1
|
Yilmaz S, Gorgun E. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:277-288. [PMID: 39132198 PMCID: PMC11309798 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Up to 15% of colorectal polyps are amenable for conventional polypectomy. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are introduced for the treatment of those polyps. They provide higher en bloc resection rates compared with conventional techniques, while helping patients to avoid the complications of surgery. Note that 20 mm is considered as the largest size of a polyp that can be resected by polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in an en bloc fashion. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for polyps larger than 20 mm. Intramucosal carcinomas and carcinomas with limited submucosal invasion can also be resected with ESD. EMR is snare resection of a polyp following submucosal injection and elevation. ESD involves several steps such as marking, submucosal injection, incision, and dissection. Bleeding and perforation are the most common complications following advanced endoscopic procedures, which can be treated with coagulation and endoscopic clipping. En bloc resection rates range from 44.5 to 63% for EMR and from 87.9 to 96% for ESD. Recurrence rates following EMR and ESD are 7.4 to 17% and 0.9 to 2%, respectively. ESD is considered enough for the treatment of invasive carcinomas in the presence of submucosal invasion less than 1000 μm, absence of lymphovascular invasion, well-moderate histological differentiation, low-grade tumor budding, and negative resection margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumeyye Yilmaz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pontarollo G, Bonjour M, Walter T, Pioche M, Lavrut PM, Rabeyrin M, Hervieu V, Fenouil T. Histopronostic factors in superficial colorectal adenocarcinomas treated by endoscopy: reproducibility and impact of immunohistochemistry and digital pathology. Virchows Arch 2024; 485:233-244. [PMID: 38273213 PMCID: PMC11329611 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03722-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic dissection is the first-choice treatment for superficial pT1 colorectal adenocarcinoma (sCRC). Complementary surgery decision is influenced by histopronostic factors. Prognostic significance and reproducibility of each factor are not well established. The role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and digital pathology in this context is unknown. Our aims were (1) to evaluate each histopronostic factor reproducibility comparing HES and IHC ± digital pathology and (2) to evaluate how the different techniques would affect indications for additional surgery. We performed a single-centre retrospective study of 98 patients treated between 2010 and 2019 in Hospices Civils de Lyon, France. We analyzed physical or digital slides of HES and keratin/desmin immunostaining of 98 sCRC dissection specimens. Three pathologists evaluate the histopronostic factors including submucosal invasion depth (SMI) measured using different recommended methods. Assessment of SMI with Ueno or JSCCR methods showed good to excellent interobserver reproducibility (IOR) (ICCs of 0.858 to 0.925) using HES staining and IHC. Assessment of budding on HES sections was poorly reproducible compared to IHC which exhibit moderate IOR (κ = 0.714). IHC increased high-grade budding detection. For lymphovascular invasion and poor differentiation, the IOR was poor (κ = 0.141, 0.196 and 0.313 respectively). IHC gave a better reproducibility for further treatment indication according to JSCCR criteria (κ = 0.763) or forthcoming European guidelines (κ = 0.659). Digital pathology was equivalent to the microscope for all analyses. Histopronostic factor reproducibility in sCRC is moderate. Immunohistochemistry may facilitate the evaluation of certain criteria and improve the reproducibility of treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Pontarollo
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut de Pathologie Multi-sites, site EST, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677, Bron, France
| | - Maxime Bonjour
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Service de Biostatistique-Bioinformatique, Pôle Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Walter
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, service d'oncologie médicale, Hôpital Édouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, service d'oncologie médicale, Hôpital Édouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre-Marie Lavrut
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut de Pathologie Multi-sites, site EST, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677, Bron, France
| | - Maud Rabeyrin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut de Pathologie Multi-sites, site EST, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677, Bron, France
| | - Valérie Hervieu
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut de Pathologie Multi-sites, site EST, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677, Bron, France
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Tanguy Fenouil
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Institut de Pathologie Multi-sites, site EST, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 59 boulevard Pinel, 69677, Bron, France.
- Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong NACS. My approach to assessing for colorectal polyp cancer. J Clin Pathol 2024:jcp-2024-209604. [PMID: 39074975 DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2024-209604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Assessing a locally excised colorectal adenoma for malignancy is a common but often challenging scenario. This article outlines a simple, stepwise approach to this diagnostic assessment. The first steps are to assess for high-grade dysplasia and, if present, to determine whether any neoplastic glands lie within the submucosa. If so, a distinction must then be made between epithelial misplacement and adenocarcinoma; this process is aided by certain clinical and endoscopic data together with assessment of six key histological features. If adenocarcinoma is diagnosed, a final step is to report the presence/absence of high-risk features of polyp cancers because this will then determine if further surgical resection is required for that malignancy. Caveats, uncertainties and newly introduced concepts exist at several steps of the assessment pathway presented and are therefore discussed in detail throughout the article.
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiang SX, Zarrin A, Shahidi N. T1 colorectal cancer management in the era of minimally invasive endoscopic resection. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:2284-2294. [PMID: 38994167 PMCID: PMC11236244 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i6.2284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
T1 colorectal cancer (CRC), defined by tumor invasion confined to the submucosa, has historically been managed by surgery. Improved understanding of recurrence and lymph node metastases risk, coupled with advances in endoscopic resection techniques, have led to an increasing capacity for organ-sparing local excision. Minimally invasive management of T1 CRC begins with optical evaluation of the lesion to diagnose invasive disease and quantify depth of invasion, which informs therapeutic decision making. Modality selection between various available endoscopic resection techniques depends upon lesion characteristics, technique risk-benefit profiles, and location-specific implications. Following endoscopic resection, established histopathology features determine the risk of recurrence and subsequent management including surveillance or adjuvant surgical excision. The management of non-operative candidates deviates from conventional recommendations with emerging treatment strategies in select populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Xue Jiang
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6Z2K5, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Aein Zarrin
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6Z2K5, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6Z2K5, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver V6Z2K5, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Q, Hong R, Zhang P, Hou L, Bao H, Bai L, Zhao J. A clinical-radiomics nomogram based on spectral CT multi-parameter images for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis 2024:10.1007/s10585-024-10293-3. [PMID: 38767757 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-024-10293-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
To develop a clinical-radiomics nomogram based on spectral CT multi-parameter images for predicting lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. A total of 76 patients with colorectal cancer and 156 lymph nodes were included. The clinical data of the patients were collected, including gender, age, tumor location and size, preoperative tumor markers, etc. Three sets of conventional images in the arterial, venous, and delayed phases were obtained, and six sets of spectral images were reconstructed using the arterial phase spectral data, including virtual monoenergetic images (40 keV, 70 keV, 100 keV), iodine density maps, iodine no water maps, and virtual non-contrast images. Radiomics features of lymph nodes were extracted from the above images, respectively. Univariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used to select features. A clinical model was constructed based on age and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. The radiomics features selected were used to generate a composed radiomics signature (Com-RS). A nomogram was developed using age, CEA, and the Com-RS. The models' prediction efficiency, calibration, and clinical application value were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, respectively. The nomogram outperforms the clinical model and the Com-RS (AUC = 0.879, 0.824). It is well calibrated and has great clinical application value. This study developed a clinical-radiomics nomogram based on spectral CT multi-parameter images, which can be used as an effective tool for preoperative personalized prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Li
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China
| | - Rui Hong
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China
| | - Liting Hou
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China
| | - Hailun Bao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China
| | - Lin Bai
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
| | - Jian Zhao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Watanabe J, Ichimasa K, Kataoka Y, Miki A, Someko H, Honda M, Tahara M, Yamashina T, Yeoh KG, Kawai S, Kotani K, Sata N. Additional staining for lymphovascular invasion is associated with increased estimation of lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:533-545. [PMID: 37746764 DOI: 10.1111/den.14691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a critical risk factor for lymph node metastasis (LNM), which requires additional surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the impact of additional staining on estimating LNM is unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of additional staining on determining LNM in T1 CRC. METHODS We searched five electronic databases. Outcomes were diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), assessed using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and interobserver agreement among pathologists for positive LVI, assessed using Kappa coefficients (κ). We performed a subgroup analysis of studies that simultaneously included a multivariable analysis for other risk factors (deep submucosal invasion, poor differentiation, and tumor budding). RESULTS Among the 64 studies (18,097 patients) identified, hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and additional staining for LVI had pooled sensitivities of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.58) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.44-0.86), specificities of 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.94) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.86), and DORs of 6.26 (95% CI 3.73-10.53) and 6.47 (95% CI 3.40-12.32) for determining LNM, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the DOR of additional staining for LNM (DOR 5.95; 95% CI 2.87-12.33) was higher than that of HE staining (DOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.13-3.16) (P = 0.01). Pooled κ values were 0.37 (95% CI 0.22-0.52) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.04-0.99) for HE and additional staining for LVI, respectively. CONCLUSION Additional staining for LVI may increase the DOR for LNM and interobserver agreement for positive LVI among pathologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Watanabe
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Katsuro Ichimasa
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
- Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Yuki Kataoka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyoto Min-iren Asukai Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsushi Miki
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Someko
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group, Osaka, Japan
- General Internal Medicine, Asahi General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Munenori Honda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Makiko Tahara
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamashina
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Khay Guan Yeoh
- Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Shigeo Kawai
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Tochigi Medical Center Shimotsuga, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Kotani
- Division of Community and Family Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Naohiro Sata
- Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Norton EJ, Bateman AC. Risk assessment in pT1 colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2024; 77:225-232. [PMID: 37985141 DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2023-208803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy worldwide and tumour stage is closely related to clinical outcome. A small but significant proportion of submucosal-invasive (ie, pT1) CRC are associated with regional lymph node metastases (LNM) and a worse prognosis. The likelihood of LNM in pT1 CRC needs to be balanced against the operative risk and costs of surgical resection when determining the best patient management. A wide range of histopathological and clinical factors may affect LNM risk in this setting. This script provides a comprehensive overview of the tumour and patient-associated features that have been linked to LNM risk in pT1 CRC. Some of the features are well established within the literature and are included in published guidelines, while others are novel and emerging in nature. Odds ratios for LNM that are associated with key predictive features are provided where appropriate, and published models developed as an aid to the calculation of LNM risk are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Jane Norton
- Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Adrian C Bateman
- Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corre F, Albouys J, Tran VT, Lepilliez V, Ratone JP, Coron E, Lambin T, Rahmi G, Karsenti D, Canard JM, Chabrun E, Camus M, Wallenhorst T, Chevaux JB, Schaefer M, Gerard R, Rouquette A, Terris B, Coriat R, Jacques J, Barret M, Pioche M, Chaussade S, Cappelle E. Impact of surgery after endoscopically resected high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: results of an emulated target trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:408-416.e2. [PMID: 37793506 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with high-risk T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) resected endoscopically who received either additional surgery or surveillance. METHODS We used data from routine care to emulate a target trial aimed at comparing 2 strategies after endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 CRC: surgery with lymph node dissection (treatment group) versus surveillance alone (control group). All patients from 14 tertiary centers who underwent an endoscopic resection for high-risk T1 CRC between March 2012 and August 2019 were included. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of cancer recurrence or death at 48 months. RESULTS Of 197 patients included in the analysis, 107 were categorized in the treatment group and 90 were categorized in the control group. From baseline to 48 months, 4 of 107 patients (3.7%) died in the treatment group and 6 of 90 patients (6.7%) died in the control group. Four of 107 patients (3.7%) in the treatment group experienced a cancer recurrence and 4 of 90 patients (4.4%) in the control group experienced a cancer recurrence. After balancing the baseline covariates by inverse probability of treatment weighting, we found no significant difference in the rate of death and cancer recurrence between patients in the 2 groups (weighted hazard ratio, .95; 95% confidence interval, .52-1.75). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that patients with high-risk T1 CRC initially treated with endoscopic resection may not benefit from additional surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Félix Corre
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie Albouys
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Viet-Thi Tran
- Paris Cité University and Sorbonne Paris Nord University, INSERM, INRAE, Center for Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Paris, France
| | | | | | - Emmanuel Coron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Digestive Diseases Institute, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Thomas Lambin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Marine Camus
- Department of Endoscopy, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Timothée Wallenhorst
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | - Marion Schaefer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Brabois University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Romain Gerard
- Department of Gastroenterology, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Rouquette
- Paris Cité University, Paris, France; Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Benoit Terris
- Paris Cité University, Paris, France; Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Cappelle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Quénéhervé L, Pioche M, Jacques J. Curative criteria for endoscopic treatment of colorectal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 68:101883. [PMID: 38522881 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
As endoscopic treatment enables en bloc resection of T1 colorectal cancers, the risk of recurrence, often assimilated to the risk of lymph node metastases, must be assessed in order to offer patients an additional treatment if this risk is deemed significant. The curative criteria currently used by most guidelines are depth of invasion <1 mm, well or moderately differentiated tumour, absence of lympho-vascular invasion, absence of significant budding and tumour-free resection margins. However, these factors must be assessed by qualified pathologists, as they are difficult to evaluate. Moreover, the combination of these factors leads to unnecessary surgery in over 80 % of patients whose tumours are classified as high risk. Refinement of current criteria and research into new tumour and immunological markers are needed to better predict the actual risk of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Endoscopy and Hepatogastroenterology, Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kwon MJ, Park HY, Lim H, Son IT, Kim MJ, Kim NY, Kim MJ, Nam ES, Cho SJ, Bang WJ, Kang HS. Potential Molecular Markers Related to Lymph Node Metastasis and Stalk Resection Margins in Pedunculated T1 Colorectal Cancers Using Digital Spatial Profiling: A Pilot Study with a Small Case Series. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:1103. [PMID: 38256174 PMCID: PMC10816845 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25021103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
There is a debate regarding the prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study with four cases of pedunculated T1 CRCs, we aimed to investigate gene expression variations based on the distance from the Haggitt line (HL) and identify potential molecular risk factors for LNM. By leveraging the Cancer Transcriptome Atlas and digital spatial profiling technology, we meticulously analyzed discrete regions, including the head, HL, proximal stalk region (300-1000 μm from HL), and distal stalk region (1500-2000 μm from HL) to identify spatially sequential molecular changes. Our findings showed significant overall gene expression variations among the head, proximal stalk, and distal stalk regions of pedunculated T1 CRCs compared to the control adenoma. Compared to LNM-negative T1 CRCs, LNM-positive T1 CRC showed that the expression of genes involved in immune-related pathways such as B2M, HLA-B, and HLA-E were significantly downregulated in the distal stalk region compared to the proximal stalk region. In summary, our results may tentatively suggest considering endoscopic resection of the stalk with a minimum 2000 μm margin from the HL, taking into account the gene expression alterations related to immune-related pathways. However, we acknowledge the limitations of this pilot study, notably the small case series, which may restrict the depth of interpretation. Further validation is imperative to substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Jung Kwon
- Department of Pathology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea;
| | - Ha Young Park
- Department of Pathology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Lim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
| | - Il Tae Son
- Department of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Jeong Kim
- Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
| | - Nan Young Kim
- Hallym Institute of Translational Genomics and Bioinformatics, Hallym University Medical Center, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Sook Nam
- Department of Pathology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Jin Cho
- Department of Pathology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05355, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Jin Bang
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Suk Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim EM, Son IT, Kim BC, Park JH, Kang BM, Kim JW. A Retrospective Multicenter Study of Risk Factors, Stratification, and Prognosis of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 and T2 Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7744. [PMID: 38137813 PMCID: PMC10743749 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to compare the long-term prognosis of patients with T1 and T2 colorectal cancer (CRC) according to lymph node metastasis (LNM) and to identify risk factors for LNM. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent curative resection for T1 or T2 CRC at five University-affiliated hospitals between January 2012 and December 2021. The patients were divided into several groups depending on the presence of LNM or the number of risk factors. RESULTS Of the total 765 patients, 87 (11.3%) patients had LNM. These patients had poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) than patients without LNM (72.6% vs. 88.6%). The multivariable analysis showed that high-grade tumors (p = 0.003), lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001), and rectal location (p = 0.049) were independent predictors of LNM. When divided into groups according to the number of the three risk factors, the risk of LNM increased from 5.4% (ultralow-risk group; no risk factor) to 60.0% (high-risk group; all three risk factors) and the 5-year RFS rate decreased from 96.3% in the ultralow-risk group to 60% in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Radical surgery should be considered for T1 and T2 CRC patients with these risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eui Myung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-si 445-170, Republic of Korea;
| | - Il Tae Son
- Department of Surgery, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang-si 445-907, Republic of Korea;
| | - Byung Chun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 948-1, 1, Shingil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150-950, Republic of Korea;
| | - Jun Ho Park
- Department of Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 445 Gil-1-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-701, Republic of Korea;
| | - Byung Mo Kang
- Department of Surgery, Chun Cheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 77 Sakju-ro, Chuncheon-si 200-130, Republic of Korea;
| | - Jong Wan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-si 445-170, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shi K, Yang Z, Leng K. Treatment for T1 colorectal cancers substratified by site and size: "horses for courses". Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1230844. [PMID: 37901402 PMCID: PMC10602675 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1230844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Owing to advances in diagnostic technology, the diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancers (CRCs) continues to increase. However, the optimal management of T1 CRCs in the Western Hemisphere remains unclear due to limited population-based data directly comparing the efficacy of endoscopic therapy (ET) and surgical resection (SR). The purpose of this study was to report outcome data from a large Western cohort of patients who underwent ET or SR for early CRCs. Methods The SEER-18 database was used to identify patients with T1 CRCs diagnosed from 2004 to 2018 treated with ET or SR. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to identify variables related to lymph node metastasis (LNM). Rates of ET and 1-year relative survival were calculated for each year. Effect of ET or SR on overall survival and cancer-specific survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier method stratified by tumor size and site. Results A total of 28,430 T1 CRCs patients were identified from 2004 to 2018 in US, with 22.7% undergoing ET and 77.3% undergoing SR. The incidence of T1 CRCs was 6.15 per 100,000 person-years, with male patients having a higher incidence. Left-sided colon was the most frequent location of tumors. The utilization of ET increased significantly from 2004 to 2018, with no significant change in 1-year relative survival rate. Predictors of LNM were age at diagnosis, sex, race, tumor size, histology, grade, and location. The 5-year relative survival rates were 91.4 and 95.4% for ET and SR, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that OS and CSS were similar between ET and SR in T1N0M0 left-sided colon cancers with tumors 2 cm or less and in rectal cancers with tumors 1 cm or less. Conclusion Our study showed that ET was feasible and safe for patients with left-sided T1N0M0 colon cancers and tumors of 2 cm or less, as well as T1N0M0 rectal cancers and tumors of 1 cm or less. Therefore, the over- and under-use of ET should be avoided by carefully selecting patients based on tumor size and site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kexin Shi
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Zhen Yang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, China
| | - Kaiming Leng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Knoblauch M, Kühn F, von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt V, Werner J, Renz BW. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Early Colorectal Cancer. Visc Med 2023; 39:10-16. [PMID: 37265550 PMCID: PMC10230821 DOI: 10.1159/000526633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Early colorectal cancer (eCRC) is defined as cancer that does not cross the submucosal layer of the colon or rectum, including carcinoma in situ (pTis), pT1a, and pT1b. Early carcinomas differ in their prognosis depending on the risk profile. The differentiation between low and high risk is essential. The low-risk group includes R0-resected, well (G1) or moderately (G2) differentiated tumors without lymphatic vessel invasion (L0), without blood vessel invasion (V0) and a tumor size ≤3 cm. In this constellation, the estimated risk of lymph node metastasis is around 1% or below. The high-risk group includes tumors with incomplete resection (Rx), poor (G3) or undifferentiated (G4) carcinomas, and/or lymphatic and blood vessel invasion (L1) and size ≥3 cm. In a "high-risk" situation, there is a risk for lymph node metastasis of up to 23%. Summary The incidence of eCRC is rising with a rate of 10% in all endoscopically removed lesions during colonoscopy. For a correct histological evaluation, all suspected lesions should be completely resected. In case of a pT1 lesion in the rectum, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to evaluate for suspicious lymph nodes. The therapeutic approach for eCRC is based on histological assessment and ranges from endoscopic resection to radical oncological surgery. The advantages, disadvantages, and associated risks of the individual treatment strategy need to be carefully discussed on a tumor board and with the patient. Key Messages Treatment options for early colorectal cancer depend on the histological assessment. Poorly differentiated carcinomas, a Kudo ≥ SM2 classified lesion, and a Haggitt level 4 always represent a "high-risk" situation. It should also be mentioned that in rectal cancer, local surgical tumor excision (full-wall excision) is also sufficient for pT1 carcinomas with a "low-risk" constellation (G1/G2; L0, size <3 cm) and an R0 resection.
Collapse
|
14
|
Santos-Antunes J, Pioche M, Ramos-Zabala F, Cecinato P, Gallego Rojo FJ, Barreiro P, Félix C, Sferrazza S, Berr F, Wagner A, Lemmers A, Figueiredo Ferreira M, Albéniz E, Uchima H, Küttner-Magalhães R, Fernandes C, Morais R, Gupta S, Martinho-Dias D, Rios E, Faria-Ramos I, Marques M, Bourke MJ, Macedo G. Risk of residual neoplasia after a noncurative colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for malignant lesions: a multinational study. Endoscopy 2023; 55:235-244. [PMID: 35863354 DOI: 10.1055/a-1906-8000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in colorectal lesions is technically demanding and a significant rate of noncurative procedures is expected. We aimed to assess the rate of residual lesions after a noncurative ESD for colorectal cancer (CRC) and to establish predictive scores to be applied in the clinical setting. METHODS : Retrospective multicenter analysis of consecutive colorectal ESDs. Patients with noncurative ESDs performed for the treatment of CRC lesions submitted to complementary surgery or with at least one follow-up endoscopy were included. RESULTS : From 2255 colorectal ESDs, 381 (17 %) were noncurative, and 135 of these were performed in CRC lesions. A residual lesion was observed in 24 patients (18 %). Surgery was performed in 96 patients and 76 (79 %) had no residual lesion in the colorectal wall or in the lymph nodes. The residual lesion rate for sm1 cancers was 0 %, and for > sm1 cancers was also 0 % if no other risk factors were present. Independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis were poor differentiation and lymphatic permeation (NC-Lymph score). Risk factors for the presence of a residual lesion in the wall were piecemeal resection, poor differentiation, and positive/indeterminate vertical margin (NC-Wall score). CONCLUSIONS : Lymphatic permeation or poor differentiation warrant surgery owing to their high risk of lymph node metastasis, mainly in > sm1 cancers. In the remaining cases, en bloc and R0 resections resulted in a low risk of residual lesions in the wall. Our scores can be a useful tool for the management of patients who undergo noncurative colorectal ESDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Santos-Antunes
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Felipe Ramos-Zabala
- Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Medical Sciences, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, HM Hospitales, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Cecinato
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Pedro Barreiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
- Lisbon Advanced Endoscopic Center, Hospital Lusíadas, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Catarina Félix
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Frieder Berr
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinics Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andrej Wagner
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Clinics Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Navarrabiomed Research Institute, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Public University of Navarra, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Hugo Uchima
- Digestive Endoscopy Service, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
- Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricardo Küttner-Magalhães
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carlos Fernandes
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Rui Morais
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel Martinho-Dias
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Elisabete Rios
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Isabel Faria-Ramos
- Ipatimup/i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto), Porto, Portugal
| | - Margarida Marques
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário S. João, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bae HJ, Ju H, Lee HH, Kim J, Lee BI, Lee SH, Won DD, Lee YS, Lee IK, Cho YS. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1231-1241. [PMID: 36171453 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09649-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term outcomes of patients with T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) who undergo endoscopic and/or surgical treatment are not well understood. Invasive CRC confined to the colonic submucosa (T1 CRC) is challenging in terms of clinical decision-making. We compared the long-term outcomes of T1 CRC by treatment method. METHODS We examined 370 patients with pathological T1 CRC treated between 2000 and 2015 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. In total, 93 patients underwent endoscopic resection (ER) only, 82 underwent additional surgery after ER, and 175 underwent surgical resection only. Patients who did not meet the curative criteria were defined as "high-risk." High-risk patients were classified into three groups according to the treatment modalities: ER only (Group A: 35 patients), additional surgery after ER (Group B: 72 patients), and surgical resection only (Group C: 133 patients). The recurrence-free and overall survival (OS) rates, and factors associated with recurrence and mortality, were analyzed. Factors associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) were subjected to multivariate analysis. RESULTS Of the 370 patients, 7 experienced recurrence and 7 died. All recurrences occurred in the high-risk group and two deaths were in the low-risk group. In high-risk groups, there was no significant group difference in recurrence-free survival (P = 0.511) or OS (P =0.657). Poor histology (P =0.042) was associated with recurrence, and vascular invasion (P =0.044) with mortality. LNMs were observed in 30 of 277 patients who underwent surgery either initially or secondarily. Lymphatic invasion was significantly associated with the incidence of LNM (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ER prior to surgery did not affect the prognosis of high-risk T1 CRC patients, and did not worsen the clinical outcomes of patients who required additional surgery. Lymphatic invasion was the most important predictor of LNM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jin Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hoyeon Ju
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeoido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsu Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bo-In Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Hak Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Daeyoun David Won
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Suk Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In Kyu Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Seok Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mueller J, Kuellmer A, Schiemer M, Thimme R, Schmidt A. Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection with the full-thickness resection device. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:232-242. [PMID: 35997598 DOI: 10.1111/den.14425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is an integral part of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Since its market launch in Europe in 2014, its safety and effectiveness have been proven in numerous studies. Adaptations in design as well as new techniques, such as hybrid EFTR, expand the spectrum of the FTRD system. The following review is intended to provide an overview of the clinical application and current evidence of EFTR with the FTRD system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Mueller
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Armin Kuellmer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Schiemer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Robert Thimme
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010239. [PMID: 36612232 PMCID: PMC9818149 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In this review, we summarize up-to-date reports with five-year observation after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Five-year cause-specific survival rates ranged from 98.6 to 100%. The local recurrence rates ranged from 1.1 to 2.2% in complete resection and 7.5 to 25.0% in incomplete resection. Incomplete resection was a risk factor for local recurrence. In non-curative ESD, five-year cause-specific survival rates ranged from 93.8 to 100% with additional surgery, and 92.7 to 99.1% without surgery. The choice of additional surgery should be based on the individual patient's age, concomitant diseases, wishes, life expectancy, and the risk of lymph node metastasis. The metachronous cancer rates ranged from 0.22 to 1.1%. Both local recurrence and metachronous tumors should be checked with a follow-up colonoscopy after ESD.
Collapse
|
18
|
Son GM, Park SB, Kim TU, Park BS, Lee IY, Na JY, Shin DH, Oh SB, Cho SH, Kim HS, Kim HW. Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version. J Anus Rectum Colon 2022; 6:203-212. [PMID: 36348951 PMCID: PMC9613418 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2022-046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment for early colon cancer has progressed rapidly, with endoscopic resection and minimally invasive surgery. It is important to select patients without risk of lymph node metastasis before deciding on endoscopic resection for early colon cancer treatment. Pathological risk factors include histologic grade of cancer cell differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and deep submucosal invasion. These risk factors for predicting lymph node metastasis are crucial for determining the treatment strategy of endoscopic excision and radical resection for early colon cancer. A multidisciplinary approach is emphasized to establish a treatment strategy for early colon cancer to minimize the risk of complications and obtain excellent oncologic outcomes by selecting an appropriate treatment optimized for the patient's stage and condition. Therefore, we aimed to review the optimal multidisciplinary treatment strategies, including endoscopy and surgery, for early colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyung Mo Son
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Su Bum Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Tae Un Kim
- Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Byung-Soo Park
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - In Young Lee
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Joo-Young Na
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Shin
- Department of Pathology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Sang Bo Oh
- Department of Hemato-oncology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Sung Hwan Cho
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Hyun Sung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Hyung Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Son GM, Park SB, Kim TU, Park BS, Lee IY, Na JY, Shin DH, Oh SB, Cho SH, Kim HS, Kim HW. Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2022. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2022.65.9.558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Treatment for early colon cancer has progressed rapidly with endoscopic resection and minimally invasive surgery. Selection of patients without risk of lymph node metastasis is necessary before deciding on endoscopic resection for early colon cancer treatment. We aimed to review the optimal multidisciplinary treatment strategies for early colon cancer, including endoscopy and surgery.Current Concepts: Pathological risk factors include histologic grade of cancer cell differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and deep submucosal invasion. These risk factors for predicting lymph node metastasis are crucial for determining the treatment strategy of endoscopic excision and radical resection for early colon cancer. Prediction of the depth of invasion in early colon cancer using endoscopic optical assessments is vital to determine the appropriate treatment method for endoscopic or surgical resection. Furthermore, optical assessment of pit and vascular patterns is useful for estimating the depth of submucosal invasion using magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging endoscopy. Performing an endoscopic and pathologic evaluation of the risk factors for lymph node metastasis is imperative when selecting endoscopic or surgical resection. Endoscopic treatments include cold snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. In addition, appropriate surgical treatment should be recommended for patients with early colon cancer with a high risk of lymph node metastasis.Discussion and Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach should be recommended to establish an optimized treatment strategy, minimize the risk of complications, and obtain excellent oncologic outcomes via patienttailored treatment in patients with early colon cancer.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zwager LW, Bastiaansen BAJ, Montazeri NSM, Hompes R, Barresi V, Ichimasa K, Kawachi H, Machado I, Masaki T, Sheng W, Tanaka S, Togashi K, Yasue C, Fockens P, Moons LMG, Dekker E. Deep Submucosal Invasion Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:174-189. [PMID: 35436498 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Deep submucosal invasion (DSI) is considered a key risk factor for lymph node metastasis (LNM) and important criterion to recommend surgery in T1 colorectal cancer. However, metastatic risk for DSI is shown to be low in the absence of other histologic risk factors. This meta-analysis determines the independent risk of DSI for LNM. METHODS Suitable studies were included to establish LNM risk for DSI in univariable analysis. To assess DSI as independent risk factor, studies were eligible if risk factors (eg, DSI, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and high-grade tumor budding) were simultaneously included in multivariable analysis or LNM rate of DSI was described in absence of poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and high-grade tumor budding. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS Sixty-seven studies (21,238 patients) were included. Overall LNM rate was 11.2% and significantly higher for DSI-positive cancers (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.10-3.18). Eight studies (3621 patients) were included in multivariable meta-analysis and did not weigh DSI as a significant predictor for LNM (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.96-3.12). As opposed to a significant association between LNM and poor differentiation (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.39-3.28), high-grade tumor budding (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.06-3.88), and lymphovascular invasion (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.88-5.33). Eight studies (1146 patients) analyzed DSI as solitary risk factor; absolute risk of LNM was 2.6% and pooled incidence rate was 2.83 (95% CI, 1.66-4.78). CONCLUSIONS DSI is not a strong independent predictor for LNM and should be reconsidered as a sole indicator for oncologic surgery. The expanding armamentarium for local excision as first-line treatment prompts serious consideration in amenable cases to tailor T1 colorectal cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselotte W Zwager
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara A J Bastiaansen
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Nahid S M Montazeri
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Cancer Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valeria Barresi
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Katsuro Ichimasa
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Tsuzuki, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kawachi
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Isidro Machado
- Pathology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología and Patologika Laboratory Hospital Quiron Salud, Valencia, Spain
| | - Tadahiko Masaki
- Department of Surgery, Kyorin University, Shinkawa, Mitaka City, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Weiqi Sheng
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazutomo Togashi
- Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Chihiro Yasue
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Paul Fockens
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hong SW, Byeon JS. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. Intest Res 2022; 20:281-290. [PMID: 35916019 PMCID: PMC9344247 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2021.00169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Early colorectal cancer refers to cancer in the colorectum that is confined to the mucosa or submucosa and does not invade the muscularis propria, irrespective of lymph node or distant metastasis. As the number of persons undergoing screening colonoscopy increases, the proportion of patients diagnosed with precancerous colorectal lesions and early colorectal cancer also increases. In the last decade, innovative optical technologies for endoscopic diagnosis have been introduced and endoscopic treatment techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection have provided major breakthroughs in the management of early colorectal cancer. With these remarkable developments, endoscopic treatment has established itself as an alternative to surgical resection in the treatment of early colorectal cancer. This review will discuss the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the unmet needs in this field and the latest research addressing those issues will be summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Wook Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bhandari P, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, van Hooft JE, Deprez PH, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54:591-622. [PMID: 35523224 DOI: 10.1055/a-1811-7025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 209] [Impact Index Per Article: 104.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
ESGE recommends that the evaluation of superficial gastrointestinal (GI) lesions should be made by an experienced endoscopist, using high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based).ESGE does not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection.ESGE recommends endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the treatment of choice for most superficial esophageal squamous cell and superficial gastric lesions.For Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated lesions, ESGE suggests the use of ESD for lesions suspicious of submucosal invasion (Paris type 0-Is, 0-IIc), for malignant lesions > 20 mm, and for lesions in scarred/fibrotic areas.ESGE does not recommend routine use of ESD for duodenal or small-bowel lesions.ESGE suggests that ESD should be considered for en bloc resection of colorectal (but particularly rectal) lesions with suspicion of limited submucosal invasion (demarcated depressed area with irregular surface pattern or a large protruding or bulky component, particularly if the lesions are larger than 20 mm) or for lesions that otherwise cannot be completely removed by snare-based techniques.ESGE recommends that an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with histology no more advanced than intramucosal cancer (no more than m2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma), well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion or ulceration, should be considered a very low risk (curative) resection, and no further staging procedure or treatment is generally recommended.ESGE recommends that the following should be considered to be a low risk (curative) resection and no further treatment is generally recommended: an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with superficial submucosal invasion (sm1), that is well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion, of size ≤ 20 mm for an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or ≤ 30 mm for a stomach lesion or of any size for a BE-related or colorectal lesion, and with no lymphovascular invasion, and no budding grade 2 or 3 for colorectal lesions.ESGE recommends that, after an endoscopically complete resection, if there is a positive horizontal margin or if resection is piecemeal, but there is no submucosal invasion and no other high risk criteria are met, this should be considered a local-risk resection and endoscopic surveillance or re-treatment is recommended rather than surgery or other additional treatment.ESGE recommends that when there is a diagnosis of lymphovascular invasion, or deeper infiltration than sm1, or positive vertical margins, or undifferentiated tumor, or, for colorectal lesions, budding grade 2 or 3, this should be considered a high risk (noncurative) resection, and complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments should be considered on an individual basis in a multidisciplinary discussion.ESGE recommends scheduled endoscopic surveillance with high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based) with biopsies of only the suspicious areas after a curative ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Porto Faculty of Medicine, Portugal
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Barbara A J Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia and Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gianluca Esposito
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Bayern, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, St. John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
- MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ge PS, Aihara H. Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:1521-1538. [PMID: 35246802 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07392-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic resection is first-line therapy in the management of superficial neoplasms throughout the gastrointestinal tract, as well as an increasingly viable therapeutic alternative in the resection of selected small deep lesions throughout the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. The mainstay of therapy has traditionally been endoscopic snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection. However, recent innovative advancements in therapeutic endoscopy have provided for the ability to resect large superficial lesions and selected subepithelial lesions in en bloc and margin-negative fashion. In this review, we discuss the current state of the art in advanced endoscopic resection techniques including endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip S Ge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1466, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
S. Al Ghamdi S, Leeds I, Fang S, Ngamruengphong S. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic and Surgical Management of Rectal Neoplasia. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040948. [PMID: 35205695 PMCID: PMC8869910 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer demonstrates a characteristic natural history in which benign rectal neoplasia precedes malignancy. The worldwide burden of rectal cancer is significant, with rectal cancer accounting for one-third of colorectal cancer cases annually. The importance of early detection and successful management is essential in decreasing its clinical burden. Minimally invasive treatment of rectal neoplasia has evolved over the past several decades, which has led to reduced local recurrence rates and improved survival outcomes. The approach to diagnosis, staging, and selection of appropriate treatment modalities is a multidisciplinary effort combining interventional endoscopy, surgery, and radiology tools. This review examines the currently available minimally invasive endoscopic and surgical management options of rectal neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah S. Al Ghamdi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Ira Leeds
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA;
| | - Sandy Fang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA;
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Naffouje SA, Lauwers G, Klapman J, Dam A, Pena L, Friedman M, Sanchez J, Dessureault S, Felder S. Malignant colon polyps: predicting lymph node metastasis following endoscopic excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:393-402. [PMID: 35001147 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04078-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM The risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of malignant colon polyps (MCPs) is partly estimated by histologic features of the sampled polyp. However, the routinely available histologic data is limited to tumor grade and status of lymphovascular invasion (LVI). METHODS The NCDB for colon cancer 2004-2018 was utilized. Patients with pT1Nx adenocarcinoma arising in a polyp and undergoing partial colectomy with ≥ 12 retrieved nodes were selected. NCDB 2004-2017 was used as a training cohort to develop two scoring systems based on a multivariable regression for predictors of LNM including clinical characteristics, grade, and LVI: a nomogram scoring system (NSS) and a simplified scoring system (SSS). These models were internally validated using NCDB 2018 to calculate precision metrics for each model. RESULTS Six thousand sixty-nine patients were selected in the training cohort. 64.5% of MCPs were in the sigmoid, and LNM rate was 11.2%. Multivariable regression identified younger age, females, hindgut location, higher grade, and LVI as significant predictors of LNM. LNM risk was 1.2% when all unfavorable predictors were absent and exceeded 10% when NSS > 70 or SSS ≥ 3. In the 2018 validation cohort, 723 patients were scored per NSS and SSS, and the negative predictive value for both was 96%. CONCLUSION Estimating LNM risk in MCPs by applying clinical characteristics along with limited histologic data can help inform decision-making when considering formal oncologic resection. The NSS and SSS demonstrated comparable predictability of LNM among pT1Nx MCPs. The models require external validation and may be strengthened by incorporating additional endoscopic and pathologic characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer A Naffouje
- GI Oncology Program, Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, CSB 8165, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Gregory Lauwers
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jason Klapman
- GI Oncology Program, Gastroenterology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Aamir Dam
- GI Oncology Program, Gastroenterology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Luis Pena
- GI Oncology Program, Gastroenterology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mark Friedman
- GI Oncology Program, Gastroenterology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Julian Sanchez
- GI Oncology Program, Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, CSB 8165, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- GI Oncology Program, Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, CSB 8165, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Seth Felder
- GI Oncology Program, Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, CSB 8165, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Symer M, Connolly J, Yeo H. Management of the Malignant Colorectal Polyp. Curr Probl Surg 2022; 59:101124. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2022.101124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
27
|
Mann R, Gajendran M, Umapathy C, Perisetti A, Goyal H, Saligram S, Echavarria J. Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:728704. [PMID: 35127735 PMCID: PMC8811151 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupinder Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Agnes Medical Center, Fresno, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Rupinder Mann
| | - Mahesh Gajendran
- Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, United States
| | - Chandraprakash Umapathy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Hemant Goyal
- The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA, United States
| | - Shreyas Saligram
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Juan Echavarria
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Saraiva S, Rosa I, Fonseca R, Pereira AD. Colorectal malignant polyps: a modern approach. Ann Gastroenterol 2022; 35:17-27. [PMID: 34987284 PMCID: PMC8713339 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal malignant polyps (MP) are polyps with invasive cancer into the submucosa harboring a variable risk of lymph node involvement, which can be estimated through evaluation of morphological, endoscopic, and histologic features. The recent advances in imaging endoscopic techniques have led to the possibility of performing an optical diagnosis of T1 colorectal cancer, allowing the selection of the best therapeutic modality to optimize outcomes for the patient. When MP are diagnosed after endoscopic removal, their management can be challenging. Differentiating low- and high-risk histologic features that influence the possibility of residual tumor, the risk of recurrence and the risk of lymph node metastasis, is crucial to further optimize treatment and surveillance plans. While the presence of high-risk features indicates a need for surgery in the majority of cases, location, comorbidities and the patient’s preference should be taken in account when making the final decision. This is a particularly important issue in the management of low rectal MP presenting with high-risk features, where chemoradiotherapy followed by a watch-and-wait strategy has demonstrated promising results. In this review we discuss the important prognostic features of MP and the most modern approaches regarding their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Saraiva
- Gastroenterology Department (Sofia Saraiva, Isadora Rosa, António Dias Pereira)
| | - Isadora Rosa
- Gastroenterology Department (Sofia Saraiva, Isadora Rosa, António Dias Pereira)
| | - Ricardo Fonseca
- Pathology Department (Ricardo Fonseca), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mathews AA, Draganov PV, Yang D. Endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: From benign to malignant polyps. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13:356-370. [PMID: 34630886 PMCID: PMC8474698 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i9.356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer related death in the world. The early detection and removal of CRC precursor lesions has been shown to reduce the incidence of CRC and cancer-related mortality. Endoscopic resection has become the first-line treatment for the removal of most precursor benign colorectal lesions and selected malignant polyps. Detailed lesion assessment is the first critical step in the evaluation and management of colorectal polyps. Polyp size, location and both macro- and micro- features provide important information regarding histological grade and endoscopic resectability. Benign polyps and even malignant polyps with superficial submucosal invasion and favorable histological features can be adequately removed endoscopically. When compared to surgery, endoscopic resection is associated with lower morbidity, mortality, and higher patient quality of life. Conversely, malignant polyps with deep submucosal invasion and/or high risk for lymph node metastasis will require surgery. From a practical standpoint, the most appropriate strategy for each patient will need to be individualized, based not only on polyp- and patient-related characteristics, but also on local resources and expertise availability. In this review, we provide a broad overview and present a potential decision tree algorithm for the evaluation and management of colorectal polyps that can be widely adopted into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April A Mathews
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Keihanian T, Othman MO. Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Update on Best Practice. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14:317-330. [PMID: 34377006 PMCID: PMC8349195 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s249869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a method of en-bloc resection of neoplastic colorectal lesions which is less invasive compared to surgical resection. Lesion stratification, architecture recognition and estimation of depth of invasion are crucial for patient selection. Expert endoscopists have integrated a variety of classification systems including Paris, lateral spreading tumor (LST), narrow band imaging (NBI), international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) and Japanese NBI expert team (JNET) in their day-to-day practice to enhance lesion detection accuracy. Major societies recommend ESD for LST-non granular (NG), Kudo-VI type, large depressed and protruded colonic lesions with shallow submucosal invasion. Chance of submucosal invasion enhances with increased depth as well as tumor location and size. In comparison to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD has a lowerl recurrence rate and higher curative resection rate, making it superior for larger colonic lesions management. Major complications such as bleeding and perforation could be seen in up to 11% and 16% of patients, respectively. In major Western countries, performing ESD is challenging due to limited number of expert providers, lack of insurance coverage, and unique patient characteristics such as higher BMI and higher percentage of previously manipulated lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Keihanian
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Park CH, Yang DH, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim JH, Min YW, Lee SH, Bae JH, Chung H, Choi KD, Park JC, Lee H, Kwak MS, Kim B, Lee HJ, Lee HS, Choi M, Park DA, Lee JY, Byeon JS, Park CG, Cho JY, Lee ST, Chun HJ. [Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 75:264-291. [PMID: 32448858 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2020.75.5.264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Wook Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jie-Hyun Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Yang Won Min
- Department of Gastroenterology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Hyung Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Bae
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunsoo Chung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kee Don Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Chul Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyuk Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Seob Kwak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bun Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Seung Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Ah Park
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Yeul Lee
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Guk Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cha University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Soo Teik Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Hoon Jai Chun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Naito A, Iwamoto K, Ohtsuka M, Imasato M, Nakahara Y, Mikamori M, Furukawa K, Moon J, Asaoka T, Kishi K, Akamatsu H. Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Pathological T1b Colorectal Cancer. In Vivo 2021; 35:987-991. [PMID: 33622893 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM) of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) with a submucosal (SM) invasion depth of 1000 µm or more can reach 12.5%, which is the most common reason for additional resection in daily practice. Other studies have reported that the rate of LNM is less than 2%, regardless of the depth of invasion, if the lesions show good histology, lymphovascular infiltration is negative, and tumor budding is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate new risk factors for LNM in T1b colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS The 239 patients who were diagnosed with pathological T1b CRC after colorectal surgical resection at the Osaka Police Hospital in Japan between January 2008 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed in this study. RESULTS The LNM rate was 11.3% (27/239). The variables identified as being significant factors using multivariate analysis were: i) lymphatic invasion (Ly)-positive [odds ratio (OR)=5.97; 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.27-15.74], ii) female gender (OR=3.49; 95%CI=1.38-8.85), and iii) left-sided colorectal involvement (OR=4.98; 95%CI=1.22-20.39). If none of these risk factors were present with T1b, the LNM rate was 0% (0/28). CONCLUSIONS Ly-positive, female gender, and left-sided colorectal involvement could be risk factors for LNM in T1b CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Naito
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuya Iwamoto
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Kenta Furukawa
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jeongho Moon
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kentaro Kishi
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Galuppini F, Fassan M, Mastracci L, Gafà R, Lo Mele M, Lazzi S, Remo A, Parente P, D'Amuri A, Mescoli C, Tatangelo F, Lanza G. The histomorphological and molecular landscape of colorectal adenomas and serrated lesions. Pathologica 2021; 113:218-229. [PMID: 34294939 PMCID: PMC8299322 DOI: 10.32074/1591-951x-270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The 2019 WHO classification of digestive system tumors significantly reformed the classificatory definition of serrated lesions of the colorectal mucosa and added new essential diagnostic criteria for both conventional adenomas and hereditary gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Histopathological examination of colorectal adenocarcinoma precursors lesions represents an important segment of daily clinical practice in a pathology department and is essential for the implementation of current colorectal adenocarcinoma secondary prevention strategies. This overview will focus on a schematic histopathological and molecular classification of precursor lesions arising within colorectal mucosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Galuppini
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Fassan
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Italy.,Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Luca Mastracci
- Anatomic Pathology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy.,Anatomic Pathology, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Roberta Gafà
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Marcello Lo Mele
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Italy
| | - Stefano Lazzi
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Andrea Remo
- Pathology Unit, Service Department, ULSS9 "Scaligera", Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Parente
- Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy
| | | | - Claudia Mescoli
- Surgical Pathology Unit, Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Italy
| | - Fabiana Tatangelo
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lanza
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa independently affects long-term survival of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients. Surg Oncol 2021; 37:101611. [PMID: 34090103 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The significance of postoperatively diagnosed Lymphangiosis Carcinomatosa (L1) as an independent risk factor for long-term survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We analyzed the effect of L1 on postoperative survival in stage I, II and III NSCLC-patients. METHODS We investigated all consecutive patients with NSCLC between January 2012 and December 2019 who underwent an anatomical resection and radical lymphadenectomy at our institute. L1-were compared to L0-patients. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy in accordance with European guidelines. 3- and 5- year survival rates and median-survival were assessed. To investigate whether L1 is an independent risk factor, we carried out a multivariate cox regression and a pair-match analysis looking at different properties such as TNM. RESULTS A total of 641 patients (L0: 74%; L1: 26%) were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The mean age was 65.3 ± 10.2 years and 64.9 ± 9.4 years in the L0 and L1-groups respectively (p-value = 0.703). 58.5% of L0-patients were male (L1: 62.7%; p-value = 0.351). Overall survival in the L1-group was significantly shorter compared to the L0-group (L1: 42.3 ± 2.8; L0: 67.6 ± 2.1 months; p-value<0.0001). We confirmed this finding in a pair-matched analysis (L0: 73.9 ± 4.7 months; L1: 42.2 ± 4.2; p-value = 0.009). 3- and 5-year survival were significantly shorter for L1-patients (3-year: L0: 65.9%; L1: 35.9%; p-value<0.0001) (5-year: L0: 34.9%; L1: 7.5%; p-value<0.0001). CONCLUSION L1 is an independent risk factor for long-term survival of patients with NSCLC. This cohort supports that the L0/L1 status should be included in pathological reports. We suggest to further include L0/L1-status in guideline recommendations for NSCLC patients.
Collapse
|
35
|
Gao Z, Cao H, Xu X, Wang Q, Wu Y, Lu Q. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in stage II colorectal cancer patients with an inadequate examination of lymph nodes. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:125. [PMID: 33866973 PMCID: PMC8054379 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02224-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is defined as the presence of cancer cells in lymphatics or blood vessels. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LVI in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with inadequate examination of lymph nodes (ELNs) and further combined LVI with the TNM staging system to determine the predictive efficacy for CRC prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was then evaluated for stage II CRC patients with LVI positivity (LVI+). METHODS In order to avoid the effects of different ACT regimens, among 409 stage II patients, we chose 121 patients who received FOLFOX regimen and the 144 patients who did not receive ACT as the object of study. LVI was examined by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. Kaplan-Meier analysis followed by a log-rank test was used to analyze survival rates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate the accuracy of different systems in predicting prognosis. RESULTS The LVI+ status was significantly associated with pT stage, degree of differentiation, tumor stage, serum CEA and CA19-9 levels, perineural invasion (PNI), tumor budding (TB), and KRAS status. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of stage II patients with < 12 ELNs and LVI+ was less than stage IIIA. Multivariate analyses showed that LVI, pT-stage, serum CEA and CA19-9 levels, PNI, TB, and KRAS status were significant prognostic factors for stage II patients with < 12 ELNs. The 8th TNM staging system combined with LVI showed a higher C-index than the 8th TNM staging system alone (C-index, 0.895 vs. 0.833). Among patients with LVI+, the ACT group had a significantly higher 5-year OS and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) than the surgery alone (SA) group (5-year OS, 66.7% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.004; 5-year DFS, 64.1% vs. 36.3%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS LVI is an independent prognostic risk factor for stage II CRC patients. Combining LVI with the 8th TNM staging system improved the predictive accuracy for CRC prognosis. ACT in stage II CRC patients with LVI+ is beneficial for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyan Gao
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Huihua Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiang Xu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yugang Wu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Qicheng Lu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, 185 Juqian Street, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cheng P, Lu Z, Huang F, Zhang M, Chen H, Zheng Z. Does Additional Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Affect Short Outcomes in Patients with Stage T1 Colorectal Cancer? A Propensity Score-Based Analysis. Dig Surg 2021; 38:198-204. [PMID: 33774616 DOI: 10.1159/000509170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Additional surgery is necessary in cases with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection. It is still unknown whether preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for T1 colorectal carcinoma affects the short outcomes of patients who underwent additional surgery or not as compared with surgery alone without ESD. METHODS Patients (101 pairs) with T1 colorectal cancer who underwent additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (additional surgery group, n = 101) or laparoscopic-assisted surgery alone (surgery alone group, n = 101) were matched (1:1). Short-term morbidity, operation outcomes, and lymph node metastasis of the resected specimen were compared. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic-assisted surgery alone groups in lymph node metastasis (9.9 vs. 5.9%, respectively, p = 0.297), operative time (147.76 ± 52.00 min vs. 156.50 ± 54.28 min, p = 0.205), first flatus time (3.56 ± 1.10 days vs. 3.63 ± 1.05 days, p = 0.282), first stool time (4.30 ± 1.04 days vs. 4.39 ± 1.22 days, p = 0.293), time to intake (5.00 ± 1.18 days vs. 5.25 ± 1.39 days, p = 0.079), blood loss (44.75 ± 45.40 mL vs. 60.40 ± 78.98 mL, p = 0.603), harvest lymph nodes (18.74 ± 7.22 vs. 20.32 ± 9.69, p = 0.438), postoperative surgical complications (p = 0.733), and postoperative length of hospital stay (8.68 ± 4.00 days vs. 8.39 ± 1.94 days, p = 0.401). CONCLUSION ESD did not increase the difficulty of additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery, hospital stay, or the incidence of postoperative complications. Additional laparoscopic-assisted surgery is safe and recommended for patients with T1 cancer at high risk of lymph node metastasis and residual cancer after non-curative ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pu Cheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhao Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mingguang Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Haipeng Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhaoxu Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Surgical resection after endoscopic resection in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:457-466. [PMID: 33111966 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03752-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic resection (ER) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) allows a complete staging and may decrease the recurrence rate, but no meta-analysis is available. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ER vs. ER + ASR as a treatment for patients with T1 (stage 1) CRC. METHODS We performed a systematic search from databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library) for cohort studies published up to November 2019. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), local recurrence, recurrence, disease-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and metastasis. RESULTS Seven studies were included. There were 1205 patients in the ASR group and 993 patients in the ER group. Compared with ER, ASR was associated with better OS (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.53, P < 0.001) and a borderline significant difference in lower local recurrence rates (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.08-1.01, P = 0.052), but no differences were observed in recurrences, disease-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis. A sensitivity analysis was performed; excluding each study sequentially from the pooled analysis did not affect the overall conclusion of the study. CONCLUSION Compared with ER, ASR after ER could improve the overall survival for patients with T1 CRC.
Collapse
|
38
|
Advocating a Standardized Approach to the Assessment of Rectal Polyps Endoscopically. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:21-23. [PMID: 33306527 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
39
|
Shaukat A, Kaltenbach T, Dominitz JA, Robertson DJ, Anderson JC, Cruise M, Burke CA, Gupta S, Lieberman D, Syngal S, Rex DK. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:1916-1934.e2. [PMID: 33159840 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aasma Shaukat
- Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Veterans Affairs San Francisco, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- Vetearns Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Vetearns Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Samir Gupta
- San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California; University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - David Lieberman
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Shaukat A, Kaltenbach T, Dominitz JA, Robertson DJ, Anderson JC, Cruise M, Burke CA, Gupta S, Lieberman D, Syngal S, Rex DK. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:997-1015.e1. [PMID: 33160507 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aasma Shaukat
- Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Veterans Affairs San Francisco, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- Vetearns Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Vetearns Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Samir Gupta
- San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California; University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - David Lieberman
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon; Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shaukat A, Kaltenbach T, Dominitz JA, Robertson DJ, Anderson JC, Cruise M, Burke CA, Gupta S, Lieberman D, Syngal S, Rex DK. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115:1751-1767. [PMID: 33156093 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aasma Shaukat
- Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Veterans Affairs San Francisco, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jason A Dominitz
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Douglas J Robertson
- Vetearns Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Joseph C Anderson
- Vetearns Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
- University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Samir Gupta
- San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
- University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - David Lieberman
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Park CH, Yang DH, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim JH, Min YW, Lee SH, Bae JH, Chung H, Choi KD, Park JC, Lee H, Kwak MS, Kim B, Lee HJ, Lee HS, Choi M, Park DA, Lee JY, Byeon JS, Park CG, Cho JY, Lee ST, Chun HJ. Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. Intest Res 2020; 19:127-157. [PMID: 33045799 PMCID: PMC8100377 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2020.00020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Wook Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jie-Hyun Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Yang Won Min
- Department of Gastroenterology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Hyung Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Bae
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunsoo Chung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kee Don Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Chul Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyuk Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Seob Kwak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bun Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Seung Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Ah Park
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Yeul Lee
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Guk Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cha University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Soo Teik Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Hoon Jai Chun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
pT1 Colorectal Cancer Detected in a Colorectal Cancer Mass Screening Program: Treatment and Factors Associated with Residual and Extraluminal Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092530. [PMID: 32899974 PMCID: PMC7565413 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Our study has evaluated the burden of pT1 CRC (confined to submucosa) detected during the first round of a CRC screening program, the surgery related complications and the factors related to four relevant outcomes: initial endoscopic resection, surgery rescue and residual disease after endoscopic resection and, finally, extraluminal disease after surgical resection. 38% of the CRC were detected in this stage.74.9% were initially resected endoscopically and 43.8% did not require surgery. There were inhospital surgical complications in 30.7%, mainly mild with no death and complications after discharge in 16.3% of the patients Residual disease was detected in 12 (4.3%) after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease in 18 (8.6%) patients after surgery. We have determined several variables independently associated with the four outcome variables evaluated. Abstract The aim of this study is to describe the treatment of pT1 colorectal cancer (CRC) in a mass screening program, the surgery-related complications and the factors associated with residual disease after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease after surgery. We included in this retrospective analysis all the pT1 CRC detected in the Galician CRC screening program between May 2013 and June 2019. We determined which variables were independently associated with the outcomes of the study through a multivariable logistic regression analysis. We included 370–354 pT1 N0(X), 16 pT1N1- out of the 971 CRC detected; 277 (74.9%) were resected endoscopically and 162 (43.8%) were not referred to surgery. There were surgical complications in 30.7% and 16.3% of the patients during hospitalization and after discharge. Residual disease was detected in 12 (4.3%) after endoscopic resection and extraluminal disease in 18 (8.6%) patients after surgery. The variables independently associated with initial endoscopic resection were a pedunculated morphology (OR 33.1, 95% CI 4.3–254), a diameter ≥ 20 mm (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.39–11.18) and a Site–Morphology–Size–Access score < 9 (OR 428, 95% CI 42–4263). The variables related with surgery rescue were a piecemeal resection (OR 4.48, 95% CI 1.48–13.6), an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 7.44, 95% CI 2.12–26.0), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.07–20.0), vascular infiltration (OR 8.24, 95% CI 2.72–25.0) and a Haggitt 4 infiltration of the submucosa (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.62–12.3). Residual disease after endoscopic resection was associated with an infiltrated/nonevaluable resection border (OR 34.9, 95% CI 4.08–298), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 6.67, 95% CI 1.05–50.0), and the vascular infiltration of the submucosa (OR 7.61, 95% CI 1.55–37.4). The variables related with extraluminal disease after surgical resection were no endoscopic resection (OR 4.34, 95% CI 1.26–14.28), a non-well-differentiated histology (OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.39–14.29) and the lymphatic infiltration of the submucosa (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.32–17.8). In a CRC screening program, although most of pT1 CRC are candidates for endoscopic treatment, surgery is a safe procedure. We have defined some easy to evaluate variables that can be used in the decision-making process.
Collapse
|
44
|
Xu W, He Y, Wang Y, Li X, Young J, Ioannidis JPA, Dunlop MG, Theodoratou E. Risk factors and risk prediction models for colorectal cancer metastasis and recurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. BMC Med 2020; 18:172. [PMID: 32586325 PMCID: PMC7318747 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01618-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a clear need for systematic appraisal of models/factors predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis and recurrence because clinical decisions about adjuvant treatment are taken on the basis of such variables. METHODS We conducted an umbrella review of all systematic reviews of observational studies (with/without meta-analysis) that evaluated risk factors of CRC metastasis and recurrence. We also generated an updated synthesis of risk prediction models for CRC metastasis and recurrence. We cross-assessed individual risk factors and risk prediction models. RESULTS Thirty-four risk factors for CRC metastasis and 17 for recurrence were investigated. Twelve of 34 and 4/17 risk factors with p < 0.05 were estimated to change the odds of the outcome at least 3-fold. Only one risk factor (vascular invasion for lymph node metastasis [LNM] in pT1 CRC) presented convincing evidence. We identified 24 CRC risk prediction models. Across 12 metastasis models, six out of 27 unique predictors were assessed in the umbrella review and four of them changed the odds of the outcome at least 3-fold. Across 12 recurrence models, five out of 25 unique predictors were assessed in the umbrella review and only one changed the odds of the outcome at least 3-fold. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an in-depth evaluation and cross-assessment of 51 risk factors and 24 prediction models. Our findings suggest that a minority of influential risk factors are employed in prediction models, which indicates the need for a more rigorous and systematic model construction process following evidence-based methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Xu
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Yazhou He
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Yuming Wang
- Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan, 450003, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue Li
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Jane Young
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Statistics, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Malcolm G Dunlop
- Colon Cancer Genetics Group, Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Evropi Theodoratou
- Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Park CH, Yang DH, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim JH, Min YW, Lee SH, Bae JH, Chung H, Choi KD, Park JC, Lee H, Kwak MS, Kim B, Lee HJ, Lee HS, Choi M, Park DA, Lee JY, Byeon JS, Park CG, Cho JY, Lee ST, Chun HJ. Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF HELICOBACTER AND UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.7704/kjhugr.2020.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
Collapse
|
46
|
Park CH, Yang DH, Kim JW, Kim JH, Kim JH, Min YW, Lee SH, Bae JH, Chung H, Choi KD, Park JC, Lee H, Kwak MS, Kim B, Lee HJ, Lee HS, Choi M, Park DA, Lee JY, Byeon JS, Park CG, Cho JY, Lee ST, Chun HJ. Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer. Clin Endosc 2020; 53:142-166. [PMID: 32252507 PMCID: PMC7137564 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by <i>en bloc</i> fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Wook Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jie-Hyun Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Yang Won Min
- Department of Gastroenterology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Hyung Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Bae
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyunsoo Chung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kee Don Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Chul Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyuk Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Seob Kwak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bun Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Seung Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Ah Park
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Yeul Lee
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Guk Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Young Cho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cha University Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Soo Teik Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Hoon Jai Chun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Li M, Zhang J, Dan Y, Yao Y, Dai W, Cai G, Yang G, Tong T. A clinical-radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Transl Med 2020; 18:46. [PMID: 32000813 PMCID: PMC6993349 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02215-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Accurate lymph node metastasis (LNM) prediction in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is of great significance for treatment decision making and prognostic evaluation. We aimed to develop and validate a clinical-radiomics nomogram for the individual preoperative prediction of LNM in CRC patients. Methods We enrolled 766 patients (458 in the training set and 308 in the validation set) with clinicopathologically confirmed CRC. We included nine significant clinical risk factors (age, sex, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor size, tumor location, histotype, differentiation and M stage) to build the clinical model. We used analysis of variance (ANOVA), relief and recursive feature elimination (RFE) for feature selection (including clinical risk factors and the imaging features of primary lesions and peripheral lymph nodes), established classification models with logistic regression analysis and selected the respective candidate models by fivefold cross-validation. Then, we combined the clinical risk factors, primary lesion radiomics features and peripheral lymph node radiomics features of the candidate models to establish combined predictive models. Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) and a nomogram were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the model. Results The clinical-primary lesion radiomics-peripheral lymph node radiomics model, with the highest AUC value (0.7606), was regarded as the candidate model and had good discrimination and calibration in both the training and validation sets. DCA demonstrated that the clinical-radiomics nomogram was useful for preoperative prediction in the clinical environment. Conclusion The present study proposed a clinical-radiomics nomogram with a combination of clinical risk factors and radiomics features that can potentially be applied in the individualized preoperative prediction of LNM in CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menglei Li
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing Zhang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China
| | - Yibo Dan
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China
| | - Yefeng Yao
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China
| | - Weixing Dai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Guoxiang Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Guang Yang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, People's Republic of China.
| | - Tong Tong
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cho SJ, Kakar S. Tumor Budding in Colorectal Carcinoma: Translating a Morphologic Score Into Clinically Meaningful Results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019; 142:952-957. [PMID: 30040461 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0082-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT - Tumor budding has received increasing recognition as an important independent prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma. Prominent tumor budding in adenocarcinoma arising in a polyp has been shown to be a risk factor for lymph node involvement. The variability in methods used for evaluating tumor budding in different studies and lack of standardized guidelines have impeded routine inclusion of tumor budding in pathology reports. This changed last year with consensus guidelines based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC). These guidelines have been included in the recent College of American Pathologists (CAPs) Colorectal Cancer Protocol. The consensus methodology will allow uniform reporting of this finding, but challenges in interpretation in the setting of intense inflammation, fibrosis, or gland fragmentation need to be addressed in future guidelines. OBJECTIVE - To provide a brief overview of the known clinical significance of tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma and discuss the practical aspects of its implementation on a routine basis. DATA SOURCES - English-language pathology literature. CONCLUSIONS - Tumor budding has been shown to be an independent prognostic marker in colorectal carcinomas and the routine reporting of tumor buds is now advocated by using the approach outlined by the ITBCC guidelines. Tumor budding is included in the CAP protocol as a recommended element. Presence of prominent tumor budding in an adenocarcinoma in a polyp may have implications for management, such as additional resection, while it serves as a prognostic factor in other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanjay Kakar
- From the Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jiang HH, Zhang ZY, Wang XY, Tang X, Liu HL, Wang AL, Li HG, Tang EJ, Lin MB. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer and its association with genomic alterations. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:2489-2502. [PMID: 31171892 PMCID: PMC6543237 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i20.2489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is suggested to be an early and important step in tumor progression toward metastasis, but its prognostic value and genetic mechanisms in colorectal cancer (CRC) have not been well investigated.
AIM To investigate the prognostic value of LVI in CRC and identify the associated genomic alterations.
METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 1219 CRC patients and evaluated the prognostic value of LVI for overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis. We also performed an array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 47 fresh CRC samples to examine the genomic alterations associated with LVI. A decision tree model was applied to identify special DNA copy number alterations (DCNAs) for differentiating between CRCs with and without LVI. Functional enrichment and protein-protein interaction network analyses were conducted to explore the potential molecular mechanisms of LVI.
RESULTS LVI was detected in 150 (12.3%) of 1219 CRCs, and the presence was positively associated with higher histological grade and advanced tumor stage (both P < 0.001). Compared with the non-LVI group, the LVI group showed a 1.77-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.40-2.25, P < 0.001) increased risk of death and a significantly lower 5-year overall survival rate (P < 0.001). Based on the comparative genomic hybridization data, 184 DCNAs (105 gains and 79 losses) were identified to be significantly related to LVI (P < 0.05), and the majority were located at 22q, 17q, 10q, and 6q. We further constructed a decision tree classifier including seven special DCNAs, which could distinguish CRCs with LVI from those without it at an accuracy of 95.7%. Functional enrichment and protein-protein interaction network analyses revealed that the genomic alterations related to LVI were correlated with inflammation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, and matrix remodeling.
CONCLUSION LVI is an independent predictor for survival in CRC, and its development may correlate with inflammation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis, and matrix remodeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Hong Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
- Institute of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Zhuji People’s Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Zhuji 311800, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Wang
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Xuan Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
- Institute of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Hai-Long Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Ai-Li Wang
- Institute of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
- Center for Clinical Research and Translational Medicine, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Hua-Guang Li
- Institute of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
- Center for Clinical Research and Translational Medicine, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Er-Jiang Tang
- Institute of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
- Center for Clinical Research and Translational Medicine, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
| | - Mou-Bin Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
- Institute of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Translational Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
- Center for Clinical Research and Translational Medicine, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200090, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fragaki M, Voudoukis E, Chliara E, Dimas I, Mpitouli A, Velegraki M, Vardas E, Theodoropoulou A, Karmiris K, Giannikaki L, Paspatis G. Complete endoscopic mucosal resection of malignant colonic sessile polyps and clinical outcome of 51 cases. Ann Gastroenterol 2019; 32:174-177. [PMID: 30837790 PMCID: PMC6394258 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2018.0343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Meta-analyses and guidelines recommend that deep submucosal invasion (>1 mm) of malignant sessile colonic polyps is an important risk factor for lymph node metastasis. However, existing data are based on small retrospective studies with marked heterogeneity. We herein aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent complete endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of malignant colonic sessile polyps invading the submucosal layer. Methods Endoscopy records for the period 2000-2016 were reviewed retrospectively. All enrolled patients exhibited an endoscopically resected malignant colonic sessile polyp. All patients were advised to undergo surgery, but some opted for conservative treatment and endoscopic follow up. Results Fifty-one patients with confirmed infiltrative submucosal adenocarcinoma in sessile colonic polyps that had undergone complete EMR were detected. A total of 32 (62.7%) patients opted for surgery after EMR and 19 (37.3%) chose endoscopic follow up. In 44 (86.3%) patients the submucosal invasion was >1 mm. Residual malignant disease was identified in the surgical pathological specimen of only 1 patient. During a median follow up of 23.41 months (interquartile range 33.45, range 1.84-144.92), no local recurrences or lymph node metastasis were identified. Forty-nine patients are alive without evidence of disease and 2 died of other causes (without evidence of local or metastatic disease at last follow up). Conclusion Our data suggest that complete EMR of cancerous colonic sessile polyps, even in cases of submucosal invasion >1 mm carries a low risk of recurrence and therefore may need further evaluation as an alternative strategy to surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Fragaki
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Evangelos Voudoukis
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Evdoxia Chliara
- Histopathology (Evdoxia Chliara, Linda Giannikaki), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Ioannis Dimas
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Afroditi Mpitouli
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Magdalini Velegraki
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Vardas
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Angeliki Theodoropoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Karmiris
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Linda Giannikaki
- Histopathology (Evdoxia Chliara, Linda Giannikaki), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Gregorios Paspatis
- Department of Gastroenterology (Maria Fragaki, Evangelos Voudoukis, Ioannis Dimas, Afroditi Mpitouli, Magdalini Velegraki, Emmanouil Vardas, Angeliki Theodoropoulou, Konstantinos Karmiris, Gregorios Paspatis), Venizeleion General Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|