1
|
Bielfeld AP, Schwarze JE, Verpillat P, Lispi M, Fischer R, Hayward B, Chuderland D, D'Hooghe T, Krussel JS. Effectiveness of recombinant human FSH: recombinant human LH combination treatment versus recombinant human FSH alone for assisted reproductive technology in women aged 35-40 years. Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 48:103725. [PMID: 38593745 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION According to real-world data, is recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) combined with recombinant human LH (r-hLH) or r-hFSH alone more effective for women of advanced maternal age (AMA) in terms of live birth? DESIGN Non-interventional study comparing the effectiveness of r-hFSH and recombinant r-hLH (2:1 ratio) versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation during ART treatment in women aged 35-40 years, using real-world data from the Deutsches IVF-Register. RESULTS Overall clinical pregnancy (29.8%, 95% CI 28.2 to 31.6 versus 27.8%, 95% CI 26.5 to 29.2) and live birth (20.3%, 95% CI 18.7 to 21.8 versus 18.0%, 95% CI 16.6 to 19.4) rates were not significantly different between the combined r-hFSH and r-hLH group and the r-hFSH alone group (P = 0.269 and P = 0.092, respectively). Treatment effect was significantly higher for combined r-hFSH and r-hLH compared with r-hFSH alone for clinical pregnancy (33.1%, 95% CI 31.0 to 35.0 versus 28.5%, 95% CI 26.6 to 30.4; P = 0.001, not adjusted for multiplicity) and live birth (22.5%, 95% CI 20.5 to 24.2 versus 19.4%, 95% CI 17.6 to 20.9; P = 0.014, not adjusted for multiplicity) in a post-hoc analysis of women with five to 14 oocytes retrieved (used as a surrogate for normal ovarian reserve), highlighting the potential benefits of combined r-hFSH and r-hLH for ovarian stimulation in women aged 35-40 years with normal ovarian reserve. CONCLUSIONS Women of AMA with normal ovarian response benefit from treatment with combined r-hFSH and r-hLH in a 2:1 ratio versus r-hFSH alone in terms of live birth rate. The effectiveness of treatments is best assessed by RCTs; however, real-world data are valuable for examining the effectiveness of fertility treatment, especially among patient groups that are not well represented in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra P Bielfeld
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UniKiD Center for Reproductive Medicine (UniKiD), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Juan-Enrique Schwarze
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany.
| | - Patrice Verpillat
- Global Epidemiology, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany
| | - Monica Lispi
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany; PhD School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale A. Allegri 9. 42121, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | | | - Brooke Hayward
- EMD Serono, One Technology Place, Rockland, Massachusetts, 02370, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Dana Chuderland
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany; Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University Medical School, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Jan-Steffan Krussel
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UniKiD Center for Reproductive Medicine (UniKiD), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hugues JN. Subtle perturbations of ovarian steroidogenesis in patients classified as Poseidon Group 3. Which consequences for therapeutic strategy? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1231585. [PMID: 38384970 PMCID: PMC10879926 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1231585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The optimal strategy for stimulation of young women with a low ovarian reserve is still a challenging issue because the physio-pathogeny of this disorder is often unknown. As androgen production by the ovary plays a crucial role in folliculogenesis, it was tempting to speculate that subtle perturbations in ovarian steroidogenesis might participate to the low responsiveness to gonadotrophins. Indeed, in vitro analysis of human luteinized granulosa cells has recently provided evidence for some enzymatic deficits in steroidogenesis and altered response to gonadotrophins. Therefore, improving androgen environment of women classified in Poseidon Group 3 should be considered. In this clinical situation, the potential benefit of androgen supplementation or stimulation of theca cells by LH-activity products are respectively discussed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chang JC, Yi YC, Chen YF, Guu HF, Kung HF, Chen LY, Chuan ST, Chang YM, Chen MJ. A direct healthcare cost analysis of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 309:699-706. [PMID: 38099955 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07309-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We have previously published a retrospective matched-case control study comparing the effect of recombinant LH (r-hLH) versus highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) supplementation on the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The result from that study showed that the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was significantly higher in the r-hLH group (53% vs. 64%, p = 0.02). In this study, we aim to do a cost analysis between these two groups based on our previous study. METHODS The analysis consisted of 425 IVF and ICSI cycles in our previous study. There were 259 cycles in the r-hFSH + hMG group and 166 cycles in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group. The total cost related to the treatment of each patient was recorded. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) were performed and created. RESULTS The total treatment cost per patient was significantly higher in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group than in the r-hFSH + hMG group ($4550 ± 798.86 vs. $4290 ± 734.6, p = 0.003). However, the mean cost per live birth in the r-hFSH + hMG group was higher at $8052, vs. $7059 in the r-hFSH + r-hLH group. The CEAC showed that treatment with hFSH + r-hLH proved to be more cost-effective than treatment with r-hFSH + hMG. Willingness-to-pay was evident when considering a hypothetical threshold of $18,513, with the r-hFSH + r-hLH group exhibiting a 99% probability of being considered cost-effective. CONCLUSION The cost analysis showed that recombinant LH is more cost-effective than hMG supplementation on r-hFSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui-Chun Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chiao Yi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Fang Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan
| | - Hwa-Fen Guu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Fan Kung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yu Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Ting Chuan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Mei Chang
- Department of Statistics, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jer Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Xitun District, Taichung City, 407, Taiwan.
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Romano M, Cirillo F, Ravaioli N, Morenghi E, Negri L, Ozgur B, Albani E, Levi-Setti PE. Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in TESE-ICSI cycles: A comparison between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Andrology 2023. [PMID: 38108554 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with testicular sperm extraction in obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia are limited, and few studies have addressed obstetric and neonatal outcomes. DESIGN This study analyzed couples who underwent testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles for obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia to determine whether impaired spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia patients would lead to worse reproductive outcomes and higher rates of pregnancy complications and fetal anomalies. This study is a retrospective, single-center analysis of all testicular sperm cycles performed between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2020. RESULTS A total of 392 couples were considered in the study, leading to 1066 induction cycles, 620 (58.2%) from patients with obstructive azoospermia and 446 (41.8%) from non-obstructive azoospermia. The cumulative delivery rate did not significantly differ between the two groups (34% vs. 31%; p = 0.326). The miscarriage rate was similar between obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Fertilization rate instead showed a statistically significant difference (obstructive azoospermia: 66.1 ± 25.7 vs. non-obstructive azoospermia: 56.1 ± 27.0; p < 0.001). The overall maternal complication rate in the non-obstructive azoospermia group was higher (10.7% vs. 18.4%; p = 0.035), but there was no statistical significance for each pathology. There was no statistical difference in gestational age between the two groups for both single and twin pregnancies. Seven cases of congenital defects occurred in the obstructive azoospermia group, while two cases occurred in the non-obstructive azoospermia group. CONCLUSIONS Despite impaired spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia patients, there were no substantial differences in reproductive outcomes compared to patients with obstructive azoospermia, even in terms of obstetric safety and neonatal well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Romano
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Cirillo
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Noemi Ravaioli
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital of Lugo (RA), Lugo, Italy
| | - Emanuela Morenghi
- Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano Negri
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Bulbul Ozgur
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Albani
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
- Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yi Y, Fu J, Xie S, Zhang Q, Xu B, Wang Y, Wang Y, Li B, Zhao G, Li J, Li Y, Zhao J. Association between ovarian reserve and spontaneous miscarriage and their shared genetic architecture. Hum Reprod 2023; 38:2247-2258. [PMID: 37713654 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Can potential mechanisms involved in the likely concurrence of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and miscarriage be identified using genetic data? SUMMARY ANSWER Concurrence between ovarian reserve and spontaneous miscarriage was observed, and may be attributed to shared genetic risk loci enriched in antigen processing and presentation and autoimmune disease pathways. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Previous studies have shown that lower serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are associated with increased risk of embryo aneuploidy and spontaneous miscarriage, although findings have not been consistent across all studies. A recent meta-analysis suggested that the association between DOR and miscarriage may not be causal, but rather a result of shared underlying causes such as clinical conditions or past exposure. Motivated by this hypothesis, we conducted the present analysis to explore the concurrence between DOR and miscarriage, and to investigate potential mechanisms using genetic data. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Three data sources were used in the study: the clinical IVF data were retrospectively collected from an academically affiliated Reproductive Medicine Center (17 786 cycles included); the epidemiological data from the UK Biobank (UKB), which is a large-scale, population-based, prospective cohort study (35 316 white women included), were analyzed; and individual-level genotype data from the UKB were extracted for further analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS There were three modules of analysis. First, clinical IVF data were used to test the association between ovarian reserve biomarkers and the subsequent early spontaneous miscarriage risk. Second, the UKB data were used to test the association of spontaneous miscarriage history and early menopause. Third, individual-level genotype data from the UKB were analyzed to identify specific pleiotropic genes which affect the development of miscarriage and menopause. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the analysis of clinical IVF data, the risk of early spontaneous miscarriage was 1.57 times higher in the group with AMH < 1.1 ng/ml group (P < 0.001), 1.62 times for antral follicular count <5 (P < 0.001), and 1.39 times for FSH ≥10 mIU/ml (P < 0.001) in comparison with normal ovarian reserve groups. In the analysis of UKB data, participants with a history of three or more miscarriages had a one-third higher risk of experiencing early menopause (odds ratio: 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.49, P < 0.001), compared with participants without spontaneous miscarriage history. We identified 158 shared genetic risk loci that affect both miscarriage and menopause, which enrichment analysis showed were involved in antigen processing and presentation and autoimmune disease pathways. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The analyses of the UKB data were restricted to participants of European ancestry, as 94.6% of the cohort were of white ethnicity. Further studies are needed in non-white populations. Additionally, maternal age at the time of spontaneous miscarriage was not available in the UKB cohort, therefore we adjusted for age at baseline assessment in the models instead. It is known that miscarriage rate in IVF is higher compared to natural conception, highlighting a need for caution when generalizing our findings from the IVF cohort to the general population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our findings have implications for IVF clinicians in terms of patient counseling on the prognosis of IVF treatment, as well as for genetic counseling regarding miscarriage. Our results highlight the importance of further research on the shared genetic architecture and common pathophysiological basis of DOR and miscarriage, which may lead to new therapeutic opportunities. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by the Hunan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Talent Project (2020RC3060), the International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program (Talent-Introduction Program, YJ20220220), the fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M723564), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2023JJ41016). This work has been accepted for poster presentation at the 39th Annual Meeting of ESHRE, Copenhagen, Denmark, 25-28 June 2023 (Poster number: P-477). The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Yi
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Jing Fu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Shi Xie
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Qiong Zhang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Bin Xu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Yonggang Wang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Yijing Wang
- Department of Geriatrics, Bioinformatics Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bin Li
- Department of Geriatrics, Bioinformatics Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Centre for Medical Genetics & Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Guihu Zhao
- Department of Geriatrics, Bioinformatics Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Centre for Medical Genetics & Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jinchen Li
- Department of Geriatrics, Bioinformatics Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Centre for Medical Genetics & Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yanping Li
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| | - Jing Zhao
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Konstantinidou F, Placidi M, Di Emidio G, Stuppia L, Tatone C, Gatta V, Artini PG. Maternal MicroRNA Profile Changes When LH Is Added to the Ovarian Stimulation Protocol: A Pilot Study. EPIGENOMES 2023; 7:25. [PMID: 37873810 PMCID: PMC10594432 DOI: 10.3390/epigenomes7040025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
While the use of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) is an established practice, the use of luteinizing hormone (LH) remains debatable. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short, endogenous, non-coding transcripts that control a variety of cellular functions, such as gonadotrophin production and follicular development. The goal of this pilot study was to investigate whether the employment of recombinant LH (rLH) in ovarian stimulation protocols results in changes in the miRNA profiles in human oocytes. Patients were divided into two groups: seven received recombinant FSH (rFSH, 225 IU), and six received rFSH (150 IU) plus rLH (75 IU). MiRNA predesigned panels and real-time PCR technology were used to analyze the oocytes retrieved from the follicular ovarian retrieval. Among the miRNAs evaluated, a series of them evidenced upregulation or downregulation in their expression in the FSH plus LH group compared to the FSH group. Considering the results obtained from the functional and network analysis, the different maternal miRNA profiles in the two groups revealed a differential modulation of pathways involved in numerous biological functions. Overall, based on the pathways associated with most of these maternal miRNAs, the presence of LH may result in a different modulation of pathways regulating survival under the control of a Tp53-related mechanism. Interestingly, among the miRNAs differentially expressed in oocytes of the two groups, we have found miRNAs already investigated at ovarian, follicular, oocyte, and embryonic levels: hsa-miR-484, hsa-miR-222, hsa-miR-520d-5p, hsa-miRNA-17, hsa-miR-548, and hsa-miR-140. Thus, investigation into the role of these miRNAs in oocyte molecular pathways may help determine how LH affects oocyte competence and eventually leads to the clinical improvement of IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fani Konstantinidou
- Department of Psychological Health and Territorial Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (F.K.)
- Unit of Molecular Genetics, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Martina Placidi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (M.P.); (G.D.E.); (C.T.)
| | - Giovanna Di Emidio
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (M.P.); (G.D.E.); (C.T.)
| | - Liborio Stuppia
- Department of Psychological Health and Territorial Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (F.K.)
- Unit of Molecular Genetics, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Carla Tatone
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (M.P.); (G.D.E.); (C.T.)
| | - Valentina Gatta
- Department of Psychological Health and Territorial Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (F.K.)
- Unit of Molecular Genetics, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), “G. d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| | - Paolo Giovanni Artini
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ronchetti C, Cirillo F, Immediata V, Gargasole C, Scolaro V, Morenghi E, Albani E, Patrizio P, Levi-Setti PE. A Monocentric Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Single- and Double-Lumen Needles in Oocyte Retrieval Procedure in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Reprod Sci 2023; 30:2866-2875. [PMID: 37069472 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01232-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
The purpose was to determine any difference in outcomes, primarily in terms of number of retrieved oocytes per procedure, between two different needles used for oocytes retrieval procedure in Assisted Reproductive Technologies: the single-lumen needle (SLN) versus the double-lumen needle (DLN) with follicle flushing after aspiration. This randomized controlled trial included oocyte retrieval (OR) cycles for IVF and ICSI performed in 18 to 42-year-old women between March 2019 and January 2021 at a tertiary-care Fertility Center. A total of 200 ORs were randomized, 100 in each group. The mean number of retrieved oocytes was not different between groups (10.2 ± 6.5 for DLNs vs. 10.7 ± 7.0 for SLNs, p = 0.810). No significant differences were observed also in terms of number of retrieved oocytes/punctured follicles (83.0% ± 27.0% vs. 81.0% ± 22.0%, p = 0.916), number of retrieved oocytes/follicles at trigger (78.0% ± 29.0% vs. 78.0% ± 27.0%, p = 0.881), number of mature oocytes (7.6 ± 5.3 vs. 8.0 ± 5.1, p = 0.519), and pregnancy rate (27% vs. 23%, p = 0.514). However, the time required to retrieve each oocyte was longer using the DLN (1.5 ± 1.3 vs. 1.1 ± 0.9 minutes, p = 0.002). The present study confirmed the new perspectives on the sole use of SLNs in terms of saving time, without affecting the number of retrieved oocytes. Trial registration number and date of registration NCT03611907; July 26, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Ronchetti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Cirillo
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Immediata
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy
| | - Clara Gargasole
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Scolaro
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Morenghi
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Biostatistics Unit, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Albani
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Pasquale Patrizio
- University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Division Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre, Rozzano, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Italy.
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Pieve Emanuele, via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bielfeld AP, Schwarze JE, Verpillat P, Lispi M, Fischer R, Hayward B, Chuderland D, D'Hooghe T, Krussel JS. Effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH): recombinant human luteinizing hormone versus r-hFSH alone in assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles among women aged 35-40 years: A German database study. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 89:102350. [PMID: 37320996 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This non-interventional study compared the effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) and recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) (2:1 ratio) versus r-hFSH alone for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology treatment in women aged 35-40 years, using real-world data from the Deutsches IVF-Register (D·I·R). Numerically higher clinical pregnancy (29.8% [95% CI 28.2, 31.6] vs. 27.8% [26.5, 29.2]) and live birth (20.3% [18.7, 21.8] vs. 18.0% [16.6, 19.4]) rates were observed with r-hFSH:r-hLH versus r-hFSH alone. The treatment effect was consistently higher for r-hFSH:r-hLH compared with r-hFSH alone in terms of clinical pregnancy (relative risk [RR] 1.16 [1.05, 1.26]) and live birth (RR 1.16 [1.02, 1.31]) in a post-hoc analysis of women with 5-14 oocytes retrieved (used as a surrogate for normal ovarian reserve), highlighting the potential benefits of r-hFSH:r-hLH for OS in women aged 35-40 years with normal ovarian reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A P Bielfeld
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UniKiD Center for Reproductive Medicine (UniKiD), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| | - J E Schwarze
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany.
| | - P Verpillat
- Global Epidemiology, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany.
| | - M Lispi
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany; PhD School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale A. Allegri 9. 42121, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
| | - R Fischer
- Fertility Centre Hamburg, 20095, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - B Hayward
- EMD Serono, One Technology Place, Rockland, MA 02370, USA, and affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
| | - D Chuderland
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany.
| | - T D'Hooghe
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, Darmstadt, 64293, Germany; Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University Medical School, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
| | - J S Krussel
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, UniKiD Center for Reproductive Medicine (UniKiD), Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paffoni A, Cesana S, Corti L, Ballabio E, Salemi C, Kunderfranco A, Bianchi MC. Pregnancy rate in IVF patients with unexpected poor response to ovarian stimulation. Gynecol Endocrinol 2022; 38:736-741. [PMID: 35848405 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2022.2100339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether an unexpected poor response (cases with ≤3 oocytes) leads to a reduction in the pregnancy rate in IVF cycles compared to a suboptimal response (controls with 4-9 oocytes) in women with adequate ovarian reserve. METHODS A nested case-control study performed in a retrospective cohort of couples undergoing IVF at the Infertility Unit of the ASST Lariana. Cases and controls had adequate ovarian reserve and were matched 1:1 for female age and number of previous cycles. Cumulative clinical pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was the main outcome. RESULTS Overall, 113 cases and 113 matched controls were included; the median number of available oocytes was 2 and 6, respectively. The cumulative pregnancy rate per cycle was significantly reduced in cases compared to controls with a crude odds ratio = 0.45 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.28-0.82]. A binomial logistic model indicated that an increase in one oocyte increases the odds for cumulative pregnancy rate per cycle by 1.27 in women with 9 oocytes or less. The cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle in cases and controls, according to female age were respectively: 29% versus 54% in patients aged <35 years (p = 0.036); 22% versus 43% in patients aged 36-39 years (p = 0.048) and 11% versus 13% in patients 40-45 years old (p = 0.72). Patients belonging to older age groups showed decreasing probability of cumulative clinical pregnancy rates both among cases and controls group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The number of available oocytes significantly affects the probability of success in IVF cycles with unexpected impaired ovarian response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura Corti
- UOSD Infertility Unit, ASST Lariana, Como, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cirillo F, Costa P, Romano M, Negri L, Morenghi E, Albani E, Setti PEL. Is the lack of prior exposure to sperm antigens associated with worse neonatal and maternal outcomes? A 10 years single-center experience comparing ICSI-TESE pregnancies to ICSI pregnancies. Andrology 2022; 10:931-943. [PMID: 35485252 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nowadays pathogenesis of preeclampsia is still unknown. Among the different etiological hypotheses, some authors proposed that it might be due to an abnormal immunologic response to foreign fetal antigen derived from the father's sperm. Indeed, the fetus is considered a semi allograft, being one half paternally derived in its antigenicity, and the first pathogenic insult of preeclampsia may be an abnormal maternal immune response towards this semi-allogenic implant. In the context of Artificial Reproductive Techniques, it has been shown that the use of donor and surgically retrieved spermatozoa (e.g. Testicular Sperm Extraction) increases the risk of preeclampsia, confirming the protective effect of sperm exposure on maternal complications. OBJECTIVE Determining whether the lack of exposure to sperm antigens is associated with worse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies obtained through intracytoplasmic sperm injection after testicular sperm extraction for obstructive azoospermia. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a single-center case-control retrospective study, focusing on all first pregnancies obtained through intracytoplasmic sperm injection after testicular sperm extraction for obstructive azoospermia at Humanitas Fertility Center between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2019. Controls included patients that achieved their first pregnancy with intracytoplasmic sperm injection and ejaculated sperm, for a diagnosis other than azoospermia, in the same time period. Cases were matched with controls in a 1:2 ratio, considering female age, female BMI and year of controlled ovarian stimulation. The primary outcome measure was the delivery rate, defined as the number of deliveries divided by the total number of clinical pregnancies. Secondary outcome measures focused on maternal and neonatal complications, such as miscarriage rate, rate of main obstetric complications, prematurity rate and rate of congenital malformations. RESULTS By analyzing overall 113 pregnancies among cases and 214 pregnancies among controls, this study showed that the delivery rate was higher in controls with respect to cases (92.06% vs 84.07%, p = 0.026); among deliveries, live births were respectively 98.95% and 100%, while only one stillbirth occurred in cases. The first trimester miscarriage rate was higher in the cases than controls (13.27% vs 6.07%, p = 0.027), while no difference was found among rate of second trimester miscarriages, therapeutic abortions and ectopic pregnancies. There was no difference regarding the rate of maternal complications, including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, gestational diabetes, placenta previa, placental abruption and premature rupture of the membranes. Considering neonatal complications, it was shown that twins belonging to controls had a higher prematurity rate with respect to cases (65.79% vs 50.00%) but without a statistical relevance. Lastly, the rate of congenital malformations did not differ among the two groups. DISCUSSION This study showed that, once couples diagnosed with obstructive azoospermia achieve a pregnancy, they have a much higher risk of miscarriage in the first trimester in respect to non-azoospermic patients. Moreover, controls had a higher delivery rate in respect to cases; however, when the fetal status at birth was compared, no difference was found between live births and stillbirths. CONCLUSIONS Differently from the findings in the literature, no association with preeclampsia was found. This might be related to a collider bias/left truncation bias: since azoospermic patients are at higher risk of early termination of pregnancy, it results that they do not have the possibility to develop preeclampsia and other adverse outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Cirillo
- Department of Gynecology- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine- Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS-, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
| | - Paola Costa
- Department of Gynecology- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine- Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS-, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
| | - Massimo Romano
- Department of Gynecology- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine- Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS-, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
| | - Luciano Negri
- Department of Gynecology- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine- Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS-, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
| | - Emanuela Morenghi
- Biostatistics Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS-, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
| | - Elena Albani
- Department of Gynecology- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine- Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS-, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
| | - Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti
- Department of Gynecology- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine- Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS-, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jirge PR, Patil MM, Gutgutia R, Shah J, Govindarajan M, Roy VS, Kaul-Mahajan N, Sharara FI. Ovarian Stimulation in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles for Varied Patient Profiles: An Indian Perspective. J Hum Reprod Sci 2022; 15:112-125. [PMID: 35928474 PMCID: PMC9345274 DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_59_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Controlled ovarian stimulation has been an integral part of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment cycles. Availability of different gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues for prevention of premature rise of leutinising hormone during follicular phase offer an opportunity to utilise them for a successful outcome in women with different subsets of ovarian response. Further, use of GnRH agonist as an alternative for human chorionic gonadotropin improves safety of ovarian stimulation in hyper-responders. Mild ovarian stimulation protocols have emerged as an alternative to conventional protocols in the recent years. Individualisation plays an important role in improving safety of IVF in hyper-responders while efforts continue to improve efficacy in poor responders. Some of the follicular and peri-ovulatory phase interventions may be associated with negative impact on the luteal phase and segmentalisation of the treatment with frozen embryo transfer may be an effective strategy in such a clinical scenario. This narrative review looks at the available evidence on various aspects of ovarian stimulation strategies and their consequences. In addition, it provides a concise summary of the evidence that has emerged from India on various aspects of ovarian stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Padma Rekha Jirge
- Shreyas Hospital and Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic, Kohlhapur, India
| | | | | | - Jatin Shah
- Mumbai Fertility Clinic & IVF Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | | | - Faddy I Sharara
- Virginia Center for Reproductive Medicine, Reston; Department of O&G, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chen D, Shen X, Wang L, Kuang Y. Cumulative live birth rates for low-prognosis women over 5 years or 9 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:233. [PMID: 35317752 PMCID: PMC8939133 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04511-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For heterogeneous populations of low-prognosis women, it remains unclear as to how long individuals should continue undergoing ART when attempting to have a baby, as there have been insufficient studies to date tracking the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) for these women over the entire course of their ART treatment, particularly over extended time periods. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 17,698 women at a tertiary care academic medical center who had begun undergoing IVI/ICSI cycles using a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) approach between January 2013 and January 2019. Low-prognosis patients were stratified into four groups based upon POSEIDON criteria, with patients exhibiting normal or high ovarian reserves and response to stimulation (defined as AFC ≥5, > 9 oocytes retrieved) being included as controls (group 5). The CLBR within 5 years or 9 FET cycles from the ovum pick-up (OPU) day of the first cycle was the primary endpoint for this study, including all repetitive oocyte retrieval cycles and subsequent FET cycles. Optimistic and conservative approaches were used for the analysis of CLBRs and the depiction of cumulative incidence curves. Results Under both optimistic and conservative model analyses, normal and good responders exhibited the highest CLBR within 5 years or 9 FET cycles, followed by younger unexpected poor responders, younger expected poor responders, older unexpected poor responders, and older expected poor responders. Upward trends in CLBRs were evident across the five groups with the prolongation of time or an increase in FET cycle counts. Within the first 2 years or 3 FET cycles, the CLBRs rose rapidly, followed by more moderate increases over the following 2–3.5 years or 4–6 cycles, with expected poor responders exhibiting the most obvious improvements. All Patients reached a CLBR plateau after 3.5 years or 6 FET cycles. Conclusions All low-prognosis women should undergo ART treatment for a minimum of 2 years or 3 FET cycles, and exhibit better outcomes when extending ART treatment to 3.5 years or 6 FET cycles (particularly for POSEIDON groups 3 and 4), but should consider ceasing further treatment thereafter due to a lack of apparent benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Chen
- Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Xi Shen
- Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | | | - Yanping Kuang
- Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai, 200011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen MJ, Yi YC, Guu HF, Chen YF, Kung HF, Chang JC, Chuan ST, Chen LY. A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:931756. [PMID: 36046790 PMCID: PMC9420867 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.931756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of luteinizing hormone (LH) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) requires more evidence for its efficacy. Several studies compared recombinant human LH (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in combination with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) but lack the results with GnRH-antagonist protocol and in Asians. METHODS This is a retrospective, single-center study inspecting women receiving GnRH antagonist protocol and r-hFSH+hMG or r-hFSH+r-hLH regimen for over five days for COH in the in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle in Taiwan from 2013 to 2018. The outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed after propensity score matching between the two groups. A subgroup analysis was conducted in cycles in which women underwent their first embryo transfer (ET), including fresh ET and frozen ET (FET). RESULTS With a total of 503 cycles, the results revealed that the r-hFSH+r-hLH group performed better in terms of numbers of oocytes retrieved (r-hFSH+hMG vs. r-hFSH+r-hLH, 11.7 vs. 13.7, p=0.014), mature oocytes (8.7 vs. 10.9, p=0.001), and fertilized oocytes (8.3 vs. 9.8, p=0.022), while other outcomes were comparable. The analysis of first ET cycles also showed similar trends. Although the implantation rate (39% vs. 43%, p=0.37), pregnancy rate (52% vs. 53%, p=0.90), and live birth rate (39% vs. 45%, p=0.19) were not significantly different, the miscarriage rate was higher in the r-hFSH+hMG group than the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (26% vs. 15%, p<0.05) in first ET cycles. The cumulative pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (53% vs. 64%, p=0.02). No significant difference in rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was observed. CONCLUSION The results support the hypothesis that the treatment of r-hLH+r-hFSH improves COH clinical outcomes in the IVF/ICSI cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Jer Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Ming-Jer Chen,
| | - Yu-Chiao Yi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hwa-Fen Guu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Fang Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Fan Kung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Chun Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Ting Chuan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Li-Yu Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in assisted reproductive technology: a review of literature. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL 2021. [DOI: 10.1186/s43043-021-00083-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Luteinizing hormone (LH) has the main role in ovarian function in both natural and artificial cycles. A normal LH concentration during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is positively correlated to the number and quality of retrieved oocytes and resulting embryos.
Main body of the abstract
In this study, we reviewed whether rLH administration, adjunct to the ovarian stimulation regimen, could improve clinical outcomes. The literature review showed that rLH supplementation improves assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and hyporesponsive women to follicle-stimulating hormone monotherapy. Besides, rLH supplementation has advantages for poor responder women 36–39 years of age. Even though the data suggested no priority regarding the LH source for improving ART outcome, women with different LH polymorphisms who did not respond similarly to ovarian stimulation may benefit from adjuvant rLH therapy.
Conclusion
rLH usage for improving ART outcome should be scrutinized via well-designed studies considering the subgroups of infertile women who benefit the most from rLH adjuvant therapy, the type of ovarian stimulation protocol to which rLH would be added, and also the exact dosage, as well as the proper timing (during or prior to a cycle).
Collapse
|
15
|
Vargas-Tominaga L, Vargas A, Alarcón F, Medina A, Gómez M, Bejar K. Cumulative live birth rates of patients in the Peruvian Andes according to the POSEIDON criteria: a single-center retrospective analysis. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25:412-416. [PMID: 33739802 PMCID: PMC8312301 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To identify low prognosis in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients treated at Centro de Fertilidad y Ginecología del Sur (CFGS) based on the POSEIDON criteria. Methods: This retrospective study included 412 IVF patients and assessed them based on the POSEIDON criteria to describe the cumulative live birth rates seen in each group. Results: 13.1% of patients met the POSEIDON criteria, and the proportion of cases in POSEIDON groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 20.4%, 31.5%, 14.8%, and 33.3%, respectively. The cumulative live birth rate for the individuals meeting the POSEIDON criteria was 25.9%, while for patients in POSEIDON groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 the rates were 45.5%, 29.4%, 25.0%, and 11%, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant due to the small number of cases. Conclusions: Patients belonging to the four POSEIDON groups were described at CFGS. Age and number of retrieved mature oocytes were determining parameters in the prognosis of pregnancy in IVF/ICSI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Vargas-Tominaga
- Centro de Fertilidad y Ginecología del Sur Cusco Peru Centro de Fertilidad y Ginecología del Sur, Cusco, Peru
| | - Andrea Vargas
- Centro de Fertilidad y Ginecología del Sur, Cusco, Peru
| | | | - Andrea Medina
- Centro de Fertilidad y Ginecología del Sur, Cusco, Peru
| | - Maritza Gómez
- Centro de Fertilidad y Ginecología del Sur, Cusco, Peru
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Busnelli A, Somigliana E, Cirillo F, Levi-Setti PE. Is diminished ovarian reserve a risk factor for miscarriage? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2021; 27:973-988. [PMID: 34254138 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) serum concentration and antral follicle count (AFC), as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography, accurately reflect the antral follicle pool. However, AMH and AFC association with fertility surrogates (i.e. age at menopause, probability of conceiving naturally and ART success rate) is questioned. Miscarriage is often considered an alternative measure of reproductive capacity. Nonetheless, the impact of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) on miscarriage incidence remains an understudied and unresolved issue. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate associations between DOR and miscarriage risk, both in women who conceived naturally and in those who achieved pregnancy through ART. SEARCH METHODS Relevant studies were identified by a systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, from database inception to 1 March 2021. Studies were included only if all the following conditions were met: DOR was defined using serum AMH concentration or AFC; miscarriage rate was reported separately for different groups of women categorized according to the AMH and/or AFC level; authors reported either the rate of intrauterine pregnancy loss before 22 weeks of gestation or enough data were available to calculate it. OUTCOMES From a total of 347 publications initially identified, 16 studies were included. Pooled results from 13 retrospective studies focusing on ART pregnancies showed a significantly higher rate of miscarriage in women with a low AMH, as compared to women with a medium or high serum AMH concentration (12 042 women, random effects model, odds ratio (OR) 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.66; P = 0.004; I2=50%). The only prospective study on ART pregnancies failed to show any association (61 women, risk ratio (RR) 2.95; 95% CI, 0.66-3.18; P = 0.16). Data from two prospective studies, which included naturally conceived pregnancies, showed a significantly increased miscarriage risk for women with low serum AMH. However, these data could not undergo meta-analysis owing to differing study designs. Using three retrospective studies, we observed an association between low AFC and miscarriage incidence (three retrospective studies on ART pregnancies, random effects model, OR 1.81; 95% CI, 1.02-3.21; P = 0.04; I2=64%). WIDER IMPLICATIONS Our meta-analysis findings suggest that within the DOR patient subgroup, serum AMH and AFC biomarker levels may correlate with both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of ovarian reserve. However, owing to study limitations, the aetiology of this effect remains unclear and we are unable to define a causal relationship between DOR and increased miscarriage or to provide clinical recommendations based on this information. However, if confirmed by future well-designed studies, these findings would be profoundly informative for guiding women in family planning decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Busnelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Edgardo Somigliana
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Cirillo
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Esteves SC, Conforti A, Sunkara SK, Carbone L, Picarelli S, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Zullo F, Andersen CY, Orvieto R, Humaidan P, Alviggi C. Improving Reporting of Clinical Studies Using the POSEIDON Criteria: POSORT Guidelines. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:587051. [PMID: 33815269 PMCID: PMC8017440 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.587051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) criteria were developed to help clinicians identify and classify low-prognosis patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) and provide guidance for possible therapeutic strategies to overcome infertility. Since its introduction, the number of published studies using the POSEIDON criteria has increased steadily. However, a critical analysis of existing evidence indicates inconsistent and incomplete reporting of critical outcomes. Therefore, we developed guidelines to help researchers improve the quality of reporting in studies applying the POSEIDON criteria. We also discuss the advantages of using the POSEIDON criteria in ART clinical studies and elaborate on possible study designs and critical endpoints. Our ultimate goal is to advance the knowledge concerning the clinical use of the POSEIDON criteria to patients, clinicians, and the infertility community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro C. Esteves
- ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil
- Department of Surgery (Division of Urology), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
- Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sesh K. Sunkara
- Department of Women’s Health, Faculty of Life Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luigi Carbone
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Picarelli
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Laura Rienzi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, GENERA, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fulvio Zullo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Raoul Orvieto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Peter Humaidan
- Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Fertility Clinic Skive, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive, Denmark
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Papageorgiou K, Mastora E, Zikopoulos A, Grigoriou ME, Georgiou I, Michaelidis TM. Interplay Between mTOR and Hippo Signaling in the Ovary: Clinical Choice Guidance Between Different Gonadotropin Preparations for Better IVF. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:702446. [PMID: 34367070 PMCID: PMC8334720 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.702446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the most widely used types of assisted reproduction technology is the in vitro fertilization (IVF), in which women undergo controlled ovarian stimulation through the administration of the appropriate hormones to produce as many mature follicles, as possible. The most common hormone combination is the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues with recombinant or urinary-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). In the last few years, scientists have begun to explore the effect that different gonadotropin preparations have on granulosa cells' maturation and apoptosis, aiming to identify new predictive markers of oocyte quality and successful fertilization. Two major pathways that control the ovarian development, as well as the oocyte-granulosa cell communication and the follicular growth, are the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and the Hippo signaling. The purpose of this article is to briefly review the current knowledge about the effects that the different gonadotropins, used for ovulation induction, may exert in the biology of granulosa cells, focusing on the importance of these two pathways, which are crucial for follicular maturation. We believe that a better understanding of the influence that the various ovarian stimulation protocols have on these critical molecular cascades will be invaluable in choosing the best approach for a given patient, thereby avoiding cancelled cycles, reducing frustration and potential treatment-related complications, and increasing the pregnancy rate. Moreover, individualizing the treatment plan will help clinicians to better coordinate assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs, discuss the specific options with the couples undergoing IVF, and alleviate stress, thus making the IVF experience easier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyriaki Papageorgiou
- Department of Biological Applications & Technologies, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Division of Biomedical Research, Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Eirini Mastora
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics of Human Reproduction, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Medical Genetics and Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Athanasios Zikopoulos
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics of Human Reproduction, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Medical Genetics and Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Maria E. Grigoriou
- Department of Molecular Biology & Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Ioannis Georgiou
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics of Human Reproduction, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Medical Genetics and Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Theologos M. Michaelidis
- Department of Biological Applications & Technologies, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Division of Biomedical Research, Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas, Ioannina, Greece
- *Correspondence: Theologos M. Michaelidis, ;
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Esteves SC, Yarali H, Vuong LN, Carvalho JF, Özbek İY, Polat M, Le HL, Pham TD, Ho TM. Low Prognosis by the POSEIDON Criteria in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Multicenter and Multinational Prevalence Study of Over 13,000 Patients. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:630550. [PMID: 33790862 PMCID: PMC8006427 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.630550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence of low-prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria using real-world data. DESIGN Multicenter population-based cohort study. SETTINGS Fertility clinics in Brazil, Turkey, and Vietnam. PATIENTS Infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technology using standard ovarian stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins. INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Per-period prevalence rates of POSEIDON patients (overall, stratified by POSEIDON groups and by study center) and the effect of covariates on the probability that a patient be classified as "POSEIDON". RESULTS A total of 13,146 patients were included. POSEIDON patients represented 43.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.0-43.7) of the studied population, and the prevalence rates varied across study centers (range: 38.6-55.7%). The overall prevalence rates by POSEIDON groups were 44.2% (group 1; 95% CI 42.6-45.9), 36.1% (group 2; 95% CI 34.6-37.7), 5.2% (group 3; 95% CI 4.5-6.0), and 14.4% (group 4; 95% CI: 13.3-15.6). In general, POSEIDON patients were older, had a higher body mass index (BMI), lower ovarian reserve markers, and a higher frequency of female factor as the primary treatment indication than non-POSEIDON patients. The former required larger doses of gonadotropin for ovarian stimulation, despite achieving a 2.5 times lower number of retrieved oocytes than non-POSEIDON patients. Logistic regression analyses revealed that female age, BMI, ovarian reserve, and a female infertility factor were relevant predictors of the POSEIDON condition. CONCLUSIONS The estimated prevalence of POSEIDON patients in the general population undergoing ART is significant. These patients differ in clinical characteristics compared with non-POSEIDON patients. The POSEIDON condition is associated with female age, ovarian reserve, BMI, and female infertility. Efforts in terms of diagnosis, counseling, and treatment are needed to reduce the prevalence of low-prognosis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro C. Esteves
- ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Sandro C. Esteves, ; orcid.org/0000-0002-1313-9680
| | - Hakan Yarali
- Anatolia IVF, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Lan N. Vuong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- IVFMD, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- HOPE Research Center, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | - Ho L. Le
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- IVFMD, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Toan D. Pham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- IVFMD, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tuong M. Ho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- IVFMD, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ob'edkova KV, Kogan IY, Muller VC, Tapilskaya NI, Krikhely IO, Dzhemlikhanova LK, Abdulkadirova ZK, Mekina ID, Lesik EA, Komarova EA, Ishchuk MA, Gzgzian AM. IVF protocol efficacy in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 37:44-48. [PMID: 34937512 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.2006526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INVESTIGATION OBJECTIVE IVF protocol efficacy estimation in women with expected suboptimal response depending on ovary stimulation mode. MATERIALS AND TECHNIQUE A randomized controlled study embracing results of 51 IVF cycle in women with ovary suboptimal response. The suboptimal response prognostic analysis was performed basing on ≤9 oocyte cumulus complexes obtained in previous IVF programs, the presence of no less than 5-9 antral follicles in both oocytes and amount of anti-Mullerian Hormone ≥0,8 ng/mL. In Group I (n = 25), the stimulation was performed by recombinant corifollitropin alfa combined with highly purified urinary gonadotropin, while in Group II (n = 26) it was made by means of recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa within the protocol of applying gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. RESULTS The total gonadotropin dose in Group II patients was authentically lower compared to Group I (p˂,01). No statistical difference between the two studied groups was detected concerning the number of obtained oocytes, 2pn zygote, good-quality transferred embryos and clinical pregnancy rate (p>.05). Embryo cryopreservation was performed only for group-II patients. CONCLUSION Corifollitropin alfa administration combined with highly purified menotropin in IVF cycles for suboptimal responders is quite effective, however, this strategy has no preference over other stimulation modes. The strategy of using recombinant follitropin/lutropin alfa can be promotive to IVF outcomes for suboptimal responders by means of embryo banking. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03177538.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K V Ob'edkova
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - I Y Kogan
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
- FSBEI of HE St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - V C Muller
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - N I Tapilskaya
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
- FSBEI of HE St. Petersburg State Pediatriс Medical University under The Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - I O Krikhely
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - L Kh Dzhemlikhanova
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
- FSBEI of HE St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Z K Abdulkadirova
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
- FSBEI of HE St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - I D Mekina
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - E A Lesik
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - E A Komarova
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - M A Ishchuk
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - A M Gzgzian
- FSBSI 'The Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O.Ott', St. Petersburg, Russia
- FSBEI of HE St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Arvis P, Massin N, Lehert P. Effect of recombinant LH supplementation on cumulative live birth rate compared with FSH alone in poor ovarian responders: a large, real-world study. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 42:546-554. [PMID: 33431337 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION The benefit of LH supplementation (LHS) over sole use of FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) remains controversial. Meta-analyses have provided some evidence that the benefit of LHS is limited to women with poor ovarian response (POR). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of LHS on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) in POR using a large controlled study in a real-world context. DESIGN This retrospective multicentre controlled study used data from registries at 12 French ART centres. All instances of POR undergoing ovarian stimulation and treated with follitrophin-alfa (FSH-α) with or without lutrophin-α were selected following an intention-to-treat principle. POR was defined according to the ESHRE Bologna criteria, and classified into three categories (Mild, Moderate and Severe) according to the Poor Responder Outcome Prediction (PROsPeR) score. The primary end-point was the CLBR associated with fresh and frozen embryos originating from the same ovarian stimulation. RESULTS A total of 9787 instances of ovarian stimulation (5218 LHS, 4569 FSH-α only) were analysed, 33.0%, 52.4% and 14.6% being allocated to the Mild, Moderate and Severe PROsPeR categories, respectively. Using a mixed logistic model and adjusting for matched subclasses and baseline POR severity, it was found that the benefit of LHS compared with use of FSH alone differed between baseline severity categories (interaction test, P = 0.007): a significant benefit of LHS for CLBR was found for patients in the Moderate (14.3% versus 11.3%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.75, risk ratio [RR] = 1.29, P = 0.013) and Severe (9.8% versus 4.4%, OR = 2.40, 95% CI- 1.48-3.89, RR = 1.89, P < 0.001) categories, but not for the Mild category (18.8% versus 19.6%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.15, RR = 0.95, P = 0.60). CONCLUSION LHS has a significant effect on increasing CLBR in moderately and severely poor ovarian responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Philippe Lehert
- Faculty of Economics, UCL Mons, Louvain, Belgium, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yang R, Zhang C, Chen L, Wang Y, Li R, Liu P, Qiao J. Cumulative live birth rate of low prognosis patients with POSEIDON stratification: a single-centre data analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41:834-844. [PMID: 32978073 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Does patient-oriented strategies encompassing individualized oocyte number (POSEIDON) classification help stratify the reproductive potential of patients with low prognosis more effectively from the perspective of prognosis; and as cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) is an effect indication, how is CLBR in patients stratified using POSEIDON? DESIGN A retrospective cohort study of 10,615 women who underwent IVF treatment at the Peking University Third Hospital between January 2017 and December 2017. Patients were stratified according to POSEIDON criteria. Clinical characteristics, fresh embryo transfer outcomes and CLBR during the first two ovarian stimulation cycles were recorded. RESULTS Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol was the most used treatment in both ovarian stimulation cycles. After the failure of the first IVF treatment, 2063 (29.2%) women continued the second treatment, and 10.9% of them switched to the micro-stimulation protocol. Compared with the non-POSEIDON group, the CLBR of the first cycle in each POSEIDON group was lower (P < 0.001). The CLBRs of the second cycle in older patients (POSEIDON groups 2b and 4) and in younger patients with poor ovarian reserve (POSEIDON group 3) were lower than that in non-POSEIDON group (group 2b, P = 0.001; group 3, P = 0.019; group 4, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that younger patients had higher CLBR than older patients in both cycles (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The CLBRs vary among different POSEIDON groups. The results may help reproductive specialists to understand the characteristics of low prognosis patients better and to develop individualized treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Chunmei Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Lixue Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yuanyuan Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Rong Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China.
| | - Ping Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Jie Qiao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing 100191, China; Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100191, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing 100191, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cumulative live-birth, perinatal and obstetric outcomes for POSEIDON groups after IVF/ICSI cycles: a single-center retrospective study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:11822. [PMID: 32678263 PMCID: PMC7366673 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68896-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, perinatal outcomes and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) have widely been utilized to assess the fertility outcomes and safety of assisted reproductive technology (ART), but more robust research is needed to address the success rates of live-healthy births resulting from this procedure, particularly for patients with low prognosis. This study aims to assess and comparative perinatal outcomes and CLBR per cycle of in vitro fertilization/Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) between four groups of low prognosis characterized by POSEIDON criteria. A retrospective assessment was done among infertile women with a low prognosis undergoing IVF/ICSI at a reproductive center in China. Data were collected between January 2011 and December 2015 with a follow-up of at least two years, and censoring was defined by three-cycle completion, discontinuation, or having a live birth. Participants were grouped into 4 groups according to the POSEIDON classification (POSEIDON1, POSEIDON2, POSEIDON3, and POSEIDON4). The main outcomes were perinatal and obstetric outcomes with CLBR per cycle after IVF/ICSI procedure. And IVF/ICSI-technique outcomes as a secondary outcome. Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS, and a p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 461 eligible participants underwent a total of 825 IVF/ICSI cycles. POSEIDON1 had the best perinatal outcomes in terms of live births (≥ 28w) (54.8%). POSEIDON4 had a higher risk for perinatal and obstetric complications with abortion rate (9.8%); LBW (11.7%), PTD (23.5%), PROM (11.7%), and gestational diabetes (17.6%). POSEIDON2 had a high rate for malpresentation (14.2%), and cesarean delivery(57.2%), while POSEIDON3 was much associated with the occurrences of placenta previa (9.3%) compared to other groups (p value = 0.001). After adjusting odds ratio by age and BMI, POSEIDON4 had the least odds for biochemical pregnancy (p value = 0.019); and the least odds for clinical pregnancy (p value = 0.001) of the four groups. CLBR per cycle was better in POSEIDON1 and increased with an increasing number of cycles in all groups during the three cycles. Conservative CLBR after three complete cycles were 77.27%, 42.52%, 51.4% and 22.34%, while optimistic CLBR were 79.01%, 51.19%, 58.59% and 34.46% in POSEIDON1 to POSEIDON4, respectively. Younger women with low prognosis and normal ovarian reserve have a higher probability for live births and better perinatal outcomes compared with older women with poor or normal ovarian reserve. Besides, young women with low prognosis, despite ovarian reserve status, can increase their probability of conception and get relatively higher CLBR by undergoing multiple cycles of IVF/ICSI. Age is therefore considered as a critical parameter in predicting the perinatal outcome and CLBR.
Collapse
|
24
|
Blumenfeld Z. What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:192. [PMID: 32362870 PMCID: PMC7180183 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The infertile patients with aging ovaries-also sometimes referred to as impending premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), impending premature ovarian failure (POF), or poor ovarian responders (POR), constitute a significant and increasing bulk of the patients appealing to IVF/ART. Different causes have been cited in the literature, among the identified etiologies, including chromosomal and genetic etiology, metabolic, enzymatic, iatrogenic, toxic, autoimmune, and infectious causes. Although the most successful and ultimate treatment of POI/POF/POR patients is egg donation (ED), many, if not most, of these infertile women are reluctant to consent to ED upon the initial diagnostic interview, requesting alternative solutions despite the low odds for success. Despite anecdotal case reports, no unequivocal treatment proved to be successful for these patients in prospective randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, the addition of growth hormone (GH) to ovarian stimulation in POR with GH deficiency may improve the results of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and the IVF success. In patients with autoimmune etiology for POR/POI, the combination of glucocorticosteroids, pituitary-ovarian suppression, and COH may be successful in achieving the desired conception.
Collapse
|
25
|
Levi Setti PE, Cirillo F, De Cesare R, Morenghi E, Canevisio V, Ronchetti C, Baggiani A, Smeraldi A, Albani E, Patrizio P. Seven Years of Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers: Comparison of 3 Preparation Protocols at a Single ART Center. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:346. [PMID: 32547496 PMCID: PMC7272701 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) have become a standard practice to increase cumulative pregnancy rates, however, the choice of the best preparation protocol remains a matter of debate. Design: Retrospective analysis of clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) of FET in natural cycles (NC-FET), modified natural cycles with hCG-triggered ovulation (mNC-FET), and hormonal artificial replacement (AR-FET). Materials and Methods: For natural cycles, patients were monitored by ultrasound to evaluate the dominant follicle and by urinary LH kits (NC-FET). When the endometrial thickness reached at least 7 mm and the dominant follicle 16-20 mm, hCG was administered in absence of urinary LH surge (mNC-FET). Embryo thawing and transfer was planned 7 days after LH surge or hCG administration. For the AR-FET, oral estradiol valerate was administered from day 2 of menstrual cycle until endometrial thickness reached at least 7 mm and transfer was planned after 5 days of vaginal progesterone start. Only single vitrified blastocyst transfers were included. Results: In total 2,895 transfers were performed of which 561 (19.4%) carried out with NC-FET, 1,749 (60.4%) with mNC-FET and 585 (20.2%) with AR-FET. CPRs were 32.62, 43.05, and 37.26%, respectively. LBR were 24.06, 33.56, and 25.81%, respectively. A statistically significant (p < 0.001) higher LBR for mNC-FET vs. NC-FET (OR 0.49-0.78) and AR-FET (OR 0.47-0.74) was observed. A higher ectopic pregnancy rate (p = 0.002) was observed in NC-FET (3.28%) than in AR-FET (1.83%) and mNC-FET (0.40%). A higher abortion rate (p = 0.031) in pregnancies <12 weeks was observed in AR-FET (27.52%) than in NC-FET (19.67%) and in mNC-FET (19.39%). At Post hoc analysis only female age (OR 0.91-0.95), antimullerian hormone (AMH) (OR 1.01-1.07) and mNC-FET (OR 1.39-1.98) were statically significant prognostic factors for LBRs. Conclusions: These results demonstrate a superior CPR and LBR following FET in hCG-triggered ovulation cycles compared to NC and AR-FET, a higher ectopic pregnancy rate in NC-FET and a higher abortion rate in pregnancies <12 weeks in AR-FET. However, these data need to be confirmed in randomized and prospective studies before definitive conclusions can be drawn. Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03581422.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti
| | - Federico Cirillo
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella De Cesare
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Morenghi
- Biostatistics Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Canevisio
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Ronchetti
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Annamaria Baggiani
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Smeraldi
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Albani
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Pasquale Patrizio
- Yale University Fertility Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale University Fertility Center, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
De Cesare R, Morenghi E, Cirillo F, Ronchetti C, Canevisio V, Persico P, Baggiani A, Sandri MT, Levi-Setti PE. The Role of hCG Triggering Progesterone Levels: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study of More Than 8000 IVF/ICSI Cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:547684. [PMID: 33071968 PMCID: PMC7538643 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.547684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between serum ovulation trigger progesterone (P) levels and the outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles. Design Setting: Real world single-center retrospective cohort study. Patient Intervention(s): All fresh cleavage and blastocyst-stage embryo transfers (ETs) performed from January 2012 to December 2016. Main outcome Measure(s): The impact of premature high serum P levels cycles in terms of clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs) and live birth rates (LBRs). Results: 8,034 ETs were performed: 7,597 cleavage-stage transfers and 437 blastocyst transfers. Serum P levels demonstrated to be inversely related to CPR (OR 0.72, p < 0.001) and LBR (OR 0.73, p < 0.001). The progressive decrease of LBR and CPR started when P levels were >1 ng/ml in a good prognosis cleavage ET subgroup, whereas in patients with worse prognosis only for P ≥ 1.75 ng/ml. In the blastocyst ET subgroup, the negative effect of P elevation was reported only if P was >1.75 ng/ml. CPR (OR 0.71 (0.62-0.80), p < 0.001) and LBR (OR 0.73 (0.63-0.84), p < 0.001) in thawed cycles resulted statistically significantly higher than in fresh cycles in the cleavage-stage subgroup. In the blastocyst group, no significant difference resulted between thawed and fresh cycles, independently of P levels [CPR OR 0. 37 (0.49-1.09), p = 0.123; LBR OR 0.71 (0.46-1.10), p = 0.126]. Conclusion: High P levels decrease CPR as well as LBR in both cleavage and blastocyst ET. In the cleavage group, for P levels below 1.75 ng/ml, our data suggest the possibility to wait until day 5 for ET, and if P level is ≥1.75 ng/ml, it should be considered to freeze all embryos and postpone the ET. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04253470.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella De Cesare
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Morenghi
- Biostatistics Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Cirillo
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Ronchetti
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Canevisio
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Persico
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Annamaria Baggiani
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Sandri
- Clinical Analysis Laboratory, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
- Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Fertility Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center—IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Improves Clinical, Gestational, and Neonatal Outcomes in Advanced Maternal Age Patients Without Compromising Cumulative Live-Birth Rate. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:2493-2504. [PMID: 31713776 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01609-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the effects of blastocyst stage aneuploidy testing on clinical, gestational, and neonatal outcomes for patients of advanced maternal age undergoing IVF. METHODS This is a single-center observational-cohort study with 2 years follow-up. The study includes a total of 2538 couples undergoing 2905 egg collections (control group), 308 (PGT-A), and 106 (drop-out group, consenting for PGT-A but withdrawing due to poor embryological outcome) RESULTS: Compared with control group, PGT-A showed improved clinical outcomes (live-birth rate per transferred embryo, LBR 40.3% vs 11.0%) and reduced multiple pregnancy rate (MPR, 0% vs 11.1%) and pregnancy loss (PL, 3.6% vs 22.6%). Drop-out group showed the worst clinical outcomes suggesting that abandoning PGT-A due to poor response to ovarian stimulation is not a favorable option. Cytogenetic analysis of product of conceptions and CVS/amniocentesis showed higher aneuploid pregnancy rates for control group regardless of embryo transfer strategy (0%, 17.9%, and 19.9%, for PGT-A, control day 5 and day 3, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed no negative impact of PGT-A-related interventions on cumulative delivery rate (26.3%, 95% CI 21.5-31.6 vs 24.0%, 95% CI 22.5-25.6 for PGT-A and control, respectively) and on neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION PGT-A improves clinical outcomes, particularly by reducing pregnancy loss and chromosomally abnormal pregnancy for patients of advanced maternal age, with no major impact on cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) per egg retrieval.
Collapse
|
28
|
Orvieto R. HMG versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH in ovarian stimulation for IVF: does the source of LH preparation matter? Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:1001-1006. [PMID: 31672439 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Studies on the role of LH supplementation in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technique use different sources of LH bioactivity-containing preparations, daily doses and modes of administration. This review aims to critically present the available evidence comparing the effect of the two commercially available LH preparations (human menopausal gonadotrophin [HMG] and recombinant FSH + recombinant LH) with different sources of intrinsic LH bioactivity (HCG versus LH, respectively) on ovarian stimulation characteristics and IVF cycle outcomes. A literature review was conducted for all relevant articles reporting on IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome after ovarian stimulation using HMG or recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH. The available studies are mostly observational, using different daily doses and modes of administration. No statistically significant differences were observed in ovarian stimulation variables and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates when HMG was compared with recombinant FSH + recombinant LH. Moreover, combined analysis of all the available prospective and retrospective studies produced no firm conclusions in favour of either source of LH bioactivity. Further large randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate the effect of the LH source on IVF outcome and to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from the addition of LH bioactivity supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raoul Orvieto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; The Tarnesby-Tarnowski Chair for Family Planning and Fertility Regulation, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Esteves SC, Alviggi C, Humaidan P, Fischer R, Andersen CY, Conforti A, Bühler K, Sunkara SK, Polyzos NP, Galliano D, Grynberg M, Yarali H, Özbek IY, Roque M, Vuong LN, Banker M, Rienzi L, Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi FM. The POSEIDON Criteria and Its Measure of Success Through the Eyes of Clinicians and Embryologists. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019; 10:814. [PMID: 31824427 PMCID: PMC6880663 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This article represents a viewpoint on the POSEIDON criteria by a group of clinicians and embryologists. Its primary objective is to contextualize the Poseidon criteria and their metric of success for the relevant Frontiers Research Topic "POSEIDON's Stratification of Low Prognosis Patients in ART: The WHY, the WHAT, and the HOW". "Low prognosis" relates with reduced oocyte number, which can be associated with low or sometimes a normal ovarian reserve and is aggravated by advanced female age. These aspects will ultimately affect the number of embryos generated and consequently, the cumulative live birth rate. The novel system relies on female age, ovarian reserve markers, ovarian sensitivity to exogenous gonadotropin, and the number of oocytes retrieved, which will both identify the patients with low prognosis and stratify such patients into one of four groups of women with "expected" or "unexpected" impaired ovarian response to exogenous gonadotropin stimulation. Furthermore, the POSEIDON group introduced a new measure of clinical success in ART, namely, the ability to retrieve the number of oocytes needed to obtain at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer in each patient. Using the POSEIDON criteria, the clinician can firstly identify and classify patients who have low prognosis in ART, and secondly, aim at designing an individualized treatment plan to maximize the chances of achieving the POSEIDON measure of success in each of the four low prognosis groups. The novel POSEIDON classification system is anticipated to improve counseling and management of low prognosis patients undergoing ART, with an expected positive effect on reproductive success and a reduction in the time to live birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro C. Esteves
- ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Sandro C. Esteves
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Peter Humaidan
- Fertility Clinic Skive, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive, Denmark
- Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Claus Y. Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Klaus Bühler
- Center for Gynecology, Endocrinology, and Reproductive Medicine, Ulm, Germany
- Department of Gynaecology, Jena-University Hospital-Friedrich, Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Sesh K. Sunkara
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Michael Grynberg
- Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
| | | | | | - Matheus Roque
- ORIGEN, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Lan N. Vuong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- IVFMD, My Duc Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | | - Laura Rienzi
- GENERA, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|