CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma in Korea: Mid-Term Outcomes

Assessment of Local Tumor Progression After Image-Guided Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Focal enhancement typically suggests local tumor progression (LTP) after renal cell carcinoma is percutaneously ablated. However, evaluating findings that are false positive or negative of LTP is less familiar to radiologists who have little experience with renal ablation. Various imaging features are encountered during and after thermal ablation. Ablation procedures and previous follow-up imaging should be reviewed before determining if there is LTP. Previous studies have focused on detecting the presence or absence of focal enhancement within the ablation zone. Therefore, various diagnostic pitfalls can be experienced using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging examinations. This review aimed to assess how to read images during or after ablation procedures, recognize imaging features of LTP and determine factors that influence LTP.

Effectiveness of Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma after Prior Partial Nephrectomy

Background

Repeat partial nephrectomy (PN) for tumors recurring in the ipsilateral kidney is associated with surgical complexity and a higher rate of complications.

Objective

To evaluate the local oncologic efficacy of thermal ablation (TA) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the ipsilateral kidney following PN.

Design setting participation

We included patients who underwent ablation for renal tumors in the ipsilateral kidney after PN between January 2005 and December 2019. Demographics, tumor size, procedural details, complications, pathology, local oncologic outcomes, and survival outcomes are described.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The procedural, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes are described. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results and limitations

A total of 66 patients (46 male and 20 female) with a median age of 62 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 52-69) met our inclusion criteria. In these patients, 74 TA procedures were performed for 86 lesions (median tumor size 1.9 cm, IQR 1.6-2.5). Radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation accounted for 60 (81%) and 14 (19%) procedures, respectively. Three patients (3.7%) had Clavien-Dindo grade III complications. Of 65 lesion biopsies, 62 (95.5%) were diagnostic. The most common subtype was clear cell RCC (n = 37). The median imaging follow-up duration was 60 mo (IQR 43-88). Recurrence in the ablation zone occurred for four lesions (4.6%) at a median of 6.9 mo (IQR 6.4-10.7). The rates of overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival were 93.1%, 94.4%, and 65.6% at 5 yr, and 71.6%, 94.4%, and 60.1% at 10 yr, respectively. Limitations include the retrospective design and the lack of a control group.

Conclusions

TA is effective for the treatment of RCC in the ipsilateral kidney following PN.

Patient summary

Heat treatment to remove tumor tissue is an effective option for small kidney masses recurring after partial kidney removal for cancer. Long-term follow-up data revealed that this treatment resulted in low recurrence and complication rates.

Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Solitary T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 20-Year Tertiary Cancer Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The aim is to determine the long-term oncologic and survival outcomes of the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of solitary de novo T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our renal ablation registry and included only patients with new solitary, biopsy-proven T1a RCC (<4 cm) who underwent RFA from January 2001 through December 2020. We collected patient and tumor characteristics. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 243 patients who met our inclusion criteria (160 male and 83 female, median age 68 years), 128 (52.6%) had another primary malignancy other than renal malignancy. Two-hundred forty-three RFA procedures were performed for 243 renal tumors of a median tumor size of 2.5 cm. The median follow-up period was 3.7 years. Most tumors (68.6%) were clear cell RCC. Ten patients (4.1%) experienced Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications. Seven patients(3.1%) developed recurrence at the ablation zone, and 11 (4.5%) developed recurrence elsewhere in the kidney. The 15-year local-recurrence- and disease-free survival were 96.5% and 88.6%, respectively. The 15-year metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA is a highly effective modality for the management of T1a RCC, with low complication and recurrence rates. Long-term data revealed favorable oncologic and survival outcomes.

Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Efficacy and Complications

Over the last two decades the detection rate of small renal masses has increased, due to improving diagnostic accuracy, and nephron-sparing treatments have become the first-choice curative option for small renal masses. As a minimally invasive alternative, thermal ablation has increased in popularity, offering a good clinical outcome and low recurrence rate. Radiofrequency ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave ablation are the main ablative techniques. All of them are mostly overlapping in term of cancer specific free survival and outcomes. These techniques require imaging study to assess lesions features and to plan the procedure: US, CT, and both of them together are the leading guidance alternatives. Imaging findings guide the interventional radiologist in assessing the risk of complication and possible residual disease after procedure. The purpose of this review is to compare different ablative modalities and different imaging guides, underlining the effectiveness, outcomes, and complications related to each of them, in order to assist the interventional radiologist in choosing the best option for the patient.

Risk Factors for Renal Function Impairment Following Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Tumors

Purpose

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Tubulocystic Renal Cell Carcinoma Is Not an Indolent Tumor: A Case Report of Recurrences in the Retroperitoneum and Contralateral Kidney

Tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare subtype of RCC that was recently included in the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the kidney. Most of these tumors exhibit indolent behavior with low metastatic potential. However, here we report a case of recurrent tubulocystic RCC with aggressive features in the retroperitoneum and contralateral kidney treated with targeted agents and radiofrequency ablation.

Real-Time US-CT fusion imaging for guidance of thermal ablation in of renal tumors invisible or poorly visible with US: results in 97 cases

PURPOSE

To assess the capability of ultrasound-computed tomography (US-CT) fusion imaging to guide a precise targeting of renal tumors invisible or poorly visible with US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2016 renal tumors poorly visible or inconspicuous/invisible at US were treated at our institution with the guidance of US/CT fusion in a room equipped with CT scanner. Feasibility of the procedure, accuracy of targeting, complications, and technique efficacy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 227 patients treated from 2016 to March 2020, 91 patients (65 males and 26 females, mean age 68.5 ± 10.1 years) with 97 renal lesions (mean maximum diameter 21.6 ± 9.4 mm) inconspicuous/invisible (29/97, 29.9%) or poorly visible (68/97, 70.1%) at US underwent treatment under US-CT fusion guidance. US-CT fusion imaging guidance was always technically feasible and enabled correct targeting in 97/97/(100%) of cases. Technical success was achieved in 93/97 lesions (95.9%). Three lesions were retreated during the same ablative session, while 1 was retreated in a subsequent session. Thus, primary efficacy was achieved in one session in 96/97 (98.9%) cases and secondary efficacy in 97/97 (100%) cases.

CONCLUSION

US-CT image fusion guidance allows for a correct tumor targeting of renal tumors poorly visible or inconspicuous/invisible with US alone, with a high rate of technical success and technique efficacy.

Long-term outcomes of CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation of T1a and T1b renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of computed tomography-guided percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for biopsy-confirmed renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study investigating all patients treated with PCA between January 2010 and February 2019 for RCC tumors. Primary outcome measures included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Secondary outcome measures included kidney function, complications, technical success, hospital stay, procedural time, and the identification of factors affecting the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-three consecutive patients with 54 lesions (T1a: 49/54; T1b: 5/54) were included. Mean tumor diameter was 28.0±8.5 mm and mean R.E.N.A.L. score was 7.2±2.0. Technical success was 100% (54/54 lesions) after two reinterventions for incomplete ablation. Mean follow-up time was 46.7±28.6 months (range, 3-122 months). Local recurrence was noted in 5 patients (9.2%). According to Kaplan-Meyer analysis, OS was 98.2%, 94.2%, 71.2%, and 58.2% at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years. One patient (1.9%) died of cancer and CSS was 95.8% at 8 years. DFS was 100.0%, 95.5%, and 88.6%, and PFS was 100%, 94.3%, and 91.0%, at 1, 2, and 5 years. Clavien-Dindo grade II complication rate was 7.8% (5/64 procedures). There were no complications classified as grade III or greater. Mean creatinine increase was 7.1±6.3 μm/L (p = 0.31). No patient advanced to dialysis during follow up. Mean procedural time was 163±45 min. Median hospital stay was 2.0 days (IQR, 1-2.5 days). Diabetes was the only independent predictor of decreased OS (hazard ratio 4.3, 95% CI 0.043-0.914; p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

PCA for stage T1a and T1b RCC provides favorable long-term oncological and renal function preservation outcomes, with acceptable complication rates.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Biopsy-Proven T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients With Other Primary Malignancies

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to investigate the oncologic effectiveness and survival outcomes of percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation for clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with other primary nonrenal malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed records of patients with histologically proven T1a RCC (< 4.0 cm) treated with thermal ablation over a period of 10 years between January 2005 and December 2014. We recorded past or current history of primary malignancy other than RCC, status of the primary malignancy, tumor histology (in remission or under therapy), and whether patient was currently alive or not, and if not, the date and reason of death. Three cohorts were studied: patients with RCC only (group A), patients with RCC and other primary malignancy in remission (group B), and patients with RCC and other primary malignancy under treatment (group C). The Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to estimate the survival rates. RESULTS. One hundred nine patients met the inclusion criteria (109 lesions, 110 ablation procedures). There were 46, 45, and 18 patients in the A, B, and C groups, respectively. The 5-year survival was 87%, 63%, and 40% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The local recurrence-free survival for the whole sample was 95% at 3, 5, and 10 years. The disease-free survival was 96%, 93%, and 91% at 3, 5, and 10 years. Although a significant difference is noted between the three cohorts in overall survival (p = .02); for RCC, there were no significance differences in the local recurrence-free, disease-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survivals. In addition, there was no difference in outcomes for patients in group B (in remission) when compared with those in group C (under treatment). CONCLUSION. Thermal ablation is an effective and safe modality of treatment of T1a RCC in patients with other primary malignancies that are in remission or under treatment.

Real-time US/cone-beam CT fusion imaging for percutaneous ablation of small renal tumours: a technical note

INTRODUCTION

Fusion imaging is gaining attention as an imaging technique to assist minimally invasive tumour ablation. Ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) are the most common imaging modalities to guide thermal ablation of renal tumours, yet cone-beam CT (CBCT) has recently been described to successfully assist percutaneous renal interventions. Our goal was to evaluate primary technical success and correct lesion targeting of US/CBCT fusion imaging to guide the ablation of kidney masses < 2 cm in a small group of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six renal lesions (maximum diameter 11-17 mm) were treated with RFA in 5 different patients using real-time US/CBCT. Fusion imaging was used to identify and monitor tumour ablation. Demographics, tumour characteristics and mean serum creatinine levels were recorded before and after the procedure. Primary technical success and correct lesion targeting represented the main endpoints of the study. Primary technique efficacy was confirmed at 1-month and 3-month contrast-enhanced CT follow-ups.

RESULTS

In all cases, a confident US/CBCT synchronisation was reached and allowed for a correct targeting and a successful percutaneous ablation. Primary technique efficacy was 100%. No recurrence was observed at the follow-up that ranged from 8 to 26 months (mean 16 months).

CONCLUSIONS

US/CBCT fusion proved to be a viable method to precisely guide safe and effective percutaneous thermal ablation in patients with small renal tumours, especially when hardly detectable on US.

KEY POINTS

• US/CBCT fusion imaging for renal ablation is safe and feasible. • US/CBCT fusion imaging allows for an improved targeting and complete ablation of small RCC with poor US-conspicuity.

Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation guidelines for renal cell carcinoma

Thermal ablation has been established as an alternative treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients who are poor candidates for surgery. However, while American and European guidelines have been established for American and European patients, respectively, no ablation guidelines for Asian patients with RCCs have been established many years after the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation (ACTA) had been held. Given that Western guidelines are difficult to apply to Asian patients due to differences in body habitus, economic status, and insurance systems, the current review sought to establish the first version of the ACTA guidelines for treating a RCC with thermal ablation.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Category T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Intermediate Results on Safety, Technical Feasibility, and Clinical Outcomes of 119 Tumors

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety, technical results, and clinical outcomes of CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of category T1a renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study investigated consecutive patients who underwent CT-guided microwave ablation for T1a renal cell carcinoma from October 2015 to May 2019. Patient demographics including tumor characteristics, comorbidities, technical details, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Local progression-free survival and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS. One hundred-six patients including 70 men (mean age, 68.5 ± 8.9 [SD] years; range, 49-86 years) and 36 women (mean age, 69.5 ± 10.0 years; range, 50-88 years) with an overall mean age of 68.8 ± 9.2 years (range, 49-88 years) with 119 T1a renal cell carcinomas were treated with CT-guided microwave ablation. Technical success was achieved for 100% of the tumors. Complete response was achieved in 101 (95.3%) patients and partial response was achieved in five (4.7%) patients. Local progression-free survival was 100.0%, 92.8%, and 90.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Overall survival was 99.0%, 97.7%, and 94.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Six patients (5.7%) had seven complications (five with Clavien-Dindo Grade I, Society of Interventional Radiology [SIR] category A, two with Clavien-Dindo Grade III, SIR category B) within 30 days of the procedure. CONCLUSION. CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation is associated with high rates of technical success, excellent local progression-free survival and overall survival, and a low complication rate for category T1a renal cell carcinoma.

Long-Term Follow-Up Outcomes after Percutaneous US/CT-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for cT1a-b Renal Masses: Experience from Single High-Volume Referral Center

Image-guided thermal ablations are increasingly applied in the treatment of renal cancers, under the guidance of ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT). Sometimes, multiple ablations are needed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term results in patients with renal mass treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with both US and CT, with a focus on the multiple ablations rate. 149 patients (median age 67 years) underwent RFA from January 2008 to June 2015. Median tumor diameter was 25 mm (IQR 17–32 mm). Median follow-up was 54 months (IQR 44–68). 27 (18.1%) patients received multiple successful ablations, due to incomplete ablation (10 patients), local tumor progression (8 patients), distant tumor progression (4 patients) or multiple tumor foci (5 patients), with a primary and secondary technical efficacy of 100%. Complications occurred in 13 (8.7%) patients (6 grade A, 5 grade C, 2 grade D). 24 patients died during follow-up, all for causes unrelated to renal cancer. In conclusion, thermal ablations with the guidance of US and CT are safe and effective in the treatment of renal tumors in the long-term period, with a low rate of patients requiring multiple treatments over the course of their disease.

Performance of a New Blunt-Tip Needle for the Displacement of Critical Structure in Thermal Ablation

PURPOSE

To ascertain the performance of a new blunt-tip needle (HydroGuard^®), which allows injection of fluids during needle advancement in order to safely approach, displace and insulate nearby critical structures during thermal ablation (TA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 27 consecutive patients treated by TA [cryoablation (CA), radiofrequency (RFA), and microwave MWA)] between April 2018 and January 2019. During TA, hydro- or gas dissection was performed with HydroGuard^® needle to displace and protect critical structures close to the tumor (< 10 mm). Technical and clinical success, distance between critical structure and tumor before and after hydro/gas dissection and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were treated by CA (66.7%), 7 by MWA (25.9%) and 2 by RFA (7.4%). Majority of patients were treated with a curative intent (24/27; 88.8%). Adjacent critical structures include vessels (n = 3), nerves (n = 10), ureter/renal pelvis (n = 3), bowel/rectum (n = 10), stomach: (n = 3), diaphragm (n = 2), and pleura (n = 1). Technical success was 100%. Clinical success was 88% (24/27). Median minimum distance to adjacent critical structures before hydro/gas dissection was 1 mm (range 0-9 mm; IQR: 0-3 mm) versus 10.5 mm (range 4-47 mm; IQR: 9.7-18 mm) after displacement. Of the 27 patients treated, four developed complications (14.8%; 95% CI: 1.4-28.2): 1 major (3.7%; 95% CI: 0-10.8) and 3 minors (11.1%; 95% CI: 0-23). Only one minor complication was related to inadequate hydro-dissection, resulting in close proximity of the critical structure to the ablation zone.

CONCLUSION

HydroGuard^® is a safe and effective needle when used to approach, displace and insulate nearby critical structures during TA.

Local tumor progression after ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of stage T1a renal cell carcinoma: risk factors analysis of 171 tumors

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review long-term oncologic outcomes after ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to identify the incidence and risk factors that predict local tumor progression (LTP) after MWA of RCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was approved by the institutional review board. A total of 162 patients with 171 RCC nodules (mean size, 2.6 ± 0.8 cm; range, 0.6-4.0 cm) were treated by MWA between April 2006 and January 2017. The influence of eight factors (age; sex; longest tumor diameter; tumor number, location and pathology type; ablation power and time) affecting the risk of LTP was assessed. Univariate Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

LTP occurred in five patients (5 tumors) after US-guided percutaneous MWA of stage T1a RCC. The overall occurrence of LTP was 2.9% per tumor and 3.0% per patient with a median follow-up of 45.5 months. Among the 162 patients, there were no instances of LTP-related deaths; however, 20 patients died of other diseases. All patients with LTP survived through follow-up. The survival rate of LTP-free patients at 1, 3 and 5 years were 98.7%, 89.5% and 82.1%, respectively (p = .38). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified tumor location to be the only independent predictor of LTP.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided percutaneous MWA for T1a RCC achieved a relatively low LTP incidence rate. Tumors adjacent to the renal pelvis or bowel increased the potential of LTP occurrence.

RFA versus robotic partial nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched comparison of mid-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

To compare oncological and functional mid-term outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using propensity score-matching.

METHODS

Between December 2008-April 2016, 63 patients from each treatment group were propensity score-matched for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumour size, tumour laterality, tumour histology, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Post-treatment follow-up periods for RPN and RFA ranged from 1-90 months (median, 24.6) and 1-65 months (21), respectively. Tumour location, percentage of eGFR preservation and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Exophytic and endophytic RCC occurred in 73.0 % (46/63) and 27.0 % (17/63) of the RPN group, and 52.4 % (33/63) and 47.6 % (30/63) of the RFA group, respectively (p=0.017). There was 91.7 % preservation of eGFR in the RPN group and 86.8 % in the RFA group (p=0.088). Two-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100 % in the RPN and 95.2 % in the RFA group (p=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

RPN provides a higher recurrence-free survival rate than RFA. However, RFA is a better treatment option for an endophytic or recurrent RCC that is difficult to treat with RPN.

KEY POINTS

• RPN provides a higher recurrence-free survival rate than RFA. • Unlike RPN, repeat RFA is easy to perform for recurrent RCC. • Endophytic RCC could be better treated with RFA.

Comparison of General Anesthesia and Conscious Sedation during Computed Tomography–Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is so painful that this treatment requires pain control such as conscious sedation or general anesthesia. It is still unclear which type of anesthesia is better for treatment outcomes of renal cell carcinoma. This study aimed to compare general anesthesia and conscious sedation in treating patients with renal cell carcinoma with radiofrequency ablation.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2015, 51 patients with biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (<4 cm) were treated with computed tomography–guided radiofrequency ablation. General anesthesia was performed in 41 and conscious sedation was performed in 10 patients. Tumour size, local tumour progression, metastasis, major complication, effective dose, glomerular filtration rate difference, and recurrence-free survival rate were compared between these groups.

Results

The mean tumour size was 2.1 cm in both groups ( P = .673). Local tumour progression occurred in 0% (0 of 41) of the general anesthesia group, but in 40% (4 of 10) of the conscious sedation group ( P = .001). Metastases in these groups occurred in 2.4% (1 of 41) of the general anesthesia group and 20% (2 of 10) of the conscious sedation group ( P = .094). No major complications developed in either group after the first radiofrequency ablation session. The mean effective doses in these groups were 21.7 mSv and 21.2 mSv, respectively ( P = .868). The mean glomerular filtration rate differences in the general anesthesia and conscious sedation groups were −13.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 and −19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively ( P = .575). Three-year recurrence-free survival rates in these groups were 97.6% and 60.0%, respectively ( P = .001).

Conclusions

General anesthesia may provide better intermediate outcomes than conscious sedation in treating small renal cell carcinomas with radiofrequency ablation.

Low-dose CT protocols for guiding radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small renal cell carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) results in a high radiation dose. This study aimed to assess low-dose CT protocols for guiding RFA and oncologic outcomes for the treatment of small renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2011 and December 2014, CT-guided RFA was performed in 31 patients with 31 biopsy-proven RCCs (median, 2.1 cm). RFA included planning, targeting, monitoring and survey phases. The dose length product (DLP), CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), effective dose, number of scans, scan range, tube current and exposure time of RFA phases were compared. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was recorded. Nonparametric or parametric repeated-measures ANOVA with Dunn's or Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The median total DLP, CTDIvol and effective dose of CT-guided RFA procedures per session were 1238.8 mGy (range 517.4-3391.7 mGy), 259.7 mGy (10.7-67.9 mGy) and 18.6 mSv (7.8-50.9 mSv), respectively. The median DLP, CTDIvol, effective dose, number of scans, tube current and exposure time during the targeting phase were higher than those during the other phases (p < 0.001). The scan range in the targeting phase was the same as that in the monitoring phase (p > 0.05) but smaller than those in the planning and survey phases (p < 0.001). The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 96.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose CT protocols for guiding RFA may reduce radiation dose without compromising oncologic outcomes. Reducing the number of scans during the targeting phase contributes to dose reduction.

Renal Cell Carcinoma: Alternative Nephron-Sparing Treatment Options for Small Renal Masses, a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is (partial) nephrectomy. For patients where surgery is not the treatment of choice, for example in the elderly, in case of severe comorbidity, inoperability, or refusal of surgery, alternative treatment options are available. These treatment options include active surveillance (AS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). In the present overview, the efficacy, safety, and outcome of these different options are summarized, particularly focusing on recent developments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases of MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The search was performed in December 2016, and included a search period from 2010 to 2016. The terms and synonyms used were renal cell carcinoma, active surveillance, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The database search identified 2806 records, in total 73 articles were included to assess the rationale and clinical evidence of alternative treatment modalities for small renal masses. The methodological quality of the included articles varied between level 2b and level 4.

CONCLUSION

Alternative treatment modalities, such as AS, RFA, CA, MWA, and SBRT, are treatment options especially for those patients who are unfit to undergo an invasive treatment. There are no randomized controlled trials available comparing surgery and less invasive modalities, leading to a low quality on the reported articles. A case-controlled registry might be an alternative to compare outcomes of noninvasive treatment modalities in the future.