhibition of tested microorganisms, while B sample was microbiologically less active compared to E on day 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Piperacillin and tazobactam eluted successfully from bone cement and also retained antimicrobial activity after elution. Maximum elution was seen up to day 2 after which it reduced drastically. Antimicrobial action was seen up to 7days.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative study.

Antibiotic Cement Utilization for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Infections in Spine Surgery: Basic Science Principles and Rationale for Clinical Use

Antibiotic bone cement (ABC) is an effective tool for the prophylaxis and treatment of osteomyelitis due to the controlled, sustained release of local antibiotics. ABC has been proven to be effective in the orthopedic fields of arthroplasty and extremity trauma, but the adoption of ABC in spine surgery is limited. The characteristics of ABC make it an optimal solution for treating vertebral osteomyelitis (VO), a serious complication following spine surgery, typically caused by bacterial and sometimes fungal and parasitic pathogens. VO can be devastating, as infection can result in pathogenic biofilms on instrumentation that is dangerous to remove. New techniques, such as kyphoplasty and novel vertebroplasty methods, could amplify the potential of ABC in spine surgery. However, caution should be exercised when using ABC as there is some evidence of toxicity to patients and surgeons, antibiotic allergies, bone cement structural impairment, and possible development of antibiotic resistance. The purpose of this article is to describe the basic science of antibiotic cement utilization and review its usage in spine surgery.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Allergies: An Exception to Usual Penicillin Allergy

Purpose

The majority of penicillin allergy labels are false, and skin tests (ST) have high negative predictive value (NPV) of up to 90%. Piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) allergy has been suspected to be an exception to this, but existing literature is scarce. We investigate the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, testing outcomes and predictive value of ST in patients referred for suspected PT allergies.

Methods

The records of all patients referred for suspected PT allergy testing and prescription rates of PT in all Hong Kong public hospitals (2015–2019) were analyzed.

Results

There was an increase in both PT prescriptions and number of newly reported PT allergies between 2015 and 2019. The majority (91.1%) of patients with suspected PT allergy had at least 1 underlying medical co-morbidity or immunosuppressant use leading to increased risk of infections. Thirty-six patients with suspected PT allergy completed ST. Two patients had positive ST, and 32/34 patients with negative ST underwent drug provocation testing (DPT). Nine of these patients were diagnosed with PT allergy based on positive DPT. Overall, 11/34 (32.4%) were diagnosed with PT allergy and the NPV of ST was 71.9%.

Conclusions

There is growing utilization of PT and corresponding cases of suspected allergies. The majority of suspected PT allergies had increased risk for recurrent infections. Unlike other penicillin allergy, there is a high rate of genuine PT allergy (up to 30%) and a poor NPV of ST (up to 70%). DPT remains the gold standard for accurate diagnosis, and all patients with a suspected allergy should undergo thorough allergy workup.

Drug fever induced by piperacillin/tazobactam in an elderly patient with underlying human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection

Our search of the literature revealed no detailed case reports about drug fever induced by piperacillin/tazobactam in a patient with HIV infection although there were a few case reports about drug fever due to piperacillin/tazobactam with other comorbidities. A 63-year-old male patient with HIV positive was admitted for acute cholecystitis. He was started on piperacillin/tazobactam. For the next 8 days, he had intermittent fever up to 103°F (39.4°C) with relative bradycardia although he showed clinical improvement. There was no laboratory or imaging findings suggestive of another infectious source and drug fever was suspected. The antibiotics were stopped and after 48 hours no fever was observed until the day of discharge. Piperacillin/tazobactam can induce fever in patients with cystic fibrosis and in patients with other conditions. Drug fever may be more prevalent in patients with HIV infection. It has no characteristic pattern and may not be associated with eosinophilia.

Drug Fever Induced by Piperacillin/Tazobactam in a Scoliosis Patient: A Case Report

Drug fever is frequently underrecognized by clinicians despite its common occurrence. Fever induced by piperacillin/tazobactam has not been reported in scoliosis correction surgery.Drug fever caused by piperacillin/tazobactam in a scoliosis patient was described.A 36-year-old woman with adult scoliosis undergoing correction surgery was reported. She developed a fever after an intake of piperacillin/tazobactam for 3 days. Eosinophil count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive proteins were increased in her blood examination. Thorough history, chest radiography, blood cultures, physical examination, and urinalysis revealed no evidences of fever. A drug fever is therefore considered. The fever lasted for 2 weeks and her body temperature come back to normal 4 days after piperacillin/tazobactam cessation.Fever could be caused by piperacillin/tazobactam. The drug fever's diagnosis is easily confounded by a co-occurring infection. Therefore, it is crucial for clinicians to doubt drugs as a reason when no other origin of fever could be identified in a patient.

Diffuse Desquamating Rash Following Exposure to Vancomycin-Impregnated Bone Cement

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of systemic desquamating dermatitis following implantation of vancomycin antibiotic-laden cement (ABLC) in a patient with prior history of Stevens-Johnson (SJS) reaction to vancomycin.

CASE SUMMARY

A 59-year-old man with a history of SJS reaction to systemic vancomycin and recurrent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic knee infection developed a painful, blistering rash after implantation of bone cement that had been mixed with 2 g of vancomycin. He was started empirically on steroids by his primary care provider and had desquamation about 1 week later.

DISCUSSION

Systemic absorption of antibiotics from ABLC has been well documented in the literature. Reports of systemic toxicity are rare, and none have described systemic allergic reactions to vancomycin. This patient's prior episode of SJS was diagnosed at another academic medical center 6 years ago, and records are unavailable. Following low-level reexposure to vancomycin, he developed a diffuse painful desquamating rash. Application of the Naranjo nomogram yielded a score of 8 (probable adverse reaction). Although he did not experience fever, sore throat, or mucous membrane involvement to fulfill classic features of SJS, we believe that his severe rash represented a less-severe form of a systemic hypersensitivity reaction to vancomycin.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics contained in ABLC are systemically absorbed, though at low levels, and have been associated with systemic toxicities. Antibiotics to which a patient has had a potentially life-threatening reaction should not be used in ABLC. Particular attention should be paid to an individual's antibiotic allergy history prior to implantation of any ABLC.