1
|
Rabuma T, Moronta-Barrios F, Craig W. Navigating biosafety regulatory frameworks for genetic engineering in Africa: a focus on genome editing and gene drive technologies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024; 12:1483279. [PMID: 39512657 PMCID: PMC11540646 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1483279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Genome editing and gene drive technologies are increasingly gaining attraction in Africa, with researchers exploring their potential applications in agriculture, health and the environment. Acknowledging that robust regulatory frameworks are crucial in facilitating the development and utilization of these technologies, informed decision-making is, however, being impeded by the fragmented information availability and readiness of regulatory authorities on the continent. Objectives This study investigates the regulatory frameworks governing genome editing and gene drive technologies in African countries, identifies common regulatory challenges and proposes actionable solutions. Methods Primary data were collected through questionnaires and complemented by analysing existing biosafety regulations from online databases and scientific literature. Results Our findings suggest that while a few African countries have recently updated their regulatory frameworks, many are still under discussion. Challenges to development and implementation include limited resources, expertise, awareness, and public resistance. Conclusion The findings underscore the urgent need for further development in regulatory capacities. By shedding light on these challenges, our study could provide African regulators with valuable insights to guide the formulation of effective regulatory frameworks. Such frameworks are essential for harnessing the potential of genome editing and gene drive technologies while safeguarding human health and the environment in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilahun Rabuma
- Department of Biotechnology, College of Natural and Computational Science, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia
- Regulatory Science Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
| | - Felix Moronta-Barrios
- Regulatory Science Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
| | - Wendy Craig
- Regulatory Science Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Apio HB, Elegba W, Nunekpeku W, Otu SA, Baguma JK, Alicai T, Danso KE, Bimpong IK, Ogwok E. Effect of gamma irradiation on proliferation and growth of friable embryogenic callus and in vitro nodal cuttings of ugandan cassava genotypes. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2024; 15:1414128. [PMID: 39351022 PMCID: PMC11439714 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1414128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) production and productivity in Africa is affected by two viral diseases; cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD). Induced mutagenesis of totipotent/embryogenic tissues or in vitro plant material can lead to the generation of CMD and/or CBSD tolerant mutants. To massively produce non-chimeric plants timely and with less labor, totipotent cells or tissues are a pre-requisite. This study aimed to determine the effect of gamma radiation on the proliferation and growth of friable embryogenic callus (FEC) and in vitro nodal cuttings respectively. To obtain FEC, 2-6 mm sized leaf lobes of nine cassava genotypes were plated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal media supplemented with varying levels (37, 50, 70, 100) μM of picloram for production of organized embryogenic structures (OES). The OES of five cassava genotypes (Alado, CV-60444, NASE 3, NASE 13 and TME 204) were crushed and plated in Gresshoff and Doy (GD) basal media in combination with the amino acid tyrosine in varying concentrations for FEC production. FEC from five cassava genotypes and in vitro nodal cuttings of nine genotypes were irradiated using five different gamma doses (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 Gy) at a dose rate of 81Gy/hr. The lethal dose (LD)50 was determined using the number of roots produced and flow cytometry was done to determine the ploidy status of plants. The highest production of OES was noted in Alado across varying picloram concentrations, while TME 204 obtained the highest amount of FEC. The irradiated FEC gradually died and by 28 days post irradiation, FEC from all five cassava genotypes were lost. Conversely, the irradiated in vitro nodal cuttings survived and some produced roots, while others produced callus. The LD50 based on number of roots varied from genotype to genotype, but plants remained diploid post-irradiation. Accordingly, the effect of gamma irradiation on Ugandan cassava genotypes (UCGs) was genotype-dependent. This information is foundational for the use of in vitro tissues as target material for cassava mutation breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hellen B. Apio
- Tissue culture and Transformation Laboratory, National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Wilfred Elegba
- Biotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute (BNARI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), Accra, Ghana
| | - Wonder Nunekpeku
- Biotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute (BNARI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), Accra, Ghana
| | - Solomon Ayeboafo Otu
- Biotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute (BNARI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), Accra, Ghana
| | - Julius Karubanga Baguma
- Tissue culture and Transformation Laboratory, National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Titus Alicai
- Tissue culture and Transformation Laboratory, National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Kenneth Ellis Danso
- Biotechnology and Nuclear Agriculture Research Institute (BNARI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), Accra, Ghana
- School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
| | - Isaac Kofi Bimpong
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, Joint Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO)/International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Centre of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria
| | - Emmanuel Ogwok
- Tissue culture and Transformation Laboratory, National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Science and Vocational Education, Faculty of Science, Lira University, Lira, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mmbando GS. The legal aspect of the current use of genetically modified organisms in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. GM CROPS & FOOD 2023; 14:1-12. [PMID: 37158150 PMCID: PMC10171133 DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2208999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Many African nations place a high priority on enhancing food security and nutrition. However, unfavorable environmental conditions interfere with the achievement of food security in Africa. The production of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) presents intriguing possibilities for improving food security on the continent. In Africa, countries in the same regions have different GMO usage policies and laws. While some nations are updating their laws and policies to allow GMOs, others are still debating whether they are worth the risk. However, there is still little information available regarding the most recent status of GMO applications in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. The current review summarizes the state of GMO applications for enhancing food security in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. Currently, Tanzania and Uganda do not accept GMOs, but Kenya does. This study can assist governments, academics, and policymakers in enhancing GMO acceptance for boosting nutrition and food security in their nations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gideon Sadikiel Mmbando
- Department of Biology, College of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, University of Dodoma (UDOM), Dodoma, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Melnick RL, Jarvis L, Hendley P, Garcia-Alonso M, Metzger MJ, Ramankutty N, Teem JL, Roberts A. GEnZ explorer: a tool for visualizing agroclimate to inform research and regulatory risk assessment. Transgenic Res 2023; 32:321-337. [PMID: 37278871 PMCID: PMC10409678 DOI: 10.1007/s11248-023-00354-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Confined field trials (CFT) of genetically engineered (GE) crops are used to generate data to inform environmental risk assessments (ERA). ERAs are required by regulatory authorities before novel GE crops can be released for cultivation. The transportability of CFT data to inform risk assessment in countries other than those where the CFT was conducted has been discussed previously in an analysis showing that the primary difference between CFT locations potentially impacting trial outcomes is the physical environment, particularly the agroclimate. This means that data from trials carried out in similar agroclimates could be considered relevant and sufficient to satisfy regulatory requirements for CFT data, irrespective of the country where the CFTs are conducted. This paper describes the development of an open-source tool to assist in determining the transportability of CFT data. This tool provides agroclimate together with overall crop production information to assist regulators and applicants in making informed choices on whether data from previous CFTs can inform an environmental risk assessment in a new country, as well as help developers determine optimal locations for planning future CFTs. The GEnZ Explorer is a freely available, thoroughly documented, and open-source tool that allows users to identify the agroclimate zones that are relevant for the production of 21 major crops and crop categories or to determine the agroclimatic zone at a specific location. This tool will help provide additional scientific justification for CFT data transportability, along with spatial visualization, to help ensure regulatory transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Larissa Jarvis
- McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul Hendley
- Phasera Ltd., 7 Kenilworth Avenue, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
| | | | - Marc J Metzger
- School of Geosciences, Geography and the Lived Environment, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Navin Ramankutty
- School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John L Teem
- Genetic Biocontrols LLC, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Roberts
- Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Turnbull C, Lillemo M, Hvoslef-Eide TAK. Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 12:630396. [PMID: 33719302 PMCID: PMC7943453 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.630396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Products derived from agricultural biotechnology is fast becoming one of the biggest agricultural trade commodities globally, clothing us, feeding our livestock, and fueling our eco-friendly cars. This exponential growth occurs despite asynchronous regulatory schemes around the world, ranging from moratoriums and prohibitions on genetically modified (GM) organisms, to regulations that treat both conventional and biotech novel plant products under the same regulatory framework. Given the enormous surface area being cultivated, there is no longer a question of acceptance or outright need for biotech crop varieties. Recent recognition of the researchers for the development of a genome editing technique using CRISPR/Cas9 by the Nobel Prize committee is another step closer to developing and cultivating new varieties of agricultural crops. By employing precise, efficient, yet affordable genome editing techniques, new genome edited crops are entering country regulatory schemes for commercialization. Countries which currently dominate in cultivating and exporting GM crops are quickly recognizing different types of gene-edited products by comparing the products to conventionally bred varieties. This nuanced legislative development, first implemented in Argentina, and soon followed by many, shows considerable shifts in the landscape of agricultural biotechnology products. The evolution of the law on gene edited crops demonstrates that the law is not static and must adjust to the mores of society, informed by the experiences of 25 years of cultivation and regulation of GM crops. The crux of this review is a consolidation of the global legislative landscape on GM crops, as it stands, building on earlier works by specifically addressing how gene edited crops will fit into the existing frameworks. This work is the first of its kind to synthesize the applicable regulatory documents across the globe, with a focus on GM crop cultivation, and provides links to original legislation on GM and gene edited crops.
Collapse
|
6
|
Pesticide Use Practices in Root, Tuber, and Banana Crops by Smallholder Farmers in Rwanda and Burundi. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16030400. [PMID: 30708958 PMCID: PMC6388262 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Misuse and poor handling of chemical pesticides in agriculture is hazardous to the health of farmers, consumers, and to the environment. We studied the pest and disease management practices and the type of pesticides used in four root, tuber, and banana (RTB) crops in Rwanda and Burundi through in-depth interviews with a total of 811 smallholder farmers. No chemical pesticides were used in banana in either Rwanda and Burundi, whereas the use of insecticides and fungicides in potato was quite frequent. Nearly all insecticides and about one third of the fungicides used are moderately hazardous. Personal protective equipment was used by less than a half of the interviewed farmers in both countries. Reported cases of death due to self- or accidental-poisoning among humans and domestic animals in the previous 12 months were substantial in both countries. Training of farmers and agrochemical retailers in safe use of pesticide and handling and, use of integrated pest management approaches to reduce pest and disease damage is recommended.
Collapse
|