Cardiac Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): a Multicenter Cohort Study

Oral ketone esters acutely improve myocardial contractility in post-hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study

Background

COVID-19 is associated with subclinical myocardial injury. Exogenous ketone esters acutely improve left myocardial function in healthy participants and patients with heart failure, but the effects have not been investigated in participants previously hospitalized for COVID-19.

Methods

This is a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study comparing a single oral ketone ester dose of 395 mg/kg with placebo. Fasting participants were randomized to either placebo in the morning and oral ketone ester in the afternoon or vice versa. Echocardiography was performed immediately after intake of the corresponding treatment. Primary outcome was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Secondary outcomes were absolute global longitudinal strain (GLS), cardiac output and blood oxygen saturation. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess differences.

Results

We included 12 participants previously hospitalized for COVID-19 with a mean (±SD) age of 60 ± 10 years. The mean time from hospitalization was 18 ± 5 months. Oral ketone esters did not increase LVEF between placebo and oral ketone ester [mean difference: -0.7% (95% CI -4.0 to 2.6%), p = 0.66], but increased GLS [1.9% (95% CI: 0.1 to 3.6%), p = 0.04] and cardiac output [1.2 L/min (95% CI: -0.1 to 2.4 L/min), p = 0.07], although non-significant. The differences in GLS remained significant after adjustment for change in heart rate (p = 0.01). There was no difference in blood oxygen saturation. Oral ketone esters increased blood ketones over time (peak level 3.1 ± 4.9 mmol/L, p < 0.01). Ketone esters increased blood insulin, c-peptide, and creatinine, and decreased glucose and FFA (all p ≤ 0.01) but did not affect glucagon, pro-BNP, or troponin I levels (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19, a single oral dose of ketone ester had no effect on LVEF, cardiac output or blood oxygen saturation, but increased GLS acutely.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04377035.

2D speckle-tracking echocardiography as a prognostic imaging modality for COVID-19 adverse outcomes

2D speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has been used to assess cardiac recovery during the COVID-19 patient follow-ups within the pandemic. The novel role of STE in predicting adverse outcomes of COVID-19 has received attention due to its high sensitivity in identifying subclinical myocardial dysfunction. We reviewed the studies on using 2D-STE to assess COVID-19 prognosis. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus for eligible articles, 24 of which discussed using prognostic 2D-STE for COVID-19 patients. 2D-STE predicts cardiovascular impairments more rapidly and precisely than conventional echocardiography. The 2D-STE technique presents an independent prognostic factor in COVID-19 infection. 2D-STE could be considered a time-efficient and accurate risk predictor of all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 and the cardiologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There continues to be extensive clinical and epidemiological data to suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with numerous different types of cardiac involvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Myocardial injury has been reported in over 25% of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection and is not only associated with a worse prognosis but with higher mortality, approaching 40%. Currently proposed mechanisms of myocardial injury include direct viral infection, cytokine storm, endothelial inflammation, demand ischemia, interferon-mediated response and stress cardiomyopathy. COVID-19 infection is associated with new-onset arrhythmias and heart failure regardless of history of previous cardiovascular disease. Echocardiographic findings can be useful to predict mortality in COVID-19 patients and cardiac MRI is an effective tool to both assess COVID-19 induced myocarditis and to follow-up on cardiac complications of COVID-19 long-term. Although there is an association between COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis, pericarditis or arrhythmias, the risk appears lower when compared to risk attributable to the natural infection.

SUMMARY

Patients with cardiovascular disease are not only more likely to suffer from severe COVID-19 infection but are at increased risk for further complications and higher mortality. Further data compilation on current and emerging treatments of COVID-19 will have additional impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 infection.

Feasibility, Prediction and Association of Right Ventricular Free Wall Longitudinal Strain with 30-Day Mortality in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Prospective Study

Introduction: Right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction (RVsD) is a common complication of coronavirus infection 2019 disease (COVID-19). The right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain parameter (RV-FWLS) is a powerful predictor of mortality. We explored the performance of RVsD parameters for predicting 30-day mortality and the association between RV-FWLS and 30-day mortality. Methods: COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Amiens University Hospital in the critical care unit with transthoracic echocardiography were included. We measured tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), the RV S’ wave, RV fractional area change (RV-FAC), and RV-FWLS. The diagnostic performance of RVsD parameters as predictors for 30-day mortality was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). RVsD was defined by an RV-FWLS < 21% to explore the association between RVsD and 30-day mortality. Results: Of the 116 patients included, 20% (n = 23/116) died and 47 had a RVsD. ROC curve analysis showed that RV-FWLS failed to predict 30-day mortality, as did conventional RV parameters (all p > 0.05). TAPSE (21 (19−26) mm vs. 24 (21−27) mm; p = 0.024) and RV-FAC (40 (35−47)% vs. 47 (41−55)%; p = 0.006) were lowered in the RVsD group. In Cox analysis, RVsD was not associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio = 1.12, CI 95% (0.49−2.55), p = 0.78). Conclusion: In severe COVID-19 pneumonia, RV-FWLS was not associated with 30-day mortality.

Biventricular myocardial function in Covid-19 recovered patients assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography: a prospective cohort echocardiography study

Although severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causes respiratory disease, it may also lead to cardiovascular involvement with unknown long-term consequences. The aim of our study was to evaluate prospectively cardiac involvement in patients after the recovery from Covid-19, using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. 100 Covid-19 recovered patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, were included, divided based upon clinical manifestation into two groups, those who were treated ambulant and those who were hospitalized. All patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation after their recovery. Although overall LV systolic function expressed by EF was normal, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) was significantly lower in Covid-19 recovered patients (33.28 ± 9.4 days after diagnosis) compared to controls (- 18.47 ± - 2.4 vs. - 21.07 ± - 1.76% respectively, p < 0.0001). Εspecially the lateral wall longitudinal strain (LATLS) and posterior wall longitudinal strain (POSTLS) were significantly reduced in all patients compared to controls (- 17.77 ± - 3.48 vs. - 20.97 ± - 2.86%, p < 0.0001 and - 19.52 ± - 5.3 vs. - 22.23 ± - 2.65%, p = 0.01). right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) was significantly diminished only in the hospitalized group of Covid-19 recovered patients, compared to controls (- 18.17 ± - 3.32 vs. - 26.03 ± - 4.55% respectively, p < 0.0001). LVGLS is affected in almost all individuals after Covid-19 infection independently of the infection severity, with LATLS being the most sensitive marker of LV impairment and with POSTLS to follow. RV shows impaired GLS in severely ill patients highlighting RVGLS as a helpful tool of prognosis. Recovered patients from Covid-19 infection have to be monitored for a long time, since the term "long Covid disease" might also include the cardiac function.

Systematic Review of Cardiovascular Manifestations in COVID-19 and Management Consideration

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a health problem that is still engulfing the world that contributes to the high mortality rate globally. Death arises from the severity of the disease due to complications in important organs such as the heart. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the manifestations of cardiovascular disease in COVID-19 patients and their management in terms of published articles. Method: This research is a systematic review research. The research was conducted using the PRISMA method. Article searches are carried out by online publications throughPubMed, Science Direct and Google Scholarthat meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The population is articles about the manifestations of cardiovascular disease in COVID-19 patients and their management between 2011 and 2021. Inclusion criteria are studies that examine the manifestations of cardiovascular disease in COVID-19 patients and their management using primary data in the form of cohort research designs, in English and full text available. The exclusion criteria were a case study, review study and used secondary data. The data were analyzed by univariate analysis by calculating the frequency and percentage. Result: The results show that several manifestations of cardiovascular disease in COVID-19 patients include cardiac injury, heart failure, myocardial infarction, myocarditis, cardiomegaly and others.Complications of these diseases occur with or without comorbidities and the risk increases with comorbid cardiovascular disease. The management of COVID-19 patients is basically done with antiviral agents, reducing symptoms and protecting important organs such as the heart. Conclusion: In the treatment of COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular complications, the use of antiviral agents such as lopinavir or ritonavir should be used with caution because: may interact with cardiovascular drugs. Mechanical circulation support is suggested and the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can also be performed totreat cardiovascular complications in COVID-19 patients. Keywords: COVID-19, cardiovascular, manifestation, management, systematic review.  

Echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle in COVID-19: a systematic review

Cardiac involvement has been frequently reported in COVID-19 as responsible of increased morbidity and mortality. Given the importance of right heart function in acute and chronic respiratory diseases, its assessment in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients may add prognostic accuracy. Transthoracic echocardiography has been proposed to early predict myocardial injury and risk of death in hospitalized patients. This systematic review presents the up-to-date sum of literature regarding right ventricle ultrasound assessment. We evaluated commonly used echocardiographic parameters to assess RV function and discussed their relationship with pathophysiological mechanisms involved in COVID-19. We searched Medline and Embase for studies that used transthoracic echocardiography for right ventricle assessment in patients with COVID-19.

Clinical impact of blood pressure variability in patients with COVID-19 and hypertension

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPV) and clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 136 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were enrolled in this study. Patients were grouped according to the presence of hypertension and BPV. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) measured at 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. was analyzed, and BPV was calculated as the coefficient of variation of MAP (MAPCV). High BPV was defined as MAPCV values above the median. We compared the age, level of C-reactive protein (CRP), creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatinine and in-hospital mortality and investigated the relationship among the groups.

RESULTS

COVID-19 patients with hypertension were older (70 ± 12 vs. 53 ± 17 years; P < 0.001), had higher levels of CRP (9.4 ± 9.2 vs. 5.3 ± 8.2 mg/dL; P = 0.009), MAPCV (11.4 ± 4.8 vs. 8.9 ± 3.2; P = 0.002), and higher in-hospital mortality (19.6% vs. 5.9%; P = 0.013) than those without hypertension. There was a proportional relationship between BPV and age, levels of CRP, CK-MB, NT-proBNP, creatinine and in-hospital mortality (all, P < 0.05). In Cox regression analysis, advanced age [≥80 years, hazard ratio (HR) 10.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.264-47.772, P = 0.003] and higher MAPCV (HR 1.617, 95% CI, 1.281-2.040, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

High BPV in COVID-19 patients with hypertension is significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Advanced age and systemic inflammation are proportional to high BPV. Additional attention is needed for COVID-19 patients with hypertension and high BPV.

Right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of prevalence and its association with clinical outcome

Introduction

Rapid spread of COVID-19 has caused detrimental effects globally. Involvement of the ACE2 receptor has identified COVID-19 as a multi-organ disease. Preliminary studies have provided evidence that cardiac involvement, including right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH), were found in COVID-19 cases, even in the non-advanced stage. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the prevalence of RVD and PH, and their association with COVID-19 clinical outcome.

Material and methods

A systematic data search was conducted through PubMed, medRxiv, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Scopus databases using constructed keywords based on MeSH terms. Any outcomes regarding mortality, severity, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation usage were analyzed using RevMan v.5.4 and Stata v.16.

Results

A total of 16 eligible studies (1,728 patients) were included. Pooled prevalence of RVD in COVID-19 was 19% (95% CI: 13-25%), and PH was 22% (95% CI: 14-31%). RVD was associated with increased mortality (OR = 2.98 (95% CI: 1.50-5.89), p = 0.002), severity (OR = 3.61 (95% CI: 2.05-6.35), p < 0.001), ICU admission (OR = 1.70 (95% CI: 1.12-2.56), p = 0.01), and mechanical ventilation (MV) usage (OR = 1.60 (95% CI: 1.14-2.25), p = 0.007). PH was also associated with increased mortality (OR = 5.42 (95% CI: 2.66-11.060, p < 0.001), severity (OR = 5.74 (95% CI: 2.28-14.49), p < 0.001), and ICU admission (OR = 12.83 (95% CI: 3.55-46.41), p < 0.001).

Conclusions

RVD and PH were prevalent in COVID-19 and associated with mortality, severity, ICU admission, and MV usage in COVID-19 patients. Bedside echocardiography examination could be considered as a novel risk stratification tool in COVID-19.

Left and right ventricular longitudinal strains are associated with poor outcome in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether ventricular longitudinal strain can be used as a prognostication tool in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS

Systematic literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and EuropePMC databases were performed on 16 November 2020. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) refers to LV contraction measurement using the speckle tracking-based method refers to the mean of strain values of the RV free wall (three segments) measured using echocardiography. The main outcome was poor outcome, defined as a composite of mortality and severe COVID-19.

RESULTS

Seven studies comprising of 612 patients were included in meta-analysis. Six studies have mortality as their outcome, and 1 study has severity as their outcome. Patients with poor outcome have lower LV-GLS (SMD 1.15 (0.57, 1.72), p < 0.001; I2 70.4%). Each 1% decrease in LV-GLS was associated with 1.4x increased risk of poor outcome (OR 1.37 (1.12, 1.67), p = 0.002; I2 48.8%). Patients with poor outcome have lower RV-LS (SMD 1.18 (0.91, 1.45), p < 0.001; I2 0%). Each 1% decrease in RV-LS was associated with 1.3x increased risk of poor outcome (OR 1.25 (1.15, 1.35), p < 0.001; I2 11.8%). Subgroup analysis showed that for every 1% decrease in LV-GLS and RV-LS is increased mortality with OR of 1.30 (1.12, 1.50) and OR of 1.24 (1.14, 1.35), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that lower LV-GLS and RV-LS measurements were associated with poor outcome in patients with COVID-19.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020221144.