Terminology and reporting criteria for radiofrequency ablation of tumors in the scientific literature: systematic review of compliance with reporting standards

Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four articles (systematic review and meta-analysis, n = 18; systematic review only, n = 6) published between August 2009 and September 2021 in the Korean Journal of Radiology were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines' recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications.

CONCLUSION

Several items included in the PRISMA 2020 checklist were overlooked in systematic review and meta-analysis articles published in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication.

The Islanding effect - a special method of percutaneous peritumor ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: 15-year follow-up outcome

Percutaneous ethanol injection is a well-known ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and is well-tolerated, inexpensive, and effective with few adverse events. In this study, another type of ethanol injection was introduced in the present study.Sixty two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma received 133 percutaneous peritumor ethanol injection treatments and the 15-year follow-up outcomes were analyzed through a collected database.The technical efficiency was 89.5% (119/133 treatments) after the first percutaneous peritumor ethanol injection procedure. However, after the second repeated percutaneous peritumor ethanol injection procedure, technical efficiency increased to 98.5% (131/133 treatments). The 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years rates of tumor recurrence were 12.9%, 50.0%, 59.7%, 74.2%, and 74.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diabetes, Child-Pugh class B, and tumor size greater than 2 cm were significantly related to tumor recurrence. The 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years rates of overall survival were 98.4%, 83.6%, 61.3%, 19.4%, and 0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Child-Pugh class B, tumor size greater than 2 cm, and multiple tumors were significantly related to overall survival.Compared with other ablation methods (including peritumor ethanol injection), percutaneous peritumor ethanol injection can avoid tumor ruptures, reduce tumor proliferation and metastasis, and is suitable for the treatment of small tumors. In addition, when combined with other treatment methods, percutaneous peritumor ethanol injection can form a tumor metastatic isolation zone in advance and improve the comprehensive treatment effect.

Periprocedural outcome after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal tumors: a modified R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score adjusted comparison

BACKGROUND

Comparable oncological outcomes have been seen after surgical nephrectomy and thermal ablation of renal tumors recently. However, periprocedural outcome needs to be assessed for aiding treatment decision.

PURPOSE

To compare efficacy rates and periprocedural outcome (technical success, session time, hospitalization time, and complications) after renal tumor treatment with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The initial experience with 49 (treated with LPN) and 84 (treated with RFA) consecutive patients for a single renal tumor (diameter ≤ 5 cm, limited to the kidney) during 2007-2014 was evaluated. Patient and tumor characteristics, efficacy rates, and periprocedural outcome were collected retrospectively. The stratified Mantel Haenzel and Van Elteren tests, adjusted for tumor complexity (with the modified R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score [m-RNS]), were used to assess differences in treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Primary efficacy rate was 98% for LPN and 85.7% for RFA; secondary efficacy rate was 93.9% for LPN and 95.2% for RFA; and technical success rate was 87.8% for LPN and 100% for RFA. Median session (m-RNS adjusted P < 0.001; LPN 215 min, RFA 137 min) and median hospitalization time were longer after LPN (m-RNS adjusted P < 0.001; LPN 5 days, RFA 2 days). Side effects were uncommon (LPN 2%, RFA 4.8%). Complications were more frequent after LPN (m-RNS adjusted P < 0.001; LPN 42.9%, RFA 10.7%).

CONCLUSION

Both methods achieved equivalent secondary efficacy rates. RFA included several treatment sessions, but session and hospitalization times were shorter, and complications were less frequent than for LPN. The differences remained after adjustment for renal tumor complexity.

Microwave Ablation Compared With Laser Ablation for Treating Benign Thyroid Nodules in a Propensity-Score Matching Study

Objective: The efficacy and safety of percutaneous ultrasound-guided microwave and laser ablation (MWA and LA, respectively), for treating benign thyroid nodules (BTNs), were retrospectively compared. Methods: Patients (n = 318) underwent ablation of 328 BTNs. Confounding bias was reduced by propensity-score matching, and finally the MWA and LA groups each comprised 160 nodules. At baseline (before ablation), 3, 6, and 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter, the following were recorded: nodule volume reduction rate (VRR), neck symptom scores, cosmetic scores, complications, and side effects. Results: The baseline characteristics of the MWA and LA groups were comparable. The volumes of all nodules were less at all follow-ups relative to the baseline, as were the symptom and cosmetic scores at postoperative 6 months and thereafter (P < 0.01). At each follow-up, the overall VRRs of the MWA and LA groups were comparable. However, for nodules ≥13 mL, the VRR associated with LA at ≥6 months was significantly greater than that of MWA. The average ablation time for MWA was less than that of LA (P < 0.01). The overall incidences of major complications, minor complications, and side effects were 1.6, 2.2, and 18.4%, respectively, and there were no significant differences between the MWA and LA groups. Conclusion: Percutaneous ultrasound-guided MWA and LA are both safe and effective for the treatment of BTNs. Each can significantly reduce the nodule volume and improve the neck symptoms and appearance of patients, with a low incidence of adverse side effects. The efficiency of MWA is higher than that of LA. For nodules ≥13 mL, MWA may be preferred, but at 6 months and subsequent follow-ups the reduction in volume was greater in patients receiving LA.

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Early Evaluation of the Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation in Rabbit Liver VX2 Tumors

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the value of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-derived parameters for early evaluation of the efficiency of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment for rabbit liver VX2 tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen rabbit liver VX2 tumor models were constructed, and computed tomography-guided RFA was performed. One day before and 7 days after RFA, 18 models underwent magnetic resonance imaging, including contrast-enhanced imaging and IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging with 16 b-factors (0-1000 s/mm²). Post-RFA liver tumors were segmented into viable tumor, inflammatory reaction, and ablation necrotic regions according to gross and histopathologic examinations. Parameters derived from IVIM were calculated. One-way analysis of variance and least significant difference test were used for comparisons among the three regions. The diagnostic performance of parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

ADC_total, D, and f values were significantly lower in viable tumor than in inflammatory reaction regions (all P < .05), but D* showed no significant difference between the two regions. ADC_total values of viable tumor regions were significantly lower than that of ablation necrotic regions (P = .007), but D* values of necrotic regions were significantly lower than that of viable tumor regions (P = .045). In ROC analysis, ADC showed the highest area under the ROC curve for differentiating inflammatory reaction from viable tumor region.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC_total, D, and f were valuable discriminating markers for differentiation between regions of viable tumor and inflammatory reaction in post-RFA tumor, especially ADC_total outperformed the other two parameters with higher diagnostic performance.

US-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency versus Microwave Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Compared with microwave ablation (MWA), percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA) have been recommended as minimally invasive treatments for patients with symptomatic benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) because of the large number of clinical applications. This prospective multicenter study sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of RFA and MWA for BTNs. In eight participating institutions, the total number of 1252 patients treated by RFA and MWA were 649 ones with 687 BTNs and 603 ones with 664 BTNs, respectively. The clinical outcomes including the nodular maximal diameter reduction ratio (MDRR), the nodular volume reduction ratio (VRR), and the incidence of complications were compared to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two techniques. The results for the nodular MDRR and VRR in the RFA group were significantly better than those in the MWA group at 6 months and later follow-up, and the major complication rates of 4.78% and 6.63% in RFA and MWA groups showed no statistically significant differences. In conclusion, both RFA and MWA are safe and effective techniques for selected patients with symptomatic BTNs. The achieved MDRR and VRR in the RFA group were greater than those in the MWA group at 6 months and later follow-up.

Irreversible Electroporation (IRE): Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria for Analysis and Comparison

BACKGROUND

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) as newer ablation modality has been introduced and its clinical niche is under investigation. At present just one IRE system has been approved for clinical use and is currently commercially available (NanoKnife® system). In 2014, the International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation updated the recommendation about standardization of terms and reporting criteria for image-guided tumor ablation. The IRE method is not covered in detail. But the non-thermal IRE method and the NanoKnife System differ fundamentally from established ablations techniques, especially thermal approaches, e.g. radio frequency ablation (RFA).

MATERIAL/METHODS

As numerous publications on IRE with varying terminology exist so far - with numbers continuously increasing - standardized terms and reporting criteria of IRE are needed urgently. The use of standardized terminology may then allow for a better inter-study comparison of the methodology applied as well as results achieved.

RESULTS

Thus, the main objective of this document is to supplement the updated recommendation for image-guided tumor ablation by outlining a standardized set of terminology for the IRE procedure with the NanoKnife Sytem as well as address essential clinical and technical informations that should be provided when reporting on IRE tumor ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

We emphasize that the usage of all above recommended reporting criteria and terms can make IRE ablation reports comparable and provide treatment transparency to assess the current value of IRE and provide further development.