Comparison of CT and 18F-FDG pet for detecting peritoneal metastasis on the preoperative evaluation for gastric carcinoma

Cross-sectional imaging of gastric cancer: pearls, pitfalls and lessons learned from multidisciplinary conference

Gastric cancer is rising in prevalence associated with high mortality, primarily due to late-stage detection, underscoring the imperative for early and precise diagnosis. Etiology involves an interplay of genetic susceptibilities and environmental factors with a prominent role of Helicobacter pylori infection. Due to its often-delayed symptom presentation, prompt and accurate diagnosis is necessary. A multimodal imaging approach, including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical for accurate staging. Each modality contributes unique advantages and limitations, highlighting the importance of integrating diagnostic strategy. Moreover, multidisciplinary conferences offer a vital collaborative platform, bringing together specialists from diverse fields for treatment planning. This synergistic approach not only enhances diagnostic precision but also improves patient outcome. This review highlights the critical role of imaging in diagnosis, staging, and management and advocates for interdisciplinary collaboration in early detection and comprehensive management of gastric cancer, aiming to reduce mortality.

Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of recurrent gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of disease recurrence after curative resection of gastric cancer.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases, from the earliest available date of indexing through November 30, 2019, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent disease after gastric cancer surgery.

RESULTS

Across 17 studies (1,732 patients), the pooled sensitivity for F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.88) with heterogeneity of I2=76.5 (p<0.001), and the specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91) with heterogeneity of I2=94.2 (p<0.001). Likelihood ratio (LR) tests gave an overall positive LR of 6.0 (95% CI, 3.6-9.7) and negative LR of 0.2 (95% CI, 0.14-0.31). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 29 (95% CI, 13-63). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicates that the area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93).

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis showed good sensitivity and specificity of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting recurrent disease after curative resection of gastric cancer despite heterogeneity in ethnicity, recurrence rate, histology, and interpretation method.

Systematic review of diagnostic tools for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer-staging laparoscopy and its alternatives

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer burden and mortality, often resulting in peritoneal metastasis in advanced stages with negative survival outcomes. Staging laparoscopy has become standard practice for suspected cases before a definitive gastrectomy or palliation. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of other diagnostic modalities instead of staging laparoscopy as the alternatives are able to reduce cost and invasive staging procedures. Recently, a radiomic model based on computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) has also emerged as another method to predict peritoneal metastasis.

AIM

To determine if the efficacy of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and PET is comparable with staging laparoscopy.

METHODS

Articles comparing computed tomography, PET, magnetic resonance imaging, and radiomic models based on computed tomography and PET to staging laparoscopies were filtered out from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Reference Citations Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/). In the search for studies comparing computed tomography (CT) to staging laparoscopy, five retrospective studies and three prospective studies were found. Similarly, five retrospective studies and two prospective studies were also included for papers comparing CT to PET scans. Only one retrospective study and one prospective study were found to be suitable for papers comparing CT to magnetic resonance imaging scans.

RESULTS

Staging laparoscopy outperformed computed tomography in all measured aspects, namely sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Magnetic resonance imaging and PET produced mixed results, with the former shown to be only marginally better than computed tomography. CT performed slightly better than PET in most measured domains, except in specificity and true negative rates. We speculate that this may be due to the limited F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in small peritoneal metastases and in linitis plastica. Radiomic modelling, in its current state, shows promise as an alternative for predicting peritoneal metastases. With further research, deep learning and radiomic modelling can be refined and potentially applied as a preoperative diagnostic tool to reduce the need for invasive staging laparoscopy.

CONCLUSION

Staging laparoscopy was superior in all measured aspects. However, associated risks and costs must be considered. Refinements in radiomic modelling are necessary to establish it as a reliable screening technique.

Efficacy of multi-slice spiral computed tomography in evaluating gastric cancer recurrence after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Recurrence is the major challenge facing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-based treatment therapies for early gastric cancer (EGC). Urgent development of simple and easy surveillance approaches will enhance clinical treatment of the disease.

AIM

To explore the role of computed tomography (CT) recurrence in evaluating EGC after ESD treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients from our endoscopy department, between January 2002 and December 2015, and analyzed their basic characteristics, including symptoms, CT results, and results of endoscopy with biopsy, among others.

RESULTS

Among a total of 2150 patients EGC patients surveyed, 1362 met our inclusion and exclusion criteria and were therefore enrolled in our study. The cohort's sensitivity of CT for recurrent GC and specificity were 44.22% and 43.86%, respectively, with negative and positive predictive values of 40.15% (275/685) and 48.01% (325/677), respectively. The area under the curve of arterial and venous CT values for recurrent EGC were 0.545, and 0.604, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed no statistically significant differences between arterial and venous CT values for recurrent EGC.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced CT has superior diagnostic efficacy, but less accuracy, compared to gold standard techniques in patients with recurrent EGC.

Head-To-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND. FDG PET/CT has limited diagnostic performance in the detection of peritoneal metastasis (PM). Gallium-68-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) targets tumor stroma, leading to high accumulation across cancer types. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performances of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT in detecting PM on the basis of studies providing head-to-head comparisons between the two tests. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through July 2022 to identify studies reporting head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT for detection of PM. The reference standard was classified as histopathology for all patients or as a combination of histopathologic, clinical, imaging, laboratory, and follow-up information (multidisciplinary reference standard). A random-effects statistical model was applied to conduct a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performances of the tests in patient-based and lesion-based analyses. The QUADAS-2 and QUADAS Comparative tools were used to assess study quality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Eleven studies were included. Patient-based analysis was reported in nine studies including 340 patients, and lesion-based analysis was reported in four studies including 222 lesions. The pooled sensitivity of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was significantly higher than that of FDG PET/CT in patient-based analysis (98.2% [95% CI, 96.1-100.0%] vs 55.9% [95% CI, 33.9-77.9%]) and lesion-based analysis (99.9% [95% CI, 99.5-100.0%] vs 27.3% [95% CI, 11.2-43.4%]). Eight studies were rated at high risk of bias in the reference standard domain because the multidisciplinary reference standard was not sufficiently explained and may have included one of the two index tests, which would have artificially increased sensitivity. In three studies specificity was reported as 100.0% for both tests; these studies were considered at uncertain risk of bias in the patient selection domain because patients with benign peritoneal conditions may have been excluded, resulting in underestimation of potential false-positive results. CONCLUSION. The current evidence suggests excellent sensitivity of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for the detection of PM in comparison with poorer sensitivity of FDG PET/CT. However, most included studies had high risk of bias. Further studies are needed to more convincingly characterize true- and false-positive results. CLINICAL IMPACT. The sensitivity of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT may be substantially greater than that of FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of PM, facilitating surgical planning and candidate selection.

Risk prediction model of peritoneal seeding in advanced gastric cancer: A decision tool for diagnostic laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

Selective diagnostic laparoscopy in gastric cancer patients at high risk of peritoneal metastasis is essential for optimal treatment planning. In this study available clinicopathologic factors predictive of peritoneal seeding in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) were identified, and this information was translated into a clinically useful tool.

METHODS

Totally 2833 patients underwent surgery for AGC between 2003 and 2013. The study identified clinicopathologic factors associated with the risk of peritoneal seeding for constructing nomograms using a multivariate logistic regression model with backward elimination. A nomogram was constructed to generate a numerical value indicating risk. Accuracy was validated using bootstrapping and cross-validation.

RESULTS

The proportion of seeding positive was 12.7% in females and 9.6% in males. Of 2833 patients who underwent surgery for AGC, 300 (10.6%) were intraoperatively identified with peritoneal seeding. Multivariate analysis revealed the following factors associated with peritoneal seeding: high American Society of Anesthesiologists score, fibrinogen, Borrmann type 3 or 4 tumors, the involvement of the middle, anterior, and greater curvature, cT3 or cT4cN1 or cN2 or cN3, cM1, and the presence of ascites or peritoneal thickening or plaque or a nodule on the peritoneal wall on computed tomography. The bootstrap analysis revealed a robust concordance between mean and final parameter estimates. The area under the ROC curve for the final model was 0.856 (95% CI, 0.835-0.877), which implies good performance.

CONCLUSIONS

This nomogram provides effective risk estimates of peritoneal seeding from gastric cancer and can facilitate individualized decision-making regarding the selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy.

Development of the Peritoneal Metastasis: A Review of Back-Grounds, Mechanisms, Treatments and Prospects

Peritoneal metastasis is a malignant disease which originated from several gastrointestinal and gynecological carcinomas and has been leading to a suffering condition in patients for decades. Currently, as people have gradually become more aware of the severity of peritoneal carcinomatosis, new molecular mechanisms for targeting and new treatments have been proposed. However, due to the uncertainty of influencing factors involved and a lack of a standardized procedure for this treatment, as well as a need for more clinical data for specific evaluation, more research is needed, both for preventing and treating. We aim to summarize backgrounds, mechanisms and treatments in this area and conclude limitations or new aspects for treatments.

Superiority of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT to [18F]FDG PET/CT in delineating the primary tumor and peritoneal metastasis in initial gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT with [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of initial gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT with [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in patients with initial gastric cancer from September 2020 to March 2021. Lesion detectability and the uptake of lesions quantified by the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were compared between the two modalities using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and McNemar's chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients (37 males, aged 23-81 years) were included, of which 22 underwent radical gastrectomy. For primary lesions, higher uptake of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 was observed compared to [¹⁸F]FDG (median SUVmax, 14.60 vs 4.35, p < 0.001), resulting in higher positive detection using [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (95.1% vs 73.8%, p < 0.001), particularly for tumors with signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) (96.4% vs 57.1%, p < 0.001). [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT detected more positive lymph nodes than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (637 vs 407). However, both modalities underestimated N staging compared to pathological N staging. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT showed a higher sensitivity (92.3% vs 53.8%, p = 0.002) and peritoneal cancer index score (18 vs 3, p < 0.001) in peritoneum metastasis and other suspect metastases compared to [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT outperformed [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary tumors with SRCC and peritoneum metastasis in initial gastric cancer. However, no clinically useful improvement was seen in N staging.

KEY POINTS

• The uptake of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 in primary tumor and metastasis was intensely higher than that of [¹⁸F]FDG (p < 0.001) in 61 patients with initial gastric cancer. • [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT had a higher sensitivity detection in primary tumors (95.1% vs 73.8%, p < 0.001) and peritoneal metastases (92.3% vs 53.8%, p = 0.002) than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT. • [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[¹⁸F]FAPI-42 PET/CT depicted more positive lymph nodes than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (637 vs 407); however, both underestimated N staging compared to pathological N staging.

Value of Clinical Information on Radiology Reports in Oncological Imaging

Radiological reporting errors have a direct negative impact on patient treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of clinical information (CI) in radiological reporting of oncological imaging and the dependence on the radiologists’ experience level (EL). Sixty-four patients with several types of carcinomas and twenty patients without tumors were enrolled. Computed tomography datasets acquired in primary or follow-up staging were independently analyzed by three radiologists (R) with different EL (R1: 15 years; R2: 10 years, R3: 1 year). Reading was initially performed without and 3 months later with CI. Overall, diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for primary tumor detection increased significantly when receiving CI from 77% to 87%; p = 0.01 and 73% to 83%; p = 0.01, respectively. All radiologists benefitted from CI; R1: 85% vs. 92%, p = 0.15; R2: 77% vs. 83%, p = 0.33; R3: 70% vs. 86%, p = 0.02. Overall, diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for detecting lymphogenous metastases increased from 80% to 85% (p = 0.13) and 42% to 56% (p = 0.13), for detection of hematogenous metastases from 85% to 86% (p = 0.61) and 46% to 60% (p = 0.15). Specificity remained stable (>90%). Thus, CI in oncological imaging seems to be essential for correct radiological reporting, especially for residents, and should be available for the radiologist whenever possible.

FAPI PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Abdominal and Pelvic Tumors

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) is currently a standard imaging examination used in clinical practice, and plays an essential role in preoperative systemic evaluation and tumor staging in patients with tumors. However, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has certain limitations in imaging of some tumors, like gastric mucus adenocarcinoma, highly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and peritoneal metastasis. Therefore, to search for new tumor diagnosis methods has always been an important topic in radiographic imaging research. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is highly expressed in many epithelial carcinomas, and various isotope-labelled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) show lower uptake in the brain and abdominal tissues than in tumor, thus achieving high image contrast and good tumor delineation. In addition to primary tumors, FAPI PET/CT is better than FDG PET/CT for detecting lymph nodes and metastases. Additionally, the highly selective tumor uptake of FAPI may open up new application areas for the non-invasive characterization, staging of tumors, as well as monitoring tumor treatment efficacy. This review focuses on the recent research progress of FAPI PET/CT in the application to abdominal and pelvic tumors, with the aim of providing new insights for diagnostic strategies for tumor patients, especially those with metastases.

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivities of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the primary tumor, and nodal, peritoneal and distant organ metastases of primary and recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma (GAc) with patient and lesion-based comparison.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Twenty-one patients with histopathologically proven newly diagnosed or recurrent GAc who underwent 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-04 imaging were included in the study. Both imaging techniques were evaluated visually according to the intensity of organ-based uptake. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) values obtained from primary tumor/relapse and metastatic organs were compared statistically.

RESULTS

68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake was positive in all 15 newly diagnosed patients, while two patients among them who had mucinous and signet ring cell carcinoma did not exhibit 18F-FDG uptake. The sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in detecting primary gastric were 100%, while the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG were 86.6 and 100%, respectively. 68Ga-FAPI-04 imaging revealed diffuse stomach uptake in seven patients, while 18F-FDG could only show two of them. The sensitivity and specificity of in-patient-based detection of lymph node metastases were 100 and 95.2%, respectively, while these values were 71.4 and 93.7%, respectively, for 18F-FDG. For peritoneal involvement 68Ga-FAPI-04 had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, whereas 18F-FDG had a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSION

68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is an imaging modality with the potential of yielding more sensitive and specific findings 18F-FDG PET/CT. This modality may help avoid invasive diagnostic procedures that may be frequently required in GAc.

Imaging of Gastric Carcinomatosis

Diagnosing the absence or presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with gastric cancer, including its extent and distribution, is an essential step in patients' therapeutic management. Such diagnosis still remains a radiological challenge. In this article, we review the strengths and weaknesses of the different imaging techniques for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin as well as the techniques' imaging features. We also discuss the assessment of response to treatment and present recommendations for the follow-up of patients with complete surgical resection according to the presence of risk factors of recurrence, as well as discussing future directions for imaging improvement.

18F-Fludeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Laparoscopy for Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Dutch Cohort Study (PLASTIC)

Importance

The optimal staging for gastric cancer remains a matter of debate.

Objective

To evaluate the value of 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and staging laparoscopy (SL) in addition to initial staging by means of gastroscopy and CT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter prospective, observational cohort study included 394 patients with locally advanced, clinically curable gastric adenocarcinoma (≥cT3 and/or N+, M0 category based on CT) between August 1, 2017, and February 1, 2020.

Exposures

All patients underwent an FDG-PET/CT and/or SL in addition to initial staging.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the number of patients in whom the intent of treatment changed based on the results of these 2 investigations. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic performance, number of incidental findings on FDG-PET/CT, morbidity and mortality after SL, and diagnostic delay.

Results

Of the 394 patients included, 256 (65%) were men and mean (SD) age was 67.6 (10.7) years. A total of 382 patients underwent FDG-PET/CT and 357 underwent SL. Treatment intent changed from curative to palliative in 65 patients (16%) based on the additional FDG-PET/CT and SL findings. FDG-PET/CT detected distant metastases in 12 patients (3%), and SL detected peritoneal or locally nonresectable disease in 73 patients (19%), with an overlap of 7 patients (2%). FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 33% (95% CI, 17%-53%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%) in detecting distant metastases. Secondary findings on FDG/PET were found in 83 of 382 patients (22%), which led to additional examinations in 65 of 394 patients (16%). Staging laparoscopy resulted in a complication requiring reintervention in 3 patients (0.8%) without postoperative mortality. The mean (SD) diagnostic delay was 19 (14) days.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study's findings suggest an apparently limited additional value of FDG-PET/CT; however, SL added considerably to the staging process of locally advanced gastric cancer by detection of peritoneal and nonresectable disease. Therefore, it may be useful to include SL in guidelines for staging advanced gastric cancer, but not FDG-PET/CT.

Performance of Dual-tracer PET-CT for Staging Post-Liver Transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence

Precise staging is essential in the management of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation. There is no current consensus on the optimal staging strategy. We conducted this study to evaluate the performance of dual-tracer positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for this purpose and to investigate whether the results of dual-tracer PET-CT affected patient management.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted. Patients who underwent dual-tracer PET-CT for suspected or confirmed HCC recurrence after liver transplant were included. The lesion-based sensitivity and positive predictive value of dual-tracer PET-CT were determined.

Results

Fifty-six patients and 189 recurrent tumors were included. The lesion-based sensitivity and positive predictive value of dual-tracer PET-CT were 94.7% and 90.4%, respectively. The sensitivity of dual-tracer PET-CT was better than the standard imaging in the surveillance protocol (82.5% versus 94.7%, P < 0.001), especially for detecting liver recurrence (71.0% versus 96.8%, P < 0.001). Half of the dual-tracer PET-CT detected additional recurrence (n = 26, 46.4%) and one-third led to a change in management (n = 19, 33.9%). Ten patients (17.9%) with inconclusive standard imaging had metabolic recurrence confirmed on PET-CT and treatment was commenced early. Four patients (7.1%) had revised locoregional treatment, and 5 (8.9%) had to withdraw from locoregional treatment after the detection of additional metastatic disease.

Conclusions

Dual-tracer PET-CT is effective for staging posttransplant HCC recurrence. It often provides valuable information to guide clinical management.

Comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG for the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with gastric cancer: a bicentric retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

The low sensitivity of [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]-FDG) for the diagnosis of gastric cancer limits its application. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential advantage of [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 over [¹⁸F]-FDG in the evaluation of gastric cancer.

METHODS

This was a bicentric retrospective analysis of a prospective parent study (clinical trial: HS-KY-2020-826 (Huashan Hospital) and DF-2020-102 (Shanghai East Hospital)). Thirty-eight patients with gastric cancer (31 with adenocarcinoma and 7 with signet ring cell carcinoma) were included in this study. All of the participants underwent [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [¹⁸F]-FDG imaging by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) or PET/magnetic resonance (MR). The scans were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) was calculated. Histopathological findings obtained from biopsy or resected surgical specimens were used as a reference for the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

For the detection of primary gastric cancer, the sensitivities of [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [¹⁸F]-FDG PET were 100% (38/38) and 82% (31/38), respectively (P = 0.016). Four cases of adenocarcinoma and three cases of signet ring cell carcinoma were missed by [¹⁸F]-FDG PET. The mean SUV_max of [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 in tumours greater than 4 cm (11.0 ± 4.5) was higher than that in tumours less than 4 cm (4.5 ± 3.2) (P = 0.0015). The mean SUV_max of [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was higher in T2-4 tumours (9.7 ± 4.4) than in T1 tumours (3.1 ± 1.5) (P = 0.0002). For the detection of metastatic lesions, the sensitivities of [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET and [¹⁸F]-FDG PET in 10 patients with regional lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were 6/10 and 5/10, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this selected cohort, [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET had a superior detection rate than [¹⁸F]-FDG PET for primary gastric cancer. [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET could provide better performance with regard to gastric cancer diagnosis and staging. Prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging and recurrence detection in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore the clinical utility of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ([⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) relative to [¹⁸F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) PET/CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for primary staging and recurrence detection in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis utilized a sub-cohort of patients from a previously acquired database. Patients with NPC who underwent [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT between October 2019 and November 2020 were included. The radiotracer uptake and clinical staging/restaging performances of [¹⁸F]FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-five participants (39 for initial assessment, 6 for recurrence detection) were included. In treatment-naïve participants, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT showed higher radiotracer uptake than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in primary tumors (16.18 vs. 10.11, P < 0.001), regional lymph nodes (11.42 vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and bone and visceral metastases (6.94 vs. 3.11, P < 0.001). Compared with the [¹⁸F]FDG-based TNM stage, the [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-based TNM stage was upgraded in ten patients (26%), resulting in management changes in seven patients (18%). Compared with MRI, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT upgraded and underestimated the T stage in four and two patients, respectively. In post-treatment patients, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT yielded more true-positive findings than [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in detecting local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT is a promising imaging modality for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic NPC. The exact tumor geographic imaging obtained through [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT may be a supplement to MRI for T staging and radiotherapy planning.

Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used for staging and diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer. Recently, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET)/CT gained popularity as a diagnostic tool owing to advantages including dual functional and anatomical imaging, which may facilitate early diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT has been assessed in several studies but with variable results. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary TNM staging and the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancers. A systematic search of the PubMed Central, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception until January 2020 was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study-2 tool was used to determine the quality of the selected studies. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A total of 58 studies comprising 9,997 patients were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias. The sensitivity and specificity for nodal staging of gastric cancer were 49% (95% CI, 37-61%) and 92% (95% CI, 86-96%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 67% (95% CI, 57-76%) and 86% (95% CI, 81-89%) for CECT, respectively. For metastasis staging, the sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95% CI, 40-71%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. For diagnosing cancer recurrence, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI, 72-88%) and 83% (95% CI, 74-89%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. Both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT were deemed highly useful for diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer due to their high sensitivities and specificities. However, these techniques cannot be used to exclude or confirm the presence of lymph node metastases or recurrent gastric cancer tumors, but can be used for the confirmation of distal metastasis.

Role of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of peritoneal carcinomatosis and comparison with [18F]-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the role of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), compared with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT, for evaluating peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with various types of cancer.

METHODS

Patients with suspected peritoneal malignancy, who underwent both [¹⁸F]-FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT between October 2019 and August 2020, were retrospectively analysed. The radiotracer uptake, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, and diagnostic performance of [¹⁸F]-FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 46 patients, including 16 patients with diffuse-type peritoneal carcinomatosis, 27 with nodular-type peritoneal carcinomatosis, and 3 true-negative patients. A significant difference in standard uptake values (SUV) of lesions between [¹⁸F]-FDG and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT examination was observed (median SUV: 3.48 vs. 9.82; P < 0.001), particularly in peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer (median SUV: 3.44 vs. 8.05; P = 0.001). Moreover, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed a higher PCI score and better sensitivity than [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis (6 vs. 18; P < 0.001; 72.09% vs. 97.67%; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated superior sensitivity over [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT for the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with various types of cancer, particularly gastric cancer. Furthermore, the uptake of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in peritoneal carcinomatosis was significantly higher than that of [¹⁸F]-FDG, demonstrating a larger extent of the lesions and yielding a higher PCI score. This could help enhance the image contrast, improve physicians' diagnostic confidence, and reduce the proportion of missed diagnoses.

Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG Uptake in Gastric, Duodenal, and Colorectal Cancers

Background Accurate clinical staging is crucial to managing gastrointestinal cancer, but fluorine 18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT has limitations. Targeting fibroblast-activation protein is a newer diagnostic approach for the visualization of tumor stroma, and gallium 68 (⁶⁸Ga)-labeled fibroblast-activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs), hereafter ⁶⁸Ga-FAPIs, present a promising alternative to ¹⁸F-FDG. Purpose To compare the diagnostic efficacy of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT in primary and metastatic lesions of gastrointestinal malignancies with that of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Materials and Methods Images from patients with gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers who underwent contemporaneous ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT between October 2019 through June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI uptakes were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The McNemar test was used to compare the diagnostic performance between the two techniques. Results Thirty-five patients (median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 53-68 years]; 18 men) were evaluated. In treatment-naive patients (n = 19), ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT led to upstaging of the clinical TNM stage in four (21%) patients compared with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Tracer uptake was higher with ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT than with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in primary lesions (gastric cancer: 12.7 vs 3.7, respectively, P = .003; colorectal cancer: 15.9 vs 7.9, P = .03), involved lymph nodes (6.7 vs 2.4, P < .001), and bone and visceral metastases (liver metastases: 9.7 vs 5.2, P < .001; peritoneal metastases: 8.4 vs 3.6, P < .001; bone metastases: 4.3 vs 2.2, P < .001; lung metastases: 4.4 vs 1.9, P = .01). In addition, the sensitivity of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT was higher than that of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary tumors (100% [19 of 19] vs 53% [10 of 19], respectively; P = .004), lymph nodes (79% [22 of 28] vs 54% [15 of 28], P < .001), and bone and visceral metastases (89% [31 of 35] vs 57% [20 of 35], P < .001). Conclusion Gallium 68 fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor PET/CT was superior to fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the detection of primary and metastatic lesions in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers, with higher tracer uptake in most primary and metastatic lesions. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

Development and validation of a deep learning system for ascites cytopathology interpretation

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is clinically significant regarding optimal treatment selection and avoidance of unnecessary surgical procedures. Cytopathology plays an important role in early screening of PM. We aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) system to achieve intelligent cytopathology interpretation, especially in ascites cytopathology.

METHODS

The original ascites cytopathology image dataset consists of 139 patients' original hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Papanicolaou (PAP) Staining images. DL system was developed using transfer learning (TL) to achieve cell detection and classification. Pre-trained alexnet, vgg16, goolenet, resnet18 and resnet50 models were studied. Cell detection dataset consists of 176 cropped images with 6573 annotated cell bounding boxes. Cell classification data set consists of 487 cropped images with 18,558 and 6089 annotated malignant and benign cells in total, respectively.

RESULTS

We established a novel ascites cytopathology image dataset and achieved automatically cell detection and classification. DetectionNet based on Faster R-CNN using pre-trained resnet18 achieved cell detection with 87.22% of cells' Intersection of Union (IoU) bigger than the threshold of 0.5. The mean average precision (mAP) was 0.8316. The ClassificationNet based on resnet50 achieved the greatest performance in cell classification with AUC = 0.8851, Precision = 96.80%, FNR = 4.73%. The DL system integrating the separately trained DetectionNet and Classificationnet showed great performance in the cytopathology image interpretation.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that the integration of DL can improve the efficiency of healthcare. The DL system we developed using TL techniques achieved accurate cytopathology interpretation, and had great potential to be integrated into clinician workflow.

A nomogram based on glycomic biomarkers in serum and clinicopathological characteristics for evaluating the risk of peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer

Background

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) in gastric cancer (GC) remains an untreatable disease, and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. Here, we aim to establish a novel prediction model.

Methods

The clinicopathologic characteristics of a cohort that included 86 non-metastatic GC patients and 43 PMGC patients from Zhongshan Hospital were retrospectively analysed to identify PM associated variables. Additionally, mass spectrometry and glycomic analysis were applied in the same cohort to find glycomic biomarkers in serum for the diagnosis of PM. A nomogram was established based on the associations between potential risk variables and PM.

Results

Overexpression of 4 N-glycans (H6N5L1E1: m/z 2620.93; H5N5F1E2: m/z 2650.98; H6N5E2, m/z 2666.96; H6N5L1E2, m/z 2940.08); weight loss ≥ 5 kg; tumour size ≥ 3 cm; signet ring cell or mucinous adenocarcinoma histology type; poor differentiation; diffuse or mixed Lauren classification; increased CA19-9, CA125, and CA724 levels; decreased lymphocyte count, haemoglobin, albumin, and pre-albumin levels were identified to be associated with PM. A nomogram that integrated with five independent risk factors (weight loss ≥ 5 kg, CA19-9 ≥ 37 U/mL, CA125 ≥ 35 U/mL, lymphocyte count < 2.0 * 10 ~ 9/L, and H5N5F1E2 expression ≥ 0.0017) achieved a good performance for diagnosis (AUC: 0.892, 95% CI 0.829–0.954). When 160 was set as the cut-off threshold value, the proposed nomogram represented a perfectly discriminating power for both sensitivity (0.97) and specificity (0.88).

Conclusions

The nomogram achieved an individualized assessment of the risk of PM in GC patients; thus, the nomogram could be used to assist clinical decision-making before surgery.

Practical guidance for the evaluation of disease progression and the decision to change treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy

After failure of first-line chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines and platinum compounds for advanced gastric cancer, second-line chemotherapy with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, which elicits a durable response, and third-line or later chemotherapy with nivolumab have been shown to lead to a more favorable prognosis in advanced gastric cancer patients. As new and more effective drugs are now available, sequential chemotherapy would contribute to prolonged survival. From this point of view, the patient's disease course should be frequently monitored in order to adapt treatment regimens. This review summarizes the points to note in regard to radiological assessment, and discusses the integration of prognostic factors, tumor markers, and clinical symptoms that need to be taken into account to change treatment at an appropriate timing.

Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional imaging techniques in the clinical management of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

A prospective study between January 2010 and December 2011 in patients with suspected LAGC was conducted in our hospital. F-FDG PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), endoscopic ultrasound, and laparoscopy were performed in all cases. Standard whole-body F-FDG PET/CT images were obtained centered on the stomach at 1 and 2 hours after injection of 4.0 MBq/kg of F-FDG. Findings were confirmed by histopathology or by imaging follow-up in nonoperable patients.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients with confirmed LAGC (20 women, 30 men) with a mean ± SD age of 65.7 ± 12.1 years were included. Using Lauren classification, 24 patients were intestinal subtype, and 26 were diffuse subtype. Thirty-five patients with locoregional lymph node involvement and 22 with distant metastases were confirmed as peritoneal metastases (n = 15), retroperitoneal (n = 2) or mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 1), and liver (n = 3) or bone metastases (n = 1). Patients with signet ring carcinoma showed significantly less F-FDG uptake (P = 0.001). SUVmax correlated with tumor grading (P < 0.05). Standard and delayed F-FDG PET/CT and CECT images identified LAGC in 24, 27, and 28 of 30 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for F-FDG PET/CT and CECT to detect metastases were 68% and 100% and 64% and 93%, respectively. Contrast-enhanced CT and F-FDG PET/CT diagnosed only 6 of the 15 patients with confirmed peritoneal metastases. The impact in therapeutic management of F-FDG PET/CT and CECT was 24% and 22%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the LGAC showed a significant correlation between SUVmax and overall survival using an SUVmax threshold of less than 3.96 (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

F-FDG PET/CT should be recommended for staging of LAGC; however, F-FDG PET/CT and CECT cannot replace laparoscopy to rule out peritoneal metastases. Delayed F-FDG PET/CT images show an increase of F-FDG uptake in most cases, improving LAGC detection. The grade of F-FDG uptake represents a significant prognostic tool in this series.

Imaging peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer with 18F-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a proof-of-concept study

OBJECTIVE

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most frequent form of metastasis in gastric cancer (GC). The sensitivity of detecting PM by pre-operative imaging modalities is low. Utility of positron emission tomography (PET) with ¹⁸F-fluodeoxyglucose (FDG) for GC is limited, because diffuse-type tumors are not FDG-avid. ¹⁸F-fluothymidine ([F-18]FLT) is a radiotracer that reflects cellular proliferation and the utility of [F-18]FLT-PET in GC has been reported. In this proof-of-concept study, we explored the ability of [F-18]FLT-PET/CT to detect PM of GC previously identified by other imaging modalities.

METHODS

The key eligibility criteria were as follows; (i) histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma; (ii) evident PM detected by CT performed within 4 weeks prior to registration; (iii) no prior treatment of PM within 4 weeks before registration. [F-18]FLT-PET/CT was performed at National Cancer Center Hospital, and [F-18]FLT-PET/CT images were evaluated independently by two radiologists. Safety assessments were carried out before and after [F-18]FLT-PET/CT. The primary end point was the detection sensitivity of PM.

RESULTS

A total of 19 eligible patients were analyzed, of which 15 (78.9%) had diffuse-type histology. Detection sensitivity of PM, primary lesion, and lymph node metastasis were 73.7% [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax): 1.697-13.21], 100% (SUVmax: 2.71-22.01), and 72.7% (SUVmax: 2.079-12.61), respectively. No patients experienced adverse events during or after [F-18]FLT-PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

This proof-of-concept study shows that [F-18]FLT-PET/CT is a sensitive method for detecting PM in GC, and paves the way for future studies investigating the clinical utility of this approach for the detection of clinically non-evident PM in GC. Advances in knowledge: This proof-of-concept study found that [F-18]FLT-PET/CT is a sensitive method for detecting peritoneal metastases in GC.

A case of advanced gastric cancer achieved a pathological complete response by chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although chemotherapy is the first recommended treatment of unresectable gastric cancer, a pathological complete response is a rare event.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 58-year-old male was diagnosed as gastric cancer with a bulky tumor, lymphadenopathy, and suspicious peritoneal dissemination. The patient underwent chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin. After three courses of chemotherapy, a computed tomography showed dramatic improvements in gastric wall thickening, shrinkage of lymphadenopathy, and disappearance of disseminated peritoneal lesion. The patient underwent potentially curative resection by total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Histological examination revealed the absence of malignant cells not only in the resected specimen but also in the harvested lymph nodes. At present, more than 7 years after the initial surgery, the patient is still alive without any recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We obtained a pathological complete response by chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer. Although a pathological complete response is a rare event, it would be associated with the long-term survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Computed tomographic characteristics for patients with unresectable gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis

Although current staging workups could differentiate most patients with operable from inoperable advanced gastric cancers, there are still some patients with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis, defined as only metastasis with multiple subcentimeter lesions in peritoneum, receiving unnecessary open-close procedures. The computed tomography (CT) of the patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer harboring low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis was retrospectively identified and then thoroughly reviewed by two independent radiologists unaware of the peritoneal carcinomatosis status. Of the 798 patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer between January 2007 and December 2010, 52 patients harboring advanced gastric cancer with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis receiving surgery with curative intent were identified. Descriptive statistic was used for the radiologic characteristics. The most common radiologic characteristic of CT was omental fat stranding (57.7%), followed by omental clustered subcentimeter nodules (53.8%), distant enlarged lymph node (40.4%), distant grouping of small lymph nodes (36.5%), peritoneal nodules or thickening (34.6%), minimal loculated ascites (21.2%), intestinal wall thickening or irregularity (9.6%), and hydronephrosis or hydroureter without stone or urothelial lesion (5.8%). Comprehensively reviewing the radiologic characteristics of CT may identify the patients harboring advanced gastric cancer with low-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis.

FLT-PET/CT diagnosis of primary and metastatic nodal lesions of gastric cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT

PURPOSE

To examine the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET/CT of primary and metastatic nodal lesions of gastric cancer by comparing with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT.

METHODS

The enrolled study population comprised 17 patients with 17 newly diagnosed gastric cancers who underwent surgery of the primary lesion and regional nodes after both FDG- and FLT-PET/CT scans. Visual detectability of the primary gastric lesions was correlated with pathological factors using the Fisher exact or Mann-Whitney U test. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting nodal lesions were compared between both PET/CT scans using the McNemar exact or χ (2) test.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 17 (82.4%) primary cancers were visualized by both FDG- and FLT-PET/CT scans. Although FDG or FLT visibility was not significantly associated with tumor size (p = 0.16) or histological type (p = 1.00), the 3 nonvisible lesions were pathologically early (T1) cancers. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting nodal metastasis were 44.8% (13/29), 98.7% (164/166), and 90.8% (177/195) for FDG-PET/CT, and 31.0% (9/29), 100% (166/166), and 89.7% (175/195) for FLT-PET/CT, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two scans in sensitivity (p = 0.13), specificity (p = 0.48), or accuracy (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

FLT-PET/CT may have the same diagnostic value as FDG-PET/CT for detection of primary and nodal lesions of gastric cancer.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer: 2-year follow-up results at a single institution in Korea

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine 2-year follow-up results of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal cancer.

Methods

We performed 54 cases of CRS and IPC in 53 patients with PC of colorectal cancer from December 2011 to December 2013. We collected data prospectively and analyzed the grade of PC, morbidity and mortality, and short-term follow-up (median, 10 months; range, 2–47 months) results.

Results

Mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 15 (range, 1–35), and complete cytoreduction was possible in 35 patients (64.8%). Complications occurred in 25 patients (46.3%) and mortality occurred in 4 patients (7.4%). Excluding the 4 mortalities, 17 patients out of 49 patients (31.5%) were alive at the time of the last follow-up and the overall median survival was 10.3 months. Patients with complete cytoreduction had a median survival of 22.6 months, which was significantly longer than the median survival of 3.5 months for patients without complete cytoreduction (P < 0.001). PCI grade, CCR grade, cell type, and postoperative chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors by univariate analysis. Positive independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis included PCI grade and postoperative chemotherapy.

Conclusion

CRS and IPC increased the survival of patients with low PCI and postoperative systemic chemotherapy was mandatory. However, this combined therapeutic approach showed high rate of complications and mortality. Therefore, this aggressive treatment should be performed in only selected patients by considering the general condition of the patient and the extent of PC.

Negative predictive value of preoperative computed tomography in determining pathologic local invasion, nodal disease, and abdominal metastases in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Before undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric adenocarcinoma (ga), most patients undergo abdominal computed tomography (ct) imaging to determine contraindications to resection (local invasion, distant metastases). However, the ability to detect contraindications is variable, and the literature is limited to single-institution studies. We sought to assess, on a population level, the clinical relevance of preoperative ct in evaluating the resectability of ga tumours in patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

In a provincial cancer registry, 2414 patients with ga diagnosed during 2005-2008 at 116 institutions were identified, and a primary chart review of radiology, operative, and pathology reports was performed for all patients. Preoperative abdominal ct reports were compared with intraoperative findings and final pathology reports (reference standard) to determine the negative predictive value (npv) of ct in assessing local invasion, nodal involvement, and intra-abdominal metastases.

RESULTS

Among patients undergoing gastrectomy, the npv of ct imaging in detecting local invasion was 86.9% (n = 536). For nodal metastasis, the npv of ct was 43.3% (n = 450). Among patients undergoing surgical exploration, the npv of ct for intra-abdominal metastases was 52.3% (n = 407).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative abdominal ct imaging reported as negative is most accurate in determining local invasion and least accurate in nodal assessment. The poor npv of ct should be taken into account when selecting patients for staging laparoscopy.

Accuracy of staging laparoscopy in detecting peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

Despite staging laparoscopy (SL) with peritoneal lavage is recommended in US Guidelines in patients with potentially resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, this procedure is not systematically proposed in French Guidelines. Therefore, we decided to analyze the results of systematic SL in patients considered for preoperative chemotherapy. From 2005 to 2011, 116 consecutive patients with distal esophagus, esogastric junction, and gastric adenocarcinoma ≥T3 or N+ without detectable metastatic dissemination by computed tomography (CT) scan imaging underwent SL before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Positive and negative SLs were compared according to tumor characteristics. SL was positive in 15 cases (12.9%) including 14 with peritoneal seeding (localized in five, diffuse in nine). SL was positive in 7 (24.1%) of 29 patients with poorly differentiated tumor, in 9 (32.1%) of 28 patients with signet ring cells, in 7 (50%) of 14 patients with gastric linitis tumor, and in 15 (16.3%) of 92 patients with T3 or T4 tumor. All the lesions of distal esophagus extending to the cardia had a negative SL. Among the 14 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis at SL, nine (65%) had signs of peritoneal seeding on initial CT scan. One (0.8%) patient had a small bowel perforation closed laparoscopically. If systematic SL before preoperative chemotherapy does not seem justified because of its low accuracy, it should be performed in patients with poorly differentiated tumor, signet ring cell, and gastric linitis plastica components on biopsy and when CT scan is suggestive of T4 tumor, ascites, or peritoneal nodule.

Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the added clinical value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT (CECT) alone for staging of advanced gastric cancer

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 106 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent pretreatment CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Two experienced reviewers assessed the diagnostic performance of both CECT alone and the combination of CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the primary tumor, regional lymph node metastasis (N) and distant metastasis (M), rating their diagnostic confidence with a 5-point scoring system for each location. The two methods were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for histopathologic findings, imaging, and clinical follow-up as the reference standards.

RESULTS

Among the 106 patients, 96 primary tumors (90.6%) were detected by CECT, while 101 (95.3%) were clearly identified by (18)F-FDG PET/CT (p=0.074). Patient-based areas under the ROC curves for CECT alone versus the combination of CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of N stage, peritoneal dissemination, liver metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, metastasis at other sites and overall M stage were 0.787 vs. 0.858 (p=0.13), 0.866 vs. 0.878 (p=0.31), 0.998 vs. 1.0 (p=0.36), 0.744 vs. 0.865 (p=0.049), 0.786 vs. 0.998 (p=0.034), 0.944 vs. 0.984 (p=0.34), and 0.889 vs. 0.912 (p=0.21), respectively. The diagnostic performance of primary tumor detection and NM staging was not influenced by the histologic subtype.

CONCLUSION

Adding (18)F-FDG PET/CT to CECT provides better diagnostic accuracy for detection of distant lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer.

Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT for surveillance in asymptomatic gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection

PURPOSE

The present study evaluated the diagnostic performance of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for surveillance in asymptomatic gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 190 gastric cancer patients (115 early gastric cancer patients and 75 advanced gastric cancer patients) who underwent 1-year (91 patients) or 2-year (99 patients) postoperative FDG PET/CT surveillance, along with a routine follow-up program, after curative surgical resection. All enrolled patients were asymptomatic and showed no recurrence on follow-up examinations performed before PET/CT surveillance. All PET/CT images were visually assessed and all abnormal findings on follow-up examinations including FDG PET/CT were confirmed with histopathological diagnosis or clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 19 patients (10.0 %) developed recurrence. FDG PET/CT showed abnormal findings in 37 patients (19.5 %). Among them, 16 patients (8.4 %) were diagnosed as cancer recurrence. Of 153 patients without abnormal findings on PET/CT, three patients were false-negative and diagnosed as recurrence on other follow-up examinations. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG PET/CT were 84.2 %, 87.7 %, 43.2 %, and 98.0 %, respectively. Among 115 early gastric cancer patients, PET/CT detected recurrence in four patients (3.5 %) and one patient with local recurrence. Among 75 advanced gastric cancer patients, PET/CT detected recurrence in 12 patients (16.0 %), excluding two patients experiencing peritoneal recurrence. In addition, FDG PET/CT detected secondary primary cancer in six (3.2 %) out of all the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative FDG PET/CT surveillance showed good diagnostic ability for detecting recurrence in gastric cancer patients. FDG PET/CT could be a useful follow-up modality for gastric cancer patients, especially those with advanced gastric cancer. However, further careful evaluation is needed because of false-positive findings on PET/CT.

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Primary Staging of Gastric Cancer

Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the primary staging of gastric cancer in the comparison of ceCT as routine staging method and evaluate influencing parameters of 18F-FDG uptake.

Methods: Thirty-one patients (mean age: 58.9±12.6) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary staging of gastric cancer between June 2011 and June 2012 were included to the study. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were compared with pathological reports in patients who underwent surgery following PET/CT. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of primary lesions, lymph nodes and adjacent organs were compared with ceCT findings and pathological reports. Since 6 patients were accepted as inoperable according to 18F-FDG PET/CT and/or ceCT and/or laparotomy and/or laparoscopy findings, pathological confirmation could not be possible.

Results: In the postoperative TNM staging of patients, while 1 (4%), 1 (4%), 4 (16%), 2 (8%), 12 (48%) and 5 (20%) patients were staged as T0, Tis, T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively, 8 (32%), 6 (24%), 6 (24%) and 5 (20%) patients were N0, N1, N2 and N3 respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT was totally normal in 2 patients. While primary tumors were FDG avid in 27 patients, in 17 and 6 patients FDG uptake was observed in perigastric lymph nodes and distant organs, respectively. Mean SUVmax of FDG avid tumors was calculated as 13.49±9.29 (3.00-44.60). However, SUVmax of lymph nodes was computed as 9.28±6.92 (2.80-29.10). According to sub-analysis of histopathological subtypes of primary tumors, SUVmax of adenocarsinomas was calculated as 15.16 (3.00-44.60), of signet ring cells as 9.90 (5.50-17.70), of adenocarcinomas with signet ring cell component as 11.27 (6.20-13.90) (p=0.721). In the comparison with histopathological examination while ceCT was TP, TN, FN in 23, 1 and 1 patients, 18F-FDG PET/CT was TP, FP, FN in 20, 1 and 4 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPD and NPV of ceCT in the detection of lymph node metastasis was calculated as 83.3%, 75%, 80%, 87.5% and 66.6%, respectively. These parameters for 18F-FDG PET/CT were 64.7%, 100%, 76%, 100% and 57.1%.

Conclusion: Despite lower sensitivity than ceCT, diagnostic power of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer is acceptable. Because of its high PPV, it might be beneficial in the evaluation of patients with suspected lymph nodes. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT seems to be limited in the early stage and signet ring cell carcinomas due to lower 18F-FDG uptake.

The Multidisciplinary Team Conference's Decision on M-Staging in Patients with Gastric- and Gastroesophageal Cancer is not Accurate without Staging Laparoscopy

BACKGROUND

The implementation of the multidisciplinary team conference has been shown to improve treatment outcome for patients with gastric- and gastroesophageal cancer. Likewise, the staging laparoscopy has increased the detection of patients with disseminated disease, that is, patients who do not benefit from a surgical resection. The aim of this study was to compare the multidisciplinary team conference's decision in respect of M-staging with the findings of the following staging laparoscopy.

METHODS

Patients considered operable and resectable within the multidisciplinary team conference in the period 2010-2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient data were retrieved by searching for specific diagnosis and operation codes in the in-house system. The inclusion criteria were as follows: biopsy-verified cancer of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction or stomach, and no suspicion of peritoneal carcinomatosis or liver metastases on multidisciplinary team conference before staging laparoscopy. Furthermore, an evaluation with staging laparoscopy was required.

RESULTS

In total, 222 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most cancers were located in the gastroesophageal junction, n = 171 (77.0%), and most common with adenocarcinoma histology, n = 196 (88.3%). The staging laparoscopy was M1-positive for peritoneal carcinomatosis in eight patients (16.7%) with gastric cancer versus nine patients (5.3%) with gastroesophageal junction cancer. Furthermore, liver metastases were evident in zero patients (0.0%) and four patients (2.3%) with gastric- and gastroesophageal junction cancer, respectively. The staging laparoscopy findings regarding peritoneal carcinomatosis were significantly different between gastric- and gastroesophageal junction cancers, p = 0.01. No significant differences were found regarding T-/N-stage or histological tumor characteristics between the positive- and negative-staging laparoscopy group.

CONCLUSION

The M-staging of the multidisciplinary team conference without staging laparoscopy lacks accuracy concerning peritoneal carcinomatosis. Staging laparoscopy remains an essential part of the preoperative detection of disseminated disease in patients with gastric- and gastroesophageal cancer.

Role of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gastrointestinal cancers

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has become a routine imaging modality for many malignancies and its use is currently increasing. In the present review article, we will summarize the evidence for FDG-PET/CT use in digestive cancers (excluding neuroendocrine tumours), and review the existing recommendations. While PET/CT is nowadays considered to be an important tool in the initial workup of oesophageal and anal cancers, new data are emerging regarding its use in assessing therapeutic efficacy, radiotherapy treatment planning, and detection of recurrence in case of isolated tumour marker elevation. Moreover, PET/CT may help decision making by detecting distant metastatic sites especially in potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer and, to a lesser extent, in localized gastric and pancreatic cancers. Finally, incidental focal colonic FDG uptakes require exploration by colonoscopy, as they are often associated with premalignant or malignant lesions.

Appropriateness criteria of FDG PET/CT in oncology

(18)Fluorine-2-fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established functional imaging method widely used in oncology. In this article, we have incorporated the various indications for (18)FDG PET/CT in oncology based on available evidence and current guidelines. Growing body of evidence for use of (18)FDG PET/CT in select tumors is also discussed. This article attempts to give the reader an overview of the appropriateness of using (18)F-FDG PET/CT in various malignancies.

18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography

The purpose of the report was to evaluate the role of fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) in staging gastric cancer comparing it with contrast enhancement computed tomography (CECT).This retrospective study included 45 patients who underwent performed whole body CECT and F-FDG PET/CT before any treatment. We calculated CECT and F-FDG PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for gastric, lymphnode, and distant localizations; furthermore, we compared the 2 techniques by McNemar test. The role of F-FDG PET/CT semiquantitative parameters in relation to histotype, grading, and site of gastric lesions were evaluated by ANOVA test.Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of CECT, and F-FDG PET/CT for gastric lesion were, respectively, 92.11%, 57.14%, 86.66%, 92.11%, 57.14% and 81.58%, 85.71%, 82.22%, 96.88%, 46.15%. No differences were identified between the 2 techniques about sensitivity and specificity. No statistical differences were observed between PET parameters and histotype, grading, and site of gastric lesion. The results of CECT and F-FDG PET/CT about lymphnode involvement were 70.83%, 61.90%, 66.66%, 68%, 65% and 58.33%, 95.24%, 75.55%, 93.33%, 66.67%. The results of CECT and F-FDG PET/CT about distant metastases were 80%, 62.86%, 66.66%, 38.10%, 91.67% and 60%, 88.57%, 82.22%, 60%, 88.57%. FDG PET/CT specificity was significantly higher both for lymphnode and distant metastases.The F-FDG PET/CT is a useful tool for the evaluation of gastric carcinoma to detect primary lesion, lymphnode, and distant metastases using 1 single image whole-body technique. Integration of CECT with F-FDG PET/CT permits a more valid staging in these patients.

A strategy for improving FDG accumulation for early detection of metastasis from primary pancreatic cancer: stimulation of the Warburg effect in AsPC-1 cells

INTRODUCTION

Early detection and/or prediction of metastasis provide more prognostic relevance than local recurrence. Direct spread into the peritoneum is frequently found in pancreatic cancer patients, but positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) is not useful for identifying such metastasis. We investigated a method to enhance FDG accumulation using AsPC-1 human ascites tumor cells.

METHODS

(14)C-FDG accumulation was assessed under the following conditions: 1) characteristics of (14)C-FDG transport were examined using phloridzin, a Na(+)-free buffer, and various hexoses, and 2) accumulation of (14)C-FDG was measured in cells that were pretreated with hexose for various time periods, and activity of 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase (PFK-1) was assayed.

RESULTS

(14)C-FDG transport into AsPC-1 cells was mediated primarily by a Na(+)-independent transport mechanism. Aldohexoses such as d-glucose, D-mannose, and D-galactose inhibited (14)C-FDG transport. Cells pretreated with d-glucose, D-mannose, or D-fructose exhibited augmented (14)C-FDG accumulation. Pretreatment with higher concentrations of D-glucose or D-fructose tended to increase PFK-1 activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Very little information has been published about the association between PFK-1 and FDG accumulation, and we confirmed the impacts of various hexoses on the activity of PFK-1 and FDG accumulation in AsPC-1 cells. Clarifying the relevance of PFK-1 in FDG accumulation will contribute to developing new features of FDG-PET, because PFK-1 is the main regulator of glycolysis.

The role of HIPEC in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: between lights and shadows

Gastric cancer is one of the most dreadful neoplastic diseases and remains the second cause of cancer death worldwide. Patients who develop peritoneal metastasis have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than 6 months. Despite being the cause of 60% of deaths from gastric cancer, peritoneal metastasis can still be considered a local disease and a local multidisciplinary approach can improve the prognosis even in this end-stage disease. At present, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the most widely accepted treatment for peritoneal surface diseases and can be performed in patients with different stages of cancer and with various antitumoral drugs. We performed a systematic review of the current status of HIPEC in the treatment of gastric peritoneal metastasis in an attempt to obtain answers to the questions that still remain: do results differ with these different methods? Does HIPEC exert a significant effect on the intracavitary delivery of drugs? Which patients should be treated and which should not? What can we expect from this approach in terms of survival, morbidity, and mortality? On reviewing the literature, despite the lack of trials comparing the different methods, we found that HIPEC has been shown to be an effective tool whenever a complete or an almost complete resection of the peritoneal implants can be performed. Therefore, it is advisable to refer all at-risk patients to specialized centers to be enrolled in randomized trials to achieve truly reliable results.

Impact of pre-operative positron emission tomography in gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Current pre-operative staging methods for gallbladder cancer (GBC) are suboptimal in detecting metastatic disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) may have a role but data are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with GBC and PET assessed by a hepatobiliary surgeon in clinic between January 2001 and June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonace imaging (MRI) were correlated with PET scans and analysed for evidence of metastatic or locally unresectable disease. Medical records were reviewed to determine if PET scanning was helpful by preventing non-therapeutic surgery or enabling resection in patients initially deemed unresectable.

RESULTS

There were 100 patients including 63 incidental GBC. Thirty-eight patients did not proceed to surgery, 35 were resected and 27 patients were explored but had unresectable disease. PET was positive for metastatic disease in 39 patients (sensitivity 56%, specificity 94%). Five patients definitively benefitted from PET: in 3 patients PET found disease not seen on CT, and 2 patients with suspicious CT findings had negative PET and successful resections. In a further 12 patients PET confirmed equivocal CT findings. Three patients had additional invasive procedures performed owing to PET avidity in other sites. Utility of PET was higher in patients with suspicious nodal disease on CT [odds ratio (OR) 7.1 versus no nodal disease, P = 0.0004], and in patients without a prior cholecystectomy (OR 3.1 versus post-cholecystectomy, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Addition of PET to conventional cross-sectional imaging has a modest impact on management pre-operatively particularly in patients without a prior cholecystectomy and to confirm suspicious nodal disease on CT.

Imaging of Gastric Cancer Metabolism Using 18 F-FDG PET/CT

Aerobic glycolysis has been the most important hypothesis in cancer metabolism. It seems to be related to increased bioenergetic and biosynthetic needs in rapidly proliferating cancer cells. To this end, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a glucose analog, became widely popular for the detection of malignancies combined with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Although the potential roles of FDG PET/CT in primary tumor detection are not fully established, it seems to have a limited sensitivity in detecting early gastric cancer and mainly signet ring or non-solid types of advanced gastric cancer. In evaluating lymph node metastases, the location of lymph nodes and the degree of FDG uptake in primary tumors appear to be important factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT. In spite of the limited sensitivity, the high specificity of PET/CT for lymph node metastases may play an important role in changing the extent of lymphadenectomy or reducing futile laparotomies. For peritoneal metastases, PET/CT seems to have a poorer sensitivity but a better specificity than CT. The roles of PET/CT in the evaluation of other distant metastases are yet to be known. Studies including primary tumors with low FDG uptake or peritoneal recurrence seem suffer from poorer diagnostic performance for the detection of recurrent gastric cancer. There are only a few reports using FDG PET/CT to predict response to neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. A complete metabolic response seems to be predictive of more favorable prognosis.

PET or PET/CT for detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a meta-analysis

The present study assessed the diagnostic performances of (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Through a search of MEDLINE (January 1998 to September 2012), an overall weighted average for sensitivity and specificity was calculated using the weighted averages of the sample sizes in each relevant study. Pooled estimates of positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated using fixed and random effects models, respectively, according to the heterogeneity among studies. A summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) curve was constructed and the area under the sROC curve (AUC) was calculated. To explore heterogeneity, due to sources other than threshold effects, I-square was calculated.

RESULTS

The present study included analyses of patients (n = 513) from 7 studies. Results indicated a significant heterogeneity for sensitivity and specificity (I(2) > 50% and P < 0.05). The overall pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET or PET/CT scans in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis were 72.4% (95% CI, 64.4%-79.5%) and 96.7% (95% CI, 94.4%-98.3%), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 10.414 (95% CI, 6.195-17.506) and the negative likelihood ratio 0.312 (95% CI, 0.159-0.612). The AUC was 0.9404. The overall diagnostic accuracy (Q* index) was 87.8%.

CONCLUSION

The high specificity may provide the reliability of a positive FDG PET or PET/CT to detect peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with cancer. FDG PET or PET/CT has only weak power to exclude the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. By a good overall diagnostic accuracy, FDG PET or PET/CT may prove beneficial to surgeons when selecting appropriate patients on whom to perform laparoscopy or laparotomy.

The role of 2-[f-18] fluoro 2-deoxy d-glucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

FDG-PET can contribute significantly to the preoperative period of patients with planned curative resections or with isolated liver or lung metastasis. In this study, we analyze the importance and diagnostic value of FDG-PET in the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancers by correlating its value with computerized tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted. Abdominal and pelvic CTs were obtained for preoperative staging in each patient. Separate stagings were performed according to the findings of conventional methods and PET scans, and the results were compared with the operative and histological findings.

RESULTS

When the patients were evaluated according to the pathological stage, eight patients were Stage 1 (26.7%), five were Stage 2 (16.7%), eight were Stage 3 (26.7%), and nine were Stage 4 (30%). FDG-PET and CT down-staged the disease in eight (26.7%) and twelve (40%) patients, respectively. FDG-PET and CT up-staged the disease in two (6.7%) and five patients (16.7%), respectively. FDG-PET accurately staged the disease in eighteen patients (60%) (p= 0.182).

CONCLUSION

To develop highly sensitive radioactive tests that show invasive local lymph node and peritoneal metastases, more studies in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer are needed. FDG-PET indicates a high specificity in the staging of gastric cancer. In patients who are planned for curative surgery, FDG-PET provides better staging when used with CT.

How useful is preoperative imaging for tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of gastric cancer? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the fundamental curative option for gastric cancer patients. Imaging scans are routinely prescribed in an attempt to stage the disease prior to surgery. Consequently, the correlation between radiology exams and pathology is crucial for appropriate treatment planning.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1998 to December 1, 2009. We calculated the accuracy, overstaging rate, understaging rate, Kappa statistic, sensitivity, and specificity for abdominal ultrasound (AUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) with respect to the gold standard (pathology). We also compared the performance of CT by detector number and image type. A meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

For pre-operative T staging MRI scans had better performance accuracy than CT and AUS; CT scanners using ≥ 4 detectors and multi-planar reformatted (MPR) images had higher staging performances than scanners with <4 detectors and axial images only. For pre-operative N staging PET had the lowest sensitivity, but the highest specificity among modalities; CT performance did not significantly differ by detector number or addition of MPR images. For pre-operative M staging performance did not significantly differ by modality, detector number, or MPR images.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between pre-operative TNM staging by imaging scans and post-operative staging by pathology is not perfect and may affect treatment decisions. Operator dependence and heterogeneity of data may account for the variations in staging performance. Physicians should consider this discrepancy when creating their treatment plans.