Model Transferability and Reduced Experimental Burden in Cell Culture Process Development Facilitated by Hybrid Modeling and Intensified Design of Experiments

Hybrid deep modeling of a CHO-K1 fed-batch process: combining first-principles with deep neural networks

Introduction: Hybrid modeling combining First-Principles with machine learning is becoming a pivotal methodology for Biopharma 4.0 enactment. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells, being the workhorse for industrial glycoproteins production, have been the object of several hybrid modeling studies. Most previous studies pursued a shallow hybrid modeling approach based on three-layered Feedforward Neural Networks (FFNNs) combined with macroscopic material balance equations. Only recently, the hybrid modeling field is incorporating deep learning into its framework with significant gains in descriptive and predictive power. Methods: This study compares, for the first time, deep and shallow hybrid modeling in a CHO process development context. Data of 24 fed-batch cultivations of a CHO-K1 cell line expressing a target glycoprotein, comprising 30 measured state variables over time, were used to compare both methodologies. Hybrid models with varying FFNN depths (3-5 layers) were systematically compared using two training methodologies. The classical training is based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, indirect sensitivity equations and cross-validation. The deep learning is based on the Adaptive Moment Estimation Method (ADAM), stochastic regularization and semidirect sensitivity equations. Results and conclusion: The results point to a systematic generalization improvement of deep hybrid models over shallow hybrid models. Overall, the training and testing errors decreased by 14.0% and 23.6% respectively when applying the deep methodology. The Central Processing Unit (CPU) time for training the deep hybrid model increased by 31.6% mainly due to the higher FFNN complexity. The final deep hybrid model is shown to predict the dynamics of the 30 state variables within the error bounds in every test experiment. Notably, the deep hybrid model could predict the metabolic shifts in key metabolites (e.g., lactate, ammonium, glutamine and glutamate) in the test experiments. We expect deep hybrid modeling to accelerate the deployment of high-fidelity digital twins in the biopharma sector in the near future.

From Spatial-Temporal Multiscale Modeling to Application: Bridging the Valley of Death in Industrial Biotechnology

The Valley of Death confronts industrial biotechnology with a significant challenge to the commercialization of products. Fortunately, with the integration of computation, automation and artificial intelligence (AI) technology, the industrial biotechnology accelerates to cross the Valley of Death. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) has spurred advanced development of intelligent biomanufacturing, which has evolved the industrial structures in line with the worldwide trend. To achieve this, intelligent biomanufacturing can be structured into three main parts that comprise digitalization, modeling and intellectualization, with modeling forming a crucial link between the other two components. This paper provides an overview of mechanistic models, data-driven models and their applications in bioprocess development. We provide a detailed elaboration of the hybrid model and its applications in bioprocess engineering, including strain design, process control and optimization, as well as bioreactor scale-up. Finally, the challenges and opportunities of biomanufacturing towards Industry 4.0 are also discussed.

Machine learning in bioprocess development: from promise to practice

Fostered by novel analytical techniques, digitalization, and automation, modern bioprocess development provides large amounts of heterogeneous experimental data, containing valuable process information. In this context, data-driven methods like machine learning (ML) approaches have great potential to rationally explore large design spaces while exploiting experimental facilities most efficiently. Herein we demonstrate how ML methods have been applied so far in bioprocess development, especially in strain engineering and selection, bioprocess optimization, scale-up, monitoring, and control of bioprocesses. For each topic, we will highlight successful application cases, current challenges, and point out domains that can potentially benefit from technology transfer and further progress in the field of ML.

Boost dynamic protocols for producing mammalian biopharmaceuticals with intensified DoE—a practical guide to analyses with OLS and hybrid modeling

Introduction: For the implementation of robust bioprocesses, understanding of temporal cell behavior with respect to relevant inputs is crucial. Intensified Design of Experiments (iDoE) is an efficient tool to assess the joint influence of input parameters by including intra-experimental changes.

Methods: We applied iDoE to the production phase of a monoclonal antibody in a mammalian bioprocess. The multidimensional design space spanned by temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), timing of change, and growth category was investigated in 12 cultivations. We built ordinary least squares (OLS) and hybrid models (HM) on the iDoE-data, validated them with classical DoE (cDoE)-derived data, and used the models as in silico representation for process optimization.

Results: If the complexity of interactions between changing setpoints of inputs is sufficiently captured during planning and modeling, iDoE proved to be valid for characterizing the mammalian biopharmaceutical production phase. For local behavior and flexible composition of optimization goals, OLS regressions can easily be implemented. To predict global and interconnected dynamics while incorporating mass balances, HM holds potential.

Discussion: iDoE will boost protocols that optimize inputs for different bioprocess phases. The described key aspects of OLS- and HM-based analyses of iDoE-data shall guide future applications during manufacturing.

Comparison of mechanistic and hybrid modeling approaches for characterization of a CHO cultivation process: Requirements, pitfalls and solution paths

Despite the advantages of mathematical bioprocess modeling, successful model implementation already starts with experimental planning and accordingly can fail at this early stage. For this study, two different modeling approaches (mechanistic and hybrid) based on a four-dimensional antibody-producing CHO fed-batch process are compared. Overall, 33 experiments are performed in the fractional factorial four-dimensional design space and separated into four different complex data partitions subsequently used for model comparison and evaluation. The mechanistic model demonstrates the advantage of prior knowledge (i.e., known equations) to get informative value relatively independently of the utilized data partition. The hybrid approach displayes a higher data dependency but simultaneously yielded a higher accuracy on all data partitions. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that independent of the chosen modeling framework, a smart selection of only four initial experiments can already yield a very good representation of a full design space independent of the chosen modeling structure. Academic and industry researchers are recommended to pay more attention to experimental planning to maximize the process understanding obtained from mathematical modeling.