Virtual Reality in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Patient Emotional and Physiologic Responses

Leveraging AI for the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorder: Current trends and future prospects

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represents a promising frontier in healthcare. This review explores the current landscape and future prospects of AI technologies in ASD diagnostics and interventions. AI enables early detection and personalized assessment of ASD through the analysis of diverse data sources such as behavioural patterns, neuroimaging, genetics, and electronic health records. Machine learning algorithms exhibit high accuracy in distinguishing ASD from neurotypical development and other developmental disorders, facilitating timely interventions. Furthermore, AI-driven therapeutic interventions, including augmentative communication systems, virtual reality-based training, and robot-assisted therapies, show potential in improving social interactions and communication skills in individuals with ASD. Despite challenges such as data privacy and interpretability, the future of AI in ASD holds promise for refining diagnostic accuracy, deploying telehealth platforms, and tailoring treatment plans. By harnessing AI, clinicians can enhance ASD care delivery, empower patients, and advance our understanding of this complex condition.

Virtual Reality Distraction Is No Better Than Simple Distraction Techniques for Reducing Pain and Anxiety During Pediatric Orthopaedic Outpatient Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In-office procedures can be painful and anxiety-provoking for pediatric patients. Minimizing such pain and anxiety in children improves the patient experience and promotes a rewarding and productive patient-caregiver-provider relationship, which may for some young patients be their first memorable encounter with the healthcare system. Although virtual reality (VR) techniques have proven to be helpful in minimizing pain and anxiety during procedures in pediatric intensive care settings, it remains unclear how VR affects objective and subjective measures of pain and anxiety in children undergoing in-office orthopaedic procedures such as cast removal or percutaneous pin removal after fracture healing.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Is a VR gaming simulation more effective than either of two forms of noninteractive visual distraction (VR goggles or tablet computer displaying a noninteractive video) for reducing (1) objective measures of pain and anxiety and (2) subjective measures of pain and anxiety in children undergoing in-office cast removal or percutaneous pin removal?

METHODS

This study was a randomized controlled trial with two parallel, separately analyzed cohorts: children undergoing in-office cast removal or in-office percutaneous pin removal at a single urban tertiary institution. We approached eligible patients who were scheduled to undergo outpatient cast or percutaneous pin removal and who met prespecified inclusion criteria. We enrolled until 105 patients were available for analysis in each of the cast removal and pin removal cohorts. Of note, the study institution was in an urban epicenter of the coronavirus-19 pandemic, and clinical research was paused sporadically, which resulted in a longer-than-expected enrollment period. In the cast removal cohort, all patients were eligible for inclusion and were enrolled and randomized into one of three groups: VR gaming simulation (n = 37), VR goggles with a noninteractive video (n = 36), or a tablet computer with the same noninteractive video (n = 40). Eleven percent (4), 8% (3), and 3% (1) withdrew from each of the three intervention groups, respectively. In the pin removal cohort, all patients were eligible for inclusion and were enrolled and randomized into the same three groups (37, 44, and 41 patients, respectively). In the pin removal group, 14% (5), 18% (8), and 10% (4) withdrew from each of the three intervention groups, respectively. In all, 235 patients were enrolled in the study and 210 patients (mean ± SD age 9 ± 3 years; 48% [100] girls) were included in the final analyses. There were no clinically important differences in age, gender, preprocedure pain, or anxiety among the intervention groups. Primary outcomes included preprocedure-to-maximum heart rate increase (objective measure) and preprocedure and postprocedure pain and anxiety using a VAS (subjective measures). One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons were used to calculate between-group differences for the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no intervention-level groupwise differences between VR goggles with an interactive game, VR goggles with a noninteractive video, or the tablet computer with the same video in preprocedure-to-maximum heart rate increase in the cast removal cohort (18 ± 21 bpm versus 14 ± 11 bpm versus 20 ± 16 bpm, respectively; largest mean difference -6 bpm [95% CI -16 to 3]; p = 0.36) or pin removal cohort (27 ± 20 bpm versus 23 ± 12 bpm versus 24 ± 19 bpm, respectively; largest mean difference 4 bpm [95% CI -7 to 14]; p = 0.99). Similarly, there were no intervention-level groupwise differences in preprocedure to postprocedure VAS pain in the cast removal cohort (1 ± 1 versus 1 ± 2 versus 0 ± 2, respectively; largest mean difference 0 points [95% CI 0 to 1]; p = 0.89) or pin removal cohort (0 ± 3 versus 2 ± 3 versus 0 ± 3 points, respectively; largest mean difference 1 point [95% CI 0 to 3]; p = 0.13). Finally, there were no intervention-level groupwise differences between the same intervention groups in preprocedure to postprocedure VAS anxiety in the cast removal cohort (-2 ± 2 versus -1 ± 2 versus -1 ± 2 points, respectively; largest mean difference -1 point [95% CI -2 to 1]; p = 0.63) or pin removal cohort (-3 ± 3 versus -4 ± 4 versus -3 ± 3 points, respectively; largest mean difference -1 point [95% CI -2 to 1]; p = 0.99).

CONCLUSION

During in-office cast and pin removal in pediatric patients, simple distraction techniques such as tablet video viewing are as effective as higher-fidelity VR headset video and interactive games in minimizing objective measures of procedural pain and subjective measures of pain and anxiety. Because of these findings and because of the associated costs, implementation logistics, and variable tolerance by young patients, widespread use of VR distraction techniques in the pediatric orthopaedic outpatient setting is unnecessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Virtual and augmented reality in intensive care medicine: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are rapidly developing technologies that offer a wide range of applications and enable users to experience digitally rendered content in both physical and virtual space. Although the number of studies about the different use of VR and AR increases year by year, a systematic overview of the applications of these innovative technologies in intensive care medicine is lacking. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a detailed summary of how VR and AR are currently being used in various areas of intensive care medicine.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed until 1st March 2023 to identify the currently existing evidence for different applications of VR and AR for both health care providers in the intensive care unit and children or adults, who were in an intensive care unit because of a critical illness.

RESULTS

After screening the literature, a total of 59 studies were included. Of note, a substantial number of publications consists of case reports, study plans or are lacking a control group. Furthermore, study designs are seldom comparable. However, there have been a variety of use cases for VR and AR that researchers have explored. They can help intensive care unit (ICU) personnel train, plan, and perform difficult procedures such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, vascular punctures, endotracheal intubation or percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Patients might benefit from VR during invasive interventions and ICU stay by alleviating stress or pain. Furthermore, it enables contact with relatives and can also assist patients in their rehabilitation programs.

CONCLUSION

Both, VR and AR, offer multiple possibilities to improve current care, both from the perspective of the healthcare professional and the patient. It can be assumed that VR and AR will develop further and their application in health care will increase.

Extended Reality Use in Paediatric Intensive Care: A Scoping Review

Background: Extended reality (XR) technology such as virtual and augmented reality is increasingly being utilised in paediatric medicine due to its role in medical education and reported positive impacts on outcomes including pain, anxiety, and sleep. To the author's knowledge, no previous reviews investigating the use of XR in paediatric intensive care have been undertaken. Objectives: To scope the use of XR in paediatric intensive care, and assess its barriers to adoption, including safety considerations, cleaning and infection control. Eligibility criteria: All articles of any methodological design discussing the use of XR within paediatric intensive and critical care were included. Sources of evidence: Four databases (EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed) and Google Scholar were searched without any limitations on publication year. Charting methods: Data was extracted into Microsoft Excel by two authors independently (AG & SF) and cross-checked for completeness. Results: One hundred and eighty-eight articles were originally identified. Following the application of eligibility criteria 16 articles utilising XR in clinical interventions (n = 7) and medical education (n = 9) were included. Articles utilised VR and AR for highly variable purposes within both medical education (eg disaster preparedness, intubation) and clinical interventions (eg decrease pain, nausea, anxiety and improve Glasgow Coma Scale). Conclusions: While research into the use of XR in paediatric intensive care is still in its infancy it has increased dramatically over the past 5 years within two key areas. Firstly, in healthcare education, to assist in the acquisition of PICU-specific knowledge and practice of skills such as intubation of difficult airways. Secondly, studies have evaluated and demonstrated that with appropriate use, VR appears to be a safe and feasible intervention to decrease pain and anxiety in PICU patients.

Virtual and augmented reality in critical care medicine: the patient's, clinician's, and researcher's perspective

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are aspiring, new technologies with increasing use in critical care medicine. While VR fully immerses the user into a virtual three-dimensional space, AR adds overlaid virtual elements into a real-world environment. VR and AR offer great potential to improve critical care medicine for patients, relatives and health care providers. VR may help to ameliorate anxiety, stress, fear, and pain for the patient. It may assist patients in mobilisation and rehabilitation and can improve communication between all those involved in the patient's care. AR can be an effective tool to support continuous education of intensive care medicine providers, and may complement traditional learning methods to acquire key practical competences such as central venous line placement, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation device management or endotracheal intubation. Currently, technical, human, and ethical challenges remain. The adaptation and integration of VR/AR modalities into useful clinical applications that can be used routinely on the ICU is challenging. Users may experience unwanted side effects (so-called "cybersickness") during VR/AR sessions, which may limit its applicability. Furthermore, critically ill patients are one of the most vulnerable patient groups and warrant special ethical considerations if new technologies are to be introduced into their daily care. To date, most studies involving AR/VR in critical care medicine provide only a low level of evidence due to their research design. Here we summarise background information, current developments, and key considerations that should be taken into account for future scientific investigations in this field.