Effect of β-blockers on mortality in patients with sepsis: A propensity-score matched analysis

Effectiveness of β-blockers in improving 28-day mortality in septic shock: insights from subgroup analysis and retrospective observational study

Background

In recent years, septic shock remains a common fatal disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). After sufficient fluid resuscitation, some patients still experience tachycardia, which may lead to adverse effects on cardiac function. However, the use of β-blockers in the treatment of septic shock remains controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of β-blockers in the treatment of patients with septic shock and explore the most appropriate patient subgroups for this treatment.

Methods

This retrospective observational study enrolled septic shock patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance some baseline differences between patients with and without β-blockers treatment. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. Length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital, and the degree of support for organs such as circulatory, respiratory and renal systems were also assessed. Subgroup analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the relationship between β-blockers therapy and 28-day mortality in different patient groups.

Results

A total of 4,860 septic shock patients were enrolled in this study and 619 pairs were finally matched after PSM. Our analysis revealed that β-blocker therapy was associated with a significant improvement in 28-day mortality (21.5% vs. 27.1%; P = 0.020) and led to a prolonged LOS in both the ICU and hospital. Subgroup analysis indicated that there was an interaction between cardiovascular diseases and β-blocker therapy in patients with septic shock. Patients with pre-existing heart disease or atrial arrhythmias were more likely to derive benefits from β-blocker treatment.

Conclusion

We found β-blockers therapy was effective to improve 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Patients in the subgroup with cardiovascular diseases were more likely to benefit from β-blockers in mortality.

Impact of β-blockers on in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure: a retrospective propensity-score matched analysis based on MIMIC-IV database

Introduction

This study assessed the relationship between β-blockers treatment and in-hospital mortality among individuals diagnosed with heart failure (HF).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was carried out on 9,968 HF patients sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline differences. A multivariate regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the impact of β-blockers therapy on in-hospital mortality.

Results

Among the 9,968 patients, 6,439 (64.6%) were β-blockers users. Before matching, the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 12.2% (1,217/9,968). Following PSM, a total of 3,212 patient pairs were successfully matched. The analysis revealed a correlation between β-blockers therapy and decreased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.51 [0.43-0.60], P < 0.001), as well as shorter Los (length of stay) hospital (β -1.43 [-1.96∼-0.09], P < 0.001). Notably, long-acting β-blockers treatment was linked to a decreased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.55 [0.46-0.65], P < 0.001) and a shorter Los hospital (β -1.21 [-1.80∼-0.63], P < 0.001). Conversely, the research results did not show a notable decrease in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.66 [0.44-1.01], P = 0.051) or Los hospital (β -1.01 [-2.2∼-0.25], P = 0.117) associated with short-acting β-blocker therapy.

Discussion

β-blockers therapy in the intensive care unit demonstrates potential benefits in lowering the risk of in-hospital mortality and reducing the duration of hospitalization among patients with HF. Specifically, long-acting β-blockers exhibit a protective effect by significantly decreasing both in-hospital mortality and Los hospital. Conversely, the study did not observe a substantial impact on in-hospital mortality or Los hospital duration in this cohort of patients following the administration of short-acting β-blockers.

Efficacy of β-Blockers in Decreasing Mortality in Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Systematic Review

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition leading to various organ dysfunction due to an underlying infection. Despite providing appropriate treatment, it is still one of the most common causes of death among patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). So, multiple studies have been conducted to identify the potential benefits of various drugs in decreasing mortality in sepsis apart from its traditional treatment options. This study aims to identify whether β-blockers play a role in decreasing mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients because of their potential benefits on several organ systems. Medical databases such as Google Scholar, Summon, PubMed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) were systematically searched for relevant publications. The identified articles were assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 11 research articles were finalized, for which quality appraisal was done using appropriate appraisal tools. β-blockers significantly lowered the in-hospital mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients, and they were also associated with better patient outcomes. As there are limited studies, further research needs to be done to explore the role of β-blockers in decreasing mortality in critically ill populations such as sepsis and septic shock patients.

Beta-Blockers as an Immunologic and Autonomic Manipulator in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of the Recent Literature

The autonomic nervous system plays a key role in maintaining body hemostasis through both the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Sympathetic overstimulation as a reflex to multiple pathologies, such as septic shock, brain injury, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest, could be harmful and lead to autonomic and immunologic dysfunction. The continuous stimulation of the beta receptors on immune cells has an inhibitory effect on these cells and may lead to immunologic dysfunction through enhancing the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-10 (IL-10), and inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory factors, such as interleukin-1B IL-1B and tissue necrotizing factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Sympathetic overstimulation-induced autonomic dysfunction may also happen due to adrenergic receptor insensitivity or downregulation. Administering anti-adrenergic medication, such as beta-blockers, is a promising treatment to compensate against the undesired effects of adrenergic surge. Despite many misconceptions about beta-blockers, beta-blockers have shown a promising effect in decreasing mortality in patients with critical illness. In this review, we summarize the recently published articles that have discussed using beta-blockers as a promising treatment to decrease mortality in critically ill patients, such as patients with septic shock, traumatic brain injury, cardiogenic shock, acute decompensated heart failure, and electrical storm. We also discuss the potential pathophysiology of beta-blockers in various types of critical illness. More clinical trials are encouraged to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of beta-blockers in improving mortality among critically ill patients.

The concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with vasopressors and inotropes in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Septic shock is associated with systemic inflammatory response, hemodynamic instability, impaired sympathetic control, and the development of multiorgan dysfunction that requires vasopressor or inotropic support. The regulation of immune function in sepsis is complex and varies over time. However, activating Beta-2 receptors and blocking Beta-1 receptors reduces the proinflammatory response by influencing cytokine production. Evidence that supports the concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with inotropes and vasopressors in patients with septic shock is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultra short beta-blockers and its impact on the ICU related outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, heart rate control, shock resolution, and vasopressors/inotropes requirements.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including critically ill patients with septic shock who received inotropes and vasopressors. Patients who received either epinephrine or norepinephrine without beta-blockers "control group" were compared to patients who received ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine "Intervention group". MEDLINE and Embase databases were utilized to systematically search for studies investigating the use of ultra short beta-blockers in critically ill patients on either epinephrine or norepinephrine from inception to October 10, 2023. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. While, length of stay, heart rate control, and inotropes/ vasopressors requirements were considered secondary outcomes.

Results

Among 47 potentially relevant studies, nine were included in the analysis. The 28-day mortality risk was lower in patients with septic shock who used ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine compared with the control group (RR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.53, 0.89), I2=26%; P=0.24). In addition, heart rate was statistically significantly lower with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -22.39 (95% CI: -24.71, -20.06) among the beta-blockers group than the control group. The SMD for hospital length of stay and the inotropes requirement were not statistically different between the two groups (SMD (95%CI): -0.57 (-2.77, 1.64), and SMD (95%CI): 0.08 (-0.02, 0.19), respectively).

Conclusion

The use of ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine in critically ill patients with septic shock was associated with better heart rate control and survival benefits without increment in the inotropes and vasopressors requirement.

Prolonged elevated heart rate and 90-Day mortality in acute pancreatitis

Prolonged elevated heart rate (peHR) is recognized as a risk factor for poor prognosis among critically ill patients. However, there is currently a lack of studies investigating the association between peHR and patients with acute pancreatitis. Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database was used to identify patients with acute pancreatitis. PeHR was defined as a heart rate exceeding 100 beats per minute for at least 11 out of 12 consecutive hours. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between peHR and the 90-Day mortality. A total of 364 patients (48.9%) experienced a peHR episode. The 90-day mortality was 25%. PeHR is an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality (HR, 1.98; 95% CI 1.53-2.56; P < 0.001). KM survival curves exhibited a significant decrease in the survival rate at 90 days among patients who experienced a peHR episode (P < 0.001, 84.5% vs. 65.1%). We revealed a significant association of peHR with decreased survival in a large cohort of ICU patients with acute pancreatitis.

Heart rate/temperature ratio: A practical prognostic indicator for critically ill patients with sepsis

Background

We hypothesize that the heart rate/temperature ratio can predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in critical ill patients with sepsis. We aimed to explore the association between the heart rate/temperature ratio and ICU mortality in patients with sepsis.

Methods

We conducted this study utilizing a comprehensive critical care medicine database. The primary endpoint assessed was ICU mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to determine the independent impact of the heart rate to temperature ratio on ICU mortality.

Results

The study included 12,321 patients. A nonlinear relationship was observed between the heart rate/temperature ratio and ICU mortality, with an inflection point identified at 2.22. The results from the Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the heart rate/temperature ratio independently contributed to the risk of ICU mortality. In model II, there was a 55 % higher ICU mortality rate with a heart rate/temperature ratio greater than 2.22 than with that less than 2.22 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.77). Moreover, an elevated heart rate/temperature ratio as a continuous variable showed a positive association with ICU mortality (OR = 2.14; 95 % CI: 1.87-2.45). The impact of the heart rate/temperature ratio on ICU mortality remained consistent across all subgroup variables. The sensitivity analysis results consistently supported the primary outcome, with an E value of 2.47. This suggests that the influence of unmeasured confounders on the observed outcomes was minimal, thereby confirming the robustness of the findings.

Conclusions

The heart rate/temperature ratio is a readily available and convenient indicator in a clinical setting. Elevated heart rate/temperature ratios, particularly those exceeding 2.22, are strongly linked to a high ICU mortality rate among critically ill sepsis patients.

Effects of beta-blockers use on mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a challenging disease with limited prevention and treatment options. The usage of beta-blockers may have potential benefits in different critical illnesses. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between beta-blocker therapy and mortality in patients with ARDS. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database and focused on patients diagnosed with ARDS. The primary outcome of the study was 30-day mortality. To account for confounding factors, a multivariable analysis was performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out on a 1:1 ratio. Robust assessments were conducted using inverse probability weighting (IPTW), standardized mortality ratio weighting (SMRW), pairwise algorithms (PA), and overlap weights (OW). Results: A total of 1,104 patients with ARDS were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses found that the 30-day mortality for 489 patients (23.7%) who received beta-blockers was significantly lower than the mortality rate of 615 patients (35.9%) who did not receive beta-blockers. After adjusting for potential confounders through PSM and propensity score, as well as utilizing IPTW, SMRW, PA, and OW, the results remained robust, with the hazard ratios (HR) ranging from 0.42 to 0.58 and all p-values < 0.001. Evaluation of the E-values indicated the robustness of the results even in the presence of unmeasured confounding. Conclusion: The findings suggest a potential association between beta-blocker usage and reduced mortality in critically ill patients with ARDS. However, further validation of this observation is needed through randomized controlled trials.