Exercise Systolic Reserve and Exercise Pulmonary Hypertension Improve Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

mPAP/CO Slope and Oxygen Uptake Add Prognostic Value in Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines redefined exercise pulmonary hypertension as a mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope >3 mm Hg·L-1·min-1. A peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure >60 mm Hg during exercise has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, heart failure rehospitalization, and aortic valve replacement in aortic valve stenosis. The prognostic value of the mPAP/CO slope in aortic valve stenosis remains unknown.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients (n=143; age, 73±11 years) with an aortic valve area ≤1.5 cm2 underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with echocardiography. They were subsequently evaluated for the occurrence of cardiovascular events (ie, cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, new-onset atrial fibrillation, and aortic valve replacement) during a follow-up period of 1 year. Findings were externally validated (validation cohort, n=141).

RESULTS

One cardiovascular death, 32 aortic valve replacements, 9 new-onset atrial fibrillation episodes, and 4 heart failure hospitalizations occurred in the derivation cohort, whereas 5 cardiovascular deaths, 32 aortic valve replacements, 1 new-onset atrial fibrillation episode, and 10 heart failure hospitalizations were observed in the validation cohort. Peak aortic velocity (odds ratio [OR] per SD, 1.48; P=0.036), indexed left atrial volume (OR per SD, 2.15; P=0.001), E/e' at rest (OR per SD, 1.61; P=0.012), mPAP/CO slope (OR per SD, 2.01; P=0.002), and age-, sex-, and height-based predicted peak exercise oxygen uptake (OR per SD, 0.59; P=0.007) were independently associated with cardiovascular events at 1 year, whereas peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was not (OR per SD, 1.28; P=0.219). Peak Vo2 (percent) and mPAP/CO slope provided incremental prognostic value in addition to indexed left atrial volume and aortic valve area (P<0.001). These results were confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In moderate and severe aortic valve stenosis, mPAP/CO slope and percent-predicted peak Vo2 were independent predictors of cardiovascular events, whereas peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure was not. In addition to aortic valve area and indexed left atrial volume, percent-predicted peak Vo2 and mPAP/CO slope cumulatively improved risk stratification.

Right ventricular outflow tract diameter change with exercise: a prospective exercise echocardiography and invasive CPET study

While cardiac output reserve with exercise predicts outcomes in cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease, precise quantification of exercise cardiac output requires invasive cardiopulmonary testing (iCPET). To improve the accuracy of cardiac output reserve estimation with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), this prospective study aims to define changes in right ventricular outflow tract diameter (RVOTd) with exercise and its relationship with invasively measured haemodynamics. Twenty subjects underwent simultaneous TTE and iCPET, with data collected at rest, leg-raise, 25 W, 50 W (n = 16), 75 W (n = 14), and 100 W (n = 6). This was followed by a second exercise study with real-time RV pressure-volume loops at similar stages (except leg-raise). The overall cohort included heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 12), pulmonary arterial hypertension (n = 5), and non-cardiac dyspnoea (n = 3). RVOTd was reverse engineered from the TTE-derived RVOT velocity time integral (VTI) and iCPET-derived stroke volume, using the formula: Fick stroke volume = RVOT VTI × RVOT area (wherein RVOT area = π × [RVOTd/2]2). RVOTd increased by nearly 3-4% at every 25 W increment. Using linear regression models, where each subject is treated as a categorical variable and adjusting for subject intercept, RVOTd was correlated with haemodynamic variables (cardiac output, heart rate, pulmonary artery and RV pressures). Of all the predictor haemodynamic variables, cardiac output had the highest r2 model fit (adjusted r2 = 0.68), with a unit increase in cardiac output associated with a 0.0678 increase in RVOTd (P < 0.001). Our findings indicate that RVOTd increases by 3-4% with every 25 W increment, predominantly correlated with cardiac output augmentation. These results can improve the accuracy of cardiac output reserve estimation by adjusting for RVOTd with graded exercise during non-invasive CPET and echocardiogram. However, future studies are needed to define these relationships for left ventricular outflow tract diameter.

Pulmonary hypertension during exercise underlies unexplained exertional dyspnoea in patients with Type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To compare the cardiac function and pulmonary vascular function during exercise between dyspnoeic and non-dyspnoeic patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-seven T2DM patients with unexplained dyspnoea and 50 asymptomatic T2DM patients underwent exercise echocardiography combined with ergospirometry. Left ventricular (LV) function [stroke volume, cardiac output (CO), LV ejection fraction, systolic annular velocity (s')], estimated LV filling pressures (E/e'), mean pulmonary arterial pressures (mPAPs) and mPAP/COslope were assessed at rest, low- and high-intensity exercise with colloid contrast. Groups had similar patient characteristics, glycemic control, stroke volume, CO, LV ejection fraction, and E/e' (P > 0.05). The dyspnoeic group had significantly lower systolic LV reserve at peak exercise (s') (P = 0.021) with a significant interaction effect (P < 0.001). The dyspnoeic group also had significantly higher mPAP and mPAP/CO at rest and exercise (P < 0.001) with significant interaction for mPAP (P < 0.009) and insignificant for mPAP/CO (P = 0.385). There was no significant difference in mPAP/COslope between groups (P = 0.706). However, about 61% of dyspnoeic vs. 30% of non-dyspnoeic group had mPAP/COslope > 3 (P = 0.009). The mPAP/COslope negatively predicted V̇O2peak in dyspneic group (β = -1.86, 95% CI: -2.75, -0.98; multivariate model R2:0.54).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary hypertension and less LV systolic reserve detected by exercise echocardiography with colloid contrast underlie unexplained exertional dyspnoea and reduced exercise capacity in T2DM.