Comparison of the Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with a Large Solitary or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinomas

Therapeutic analysis of 632 cases treated by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to analyze the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 632 patients with HCC at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging (BCLC) System stages 0, A, and B from Beijing You'an Hospital affiliated with Capital Medical University. The primary outcomes analyzed were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary outcomes included one-, three-, and five-year OS rates among different groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period for 632 cases identified with HCC was 52.1 months (range: 3-162 months), while 127 patients died during follow-up. The one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 97.1 %, 89.5 %, and 80.4 %, respectively. Moreover, the one-, three-, and five-year PFS rates were 58.1 %, 29.3 %, and 19.8 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the BCLC stages and complete ablation were independent predictors of OS and PFS (all p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in OS rate among TACE-RFA, TACE-MWA, and TACE-CA groups, but TACE-CA showed better efficacy in improving the PFS rate (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TACE and ablation is effective in early-stage HCC and BCLC stage B. Complete ablation and BCLC stages are significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to validate these findings.

Transarterial chemoembolization with insertion of radioactive seeds for hepatocellular carcinoma

Introduction

For patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not eligible for surgical tumor resection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is commonly employed as a therapeutic strategy. After TACE is complete, a variety of other therapeutic approaches can be employed to improve patient overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Aim

This study was developed with the goal of comparing the relative clinical efficacy and long-term outcomes observed in HCC patients who underwent combination TACE and radioactive seed insertion (RSI) treatment to those of patients who only underwent TACE treatment.

Material and methods

This retrospective analysis included a total of 80 patients with HCC who underwent treatment via TACE with (n = 39) or without (n = 41) RSI. Treatment responses and long-term outcomes in these two groups were compared with one another.

Results

The baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. None of the patients experienced adverse complications related to treatment. Individuals in the combination treatment group experienced complete response (59.0% vs. 22.0%, p = 0.001) and total response (92.3% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.001) rates that were significantly better than those of patients that underwent TACE alone. Combination treatment was also associated with significant prolongation of patient PFS (13 vs. 7 months, p = 0.019) and OS (23 vs. 15 months, p = 0.005), with Cox regression analyses identifying combination treatment as a predictor of prolonged PFS and OS.

Conclusions

These data suggest that a combination of TACE and RSI can contribute to significant improvements in HCC patient therapeutic response rates, OS, and PFS relative to TACE alone.

Long-term partial response in a patient with liver metastasis of primary adrenocortical carcinoma with adjuvant mitotane plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation: a case report

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, heterogeneous, and aggressive malignancy with a generally poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the optimal treatment plan. After surgery, both mitotane treatment or the etoposide-doxorubicin-cisplatin (EDP) protocol plus mitotane chemotherapy have a certain effect, but there is still an extremely high possibility of recurrence and metastasis. The liver is one of the most common metastatic targets. Therefore, techniques such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for liver tumors can be attempted in a specific group of patients. We present the case of a 44-year-old female patient with primary ACC, who was diagnosed with liver metastasis 6 years after resection. During mitotane treatment, we performed four courses of TACE and two MWA procedures in accordance with her clinical condition. The patient has maintained the partial response status and has currently returned to normal life to date. This case illustrates the value of the practical application of mitotane plus TACE and MWA treatment.

Percutaneous thermal ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and survival

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and survival of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) -related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

A total of 83 HCV-related HCC patients who were treated with percutaneous thermal ablation combined with TACE were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic and clinical data were collected. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess independent risk factors of OS and RFS.

Results

92.8% patients (77/83) and 96.6% (170/176) tumor lesions achieved complete response (CR) 1 month after all treatment, and 10.8% (9/83) patients had minor complications. The median OS was 60 months (95% confidence interval (CI)= 48.0-72.0), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, 5- and 10-year cumulative OS rates were 94%, 78.3%, 72.3%, 43.4% and 27.5%, respectively. The cumulative RFS rates at 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year were 74.7%, 49.3%, 30.7% and 25.3%, respectively. Sex (HR =0.529, P=0.048), ablation result (HR=5.824, P=0.000) and Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score (HR=2.725, P=0.011) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (HR =2.360, P = 0.005) and tumor number(HR=2.786, P=0.000) were independent prognostic factors for RFS.

Conclusions

Percutaneous thermal ablation combined with TACE is a safe and effective treatment for HCV-related HCC. Sex, ablation result and ALBI are significant prognostic factors for OS. AFP and tumor number are significant prognostic factors for RFS.

I-125 seeds insertion with TACE for advanced HCC: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of I-125 seeds (IS) insertion with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An extensive search was conducted for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the establishment date of each database to November 2020.

RESULTS

A total of nine RCTs were included in this study. Our analysis showed no significant changes in the pooled Δalpha-fetoprotein values (p = .06), incident rates of myelosuppression (p = .46), vomit occurrence (p = .27), and abnormal liver function (p = .42) between the two treatment groups. However, the complete response (p < .00001), total response (p < .00001), and disease control (p < .00001) rates were significantly higher in patients who underwent TACE with IS insertion, as opposed to patients who received TACE alone. Furthermore, patients who underwent TACE with IS insertion experienced markedly longer pooled overall survival (OS) time (p < .0001), with better OS rates at the six-month (p = .0002), one-year (p < .0001), and three-year (p = .0003) follow-ups than patients who received TACE alone.

CONCLUSION

TACE with IS insertion can significantly improve clinical response and prolong the survival of advanced HCC patients.

Benefits of step-by-step debulking microwave ablation for huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of step-by-step debulking Microwave Ablation (MWA) with Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) monotherapy for huge (≥10 cm in diameter) unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE refractoriness.

METHODS

This is a multi-center retrospective study carried out on 599 patients with huge unresectable HCC who received TACE as first-line therapy at five hospitals from January 2009 to December 2018. A total of 103 patients with TACE refractoriness were divided into two cohorts: monthly step-by-step debulking MWA (n = 52) or continued TACE (n = 51). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after refractory TACE were evaluated. Residual liver and tumor volume were recorded for the MWA group.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 24.3 months and median OS and PFS were significantly longer in the MWA group than in the TACE group (OS 21.0 vs. 11.7 months, PFS 6.1 vs. 3.0 months, both p < 0.001). The one-, two-, and three-year OS rates in the MWA and TACE groups were 73.1%, 46.6%, and 37.2% versus 43.1%, 15.5%, and 2.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the 0.5-, 1-, and 2-year PFS rates in the MWA and TACE groups were 51.9%, 36.5%, and 25.0% versus 27.5%, 11.8%, and 0, respectively. Multivariate analyses confirmed that switching to debulking MWA treatment was an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS. In the MWA group, the average additions of residual liver volume/total liver volume were 7.7% ± 6.7%, 7.2% ± 10.2%, and 10.1% ± 8.8% after the first, second, and third MWA procedure.

CONCLUSION

Step-by-step debulking MWA can significantly improve long-term OS and PFS in patients with huge unresectable HCCs compared with repeated TACE after TACE refractoriness. Key PointThe debulking MWA therapy provides significantly longer OS and PFS than continued TACE for patients with huge unresectable HCCs after TACE-refractory, especially with complete tumor ablation.The most common complications were fever (48.1%) and pain (46.2%) in the MWA group. Two major complications (abdominal infection) were recorded in the MWA group, which recovered after symptomatic treatment.During the course of repeated MWAs, liver hyperplasia appeared mainly after the second MWA procedure and the average maximum increased RLV/TLV rate was 16.3%±12.7%.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Microwave Ablation and TACE Combined with Cryoablation in the Treatment of Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with microwave ablation (MWA) and TACE combined with cryoablation (CRA) in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 81 patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (tumor diameter 5～8 cm cm) who received TACE combined with ablation in our hospital from February 2015 to February 2019. The study patients were divided into TACE combined with MWA group (T-MWA, n = 41) and TACE combined with CRA group (T-CRA, n = 40) according to the treatment plan. Overall survival (OS) and progress free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups, and complications were observed. Survival curves for OS and PFS were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in overall survival were compared using the log-rank test.

Results

There was no statistical difference in general conditions between the two groups of patients. The results showed that 30 (73.2%) patients in T-MWA group achieved objective response (OR) and 39 (95.1%) patients achieved disease control (DC), compared with 24 (60.0%) patients in T-CRA group who achieved objective response (OR) and 37 (92.5%) patients who achieved disease control (DC). The median OS was 19.2 months in the T-MWA group and 18.6 months in the T-CRA group (P=0.64). The median PFS was 9.3 months in the T-MWA group and 12.3 months in the T-CRA group (P=0.6). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), intrahepatic tumor diameter, and the number of tumor lesions were common prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In terms of surgery-related complications and adverse reactions, abdominal pain and gastrointestinal reactions were observed in 13 (31.7%) and 11(26.8%) cases in the T-MWA group, while we observed 4 (10.0%) and 2 (5.0%) cases in the T-CRA group, respectively. The difference between the two was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

TACE combined with MWA and TACE combined with CRA were equally effective in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma. TACE-CRA can effectively reduce the incidence of abdominal pain and gastrointestinal reactions in patients. However, compared with TACE-MWA, TACE-CRA is more likely to cause thrombocytopenia.

Single medium-sized hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sequential conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation at 4 weeks versus cTACE alone: a propensity score

Background

Microwave ablation (MWA) is a potentially curative treatment for unresectable patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 3 cm, while its therapeutic efficacy decreases significantly for HCC > 3cm. Previous studies have demonstrated that conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) combined with MWA (cTACE-MWA) may improve local tumor control rate and reduce the recurrence rate for HCC > 3cm. However, there have been few study designs to analyze the clinical efficacy of cTACE-MWA for medium-sized HCC (3–5cm). Therefore, this study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cTACE-MWA with cTACE alone for a single medium-sized HCC of 3–5 cm in diameter.

Methods

We retrospectively investigate the data of 90 patients with a single medium-sized HCC who were referred to our hospital and underwent cTACE-MWA or cTACE alone from December 2017 to March 2020. Then, patients were identified with propensity score-matched (1:1). The local tumor response to treatment and time to progression (TTP) were compared using mRECIST criteria between the cTACE-MWA group and the cTACE group.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included after matching (cTACE-MWA: 21; cTACE: 21). Comparing with cTACE, cTACE-MWA demonstrate significantly better local tumor control (ORR: 95.2% vs 61.9%, p = 0.02; DCR: 95.2% vs 66.7%, p = 0.045) and TTP (median 19.8 months vs 6.8 months, p < 0.001). The 1- and 2-year cumulative probabilities of OS were 100% and 95% in the cTACE-MWA group, which were significantly higher than those in the cTACE group (95% and 76%) (p = 0.032). Multivariate Cox regression analysis illustrates that cTACE-MWA was associated with better TTP (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.76; p = 0.012), but tumor size was associated with worse TTP (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.89; p = 0.045).

Conclusions

cTACE followed by MWA improved TTP and OS in patients with a single medium-sized HCC, and no major complication was observed in this study.

I-125 seeds brachytherapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

I-125 seeds brachytherapy (ISB) has been used to improve the clinical effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim to appraise the safety and clinical efficacy of combined ISB and TACE for the treatment of subcapsular HCC.

Materials and methods

A retrospective investigative study extending from January 2017 to December 2020, involved individuals suffering from subcapsular HCC, who were subjected to TACE treatment with or without ISB in our center. The clinical effectiveness was compared between 2 groups.

Results

Sixty-four patients, in total, with subcapsular HCC had to undergo TACE with (n = 32) or without (n = 32) ISB in our center. After CT-guided ISB, only 2 (6.3%) patients experienced a self-limited pneumothorax. Combined treatment resulted in a significantly higher complete response (56.3% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.002) and total response (90.7% vs. 59.4%, P = 0.004) rates than that of TACE alone. In comparison to the TACE alone group, the median progression-free survival was substantially longer in the combined treatment group (11 months vs. 5 months, P = 0.016). Further, 15 and 28 patients in combined and TACE alone groups respectively died within the follow-up. The median OS was comparable between combined and TACE alone groups (22 months vs. 18 months, P = 0.529).

Conclusions

Combined TACE and ISB therapy is a safe treatment method for individuals suffering from subcapsular HCC. When compared, combined treatment had significantly enhanced clinical efficacy as a subcapsular HCC therapy, in comparison to TACE alone.

Combined radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation with transarterial chemoembolization can increase efficiency in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma without more complication: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are widely used in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical practice. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with RFA or MWA versus TACE monotherapy for intermediate-stage HCC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control (LTC) rate, and major complication. Subgroup analysis for different TACE combination therapies was performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 1799 patients with intermediate-stage HCC were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS was in favor of TACE combination therapy (HR, 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.62). Specifically, the TACE combination therapy was associated with higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates. Regarding tumor progression, the TACE combination therapy showed significantly better PFS (HR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.37-0.61) and higher 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates than TACE monotherapy. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the LTC was also in favor of TACE combination therapy (OR, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.24-0.53). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the major complication rate (OR, 1.26, 95% CI, 0.74-2.16). These results were consistent across subgroups of TACE + RFA versus TACE and TACE + MWA versus TACE.

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with RFA or MWA can provide significantly better OS, PFS and LTC than TACE monotherapy for patients with intermediate-stage HCC, without increasing the risk of major complications.

Comparison of combined transarterial chemoembolization and ablations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy of three combination therapies, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CRA) for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Online databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies with 5468 pooled patients (TACE + RFA: 21 studies with 3398 patients, TACE + MWA:14 studies with 1477 patients, and TACE + CRA: 7 studies with 593 patients) reported combination therapy versus TACE alone. The TACE + MWA subcohort had the best odds of long-term overall survival (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.44, 16.08, P = 0.011) and objective response rate (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.34, 6.61, P < 0.001) compared with the other two combination subcohorts. The TACE + RFA and TACE + MWA subcohorts had approximately similar odds of 1-year recurrence-free survival (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13, 12.75, P < 0.001 and OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.70, 12.51, P = 0.003, respectively). The disease control rate was similar between the TACE + MWA and TACE + CRA subcohorts (OR 4.01, 95% CI 2.66, 6.04, P < 0.001 and OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.68, 9.74, P = 0.002) but greater than the TACE + RFA subcohort (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.14, 4.86, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the TACE + MWA subcohort had the best efficacy and outcomes, especially for younger patients (less than 60-year-old) with tumor size of ≤ 3 cm, compared with the TACE + RFA or TACE + CRA subcohorts.

Combined treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma: Time to put them in the guidelines?

The time for battling cancer has never been more suitable than nowadays and fortunately against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) we do have a far-reaching arsenal. Moreover, because liver cancer comprises a plethora of stages-from very early to advanced disease and with many treatment options–from surgery to immunotherapy trials–it leaves the clinician a wide range of options. The scope of our review is to throw light on combination treatments that seem to be beyond guidelines and to highlight these using evidence-based analysis of the most frequently used combination therapies, discussing their advantages and flaws in comparison to the current standard of care. One particular combination therapy seems to be in the forefront: Transarterial chemoembolization plus ablation for medium-size non-resectable HCC (3-5 cm), which is currently at the frontier between Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification A and B. Not only does it improve the outcome in contrast to each individual therapy, but it also seems to have similar results to surgery. Also, the abundance of immune checkpoint inhibitors that have appeared lately in clinical trials are bringing promising results against HCC. Although the path of combination therapies in HCC is still filled with uncertainty and caveats, in the following years the hepatology and oncology fields could witness an HCC guideline revolution.

Hyperthermia ablation combined with transarterial chemoembolization versus monotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The existing evidence has indicated that hyperthermia ablation (HA) and HA combined with transarterial chemoembolization (HATACE) are the optimal alternative to surgical resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the COVID-19 crisis. However, the evidence for decision-making is lacking in terms of comparison between HA and HATACE. Herein, a comprehensive evaluation was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of HATACE with monotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Worldwide studies were collected to evaluate the HATACE regimen for HCC due to the practical need for global extrapolation of applicative population. Meta-analyses were performed using the RevMan 5.3 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies involving a large sample of 5036 patients were included finally. Compared with HA alone, HATACE produced the advantage of 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (OR:1.90; 95%CI:1.46,2.46; p < 0.05) without increasing toxicity (p ≥ 0.05). Compared with TACE alone, HATACE was associated with superior 5-year OS rate (OR:3.54; 95%CI:1.96,6.37; p < 0.05) and significantly reduced the incidences of severe liver damage (OR:0.32; 95%CI:0.11,0.96; p < 0.05) and ascites (OR:0.42; 95%CI:0.20,0.88; p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis results of small (≤3 cm) HCC revealed that there were no significant differences between the HATACE group and HA monotherapy group in regard to the OS rates (p ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TACE alone, HATACE was more effective and safe for HCC. Compared with HA alone, HATACE was more effective for non-small-sized (>3 cm) HCC with comparable safety. However, the survival benefit of adjuvant TACE in HATACE regimen was not found for the patients with small (≤3 cm) HCC.

Chemoembolization Plus Microwave Ablation vs Chemoembolization Alone in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond the Milan Criteria: A Propensity Scoring Matching Study

Purpose

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended in patients with unresectable HCC beyond the Milan criteria (MC). However, the long-term efficacy of TACE remains unsatisfactory. Percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) is a curative therapy for early-stage HCC that provides better local tumor control than TACE; however, MWA is limited for large or multifocal lesions. We aimed to compare treatment efficacy and downstaging rate following combined TACE-MWA and TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC beyond the MC.

Patients and Methods

Patients with unresectable HCC beyond the MC who underwent either TACE-MWA (n=91) or TACE alone (n=140) at four medical institutions were included. Potential influencing factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were included in the Cox regression analysis. Propensity-score matching of patients treated with TACE-MWA and TACE alone was performed. Differences in OS and PFS were compared with the Log rank test. Patients who met the University of California, San Francisco criteria were eligible for assessment of the probability of downstaging within the MC. Downstaging rate was compared between the two groups.

Results

In multivariate analysis, treatment with TACE alone was an independent predictor of poor PFS (P=0.011) and OS (P<0.001). Both PFS (P=0.043) and OS (P=0.002) were significantly higher in patients treated with TACE-MWA than those treated with TACE alone. The downstaging rate was higher in patients treated with TACE-MWA than those treated with TACE alone (P=0.039).

Conclusion

Compared with TACE alone, TACE-MWA may offer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in HCC patients beyond the MC. Additionally, TACE-MWA may provide higher probability of downstaging within the MC than TACE alone, thereby increasing the possibility of liver transplantation.

Improvement in the condition of patients with primary liver cancer with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization before and after microwave ablation interventional therapy

BACKGROUND

We compared the clinical efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) and TACE alone for the treatment of patients with primary liver cancer (PLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 160 patients with PLC were enrolled and randomized into a study group (n=80) and a control group (n=80). Patients in the study group were treated with TACE combined with MWA, whereas those in the control group were treated with TACE alone. Treatment efficacy, changes in hepatic function indices after the treatment, incidence of adverse reactions, quality of life after treatment, and 3-year survival rates of the two groups were compared. Cox proportional hazards model was used for analyzing the patients' prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The total effective rate in the study group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Patients in the study group had lower alanine aminotransferase and total bilirubin levels (P<0.05) and higher albumin levels (P<0.05) than those in the control group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Cox proportional hazards model showed that tumor size, extrahepatic metastasis, portal vein tumor thrombosis, severity of liver cirrhosis, and therapeutic methods were independent risk factors for patients with PLC.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE combined with MWA is more effective than TACE alone in treating PLC, reducing the damage to the patients' cardiac function and prolonging survival.

Drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation therapy vs. microwave ablation alone for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary investigation of clinical value

Purpose

To assess the clinical value of drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) vs. MWA treatment alone for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

Consecutive data from 102 HCC patients at early stage who were referred to our hospital from December 2014 to May 2016 were retrospectively collected. Forty-seven patients underwent DEB-TACE combined with MWA treatment, whereas 55 patients underwent MWA alone. After 1 month of treatment, the tumour responses of the patients were assessed using the mRECIST criteria. Treatment-related complications and hepatic function were also analysed for the two groups. In addition, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and compared.

Results

Patients in the combined treatment group (DEB-TACE combined with MWA) presented a better objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) compared with those in the monotherapy group (MWA treatment). The median OS and PFS were longer in the combined treatment group compared with the monotherapy group. Multivariate Cox’s regression further illustrated that DEB-TACE + MWA vs. MWA was an independent protective factor for PFS and OS. No serious treatment-related complications were observed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

Combined treatment with DEB-TACE appeared to have advantages in prolonging OS and PFS compared to MWA. Therefore, combined treatment was efficient and should be strongly recommended to early stage HCC patients.

Utility of Real-time CT/MRI-US Automatic Fusion System Based on Vascular Matching in Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the technical success rate of real-time computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound (CT/MRI-US) automatic fusion system and the long-term therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) guided by automatic fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

139 patients with 151 HCCs were prospectively enrolled for RFA guided by an automatic CT/MRI-US fusion system (PercuNav system, Philips, the Netherlands). Automatic fusion imaging, based on vascular segmentation and registration, was performed by sonographic sweeping at the intercostal plane. The fusion quality, tumor localization confidence and technical feasibility were recorded before and after fusion using a scoring system. Technical success rate of the RFA procedure and local tumor progression (LTP) were assessed during follow-up. Analysis of technical success and LTP was performed using generalized estimating equations and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

The success rate of the fusion system was 82.7% (115/139) per patient. The mean sonographic scan time for fusion was 154.4 ± 108.4 s. In patients with successful fusion, the score indicating tumor localization confidence (2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9) and technical feasibility (2.6 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 0.7) increased after fusion (p < 0.001). The technical success rate of the RFA procedure was 96.8% (120/124) per tumor in patients with successful fusion, including poorly localized tumors. LTP rates were 8.6%, 12.2% and 15.2% at 1, 2 and 3 years.

CONCLUSION

The CT/MRI-US automatic fusion system showed a high success rate for image registration and facilitated better feasibility and a high technical success rate of RFA in HCCs, even with poor localization on US.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3b, Nonrandomized prospective study.

Combined therapy with conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma >3-<5 cm

PURPOSE

To compare safety and efficacy of combined therapy with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE)+microwave ablation (MWA) versus only TACE or MWA for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >3-<5 cm.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial (NCT04721470) screened 278 patients with HCC >3-<5 cm. Patients were randomized into three groups: 90 underwent TACE (Group 1); 95 underwent MWA (Group 2); and 93 underwent combined therapy (Group 3). Patients were followed-up with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Images were evaluated and compared for treatment response and adverse events based on modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumor. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration was measured at baseline and during every follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Final analysis included 265 patients (154 men, 111 women; mean age = 54.5 ± 11.8 years; range = 38-76 years). Complete response was achieved by 86.5% of patients who received combined therapy compared with 54.8% with only TACE and 56.5% with only MWA (p = 0.0002). The recurrence rate after 12 months was significantly lower in Group 3 (22.47%) than Groups 1 (60.7%) and 2 (51.1%) (p = 0.0001). The overall survival rate (three years after therapy) was significantly higher in Group 3 (69.6%) than Groups 1 (54.7%) and 2 (54.3%) (p = 0.02). The mean progression-free survival was significantly higher in Group 3 than groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). A decrease in AFP concentration was seen in 75%, 63%, and 48% patients of Group 3, 2, and 1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined therapy with cTACE + MWA is safe, well-tolerated, and more effective than TACE or MWA alone for treatment of HCC >3-<5 cm.

Diagnosis, Staging, and Patient Selection for Locoregional Therapy to Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality and the only cancer for which the incidence and mortality are on the rise. Sensitive and specific screening and diagnostic approaches, robust staging regimens, multidisciplinary tumor boards, and patient/family education and engagement in the shared decision-making process help to identify a patient's optimal treatment options. Locoregional therapies have been the mainstay for treating intermediate-stage disease, but they are finding special applications for early and advanced disease. This review discusses the diagnosis of HCC, current accepted staging models, and treatment of HCC, with a focus on locoregional therapies.

Microwave ablation versus sorafenib for intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular carcinoma with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness: a propensity score matching analysis

Purpose: To compared the benefits of sorafenib with microwave ablation (MWA) in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) failure.Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted using a one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and involved 52 intermediate-stage HCC patients with absence of evidence of intrahepatic vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis after TACE failure and underwent treatment with MWA or sorafenib between 2007 and 2019. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The factors with OS and PFS were determined by Cox regression.Results: Of the 52 patients included in our study, 30 (57.7%) underwent MWA and 22 (42.3%) received sorafenib. After PSM, 22 pairs were enrolled into different groups for further analysis. Patients in the MWA-group had a significantly longer median PFS than patients in the sorafenib-group on both before (median, 9.3 vs. 2.8 months, p = .001) and after PSM (median, 9.0 vs. 2.8 months, p = .006). They also had a significantly longer median OS than patients in the sorafenib-group on before (median, 48.8 vs. 16.6 months, p = .001) and after PSM (median, Not reached vs. 16.6 months, p = .001). Besides, Cox regression analysis showed that the treatment and age were the independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS (p＜0.05).Conclusions: MWA was superior to sorafenib in improving survival for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after TACE failure.Key PointsCompared with sorafenib, microwave ablation may be a more reasonable alternative treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with tumor size ≤7 cm and tumor number ≤5 after TACE refractoriness.The treatment (MWA vs sorafenib) and the age of patients were the independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS.

TACE combined with microwave ablation therapy vs. TACE alone for treatment of early- and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinomas larger than 5 cm: a meta-analysis

There are many therapeutic options for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but very limited options for unresectable HCC with a single lesion larger than 5 cm (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC] stage A) or with 2-3 nodules beyond 5 cm (BCLC stage B). Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the first-line treatment for these patients, and combination therapy has also been tried. However, the effectiveness of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with TACE in the treatment of the above tumors remains to be further confirmed. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of combination therapy and TACE monotherapy on these patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wan Fang electronic databases were retrieved to search for studies comparing combination therapy and TACE monotherapy, published between the earliest available date and August 20, 2019. A total of 20 articles (reporting 1736 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed that, compared to TACE alone, TACE + MWA resulted in significantly higher 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) (1-year OS rate: RR = 1.36, 95% CI 1.28-1.44, P < 0.001; 2-year OS rate: RR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.40-1.74, P < 0.001 and 3-year OS rate: RR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.67-2.57, P < 0.001). Complete response, partial response, and objective response rates were significantly higher in TACE + MWA than those in TACE alone (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were performed and did not show statistical significance.

Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Microwave Ablation vs. Combined With Cryoablation

Background: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ablation has been widely used for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the technique with which TACE should be combined for it to be more effective remains unknown. Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with microwave ablation (MWA) vs. TACE combined with cryoablation (CRA) in treating unresectable HCC. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to December 2018, 108 patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC were divided into either the TACE-MWA group (n = 48) or TACE-CRA group (n = 60). Overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were compared between the two groups. To reduce potential bias, a propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Complications were observed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and compared using the log-rank test. Results : The baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced. The median OS was 20.9 months (95% CI 14.3-27.6 months) in the TACE-MWA group and 13.0 months (95% CI 8.8-17.1 months) in the TACE-CRA group (P = 0.096). The median TTP was 8.8 months (95% CI 4.3-13.4 months) in the TACE-MWA group and 9.3 months (95% CI 7.1-11.5 months) in the TACE-CRA group (P = 0.675). After PSM, 48 patients remained in each group. The median OS in the TACE-MWA and TACE-CRA groups was 20.9 months (95% CI 14.3-27.6 months), and 13.5 months (95% CI 8.4-18.6 months, P = 0.100), respectively. The median TTP in the TACE-MWA and TACE-CRA groups was 8.8 months (95% CI 4.3-13.4 months), and 8.6 months (95% CI 3.1-14.2 months, P = 0.909), respectively. The overall incidence rate of ablation-related complications was lower in the TACE-MWA group than in the TACE-CRA group (66.7 vs. 88.3%, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and the maximum diameter of intrahepatic tumor were significant prognostic factors for OS and TTP. Conclusion: The efficacy of TACE-MWA and TACE-CRA in the treatment of unresectable HCC was comparable. TACE-MWA was more promising because of a lower complication rate, especially with regard to thrombocytopenia. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are required to validate our findings.

What's New in Percutaneous Ablative Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Colorectal Hepatic Metastases? 2020 Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ablation techniques are now well-established treatment options available for the management of primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Currently available ablative techniques include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and irreversible electroporation (IRE). Along with advances in navigational devices and targeting technologies, ablation combined with other therapies may be the next therapeutic option in thermal ablation. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current status of ablative technologies in interventional and medical oncology for management of liver malignancies.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the use of combination techniques (i.e., ablation and transarterial embolization procedures), thermal ablation is now moving toward treating tumors larger than 3 cm in size or tumors with macrovascular invasion. Ongoing trials are examining the optimum timing of combination therapies. Thermal ablation combined with hepatic resection may increase the number of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver who qualify for curative surgery. Combination therapies of thermal ablation and transarterial embolization allow for promising treatment responses for larger HCC. Surgery combined with thermal ablation can potentially increase the number of patients with metastatic colon cancer to the liver who qualify for curative surgery.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone or combined with ablation for recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study

PURPOSE

The recurrence after curative hepatectomy is common. Limited data have investigated the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ablation in treating recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. We aim to compare the efficacy of TACE combined with ablation versus TACE alone in treating recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy.

METHODS

A total of 183 patients with recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy were enrolled at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, including 111 patients who underwent TACE alone and 72 patients who underwent TACE combined with ablation (TACE-Ablation). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared by the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the confounding bias.

RESULTS

Before PSM, the 5-year OS rates were 43.3% vs. 27.9% (P = 0.001), and the 5-year PFS rates were 21.7% vs. 13.0% (P < 0.001) for TACE-Ablation and TACE-alone groups, respectively. After PSM, TACE-Ablation still resulted in better 5-year OS (41.6% vs. 30.2%, P = 0.028) and 5-year PFS rate (21.3% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.024) than that of TACE alone. Patients in TACE-Ablation group exhibited similar major complication rates to TACE-alone group but higher minor complication rates both before and after PSM. Cox regression analysis identified TACE-alone modality as an independently unfavourable predictor for OS and PFS (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with ablation is safe and superior to TACE alone in tumour control and prolonging overall survival in recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy.

The efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical value of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Patients and methods: Eligible studies were identified using PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, investigating the synergistic effect of TACE + MWA in the treatment of advanced HCC. Endpoints were the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates, local control rate (LCR), objective remission rate (ORR), and adverse event (AE). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size.Results: Nine studies including 351 patients in the TACE + MWA group and 653 patients in the TACE group were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were in favor of TACE + MWA (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 2.26-4.79; OR = 2.82, 95% CI 2.01-3.95; OR = 4.50, 95% CI 2.96-6.86; respectively). The pooled OR for the ORR and LCR were also in favor of TACE + MWA (OR = 4.64, 95%CI 3.11-6.91; OR = 3.93, 95% CI 2.64-5.87; respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of severe AE was observed between TACE + MWA group and TACE group (p > .05). However, subgroup analysis showed that patients with tumor size >5 cm were more likely to be benefited from TACE + MWA, rather than patients with tumor size ≤5 cm.Conclusion: With the current data, we concluded that combination TACE and MWA was safe, and should be strongly recommended to unresectable patients with tumor size >5 cm, but TACE alone was enough for unresectable patients with tumor size ≤5 cm. However, the conclusion needs further validation.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation for treatment of early liver cancer: Efficacy and prognostic factors for progression-free survival

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) are the main methods for the treatment of liver cancer worldwide. TACE can block the blood vessels of liver cancer and clearly show the area where the tumor is located. The solid tumor can be completely ablated by MWA. However, postoperative recurrence is still a difficult problem to solve.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of TACE combined with MWA in the treatment of liver cancer at early Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage and identify the factors affecting recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 42 patients with post-hepatitis B virus (HBV) liver cancer at early BCLC stage who underwent TACE combined with MWA at our hospital from February 2016 to November 2017. After surgery, the efficacy was evaluated and complications were recorded. The patients were followed at 1 mo, 2 mo, 3, mo 6 mo, 12 mo, and 18 mo after WMA for CT, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), liver function, or hepatic angiography, and the time to recurrence was recorded.

RESULTS

By the last follow-up, the total effective rate was 61.5% and the lesion control rate was 84.2%. The median progression-free-survival (PFS) was 7.3 mo (range, 2.3-34). Univariate analysis showed that female patients had a PFS of 14 mo and male patients had a PFS of 11 mo. Patients ≥ 60 years of age had a PFS of 3.8 mo, and patients < 60 years of age had a PFS of 8.9 mo. The PFS of patients with tumor < 3 cm, 3 to 5 cm, and 5-10 cm was 14, 10.5, and 11.2 mo, respectively. The PFS of patients with single tumor and multiple tumors was 13.6 and 4 mo, respectively. The PFS of patients with Child A and Child B disease was 20.8 mo vs 11.2 mo. The PFS of BCLC stage 0 patients and BCLC stage A patients was 15.5 mo vs 11.2 mo. HBV-DNA positive patients had a PFS of 11.2 mo, and HBV-DNA negative patients had a PFS of 13.3 mo. The median PFS of HBeAg-positive cases was 11.2 mo, and that of HBeAg-negative cases was 13.3 mo. Univariate analysis showed that gender, age, Child grade, number of tumors, and BCLC stage were significantly correlated with PFS, but tumor size, preoperative HBV-DNA, and HBeAg status did not. In multivariate analysis, Child grade, BCLC stage, and gender were identified to be independent risk factors for PFS in early BCLC stage liver cancer patients undergoing sequential treatment of TACE and MWA (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with MWA is safe and effective in the treatment of early BCLC stage liver cancer. Child grade, BCLC stage, and gender may affect postoperative recurrence.

Clinical conditions and treatment requirements for long-term survival among hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma initially treated with chemoembolization

OBJECTIVE

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended to treat intermediate/advanced stage of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the overall survival among initially TACE-treated patients varies significantly. The clinical characterization of long-term survival following TACE remains uncertain. We sought to identify clinical parameters and treatment requirements for long-term survival among patients with hepatitis B-related HCC who were initially treated with TACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The included patients with HCC were admitted to our cancer center between December 2009 and May 2015. Patients who survived for >3 years were compared with those who died within 3 years. The clinical and laboratory findings that were associated with the survival were also analyzed.

RESULTS

One in six (17.9%) patients with HCC in this cohort survived for > 3 years after TACE. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 23kg/m² , aspartate aminotransferase levels ≤ 40 U/L, an activated partial thromboplastin time ≤ 34 seconds, α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels ≤ 25 ng/mL, antiviral therapy, tumor size ≤ 8 cm, solitary nodule, and the absence of vascular invasion were independently favorably associated with a 3-year survival. An absence of vascular invasion was the only independent factor associated with 3-year survival in patients who received resection and/or ablation after TACE.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, a 3-year survival was associated with BMI, antivirus treatment, tumor status, hepatic function, and AFP level. Distant metastasis did not negatively impact the long-term survival among patients with hepatitis B-related HCC initially treated with TACE. Vascular invasion was the single impediment to long-term survival in patients who received add-on resection and/or ablation after TACE.

The Combination Strategy of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation or Microwave Ablation against Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary cancer of the liver. Hepatectomy and liver transplantation (LT) are regarded as the radical treatment, but great majority of patients are already in advanced stage on the first diagnosis and lose the surgery opportunity. Multifarious image-guided interventional therapies, termed as locoregional ablations, are recommended by various HCC guidelines for the clinical practice. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is firstly recommended for intermediate-stage (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B class) HCC but has lower necrosis rates. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective in treating HCCs smaller than 3 cm in size. Microwave ablation (MWA) can ablate larger tumor within a shorter time. Combination of TACE with RFA or MWA is effective and promising in treating larger HCC lesions but needs more clinical data to confirm its long-term outcome. The combination of TACE and RFA or MWA against hepatocellular carcinoma needs more clinical data for a better strategy. The characters and advantages of TACE, RFA, MWA, and TACE combined with RFA or MWA are reviewed to provide physician a better background on decision.

Efficacy of combination therapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard therapy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to determine whether combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and TACE was superior to TACE monotherapy for intermediate-stage HCC and identify cases in which this technique was the most effective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected patients with intermediate HCC who met the following eligibility criteria: (1) ≥ 20 years of age, (2) receiving initial therapy, (3) ≤7 tumors, and (4) maximum tumor diameter <5 cm. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) using potential confounding factors. We retrospectively compared the cumulative overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate between the TACE + RFA and TACE groups. Additionally, a sub-group analysis was performed for preoperative factors.

RESULTS

Among the 103 patients, 92 were selected using PSM. The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the TACE + RFA group were 97.4%, 70.4%, and 60.4%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (92.7%, 55.7%, and 22.8%, respectively, p = .045). The recurrence-free survival rates at 0.5, 1, and 2 years for the TACE + RFA group were 80.0%, 58.6%, and 33.3%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (34.5%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively, p < .01). For the sub-group with α-fetoprotein (AFP) <100 ng/mL, the TACE + RFA group demonstrated a significantly improved prognosis than the TACE group (p = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of RFA to TACE improved cumulative overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC, especially in patients with AFP <100.

Comparison of Combined Therapy Using Conventional Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Conventional Chemoembolization for Ultrasound-Invisible Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0 or A)

Objective

To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and combined therapy using cTACE and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in ultrasound (US)-invisible early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

From January 2008 to June 2016, 167 patients with US-invisible early stage HCCs were treated with cTACE alone (cTACE group; n = 85) or cTACE followed by immediate fluoroscopy-guided RFA targeting intratumoral iodized oil retention (combined group; n = 82). Procedure-related complications, local tumor progression (LTP), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

Results

There was no major complication in either group. The cTACE group showed higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year LTP rates than the combined group; i.e., 12.5%, 31.7%, and 37.0%, respectively, in the cTACE group; compared to 7.3%, 16.5%, and 16.5%, respectively, in the combined group; p = 0.013. The median TTP was 18 months in the cTACE group and 24 months in the combined group (p = 0.037). Cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 93.2%, and 87.7%, respectively, in the cTACE group and 100%, 96.6%, and 87.4%, respectively, in the combined group (p = 0.686). Tumor diameter > 20 mm and cTACE monotherapy were independent risk factors for LTP and TTP.

Conclusion

Combined therapy using cTACE followed by fluoroscopy-guided RFA is a safe and effective treatment in US-invisible early stage HCCs. It provides less LTP and longer TTP than cTACE alone.