Toward the Existence of a Sympathetic Neuroplasticity Adaptive Mechanism Influencing the Immune Response. A Hypothetical View-Part II

Innate and adaptive immune system consequences of post-traumatic stress disorder

In the field of psychiatry, biological markers are rarely, if ever, used in the diagnosis of mental health disorders. Clinicians rely primarily on patient histories and behavioral symptoms to identify specific psychopathologies, which makes diagnosis highly subjective. Moreover, therapies for mental health disorders are aimed specifically at attenuating behavioral manifestations, which overlooks the pathophysiological indices of the disease. This is highly evident in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) where inflammation and immune system perturbations are becoming increasingly described. Further, patients with PTSD possess significantly elevated risks of developing comorbid inflammatory diseases such as autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases, which are likely linked (though not fully proven) to the apparent dysregulation of the immune system after psychological trauma. To date, there is little to no evidence that demonstrates current PTSD therapies are able to reverse the increased risk for psychological trauma-induced inflammatory diseases, which suggests the behavioral and somatic consequences of PTSD may not be tightly coupled. This observation provides an opportunity to explore unique mechanisms outside of the brain that contribute to the long-term pathology of PTSD. Herein, we provide an overview of neuroimmune mechanisms, describe what is known regarding innate and adaptive immunity in PTSD, and suggest new directions that are needed to advance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of PTSD moving forward.

Peripheral neuroimmune interactions: selected review and some clinical implications

Purpose

To provide a brief and focused review on peripheral neuroimmune interactions and their implications for some clinical disorders.

Methods

Narrative review of the literature including of English-language articles published between 1985 and 2021 using PubMed and MEDLINE.

Results

Many studies on experimental models and in vitro indicate that there are close interactions between the neural and immune systems. Processes from sensory afferents and autonomic efferents co-localize with immune cells and interact at discrete anatomical sites forming neuroimmune units. These neuroimmune interactions are bidirectional and mediated by a wide range of soluble factors including neuropeptides, classical neurotransmitters, cytokines, and other molecules that mediate complex cross-talk among nerves and immune cells. Small-diameter sensory afferents express a wide range of receptors that respond directly to tissue damage or pathogen signals and to chemokines, cytokines, or other molecules released from immune cells. Reciprocally, immune cells respond to neurotransmitters released from nociceptive and autonomic fibers. Neuroimmune interactions operate both at peripheral tissues and at the level of the central nervous system. Both centrally and peripherally, glial cells have a major active role in this bidirectional communication.

Conclusions

Peripheral neuroimmune interactions are complex and importantly contribute to the pathophysiology of several disorders, including skin, respiratory, and intestinal inflammatory disorders typically associated with pain and altered barrier function. These interactions may be relevant for persistence of symptoms in disorders associated with intense immune activation.

Chinese Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Depression: Effects on the Neuroendocrine-Immune Network

The neuroimmune and neuroendocrine systems are two critical biological systems in the pathogenesis of depression. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated that the activation of the neuroinflammatory response of the immune system and hyperactivity of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis of the neuroendocrine system commonly coexist in patients with depression and that these two systems bidirectionally regulate one another through neural, immunological, and humoral intersystem interactions. The neuroendocrine-immune network poses difficulties associated with the development of antidepressant agents directed toward these biological systems for the effective treatment of depression. On the other hand, multidrug and multitarget Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM) has great potential to assist in the development of novel medications for the systematic pharmacotherapy of depression. In this narrative essay, we conclusively analyze the mechanisms of action of CHM antidepressant constituents and formulas, specifically through the modulation of the neuroendocrine-immune network, by reviewing recent preclinical studies conducted using depressive animal models. Some CHM herbal constituents and formulas are highlighted as examples, and their mechanisms of action at both the molecular and systems levels are discussed. Furthermore, we discuss the crosstalk of these two biological systems and the systems pharmacology approach for understanding the system-wide mechanism of action of CHM on the neuroendocrine-immune network in depression treatment. The holistic, multidrug, and multitarget nature of CHM represents an excellent example of systems medicine in the effective treatment of depression.