Stability Evaluation of Different Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs in Normal and Osteoporotic Condition - A Finite Element Based Study

Understanding the influence of cage and instrumentation strategies with oblique lumbar interbody fusion for grade I spondylolisthesis - A comprehensive biomechanical modeling study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Proper implant selection and placement in oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion (OLIF) are essential to achieve the best possible results for the patient. Key factors such as interbody cage length, height, angle, and material must all be carefully considered to achieve the intended results and minimize complications. Significant challenges remain in selecting the appropriate cage parameters to control spinal alignment while minimizing subsidence risk. Ongoing debates include how long a cage should be to optimize load distribution, as well as how variations in cage angle and placement influence the outcomes.

PURPOSE

This study aims to biomechanically model and investigate how variations in interbody cage dimensions, positioning, and material properties influence indirect decompression, realignment, and resulting stresses involved in cage subsidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Computational biomechanical study of interbody cage and OLIF influence on correction outcomes.

METHODS

A pathological finite element model of the L4-L5 segment presenting a grade I spondylolisthesis was used to simulate 172 different OLIF configurations, evaluating cage position (anterior, central, posterior), angle (6° or 12°), material (PEEK or titanium), length (40-60 mm), and height (10-14 mm). Bilateral pedicle screw fixation was also tested. The simulated outcomes included disc height, foraminal and spinal canal dimensions, segmental lordosis, vertebral slip, endplate stresses, and displacements under various loading conditions. Statistical comparisons were tested to analyze the influence of model, implant, and surgical parameters on correction outcomes.

RESULTS

Longer (left-to-right dimension) cages (60 mm), which overhang on both sides of the vertebrae and sit on the apophyseal ring, significantly reduced vertebral endplate displacements and stresses by 33 % compared to shorter cages (40 mm) (p < 0.05). Posterior cage positioning improved the decompression but raised stresses by 45 % and reduced segmental lordosis by 28 %. Lowering cage height from 14 to 10 mm and increasing the angle from 6° to 12° reduced endplate stresses by 53 % and 33 %, respectively. BPS fixation decreased stresses by 36 % on average. The trends observed concurred with recently published OLIF clinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the biomechanical influence of implant characteristics and positioning on OLIF results and subsidence risks. Competing factors unveil an optimization problem that can be effectively addressed with the help of accurate, robust, and reproducible numerical simulations and regression models. This study further confirms that the developed tools not only accurately simulate the surgical approach and corroborate clinical findings but also offer a relevant framework for in-depth analysis.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Leveraging numerical methods, this study provides biomechanical insights into how variations in cage parameters during OLIF procedures influence outcomes. The findings aim to help clinicians refine strategies to attain desired outcomes (decompression and alignment) while understanding the consequences on the risk of subsidence. By aligning with clinical trends, our results offer valuable explanations and support for biomechanical-based surgical decision-making.

Biomechanical Effects of Different Spacing Distributions Between the Cemented Superior Boundary and Surgical Vertebral Superior Endplates After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) treated with vertebroplasty (PVP) are experiencing an increasing number of problems such as pain recurrence, mainly due to recompression fractures of the operated vertebral body within a certain period of time after the operation, which is closely related to the distribution of intraoperative bone cement. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different spacing distributions between the upper boundary of the cement and the upper endplate of the operated vertebra on the biomechanics of the operated vertebra after percutaneous vertebroplasty for OVCF using finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

One patient with L1 vertebral body OVCF was selected, and computed tomography (CT) of the thoracolumbar segment was performed. The CT data were extracted to establish an FEA model of the T12-L2 vertebral bodies. Bone cement was injected into the L1 vertebral body. Based on the spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the vertebral body's upper endplates, the model vertebrae were divided into 0, 2, 4, and 6 mm spacing groups, and the human body's upright, flexion-extension, lateral flexion, and rotational positions were simulated. The biomechanical effects of different spacing distributions on the postoperative L1 vertebral body and the injected bone cement were evaluated.

RESULTS

In this paper, we found that the Von Mises stress of the L1 vertebrae was the smallest when the spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the vertebral body's upper endplates was 0 mm. The larger the spacing in a certain range between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the vertebral body's upper endplates, the greater the Von Mises stress of the L1 vertebrae. However, in the stress comparison of the injected bone cement, the Von Mises stress of the bone cement was greatest when the spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the upper endplate of the vertebral body was 0 mm; the larger the spacing, the smaller the Von Mises stress.

CONCLUSION

When the contact spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the upper endplate of the vertebral body is 0 mm, it can effectively eliminate and transfer the pressure caused by the load, thus reducing the stress on the cancellous bone and further reducing the risk of vertebral refracture after surgery.

Biomechanical insights into anterolateral vertebral screw fixation in osteoporotic spines: a comparative study of fixation methods and positions using porcine vertebrae

OBJECTIVE

Combining oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) has been proposed to reduce cage subsidence, especially in osteoporotic spines. Recently, anterolateral screw-rod fixation has gained interest as it allows direct pathology observation and avoids a posterior approach. However, controversies exist between anterolateral screw fixation systems and traditional PPSF due to variations in osteoporotic vertebral mineral density, screw fixation positions, and fixation methods (bicortical vs. unicortical). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical impact of fixation position and method in osteoporotic spine.

METHODS

Seventy-two fresh‑frozen porcine vertebrae (L1-6) were decalcified using 0.5 M EDTA and divided into two groups based on fixation method: bicortical or unicortical. Six groups for each method were created according to the screw position in the lateral vertebral body, with six specimens in each group: anterior, central, and posterior in the middle body and para-endplate regions. Correlations among screw position, fixation method and axial pullout strength were analyzed.

RESULTS

A 4-week decalcification process, bone mineral density in the porcine vertebrae decreased to approximately 48% (p < 0.05) of the original value, categorizing them as osteoporotic. Bicortical fixation showed significantly greater pullout forces than unicortical fixation, with differences ranging from 82 to 273%. Notably, central or posterior screws outperformed anterior screws in pullout strength.

CONCLUSION

Bicortical fixation exhibited significantly greater pullout forces than unicortical fixation. We suggest positioning screws in the central or posterior region of the middle body with bicortical fixation in osteoporotic vertebrae.

Biomechanical modelling of indirect decompression in oblique lumbar intervertebral fusions - A finite element study

BACKGROUND

Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion aims to decompress spinal nerves via an interbody fusion cage, but the optimal surgical strategy, including implant selection for specific patient characteristics, remains unclear. A biomechanical model was developed to assess how pathophysiological characteristics and instrumentation impact spinal realignment, indirect decompression, and cage subsidence risk.

METHODS

A finite element model of the L4-L5 segment was derived from a validated asymptomatic T1-S1 spine model. Five cases of grade I spondylolisthesis with normal or osteoporotic bone densities and initial disc heights of 4.3 to 8.3 mm were simulated. Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion with cage heights of 10, 12, and 14 mm (12° lordosis) was examined. Postoperative changes in disc height, foraminal and spinal canal dimensions, segmental lordosis, and vertebral slip were assessed. Vertebral stresses and displacements under 10 Nm flexion and 400 N gravitational load were compared between stand-alone constructs and bilateral pedicle screw fixation using rods of 4.75, 5.5, and 6 mm diameters.

FINDINGS

Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion significantly improved postoperative disc height, foraminal and spinal canal dimensions, with the greatest enhancements observed with 14 mm cages. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation markedly reduced cortical endplate stresses and displacements compared to stand-alone constructs, with added benefits from larger rod diameters. Low bone density increased displacements by 63 %.

INTERPRETATION

Thicker cages achieve better decompression but increase subsidence risk. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation with 6 mm rods minimizes endplate stresses and displacements, especially in osteoporotic cases. Future research will validate these findings and explore the model's potential for surgical planning.

Biomechanical assessment of anterior plate system, bilateral pedicle screw and transdiscal screw system for high-grade spondylolisthesis: a finite element study

Introduction

Limited information regarding the biomechanical evaluation of various internal fixation techniques for high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis is available. The stiffness of the operated segment and stress on the hardware can profoundly influence clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to quantitatively investigate biomechanical profiles of various fusion methods used for high-grade spondylolisthesis by using finite element (FE) analysis.

Methods

An FE lumbar spine model of healthy spine was developed based on a patient's CT scan. High-grade (III-IV) spondylolisthesis (SP model) was created by sliding L5 anteriorly and modifying L5-S1 facet joints. Three treatment scenarios were created by adding various implants to the model. These scenarios included L5-S1 interbody cage in combination with three different fixation methods-the anterior plate system (APS), bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS), and transdiscal screw system (TSS). Range of motion (ROM), von Mises stress on cage, internal fixation as well as on the adjacent annuli were obtained and compared. The resistance to slippage was investigated by applying shear force on L5 vertebra and measuring its displacement regarding to S1.

Results

Under different loading conditions all treatment scenarios showed substantial reduction of ROM in comparison with SP model. No notable differences in ROM were observed between treatment models. There was no notable difference in cage stress among models. The von Mises stress on the internal fixation in the TSS model was less than in APS and BPSS. The TSS model demonstrated superior resistance to shear load compared to APS and BPSS. No discernible difference was observed between the SP, APS, BPSS, and TSS models when compared the ROM for adjacent level L4-L5. TSS's von Mises stress of the adjacent annulus was higher than in APS and BPSS.

Conclusions

The TSS model exhibited biomechanical superiority over the APS and BPSS models.

Calcium phosphate complex of recombinant human thrombomodulin promote bone formation in interbody fusion

Interbody fusion is an orthopedic surgical procedure to connect two adjacent vertebrae in patients suffering from spinal disc disease. The combination of synthetic bone grafts with protein-based drugs is an intriguing approach to stimulate interbody bone growth, specifically in patients exhibiting restricted bone progression. Recombinant human thrombomodulin (rhTM), a novel protein drug characterized by its superior stability and potency, shows promise in enhancing bone formation. A composite bone graft, termed CaP-rhTM, has been synthesized, combining calcium phosphate (CaP) microparticles as a delivery vehicle for rhTM to facilitate interbody fusion.In vitrostudies have demonstrated that rhTM significantly promotes the proliferation and maturation of preosteoblasts at nanogram dosage, while exerting minimal impact on osteosarcoma cell growth. The expression levels of mature osteoblast markers, including osteocalcin, osteopontin, alkaline phosphatase, and calcium deposition were also enhanced by rhTM. In rat caudal disc model of interbody fusion, CaP-rhTM with 800 ng of drug dosage was implanted along with a polylactic acid cage, to ensure structural stability within the intervertebral space. Microcomputed tomography analyses revealed that from 8 to 24 weeks, CaP-rhTM substantially improves both bone volume and trabecular architecture, in addition to the textural integrity of bony endplate surfaces. Histological examination confirmed the formation of a continuous bone bridge connecting adjacent vertebrae. Furthermore, biomechanical assessment via three-point bending tests indicated an improved bone quality of the fused disc. This study has demostrated that rhTM exhibits considerable potential in promoting osteogenesis. The use of CaP-rhTM has also shown significant improvements in promoting interbody fusion.

Biomechanical study between percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with cement pedicle plasty improves vertebral biomechanical stability: A finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the biomechanical effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with cement pedicle plasty (PVCPP) on the unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) through finite element (FE) analysis. The study compares the biomechanical stability of finite element models between percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with cement pedicle plasty.

METHODS

Two patients with unstable OVFs underwent computed tomography (CT) examination at the thoracolumbar vertebral body levels, respectively. The CT images were reconstructed into three-dimensional finite element models to simulate stress conditions across six dimensions and to evaluate the vertebral von Mises stress before and after bone cement reinforcement.

RESULTS

The study found that stress distribution differed between groups mainly at the pedicle base. In the surgical vertebral bodies, the maximum stress in the PVP group decreased during flexion and left bending, while it increased in other states. In the PVCPP group, all maximum stresses decreased. In the inferior vertebral bodies, the maximum stress in the PVP group generally increased, while it decreased in the PVCPP group. In the superior vertebral bodies, postoperatively, the maximum stress in the PVP group generally increased, while it almost remained unchanged in the PVCPP group. PVP group had higher cement stress and displacement.

CONCLUSION

PVCPP is an effective treatment method for patients with unstable OVFs. It can quickly relieve pain and enhance the stability of the three columns, thereby reducing the risk of some complications.

The effect of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation on the primary stability of stand-alone implant construct versus posterior stabilization in oblique lumbar interbody fusion with osteoporotic bone quality- a finite element study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) can provide an ideal minimally invasive solution for achieving spinal fusion in an older, more frail population where decreased bone quality can be a limiting factor. Stabilization can be achieved with bilateral pedicle screws (BPS), which require additional incisions and longer operative time. Alternatively, a novel self-anchoring stand-alone lateral plate system (SSA) can be used, where no additional incisions are required. Based on the relevant literature, BPS constructs provide greater primary biomechanical stability compared to lateral plate constructs, including SSA. This difference is further increased by osteoporosis. Screw augmentation in spinal fusion surgeries is commonly used; however, in the case of OLIF, it is a fairly new concept, lacking a consensus-based guideline.

PURPOSE

This comparative finite element (FE) study aimed to investigate the effect of PMMA screw augmentation on the primary stability of a stand-alone implant construct versus posterior stabilization in OLIF with osteoporotic bone quality.

STUDY DESIGN

The biomechanical effect of screw augmentation was studied inside an in-silico environment using computer-aided FE analysis.

METHODS

A previously validated and published L2-L4 FE model with normal and osteoporotic bone material properties was used. Geometries based on the OLIF implants (BPS, SSA) were created and placed inside the L3-L4 motion segment with increasing volumes (1-6 cm3) of PMMA augmentation. A follower load of 400 N and 10 Nm bending moment (in the three anatomical planes) were applied to the surgical FE models with different bone material properties. The operated L3-L4 segmental range of motion (ROM), the inserted cage's maximal caudal displacements, and L4 cranial bony endplate principal stress values were measured.

RESULTS

The nonaugmented values for the BPS construct were generally lower compared to SSA, and the difference was increased by osteoporosis. In osteoporotic bone, PMMA augmentation gradually decreased the investigated parameters and the difference between the two constructs as well. Between 3 cm3 and 4 cm3 of injected PMMA volume per screw, the difference between augmented SSA and standard BPS became comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, augmentation can enhance the primary stability of the constructs and decrease the difference between them. Considering leakage as a possible complication, between 3 cm3 and 4 cm3 of injected PMMA per screw can be an adequate amount for SSA augmentation. However, further in silico, and possibly in vitro and clinical testing is required to thoroughly understand the investigated biomechanical aspects.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study sheds light on the possible biomechanical advantage offered by augmented OLIF implants and provides a theoretical augmentation amount for the SSA construct. Based on the findings, the concept of an SSA device with PMMA augmentation capability is desirable.

Static study and numerical simulation of the influence of cement distribution in the upper and lower adjacent vertebrae on sandwich vertebrae in osteoporotic patients: Finite element analysis

Objective

We analyzed the influence of the location of the upper and lower cement on the sandwich vertebrae (SV) by computer finite element analysis.

Materials and Methods

A finite element model of the spinal segment of T11-L1 was constructed and 6 mL of cement was built into T11 and L1 simultaneously. According to the various distributions of bone cement at T11 and L1, the following four groups were formed: (i) Group B-B: bilateral bone cement reinforcement in both T11 and L1 vertebral bodies; (ii) Group L-B: left unilateral reinforcement in T11 and bilateral reinforcement in L1; (iii) Group L-R: unilateral cement reinforcement in both T11 and L1 (cross); (iv) Group L-L: unilateral cement reinforcement in both T11 and L1 (ipsilateral side). The maximum von Mises stress (VMS) and maximum displacement of the SV and intervertebral discs were compared and analyzed.

Results

The maximum VMS of T12 was in the order of size: group B-B < L-B < L-R < L-L. Group B-B showed the lowest maximum VMS values for T12: 19.13, 18.86, 25.17, 25.01, 19.24, and 20.08 MPa in six directions of load flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and right rotation, respectively, while group L-L was the largest VMS in each group, with the maximum VMS in six directions of 21.55, 21.54, 30.17, 28.33, 19.88, and 25.27 MPa, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with the uneven distribution of bone cement in the upper and lower adjacent vertebrae (ULAV), the uniform distribution of bone cement in the ULAV reduced and uniformed the stress load on the SV and intervertebral disc. Theoretically, it can lead to the lowest incidence of sandwich vertebral fracture and the slowest rate of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Biomechanical study of different bone cement distribution on osteoporotic vertebral compression Fracture-A finite element analysis

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the biomechanical effects of different bone cement distribution methods on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF).

Patients and methods

Raw CT data from a healthy male volunteer was used to create a finite element model of the T12-L2 vertebra using finite element software. A compression fracture was simulated in the L1 vertebra, and two forms of bone cement dispersion (integration group, IG, and separation group, SG) were also simulated. Six types of loading (flexion, extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation) were applied to the models, and the stress distribution in the vertebra and intervertebral discs was observed. Additionally, the maximum displacement of the L1 vertebra was evaluated.

Results

Bone cement injection significantly reduced stress following L1 vertebral fractures. In the L1 vertebral body, the maximum stress of SG was lower than that of IG during flexion, left/right bending, and left/right rotation. In the T12 vertebral body, compared with IG, the maximum stress of SG decreased during flexion and right rotation. In the L2 vertebral body, the maximum stress of SG was the lowest under all loading conditions. In the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, compared with IG, the maximum stress of SG decreased during flexion, extension, and left/right bending and was basically the same during left/right rotation. However, in the L1-L2 intervertebral discs, the maximum stress of SG increased during left/right rotation compared with that of IG. Furthermore, the maximum displacement of SG was smaller than that of IG in the L1 vertebral bodies under all loading conditions.

Conclusions

SG can reduce the maximum stress in the vertebra and intervertebral discs, offering better biomechanical performance and improved stability than IG.

Biomechanical evaluation of different oblique lumbar interbody fusion constructs: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to investigate the biomechanical differences between different adjunct fixation methods for oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and to further analyze its effect on adjacent segmental degeneration.

METHODS

We built a single-segment (Si-segment) finite element model (FEM) for L4-5 and a double-segment (Do-segment) FEM for L3-5. Each complete FEM was supplemented and modified, and both developed two surgical models of OLIF with assisted internal fixation. They were OLIF with posterior bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw (TINA system) fixation (OLIF + BPS) and OLIF with lateral plate system (OLIF + LPS). The range of motion (ROM) and displacement of the vertebral body, cage stress, adjacent segment disc stress, and spinal ligament tension were recorded for the four models during flexion/extension, right/left bending, and right/left rotation by applying follower load.

RESULTS

For the BPS and LPS systems in the six postures of flexion, extension, right/left bending, and right/left rotation, the ROM of L4 in the Si-segment FEM were 0.32°/1.83°, 0.33°/1.34°, 0.23°/0.47°, 0.24°/0.45°, 0.33°/0.79°, and 0.34°/0.62°; the ROM of L4 in the Do-segment FEM were 0.39°/2.00°, 0.37°/1.38°, 0.23°/0.47°, 0.21°/0.44°, 0.33°/0.57°, and 0.31°/0.62°, and the ROM of L3 in the Do-segment FEM were 6.03°/7.31°, 2.52°/3.50°, 4.21°/4.38°, 4.21°/4.42°, 2.09°/2.32°, and 2.07°/2.43°. BPS system had less vertebral displacement, less cage maximum stress, and less spinal ligament tension in Si/Do-segment FEM relative to the LPS system. BPS system had a smaller upper adjacent vertebral ROM, greater intervertebral disc stress in terms of left and right bending as well as left and right rotation compared to the LPS system in the L3-4 of the Do-segment FEM. There was little biomechanical difference between the same fixation system in the Si/Do-segment FEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finite element analysis showed that compared to OLIF + LPS, OLIF + BPS (TINA) is more effective in reducing interbody stress and spinal ligament tension, and it better maintains the stability of the target segment and provides a better fusion environment to resist cage subsidence. However, OLIF + BPS (TINA) may be more likely to cause adjacent segment degeneration than OLIF + LPS.

A comparative analysis of using cage acrossing the vertebral ring apophysis in normal and osteoporotic models under endplate injury: a finite element analysis

Background: Lateral lumbar fusion is an advanced, minimally invasive treatment for degenerative lumbar diseases. It involves different cage designs, primarily varying in size. This study aims to investigate the biomechanics of the long cage spanning the ring apophysis in both normal and osteoporotic models, considering endplate damage, using finite element analysis. Methods: Model 1 was an intact endplate with a long cage spanning the ring apophysis. Model 2 was an endplate decortication with a long cage spanning the ring apophysis. Model 3 was an intact endplate with a short cage. Model 4 was an endplate decortication with a short cage. On the basis of the four original models, further osteoporosis models were created, yielding a total of eight finite element models. The provided passage delineates a study that elucidates the utilization of finite element analysis as a methodology to simulate and analyze the biomechanical repercussions ensuing from the adoption of two distinct types of intervertebral fusion devices (cages) within the physiological framework of a human body. Results: The investigation found no appreciable changes between Models 1 and 2 in the range of motion at the fixed and neighboring segments, the L3-4 IDP, screw-rod stress, endplate stress, or stress on the trabecular bone of the L5. Increases in these stresses were seen in models 3 and 4 in the ranges of 0.4%-676.1%, 252.9%-526.9%, 27.3%-516.6%, and 11.4%-109.3%, respectively. The osteoporotic models for scenarios 3 and 4 exhibit a similar trend to their respective normal bone density models, but these osteoporotic models consistently have higher numerical values. In particular, except for L3-4 IDP, the maximum values of these parameters in osteoporotic Models 3 and 4 were much higher than those in normal bone quality Models 1 and 2, rising by 385.3%, 116%, 435.1%, 758.3%, and 786.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Regardless of endplate injury or osteoporosis, it is advised to utilize a long cage that is 5 mm longer on each side than the bilateral pedicles because it has good biomechanical features and may lower the likelihood of problems after surgery. Additionally, using Long cages in individuals with osteoporosis may help avoid adjacent segment disease.

Effectiveness of Teriparatide for Spine Fusion in Osteoporotic Patient: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to assess teriparatide's (TP) effectiveness in improving radiographic and functional outcomes after spinal fusion surgery. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies. The findings provide valuable insights and guidance for surgeons treating osteoporotic patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to assess TP's efficacy in spinal fusion surgery for osteoporosis. Through thorough selection, data extraction, and quality assessment, we employed network meta-analysis to evaluate radiographic outcomes (fusion rate, screw loosening, vertebral fracture) and changes in bone mineral density measured by Hounsfield units. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index scales. Our study aims to comprehensively understand TP's impact and effectiveness in spinal fusion surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 868 patients were included in the analysis. All patients underwent thoracolumbar internal fixation fusion surgery and were divided into following 2 groups: the TP treatment group and the control group. The results revealed significant differences in radiological outcomes. The fusion rate showed a significant difference, as well as screw loosening, and bone mineral density measured in Hounsfield units. However, there was no significant difference in vertebral fracture. The TP group demonstrated favorable effects with statistical significance. In terms of functional outcomes, there was no significant difference in the assessment of Oswestry Disability Index scores between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis demonstrated that the TP group exhibited significantly better outcomes, particularly in radiological measures, when compared to the control group. The use of TP in spinal fusion surgery shows promise in reducing postoperative complications and providing overall benefits.

Biomechanical analysis of sandwich vertebrae in osteoporotic patients: finite element analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical stress of sandwich vertebrae (SVs) and common adjacent vertebrae in different degrees of spinal mobility in daily life.

Materials and methods

A finite element model of the spinal segment of T10-L2 was developed and validated. Simultaneously, T11 and L1 fractures were simulated, and a 6-ml bone cement was constructed in their center. Under the condition of applying a 500-N axial load to the upper surface of T10 and immobilizing the lower surface of L2, moments were applied to the upper surface of T10, T11, T12, L1, and L2 and divided into five groups: M-T10, M-T11, M-T12, M-L1, and M-L2. The maximum von Mises stress of T10, T12, and L2 in different groups was calculated and analyzed.

Results

The maximum von Mises stress of T10 in the M-T10 group was 30.68 MPa, 36.13 MPa, 34.27 MPa, 33.43 MPa, 26.86 MPa, and 27.70 MPa greater than the maximum stress value of T10 in the other groups in six directions of load flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and right rotation, respectively. The T12 stress value in the M-T12 group was 29.62 MPa, 32.63 MPa, 30.03 MPa, 31.25 MPa, 26.38 MPa, and 26.25 MPa greater than the T12 stress value in the other groups in six directions. The maximum stress of L2 in M-T12 in the M-L2 group was 25.48 MPa, 36.38 MPa, 31.99 MPa, 31.07 MPa, 30.36 MPa, and 32.07 MPa, which was greater than the stress value of L2 in the other groups. When the load is on which vertebral body, it is subjected to the greatest stress.

Conclusion

We found that SVs did not always experience the highest stress. The most stressed vertebrae vary with the degree of curvature of the spine. Patients should be encouraged to avoid the same spinal curvature posture for a long time in life and work or to wear a spinal brace for protection after surgery, which can avoid long-term overload on a specific spine and disrupt its blood supply, resulting in more severe loss of spinal quality and increasing the possibility of fractures.

Biomechanical stability of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with four types of internal fixations: finite element analysis

Objective: Using finite element analysis to identify the optimal internal fixation method for oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), providing guidance for clinical practice. Methods: A finite element model of the L4 - L5 segment was created. Five types of internal fixations were simulated in the generated L4-L5 finite element (FE) model. Then, six loading scenarios, i.e., flexion, extension, left-leaning, right-leaning, rotate left, and rotate right, were simulated in the FE models with different types of fixations. The biomechanical stability of the spinal segment after different fixations was investigated. Results: Regarding the range of motion (ROM) of the fused segment, OLIF + Bilateral Pedicle Screws (BPS) has a maximum ROM of 1.82° during backward bending and the smallest ROM in all directions of motion compared with other models. In terms of the von Mises stress distribution on the cage, the average stress on every motion direction of OLIF + BPS is about 17.08MPa, and of OLIF + Unilateral Vertebral Screw - Pedicle Screw (UVS-PS) is about 19.29 MPa. As for the von Mises stress distribution on the internal fixation, OLIF + BPS has the maximum internal fixator stress in left rotation (31.85 MPa) and OLIF + Unilateral Pedicle Screw (UPS) has the maximum internal fixator stress in posterior extension (76.59 MPa). The data of these two models were smaller than those of other models. Conclusion: OLIF + BPS provides the greatest biomechanical stability, OLIF + UPS has adequate biomechanical stability, OLIF + UVS-PS is inferior to OLIF + UPS synthetically, and OLIF + Double row vertical screw (DRVS) and Individual OLIF (IO) do not present significant obvious advantages.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Rigid Interspinous Process Fixation Combined With Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Hybrid Testing Protocol

Rigid interspinous process fixation (RIPF) has been recently discussed as an alternative to pedicle screw fixation (PSF) for reducing trauma in lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) surgery. This study aimed to investigate biomechanics of the lumbar spine with RIPF, and also to compare biomechanical differences between two postoperative stages (before and after bony fusion). Based on an intact finite-element model of lumbosacral spine, the models of single-level LIF with RIPF or conventional PSF were developed and were computed for biomechanical responses to the moments of four physiological motions using hybrid testing protocol. It was found that compared with PSF, range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and facet joint forces (FJF) at adjacent segments of the surgical level for RIPF were decreased by up to 8.4%, 2.3%, and 16.8%, respectively, but ROM and endplate stress at the surgical segment were increased by up to 285.3% and 174.3%, respectively. The results of comparison between lumbar spine with RIPF before and after bony fusion showed that ROM and endplate stress at the surgical segment were decreased by up to 62.6% and 40.4%, respectively, when achieved to bony fusion. These findings suggest that lumbar spine with RIPF as compared to PSF has potential to decrease the risk of adjacent segment degeneration but might have lower stability of surgical segment and an increased risk of cage subsidence; When achieved bony fusion, it might be helpful for the lumbar spine with RIPF in increasing stability of surgical segment and reducing failure of bone contact with cage.

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with stress end plate augmentation and anterolateral screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with osteoporosis: a matched-pair case-controlled study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has been proven to be effective in treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Whether OLIF is suitable for treating patients with DLSS with osteoporosis (OP) is still controversial. Bone cement augmentation is widely used to enhance the internal fixation strength of osteoporotic spines. However, the effectiveness of OLIF combined with bone cement stress end plate augmentation (SEA) and anterolateral screw fixation (AF) for DLSS with OP have not confirmed yet.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of OLIF-AF versus OLIF-AF-SEA in the treatment of DLSS with OP.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 60 patients with OP managed for DLSS at L4-L5.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog scale (VAS) score of the lower back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disk height (DH), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), cage subsidence and fusion rate.

METHODS

The study was performed as a retrospective matched-pair case‒controlled study. Patients with OP managed for DLSS at L4-L5 between October 2017 and June 2020 and completed at least 2 years of follow-up were included, which were 30 patients treated by OLIF-AF and 30 patients undergoing OLIF-AF-SEA. The demographics and radiographic data, fusion status and functional outcomes were therefore compared to evaluate the efficacy of the two approaches.

RESULTS

Pain and disability improved similarly in both groups at the 24-month follow-up. However, the SEA group had lower pain and functional disability at 3 months postoperatively (p<.05). The mean postoperative disc height decrease (△DH) was significantly lower in the SEA group than in the control group (1.17±0.81 mm vs 2.89±2.03 mm; p<.001). There was no significant difference in lumbar lordosis (LL) or segmental lordosis (SL) between the groups preoperatively and 1 day postoperatively. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in SL and LL between the groups at 24 months postoperatively (p<.05). CS was observed in 4 cases (13.33%) in the SEA group and 17 cases (56.67%) in the control group (p<.001). A nonsignificant difference was observed in the fusion rate between the SEA and control groups (p=.347) at 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that OLIF-AF-SEA was safe and effective in the treatment of DLSS with OP. Compared with OLIF-AF, OLIF-AF-SEA results in a minor postoperative disc height decrease, a lower rate of CS, better sagittal balance, and no adverse effect on interbody fusion.

Biomechanical responses of the human lumbar spine to vertical whole-body vibration in normal and osteoporotic conditions

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of osteoporosis is continuing to escalate with an aging population. However, it remains unclear how biomechanical behavior of the lumbar spine is affected by osteoporosis under whole-body vibration, which is considered a significant risk factor for degenerative spinal disease and is typically present when driving a car. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to compare the spine biomechanical responses to vertical whole-body vibration between normal and osteoporotic conditions.

METHODS

A three-dimensional finite-element model of the normal human lumbar spine-pelvis segment was developed using computed tomographic scans and was validated against experimental data. Osteoporotic condition was simulated by modifying material properties of bone tissues in the normal model. Transient dynamic analyses were conducted on the normal and osteoporotic models to compute deformation and stress in all lumbar motion segments.

FINDINGS

When osteoporosis occurred, vibration amplitudes of the vertebral axial displacement, disc bulge, and disc stress were increased by 32.1-45.4%, 25.7-47.1% and 23.0-42.7%, respectively. In addition, it was found that for both the normal and osteoporotic models, the response values (disc bugle and disc stress) were higher in L4-L5 and L5-S1 intervertebral discs than in other discs.

INTERPRETATION

Osteoporosis deteriorates the effect of whole-body vibration on lumbar spine, and the lower lumbar segments might have a higher likelihood of disc degeneration under whole-body vibration.

Different Moro Zones of Psoas Major Affect the Clinical Outcomes after Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Study of 94 Patients

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) has been driven to the maturity stage in recent years. However, postoperative symptoms such as thigh paresthesia resulting from intraoperative retraction of the psoas major (PM) have sometimes occurred. The aim of this study was to assess the different positions and morphology of PM muscles and their relationship with clinical outcomes after OLIF by introducing the Moro zones. Patients who underwent L4-5 OLIF at our institution between April 2019 and June 2021 were reviewed and all data were recorded. All patients were grouped by Moro zones into a Moro A cohort and a Moro I and II cohort based on the front edges of their left PM muscles. A total of 94 patients were recruited, including 57 in the Moro A group and 37 in the Moro I and II group. Postoperative thigh pain or numbness occurred in 12 (21.1%) and 2 (5.4%) patients in the Moro A group and the Moro I and II group, respectively. There was no difference in the psoas major transverse diameter (PMTD) between groups preoperatively, while longer PMTD was revealed postoperatively in the Moro A group. The operating window (OW) and psoas major sagittal diameter (PMSD) showed significant differences within and between groups. Thirteen patients had teardrop-shaped PM muscles, with 92.3% in the Moro A group showing significantly worse clinical scores at 1-week follow-up. The Moro zones of the PM affected the short-term outcomes after OLIF. Preoperative measurements and analysis of OW, PMSD and PM morphology should be performed as necessary to predict short-term outcomes.

Biomechanical Performances of an Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Cage in Models with Different Bone Densities: A Finite Element Analysis

Study Design

Finite element models of the L3-S1 vertebrae were reconstructed using computed tomography scans.

Objective

We compared the biomechanical performances of an oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) cage in different bone density mode.

Summary of Background Data

Low bone density is an els.key factor limiting the use of stand-alone OLIF cage.

Methods

Four models-intact (M0), normal bone density with OLIF (M1), bone mass loss with OLIF (M2), and osteoporotic with OLIF (M3)-were created based on 3-dimensional scans. Flexion, extension, and lateral bending movements (each lasting 10 N·m) were performed on the superior surface of the L3 vertebra with a compressive preload of 500 N. Range of motion (ROM), peak stresses in the L4-5 cortical endplates, cage stress, and adjacent intervertebral disk stress were evaluated.

Results

ROMs during different physiological movements were similar to those reported by previous researchers. Compared with that in M0, L4-5 ROMs of all movements decreased in M1, M2 and M3, most evidently in M3. Stress distribution in the cortical endplates rose to 7.8% in M1 and M2, even 16.2% in M3. Cage stress increased by less than 8.1% in M1 and M2, but by 25.3% in M3, especially in the movements of extension and right rotation. Compared with that in M0, L3-4 and L5-S1 intervertebral disk stress increased with bone density in all the other models, by up to 69.8% and 98.3%, respectively. As osteoporosis worsened, stress in the adjacent intervertebral disk also increased.

Conclusion

Stand-alone OLIF in M3 is not recommended because of the risk of cage subsidence. OLIF in M1 and M2 achieved similar results in various lumbar spine movements. In M1 and M2 model (T >  - 2.5), the L4-L5 showed reduced mobility in all directions, increased rigidity, limited cage displacement, lessened deformation, and better stability.

Recent advancement in finite element analysis of spinal interbody cages: A review

Finite element analysis (FEA) is a widely used tool in a variety of industries and research endeavors. With its application to spine biomechanics, FEA has contributed to a better understanding of the spine, its components, and its behavior in physiological and pathological conditions, as well as assisting in the design and application of spinal instrumentation, particularly spinal interbody cages (ICs). IC is a highly effective instrumentation for achieving spinal fusion that has been used to treat a variety of spinal disorders, including degenerative disc disease, trauma, tumor reconstruction, and scoliosis. The application of FEA lets new designs be thoroughly "tested" before a cage is even manufactured, allowing bio-mechanical responses and spinal fusion processes that cannot easily be experimented upon in vivo to be examined and "diagnosis" to be performed, which is an important addition to clinical and in vitro experimental studies. This paper reviews the recent progress of FEA in spinal ICs over the last six years. It demonstrates how modeling can aid in evaluating the biomechanical response of cage materials, cage design, and fixation devices, understanding bone formation mechanisms, comparing the benefits of various fusion techniques, and investigating the impact of pathological structures. It also summarizes the various limitations brought about by modeling simplification and looks forward to the significant advancement of spine FEA research as computing efficiency and software capabilities increase. In conclusion, in such a fast-paced field, the FEA is critical for spinal IC studies. It helps in quantitatively and visually demonstrating the cage characteristics after implanting, lowering surgeons' learning costs for new cage products, and probably assisting them in determining the best IC for patients.

Spontaneous facet joint fusion in patients following oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with lateral single screw-rod fixation: prevalence, characteristics and significance

PURPOSE

To explore the characteristics of spontaneous facet joint fusion (SFJF) in patients after oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with lateral single screw-rod fixation (OLIF-LSRF).

METHODS

We randomly selected 300 patients from 723 patients treated with OLIF-LSRF into a cross-sectional study based on the pilot study results. A novel fusion classification system was designed to evaluate the fusion status of the facet joints at three time points. Ultimately, the prevalence, characteristics, and significance of SFJF were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 265 (333 levels) qualified cases were included in our study. The novel classification for SFJF has excellent reliability (kappa > 0.75). The rate of SFJF was 15.20% (45/296 levels) at 3 months postoperatively, 31.34% (89/284 levels) at 6 months postoperatively, and 33.63% (112/333 levels) at the last follow-up. The circumferential fusion rate was 31.53% (105/333 levels) at the last follow-up. The location of SFJF was mostly on the right facet joint (P < 0.001), and the rate of SFJF increased significantly from 3 to 6 months after the operation (P < 0.001). The average age of patients with SFJF was older than that of patients without SFJF (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in Visual Analog Scale or Oswestry Disability Index scores between patients with and without SFJF.

CONCLUSION

In the OLIF-LSRF procedure, SFJF occurs mostly at 3-6 months postoperatively, especially in elderly patients and at the right facet joint. OLIF-LSRF has the potential for circumferential fusion.

Biomechanical comparison between unilateral and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A finite element analysis

Background and objective: The osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) has an incidence of 7.8/1000 person-years at 55–65 years. At 75 years or older, the incidence increases to 19.6/1000 person-years in females and 5.2–9.3/1000 person-years in males. To solve this problem, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was developed in recent years and has been widely used in clinical practice to treat OVCF. Are the clinical effects of unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (UPVP) and bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (BPVP) the same? The purpose of this study was to compare biomechanical differences between UPVP and BPVP using finite element analysis.

Materials and methods: The heterogeneous assignment finite element (FE) model of T11-L1 was constructed and validated. A compression fracture of the vertebral body was performed at T12. UPVP and BPVP were simulated by the difference in the distribution of bone cement in T12. Stress distributions and maximum von Mises stresses of vertebrae and intervertebral discs were compared. The rate of change of maximum displacement between UPVP and BPVP was evaluated.

Results: There were no obvious high-stress concentration regions on the anterior and middle columns of the T12 vertebral body in BPVP. Compared with UPVP, the maximum stress on T11 in BPVP was lower under left/right lateral bending, and the maximum stress on L1 was lower under all loading conditions. For the T12-L1 intervertebral disc, the maximum stress of BPVP was less than that of UPVP. The maximum displacement of T12 after BPVP was less than that after UPVP under the six loading conditions.

Conclusion: BPVP could balance the stress of the vertebral body, reduce the maximum stress of the intervertebral disc, and offer advantages in terms of stability compared with UPVP. In summary, BPVP could reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and provide promising clinical effects for patients.

Effects of osteoporosis on the biomechanics of various supplemental fixations co-applied with oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF): a finite element analysis

Background

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is an important surgical modality for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease. Various supplemental fixations can be co-applied with OLIF, increasing OLIF stability and reducing complications. However, it is unclear whether osteoporosis affects the success of supplemental fixations; therefore, this study analyzed the effects of osteoporosis on various supplemental fixations co-applied with OLIF.

Methods

We developed and validated an L3-S1 finite element (FE) model; we assigned different material properties to each component and established models of the osteoporotic and normal bone lumbar spine. We explored the outcomes of OLIF combined with each of five supplemental fixations: standalone OLIF; OLIF with lateral plate fixation (OLIF + LPF); OLIF with translaminar facet joint fixation and unilateral pedicle screw fixation (OLIF + TFJF + UPSF); OLIF with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (OLIF + UPSF); and OLIF with bilateral pedicle screw fixation (OLIF + BPSF). Under the various working conditions, we calculated the ranges of motion (ROMs) of the normal bone and osteoporosis models, the maximum Mises stresses of the fixation instruments (MMSFIs), and the average Mises stresses on cancellous bone (AMSCBs).

Results

Compared with the normal bone OLIF model, no demonstrable change in any segmental ROM was apparent. The MMSFIs increased in all five osteoporotic OLIF models. In the OLIF + TFJF + UPSF model, the MMSFIs increased sharply in forward flexion and extension. The stress changes of the OLIF + UPSF, OLIF + BPSF, and OLIF + TFJF + UPSF models were similar; all stresses trended upward. The AMSCBs decreased in all five osteoporotic OLIF models during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The average stress change of cancellous bone was most obvious under extension. The AMSCBs of the five OLIF models decreased by 14%, 23.44%, 21.97%, 40.56%, and 22.44% respectively.

Conclusions

For some supplemental fixations, the AMSCBs were all reduced and the MMSFIs were all increased in the osteoporotic model, compared with the OLIF model of normal bone. Therefore, the biomechanical performance of an osteoporotic model may be inferior to the biomechanical performance of a normal model for the same fixation method; in some instances, it may increase the risks of fracture and internal fixation failure.

Novel force-displacement control passive finite element models of the spine to simulate intact and pathological conditions; comparisons with traditional passive and detailed musculoskeletal models

Passive finite element (FE) models of the spine are commonly used to simulate intact and various pre- and postoperative pathological conditions. Being devoid of muscles, these traditional models are driven by simplistic loading scenarios, e.g., a constant moment and compressive follower load (FL) that do not properly mimic the complex in vivo loading condition under muscle exertions. We aim to develop novel passive FE models that are driven by more realistic yet simple loading scenarios, i.e., in vivo vertebral rotations and pathological-condition dependent FLs (estimated based on detailed musculoskeletal finite element (MS-FE) models). In these novel force-displacement control FE models, unlike the traditional passive FE models, FLs vary not only at different spine segments (T12-S1) but between intact, pre- and postoperative conditions. Intact, preoperative degenerated, and postoperative fused conditions at the L4-L5 segment for five static in vivo activities in upright and flexed postures were simulated by the traditional passive FE, novel force-displacement control FE, and gold-standard detailed MS-FE spine models. Our findings indicate that, when compared to the MS-FE models, the force-displacement control passive FE models could accurately predict the magnitude of disc compression force, intradiscal pressure, annulus maximal von Mises stress, and vector sum of all ligament forces at adjacent segments (L3-L4 and L5-S1) but failed to predict disc shear and facet joint forces. In this regard, the force-displacement control passive FE models were much more accurate than the traditional passive FE models. Clinical recommendations made based on traditional passive FE models should, therefore, be interpreted with caution.