Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology. Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: 2016 Consensus Recommendations of the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent form of liver cancer globally, poses a substantial health burden. Influenced by risk factors such as hepatitis B or C virus infections, chronic consumption of alcohol, and metabolic dysfunction, its exact etiology likely involves a complex interplay between viral infection, hepatocyte mutations, and chronic liver diseases like cirrhosis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, and demographic variables like sex, race, and age. Disease stage significantly impacts the prognosis of HCC. There is significant potential for life-saving and socioeconomic benefits through the implementation of surveillance programs and the introduction of low-cost screening measures for high-risk groups; these screening measures include ultrasound imaging and blood tests. Treatment options for HCC encompass liver resection, transplantation, transarterial chemoembolization, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Despite therapeutic advances, treating advanced HCC remains challenging, emphasizing the need for continued efforts in prevention, early detection, and development of treatments to improve prognosis and long-term survival.

Abbreviated MRI for Secondary Surveillance of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Presumed Curative Treatment

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the performance of abbreviated MRI (AMRI) for secondary surveillance of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the detection performance of AMRI for secondary surveillance of HCC after curative treatment.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 243 patients (183 men and 60 women; median age, 65 years) who underwent secondary surveillance for HCC using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI after more than 2 year of disease-free period following curative treatment, including surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T/noncontrast AMRI (NC-AMRI) (T2-weighted fast spin-echo, T1-weighted gradient echo, and diffusion-weighted images), hepatobiliary phase AMRI (HBP-AMRI) (T2-weighted fast spin-echo, diffusion-weighted, and HBP images), and full-sequence MRI ASSESSMENT: Four board-certified radiologists independently reviewed NC-AMRI, HBP-AMRI, and full-sequence MRI sets of each patient for detecting recurrent HCC.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Per-lesion sensitivity, per-patient sensitivity and specificity for HCC detection at each set were compared using generalized estimating equation.

RESULTS

A total of 42 recurred HCCs were confirmed in the 39 patients. The per-lesion and per-patient sensitivities did not show significant differences among the three image sets for either reviewer (P ≥ 0.358): per-lesion sensitivity: 59.5%-83.3%, 59.5%-85.7%, and 59.5%-83.3%, and per-patient sensitivity: 53.9%-83.3%, 56.4%-85.7%, and 53.9%-83.3% for NC-AMRI, HBP-AMRI, and full-sequence MRI, respectively. Per-lesion pooled sensitivities of NC-AMRI, HBP-AMRI, and full-sequence MRI were 72.6%, 73.2%, and 73.2%, with difference of -0.6% (95% confidence interval: -6.7, 5.5) between NC-AMRI and full-sequence MRI and 0.0% (-6.1, 6.1) between HBP-AMRI and full-sequence MRI. Per-patient specificity was not significantly different among the three image sets for both reviewers (95.6%-97.1%, 95.6%-97.1%, and 97.6%-98.5% for NC-AMRI and HBP-AMRI, respectively; P ≥ 0.117).

DATA CONCLUSION

NC-AMRI and HBP-AMRI showed no significant difference in detection performance to that of full-sequence gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI during secondary surveillance for HCC after more than 2-year disease free interval following curative treatment. Based on its good detection performance, short scan time, and lack of contrast agent-associated risks, NC-AMRI is a promising option for the secondary surveillance of HCC.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

3.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

Hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may improve accuracy of predicting the size of hepatocellular carcinoma at pathology

BACKGROUND

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, scientific evidence is lacking for recommending a particular sequence for measuring tumor size.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare the size of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measured on different gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI sequences using pathology as a reference.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 217 patients with single HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before surgery were included. The size of the HCC was measured by two abdominal radiologists independently on the following sequences: T1-weighted; T2-weighted; b-500 diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); and arterial, portal venous, transitional, and hepatobiliary phases. Tumor size measured on MRI was compared with pathological size by using Pearson correlation coefficient, independent-sample t test, and Bland-Altman plot. Agreement between two readers was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Correlation between the MR images and pathology was high for both readers (0.899-0.955). Absolute error between MRI and pathologic assessment was lowest on hepatobiliary phase images for both readers (reader 1, 2.8±4.2 mm; reader 2, 3.2±3.4 mm) and highest on arterial phase images for reader 1 (4.9±4.4 mm) and DWI phase images for reader 2 (5.1±4.9 mm). Absolute errors were significantly different for hepatobiliary phase compared with other sequences for both readers (reader 1, P≤0.012; reader 2, P≤0.037). Inter-reader agreements for all sequence measurements were strong (0.971-0.997).

CONCLUSION

The performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI sequences varied with HCC size, and the hepatobiliary phase may be optimal among these sequences.

Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI as a Diagnostic Tool in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Report from a 2020 Asia-Pacific Multidisciplinary Expert Meeting

Gadoxetate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in clinical practice for liver imaging. For optimal use, we must understand both its advantages and limitations. This article is the outcome of an online advisory board meeting and subsequent discussions by a multidisciplinary group of experts on liver diseases across the Asia-Pacific region, first held on September 28, 2020. Here, we review the technical considerations for the use of gadoxetate, its current role in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and its relevance in consensus guidelines for HCC imaging diagnosis. In the latter part of this review, we examine recent evidence evaluating the impact of gadoxetate on clinical outcomes on a continuum from diagnosis to treatment decision-making and follow-up. In conclusion, we outline the potential future roles of gadoxetate MRI based on an evolving understanding of the clinical utility of this contrast agent in the management of patients at risk of, or with, HCC.

A New Reporting System for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B With Clinical and Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI Features

BACKGROUND

Current major guidelines for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on imaging findings are different from each other and do not include clinical risk factors as a diagnostic criteria.

PURPOSE

To developed and validated a new diagnostic score system using MRI and clinical features as applied in chronic hepatitis B patients.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective observational study.

SUBJECT

A total of 418 treatment-naïve patients (out of 902 patients) with chronic hepatitis B having 556 lesions suspected for HCC which were eligible for curative treatment.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

T1W GRE in- and opposed-phase, T2W FSE, DWI, and T1W 3D-GRE dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences at 1.5  T and 3  T.

ASSESSMENT

Six radiologists with 7-22 years of experience independently evaluated MR images based on Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Based on logistic regression analysis of MRI features and clinical factors, a risk score system was devised in derivation cohorts (268 patients, 352 lesions) and externally validated (150 patients, 204 lesions). The performance of the new score system was assessed by Harell's c-index. Using cutoff value of 12, maintaining positive predictive value ≥95%, the diagnostic performances of the score system were compared with those of LR-5.

RESULTS

The 15-point diagnostic scoring system used MRI features (lesion size, nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement, portal venous phase hypointensity, hepatobiliary phase hypointensity, and diffusion restriction) and clinical factors (alpha-fetoprotein and platelet). It showed good discrimination in the derivation (c-index, 0.946) and validation cohorts (c-index, 0.907). Using a risk score of 12 as a cut-off, this system yielded higher sensitivity than LR-5 (derivation cohort, 76.8% vs. 52.1%; validation cohort, 73.4% vs. 49.5%) without significant decrease in specificity (derivation cohort, 93.1% vs. 97.2%, P = 0.074; validation cohort, 91.7% vs. 96.1%, P = 0.299).

DATA CONCLUSION

A new score system showed improved sensitivity in chronic hepatitis B patients compared to LI-RADS without significant compromise in specificity. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

[State of the art in the diagnostics of hepatocellular carcinoma and current treatment options]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary hepatic malignancy and arises most often based on liver cirrhosis. Of the HCC 80-85% demonstrate a typical contrast medium behavior in imaging, characterized by arterial hypervascularization followed by wash-out in the portal or late venous phase. This specific contrast behavior is diagnostic for HCC in patients at risk. The use of liver-specific contrast agents increases the sensitivity for diagnosis of HCC and can facilitate the differentiation from other liver lesions. At initial diagnosis approximately 50% of HCC are solitary, 40% multifocal and 10% diffuse. Depending on the tumor extent and stage, therapeutic options in patients with HCC include local treatment (resection, ablation, radiation, liver transplantation), locoregional measures (transarterial chemoembolization, selective internal radiotherapy) or systemic therapy (including immunotherapy), either as a stand-alone procedure or in various combinations.

Identifying the Prognostic Risk Factors of Synaptojanin 2 and Its Underlying Perturbations Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Synaptojanin 2 (SYNJ2) regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis via dephosphorylating plasma membrane phosphoinositides. Aim of this study is to first seek the full-scale expression levels and potential emerging roles of SYNJ2 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We systematically analyzed SYNJ2 mRNA expression and protein levels in HCC tissues based on large-scale data and in-house immunohistochemistry (IHC). The clinical significance and risk factors for SYNJ2-related HCC cases were identified. A nomogram of prognosis was created and its performance was validated by concordance index (C-index) and shown in calibration plots. Based on the identified differentially coexpressed genes (DCGs) of SYNJ2, enriched annotations and potential pathways were predicted, and the protein interacting networks were mapped. Upregulated SYNJ2 in 3,728 HCC and 3,203 non-HCC tissues were verified and in-house IHC showed higher protein levels of SYNJ2 in HCC tissues. Pathologic T stage was identified as a risk factor. Upregulated mRNA levels and mutated SYNJ2 might cause a poorer outcome. The C-index of the nomogram model constructed by SYNJ2 level, age, gender, TNM classification, grade, and stage was evaluated as 0.643 (95%CI = 0.619–0.668) with well-calibrated plots. A total of 2,533 DCGs were extracted and mainly functioned together with SYNJ2 in metabolic pathways. Possible transcriptional axis of CTCF/POLR2A-SYNJ2/INPP5B (transcription factor-target) in metabolic pathways was discovered based on ChIP-seq datasets. In summary, transcriptional regulatory axis CTCF/POLR2A-SYNJ2 might influence SYNJ2 expression levels. Increased SYNJ2 expression level could be utilized for predicting HCC prognosis and potentially accelerates the occurrence and development of HCC via metabolic perturbations pathways.

Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging may improve the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

To determine the clinical value of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 246 high-risk patients with 263 selected nodules (126 HCCs, 137 non-HCCs) undergoing gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in the study. Imaging-based diagnoses of small (≤3 cm) and large (>3 cm) HCCs were made using the following 4 criteria: (I) non-rim arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) plus hypointensity on the portal venous phase (PVP); (II) non-rim APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or transitional phase (TP); (III) non-rim APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or TP and/or HBP; (IV) criterion 3 plus non-LR-1/2/M. Based on typical imaging features, LR-1, LR-2, or LR-M (if definitely benign, probably benign, malignant but not HCC specific, respectively) were defined according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Sensitivities and specificities of imaging criteria were calculated and compared using McNemar’s test.

Results

Among the diagnostic criteria for small HCCs, criterion 3 and 4, which included HBP hypointensity, showed significantly higher sensitivities (96.4% and 94.6%, respectively) than criterion 1 (58.9%, P<0.001 for both). Moreover, criterion 4, which included HBP hypointensity and ancillary features, showed significantly higher specificity (94.7%) than criterion 3 (66.7%, P<0.001) and comparable specificity to criterion 1 (97.4%, P=0.375), achieving the highest accuracies (94.7%). The diagnostic performance of criterion 4 for large HCCs was similar to that for small HCCs.

Conclusions

HBP hypointensity acquired from Gd-BOPTA-MRI can improve sensitivity and maintain high specificity in the diagnosis of both small and large HCCs after excluding benignities or non-HCC malignancies according to characteristic imaging features.

Diagnostic Performance of Simulated Abbreviated MRI for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening: A Comparison to Conventional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

Purpose

To compare the per-patient diagnostic performance of simulated abbreviated MRI (AMRI) to that of conventional MRI (CMRI) with full-sequence dynamic gadoxetic acid (GA) enhancement for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in high-risk patients.

Materials and Methods

A total of 201 consecutive patients at high-risk for HCC, who underwent 3T liver MRI, were included in this retrospective study. The AMRI protocol comprised T2-weighted imaging, hepatobiliary phase imaging after GA injection, and diffusion-weighted imaging. For each patient, two AMRI and CMRI image sets were independently reviewed by two radiologists. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Cohen's kappa value. A composite reference standard was used to determine the diagnostic performance of each image set for each reader.

Results

A total of 93 HCCs were detected in 79 patients. The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for both image sets (κ = 0.839, 0.948). In AMRI, the per-patient sensitivity and negative predictive values (NPV) were 94.9% and 96.4%, respectively. In CMRI, the per-patient sensitivity and NPV were 96.2% and 97.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

AMRI, using only three sequences, had a comparable diagnostic performance to CMRI in screening early-stage HCC. AMRI could be an alternative HCC screening tool for high-risk HCC patients.

Subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma in treatment-naïve patients: noninvasive diagnostic criteria and tumor staging on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVE

It is controversial to adopt non-invasive diagnostic criteria of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in subcentimeter lesions. This study was aimed to define the optimal noninvasive diagnostic criteria of subcentimeter HCC and to evaluate the effect on tumor staging.

METHODS

We included 110 treatment-naïve patients at risk of HCC and eligible for curative treatment who had subcentimeter lesions (n = 136) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed between January 2013 and December 2013. Modified diagnostic criteria for subcentimeter HCC were developed using logistic regression analysis. Accuracies of MR staging with and without using the modified criteria were compared by generalized estimating equation test using pathologic staging as reference standards. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with co-existing HCC ≥ 1 cm (co-HCC).

RESULTS

The modified criteria (presence of co-HCC, arterial phase hyperenhancement, and hypointensity on transitional phase [TP]) showed 61.5% (95% CI, 41.6-78.2) of sensitivity and 98.2% (95% CI, 93.0-99.5) of specificity. Including subcentimeter HCCs improved the accuracy of MR staging from 84.5 to 94.5% (p = 0.001). Fifty percent of subcentimeter lesions found in patients with co-HCCs were HCC, whereas 5.9% of them without co-HCCs were HCC (p = 0.001). In the subgroup with co-HCCs, the accuracy of MR staging with subcentimeter HCCs was improved from 69.0% to 92.8% (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Including subcentimeter HCCs based on the modified diagnostic criteria (co-existing HCC ≥ 1 cm, arterial phase hyperenhancement, and hypointensity on TP) improved MR staging accuracy.

KEY POINTS

• Fifty percent of non-benign appearing subcentimeter lesions found in patients with co-HCCs were HCC, whereas 5.9% of them without co-HCCs were HCC (p = 0.001). • Including subcentimeter HCCs improved the accuracy of MR staging from 84.5 to 94.5% (p = 0.001).

Extended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging in LI-RADS version 2018: a strategy to improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) utilizing subtraction AP (arterial phase) imaging only for T1 hyperintense observations compared with the detection of HCC on subtraction AP imaging that included T1 hyper-, iso-, and hypointense lesions on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 234 patients (311 observations including 239 HCCs) at high risk for HCC who underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI with subtraction AP imaging between 2015 and 2017. Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was divided into two subtypes: conventional APHE, where subtraction AP imaging is used to detect APHE only for T1 hyperintense observations; and modified APHE, where subtraction AP imaging is applied to T1 hyper-, iso-, and hypointense lesions. Two readers independently reviewed all observations and the per-observation diagnostic performances were compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Modified nonrim APHE showed significantly higher sensitivity than conventional nonrim APHE (90.0% vs 82.8%; p < 0.001) for diagnosing HCC, without a significant difference in specificity (66.7% vs 68.1%; p > 0.999). The LR-5 category with modified nonrim APHE provided better sensitivity than the LR-5 with conventional nonrim APHE (70.3% vs 63.2%; p < 0.001), without a significant decrease in specificity (94.4% vs 95.8%; p > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

Extended application of subtraction AP imaging for T1 hypo- or isointense observations on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI can improve sensitivity in the diagnosis of HCC without a significant difference in specificity.

KEY POINTS

• Modified nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), extended application of subtraction arterial phase imaging for T1 hypo- or isointense observation, outperforms conventional nonrim APHE. • The LR-5 category with modified nonrim APHE provided better sensitivity in diagnosing HCC than the LR-5 with conventional APHE, without a significant decrease in specificity.

Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology

Radiologic imaging is important for evaluating extrahepatic bile duct (EHD) cancers; it is used for staging tumors and evaluating the suitability of surgical resection, as surgery may be contraindicated in some cases regardless of tumor stage. However, the published general recommendations for EHD cancer and recommendations guided by the perspectives of radiologists are limited. The Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology (KSAR) study group for EHD cancer developed key questions and corresponding recommendations for the radiologic evaluation of EHD cancer and organized them into 4 sections: nomenclature and definition, imaging technique, cancer evaluation, and tumor response. A structured reporting form was also developed to allow the progressive accumulation of standardized data, which will facilitate multicenter studies and contribute more evidence for the development of recommendations.

Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 ancillary features to upgrade from LR-4 to LR-5 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

The current LR-5 criteria of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) determined by only major features provide high specificity, but unsatisfactorily low sensitivity for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to identify significant ancillary features (AFs) in LI-RADS version 2018 and develop the upgraded LR-5 criteria to improve diagnostic performance on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 280 patients (366 observations including 281 HCCs) at high-risk for HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI between 2015 and 2017. Two readers evaluated major features and AFs for each observation and assigned a LI-RADS category. Independently significant AFs were identified through logistic regression analysis. Upgraded LR-5 criteria were developed by combining independently significant AFs with LR-4 assigned by major features alone. Sensitivities and specificities of the diagnostic criteria were compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Two of the AFs favoring malignancy in general (mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity) and two of the AFs favoring HCC in particular (nonenhancing "capsule" and mosaic architecture) were independently significant features for diagnosing HCC. By using the upgraded LR-5 criteria (LR-4 by major features alone + each aforementioned AF), sensitivities were significantly increased (69.4-76.9%) compared with the standard LR-5 (66.2%; all, p ≤ 0.004), whereas specificities (95.3-96.5%) were not significantly different (96.5%; all, p > 0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Independently significant AFs may be used to upgrade from LR-4 to LR-5 to improve sensitivity without impairing specificity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Independently significant AFs for HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, hepatobiliary phase hypointensity, nonenhancing "capsule," and mosaic architecture. • When LR-4 criteria by major features alone in combination with significant AFs were upgraded to LR-5, sensitivities were higher than the standard LR-5, without impairing specificity. • Independently significant ancillary features in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018 may be used to upgrade from LR-4 to LR-5 to improve sensitivity without impairing specificity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Intraindividual Comparison between Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Dynamic Computed Tomography for Characterizing Focal Hepatic Lesions: A Multicenter, Multireader Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic computed tomography (CT) and gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for characterization of hepatic lesions by using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in a multicenter, off-site evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, we evaluated 231 hepatic lesions (114 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCCs], 58 non-HCC malignancies, and 59 benign lesions) confirmed histologically in 217 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent both gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and dynamic CT at one of five tertiary hospitals. Four radiologists at different institutes independently reviewed all MR images first and the CT images 4 weeks later. They evaluated the major and ancillary imaging features and categorized each hepatic lesion according to the LI-RADS v2014. Diagnostic performance was calculated and compared using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

MRI showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than CT for diagnosing hepatic malignancies; the pooled sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies for categorizing LR-5/5V/M were 59.0% vs. 72.4% (CT vs. MRI; p < 0.001), 83.5% vs. 83.9% (p = 0.906), and 65.3% vs. 75.3% (p < 0.001), respectively. CT and MRI showed comparable capabilities for differentiating between HCC and other malignancies, with pooled accuracies of 79.9% and 82.4% for categorizing LR-M, respectively (p = 0.139).

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetate-enhanced MRI showed superior accuracy for categorizing LR-5/5V/M in hepatic malignancies in comparison with dynamic CT. Both modalities had comparable accuracies for distinguishing other malignancies from HCC.

Emerging Role of Hepatobiliary Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Emphasis on Recent Updates in Major Guidelines

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be noninvasively diagnosed on the basis of its characteristic imaging findings of arterial phase enhancement and portal/delayed “washout” on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cirrhotic patients. However, different specific diagnostic criteria have been proposed by several countries and major academic societies. In 2018, major guideline updates were proposed by the Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) of Korea. In addition to dynamic CT and MRI using extracellular contrast media, these new guidelines now include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using hepatobiliary contrast media as the first-line diagnostic test, while the KLCA-NCC and EASL guidelines also include contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as the second-line diagnostic test. Therefore, hepatobiliary MR contrast media and CEUS will be increasingly used for the noninvasive diagnosis and staging of HCC. In this review, we discuss the emerging role of hepatobiliary phase MRI and CEUS for the diagnosis of HCC and also review the changes in the HCC diagnostic criteria in major guidelines, including the KLCA-NCC practice guidelines version 2018. In addition, we aimed to pay particular attention to some remaining issues in the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC.

Understanding the Role of Gadoxetic Acid in MRI

Background:

Radiological imaging methods used at a large scale in the assessment of hepatic lesions include: Ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. To further characterize these lesions, specific contrast agents may be added, thus revealing the vascularity of the lesions.

Discussion:

This review focuses on gadoxetic acid, which is a hepatospecific contrast agent used in MRI. The aim of the review is to briefly explain the mechanism of GA enhancement, describe the enhancement patterns of some benign and malignant hepatic lesions and discuss possible advantages of GA over standard contrast agents.

Conclusion:

The role of GA in functional MR cholangiography and the idea of accessing liver function by measuring parenchymal enhancement will also be explained.

Comparison of extracellular and hepatobiliary MR contrast agents for the diagnosis of small HCCs

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to use a head-to-head nodule comparison to compare the performance of extracellular contrast agent MRI (ECA-MRI) with that of hepatobiliary contrast agent MRI (HBA-MRI) for the non-invasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

METHODS

Between August 2014 and October 2017, 171 patients with cirrhosis, each with 1 to 3 nodules measuring 1-3 cm, were enrolled across 8 centers. All patients underwent both an ECA-MRI and an HBA-MRI within a month. A non-invasive diagnosis of HCC was made when a nodule exhibited arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) with washout at the portal venous phase (PVP) and/or delayed phase (DP) for ECA-MRI, or the PVP and/or HB phase (HBP) for HBA-MRI. The gold standard was defined by using a previously published composite algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 225 nodules, of which 153 were HCCs and 72 were not, were included. The sensitivites of both MRI techniques were similar. Specificity was 83.3% (95% CI 72.7-91.1) for ECA-MRI and 68.1% (95% CI 56.0-78.6) for HBA-MRI. In terms of HCC diagnosis on ECA-MRI, 138 nodules had APHE, 84 had washout at PVP, and 104 at DP; on HBA-MRI, 128 nodules had APHE, 71 had washout at PVP, and 99 at HBP. For nodules 2-3 cm in size, sensitivity and specificity were similar between the 2 approaches. For nodules 1-2 cm in size, specificity dropped to 66.1% (95% CI 52.2-78.2) for HBA-MRI vs. 85.7% (95% CI 73.8-93.6) for ECA-MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

HBA-MRI specificity is lower than that of ECA-MRI for diagnosing small HCCs in patients with cirrhosis. These results raise the question of the proper use of HBA-MRI in algorithms for the non-invasive diagnosis of small HCCs.

LAY SUMMARY

There are 2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based approaches available for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), using either extracellular or hepatobiliary contrast agents. The current results showed that the sensitivity of MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents was similar to that with extracellular contrast agents, but the specificity was lower. Thus, hepatobiliary contrast agent-based MRI, although detailed in international guidelines, should be used with caution for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT00848952.

Comparison of diagnostic performance of non-contrast MRI and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid in initially diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a simulation study of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted in order to compare the diagnostic performance of noncontrast and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in initially diagnosed HCC patients.

METHODS

We identified 140 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed HCC (173 HCCs) within the Milan criteria, who underwent liver MRI using gadoxetic acid between 2015 and 2016. One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients without HCC who underwent liver MRI in the same period for HCC surveillance were enrolled for the control group. Two radiologists independently reviewed two MRI sets: a noncontrast set and an abbreviated set. The noncontrast set consists of T2 FSE/ssFSE, T1 in- and out-of-phase image, DWI, and the ADC map. The abbreviated set consists of T2 FSE/ssFSE, hepatobiliary phase image 20 min after gadoxetic acid injection, DWI, and the ADC map.

RESULTS

In a per-patient analysis, sensitivity of reviewer 1 for noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 85.7 and 90.0%, respectively. The specificity for both noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 92.7%. For reviewer 2, sensitivity of noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 86.4 and 89.3%, respectively. Per-patient specificity of reviewer 2 was 92.7% for both noncontrast and abbreviated sets. The sensitivity and specificity of two image sets were not significantly different for both reviewers. The per-tumor sensitivity of noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 81.5 and 84.4% for reviewer 1, respectively, and 79.8 and 84.4% for reviewer 2, respectively. There was no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Noncontrast and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid showed comparable diagnostic performance for detecting patients with HCCs in the early stage.

KEY POINTS

• Diagnostic performance of noncontrast MRI and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid for detecting HCCs is comparable in patients with HCCs in the early stage. • Noncontrast MRI and abbreviated MRI showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting HCCs in the early stage. • Outcomes of surveillance for HCC in high-risk patients can be improved by adopting these simplified and focused MRI protocols.

Relationship between platelet-based models and the prognosis of patients with malignant hepatic tumors

Platelets (PLTs) are involved in tumor growth, metabolism and vascular activation. PLT-based models have been reported to have significant value on the recurrence of malignant hepatic tumors. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of PLT count and 18 PLT-based models on the prognosis of patients with malignant hepatic tumors. The clinical data from 189 patients with malignant hepatic tumors were retrospectively analyzed and used to calculate the scores of the 18 PLT-based models. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the suitable cut-off values of mortality and recurrence in patients with malignant hepatic tumors. The overall survival and cumulative recurrence rates of patients were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the difference was analyzed using log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors of recurrence-free survival and overall survival. In the present study, 11 models were considered as predictors of mortality (P<0.05) and six models were considered as predictors of recurrence (P<0.05). The results from multivariate analysis demonstrated that vascular cancer embolus, uric acid >231 µmol/l, hemoglobin >144 g/l and the Lok index model >0.695 were considered as independent risk factors of mortality (P<0.05). Furthermore, vascular cancer embolus, PLT to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) >175 and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) >4.82 were independent factors of recurrence (P<0.05). In addition, the results from this study indicated that the Lok-index could be considered as a predictor of the overall survival rate. In conclusion, the FIB-4 and PLR model may be valuable for predicting the recurrence-free rate of patients with malignant hepatic tumors.

Identification of Arterial Hyperenhancement in CT and MRI in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Unenhanced Images

Objective

According to the current guidelines, arterial hyperenhancement for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is determined using the arterial phase only. We investigated the optimal definition of arterial hyperenhancement in patients with HCC using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and Methods

The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study. The requirement for informed consent was waived. Between January 2011 and September 2013, 147 consecutive patients with surgically proven HCCs with both pre-operative CT and MRI were included. Identification rates of arterial hyperenhancement on CT and magnetic resonance (MR) images using arterial phase only, dual phase (unenhanced and arterial phases), and also subtraction MR images were assessed qualitatively.

Results

The identification rates for arterial hyperenhancement on CT were significantly different between arterial phase and dual phase (72.8% vs. 90.5%; p < 0.001), whereas the rates were similar on MRI (91.8% vs. 93.9%; p = 0.257). The identification rate of arterial hyperenhancement in MRI increased to 98.6% using subtraction MR images.

Conclusion

Visual comparison of arterial and unenhanced phases could be recommended instead of conventional qualitative arterial phase alone assessment to determine arterial hyperenhancement of HCCs, especially when using CT.

Optimal lexicon of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma modified from LI-RADS

PURPOSE

To define the optimal lexicon of major imaging findings on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs to diagnose HCC to improve diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-one hepatic lesions (149 HCC, six other malignancies, 86 benign lesions) in 177 treatment-naïve patients at risk of HCC who underwent gadoxetic acid-MRIs from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed using either histopathological or follow-up imaging findings as a standard reference. Two board-certified radiologists independently evaluated the imaging features and categorized the nodules based on the original and the following modified definitions in LI-RADS: (1) washout appearance in the portal venous phase (PVP) only versus that in the PVP or transitional phase, and (2) enhancing capsule only versus enhancing or non-enhancing capsule. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement of LR-5 were assessed and compared between the algorithms using generalized estimation equation.

RESULTS

The sensitivity [79.2% (95% confidence interval 71.9, 85.0)] and accuracy [84.6% (79.5, 88.7)] of LR-5 were significantly higher for modified lexicon compared with original LI-RADS [60.4% (52.3, 67.9) and 73.9% (67.9, 79.0); P < 0.001 in all cases]. There was no significant difference in specificity [93.5% (86.2, 97.0) and 95.7% (89.0, 98.4); P = 0.153]. Subgroups of lesions < or ≥ 2 cm showed similar tendencies. Inter-observer agreement for capsule appearance was fair to moderate, whereas that for other imaging findings was good to excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to original LI-RADS, LI-RADS with modified lexicon showed higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC using gadoxetic acid-MRI, with similar specificity.

The Optimal Management for Sub-Centimeter Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Curative Treatments or Follow-Up?

Background

The optimal strategy for dealing with sub-centimeter hepatic nodules has not yet been established. This study aimed to assess whether there was a need to provide curative treatments for sub-centimeter hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) to patients at risk for high false positives.

Material/Methods

We identified patients with primary pathologically diagnosed HCC ≤2 cm from 2004 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. They were divided according to the interventions they received: local ablation, surgical resection, or liver transplantation. In each group, overall survival and cancer-specific survival were used as endpoints to compare the prognoses between patients with sub-centimeter HCC and patients with HCC measuring 1 to 2 cm by Kaplan-Meier. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias. We also compared the survival of patients with a primary solitary HCC based on interventions, in the different tumor size groups. Bootstrapping was performed to validate the findings.

Results

Overall, 10.4% of patients (197 out of 1894) had HCCs <1 cm, and 89.6% of patients (1697 out of 1894) had HCCs in the 1 to 2 cm range. There was no significant difference in overall and cancer-specific survival between patients with HCCs <1 cm and those with HCCs in the 1 to 2 cm range, in all treatment groups. After adjusting confounding factors, no significant correlation was found between tumor size and survival time. In patients with HCCs measuring ≤2 cm, overall survival and cancer-specific survival were superior in liver transplantation compared with surgical resection and local ablation. Surgical resection provided better survival than local ablation.

Conclusions

Compared to patients with HCCs measuring 1 to 2 cm, the survival rates of patients with sub-centimeter HCCs was not improved through curative treatments, risking high false positives.

Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of hypervascular hyperplastic nodule from small (<3 cm) hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis: A retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Hypervascular hyperplastic nodules (HHNs) occasionally develop in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis (ALC) and show arterial enhancement, thus mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Importantly, HHN as a benign lesion should be distinguished from HCC.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in distinguishing HHN from small (<3 cm) hypervascular HCC (hHCC) in patients with ALC.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective case-control study.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T/in- and out-of-phase, T₁ -weighted, T₂ -weighted, diffusion-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, and dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced images.

POPULATION

Among 560 patients with ALC who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI and DWI, 12 patients with 28 HHNs and 22 patients with 29 hHCCs smaller than 3 cm were included.

ASSESSMENT

The following MRI features were evaluated by three independent radiologists: signal intensity (SI) on T₁ -weighted, T₂ -weighted, diffusion-weighted, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images; shape, homogeneity, and margin on HBP; diffusion restriction; intralesional fat; necrosis; hemorrhage; washout on portal venous phase (PVP) and/or transitional phase (TP); and capsular enhancement. Quantitative analysis was also conducted.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the significant MRI findings, and their diagnostic performance for the prediction of HHN was analyzed.

RESULTS

Lesion size of ≤16 mm (odds ratio [OR], 24.41; P = 0.007), low-to-iso SI on DWI (OR, 26.92; P = 0.007), and absence of washout on PVP and/or TP (OR, 31.84; P = 0.009) were significant independent factors for predicting HHN. When all three criteria were satisfied, the specificity was 100%. Compared with hHCCs, HHNs showed significantly smaller size (mean, 13.8 mm vs. 19.9 mm; P < 0.001) and higher mean SI value (994.0 vs. 669.5) and lesion-to-liver SI ratio (1.045 vs. 0.806) on HBP (P < 0.001, respectively).

DATA CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-MRI and DWI may be helpful in differentiating HHN from small hHCC in patients with ALC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:70-80.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis and Prognosis

As opposed to most solid cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) does not necessarily require histological confirmation. Noninvasive diagnosis is possible and relies on imaging. In cirrhotic patients, the diagnosis can be obtained in tumors displaying typical features that include non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by washout during the portal venous and/or delayed phases on CT or MR imaging. This pattern is very specific and, as such, has been endorsed by both Western and Asian diagnostic guidelines and systems. However, its sensitivity is not very high, especially for small lesions. Numerous ancillary features favoring the diagnosis of HCC may be depicted, including appearance after injection of hepatobiliary MR imaging contrast agents. These features increase confidence in diagnosis, but cannot be used as substitutes to liver biopsy. Aside from its diagnostic purpose, imaging also helps to assess tumor biology and patient outcome, by identifying features of local invasiveness. The purpose of this review article is to offer an overview of the role of imaging for the diagnosis and prognostication of HCC.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinoma: where do we stand?

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) represents a significant breakthrough in ultrasonography (US), and it is being increasingly used for the evaluation of focal liver lesions (FLLs). CEUS is unique in that it allows non-invasive assessment of liver perfusion in real time throughout the vascular phase, which has led to dramatic improvements in the diagnostic accuracy of US in the detection and characterization of FLLs, the choice of therapeutic procedures, and the evaluation of response. Currently, CEUS is included as a part of the suggested diagnostic work-up of FLLs, including in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, resulting in better patient management and cost-effective delivery of therapy.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Hepatocellular carcinoma and mimickers

Gadoxetic acid, a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent, has emerged as an important tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is useful for the evaluation of early-stage HCC, diagnosis of HCC precursor lesions, and highly sensitive diagnosis of HCC. Furthermore, functional information provided by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can aid in the characterization of focal liver lesions. For example, whereas lesions lack functioning hepatocytes appear hypointense in the hepatobiliary phase, preserved or enhanced expression of organic anion transporting polypeptides in some HCCs as well as focal nodular hyperplasia lead to hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase; and a targetoid appearance on transitional phase or hepatobiliary phase imaging can be helpful for identifying the histopathological composition of tumors. While gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may improve the sensitivity of HCC diagnosis and provide new insights into the characterization of focal liver lesions, there are many challenges associated with its use. This article reviews the pros and cons of HCC diagnosis with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and discuss some clues in the radiological differentiation of HCC from HCC mimickers.

Retrospective validation of a new diagnostic criterion for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: can hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase be used as an alternative to washout with the aid of ancillary features?

OBJECTIVES

To validate new diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) using hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) as an alternative to washout in combination with ancillary features.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 288 patients at high risk for HCC with 387 nodules (HCCs, n=292; non-HCCs, n=95) showing arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) ≥1 cm on Gd-EOB-MRI. Imaging diagnoses of HCCs were made using different criteria: APHE plus hypointensity on the portal venous phase (PVP) (criterion 1), APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or transitional phase (TP) (criterion 2), APHE plus hypointensity on the PVP and/or TP and/or HBP (criterion 3), and criterion 3 plus non-LR-1/2/M according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 considering ancillary features (criterion 4). Sensitivities and specificities of those criteria were compared using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Among diagnostic criteria for HCCs, criteria 3 and 4 showed significantly higher sensitivities (93.8% and 92.5%, respectively) than criteria 1 and 2 (70.9% and 86.6%, respectively) (p values <0.001). The specificity of criterion 4 (87.4%) was shown to be significantly higher than that of criterion 3 (48.4%, p<0.001), albeit comparable to criterion 2 (86.3%, p>0.999) and significantly lower than criterion 1 (97.9%, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In the non-invasive diagnosis of HCCs on Gd-EOB-MRI, HBP hypointensity may be used as an alternative to washout enabling a highly sensitive diagnosis with little loss in specificity if it is used after excluding nodules considered to be benignities or non-HCC malignancies based on characteristic imaging features.

KEY POINTS

• Gd-EOB-MRI enhancement and ancillary features can be used to diagnose HCC. • Exclusion of LR-1/2/M improves specificity when HBP hypointensity is used.

Pitfalls and problems to be solved in the diagnostic CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)

The 2017 Core of the computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) provides clear definitions and concise explanations of the CT/MRI diagnostic algorithm. Nevertheless, there remain some practical and controversial issues that radiologists should be aware of when using the system. This article discusses pitfalls and problems which may be encountered when the version 2017 diagnostic algorithm is used for CT and MRI. The pitfalls include challenges in applying major features and assigning the LR-M category, as well as categorisation discrepancy between CT and MRI. The problems include imprecision of category codes, application of ancillary features, and regional practice variations in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Potential solutions are presented along with these pitfalls and problems. KEY POINTS: • Although the diagnostic algorithm provides clear and detailed explanations, major feature evaluation can be subject to pitfalls and differentiation of HCC and non-HCC malignancy remains challenging. • Ancillary features are optional and equally weighted. However, features such as hepatobiliary phase hypointensity and restricted diffusion have greater impact on HCC diagnosis than other ancillary features and may merit greater emphasis or weighting. • LI-RADS was initially developed from a Western paradigm, which may limit its applicability in the East due to regional practice variations. In Eastern Asia, high sensitivity is prioritised over near-perfect specificity for HCC diagnosis in order to detect tumours at early stages.

Optimal criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis using CT in patients undergoing liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of various guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis using computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

In total, 216 patients who underwent preoperative CT and subsequent LT were included. Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated focal hepatic lesions independently according to various guidelines and allocated patients according to the Milan criteria. The diagnostic performance of the guidelines was compared using alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristics (AFROC) analysis with bootstrapping. Comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of patient allocation based on the Milan criteria between guidelines were performed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE).

RESULTS

Fifty-two of 216 patients had 87 HCCs. The reader-averaged figure of merit obtained using AFROC analysis was 0.738 for the AASLD/EASL or KLCSG-NCC guidelines and 0.728 for the LI-RADS v2014 or OPTN/UNOS (bootstrapping, p = 0.005). The per-lesion sensitivity for HCCs (all and 1-2-cm lesions) was significantly higher with the AASLD/EASL (37.9-41.4% and 30.8-41.0%) than with LI-RADS (28.7% and 15.4-18.0%) (logistic regression with GEE, p = 0.008 and 0.030 for reader 1 and p = 0.005 for reader 2). The per-patient specificity (98.8-99.4%) was the same for all guidelines. The accuracy of the Milan criteria was 81.5-83.3% without significant differences among the four guidelines (logistic regression with GEE, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

AASLD/EASL showed higher diagnostic performance and sensitivity, particularly for 1-2-cm HCCs, and the same specificity with LI-RADS. All guidelines are comparable for patient allocation based on the Milan criteria for LT.

KEY POINTS

• The overall diagnostic performance of CT for HCC diagnosis was highest with AASLD/EASL. • AASLD/EASL showed higher sensitivity for diagnosis of 1-2-cm HCCs than LI-RADS. • The accuracy of the Milan criteria using CT was comparable among the four guidelines.

Percutaneous US/MRI Fusion-guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Subcentimeter Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Technical Feasibility and Therapeutic Outcomes

Purpose To evaluate the technical feasibility and therapeutic outcomes of percutaneous US/MRI fusion-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of recurrent subcentimeter-sized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, between January 2012 and December 2014 a total of 194 planning US examinations were performed in 186 patients (159 men and 27 women; mean age, 61.1 years ± 10.0 [standard deviation]) for newly developed subcentimeter recurrent HCCs. These recurrent HCCs were defined as hypervascular nodules (>5.5 mm and <10 mm) with typical MRI findings of HCC. The study assessed how often US/MRI fusion-guided percutaneous RFA was deemed technically feasible at planning US examination (the feasibility rate) and the therapeutic outcomes after RFA, including the rates of technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), and major complications. Cumulative LTP rates were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The feasibility rate of percutaneous RFA at planning US examination was 65.7% (138 of 210 HCCs). The most common reason for RFA infeasibility was that an index tumor was inconspicuous at US. Among 138 subcentimeter HCCs feasible for RFA, 125 lesions underwent percutaneous RFA. The rates of both technical success and technique efficacy were 98.4% (123 of 125). The cumulative LTP rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 3.6%, 5.4%, and 7.4%, respectively. The major complication rate was 2.5% (three of 119). Conclusion Percutaneous US/MRI fusion-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was feasible in approximately two-thirds of subcentimeter recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Percutaneous US/MRI fusion-guided RFA is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with subcentimeter recurrent HCCs.

Noninvasive imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: From diagnosis to prognosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and a major public health problem worldwide. Hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex multistep process at molecular, cellular, and histologic levels with key alterations that can be revealed by noninvasive imaging modalities. Therefore, imaging techniques play pivotal roles in the detection, characterization, staging, surveillance, and prognosis evaluation of HCC. Currently, ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality for screening and surveillance purposes. While based on conclusive enhancement patterns comprising arterial phase hyperenhancement and portal venous and/or delayed phase wash-out, contrast enhanced dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the diagnostic tools for HCC without requirements for histopathologic confirmation. Functional MRI techniques, including diffusion-weighted imaging, MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents, perfusion imaging, and magnetic resonance elastography, show promise in providing further important information regarding tumor biological behaviors. In addition, evaluation of tumor imaging characteristics, including nodule size, margin, number, vascular invasion, and growth patterns, allows preoperative prediction of tumor microvascular invasion and patient prognosis. Therefore, the aim of this article is to review the current state-of-the-art and recent advances in the comprehensive noninvasive imaging evaluation of HCC. We also provide the basic key concepts of HCC development and an overview of the current practice guidelines.

The Diagnostic Performance of Liver MRI without Intravenous Contrast for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case-Controlled Feasibility Study

Objective

To preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic performance of an unenhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a case-control study design.

Materials and Methods

The case group consisted of 175 patients with initially-diagnosed HCC, who underwent a 3T liver MRI. A total of 237 HCCs were identified. The number of HCCs that were smaller than 1 cm, 1 cm ≤ and < 2 cm, and ≥ 2 cm were 19, 105, and 113, respectively. For the control group, 72 patients with chronic liver disease, who did not have HCC, were enrolled. Two radiologists independently reviewed the T2 half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo, T2 fast spin echos with fat saturation, T1 gradient in- and out-of-phase images, and diffusion-weighted images/apparent diffusion coefficient maps to detect HCC. Per-patient analyses were performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the non-contrast MRI for diagnosing HCC. Furthermore, the per-lesion sensitivity was also calculated according to tumor size.

Results

In the per-patient analyses, the sensitivity and specificity of reader 1 were 86.3% (151/175) and 87.5% (63/72), respectively; while those of reader 2 were 82.9% (145/175) and 76.4% (55/72), respectively. When excluding HCCs smaller than 1 cm, the sensitivity of reader 1 and 2 were 88.0% (147/167) and 86.2% (144/167), respectively. In the per-lesion analyses, the sensitivities of reader 1 and reader 2 were 75.9% (180/237) and 70.5% (167/237), respectively.

Conclusion

The per-patient sensitivity and specificity of non-contrast MRIs were within a reasonable range for the initial diagnosis of HCC. Non-contrast MRIs may have a potential for surveillance of HCC. Further confirmatory diagnostic test accuracy studies are needed.

Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the LI-RADS (v2014) on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI prospectively applied in actual practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively written radiology reports of 143 treatment-naïve at-risk patients who underwent gadoxetate-enhanced liver MRI from January to December 2014, and identified 202 hepatic observations categorized using the LI-RADS. The diagnostic performances of LI-RADS categories for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic malignancy were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty (69.0 %) of 29 LR-4, 73 (97.3 %) of 75 LR-5, and all of five (100 %) LR-5V observations were HCCs. The remaining two (2.7 %) LR-5 observations were combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, while 10 (76.9 %) of 13 LR-M observations were HCCs. The sensitivity and specificity of LR-5/5V for HCC were 60.5 % and 97.3 %, respectively. Including LR-M in the diagnostic criteria for HCC increased sensitivity (68.2 %, p = 0.002) but decreased specificity without statistical significance (93.2 %, p = 0.154). LR-5/5V/M yielded sensitivity of 68.9 % and specificity of 100.0 % for hepatic malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

LI-RADS v2014 was successfully applied on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI in clinical practice. LR-5/5V was the most specific diagnostic measure for HCC, but most LR-M observations were HCCs and a considerable portion of non-HCC malignancies were categorized as LR-4 or LR-5.

KEY POINTS

• LR-5/5V provided a highly specific diagnosis for HCC. • Half of non-HCC malignancies were categorized as LR-4 or LR-5. • The majority of LR-M observations were finally diagnosed as HCCs. • More sensitive diagnosis of HCC was feasible with LR-5/5V/M on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI. • Observations in either LR-5/5V or LR-M categories were definitely malignant.