1
|
Amisu BO, Okesanya OJ, Adigun OA, Manirambona E, Ukoaka BM, Lawal OA, Idris NB, Olaleke NO, Okon II, Ogaya JB, Prisno DEL. Cholera resurgence in Africa: assessing progress, challenges, and public health response towards the 2030 global elimination target. LE INFEZIONI IN MEDICINA 2024; 32:148-156. [PMID: 38827826 PMCID: PMC11142410 DOI: 10.53854/liim-3202-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Global efforts to combat epidemic cholera outbreaks have witnessed tremendous feats over the decades. However, sporadic outbreaks in regions, particularly across African states, mask these advancements. This regressive trend is frequently fuelled by factors retarding efforts towards optimal environmental sanitation and personal hygiene, which include ingesting infected food, drinking contaminated waters, and engaging in unhealthy environmental practices such as indiscriminate waste and sewage disposal and poor toilet practices. The ongoing efforts to achieve the Global Taskforce on Cholera Control (GTFCC) targets of a 90% reduction in cases and deaths by 2030, even in the wake of continuous outbreaks across various African regions, as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) face a significant threat. One such effort, among others, is the AFRICHOL project, an enhanced cholera surveillance consortium launched in Africa over a decade ago as part of the GTFCC at WHO to monitor and fast-track the GTFCC's 2030 targets. It is tasked with supporting the implementation of research-based strategies for combating cholera in Africa. The prequalified oral cholera vaccines - Dukoral, Shanchol, and Euvichol - and those with recombinant DNA technology have also emerged as remarkable strides. In the face of this progress, challenges persist. Climate change, including extreme weather events and the lack of safe water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities, acts as a multiplier, amplifying existing challenges and hindering progress. Porous borders with inefficient disease surveillance networks among member states also facilitate the inter-territorial spread of the disease. Despite ongoing challenges, global targets are achievable provided strong institutional infrastructure and additional evidence-based public health initiatives are promulgated and enacted. The Global Roadmap to Ending Cholera Outbreaks by 2030 is a resourceful tool for advancing this fight and eradicating cholera.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blessing Olawunmi Amisu
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Uniosun Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Osun state, Nigeria
| | - Olalekan John Okesanya
- Department of Public Health and Maritime Transport, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece
| | | | - Emery Manirambona
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | | | - Okikiola Azeez Lawal
- Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Kwara State University, Kwara State, Nigeria
| | - Nimat Bola Idris
- Department of Public Health, Al-Hikmah University, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria
| | - Noah Olabode Olaleke
- Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | - Inibehe Ime Okon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the Babcock University, Ogun State, Nigeria
| | | | - Don Eliseo Lucero Prisno
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ng'ombe H, Bosomprah S, Phiri B, Muchimba M, Liswaniso F, Chibuye M, Luchen CC, Chibesa K, Musukuma-Chifulo K, Mwape K, Tigere S, Silwamba S, Sinkala A, Simuyandi M, Mbewe N, Kapaya F, Cunningham AF, Chilengi R, Sack D, Chisenga CC. Comparative analysis of cholera serum vibriocidal antibodies from Convalescent and vaccinated adults in Zambia. Vaccine 2024:S0264-410X(24)00587-5. [PMID: 38760271 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Cholera is responsible for 1.3 to 4.0 million cholera cases globally and poses a significant threat, with Zambia reporting 17,169 cases as of 4th February 2024. Recognizing the crucial link between natural cholera infections and vaccine protection, this study aimed to assess immune responses post cholera infection and vaccination. This was a comparative study consisting of 50 participants enrolled during a cholera outbreak in Zambia's Eastern Province and an additional 56 participants who received oral cholera vaccinations in Zambia's Central Province. Vibriocidal antibodies were plotted as geometric mean titres in the naturally infected and vaccinated individuals. A significant difference (p < 0.047) emerged when comparing naturally infected to fully vaccinated individuals (2 doses) on day 28 against V. cholerae Ogawa. Those who received two doses of the oral cholera vaccine had higher antibody titres than those who were naturally infected. Notably, the lowest titres occurred between 0-9 days post onset, contrasting with peak responses at 10-19 days. This study addresses a critical knowledge gap in understanding cholera immunity dynamics, emphasizing the potential superiority of vaccination-induced immune responses. We recommend post infection vaccination after 40 days for sustained immunity and prolonged protection, especially in cholera hotspots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Ng'ombe
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Samuel Bosomprah
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
| | - Bernard Phiri
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mutinta Muchimba
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Fraser Liswaniso
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Mwelwa Chibuye
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Charlie Chaluma Luchen
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kennedy Chibesa
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kalo Musukuma-Chifulo
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Kapambwe Mwape
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Sekayi Tigere
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Suwilanji Silwamba
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Annel Sinkala
- Ministry of Health, Levy Mwanawasa University Teaching Hospital, Chainama, Off Great East, P.0 Box 310084, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Michelo Simuyandi
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Nyuma Mbewe
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Stand 1186, Corner of Chaholi & Addis Ababa Roads Rhodes Park, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Fred Kapaya
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Stand 1186, Corner of Chaholi & Addis Ababa Roads Rhodes Park, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Adam F Cunningham
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Roma Chilengi
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Stand 1186, Corner of Chaholi & Addis Ababa Roads Rhodes Park, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - David Sack
- John Hopkins University, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, United States of America
| | - Caroline Cleopatra Chisenga
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Corner of Lukasu and Danny Pule Roads, Mass Media, Lusaka, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matias WR, Guillaume Y, Cene Augustin G, Vissieres K, Ternier R, Slater DM, Harris JB, Franke MF, Ivers LC. Effectiveness of the Euvichol® oral cholera vaccine at 2 years: A case-control and bias-indicator study in Haiti. Int J Infect Dis 2024; 139:153-158. [PMID: 38000510 PMCID: PMC10784151 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The World Health Organization recommends the use of oral cholera vaccine (OCV) in cholera control efforts. Euvichol®, pre-qualified in 2015, is the leading component of the Global OCV stockpile, but data on its field effectiveness are limited. To evaluate Euvichol® vaccine effectiveness (VE), we conducted a case-control study between September 2018 to March 2020 following an OCV campaign in November 2017 in Haiti. METHODS Cases were individuals with acute watery diarrhea. Stool samples were tested by culture and real-time polymerase chain reaction of the Vibrio cholerae ctxA gene. Cases were matched to four community controls without diarrhea by residence, enrollment time, age, and gender, and interviewed for sociodemographics, risk factors, and self-reported vaccination. Cholera cases were analyzed by conditional logistic regression in the VE study. Non-cholera diarrhea cases were analyzed in a bias-indicator study. RESULTS We enrolled 15 cholera cases matched to 60 controls, and 63 non-cholera diarrhea cases matched to 249 controls. In the VE analysis, eight (53%) cases reported vaccination with any number of doses compared to 43 (72%) controls. Adjusted two-dose OCV VE was 69% (95% CI -71 to 94%). CONCLUSIONS Between 10-27 months after vaccination, Euvichol® was effective and similar to Shanchol™, suggesting that it can serve as one component of multi-sectoral comprehensive cholera control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilfredo R Matias
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA; Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - Damien M Slater
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jason B Harris
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Molly F Franke
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Louise C Ivers
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Harvard Global Health Institute, Cambridge, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deen J, Holmgren J, Clemens JD. Evaluating improved inactivated oral cholera vaccines for use in ending endemic cholera by 2030: opportunities and challenges. THE LANCET. INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2022; 22:e292-e298. [PMID: 35533702 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00215-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Cholera causes substantial morbidity and mortality in the world's poorest populations. For nearly a decade, an inactivated oral cholera vaccine (OCV) stockpile has been available to control and prevent outbreaks. In 2017, WHO launched a bold global initiative to reduce mortality from cholera by 90% by 2030, a cornerstone of which is deployment of OCVs from the global stockpile. The current production of OCVs for the stockpile falls well short of the doses needed to accomplish this goal. Besides efforts to enlist additional manufacturers of the current OCVs in the stockpile, inclusion of new-generation inactivated OCVs already in clinical development might offer advantages of enlarged production, improved performance, simplified logistics, and reduced costs. However, logistical, scientific, and ethical barriers make conventional, randomised, phase 3 clinical efficacy trials towards licensure of such new-generation OCVs problematic. The serum vibriocidal antibody response, the traditional immunological surrogate of protection against cholera, is imperfect for use as a standalone outcome. In this Personal View, we describe the need for new thinking on approaches for licensure and recommendations for new-generation inactivated OCVs, and suggest a pathway based on a sequential combination of immunogenicity and effectiveness observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
| | - Jan Holmgren
- The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - John D Clemens
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Korea; UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deen J, Clemens JD. Vaccine clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries: a brief review of standard, newer and proposed approaches. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:1595-1602. [DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2126357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Pedro Gil Street, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines
| | - John D Clemens
- International Vaccine Institute, SNU Research Park, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 08826 Korea
- UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kanungo S, Azman AS, Ramamurthy T, Deen J, Dutta S. Cholera. Lancet 2022; 399:1429-1440. [PMID: 35397865 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00330-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cholera was first described in the areas around the Bay of Bengal and spread globally, resulting in seven pandemics during the past two centuries. It is caused by toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 or O139 bacteria. Cholera is characterised by mild to potentially fatal acute watery diarrhoeal disease. Prompt rehydration therapy is the cornerstone of management. We present an overview of cholera and its pathogenesis, natural history, bacteriology, and epidemiology, while highlighting advances over the past 10 years in molecular epidemiology, immunology, and vaccine development and deployment. Since 2014, the Global Task Force on Cholera Control, a WHO coordinated network of partners, has been working with several countries to develop national cholera control strategies. The global roadmap for cholera control focuses on stopping transmission in cholera hotspots through vaccination and improved water, sanitation, and hygiene, with the aim to reduce cholera deaths by 90% and eliminate local transmission in at least 20 countries by 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suman Kanungo
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
| | - Andrew S Azman
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Jaqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines-Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Shanta Dutta
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deen J, Clemens JD. Licensed and Recommended Inactivated Oral CholeraVaccines: From Development to Innovative Deployment. Trop Med Infect Dis 2021; 6:32. [PMID: 33803390 PMCID: PMC8005943 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed6010032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholera is a disease of poverty and occurs where there is a lack of access to clean water and adequate sanitation. Since improved water supply and sanitation infrastructure cannot be implemented immediately in many high-risk areas, vaccination against cholera is an important additional tool for prevention and control. We describe the development of licensed and recommended inactivated oral cholera vaccines (OCVs), including the results of safety, efficacy and effectiveness studies and the creation of the global OCV stockpile. Over the years, the public health strategy for oral cholera vaccination has broadened-from purely pre-emptive use to reactive deployment to help control outbreaks. Limited supplies of OCV doses continues to be an important problem. We discuss various innovative dosing and delivery approaches that have been assessed and implemented and evidence of herd protection conferred by OCVs. We expect that the demand for OCVs will continue to increase in the coming years across many countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Pedro Gil Street, Ermita, Manila 1000, Philippines;
| | - John D. Clemens
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, GPO Box 128, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
- UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Enteric viral and bacterial infections continue to be a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in young children in low-income and middle-income countries, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Vaccines are considered an effective and practical preventive approach against the predominantly fecal-to-oral transmitted gastroenteritis particularly in the resource-limited countries or regions where implementation of sanitation systems and supply of safe drinking water are not quickly achievable. While vaccines are available for a few enteric pathogens including rotavirus and cholera, there are no vaccines licensed for many other enteric viral and bacterial pathogens. Challenges in enteric vaccine development include immunological heterogeneity among pathogen strains or isolates, a lack of animal challenge models to evaluate vaccine candidacy, undefined host immune correlates to protection, and a low protective efficacy among young children in endemic regions. In this article, we briefly updated the progress and challenges in vaccines and vaccine development for the leading enteric viral and bacterial pathogens including rotavirus, human calicivirus, Shigella, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), cholera, nontyphoidal Salmonella, and Campylobacter, and introduced a novel epitope- and structure-based vaccinology platform known as MEFA (multiepitope fusion antigen) and the application of MEFA for developing broadly protective multivalent vaccines against heterogenous pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyesuk Seo
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Pathobiology, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - Qiangde Duan
- University of Yangzhou, Institute of Comparative Medicine, Yangzhou, PR China
| | - Weiping Zhang
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Pathobiology, Urbana, Illinois, USA,CONTACT Weiping Zhang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Pathobiology, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pezzoli L. Global oral cholera vaccine use, 2013-2018. Vaccine 2020; 38 Suppl 1:A132-A140. [PMID: 31519444 PMCID: PMC10967685 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination is a key intervention to prevent and control cholera in conjunction with water, sanitation and hygiene activities. An oral cholera vaccine (OCV) stockpile was established by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2013. We reviewed its use from July 2013 to all of 2018 in order to assess its role in cholera control. We computed information related to OCV deployments and campaigns conducted including setting, target population, timelines, delivery strategy, reported adverse events, coverage achieved, and costs. In 2013-2018, a total of 83,509,941 OCV doses have been requested by 24 countries, of which 55,409,160 were approved and 36,066,010 eventually shipped in 83 deployments, resulting in 104 vaccination campaigns in 22 countries. OCVs had in general high uptake (mean administrative coverage 1st dose campaign at 90.3%; 2nd dose campaign at 88.2%; mean survey-estimated two-dose coverage at 69.9%, at least one dose at 84.6%) No serious adverse events were reported. Campaigns were organized quickly (five days median duration). In emergency settings, the longest delay was from the occurrence of the emergency to requesting OCV (median: 26 days). The mean cost of administering one dose of vaccine was 2.98 USD. The OCV stockpile is an important public health resource. OCVs were generally well accepted by the population and their use demonstrated to be safe and feasible in all settings. OCV was an inexpensive intervention, although timing was a limiting factor for emergency use. The dynamic created by the establishment of the OCV stockpile has played a role in the increased use of the vaccine by setting in motion a virtuous cycle by which better monitoring and evaluation leads to better campaign organization, better cholera control, and more requests being generated. Further work is needed to improve timeliness of response and contextualize strategies for OCV delivery in the various settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Pezzoli
- Cholera Team/Focal Point for Vaccination, Infectious Hazard Management (IHM), World Health Organization, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shaikh H, Lynch J, Kim J, Excler JL. Current and future cholera vaccines. Vaccine 2019; 38 Suppl 1:A118-A126. [PMID: 31879125 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Cholera remains a major global public health problem that is primarily linked to insufficient access to safe water and proper sanitation. Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV) has been recommended as an additional public health tool along with WASH in cholera endemic countries and in areas at risk for outbreaks. The new generation OCV is safe and offers good protection in older children and adults while limited protection in younger children less than five years of age has been observed. The combination of direct vaccine protection and vaccine herd immunity effects makes OCV highly cost-effective and, therefore, attractive for use in developing countries. Additionally, in recent studies OCV was safe in pregnant women, supporting its use in pregnant women in cholera endemic countries. However, knowledge need to be developed for current vaccines for their prolonged duration of protection and vaccines need improvements for better immune response in younger children. A single dose vaccination regimen would be more cost-effective and easier to deliver. Recent approaches have focused on designing genetically attenuated cholera strains for use in single-dose cholera vaccines. The global demand for OCV has been boosted by the WHO recommendation to use OCV and is driven largely by epidemics and outbreaks and has been increasing due to the availability of cheaper easy-to-use vaccines, feasibility of mass OCV vaccination campaigns, demonstration of protection to underserved population in precarious situations, and vaccine costs being borne by Gavi (Vaccine Alliance). For rapid access in emergency and equitable distribution of OCV in cholera-endemic low-income countries, a global OCV stockpile was established in 2013 with support from the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization. The three WHO-prequalified vaccines are Dukoral®, Shanchol™, Euvichol® (and Euvichol® Plus presentation), the latter two being included in the stockpile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanif Shaikh
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea; K.E.M. Hospital Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Julia Lynch
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jerome Kim
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Das S, Mohakud NK, Suar M, Sahu BR. Vaccine development for enteric bacterial pathogens: Where do we stand? Pathog Dis 2019; 76:5040763. [PMID: 30052916 DOI: 10.1093/femspd/fty057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gut infections triggered by pathogenic bacteria lead to most frequently occurring diarrhea in humans accounting for million deaths annually. Currently, only a few licensed vaccines are available against these pathogens for mostly travelers moving to diarrheal endemic areas. Besides commercialized vaccines, there are many formulations that are either under clinical or pre-clinical stages of development and despite several efforts to improve safety, immunogenicity and efficacy, none of them can confer long-term protective immunity, for which repeated booster doses are always recommended. Further in many countries, financial, social and political constraints have jeopardized vaccine development program against these pathogens that enforce us to gather knowledge on safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and protective efficacy regarding the same. In this review, we analyze safety and efficacy issues of vaccines against five major gut bacteria causing enteric infections. The article also simultaneously describes several barriers for vaccine development and further discusses possible strategies to enhance immunogenicity and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susmita Das
- Infection Biology Lab, KIIT School of Biotechnology, Campus XI, Bhubaneswar 751024, India
| | - Nirmal K Mohakud
- Department of Pediatrics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Patia, Bhubaneswar 751024, India
| | - Mrutyunjay Suar
- Infection Biology Lab, KIIT School of Biotechnology, Campus XI, Bhubaneswar 751024, India
| | - Bikash R Sahu
- Infection Biology Lab, KIIT School of Biotechnology, Campus XI, Bhubaneswar 751024, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
With one-third of nations at risk of cholera, we can expect to experience massive, rapidly disseminated, and prolonged cholera outbreaks such as those recently experienced in Yemen and Haiti. The prevention of cholera outbreaks like these includes the provision of potable water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH). This approach has been known for generations. However, it will be many years before universal global access to WASH is achieved. While working toward universal WASH, study data has shown that licensed and WHO prequalified cholera vaccines are important tools for cholera prevention. Oral inactivated whole-cell vaccines such as Shanchol and Euvichol-plus provide well-documented direct benefits to vaccine recipients and to the unimmunized through herd protection. Manufacturers have now increased the cholera vaccine supply, and since 2013 vaccine doses have been available for emergency and endemic control through a global stockpile. Advances in packaging and vaccine temperature control, reduced vaccine costs, the inclusion of pregnant women in vaccine campaigns, and a targeted approach to high incidence endemic areas are further increasing the usefulness of these vaccines for reducing the global cholera burden.
Collapse
|
13
|
Odevall L, Hong D, Digilio L, Sahastrabuddhe S, Mogasale V, Baik Y, Choi S, Kim JH, Lynch J. The Euvichol story - Development and licensure of a safe, effective and affordable oral cholera vaccine through global public private partnerships. Vaccine 2018; 36:6606-6614. [PMID: 30314912 PMCID: PMC6203809 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Cholera, a diarrheal disease primarily affecting vulnerable populations in developing countries, is estimated to cause disease in more than 2.5 million people and kill almost 100,000 annually. An oral cholera vaccine (OCV) has been available globally since 2001; the demand for this vaccine from affected countries has however been very low, due to various factors including vaccine price and mode of administration. The low demand for the vaccine and limited commercial incentives to invest in research and development of vaccines for developing country markets has kept the global supply of OCVs down. Since 1999, the International Vaccine Institute has been committed to make safe, effective and affordable OCVs accessible. Through a variety of partnerships with collaborators in Sweden, Vietnam, India and South Korea, and with public and private funding, IVI facilitated development and production of two affordable and WHO-prequalified OCVs and together with other stakeholders accelerated the introduction of these vaccines for the global public-sector market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Odevall
- Life Science Consultant, Gothenburg, Sweden; International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Deborah Hong
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Médecins Sans Frontières, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Laura Digilio
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Jerome H Kim
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Julia Lynch
- International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cholera: an overview with reference to the Yemen epidemic. Front Med 2018; 13:213-228. [DOI: 10.1007/s11684-018-0631-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
15
|
Russo P, Ligsay AD, Olveda R, Choi SK, Kim DR, Park JY, Park JY, Syed KA, Dey A, Kim YH, Lee SH, Kim J, Chon Y, Digilio L, Kim CW, Excler JL. A randomized, observer-blinded, equivalence trial comparing two variations of Euvichol®, a bivalent killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccine, in healthy adults and children in the Philippines. Vaccine 2018; 36:4317-4324. [PMID: 29895500 PMCID: PMC6026293 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Bridging study demonstrating the equivalence of two variations of Euvichol®. The 600L thimerosal-free Euvichol® is safe and immunogenic in adults and children. The scale-up of Euvichol® allows expanding global access to oral cholera vaccine.
Background To contribute to the global demand for oral cholera vaccine (OCV), the production of Euvichol® was scaled up with elimination of thimerosal. To demonstrate the equivalence of the variations, a study was carried out in the Philippines. Methods Healthy male and female adults and children in Manila were randomized to receive two doses of Euvichol® two weeks apart from either the 100L (Comparator) or the 600L (Test) variation. Primary and secondary immunogenicity endpoints were respectively geometric mean titer (GMT) of vibriocidal antibodies (two weeks post second dose) and seroconversion rate (two weeks after each dose) against O1 Inaba, Ogawa, and O139 serogroups. The GMT of vibriocidal antibodies against O1 Inaba, Ogawa, and O139 two weeks post first dose was also measured. To show the equivalence of two variations of Euvichol®, the ratio of GMT and the difference of seroconversion rate between Test and Comparator vaccines were tested with equivalence margin of [0.5, 2.0] for GMT ratio and of 15% for seroconversion rate, respectively. Safety assessment included solicited reactogenicity within 6 days after each dose and unsolicited and serious adverse events. Results A total of 442 participants were enrolled. For the overall population, equivalence between Test and Comparator was demonstrated for vibriocidal antibody response against O1 Inaba and Ogawa serotypes and O139 serogroup in both modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol analysis, since the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of GMT to any serotypes were within the lower and upper boundary [0.5, 2.0]. Seroconversion rates after two doses also showed equivalence for O1 Inaba, Ogawa, and O139. The vaccine was safe and well tolerated, similarly between the two groups. Conclusion The study results support the equivalence of the 600L Euvichol® to the 100L formulation in healthy children and adults. The 600L Euvichol® is safe and immunogenic in adults and children. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02502331.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Russo
- Clinical Development & Regulatory, Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | | | - Remigio Olveda
- Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Manila, Philippines
| | - Seuk Keun Choi
- EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deok Ryun Kim
- Biostatistics & Data Management, Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Yeon Park
- Biostatistics & Data Management, Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Yeong Park
- Translational Immunology Laboratory, Science Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Ayan Dey
- Translational Immunology Laboratory, Science Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yang Hee Kim
- Clinical Development & Regulatory, Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Jayoung Kim
- Program Management, Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yun Chon
- Biostatistics & Data Management, Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Laura Digilio
- Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Wha Kim
- Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jean-Louis Excler
- Clinical Development & Regulatory, Development & Delivery Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lopez AL, Deen J, Azman AS, Luquero FJ, Kanungo S, Dutta S, von Seidlein L, Sack DA. Immunogenicity and Protection From a Single Dose of Internationally Available Killed Oral Cholera Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66:1960-1971. [PMID: 29177437 PMCID: PMC5982790 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix1039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In addition to improved water supply and sanitation, the 2-dose killed oral cholera vaccine (OCV) is an important tool for the prevention and control of cholera. We aimed to document the immunogenicity and protection (efficacy and effectiveness) conferred by a single OCV dose against cholera. The metaanalysis showed that an estimated 73% and 77% of individuals seroconverted to the Ogawa and Inaba serotypes, respectively, after an OCV first dose. The estimates of single-dose vaccine protection from available studies are 87% at 2 months decreasing to 33% at 2 years. Current immunologic and clinical data suggest that protection conferred by a single dose of killed OCV may be sufficient to reduce short-term risk in outbreaks or other high-risk settings, which may be especially useful when vaccine supply is limited. However, until more data suggest otherwise, a second dose should be given as soon as circumstances allow to ensure robust protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lena Lopez
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila
- Delivering Oral Vaccine Effectively, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jacqueline Deen
- Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila
- Delivering Oral Vaccine Effectively, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrew S Azman
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Suman Kanungo
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Beliaghata, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Shanta Dutta
- National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Beliaghata, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Lorenz von Seidlein
- Delivering Oral Vaccine Effectively, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - David A Sack
- Delivering Oral Vaccine Effectively, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zheng Z, Diaz-Arévalo D, Guan H, Zeng M. Noninvasive vaccination against infectious diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2018; 14:1717-1733. [PMID: 29624470 PMCID: PMC6067898 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1461296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of a successful vaccine, which should elicit a combination of humoral and cellular responses to control or prevent infections, is the first step in protecting against infectious diseases. A vaccine may protect against bacterial, fungal, parasitic, or viral infections in animal models, but to be effective in humans there are some issues that should be considered, such as the adjuvant, the route of vaccination, and the antigen-carrier system. While almost all licensed vaccines are injected such that inoculation is by far the most commonly used method, injection has several potential disadvantages, including pain, cross contamination, needlestick injury, under- or overdosing, and increased cost. It is also problematic for patients from rural areas of developing countries, who must travel to a hospital for vaccine administration. Noninvasive immunizations, including oral, intranasal, and transcutaneous administration of vaccines, can reduce or eliminate pain, reduce the cost of vaccinations, and increase their safety. Several preclinical and clinical studies as well as experience with licensed vaccines have demonstrated that noninvasive vaccine immunization activates cellular and humoral immunity, which protect against pathogen infections. Here we review the development of noninvasive immunization with vaccines based on live attenuated virus, recombinant adenovirus, inactivated virus, viral subunits, virus-like particles, DNA, RNA, and antigen expression in rice in preclinical and clinical studies. We predict that noninvasive vaccine administration will be more widely applied in the clinic in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhichao Zheng
- a Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine , Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong , China.,b Center of Emphasis in Infectious Diseases , Department of Biomedical Sciences , Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso , El Paso , Texas , USA
| | - Diana Diaz-Arévalo
- c Grupo Funcional de Inmunología , Fundación Instituto de Inmunología de Colombia-FIDIC, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario , Bogotá , DC . Colombia
| | - Hongbing Guan
- a Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine , Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong , China
| | - Mingtao Zeng
- a Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine , Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University , Guangzhou , Guangdong , China.,b Center of Emphasis in Infectious Diseases , Department of Biomedical Sciences , Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso , El Paso , Texas , USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Saha A, Rosewell A, Hayen A, MacIntyre CR, Qadri F. Improving immunization approaches to cholera. Expert Rev Vaccines 2016; 16:235-248. [PMID: 27805467 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2017.1249470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholera's impact is greatest in resource-limited countries. In the last decade several large epidemics have led to a global push to improve and implement the tools for cholera prevention and control. Areas covered: PubMed, Google Scholar and the WHO website were searched to review the literature and summarize the current status of cholera vaccines to make recommendations on improving immunization approaches to cholera. Oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have demonstrated their effectiveness in endemic, outbreak response and emergency settings, highlighting their potential for wider adoption. While two doses of the currently available OCVs are recommended by manufacturers, a single dose would be easier to implement. Encouragingly, recent studies have shown that cold chain requirements may no longer be essential. The establishment of the global OCV stockpile in 2013 has been a major advance in cholera preparedness. New killed and live-attenuated vaccines are being actively explored as candidate vaccines for endemic settings and/or as a traveller's vaccine. The recent advances in cholera vaccination approaches should be considered in the global cholera control strategy. Expert commentary: The development of affordable cholera vaccines is a major success to improve cholera control. New vaccines and country specific interventions will further reduce the burden of this disease globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Saha
- a School of public Health and Community medicine , University of New South Wales , Sydney , NSW , Australia.,b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr, b) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| | - Alexander Rosewell
- a School of public Health and Community medicine , University of New South Wales , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Andrew Hayen
- a School of public Health and Community medicine , University of New South Wales , Sydney , NSW , Australia.,c Faculty of Health , University of Technology Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - C Raina MacIntyre
- a School of public Health and Community medicine , University of New South Wales , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Firdausi Qadri
- b Infectious Diseases Division , International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh (icddr, b) , Dhaka , Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baik YO, Choi SK, Olveda RM, Espos RA, Ligsay AD, Montellano MB, Yeam JS, Yang JS, Park JY, Kim DR, Desai SN, Singh AP, Kim IY, Kim CW, Park SN. A randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing two bivalent killed, whole cell, oral cholera vaccines (Euvichol vs Shanchol) in the Philippines. Vaccine 2015; 33:6360-5. [PMID: 26348402 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Revised: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, there are two oral cholera vaccines (OCV) that are prequalified by the World Health Organization. Both (Dukoral and Shanchol) have been proven to be safe, immunogenic, and effective. As the global supply of OCV remains limited, we assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a new low cost, killed, bivalent OCV (Euvichol) in the Philippines. METHODS The randomized controlled trial was carried out in healthy Filipino adults and children. Two doses of either the current WHO prequalified OCV (Shanchol) or the same composition OCV being considered for WHO prequalification (Euvichol) were administered to participants. RESULTS The pivotal study was conducted in total of 1263 healthy participants (777 adults and 486 children). No serious adverse reactions were elicited in either vaccine groups. Vibriocidal antibody responses to V. cholerae O1 Inaba following administration of two doses of Euvichol were non-inferior to those of Shanchol in adults (82% vs 76%) and children (87% vs 89%). Similar findings were observed for O1 Ogawa in adults (80% vs 74%) and children (91% vs 88%). CONCLUSION A two dose schedule with Euvichol induces a strong vibriocidal response comparable to those elicited by the currently WHO prequalified OCV, Shanchol. Euvichol will be an oral cholera vaccine suitable for use in lower income countries, where cholera still has a significant economic and public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeong Ok Baik
- EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seuk Keun Choi
- EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Remigio M Olveda
- Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines
| | - Roberto A Espos
- De Lasalle University Medical Center, Dasmarinas, Philippines
| | | | | | | | - Jae Seung Yang
- Clinical Immunology, Laboratory Science Unit, International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Yeon Park
- Development and Delivery, International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deok Ryun Kim
- Development and Delivery, International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sachin N Desai
- Development and Delivery, International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ajit Pal Singh
- Development and Delivery, International Vaccine Institute (IVI), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ick Young Kim
- Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Wha Kim
- Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sue-nie Park
- EuBiologics Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|