Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Adenomyomectomy for Patients Who Want to Preserve Fertility

Prevalence, incidence, and treatment trends of adenomyosis in South Korean women for 15 years: A national population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Adenomyosis is associated with female infertility worldwide. With improvements in imaging methods, such as pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, the diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis have changed. This study aimed to evaluate the overall prevalence, incidence, and treatment trends of adenomyosis in South Korea using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database (NHIS).

METHODS

Data were collected from the Korean NHIS, a population-based complete enumeration database. A total of 678 641 women aged 11-55 years diagnosed with adenomyosis (N80.0 ICD-10 code) from the database from 2002 to 2016 were enrolled. After applying a one-year look-back method, 629 592 patients were analyzed to estimate the prevalence, incidence, and treatment trends of adenomyosis.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence during the study period was 3.86 per 1000 people. The prevalence of adenomyosis has increased from 1.42 per 1000 individuals in 2002 to 7.50 per 1000 individuals in 2016. The crude annual incidence rate of adenomyosis was 1.62 per 1000 people in 2003, which increased to 4.12 per 1000 people in 2016. In addition, the proportion of uterus-preserving surgeries in adenomyosis treatments has increased from 7.51% to 21.29% over 15 years.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and incidence of adenomyosis in South Korea increased between 2002 and 2016. Furthermore, the proportion of uterus-preserving surgeries and progestin prescriptions for adenomyosis treatment has increased. We expect that our findings will raise awareness of the necessity for fertility preservation through earlier diagnosis and proper management of patients with adenomyosis.

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is effective for long-term management of adenomyosis

BACKGROUD

Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy combined with intraoperative placement of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) is a novel conservative surgical procedure for adenomyosis. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of surgery with or without intraoperative placement of LNG-IUS treatment in adenomyosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of adenomyosis patients who received laparoscopic adenomyomectomy from January 2014 to April 2020, finally including 70 patients undergoing surgery-LNG-IUS as group A and 69 patients undegoing surgery only as group B. Risk factors for three-year relapse were analyzed using Cox's multivariate proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Visual analog scale and Mansfield-Voda-Jorgensen Menstrual Bleeding Scale scores of group A at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were significantly lower than those of group B at the corresponding points (P < .001 for both scales). Individuals in both groups showed statistically significant symptom relief. The recurrence rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B at 36 months after the surgery (2.94% vs. 32.84%, P < .001). A cox proportional hazard model showed that relapse was significantly associated with coexisting ovarian endometriosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-7.02, P = .015). Patients who received surgery-LNG-IUS had a lower risk of recurrence than those with surgery-alone (aHR, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.016-0.31, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative surgery with intraoperative placement of LNG-IUS is effective and well-accepted for long-term therapy with a lower recurrence rate for adenomyosis. Coexistent ovarian endometriosis is a major factor for adenomyosis relapse.

Clinical efficacy of a novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy in infertile women with diffuse adenomyosis

Beneficial and detrimental effect of surgical adenomyomectomy is still controversial in infertile women with severely diffuse adenomyosis. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether a novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy could improve pregnancy rates. The secondary objective was to evaluate whether it could improve dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia symptoms in infertile patients with severe adenomyosis. A prospective clinical trial was conducted between December 2007 and September 2016. Fifty women with infertility due to adenomyosis were enrolled in this study after clinical assessments by infertility experts. A novel method of fertility-preserving adenomyomectomy was performed on 45 of 50 patients. The procedure included T- or transverse H-incision of the uterine serosa followed by preparation of the serosal flap, excision of the adenomyotic tissue using argon laser under ultrasonographic monitoring, and a novel technique of suturing between the residual myometrium and serosal flap. After the adenomyomectomy, the changes in the amount of menstrual blood, relief of dysmenorrhea, pregnancy outcomes, clinical characteristics, and surgical features were recorded and analyzed. All patients obtained dysmenorrhea relief 6 months postoperatively (numeric rating scale [NRS]; 7.28 ± 2.30 vs 1.56 ± 1.30, P < .001). The amount of menstrual blood decreased significantly (140.44 ± 91.68 vs 66.33 ± 65.85 mL, P < .05). Of the 33 patients who attempted pregnancy postoperatively, 18 (54.5%) conceived either by natural means, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), or thawing embryo transfer. Miscarriage occurred in 8 patients, while 10 (30.3%) had viable pregnancies. This novel method of adenomyomectomy resulted in improved pregnancy rates, as well as relief of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia. This operation is effective in preserving fertility potential in infertile women with diffuse adenomyosis.

Anti-Müllerian hormone level may predict successful pregnancy after adenomyomectomy in patients with infertility due to adenomyosis

We aimed to determine clinical factors predicting successful pregnancy by comparing pregnancy failure and success groups after adenomyomectomy. Additionally, we analyzed fertility outcomes after adenomyomectomy.The medical records of 43 patients who had undergone adenomyomectomy and received in vitro fertilization treatment from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into pregnancy failure (n = 28) and pregnancy success (n = 15) groups. Patients' demographic factors were evaluated and compared between the groups.The age of patients was higher (39.0 [32.0-45.0] vs. 37.0 [33.0-42.0] years, P = .006) whereas the level of anti-Müllerian hormone (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]; 0.54 [0.01-8.54] vs. 2.91 [0.34-7.92] ng/mL, P = .002) lower in the pregnancy failure group compared to the pregnancy success group. The operative time was longer (220.0 [68.0-440.0] vs. 175.0 [65.0-305.0] min, P = .048) while the estimated blood loss higher (750 [100-2500] vs. 500 [50-2000] mL, P = .016) in the pregnancy failure group compared to the pregnancy success group. No significant difference was observed in body mass index, symptoms, cancer antigen 125, preoperative uterine volume, or type of adenomyosis. In the multivariate analysis, age and AMH were significant predictive factors for successful pregnancy.Ovarian reserve (age and AMH) and disease severity might be predictive factors for successful pregnancy in patients who have undergone adenomyomectomy. Adenomyomectomy should be considered for women desiring pregnancy and having appropriate ovarian reserve. Our results would be beneficial for patients and clinicians before deciding on adenomyomectomy. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.

Robotic glove port technique for the endowristed rigid instruments in robotic single-site transabdominal and transvaginal surgery

Although robotic single-site (RSS) surgery employing cross setup of semirigid instruments allows effective triangulation of instruments, it has some limitations in performing RSS transabdominal and transvaginal surgeries. We introduced the robotic glove port technique (RGPT) using parallel setup of endowristed rigid instruments in performing RSS transabdominal surgery and transvaginal surgery in July of 2017. Thirty-five patients underwent RSS surgery with RGPT. Twenty-one patients had RSS transabdominal reconstructive or fertility-preserving surgeries such as myomectomy (12 patients), adenomyomectomy (3 patients), and ovarian endometriosis cystectomy (6 patients). Fourteen patients underwent robotic transvaginal surgery for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) hysterectomy. All procedures were successfully performed, and no postoperative complications were observed. In all patients, the median total operative time, console time, and docking time were 160 min (range 106-240), 120 min (range 65-180), and 10 min (range 4-25), respectively. There was no conversion to another type of surgery, such as conventional laparoscopy, laparotomy, or traditional multiport robotic surgery. The findings showed that RSS surgery via the RGPT is safe and feasible, using the parallel setup of endowristed rigid instruments is easily performed on transvaginal routes and transabdominal routes. Therefore, this procedure may be an important complement to gynecologic surgeons' armamentarium in the field of robotic reconstructive or fertility-preserving surgeries such as myomectomy, adenomyomectomy, ovarian cystectomy, and transvaginal surgery for NOTES hysterectomy. Nevertheless, further prospective controlled studies are needed to determine its full clinical application.

Artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine

Artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced rapid growth over the past few years, moving from the experimental to the implementation phase in various fields, including medicine. Advances in learning algorithms and theories, the availability of large datasets and improvements in computing power have contributed to breakthroughs in current AI applications. Machine learning (ML), a subset of AI, allows computers to detect patterns from large complex datasets automatically and uses these patterns to make predictions. AI is proving to be increasingly applicable to healthcare, and multiple machine learning techniques have been used to improve the performance of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite various challenges, the integration of AI and reproductive medicine is bound to give an essential direction to medical development in the future. In this review, we discuss the basic aspects of AI and machine learning, and we address the applications, potential limitations and challenges of AI. We also highlight the prospects and future directions in the context of reproductive medicine.

A comparison of surgical outcomes between robot and laparoscopy-assisted adenomyomectomy

We aimed to investigate the feasibility of robotic adenomyomectomy and compared surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic approaches for adenomyomectomy.We retrospectively reviewed the data of women who were diagnosed with adenomyosis and underwent adenomyomectomy through a minimally invasive approach between January 2014 and March 2018 at the CHA Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Patient demographics and operation-related outcomes were compared between the robotic and laparoscopic surgery groups.We evaluated 43 women who underwent adenomyomectomy through a minimally invasive approach (21 underwent a laparoscopic and 22 underwent a robotic adenomyomectomy). All 22 women who had originally been scheduled to undergo robotic adenomyomectomy could successfully undergo the robotic surgery without requiring conversion to laparotomy and/or serious complications. No statistically significant differences in patient demographics were observed between the robotic and the laparoscopic surgery groups. No significant intergroup difference was observed in the operative time, estimated blood loss, weight of the resected nodule, and length of hospitalization (160.0 vs 212.5 min, P = .106; 500.0 vs 300.0 mL, P = .309; 60.0 vs 70.0 g, P = .932; and 5.0 vs 6.0 days, P = .277). No serious perioperative complications were observed in either group.Robotic adenomyomectomy is feasible for women with adenomyosis. Surgical outcomes of robotic adenomyomectomy were comparable to those of a laparoscopic approach. There was, however, no superiority of robotic adenomyomectomy in terms of surgical outcomes. Further multicenter prospective studies using standardized surgical procedures are needed to confirm the conclusion of this study.

A New Surgical Method of U-Shaped Myometrial Excavation and Modified Suture Approach with Uterus Preservation for Diffuse Adenomyosis

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new surgical method of U-shaped myometrial excavation and modified suture approach with uterus preservation for diffuse adenomyosis.

Methods

From January 2012 to December 2014, 198 patients with diffuse adenomyosis were surgically treated using this novel procedure in Zhengzhou Hua-Shan Hospital. Degree of dysmenorrhea, menstrual blood volume, serum CA 125, and uterine size before and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after surgery were compared.

Results

Postoperatively, VAS score of dysmenorrhea, menstrual blood volume, serum CA 125 level, and uterine size significantly decreased at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months from presurgical levels (all p < .001), but there were no differences at the follow-up time points. Two patients recurred at 18 months and 23 months after surgery, but both recovered after repeat surgery. Interestingly, 2 other patients recrudesced at 10 months and 12 months after surgery. In addition, only one patient was found to have a postoperative anaemia with fever, conservatively managed without surgery.

Conclusion

U-shaped myometrial excavation and modified suture approach with uterus preservation is a safe and feasible surgical approach to treat diffuse adenomyosis, with favourable outcomes.