1
|
Mason P. The importance of eggs in an environmentally sustainable diet. NUTR BULL 2023; 48:400-410. [PMID: 37593824 DOI: 10.1111/nbu.12632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Food and diet globally have a significant environmental impact. Whilst there is broad agreement on the principles underpinning a healthy, sustainable diet, the interpretation of what it might mean in practice is widely debated. Misconceptions are common, including around the environmental impact of eggs and their place in a healthy, sustainable diet. Eggs are often categorised with other animal proteins such as beef, lamb, poultry, meat and dairy when reporting on the potential environmental impact of food and diets. However, the shift towards more planet-friendly diets demands a clear understanding of the evidence base on which such a diet should be based. This review evaluates scientific reports and peer-reviewed articles that have evaluated the environmental impact of hens' eggs in terms of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), and land and water use and compared the impacts of eggs with those of other animal and plant proteins. This overview shows that eggs are responsible for less carbon, land and water use than other animal proteins, particularly beef and only slightly more than most plant proteins. Eggs are a nutritious, convenient and relatively inexpensive food, which traditionally has had an important place in the diet both in the United Kingdom and globally. It is therefore important to understand where they fit in terms of environmental impact and into advice on healthier, more sustainable dietary patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Mason
- Independent Food and Nutrition Researcher, Brecon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rahman MM, Islam ME. The impact of green accounting on environmental performance: mediating effects of energy efficiency. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2023; 30:69431-69452. [PMID: 37133665 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-27356-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between green accounting, energy efficiency, and environmental performance in the context of Bangladeshi pharmaceutical and chemical companies. The study also explores the mediating role of energy efficiency in the relationship between green accounting and environmental performance. A total of 326 responses were collected using a simple random sampling technique from pharmaceutical and chemical companies in Bangladesh. The study employed Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze the data. The results indicate that green accounting has a significant positive impact on both energy efficiency and environmental performance. Moreover, energy efficiency partially mediates the relationship between green accounting and environmental performance. The study also found that economic, environmental, and social practices of green accounting positively impact energy efficiency and environmental performance, with environmental practices having the highest impact. The findings of this study provide important insights for managers and policymakers of pharmaceutical and chemical companies in Bangladesh, highlighting the need for green accounting practices that promote environmental sustainability. The study suggests that integrating green accounting practices can lead to better energy efficiency and environmental performance, which can enhance the reputation and competitive advantage of these companies. This study identifies the mediating role of energy efficiency in the relationship between green accounting and environmental performance, providing a unique perspective on the mechanism behind the relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Mominur Rahman
- Department of Business Administration, Northern University Bangladesh, Dhaka, 1230, Bangladesh.
| | - Mohammad Ekramol Islam
- Department of Business Administration, Northern University Bangladesh, Dhaka, 1230, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maciel FDF, Gates RS, Tinôco IDFF, Sousa FCD, Pelletier N, Ibarburu-Blanc MA, Oliveira CEA. Life Cycle Assessment Project for the Brazilian Egg Industry. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:ani13091479. [PMID: 37174516 PMCID: PMC10177111 DOI: 10.3390/ani13091479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Brazil is among the ten largest egg producers in the world. The domestic consumption of Brazilian eggs is 99.6%, the rest being exported to more than 82 countries, with an expectation of growth in the foreign market. The Brazilian egg industry has evolved considerably in recent decades, incorporating new technologies and smart practices. However, there is no assessment of how production could become more sustainable over the years. The LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) approach aims to recognize the polluting potential, identify the environmental impacts generated and reduce these impacts throughout production. On a global scale, researchers approach LCA as a constructive and quantitative technique, and there is great interest in implementing an LCA for the Brazilian egg production sector. With the aim of introducing the LCA methodology to the Brazilian egg industry, this review presents the concept and accounting structure of LCA through LCI (Life Cycle Inventory) and LCIA (Life Cycle Impact Assessment), based on the ISO 14040 and 14044:2006 standards, to quantify the environmental performance of production and identify areas for future improvement, thus promoting the environmental footprint of the Brazilian egg industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiane de Fátima Maciel
- Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil
| | - Richard Stephen Gates
- Departments of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, and Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA
| | | | - Fernanda Campos de Sousa
- Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil
| | - Nathan Pelletier
- Faculty of Management, University of Britishi Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC V0A-V9Z, Canada
| | - Maro A Ibarburu-Blanc
- Departments of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, and Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kleyn FJ, Ciacciariello M. An evaluation of the protein and energy requirements in long-life laying hens. J APPL POULTRY RES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.japr.2022.100319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
5
|
Castro F, Chai L, Arango J, Owens C, Smith P, Reichelt S, DuBois C, Menconi A. Poultry industry paradigms: connecting the dots. J APPL POULTRY RES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.japr.2022.100310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
6
|
Mitrovic M, Tomasevic I, Djekic I. Assessment of Environmental Impacts from Different Perspectives-Case Study of Egg Value Chain System in Serbia. Foods 2022; 11:foods11121697. [PMID: 35741893 PMCID: PMC9223104 DOI: 10.3390/foods11121697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The environmental performance of various aspects of animal origin food supply chains has been the focus of research in recent years, and has provided useful information. However, there were no studies that covered the entire egg supply chain from different perspectives. The aim of this study was to analyze the majority of environmental impacts in the table egg supply chain comprising of three subsystems: farms, retail outlets and households, with quantification of each individual subsystem and the entire supply chain. All data were gathered from 30 farms, 50 retail stores and 300 households in Serbia. In parallel, the perception and ranking of environmental impacts along the supply chain were also evaluated. Finally, the quality function deployment for the environment was used to determine the degree of correlation between the set of environmental requirements and the identified environmental impacts. Results revealed that the greatest environmental impacts come from the production of feed for laying hens and the use of natural resources, and they contribute the most to the pollution of each individual environmental indicator. Additionally, the results show the differences in the environmental impacts of each individual subsystem and identify opportunities to mitigate them through the optimization of animal feed, energy consumption and household food waste management. The overall perspective of the egg supply chain points to climate change effects as the most important. The differences in the perceptions of environmental impacts along the entire egg supply chain suggest the need for promotion of mitigation strategies to all stakeholders that would encourage them to achieve sustainable development goals.
Collapse
|
7
|
The Impact of Genotype and Age on Energy and Protein Utilization in Individually Housed Brown Laying Hens. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11123508. [PMID: 34944284 PMCID: PMC8697930 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary An investigation into whether the nutrient requirement of egg-laying hens has changed with genotype improvements was conducted. This study compared the response of individually housed laying hens of two different genotypes and ages. The strains used were a heritage breed in mid-lay and a modern breed at peak production. Energy was utilized with the same efficiency by both strains. All hens were able to adjust their feed intake to ensure that their energy requirements were met. The modern strain utilized protein slightly more efficiently than the heritage strain. It is unlikely that the nutrient requirements of modern layer strains have increased. More likely, requirements have decreased because modern hens are lighter and have a lower daily egg output (lay smaller eggs) despite their higher lifetime egg output. Regardless, feeding programs need to be adjusted for economic reasons and depend on achievable feed intakes under particular circumstances. Abstract Responses to dietary energy and protein levels were compared between two egg-laying genotypes. Individually housed hens of a historic strain (HS) and a modern strain (MS) were compared. In Experiment 1 (Exp.1), four levels of true metabolizable energy, corrected for zero nitrogen retention (TMEn) and four levels of total lysine, were offered from 30 to 40 weeks of age. In Experiment 2 (Exp.2), three levels of apparent metabolizable energy, corrected for zero nitrogen retention (AMEn) and four levels of standardized ileal digestible lysine (SID Lys), were fed from 20 to 30 weeks of age. A randomized factorial block design (4 × 4 Exp.1 and 3 × 4 Exp.2) was applied. Energy utilization for egg output (EO) did not differ (NS), and both strains maintained a constant kJ intake (NS). The efficiency of SID Lys utilization for EO differed, with the MS being the more efficient (p < 0.034). A single model could be used to predict feed intake, using BW, EO, AMEn and SID Lys (r = 0.716). In conclusion, it is unlikely that the requirements of modern layer strains have increased. However, feeding programs should be adjusted for economic reasons and are dependent upon achievable feed intake under particular circumstances.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hens That Exhibit Poorer Feed Efficiency Produce Eggs with Lower Albumen Quality and Are Prone to Being Overweight. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11102986. [PMID: 34680005 PMCID: PMC8533006 DOI: 10.3390/ani11102986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The contemporary hybrid layer is an efficient producer of eggs, which is a source of high-quality nutrients. However, there is a lack of scientific knowledge on how feed efficiency (FE), an important measure of hen productivity, differs between individual hens during laying life and its association with other hen performance and egg quality traits. This study sought to investigate the production traits, egg composition and quality of laying hens in mid-lay when ranked based on FE in early-lay. The results showed that feed to egg conversion ratios (FCR) exhibited in early-lay were maintained until at least 40 weeks, with feed intake being the major driver of the difference in FE, not the mass of the egg. Further, hen and egg quality traits are associated during mid-lay, with high feed efficient hens having a lower body weight but producing eggs whose albumen has a higher height, Haugh unit and amino acid concentration. These results may provide important information to poultry breeders and egg producers towards improving the economics of egg production and generally improve management decision making, which is usually made based on accepting the expected average performance of a cohort of animals. Abstract Feed efficiency (FE) is an important measure of productivity in the layer industry; however, little is known about how FE differs between individual hens during the egg-laying cycle and the implications for egg quality parameters. Individual 25-week-old ISA Brown hens were observed for 42 days, ranked into three FE groups (n = 48 per High (HFE), Medium (MFE) and Low (LFE) FE groups and then monitored later in the laying cycle from 35–40 weeks. The groups exhibited different feed to egg conversion ratios (p < 0.001) from 35–40 weeks. Average daily feed intake and body weight were highest (p < 0.001) in the LFE group compared to the MFE and HFE groups, while albumen height, Haugh unit and amino acid concentrations of the albumen were significantly higher in the HFE groups compared to the LFE cohort (p < 0.001). This study concludes that FE status established in early lay is a stable variable until at least 40 weeks of age, and overweight, mid-laying hens that had poor FE produced inferior egg albumen quality measurements and composition. The distinct traits of the highly efficient hens and the poor feed efficient hens may provide important information to improving productivity in egg production.
Collapse
|
9
|
Van Eenennaam AL, Werth SJ. Animal board invited review: Animal agriculture and alternative meats - learning from past science communication failures. Animal 2021; 15:100360. [PMID: 34563799 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Sustainability discussions bring in multiple competing goals, and the outcomes are often conflicting depending upon which goal is being given credence. The role of livestock in supporting human well-being is especially contentious in discourses around sustainable diets. There is considerable variation in which environmental metrics are measured when describing sustainable diets, although some estimate of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of different diets based on varying assumptions is commonplace. A market for animal-free and manufactured food items to substitute for animal source food (ASF) has emerged, driven by the high GHG emissions of ASF. Ingredients sourced from plants, and animal cells grown in culture are two approaches employed to produce alternative meats. These can be complemented with ingredients produced using synthetic biology. Alternative meat companies promise to reduce GHG, the land and water used for food production, and reduce or eliminate animal agriculture. Some CEOs have even claimed alternative meats will 'end world hunger'. Rarely do such self-proclamations emanate from scientists, but rather from companies in their efforts to attract venture capital investment and market share. Such declarations are reminiscent of the early days of the biotechnology industry. At that time, special interest groups employed fear-based tactics to effectively turn public opinion against the use of genetic engineering to introduce sustainability traits, like disease resistance and nutrient fortification, into global genetic improvement programs. These same groups have recently turned their sights on the 'unnaturalness' and use of synthetic biology in the production of meat alternatives, leaving agriculturists in a quandary. Much of the rationale behind alternative meats invokes a simplistic narrative, with a primary focus on GHG emissions, ignoring the nutritional attributes and dietary importance of ASF, and livelihoods that are supported by grazing ruminant production systems. Diets with low GHG emissions are often described as sustainable, even though the nutritional, social and economic pillars of sustainability are not considered. Nutritionists, geneticists, and veterinarians have been extremely successful at developing new technologies to reduce the environmental footprint of ASF. Further technological developments are going to be requisite to continuously improve the efficiency of animal source, plant source, and cultured meat production. Perhaps there is an opportunity to collectively communicate how innovations are enabling both alternative- and conventional-meat producers to more sustainably meet future demand. This could counteract the possibility that special interest groups who promulgate misinformation, fear and uncertainty, will hinder the adoption of technological innovations to the ultimate detriment of global food security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Van Eenennaam
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
| | - S J Werth
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gautron J, Réhault-Godbert S, Van de Braak TGH, Dunn IC. Review: What are the challenges facing the table egg industry in the next decades and what can be done to address them? Animal 2021; 15 Suppl 1:100282. [PMID: 34246597 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been a strong consumer demand to take welfare into account in animal production, including table eggs. This is particularly true in Europe and North America but increasingly around the world. We review the main demands that are facing the egg industry driven by economic, societal and sustainability goals. We describe solutions already delivered by research and those that will be needed for the future. Already table egg consumption patterns have seen a major shift from cage to non-cage production systems because of societal pressures. These often feature free-range and organic production. These changes likely signal the future direction for the layer sector with the acceleration of the conversion of cage to barn and aviary systems with outdoor access. This can come with unintended consequences from bone fracture to increased disease exposure, all requiring solutions. In the near future, the laying period of hens will be routinely extended to improve the economics and environmental footprint of production. Many flocks already produce close to 500 eggs per hens in a lifetime, reducing the number of replacement layers and improving the economics and sustainability. It will be a challenge for scientists to optimize the genetics and the production systems to maintain the health of these hens. A major ethical issue for the egg industry is the culling of male day-old chicks of layer breeds as the meat of the males cannot be easily marketed. Much research has and will be devoted to alternatives. Another solution is elimination of male embryos prior to hatching by in ovo sexing approaches. The race to find a sustainable solution to early stage sex determination is on. Methods based on sex chromosomes, sexually dimorphic compounds and spectral properties of eggs containing male or female embryos, are being researched and are reviewed in this article. Other proposed solutions include the use of dual-purpose strains, where the males are bred to produce meat and the females to produce eggs. The dual-purpose strains are less efficient and do not compete economically in the meat or egg market; however, as consumer awareness increases viable markets are emerging. These priorities are the response to economic, environmental, ethical and consumer pressures that are already having a strong impact on the egg industry. They will continue to evolve in the next decade and if supported by a strong research and development effort, a more efficient and ethical egg-laying industry should emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gautron
- INRAE, University of Tours, BOA, 37380 Nouzilly, France.
| | | | - T G H Van de Braak
- Institut de Sélection Animale B.V, A Hendrix Genetics Company, 5831CK Boxmeer, the Netherlands
| | - I C Dunn
- The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH25 9RG Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kleyn FJ, Ciacciariello M. Future demands of the poultry industry: will we meet our commitments sustainably in developed and developing economies? WORLD POULTRY SCI J 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/00439339.2021.1904314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F. J. Kleyn
- Spesfeed Consulting (Pty) Ltd, South Africa
- Department and Animal and Poultry Science, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| | - M. Ciacciariello
- Department and Animal and Poultry Science, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Environmental sustainability assessment of poultry productions through life cycle approaches: A critical review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
13
|
Mekonnen MM, Neale CMU, Ray C, Erickson GE, Hoekstra AY. Water productivity in meat and milk production in the US from 1960 to 2016. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2019; 132:105084. [PMID: 31415964 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Global demand for livestock products is rising, resulting in a growing demand for feed and potentially burdening freshwater resources to produce this feed. To offset this increased pressure on water resources, the environmental performance of livestock sector should continue to improve. Over the last few decades, product output per animal and feedstuff yields in the US have improved, but before now it was unclear to what extent these improvements influenced the water productivity (WP) of the livestock products. In this research, we estimate changes in WP of animal products from 1960 to 2016. We consider feed conversion ratios (dry matter intake per head divided by product output per head), feed composition per animal category, and estimated the water footprint of livestock production following the Water Footprint Network's Water Footprint Assessment methodology. The current WP of all livestock products appears to be much better than in 1960. The observed improvements in WPs are due to a number of factors, including increases in livestock productivity, feed conversion ratios and feed crop yields, the latter one reducing the water footprint of feed inputs. Monogastric animals (poultry and swine) have a high feed-use efficiency compared to ruminants (cattle), but ruminants consume relatively large portion of feed that is non-edible for humans. Per unit of energy content, milk has the largest WP followed by chicken and pork. Per gram of protein, poultry products (chicken meat, egg and turkey meat) have the largest WP, followed by cattle milk and pork. Beef has the smallest WP. These data provide important information that may aid the development of strategies to improve WP of the livestock sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesfin M Mekonnen
- Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute, University of Nebraska, Nebraska Innovation Campus, 2021 Transformation Dr., Suite 3220, Lincoln NE68588, USA.
| | - Christopher M U Neale
- Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute, University of Nebraska, Nebraska Innovation Campus, 2021 Transformation Dr., Suite 3220, Lincoln NE68588, USA
| | - Chittaranjan Ray
- Nebraska Water Center, Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Global Institute, University of Nebraska, Nebraska Innovation Campus, 2021 Transformation Dr., Suite 3220, Lincoln NE68588, USA
| | - Galen E Erickson
- Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA
| | - Arjen Y Hoekstra
- Twente Water Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, the Netherlands; Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469A Bukit Timah Road, 259770, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Considerations on the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Animal-based Policies. SUSTAINABILITY 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/su11082316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The contribution of the livestock sector to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as the worsening of animal welfare, with the intensification of production methods, have become increasingly relevant. Our contribution investigates the environmental impacts, in terms of methane and nitrous oxide emissions, of animal-based policies supported by the European Union. We examine factors affecting the adoption and the magnitude of related budget of Measure 215—animal welfare—of Rural Development Programmes 2007–2013. Our focus is cattle farming in Italy. The results highlight that the problem of animal welfare is highly perceived in regions with greater livestock intensity, also where GHG emissions are relevant. Given the adoption of measure 215, more budget tends to be allocated in regions where livestock units are particularly high. In addition, from the analysis emerges the bargaining position of regions with a higher propensity to the agricultural sector.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Livestock production is a major global source of greenhouse gas emissions [...]
Collapse
|
17
|
Cesari V, Zucali M, Bava L, Gislon G, Tamburini A, Toschi I. Environmental impact of rabbit meat: The effect of production efficiency. Meat Sci 2018; 145:447-454. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Revised: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
18
|
Sustainability in the Canadian Egg Industry—Learning from the Past, Navigating the Present, Planning for the Future. SUSTAINABILITY 2018. [DOI: 10.3390/su10103524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Like other livestock sectors, the Canadian egg industry has evolved substantially over time and will likely experience similarly significant change looking forward, with many of these changes determining the sustainability implications of and for the industry. Influencing factors include: technological and management changes at farm level and along the value chain resulting in greater production efficiencies and improved life cycle resource efficiency and environmental performance; a changing policy/regulatory environment; and shifts in societal expectations and associated market dynamics, including increased attention to animal welfare outcomes—especially in regard to changes in housing systems for laying hens. In the face of this change, effective decision-making is needed to ensure the sustainability of the Canadian egg industry. Attention both to lessons from the past and to the emerging challenges that will shape its future is required and multi- and interdisciplinary perspectives are needed to understand synergies and potential trade-offs between alternative courses of action across multiple aspects of sustainability. Here, we consider the past, present and potential futures for this industry through the lenses of environmental, institutional (i.e., regulatory), and socio-economic sustainability, with an emphasis on animal welfare as an important emergent social consideration. Our analysis identifies preferred pathways, potential pitfalls, and outstanding cross-disciplinary research questions.
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hongwei Xin
- Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50014
- Egg Industry Center, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50014
| | - Kai Liu
- Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50014
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ni JQ. Research and demonstration to improve air quality for the U.S. animal feeding operations in the 21st century - a critical review. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2015; 200:105-119. [PMID: 25703580 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2015] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
There was an increasing interest in reducing production and emission of air pollutants to improve air quality for animal feeding operations (AFOs) in the U.S. in the 21st century. Research was focused on identification, quantification, characterization, and modeling of air pollutions; effects of emissions; and methodologies and technologies for scientific research and pollution control. Mitigation effects were on pre-excretion, pre-release, pre-emission, and post-emission. More emphasis was given on reducing pollutant emissions than improving indoor air quality. Research and demonstrations were generally continuation and improvement of previous efforts. Most demonstrated technologies were still in a limited scale of application. Future efforts are needed in many fundamental and applied research areas. Advancement in instrumentation, computer technology, and biological sciences and genetic engineering is critical to bring major changes in this area. Development in research and demonstration will depend on the actual political, economic, and environmental situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Qin Ni
- Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, 225 S University St., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wu G, Bazer FW, Cross HR. Land-based production of animal protein: impacts, efficiency, and sustainability. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014; 1328:18-28. [DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Guoyao Wu
- Department of Animal Science; Texas A&M University; College Station Texas
| | - Fuller W. Bazer
- Department of Animal Science; Texas A&M University; College Station Texas
| | - H. Russell Cross
- Department of Animal Science; Texas A&M University; College Station Texas
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, Milo R. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:11996-2001. [PMID: 25049416 PMCID: PMC4143028 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1402183111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Livestock production impacts air and water quality, ocean health, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on regional to global scales and it is the largest use of land globally. Quantifying the environmental impacts of the various livestock categories, mostly arising from feed production, is thus a grand challenge of sustainability science. Here, we quantify land, irrigation water, and reactive nitrogen (Nr) impacts due to feed production, and recast published full life cycle GHG emission estimates, for each of the major animal-based categories in the US diet. Our calculations reveal that the environmental costs per consumed calorie of dairy, poultry, pork, and eggs are mutually comparable (to within a factor of 2), but strikingly lower than the impacts of beef. Beef production requires 28, 11, 5, and 6 times more land, irrigation water, GHG, and Nr, respectively, than the average of the other livestock categories. Preliminary analysis of three staple plant foods shows two- to sixfold lower land, GHG, and Nr requirements than those of the nonbeef animal-derived calories, whereas irrigation requirements are comparable. Our analysis is based on the best data currently available, but follow-up studies are necessary to improve parameter estimates and fill remaining knowledge gaps. Data imperfections notwithstanding, the key conclusion--that beef production demands about 1 order of magnitude more resources than alternative livestock categories--is robust under existing uncertainties. The study thus elucidates the multiple environmental benefits of potential, easy-to-implement dietary changes, and highlights the uniquely high resource demands of beef.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gidon Eshel
- Physics Department, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504-5000;
| | - Alon Shepon
- Department of Plant Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; and
| | - Tamar Makov
- Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT 06511
| | - Ron Milo
- Department of Plant Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; and
| |
Collapse
|