1
|
Alami H, Lehoux P, Papoutsi C, Shaw SE, Fleet R, Fortin JP. Understanding the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare organisations and systems through the NASSS framework: a qualitative study in a leading Canadian academic centre. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:701. [PMID: 38831298 PMCID: PMC11149257 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11112-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are expected to "revolutionise" healthcare. However, despite their promises, their integration within healthcare organisations and systems remains limited. The objective of this study is to explore and understand the systemic challenges and implications of their integration in a leading Canadian academic hospital. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 stakeholders concerned by the integration of a large set of AI technologies within the organisation (e.g., managers, clinicians, researchers, patients, technology providers). Data were collected and analysed using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability (NASSS) framework. RESULTS Among enabling factors and conditions, our findings highlight: a supportive organisational culture and leadership leading to a coherent organisational innovation narrative; mutual trust and transparent communication between senior management and frontline teams; the presence of champions, translators, and boundary spanners for AI able to build bridges and trust; and the capacity to attract technical and clinical talents and expertise. Constraints and barriers include: contrasting definitions of the value of AI technologies and ways to measure such value; lack of real-life and context-based evidence; varying patients' digital and health literacy capacities; misalignments between organisational dynamics, clinical and administrative processes, infrastructures, and AI technologies; lack of funding mechanisms covering the implementation, adaptation, and expertise required; challenges arising from practice change, new expertise development, and professional identities; lack of official professional, reimbursement, and insurance guidelines; lack of pre- and post-market approval legal and governance frameworks; diversity of the business and financing models for AI technologies; and misalignments between investors' priorities and the needs and expectations of healthcare organisations and systems. CONCLUSION Thanks to the multidimensional NASSS framework, this study provides original insights and a detailed learning base for analysing AI technologies in healthcare from a thorough socio-technical perspective. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the complexity characterising healthcare organisations and systems in current efforts to introduce AI technologies within clinical routines. This study adds to the existing literature and can inform decision-making towards a judicious, responsible, and sustainable integration of these technologies in healthcare organisations and systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassane Alami
- Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, P.O. Box 6128, Branch Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
- Center for Public Health Research of the University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Institute for Data Valorization (IVADO), Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Pascale Lehoux
- Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, P.O. Box 6128, Branch Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
- Center for Public Health Research of the University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sara E Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Fleet
- Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-Paul Fortin
- Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seuren LM, Gilbert A, Ramdharry G, Walumbe J, Shaw SE. Video analysis of communication by physiotherapists and patients in video consultations: a qualitative study using conversation analysis. Physiotherapy 2024; 123:30-37. [PMID: 38262264 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the challenges of doing physical examinations and exercises by video, and the communication strategies used by physiotherapists and patients to overcome them. DESIGN A qualitative study of talk and social actions, examining the verbal and non-verbal communication practices used by patients and physiotherapists. Video consultations between physiotherapists and patients were video recorded using MS Teams, transcribed and analysed in detail using Conversation Analysis. SETTING Video consultations were recorded in three specialist settings (long-term pain, orthopaedics, and neuromuscular rehabilitation) across two NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS 15 adult patients (10 female, 5 male; aged 20-77) with a scheduled video consultation. RESULTS Examinations and exercises retain-->were successfully accomplished in all 15 consultations. Two key challenges were identified for physiotherapists and patients when doing video assessments: (1) managing safety and clinical risk, and (2) making exercises and movements visible. Challenges were addressed by through communication practices that were patient-centred and tailored to the video context (e.g., explaining how to frame the body to the camera or adjust the camera to make the body visible). CONCLUSIONS Video is being used by physiotherapists to consult with their patients. This can work well, but tailored communication strategies are critical to help participants overcome the challenges of remote physical examinations and exercises. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER This paper is a first to use video-based analysis to determine the challenges of video consulting for doing remote assessments and exercises in physiotherapy settings. It demonstrates how patients and physiotherapists use communication strategies to raise concerns around safety and visibility and how they overcome these concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas M Seuren
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom; Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 100 Queensway West, Mississauga, ON L5B 1B8, Canada.
| | - Anthony Gilbert
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Brockley Hill, Stanmore HA7 4LP, United Kingdom
| | - Gita Ramdharry
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Walumbe
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Sara E Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seuren LM, Ilomäki S, Dalmaijer E, Shaw SE, Stommel WJP. Communication in Telehealth: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Conversation-Analytic Research. RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION 2024; 57:73-90. [PMID: 38741749 PMCID: PMC11090155 DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2024.2305045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
We provide a state-of-the-art review of research on conversation analysis and telehealth. We conducted a systematic review of the literature, focusing on studies that investigate how technology is procedurally consequential for the interaction. We discerned three key topics: the interactional organization, the therapeutic relationship, and the clinical activities of the encounter. The literature on telehealth is highly heterogeneous, with significant differences between text-based care (e.g., via chat or e-mail) and audio(visual) care (e.g., via telephone or video). We discuss the extent to which remote care can be regarded as a demarcated field for study or whether the medium is merely part of the "context," particularly when investigating hybrid and polymedia forms of care involving multiple technological media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas M. Seuren
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Canada
| | | | - Evi Dalmaijer
- Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Netherlands
| | - Sara E. Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore L, Hughes G, Wherton J, Shaw S. 'When the visible body is no longer the seer': The phenomenology of perception and the clinical gaze in video consultations. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2024; 46:418-436. [PMID: 37746806 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Video technology enabled professionals and patients to conduct consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic when in-person health care was minimised to reduce the spread of the virus. We present findings of a study of video-consulting through in-depth qualitative remote interviews with 40 health professionals, managers, support staff and 10 patients in health-care services across the UK from 2020 to 2021. Drawing on Foucault's concept of the clinical gaze, Merleau-Ponty's work on the phenomenology of perception and Ihde's postphenomenology we interpreted the ways in which remote consultations shaped patient-professional interactions, mediating and framing what was seen, revealed and known. We found that participating in video consultations not only involved creative adaption and adjustment to a virtual clinic but also changed how professionals and patients saw and were seen. We argue that this mode of consulting can transform boundaries and perceptions, alter aspects of clinical presence, knowledge and embodiment and thus both change and incorporate the clinical gaze.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Moore
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gemma Hughes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sara Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Payne R, Dakin F. The place of remote consultation in modern general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2024; 74:7-8. [PMID: 38154925 PMCID: PMC10755988 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp24x735873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Payne
- National Institute for Health and Care Research In-Practice Fellow, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| | - Francesca Dakin
- Student and Research Assistant, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Boven JFM, Drummond D, Chan AHY, Hew M, Hui CY, Adejumo I, Cano I, Hansen K, Poberezhets V, Costello RW, Pinnock H. ERS "CONNECT" Clinical Research Collaboration - moving multiple digital innovations towards connected respiratory care: addressing the over-arching challenges of whole systems implementation. Eur Respir J 2023; 62:2301680. [PMID: 37945041 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01680-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Job F M van Boven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Drummond
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, University Hospital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Inserm UMR 1138, HeKA team, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
| | - Amy H Y Chan
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mark Hew
- Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chi Yan Hui
- The University of Edinburgh, Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ireti Adejumo
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham, UK
| | - Isaac Cano
- Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Suñer (FRCB-IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kjeld Hansen
- European Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK
- School of Economics, Innovation and Technology, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vitalii Poberezhets
- Department of Propedeutics of Internal Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya, Ukraine
| | - Richard W Costello
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Clinical Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hilary Pinnock
- The University of Edinburgh, Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pinnock H, Noble M, Lo D, McClatchey K, Marsh V, Hui CY. Personalised management and supporting individuals to live with their asthma in a primary care setting. Expert Rev Respir Med 2023; 17:577-596. [PMID: 37535011 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2241357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Complementing recognition of biomedical phenotypes, a primary care approach to asthma care recognizes diversity of disease, health beliefs, and lifestyle at a population and individual level. AREAS COVERED We review six aspects of personalized care particularly pertinent to primary care management of asthma: personalizing support for individuals living with asthma; targeting asthma care within populations; managing phenotypes of wheezy pre-school children; personalizing management to the individual; meeting individual preferences for provision of asthma care; optimizing digital approaches to enhance personalized care. EXPERT OPINION In a primary care setting, personalized management and supporting individuals to live with asthma extend beyond the contemporary concepts of biological phenotypes and pharmacological 'treatable traits' to encompass evidence-based tailored support for self-management, and delivery of patient-centered care including motivational interviewing. It extends to how we organize clinical practiceand the choices provided in mode of consultation. Diagnostic uncertainty due to recognition of phenotypes of pre-school wheeze remains a challenge for primary care. Digital health can support personalized management, but there are concerns about increasing inequities. This broad approach reflects the traditionally holistic ethos of primary care ('knowing their patients and understanding their communities'), but the core concepts resonate with all healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Pinnock
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Whitstable Medical Practice, Whitstable, Kent, UK
| | - Mike Noble
- Primary Care Research Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Acle Medical Centre, Norfolk, UK
| | - David Lo
- Department of Respiratory Sciences, College of Life Sciences, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (Respiratory Theme), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Viv Marsh
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- CYP Asthma Transformation Black Country Integrated Care Board, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Chi Yan Hui
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Deanery of Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- The UK Engineering Council, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hughes G, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Shasha'h S, Greene S, Shaw S, Greenhalgh T. Protocol: How can people with social care needs be supported through processes of digital care navigation to access remote primary care? A multi-site case study in UK general practice of remote care as the 'new normal'. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2023; 3:17. [PMID: 37881454 PMCID: PMC10593327 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13385.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Care navigation refers to support for patients accessing primary care and other related services. The expansion of digitally enabled care in the UK since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a greater need for digital care navigation: supporting people to access primary care digitally and, if necessary, to help them find alternative non-digital routes of access. Support to patients with social care needs (including but not limited to those who are homeless and insecurely housed, living in residential care and supported by domiciliary carers) increasingly involves work to navigate primary care provided remotely and accessed digitally. There is little knowledge about how this work is being done. Methods Care Navigation involves embedded researchers identifying digital care navigation for patients accessing services in 11 GP practices recruited to a linked study of remote primary care ( Remote care as the 'new normal?'). Digital care navigation will be studied through go-along (in-person or remote) interviews with a sample of 20 people offering formal (paid or voluntary) support, 6 national and regional stakeholders who plan, commission or provide digital care navigation and a focus group with 12 social prescribers engaged in digital care navigation. A co-design workshop with people working in, or commissioning, social care settings will consider how findings can inform improved digital care navigation, for example through the development of resources or guidance for care navigators. Results anticipated Findings are anticipated to include evidence of how digital care navigation is practised, the work that is done to support patients in accessing remote primary care, and how this work is shaped by material resources and variations in the configuration of services and infrastructure. Conclusions New explanations of the work needed to navigate digital care will inform policy and service developments aimed at helping patients benefit from remote primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Hughes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
- Penisula Medical School (Faculty of Health), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Sara Shasha'h
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sarah Greene
- Penisula Medical School (Faculty of Health), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Sara Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wainwright L, Senker S, Canvin K, Sheard L. "It was really poor prior to the pandemic. It got really bad after": A qualitative study of the impact of COVID-19 on prison healthcare in England. HEALTH & JUSTICE 2023; 11:6. [PMID: 36749526 PMCID: PMC9903265 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-023-00212-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of COVID-19 has been exceptional, particularly on the National Health Service which has juggled COVID affected patients alongside related staff shortages and the existing (and growing) health needs of the population. In prisons too, healthcare teams have been balancing patient needs against staffing shortfalls, but with additional strains unique to the prison population. Such strains include drastic lockdown regimes and prolonged isolation, the need to consider health alongside security, known health inequalities within prisoner groups, and an ageing and ethnically diverse population (both groups disproportionately affected by COVID). The aim of this paper is to contribute to emerging research on the impact of COVID-19 on prison healthcare. METHODS We conducted 44 in depth interviews (over phone or video) across three groups: prison leavers, healthcare staff and decision makers, between July and December 2021. Framework analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Three themes were found. First, we found that Covid-19 had a significant impact on prison healthcare which involved reduced access and changes to how healthcare was delivered. This affected the health of prisoners by exacerbating existing conditions, new conditions being undiagnosed and mental health needs increasing. Second, the pandemic impacted on healthcare staff through creation of stress, frustration and exhaustion due to minimal staffing levels in an already under-resourced system. Third, an emerging conflict was witnessed. People in prison felt neglected regarding their healthcare needs but staff reported doing the best they could in an unprecedented situation. Healthcare staff and decision makers felt that prison healthcare was seen as a poor relation when compared with healthcare in the community, with no extra resource or staffing for Covid-19 testing or vaccinations. CONCLUSION The Covid-19 pandemic has significantly impacted almost all aspects of prison healthcare in the UK. This includes delivery of healthcare by staff, receipt of it by people in prison and the management, planning and commissioning of it by decision makers. These three groups of people were all affected detrimentally but in vastly different ways, with some participants describing a sense of trauma. Health needs that were exacerbated or went unmet during Covid urgently need to be addressed in order to reduce health inequalities. In order for welfare and wellbeing to be maintained, and in some cases repaired, both prisoners and staff need to feel heard and recognised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Wainwright
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Sarah Senker
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Krysia Canvin
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Laura Sheard
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pickard Strange M, Booth A, Akiki M, Wieringa S, Shaw SE. The role of virtual consulting in developing environmentally sustainable healthcare: a systematic literature review (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e44823. [PMID: 37133914 DOI: 10.2196/44823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health systems globally need to rapidly set and achieve targets for reaching net zero carbon emissions. Virtual consulting (including video- and telephone-based consulting) is regarded as one means by which this might be achieved, largely through reduced patient travel. Little is currently known about the ways in which forms of virtual consulting might contribute to the net zero agenda or how countries may develop and implement programs at scale that can support increased environmental sustainability. OBJECTIVE In this paper, we asked, What is the impact of virtual consulting on environmental sustainability in health care? and What can we learn from current evaluations that can inform future reductions in carbon emissions? METHODS We conducted a systematic review of published literature according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus databases using key terms relating to "carbon footprint," "environmental impact," "telemedicine," and "remote consulting," using citation tracking to identify additional articles. The articles were screened, and full texts that met the inclusion criteria were obtained. Data on the approach to carbon footprinting reported reductions in emissions, and the opportunities and challenges associated with the environmental sustainability of virtual consultations were extracted into a spreadsheet, analyzed thematically, and theorized using the Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services framework to consider the various interacting influences, including environmental sustainability, that shape the adoption of virtual consulting services. RESULTS A total of 1672 papers were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 23 papers that focused on a range of virtual consulting equipment and platforms across different clinical conditions and services were included. The focus on the environmental sustainability potential of virtual consulting was unanimously reported through carbon savings achieved by a reduction in travel related to face-to-face appointments. The shortlisted papers used a range of methods and assumptions to determine carbon savings, reporting these using different units and across varied sample sizes. This limited the potential for comparison. Despite methodological inconsistencies, all papers concluded that virtual consulting significantly reduced carbon emissions. However, there was limited consideration of wider factors (eg, patient suitability, clinical indication, and organizational infrastructure) influencing the adoption, use, and spread of virtual consultations and the carbon footprint of the entire clinical pathway in which the virtual consultation was provided (eg, risk of missed diagnoses from virtual consultations that result in the need for subsequent in-person consultations or admissions). CONCLUSIONS There is overwhelming evidence that virtual consulting can reduce health care carbon emissions, largely through reducing travel related to in-person appointments. However, the current evidence fails to look at system factors associated with implementing virtual health care delivery and wider research into carbon emissions across the entire clinical pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Pickard Strange
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Booth
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Akiki
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sietse Wieringa
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sara E Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE, Alvarez Nishio A, Byng R, Clarke A, Dakin F, Faulkner S, Hemmings N, Husain L, Kalin A, Ladds E, Moore L, Rosen R, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Wherton J, Wieringa S. Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:47. [PMID: 36814638 PMCID: PMC7614213 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in-person care, with recurrent waves of COVID-19 and various post-pandemic backlogs. Methods Mixed-methods (mostly qualitative) case study across 11 general practices. Researchers-in-residence have built relationships with practices and become familiar with their contexts and activities; they are following their progress for two years via staff and patient interviews, documents and ethnography, and supporting improvement efforts through co-design. In this paper, we report baseline data. Results Reflecting our maximum-variety sampling strategy, the 11 practices vary in size, setting, ethos, staffing, population demographics and digital maturity, but share common contextual features-notably system-level stressors such as high workload and staff shortages, and UK's technical and regulatory infrastructure. We have identified both commonalities and differences between practices in terms of how they: 1] manage the 'digital front door' (access and triage) and balance demand and capacity; 2] strive for high standards of quality and safety; 3] ensure digital inclusion and mitigate wider inequalities; 4] support and train their staff (clinical and non-clinical), students and trainees; 5] select, install, pilot and use technologies and the digital infrastructure which support them; and 6] involve patients in their improvement efforts. Conclusions General practices' responses to pandemic-induced disruptive innovation appear unique and situated. We anticipate that by focusing on depth and detail, this longitudinal study will throw light on why a solution that works well in one practice does not work at all in another. As the study unfolds, we will explore how practices achieve timely diagnosis of urgent or serious illness and manage continuity of care, long-term conditions and complex needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara E. Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | | | - Aileen Clarke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Francesca Dakin
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Stuart Faulkner
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Laiba Husain
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Asli Kalin
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Emma Ladds
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Lucy Moore
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | | | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sietse Wieringa
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
- Centre for Sustainable Health Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, NO-0316, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE, Alvarez Nishio A, Byng R, Clarke A, Dakin F, Faulkner S, Hemmings N, Husain L, Kalin A, Ladds E, Moore L, Rosen R, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Wherton J, Wieringa S. Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:47. [PMID: 36814638 PMCID: PMC7614213 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13290.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in-person care, with recurrent waves of COVID-19 and various post-pandemic backlogs. METHODS Mixed-methods (mostly qualitative) case study across 11 general practices. Researchers-in-residence have built relationships with practices and become familiar with their contexts and activities; they are following their progress for two years via staff and patient interviews, documents and ethnography, and supporting improvement efforts through co-design. In this paper, we report baseline data. RESULTS Reflecting our maximum-variety sampling strategy, the 11 practices vary in size, setting, ethos, staffing, population demographics and digital maturity, but share common contextual features-notably system-level stressors such as high workload and staff shortages, and UK's technical and regulatory infrastructure. We have identified both commonalities and differences between practices in terms of how they: 1] manage the 'digital front door' (access and triage) and balance demand and capacity; 2] strive for high standards of quality and safety; 3] ensure digital inclusion and mitigate wider inequalities; 4] support and train their staff (clinical and non-clinical), students and trainees; 5] select, install, pilot and use technologies and the digital infrastructure which support them; and 6] involve patients in their improvement efforts. CONCLUSIONS General practices' responses to pandemic-induced disruptive innovation appear unique and situated. We anticipate that by focusing on depth and detail, this longitudinal study will throw light on why a solution that works well in one practice does not work at all in another. As the study unfolds, we will explore how practices achieve timely diagnosis of urgent or serious illness and manage continuity of care, long-term conditions and complex needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara E. Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | | | - Aileen Clarke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Francesca Dakin
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Stuart Faulkner
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Laiba Husain
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Asli Kalin
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Emma Ladds
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Lucy Moore
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | | | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sietse Wieringa
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OXFORDSHIRE, OX2 6GG, UK
- Centre for Sustainable Health Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, NO-0316, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hughes G, Moore L, Maniatopoulos G, Wherton J, Wood GW, Greenhalgh T, Shaw S. Theorising the shift to video consulting in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analysis of a mixed methods study using practice theory. Soc Sci Med 2022; 311:115368. [PMID: 36152402 PMCID: PMC9472890 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
We studied video consulting in the National Health Service during 2020-2021 through video interviews, an online survey and online discussions with people who had provided and participated in such consultations. Video consulting had previously been used for selected groups in limited settings in the UK. The pandemic created a seismic shift in the context for remote consulting, in which video transformed from a niche technology typically introduced by individual clinicians committed to innovation and quality improvement to offering what many felt was the only safe way to deliver certain types of healthcare. A new practice emerged: a co-constitution of technology and healthcare made possible by new configurations of equipment, connectivity and physical spaces. Despite heterogeneous service settings and previous experiences of video consulting, we found certain kinds of common changes had made video consulting possible. We used practice theory to analyse these changes, interpreting the commonalities found in our data as changes in purpose, material arrangements and a relaxing of rules about security, confidentiality and location of consultations. The practice of video consulting was equivocal. Accounts of, and preferences for, video consulting varied as did the extent to which it was sustained after initial take-up. People made sense of video consulting in different ways, ranging from interpreting video as offering a new modality of healthcare for the future to a sub-optimal, temporary alternative to in-person care. Despite these variations, video consulting became a recognisable social phenomenon, albeit neither universally adopted nor consistently sustained. The nature of this social change offers new perspectives on processes of implementation and spread and scale-up. Our findings have important implications for the future of video consulting. We emphasise the necessity for viable material arrangements and a continued shared interpretation of the meaning of video consulting for the practice to continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Hughes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| | - Lucy Moore
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Gary W Wood
- Independent Research Consultant, Birmingham, UK
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wherton J, Greenhalgh T, Hughes G, Shaw SE. The role of information infrastructures in scaling up video consultations during Covid-19: a mixed-methods case study into opportunity, disruption and exposure (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e42431. [PMID: 36282978 PMCID: PMC9651004 DOI: 10.2196/42431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Until COVID-19, implementation and uptake of video consultations in health care was slow. However, the pandemic created a “burning platform” for scaling up such services. As health care organizations look to expand and maintain the use of video in the “new normal,” it is important to understand infrastructural influences and changes that emerged during the pandemic and that may influence sustainability going forward. Objective This study aims to draw lessons from 4 National Health Service (NHS) organizations on how information infrastructures shaped, and were shaped by, the rapid scale-up of video consultations during COVID-19. Methods A mixed methods case study of 4 NHS trusts in England was conducted before and during the pandemic. Data comprised 90 interviews with 49 participants (eg, clinicians, managers, administrators, and IT support), ethnographic field notes, and video consultation activity data. We sought examples of infrastructural features and challenges related to the rapid scale-up of video. Analysis was guided by Gkeredakis et al’s 3 perspectives on crisis and digital change: as opportunity (for accelerated innovation and removal of barriers to experimentation), disruption (to organizational practices, generating new dependencies and risks), and exposure (of vulnerabilities in both people and infrastructure). Results Before COVID-19, there was a strong policy push for video consultations as a way of delivering health care efficiently. However, the spread of video was slow, and adopting clinicians described their use as ad hoc rather than business as usual. When the pandemic hit, video was rapidly scaled up. The most rapid increase in use was during the first month of the pandemic (March-April 2020), from an average of 8 video consultations per week to 171 per week at each site. Uptake continued to increase during the pandemic, averaging approximately 800 video consultations per week by March 2021. From an opportunity perspective, participants talked about changes to institutional elements of infrastructure, which had historically restricted the introduction and use of video. This was supported by an “organizing vision” for video, bringing legitimacy and support. Perspectives on disruption centered on changes to social, technical, and material work environments and the emergence of new patterns of action. Retaining positive elements of such change required a judicious balance between managerial (top-down) and emergent (bottom-up) approaches. Perspectives on exposure foregrounded social and technical impediments to video consulting. This highlighted the need to attend to the materiality and dependability of the installed base, as well as the social and cultural context of use. Conclusions For sustained adoption at scale, health care organizations need to enable incremental systemic change and flexibility through agile governance and knowledge transfer pathways, support process multiplicity within virtual clinic workflows, attend to the materiality and dependability of the IT infrastructure within and beyond organizational boundaries, and maintain an overall narrative within which the continued use of video can be framed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Hughes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sara E Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alami H, Lehoux P, Shaw SE, Papoutsi C, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Fortin JP. Virtual Care and the Inverse Care Law: Implications for Policy, Practice, Research, Public and Patients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191710591. [PMID: 36078313 PMCID: PMC9518297 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Virtual care spread rapidly at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Restricting in-person contact contributed to reducing the spread of infection and saved lives. However, the benefits of virtual care were not evenly distributed within and across social groups, and existing inequalities became exacerbated for those unable to fully access to, or benefit from virtual services. This "perspective" paper discusses the extent to which challenges in virtual care access and use in the context of COVID-19 follow the Inverse Care Law. The latter stipulates that the availability and quality of health care is inversely proportionate to the level of population health needs. We highlight the inequalities affecting some disadvantaged populations' access to, and use of public and private virtual care, and contrast this with a utopian vision of technology as the "solution to everything". In public and universal health systems, the Inverse Care Law may manifests itself in access issues, capacity, and/or lack of perceived benefit to use digital technologies, as well as in data poverty. For commercial "Direct-To-Consumer" services, all of the above may be encouraged via a consumerist (i.e., profit-oriented) approach, limited and episodic services, or the use of low direct cost platforms. With virtual care rapidly growing, we set out ways forward for policy, practice, and research to ensure virtual care benefits for everyone, which include: (1) pay more attention to "capabilities" supporting access and use of virtual care; (2) consider digital technologies as a basic human right that should be automatically taken into account, not only in health policies, but also in social policies; (3) take more seriously the impact of the digital economy on equity, notably through a greater state involvement in co-constructing "public health value" through innovation; and (4) reconsider the dominant digital innovation research paradigm to better recognize the contexts, factors, and conditions that influence access to and use of virtual care by different groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassane Alami
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Pascale Lehoux
- Center for Public Health Research and Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Sara E. Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Faculty of Health, Plymouth University, Plymouth PL6 8BX, UK
| | - Jean-Paul Fortin
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1J 2G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Greenhalgh T, Shaw SE, Alvarez Nishio A, Booth A, Byng R, Clarke A, Dakin F, Davies R, Faulkner S, Hemmings N, Husain L, Kalin A, Ladds E, Moore L, Rosen R, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Wherton J, Wieringa S. Protocol: Remote care as the 'new normal'? Multi-site case study in UK general practice. NIHR OPEN RESEARCH 2022; 2:46. [PMID: 37881300 PMCID: PMC10593351 DOI: 10.3310/nihropenres.13289.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Following a pandemic-driven shift to remote service provision, UK general practices offer telephone, video or online consultation options alongside face-to-face. This study explores practices' varied experiences over time as they seek to establish remote forms of accessing and delivering care. Methods This protocol is for a mixed-methods multi-site case study with co-design and national stakeholder engagement. 11 general practices were selected for diversity in geographical location, size, demographics, ethos, and digital maturity. Each practice has a researcher-in-residence whose role is to become familiar with its context and activity, follow it longitudinally for two years using interviews, public-domain documents and ethnography, and support improvement efforts. Research team members meet regularly to compare and contrast across cases. Practice staff are invited to join online learning events. Patient representatives work locally within their practice patient involvement groups as well as joining an online patient learning set or linking via a non-digital buddy system. NHS Research Ethics Approval has been granted. Governance includes a diverse independent advisory group with lay chair. We also have policy in-reach (national stakeholders sit on our advisory group) and outreach (research team members sit on national policy working groups). Results anticipated We expect to produce rich narratives of contingent change over time, addressing cross-cutting themes including access, triage and capacity; digital and wider inequities; quality and safety of care (e.g. continuity, long-term condition management, timely diagnosis, complex needs); workforce and staff wellbeing (including non-clinical staff, students and trainees); technologies and digital infrastructure; patient perspectives; and sustainability (e.g. carbon footprint). Conclusion By using case study methods focusing on depth and detail, we hope to explain why digital solutions that work well in one practice do not work at all in another. We plan to inform policy and service development through inter-sectoral network-building, stakeholder workshops and topic-focused policy briefings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sara E Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Amy Booth
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Aileen Clarke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Francesca Dakin
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Stuart Faulkner
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | - Laiba Husain
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Asli Kalin
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Emma Ladds
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Lucy Moore
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | | | | | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sietse Wieringa
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
- Centre for Sustainable Health Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Implementing video group consultations in general practice during COVID-19: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e483-e491. [PMID: 35636969 PMCID: PMC9256071 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Group consultations have been gaining ground as a novel approach to service delivery. When in-person care was restricted owing to COVID-19, general practice staff began delivering group consultations remotely over video. Aim To examine how multiple interacting influences underpinned implementation and delivery of video group consultations (VGCs). Design and setting Qualitative study in general practice in England. Method a) 32 semi-structured interviews with patients, clinical, and non-clinical staff (from eight GP surgeries in total), NHS policymakers and programme managers, and other stakeholders; b) observation in relevant training and operational meetings; and c) three co-design workshops (21 participants). Thematic analysis was informed by the Planning and Evaluating Remote Consulting Services (PERCS) framework. Results In the first year of the pandemic, VGCs focused on supporting those with long-term conditions or other shared health and social needs. Most patients welcomed clinical and peer input, and the opportunity to access their practice remotely during lockdown. However, not everyone agreed to engage in group-based care or was able to access IT equipment. At practice level, significant work was needed to deliver VGCs, such as setting up the digital infrastructure, gaining team buy-in, developing new patient-facing online facilitation roles, managing background operational processes, protecting online confidentiality, and ensuring professional indemnity cover. Training provided nationally was seen as instrumental in capacity building for VGC implementation. Conclusion Small scale VGC implementation addressed unmet need during the pandemic. However, embedding VGCs in routine care requires rethinking of operational, infrastructural, and clinical processes. Additional research on costs and benefits at service and patient level is needed.
Collapse
|
18
|
Pinnock H, Murphie P, Vogiatzis I, Poberezhets V. Telemedicine and virtual respiratory care in the era of COVID-19. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00111-2022. [PMID: 35891622 PMCID: PMC9131135 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00111-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The World Health Organization defines telemedicine as “an interaction between a health care provider and a patient when the two are separated by distance”. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a dramatic shift to telephone and video consulting for follow up and routine ambulatory care for reasons of infection control. Short Message Service (“text”) messaging has proved a useful adjunct to remote consulting allowing transfer of photographs and documents. Maintaining non-communicable diseases care is a core component of pandemic preparedness and telemedicine has developed to enable (for example) remote monitoring of sleep apnoea, telemonitoring of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, digital support for asthma self-management, remote delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation. There are multiple exemplars of telehealth instigated rapidly to provide care for people with COVID-19, to manage the spread of the pandemic, or to maintain safe routine diagnostic or treatment services.Despite many positive examples of equivalent functionality and safety, there remain questions about the impact of remote delivery of care on rapport and the longer-term impact on patient/professional relationships. Although telehealth has the potential to contribute to universal health coverage by providing cost-effective accessible care, there is a risk of increasing social health inequalities if the “digital divide” excludes those most in need of care. As we emerge from the pandemic, the balance of remote versus face-to-face consulting, and the specific role of digital health in different clinical and healthcare contexts will evolve. What is clear is that telemedicine in one form or another will be part of the “new norm”.
Collapse
|
19
|
Clinical risk in remote consultations in general practice: findings from in-Covid-19 pandemic qualitative research. BJGP Open 2022; 6:BJGPO.2021.0204. [PMID: 35487581 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Covid-19 pandemic-related rise in remote consulting raises questions about the nature and type of risks in remote general practice AIM: To develop an empirically-based and theory-informed taxonomy of risks associated with remote consultations. DESIGN AND SETTING Qualitative sub-study of data selected from the wider datasets of three large, multi-site, mixed-method studies of remote care in general practice prior to and during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK METHOD: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a total of 176 clinicians, and 45 patients. We analysed data thematically, taking account of an existing framework of domains of clinical risk. RESULTS The Covid-19 pandemic brought changes to estates (eg, how waiting rooms were used), access pathways, technologies, and interpersonal interactions. Six domains of risk were evident in relation to[1] practice organisation and set-up (including digital inequalities of access, technology failure and reduced service efficiency); [2] communication and the therapeutic relationship (including a shift to more transactional consultations); [3] quality of clinical care (including missed diagnoses, safeguarding challenges, over-investigation and over-treatment); [4] increased burden on the patient (eg, to self-examine and navigate between services); [5] reduced opportunities for screening and managing the social determinants of health; and [6] workforce (including increased clinician stress and fewer opportunities for learning). CONCLUSION Notwithstanding potential benefits, if remote consultations are to work safely, risks must be actively mitigated by measures that include digital inclusion strategies, enhanced safety-netting and training and support for staff.
Collapse
|
20
|
Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? Qualitative study in UK. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:e351-e360. [DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Fewer than 1% of UK general practice consultations occur by video. Aim: To explain why video consultations are not more widely used in general practice. Design and setting: Analysis of a sub-sample of data from three mixed-method case studies of remote consultation services in various UK settings 2019-2021. Methods: The dataset included interviews and focus groups with 121 participants from primary care (33 patients, 55 GPs, 11 other clinicians, 9 managers, 4 support staff, 4 national policymakers, 5 technology industry). Data were transcribed, coded thematically and then analysed using the Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultations (PERCS) Framework. Results: With few exceptions, video consultations were either never adopted or soon abandoned in general practice despite a strong policy push, short-term removal of regulatory and financial barriers and advances in functionality, dependability and usability of video technologies (though some products remained “fiddly” and unreliable). The relative advantage of video was perceived as minimal for most of the case load of general practice, since many presenting problems could be sorted adequately and safely by telephone and in-person assessment was considered necessary for the remainder. Some patients found video appointments convenient, appropriate and reassuring but others found therapeutic presence was only achieved in person. Video sometimes added value for out-of-hours and nursing home consultations and statutory functions (e.g. death certification). Conclusion: Efforts to introduce video consultations in general practice should focus on situations where this modality has a clear relative advantage (e.g. strong patient or clinician preference, remote localities, out-of-hours services, nursing homes).
Collapse
|