1
|
Generalova AN, Vikhrov AA, Prostyakova AI, Apresyan SV, Stepanov AG, Myasoedov MS, Oleinikov VA. Polymers in 3D printing of external maxillofacial prostheses and in their retention systems. Int J Pharm 2024; 657:124181. [PMID: 38697583 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Maxillofacial defects, arising from trauma, oncological disease or congenital abnormalities, detrimentally affect daily life. Prosthetic repair offers the aesthetic and functional reconstruction with the help of materials mimicking natural tissues. 3D polymer printing enables the design of patient-specific prostheses with high structural complexity, as well as rapid and low-cost fabrication on-demand. However, 3D printing for prosthetics is still in the early stage of development and faces various challenges for widespread use. This is because the most suitable polymers for maxillofacial restoration are soft materials that do not have the required printability, mechanical strength of the printed parts, as well as functionality. This review focuses on the challenges and opportunities of 3D printing techniques for production of polymer maxillofacial prostheses using computer-aided design and modeling software. Review discusses the widely used polymers, as well as their blends and composites, which meet the most important assessment criteria, such as the physicochemical, biological, aesthetic properties and processability in 3D printing. In addition, strategies for improving the polymer properties, such as their printability, mechanical strength, and their ability to print multimaterial and architectural structures are highlighted. The current state of the prosthetic retention system is presented with a focus on actively used polymer adhesives and the recently implemented prosthesis-supporting osseointegrated implants, with an emphasis on their creation from 3D-printed polymers. The successful prosthetics is discussed in terms of the specificity of polymer materials at the restoration site. The approaches and technological prospects are also explored through the examples of the nasal, auricle and ocular prostheses, ranging from prototypes to end-use products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alla N Generalova
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia; Federal Scientific Research Center "Crystallography and Photonics" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia.
| | - Alexander A Vikhrov
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna I Prostyakova
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Samvel V Apresyan
- Institute of Digital Dentistry, Medical Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya 6, 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander G Stepanov
- Institute of Digital Dentistry, Medical Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya 6, 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Maxim S Myasoedov
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir A Oleinikov
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cai B, Kilian D, Ramos Mejia D, Rios RJ, Ali A, Heilshorn SC. Diffusion-Based 3D Bioprinting Strategies. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 11:e2306470. [PMID: 38145962 PMCID: PMC10885663 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202306470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
3D bioprinting has enabled the fabrication of tissue-mimetic constructs with freeform designs that include living cells. In the development of new bioprinting techniques, the controlled use of diffusion has become an emerging strategy to tailor the properties and geometry of printed constructs. Specifically, the diffusion of molecules with specialized functions, including crosslinkers, catalysts, growth factors, or viscosity-modulating agents, across the interface of printed constructs will directly affect material properties such as microstructure, stiffness, and biochemistry, all of which can impact cell phenotype. For example, diffusion-induced gelation is employed to generate constructs with multiple materials, dynamic mechanical properties, and perfusable geometries. In general, these diffusion-based bioprinting strategies can be categorized into those based on inward diffusion (i.e., into the printed ink from the surrounding air, solution, or support bath), outward diffusion (i.e., from the printed ink into the surroundings), or diffusion within the printed construct (i.e., from one zone to another). This review provides an overview of recent advances in diffusion-based bioprinting strategies, discusses emerging methods to characterize and predict diffusion in bioprinting, and highlights promising next steps in applying diffusion-based strategies to overcome current limitations in biofabrication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betty Cai
- Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University476 Lomita MallStanfordCA94305USA
| | - David Kilian
- Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University476 Lomita MallStanfordCA94305USA
| | - Daniel Ramos Mejia
- Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University476 Lomita MallStanfordCA94305USA
| | - Ricardo J. Rios
- Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University476 Lomita MallStanfordCA94305USA
| | - Ashal Ali
- Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University476 Lomita MallStanfordCA94305USA
| | - Sarah C. Heilshorn
- Department of Materials Science and EngineeringStanford University476 Lomita MallStanfordCA94305USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trifanova EM, Babayeva G, Khvorostina MA, Atanova AV, Nikolaeva ME, Sochilina AV, Khaydukov EV, Popov VK. Photoluminescent Scaffolds Based on Natural and Synthetic Biodegradable Polymers for Bioimaging and Tissue Engineering. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13040870. [PMID: 37109400 PMCID: PMC10141962 DOI: 10.3390/life13040870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive visualization and monitoring of tissue-engineered structures in a living organism is a challenge. One possible solution to this problem is to use upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) as photoluminescent nanomarkers in scaffolds. We synthesized and studied scaffolds based on natural (collagen-COL and hyaluronic acid-HA) and synthetic (polylactic-co-glycolic acids-PLGA) polymers loaded with β-NaYF4:Yb3+, Er3+ nanocrystals (21 ± 6 nm). Histomorphological analysis of tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of the polymer scaffolds in BALB/c mice was performed. The inflammatory response of the surrounding tissues was found to be weak for scaffolds based on HA and PLGA and moderate for COL scaffolds. An epi-luminescent imaging system with 975 nm laser excitation was used for in vivo visualization and photoluminescent analysis of implanted scaffolds. We demonstrated that the UCNPs' photoluminescent signal monotonously decreased in all the examined scaffolds, indicating their gradual biodegradation followed by the release of photoluminescent nanoparticles into the surrounding tissues. In general, the data obtained from the photoluminescent analysis correlated satisfactorily with the histomorphological analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina M Trifanova
- Federal Scientific Research Centre "Crystallography and Photonics" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
| | - Gulalek Babayeva
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia, 115478 Moscow, Russia
- Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, RUDN University, 117198 Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria A Khvorostina
- Federal Scientific Research Centre "Crystallography and Photonics" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
- Research Centre for Medical Genetics, 115478 Moscow, Russia
| | - Aleksandra V Atanova
- Federal Scientific Research Centre "Crystallography and Photonics" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria E Nikolaeva
- Institute of Physics, Technology, and Informational Systems, Moscow State Pedagogical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia V Sochilina
- Federal Scientific Research Centre "Crystallography and Photonics" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
- Institute of Physics, Technology, and Informational Systems, Moscow State Pedagogical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Shemyakin & Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Evgeny V Khaydukov
- Federal Scientific Research Centre "Crystallography and Photonics" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
- Institute of Physics, Technology, and Informational Systems, Moscow State Pedagogical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir K Popov
- Federal Scientific Research Centre "Crystallography and Photonics" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mishchenko TA, Klimenko MO, Kuznetsova AI, Yarkov RS, Savelyev AG, Sochilina AV, Mariyanats AO, Popov VK, Khaydukov EV, Zvyagin AV, Vedunova MV. 3D-printed hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds impregnated with neurotrophic factors (BDNF, GDNF) for post-traumatic brain tissue reconstruction. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:895406. [PMID: 36091441 PMCID: PMC9453866 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.895406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain tissue reconstruction posttraumatic injury remains a long-standing challenge in neurotransplantology, where a tissue-engineering construct (scaffold, SC) with specific biochemical properties is deemed the most essential building block. Such three-dimensional (3D) hydrogel scaffolds can be formed using brain-abundant endogenous hyaluronic acid modified with glycidyl methacrylate by employing our proprietary photopolymerisation technique. Herein, we produced 3D hyaluronic scaffolds impregnated with neurotrophic factors (BDNF, GDNF) possessing 600 kPa Young’s moduli and 336% swelling ratios. Stringent in vitro testing of fabricated scaffolds using primary hippocampal cultures revealed lack of significant cytotoxicity: the number of viable cells in the SC+BDNF (91.67 ± 1.08%) and SC+GDNF (88.69 ± 1.2%) groups was comparable to the sham values (p > 0.05). Interestingly, BDNF-loaded scaffolds promoted the stimulation of neuronal process outgrowth during the first 3 days of cultures development (day 1: 23.34 ± 1.46 µm; day 3: 37.26 ± 1.98 µm, p < 0.05, vs. sham), whereas GDNF-loaded scaffolds increased the functional activity of neuron-glial networks of cultures at later stages of cultivation (day 14) manifested in a 1.3-fold decrease in the duration coupled with a 2.4-fold increase in the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations (p < 0.05, vs. sham). In vivo studies were carried out using C57BL/6 mice with induced traumatic brain injury, followed by surgery augmented with scaffold implantation. We found positive dynamics of the morphological changes in the treated nerve tissue in the post-traumatic period, where the GDNF-loaded scaffolds indicated more favorable regenerative potential. In comparison with controls, the physiological state of the treated mice was improved manifested by the absence of severe neurological deficit, significant changes in motor and orienting-exploratory activity, and preservation of the ability to learn and retain long-term memory. Our results suggest in favor of biocompatibility of GDNF-loaded scaffolds, which provide a platform for personalized brain implants stimulating effective morphological and functional recovery of nerve tissue after traumatic brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana A. Mishchenko
- Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Maria O. Klimenko
- Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Alisa I. Kuznetsova
- Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Roman S. Yarkov
- Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - Alexander G. Savelyev
- Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk-Moscow, Russia
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia V. Sochilina
- Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk-Moscow, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry RAS, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexandra O. Mariyanats
- Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk-Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir K. Popov
- Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk-Moscow, Russia
| | - Evgeny V. Khaydukov
- Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk-Moscow, Russia
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry RAS, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrei V. Zvyagin
- Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- MQ Photonics Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maria V. Vedunova
- Institute of Biology and Biomedicine, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
- *Correspondence: Maria V. Vedunova,
| |
Collapse
|