Prognostic Value of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Acute Heart Failure

The Need to Identify Novel Markers for Early Renal Injury in Cardiorenal Syndrome

The term "Cardiorenal Syndrome" (CRS) refers to the complex interplay between heart and kidney dysfunction. First described by Robert Bright in 1836, CRS was brought to its modern view by Ronco et al. in 2008, who defined it as one organ's primary dysfunction leading to secondary dysfunction in the other, a view that led to the distinction of five different types depending on the organ of primary dysfunction and the temporal pattern (acute vs. chronic). Their pathophysiology is intricate, involving various hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and inflammatory processes that result in damage to both organs. While traditional biomarkers have been utilized for diagnosing and prognosticating CRS, they are inadequate for the early detection of acute renal damage. Hence, there is a pressing need to discover new biomarkers to enhance clinical outcomes and treatment approaches.

N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Correlates with Ghrelin and Acyl-Ghrelin in Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease

Pro-B amino-terminal natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a diagnostic marker for heart failure (HF), a severe complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its significance in CKD is not clear, as other factors, such as renal function, may also have an impact. Recent studies have shown that ghrelin treatment is effective in HF in the general population, but the impact of ghrelin on cardiac function in CKD patients is still unknown. Our study aimed to investigate the factors associated with NT-proBNP in pre-dialysis CKD patients and to evaluate the correlation between NT-proBNP and ghrelin and acyl-ghrelin, molecules determined using ELISA methods. In a cross-sectional observational study, we included 80 patients with pre-dialysis CKD, with a mean age of 68 years and 50% men. The median values for NT-proBNP were 351.8 pg/mL, for acyl ghrelin 16.39 pg/mL, and for ghrelin 543.32 pg/mL. NT-proBNP was correlated with ghrelin (p = 0.034, r = 0.24), acyl-ghrelin (p = 0.033, r = -0.24), estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.027, r = -0.25), serum urea (p = 0.006, r = 0.31), and ferritin (p = 0.041, r = 0.28). In multivariate analysis, ghrelin (p = 0.040) and blood urea (p = 0.040) remained significant predictors for NT-proBNP levels. NT-proBNP was a significant predictor for acyl-ghrelin (p = 0.036). In conclusion, in pre-dialysis CKD patients, a high value of NT-proBNP was associated with a high value of total ghrelin and a low value of acyl-ghrelin.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Aminoterminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction Stratified by the Degree of Renal Dysfunction

Limited data concerning the diagnostic and prognostic value of blood-derived biomarkers in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is available. This study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic value of aminoterminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with HFmrEF, stratified by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Consecutive patients with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. First, the diagnostic value of NT-proBNP for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) was tested. Thereafter, the prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels was tested for 30-months all-cause mortality in patients with ADHF. From a total of 755 patients hospitalized with HFmrEF, the rate of ADHF was 42%. Patients with ADHF revealed higher NT-proBNP levels compared to patients without (median 5394 pg/mL vs. 1655 pg/mL; p = 0.001). NT-proBNP was able to discriminate ADHF with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.777 (p = 0.001), with the highest AUC in patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min (AUC = 0.800; p = 0.001), and no diagnostic value was seen in eGFR < 30 mL/min (AUC = 0.576; p = 0.210). Patients with NT-proBNP levels > 3946 pg/mL were associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality at 30 months (57.7% vs. 34.4%; HR = 2.036; 95% CI 1.423-2.912; p = 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (HR = 1.712; 95% CI 1.166-2.512; p = 0.006). In conclusion, increasing NT-proBNP levels predicted the risk of ADHF and all-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF and preserved renal function; however, NT-proBNP levels were not predictive in patients with HFmrEF and eGFR < 30 mL/min.

A comprehensive review of acute cardio-renal syndrome: need for novel biomarkers

Cardiorenal syndrome represents a wide-spectrum disorder involving the heart and kidneys as the primary affected organs. India has an increasingly high burden of acute CRS, coinciding with the rise in global statistics. Up to 2022, approximately 46.1% of all cardiorenal patients have been diagnosed with acute CRS in India. Acute CRS involves a sudden deterioration of kidney functionalities, referred to as acute kidney injury (AKI) in acute heart failure patients. The pathophysiology of CRS involves hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) following acute myocardial stress. The pathological phenotype of acute CRS is associated with perturbed inflammatory, cellular, and neurohormonal markers in circulation. These complications increase the risk of mortality in clinically diagnosed acute CRS patients, making it a worldwide healthcare burden. Hence, effective diagnosis and early prevention are crucial to prevent the progression of CRS in AHF patients. Present biomarkers, such as serum creatinine (sCr), cystatin C (CysC), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum and/or urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and NT-proBNP, are clinically used to diagnose AKI stages in CRS patients but are limitedly sensitive to the early detection of the pathology. Therefore, the need for protein biomarkers is emerging for early intervention in CRS progression. Here, we summarized the cardio-renal nexus in acute CRS, with an emphasis on the present clinicopathological biomarkers and their limitations. The objective of this review is to highlight the need for novel proteomic biomarkers that will curb the burgeoning concern and direct future research trials.

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Admission Is a Predictor of All-Cause Mortality at One Year after the First Acute Episode of New-Onset Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been assessed extensively, but few studies analysed the predictive value of the NT-proBNP in patients with de novo and acute HFpEF. We sought to identify NT-proBNP at admission as a predictor for all-cause mortality and rehospitalisation at 12 months in patients with new-onset HFpEF. Methods: We analysed 91 patients (73 ± 11 years, 68% females) admitted for de novo and acute HFpEF, using the Cox proportional hazard risk model. Results: An admission NT-proBNP level above the threshold of 2910 pg/mL identified increased all-cause mortality at 12 months (AUC = 0.72, sensitivity = 92%, specificity = 53%, p < 0.001). All-cause mortality adjusted for age, gender, medical history, and medication in the augmented NT-proBNP group was 16-fold higher (p = 0.018), but with no difference in rehospitalisation rates (p = 0.391). The predictors of increased NT-proBNP ≥ 2910 pg/mL were: age (p = 0.016), estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.006), left atrial volume index (p = 0.001), history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.006), and TAPSE (p = 0.009). Conclusions: NT-proBNP above 2910 pg/mL at admission for de novo and acute HFpEF predicted a 16-fold increased mortality at 12 months, whereas values less than 2910 pg/mL forecast a high likelihood of survival (99.3%) in the next 12 months, and should be considered as a useful prognostic tool, in addition to its utility in diagnosing heart failure.

A Survival Prediction for Acute Heart Failure Patients via Web-Based Dynamic Nomogram with Internal Validation: A Prospective Cohort Study

Purpose

The current study aimed to develop a convenient and accurate prognostic dynamic nomogram model for the risk of all-cause death in acute heart failure (AHF) patients that incorporates clinical characteristics including N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) and growth stimulation expresses gene 2 protein (ST2).

Patients and Methods

We prospectively studied 537 consecutive AHF patients and derived a clinical prediction model. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model combined with clinical characteristics were used for dimensional reduction and feature selection. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis and “Dynnom” package were used to build the dynamic nomogram for prediction of 1-,2-,and 5-year overall survival for AHF. With bootstrap validation, the time-dependent concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves were used to assess predictive discrimination and accuracy. The contributions of NT-pro BNP and ST2 to the nomogram were evaluated using integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI), while decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess clinical value.

Results

Patients were randomly divided into derivation (74.9%, n=402) and validation (25.1%, n=135) cohorts. Optimal independent prognostic factors for 1-,2-, and 5-year all-cause mortality were BS-ACMR (B: NT-pro BNP; S: ST2; A: age; C: complete right bundle branch block; M: mean arterial pressure; and R: red cell distribution width >14.5%); these were incorporated into the dynamic nomogram (https://bs-acmr-nom.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/) with bootstrap validation. The C-indexes in the derivation (0.793) and validation (0.782) cohorts were consistent with comparable performance parameters. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the nomogram-predicted and actual survival. Adding NT-pro BNP and ST2 provided a significant net benefit and improved performance over other less adequate schemes in terms of DCA of survival probability compared to those neglecting either of these two factors.

Conclusion

The study constructed a dynamic BS-ACMR nomogram, which is a convenient, practical and effective clinical decision-making tool for providing accurate prognosis in AHF patients.

Characterization of tolvaptan response and its impact on the outcome for patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Conventional diuretic therapy such as loop diuretics is a cornerstone of the treatment for heart failure (HF). Diuretic response is an important factor in determining resistance to HF therapy and has been shown to be associated with subsequent clinical outcome. Tolvaptan (TVP), a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, has a favorable profile in terms of rapid fluid removal and less aggravation of renal function. We hypothesized that the response to TVP might be associated with the subsequent clinical outcome.

METHOD

In this single-center retrospective study, 148 consecutive HF patients who were administered TVP from 2014 through 2018 [age 79 (69-86) years, male 89 (60%)] were included. Ninety-six patients were divided into TVP responder [N = 39 (41%)] and non-responder groups based on the cut-off value of gained urine output (+ 93 ml/mg TVP /day) on the day after TVP was introduced.

RESULTS

Early TVP introduction (p = 0.012) and lower dose of loop diuretics (p = 0.043) were predictors of TVP responder. For 2 years after discharge, TVP responders showed more favorable outcomes regarding the primary endpoint defined as the composite of all-cause death and HF readmission (p = 0.034, log-rank test) and HF readmission (p = 0.005). A multivariable Cox model analysis revealed that TVP responder was an independent predictor of the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 0.48, p = 0.041). TVP responders had a lower number of HF readmissions over a 1-year period (p = 0.002). TVP response was independently associated with the number of HF readmissions (p = 0.015). The proportion of patients with an extended period between discharge and HF readmission after TVP administration was higher in responders than non-responders (67% vs. 23%, p = 0.006). These associations of TVP response and post-discharge outcomes were more evident in patients who continued TVP after discharge.

CONCLUSION

TVP response can be indicative of subsequent clinical outcomes and may be informative when considering advanced care planning.