Clinical Application and Influencing Factor Analysis of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in ICU Patients With Sepsis

Use of pus metagenomic next-generation sequencing for efficient identification of pathogens in patients with sepsis

The positive detection rate of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was still too low to meet clinical needs, while pus from the site of primary infection may be advantageous for identification of pathogens. To assess the value of mNGS using pus in patients with sepsis, thirty-five samples were collected. Pathogen identification and mixed infection diagnosis obtained by use of mNGS or cultivation methods were compared. Fifty-three aerobic or facultative anaerobes, 59 obligate anaerobes and 7 fungi were identified by the two methods. mNGS increased the accuracy rate of diagnosing aerobic or facultative anaerobic infections from 44.4% to 94.4%; mNGS also increased the sensitivity of diagnosing obligate anaerobic infections from 52.9% to 100.0%; however, mNGS did not show any advantage in terms of fungal infections. Culture and mNGS identified 1 and 24 patients with mixed infection, respectively. For obligate anaerobes, source of microorganisms was analyzed. The odontogenic bacteria all caused empyema (n = 7) or skin and soft tissue infections (n = 5), whereas the gut-derived microbes all caused intra-abdominal infections (n = 7). We also compared the clinical characteristics of non-obligate anaerobic and obligate anaerobic infection groups. The SOFA score [9.0 (7.5, 14.3) vs. 5.0 (3.0, 8.0), P = 0.005], procalcitonin value [4.7 (1.8, 39.9) vs. 2.50 (0.7, 8.0), P = 0.035], the proportion of septic shock (66.7% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.044) and acute liver injury (66.7% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.018) in the non-obligate anaerobic infection group were significantly higher than those in the obligate anaerobic infection group. In patients with sepsis caused by purulent infection, mNGS using pus from the primary lesion may yield more valuable microbiological information.

Diagnostic value and clinical use of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) with traditional fungal culture, (1,3)-β-D glucan (G) test, and galactomannan (GM) test in diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and to explore the advantages and disadvantages of mNGS for IPA diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 136 patients admitted to the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from March 2018 to March 2020. Among them, there were 66 patients with IPA (IPA group) and 70 without (non-IPA group). Baseline data, inflammatory factors, cytokines, and specimens such as bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood of these patients were collected. Fungal culture test, G test, GM test and mNGS test were performed. Information included for analysis encompassed patients' host factors, clinical features, chest scanning images, laboratory test results, and treatment outcome.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the baseline data or inflammatory factors in patients between the IPA group and the non-IPA group. Further analysis showed that the sensitivity of mNGS in diagnosing IPA was 53.03%, which was higher than that of traditional fungal culture test (27.27%), G test (31.82%), and GM test (34.85%). Notably, when combining fungal culture, G test, GM test, and mNGS, the sensitivity increased to 69.70%, with a specificity of 97.14%. The sensitivity of the combined test was higher than that any of the tests alone for diagnosing IPA.

CONCLUSION

mNGS test offers superior diagnostic performance for IPA in comparison to traditional tests, particularly for testing samples like bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and bronchial secretions. The test result remains valuable even after aspergillus treatment. In addition, the use of mNGS in conjunction with other traditional tests, such as fungal culture test, G test, and GM test, can enhance the diagnostic efficacy for IPA.

Spinal Infections? mNGS Combined with Microculture and Pathology for Answers

Introduction

This study evaluates the efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing spinal infections and developing therapeutic regimens that combine mNGS, microbiological cultures, and pathological investigations.

Methods

Data were collected from 108 patients with suspected spinal infections between January 2022 and December 2023. Lesion tissues were obtained via C-arm assisted puncture or open surgery for mNGS, conventional microbiological culture, and pathological analysis. Personalized antimicrobial therapies were tailored based on these findings, with follow-up evaluations 7 days postoperatively. The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS were assessed, along with its impact on treatment and prognosis.

Results

mNGS showed a significantly higher positive detection rate (61.20%) compared to conventional microbiological culture (30.80%) and PCT (28%). mNGS demonstrated greater sensitivity (79.41%) and negative predictive value (63.16%) than cultures (25% and 22.58%, respectively), with no significant difference in specificity and positive predictive value. Seven days post-surgery, a significant reduction in neutrophil percentage (NEUT%) was observed, though decreases in white blood cell count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were not statistically significant. At the last follow-up, significant improved in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were noted.

Conclusion

mNGS outperforms traditional microbiological culture in pathogen detection, especially for rare and critical pathogens. Treatment protocols combining mNGS, microbiological cultures, and pathological examinations are effective and provide valuable clinical insights for treating spinal infections.

Torquetenovirus from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid as a biomarker for lung infection among immunocompromised hosts

Aim: Torquetenovirus (TTV) was a promising biomarker for immunity, while lung regional TTV for evaluating the opportunistic infection among immunocompromised hosts (ICH) was unclear.Materials & methods: In the ICH and non-ICH populations, we compared the susceptibility to opportunistic infections, clinical severity and the prognosis between subgroups, respectively.Results: ICH with detectable bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-TTV were more susceptible to lung aspergillosis and Mycobacterium infections. Furthermore, our data demonstrated that the ICH cohort with detectable BALF-TTV represented a higher clinical severity and a worse prognosis, while the above findings were not found in the non-ICH population.Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that the BALF-TTV could act as an effective predictor for opportunistic infection for ICH that complemented the CD4+ T cell counts.

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients With Suspected Infected Pancreatic Necrosis

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is no longer recommended for diagnosing infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) due to a high false-negative rate. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a valuable tool for identifying potential pathogens. We hypothesized that adding mNGS to the standard FNA procedure may increase diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single-arm feasibility study enrolling patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis complicated by suspected IPN. Computed tomography-guided FNA was performed immediately after enrollment, and the drainage samples were subjected to culture and mNGS assays simultaneously. Confirmatory IPN within the following week of the index FNA procedure was the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of FNA-mNGS and the impact of mNGS results on treatment were evaluated. Historical controls were used for comparison of clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between mNGS and culture in the positive rate (75% vs 70%, P = 0.723). The accuracy of FNA-mNGS was 80.0%, with a sensitivity of 82.35%, specificity of 66.67%, positive predictive value of 93.3%, and negative predictive value of 40.0%. The results of the mNGS led to treatment change in 16 of 20 patients (80%), including implementing percutaneous catheter drainage (n = 7), expanding antibiotic coverage (n = 2), percutaneous catheter drainage and expanding coverage (n = 4), narrowing antibiotic coverage (n = 1), and discontinuation of antibiotics (n = 2). The FNA-mNGS approach was not associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with the historical control group.

DISCUSSION

The addition of mNGS to standard FNA has comparable diagnostic accuracy with culture-based FNA and may not be associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Etiological diagnostic performance of probe capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing in bloodstream infection

Background

A rapid and precise etiological diagnosis is crucial for the effective treatment of bloodstream infection (BSI). In this study, the performance of probe capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) was compared to that of blood culture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting potential pathogens in patients with BSI.

Methods

A total of 80 patients with suspected BSI were prospectively enrolled from 24 November 2023 to 30 December 2023 at Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China. All 80 participants underwent simultaneous blood culture, blood mNGS, and blood tNGS after admission when febrile, and the results were compared.

Results

Among the 80 participants, 11 were clinically diagnosed with noninfectious fever, and 69 were diagnosed with BSI. Blood tNGS had a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of BSI than blood culture (91.3% vs. 23.2%, P<0.001) and blood mNGS (91.3% vs. 69.6%, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in specificity between blood mNGS and tNGS (81.8% vs. 100.0%, P=0.13). Blood tNGS demonstrated a faster turnaround time than blood culture and blood mNGS. In 22 (31.9%) patients with BSI, targeted adjustment of the anti-infectious therapy according to the blood tNGS results resulted in clinical improvement.

Conclusions

Blood tNGS may be a promising tool for detecting potential pathogens in patients with BSI. The application of blood tNGS for BSI could guide anti-infectious treatment strategies and might improve clinical outcomes.

The clinical importance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in detecting disease-causing microorganisms in cases of sepsis acquired in the community or hospital setting

Objectives

Although metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is commonly used for diagnosing infectious diseases, clinicians face limited options due to the high costs that are not covered by basic medical insurance. The goal of this research is to challenge this bias through a thorough examination and evaluation of the clinical importance of mNGS in precisely identifying pathogenic microorganisms in cases of sepsis acquired in the community or in hospitals.

Methods

A retrospective observational study took place at a tertiary teaching hospital in China from January to December 2021. Data on 308 sepsis patients were collected, and the performance of etiological examination was compared between mNGS and traditional culture method.

Results

Two hundred twenty-nine cases were observed in the community-acquired sepsis (CAS) group and 79 cases in the hospital-acquired sepsis (HAS) group. In comparison with conventional culture, mNGS showed a significantly higher rate of positivity in both the CAS group (88.21% vs. 25.76%, adj.P < 0.001) and the HAS group (87.34% vs. 44.30%, adj.P < 0.001), particularly across various infection sites and specimens, which were not influenced by factors like antibiotic exposure or the timing and frequency of mNGS technology. Sepsis pathogens detected by mNGS were broad, especially viruses, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and atypical pathogens, with mixed pathogens being common, particularly bacterial-viral co-detection. Based on the optimization of antimicrobial therapy using mNGS, 58 patients underwent antibiotic de-escalation, two patients were switched to antiviral therapy, and 14 patients initiated treatment for tuberculosis, resulting in a reduction in antibiotic overuse but without significant impact on sepsis prognosis. The HAS group exhibited a critical condition, poor prognosis, high medical expenses, and variations in etiology, yet the mNGS results did not result in increased medical costs for either group.

Conclusions

mNGS demonstrates efficacy in identifying multiple pathogens responsible for sepsis, with mixed pathogens of bacteria and viruses being prevalent. Variability in microbiological profiles among different infection setting underscores the importance of clinical vigilance. Therefore, the adoption of mNGS for microbiological diagnosis of sepsis warrants acknowledgment and promotion.

Higher diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in acute infection than chronic infection: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) vs. conventional culture methods (CM) in chronic infection and acute infection.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of 88 patients with acute infection and 105 patients with chronic infection admitted to three hospitals from 2017 to 2022.

Results

The results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS were higher than those of CM. The number of patients who changed the antibiotic treatment in the mNGS positive group was larger than that of patients in the mNGS negative group in both the acute infection group (60.5 vs. 28.0%, P = 0.0022) and chronic infection group (46.2 vs. 22.6%, P = 0.01112). High levels of temperature (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.18-3.70, P: 0.015), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR: 15, 95% CI: 2.74-280.69, P: 0.011), neutrophil count (OR: 3.09, 95% CI: 1.19-8.43, P: 0.023), and low levels of lymphocyte count (OR: 3.43, 95% CI:1.26-10.21, P: 0.020) may lead to positive mNGS results in the acute infection group while no significant factor was identified to predict positive results in the chronic infection group.

Conclusion

mNGS could provide useful guidance on antibiotic strategies in infectious diseases and may be more valuable for the diagnosis and treatment of acute infection vs. chronic infection.

Direct identification of pathogens via microbial cellular DNA in whole blood by MeltArray

Rapid identification of pathogens is critical for early and appropriate treatment of bloodstream infections. The various culture-independent assays that have been developed often have long turnaround times, low sensitivity and narrow pathogen coverage. Here, we propose a new multiplex PCR assay, MeltArray, which uses intact microbial cells as the source of genomic DNA (gDNA). The successive steps of the MeltArray assay, including selective lysis of human cells, microbial cell sedimentation, microbial cellular DNA extraction, target-specific pre-amplification and multiplex PCR detection, allowed the detection of 35 major bloodstream infectious pathogens in whole blood within 5.5 h. The limits of detection varied depending on the pathogen and ranged from 1 to 5 CFU/mL. Of 443 blood culture samples, including 373 positive blood culture samples and 70 negative blood culture samples, the MeltArray assay showed a sensitivity of 93.8% (350/373, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 90.7%-96.0%), specificity of 98.6% (69/70, 95% CI = 91.2%-99.9%), positive predictive value of 99.7% (95% CI = 98.1%-99.9%), and negative predictive value of 75.0% (95% CI = 64.7%-83.2%). The MeltArray detection results of 16 samples differed from MALDI-TOF and were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Further testing of 110 whole blood samples from patients with suspected bloodstream infections using blood culture results revealed that the MeltArray assay had a clinical sensitivity of 100% (9/9, 95% CI = 62.8%-100.0%), clinical specificity of 74.5% (70/94, 95% CI = 64.2%-82.7%), positive predictive value of 27.3% (95% CI = 13.9%-45.8%), and negative predictive value of 100.0% (95% CI = 93.5%-100.0%). Compared with metagenomic next-generation sequencing, the MeltArray assay displayed a positive agreement of 85.7% (6/7, 95% CI = 42.0%-99.2%) and negative agreement of 100.0% (4/4, 95% CI = 39.6%-100.0%). We conclude that the MeltArray assay can be used as a rapid and reliable tool for direct identification of pathogens in bloodstream infections.

Pathogenic Profile Characteristics and Clinical Risk Factor Analysis of Patients Who Died from Sepsis Combined with Pulmonary Infection by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing

Introduction

Sepsis is one of the major diseases that seriously threatens human health, and its incidence and in-hospital morbidity and mortality rates remain high. Applying metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology to analyze the differences in pathogenic profiles and clinical factors in patients surviving and dying from sepsis combined with pulmonary infections provides diagnostic value and application for clinical purposes.

Methods

Sixty-three BALF samples from patients with sepsis combined with pulmonary infection from Fuqing Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University were collected, and all of them were tested by simultaneous mNGS and conventional microbial combined test (CMT) to compare the pathogenic profiles and clinical indices of patients who survived and died of sepsis combined with pulmonary infection and to further compare the diagnostic differences between mNGS and CMT in patients who survived and died of sepsis combined with pulmonary infection. We analyzed the diagnostic value of mNGS for sepsis combined with pulmonary infection.

Results

A total of 141 strains of pathogens were isolated from 63 samples of patients with sepsis combined with pneumonia at suspected infection sites, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are predominant, and higher ApacheII, LAC, P and PT are all risk factors affecting the death of septic patients.

Conclusion

Applying the mNGS method to patients with sepsis combined with pneumonia can improve the positive detection rate of pathogenic microorganisms and focus on death-related risk factors such as pathogenic bacteria species as well as clinical laboratory indices, which can guide clinicians to take appropriate measures to treat patients with sepsis and reduce the occurrence of death.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Spinal Infections: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Early diagnosis of spinal infections remains challenging, and emerging metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology holds promise in addressing this issue. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of mNGS in spinal infections.

Patients and Methods

A total of 78 cases with suspected spinal infections were enrolled in this study, all of whom underwent laboratory, histopathological and mNGS examinations upon admission. Lesion samples were obtained by surgical or C-arm-guided puncture. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of culture and mNGS were calculated for statistical analysis.

Results

With histopathological results as the reference, the included 78 patients were categorized into 50 cases in the spinal infection group and 28 cases in the aseptic group. The sensitivity (84%) and negative predictive value (77.14%) of mNGS were significantly higher than those of culture (32% and 44.26%, respectively), whereas no significant differences were observed in terms of specificity and positive predictive value. In the subgroup analysis for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the sensitivity of mNGS (90.91%) and T-spot (90.91%) was significantly higher than that of culture (0). Additionally, mNGS demonstrated markedly higher specificity (100%) compared to T-spot (85.07%).

Conclusion

This study underscores the substantial advantages of mNGS in terms of diagnostic accuracy and bacterial coverage for spinal infections. The findings provide compelling clinical evidence that supports the enhanced diagnostic efficacy of mNGS.

Staphylococcus cohnii infection diagnosed by metagenomic next generation sequencing in a patient on hemodialysis with cirrhotic ascites: a case report

Background

Patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) often just receive empirical antibiotic therapy, as pathogens can be identified in only few patients using the techniques of conventional culture. Metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) is a useful tool for diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, clinical application of mNGS in diagnosis of infected ascites of cirrhotic patients is rarely reported.

Case presentation

A 53-year-old male with cirrhosis on regular hemodialysis presented with continuous abdominal pain. After treatment with empiric antibiotics, his inflammatory parameters decreased without significant relief of abdominal pain. Finally, based on ascites mNGS detection, he was diagnosed as infection of Staphylococcus cohnii (S.cohnii), a gram-positive opportunistic pathogen. With targeted antibiotic treatment, the bacterial peritonitis was greatly improved and the patient's abdominal pain was significantly alleviated.

Conclusions

When conventional laboratory diagnostic methods and empirical antibiotic therapy fail, proper application of mNGS can help identify pathogens and significantly improve prognosis and patients' symptoms.

Clinical Value of Sampling Time of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Severe Pneumonia

Objective

Severe pneumonia is a common infectious disease with high morbidity and mortality. Early etiological diagnosis is crucial for improving the prognosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical value of sampling time of mNGS in patients with severe pneumonia.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 105 patients with severe pneumonia. mNGS was performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Patients were divided into the sampling time ≤ 72h vs sampling time >72h groups and survivors vs non-survivors groups according to their sampling time and prognosis. Clinical characteristics, the adjustment of antibiotics and clinical prognostic value were evaluated.

Results

Our study showed that, early sampling of mNGS can significantly shorten the mechanical ventilation time (p = 0.007) and hospitalization time (p = 0.004). In the non-survivors group, CURB-65, SOFA, and APACHE II scores were higher. Age (OR: 1.051, 95% CI: 1.004-1.100, p = 0.034), chronic respiratory diseases (OR: 4.639, 95% CI: 1.260-17.082, p = 0.021), immunosuppression (OR: 5.008, 95% CI: 1.617-15.510, p = 0.005) and SOFA score on the day of mNGS sampling (OR: 1.492, 95% CI: 1.212-1.837, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality. The most common pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae and Human gammaherpesvirus 4. The proportion of appropriate and targeted antibiotics adjusted was significantly higher than that in the sampling time > 72h group, and the proportion of antifungal and antiviral agents adjusted was lower. In the early sampling group, it was significantly decreased in the CRP, PCT level and NEU% at discharge.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that early sampling of mNGS could shorten the time of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization of patients with severe pneumonia. Patients with higher SOFA score on the day of sampling had a poorer prognosis. It emphasizes that early sampling of mNGS has a positive value.

Validation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary infections in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases receiving immunosuppressant therapy

Background

The accuracy and sensitivity of conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) are insufficient to identify opportunistic pathogens in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). The study aimed to assess the usefulness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) vs. CMTs for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in patients with SARDs receiving immunosuppressant therapy.

Methods

The medical records of 40 patients with pulmonary infections and SARDs treated with immunosuppressants or corticosteroids were reviewed retrospectively. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected from all patients and examined by mNGS and CMTs. Diagnostic values of the CMTs and mNGS were compared with the clinical composite diagnosis as the reference standard.

Results

Of the 40 patients included for analysis, 37 (92.5%) were diagnosed with pulmonary infections and 3 (7.5%) with non-infectious diseases, of which two were considered primary diseases and one an asthma attack. In total, 15 pathogens (7 bacteria, 5 fungi, and 3 viruses) were detected by CMTs as compared to 58 (36 bacteria, 12 fungi, and 10 viruses) by mNGS. Diagnostic accuracy of mNGS was superior to that of the CMTs for the detection of co-infections with bacteria and fungi (95 vs. 53%, respectively, p < 0.01), and for the detection of single infections with fungi (97.5 vs. 55%, respectively, p < 0.01). Of the 31 patients diagnosed with co-infections, 4 (12.9%) were positive for two pathogens and 27 (87.1%) for three or more. The detection rate of co-infection was significantly higher for mNGS than CMTs (95 vs. 16%, respectively, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The accuracy of mNGS was superior to that of the CMTs for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in patients with SARDs treated with immunosuppressants. The rapid diagnosis by mNGS can ensure timely adjustment of treatment regimens to improve diagnosis and outcomes.

Utility of metagenomics next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis and treatment of severe infectious diseases in the intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a new method that combines high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. However, it has not become as popular due to the limited testing equipment and high costs and lack of family awareness with not much relevant intensive care unit (ICU) research data.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical use and value of metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in patients with sepsis in the ICU.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 102 patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU of Peking University International Hospital from January 2018 to January 2022. Based on whether mNGS was performed, the identified patients were divided into the observation group (n= 51) and the control group (n= 51), respectively. Routine laboratory tests, including routine blood test, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and culture of suspicious lesion specimens were performed in both groups within 2 hours after admission to the ICU, while mNGS tests were performed in the observation group. Patients in both groups were routinely given initial anti-infective, anti-shock, and organ support treatment. Antibiotic regimens were optimized in a timely manner according to the etiological results. Relevant clinical data were collected.

RESULTS

The testing cycle of mNGS was shorter than that of the conventional culture (30.79 ± 4.01 h vs. 85.38 ± 9.94 h, P< 0.001), while the positive rate of mNGS was higher than that of the conventional culture (82.35% vs. 45.1%, P< 0.05), with obvious superiority in the detection of viruses and fungus. There were significant differences in the optimal time of antibiotics (48 h vs.100 h) and length of ICU stay (11 d vs. 16 d) between the observation group and control group (P< 0.01) respectively, with no difference in 28-day mortality (33.3% vs. 41.2%, P> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

mNGS is useful in the detection of sepsis-causing pathogens in the ICU with the advantages of short testing time and high positive rate. There was no difference in the 28-day outcome between the two groups, which may be related to other confounding factors such as small sample size. Additional studies with extended sample size are needed.

Diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in sepsis and bloodstream infection

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in sepsis and bloodstream infection (BSI).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with sepsis and BSI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to February 2022 was conducted. All the patients underwent blood culture and were divided into mNGS group and non-mNGS group according to whether mNGS was performed or not. The mNGS group was further divided into early group (< 1 day), intermediate group (1-3 days), and late group (> 3 days) according to the time of mNGS inspection.

Results

In 194 patients with sepsis and BSI, the positive rate of mNGS for identifying pathogens was significantly higher than that of blood culture (77.7% vs. 47.9%), and the detection period was shorter (1.41 ± 1.01 days vs. 4.82 ± 0.73 days); the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the mNGS group (n = 112) was significantly lower than that of the non-mNGS group (n = 82) (47.32% vs. 62.20%, p = 0.043). The total hospitalization time for the mNGS group was longer than that for the non-mNGS group (18 (9, 33) days vs. 13 (6, 23) days, p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the ICU hospitalization time, mechanical ventilation time, vasoactive drug use time, and 90-day mortality between the two groups (p > 0.05). Sub-group analysis of patients in the mNGS group showed that the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time in the late group were longer than those in the early group (30 (18, 43) days vs. 10 (6, 26) days, 17 (6, 31) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days), and the ICU hospitalization time in the intermediate group was longer than that in the early group (6 (3, 15) days vs. 6 (2, 10) days); the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 28-day mortality rate of the early group was higher than that of the late group (70.21% vs. 30.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

mNGS has the advantages of a short detection period and a high positive rate in the diagnosis of pathogens causing BSI and, eventually, sepsis. Routine blood culture combined with mNGS can significantly reduce the mortality of septic patients with BSI. Early detection using mNGS can shorten the total hospitalization time and the ICU hospitalization time of patients with sepsis and BSI.

Clinical Characteristics and the Effect of Timing for Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis

Background

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has a good performance for the identification of pathogens in infectious diseases, but few studies on the clinical characteristics of mNGS and the effect of timing for mNGS in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Methods

We retrospectively included all patients diagnosed with sepsis after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated hospital between Aug 1, 2019 and Apr 1, 2021. During the study period, pathogens for all enrolled subjects were obtained by mNGS. We analyzed the composition and positive rate of different samples type for mNGS. And then we used the univariable and multivariable logistic regression to explore the risk factors associated with all-cause mortality at 28 days.

Results

A total of 87 patients were included and 87 samples were analyzed among these patients. The most common sample for mNGS was bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), about 84% (73/87). The positive rate of pathogens identification by mNGS was higher than conventional culture (92% vs 36%, p < 0.001). In addition to the pathogens detected by conventional culture, mNGS can detect more viruses and fungi. Based on the mNGS report, clinicians made adjustments to the antibiotic regimen for 72% patients. The multivariate binary logistic regression analysis suggested that age (OR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.005-1.067; p = 0.021) and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on the day of mNGS sampling were independent risk factors of death at 28 days (OR, 1.204; 95% CI, 1.038-1.397; p = 0.014).

Conclusion

In critically ill patients with sepsis, the most common sample type for mNGS was BALF, and the positive rate of mNGS is higher than conventional cultures, especially in viruses and fungi. Meanwhile, mNGS can guide clinicians in adjusting antibiotic regimens. Age and the SOFA score on the day of mNGS sampling were independent risk factors for death.

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) for the Timely Diagnosis of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Leukemia Patients

This report shows the contribution of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) as an alternative to challenging diagnostic infection in immunosuppressed individuals. Herein, we report two leukemia patients who developed severe infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CrKP). The mNGS can be strongly recommended as an alternative investigation for patients who are at high risk of infection without positivity on body fluid culture. This can provide the opportunity for adequate therapy.