Effect of GnRH agonist trigger with or without low-dose hCG on reproductive outcomes for PCOS women with freeze-all strategy: a propensity score matching study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger alone versus dual trigger comprising GnRHa and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on reproductive outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who received the freeze-all strategy.

METHODS

A total of 615 cycles were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control potential confounding factors between GnRHa-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa) and dual-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa plus 1000/2000 IU hCG) in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to estimate the association between trigger methods and reproductive outcomes.

RESULTS

After PSM, patients with dual trigger (n = 176) had more oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and 2PN embryos compared to that with GnRHa trigger alone. However, the oocytes maturation rate, normal fertilization rate, and frozen embryos between the two groups were not statistically different. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (14.8% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001) and moderate/severe OHSS (11.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in dual-trigger group than in GnRHa-alone group. Logistic regression analysis showed the adjusted odds ratio of dual trigger was 5.971 (95% confidence interval 2.201-16.198, P < 0.001) for OHSS. The pregnancy and single neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For PCOS women with freeze-all strategy, GnRHa trigger alone decreased the risk of OHSS without damaging oocyte maturation and achieved satisfactory pregnancy outcomes.

Cumulative live birth rates for low-prognosis women over 5 years or 9 frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Background

For heterogeneous populations of low-prognosis women, it remains unclear as to how long individuals should continue undergoing ART when attempting to have a baby, as there have been insufficient studies to date tracking the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) for these women over the entire course of their ART treatment, particularly over extended time periods.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 17,698 women at a tertiary care academic medical center who had begun undergoing IVI/ICSI cycles using a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) approach between January 2013 and January 2019. Low-prognosis patients were stratified into four groups based upon POSEIDON criteria, with patients exhibiting normal or high ovarian reserves and response to stimulation (defined as AFC ≥5, > 9 oocytes retrieved) being included as controls (group 5). The CLBR within 5 years or 9 FET cycles from the ovum pick-up (OPU) day of the first cycle was the primary endpoint for this study, including all repetitive oocyte retrieval cycles and subsequent FET cycles. Optimistic and conservative approaches were used for the analysis of CLBRs and the depiction of cumulative incidence curves.

Results

Under both optimistic and conservative model analyses, normal and good responders exhibited the highest CLBR within 5 years or 9 FET cycles, followed by younger unexpected poor responders, younger expected poor responders, older unexpected poor responders, and older expected poor responders. Upward trends in CLBRs were evident across the five groups with the prolongation of time or an increase in FET cycle counts. Within the first 2 years or 3 FET cycles, the CLBRs rose rapidly, followed by more moderate increases over the following 2–3.5 years or 4–6 cycles, with expected poor responders exhibiting the most obvious improvements. All Patients reached a CLBR plateau after 3.5 years or 6 FET cycles.

Conclusions

All low-prognosis women should undergo ART treatment for a minimum of 2 years or 3 FET cycles, and exhibit better outcomes when extending ART treatment to 3.5 years or 6 FET cycles (particularly for POSEIDON groups 3 and 4), but should consider ceasing further treatment thereafter due to a lack of apparent benefit.

Cumulative live birth rates over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation cycles: 10-year cohort study of 20,687 women following freeze-all strategy from one single centre

PURPOSE

To explore the cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) among patients following freeze-all strategy METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among 20,687 women undergoing their first and following IVF cycles from 2007 to 2016. The main outcomes of present study were live birth rate per cycle, conservative CLBR and optimal CLBR.

RESULTS

The CLBR increased from 50.74% for the first complete cycle to 64.41% for the conservative estimate and 84.77% for the optimal estimate after seven complete cycles. The CLBRs varied by age. The conservative estimate of CLBR after five complete cycles declined from 77.11% for women younger than 31 years, to 8.63% for women older than 40 years. The optimal CLBRs were 91.82% and 13.74%, respectively. The predictors of live birth over multiple complete cycles for patients embarking on IVF following freeze-all strategy were women's age and causes of infertility. For patients finishing the first complete cycle, the number of oocytes retrieved at complete cycle one also played an important predictive role.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women undergoing IVF following freeze-all strategy, the CLBR after seven complete IVF cycles was 84.77% if there were not barriers to continue the IVF treatment, with variation by age. Two prediction models were developed to estimate their probability of having a baby over multiple complete IVF cycles with freeze-all strategy among patients before starting IVF and patients after the first complete cycle, which is critical for patients to make treatment decisions and preparations physically, emotionally, and financially.

Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from time interval between a freeze-all cycle and a subsequent frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer

Background

Adverse obstetric outcomes are correlated with altered circulating hormone levels at the time implantation by the trophectoderm. What’ more, embryo freezing process may also have adverse effect on perinatal outcomes. This study aims to evaluate whether increasing interval time between a freeze-all cycle and a subsequent frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer could have any effect on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study included the first single blastocyst transfer in artificially cycles of all patients who underwent a freeze-all cycle between January 1^st, 2016 and September 30^th, 2018. All patients were divided into two groups according to the time interval between oocyte retrieval and the day of first frozen-thawed embryo transferred (FET): Group 1 (immediate FET cycles) and Group 2 (delayed FET cycles).

Results

No significant differences were reported between the two groups regarding the rates of clinical pregnancy, live birth, biochemical pregnancy and pregnancy loss even after adjusting for measured confounding. When accounting for perinatal outcomes, gestational age, birth weight, delivery mode, fetus gender, preterm birth, gestational hypertension, GDM, placenta previa, fetal malformation and low birthweight also did not vary significantly between the two groups. Only the incidence of macrosomia was more frequently in the Group 2 compared with the Group 1 (AOR 3.886, 95%CI 1.153–13.103, P = 0.029) after adjusting with a multiple logistic regression model.

Conclusions

We found delayed FET cycles for blastocyst transfer following freeze-all cycles may not improve the pregnancy outcomes. On the contrary, postponement of FET cycles may increase the risk of macrosomia. Therefore, FET cycles for blastocyst transfer should be done immediately to avoid adverse effects of delayed time on perinatal outcomes.

Delayed frozen embryo transfer failed to improve live birth rate and neonatal outcomes in patients requiring whole embryo freezing

BACKGROUND

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has a negative effect on the endometrial receptivity compared with natural menstrual cycle. Whether it's necessary to postpone the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) following a freeze-all strategy in order to avoid any residual effect on endometrial receptivity consequent to COS was inconclusive.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to explore whether the delayed FET improve the live birth rate and neonatal outcomes stratified by COS protocols after a freeze-all strategy.

METHODS

A total of 4404 patients who underwent the first FET cycle were enrolled in this study between April 2014 to December 2017, and were divided into immediate (within the first menstrual cycle following withdrawal bleeding) or delayed FET (waiting for at least one menstrual cycle and the transferred embryos were cryopreserved for less than 6 months). Furthermore, each group was further divided into two subgroups according to COS protocols, and the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were analyzed between the immediate and delayed FET following the same COS protocol.

RESULTS

When FET cycles following the same COS protocol, there was no significant difference regarding the rates of live birth, implantation, clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, early miscarriage, premature birth and stillbirth between immediate and delayed FET groups. Similarly, no significant differences were found for the mean gestational age, the mean birth weight, and rates of low birth weight and very low birth weight between the immediate and delayed FET groups. The sex ratio (male/female) and the congenital anomalies rate also did not differ significantly between the two FET groups stratified by COS protocols.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of COS protocols, FET could be performed immediately after a freeze-all strategy for delaying FET failed to improve reproductive and neonatal outcomes.

Closed embryo culture system improved embryological and clinical outcome for single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: A single-center large cohort study

While some studies have shown that the closed embryo culture system (CCS) is a possible improvement over standard embryo culture systems (STS) in terms of early embryonic development, information on clinical outcomes of culturing blastocysts following single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) in the CCS and STS remains limited. Therefore, the objective of this single-center, large-cohort, retrospective study was to compare embryonic development until the blastocyst stage and clinical outcomes following SVBT between CCS and STS. From May 2017 to October 2018, 2420 oocytes from 1402 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization and blastocyst culture after minimal stimulation were divided into two groups (CCS and STS). The main outcome measures in the two groups were embryological (blastocyst formation rates and utilized blastocyst rates) and clinical outcomes (ongoing pregnancy rates) after a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT). There were no significant differences in the blastocyst formation rates between the CCS and STS groups (59.6% versus 59.1%, p = 0.81). However, there were significant differences in utilized blastocyst rates (51.0% versus 46.6%, p < 0.05). Ongoing pregnancy rates per SVBT cycle were significantly higher in the CCS group than in the STS group (41.4% versus 34.4%, p < 0.05). Moreover, after applying multivariable logistic regression analysis, the type of embryo culture system (CCS to STS, adjusted odds ratios: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.91) was correlated with ongoing pregnancy. Our study suggests that compared to STS, CCS could improve utilized blastocyst rates and ongoing pregnancy rates to a greater extent, following SVBT.

Live birth rate and neonatal outcome following cleavage-stage embryo transfer versus blastocyst transfer using the freeze-all strategy

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the live birth rates and neonatal outcomes following cleavage-stage embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer in a freeze-all treatment scenario?

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study. All good-quality embryos were frozen on the third day; the remaining embryos were grown on until they reached blastocyst stage and then frozen. Between 2007 and 2016, 11,801 patients underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 1009 patients underwent blastocyst transfer in the first treatment cycle using the freeze-all strategy. The live birth rate and neonatal outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The live birth rate in the first frozen embryo transfer cycle was higher following blastocyst transfer than following cleavage-stage transfer (69.1% versus 55.5%, P < 0.01), but there was no difference in live birth rate in the second frozen embryo transfer cycle between blastocyst transfer and cleavage-stage transfer (45.2% versus 52.7%, P > 0.05). Similarly, no difference was found in the cumulative live birth rate for the first complete IVF cycle (71.1% versus 69.2%, P > 0.05). Blastocyst transfer gave a higher risk of preterm singleton delivery than did cleavage-stage transfer. However, there was no difference in the risk of early preterm delivery, low birth weight, very low birth weight, high birth weight and very high birth weight between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support the superiority of blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage-stage transfer in a freeze-all treatment scenario. There may be a higher risk of preterm singleton delivery following blastocyst transfer than following cleavage-stage transfer but further studies are needed to verify this.