Editorial: Growth Hormone in Fertility and Infertility: Physiology, Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment

Patient-tailored reproductive health care

Patient-tailored reproductive health care represents an important challenge for the current practice of infertility prevention, diagnosis and treatment. This approach is based on the concept of precision medicine, taking into account genetic, epigenetic, metabolic and lifestyle characteristics of each individual patient. Even though this goal is still far from being wholly achieved, some aspects can already be put into practice nowadays. Personalization can be based on a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of the patients' personal and familial history, taking into account outcomes of previous assisted reproduction technique (ART) attempts, if available, and confronting these data with the past and the latest clinical and laboratory examination outcomes. As to the male fertility status, there is an urgent need for the inclusion of an accurate diagnostic workup of infertile men leading to the choice of the most adequate follow-up for each particular pathological condition. The follow-up of women who have become pregnant as a result of the ART attempt has also to be personalized. This should be done taking into account both the basic data extracted from the patient's file and those derived from the experience gathered during the latest attempt. Last but not least, the individual condition of each couple has to be taken into account when counseling the patients as to the urgency of the actions to be taken to resolve their fertility problem.

Towards Personalized Antioxidant Use in Female Infertility: Need for More Molecular and Clinical Studies

Treatment with antioxidants is increasingly used to slow down aging processes in different organs of the human body, including those implicated in female fertility. There is a plethora of different natural, synthetic or semi-synthetic medicines available on the market; most of them can be purchased without medical prescription. Even though the use of antioxidants, even under conditions of auto-medication, was shown to improve many functions related to female infertility related to oxidative stress, the lack of medical control and supervision can lead to an overmedication resulting in an opposite extreme, reductive stress, which can be counterproductive with regard to reproductive function and produce various adverse health effects in general. This paper reviews the current knowledge relative to the effects of different antioxidants on female reproductive function. The persisting gaps in this knowledge are also highlighted, and the need for medical supervision and personalization of antioxidant prescription is underscored.

A 10-Year Perspective on the Utility of Three Adjuvants Often Used in IVF: Growth Hormone, Melatonin and DHEA

Since 2010, numerous studies reported from PIVET, a pioneer IVF facility established over 40 years ago, have explored the use of three adjuvants designed to improve laboratory and clinical outcomes in cases where a poor prognosis has been demonstrated. The adjuvants reported commenced with recombinant growth hormone (rGH), followed by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) after developing a unique troche to avoid the first-pass effect and, subsequently, melatonin. The studies show that rGH is beneficial in the situation where women have poor-quality embryos in the setting of additional poor prognosis factors, such as advanced female age, a very low ovarian reserve, an insulin growth factor profile in the lowest quartile or recurrent implantation failure. The studies also imply that the adjuvants may actually reduce live birth productivity rates if used on women without poor prognosis factors; hence, further studies, which can now be better designed, should be undertaken to explore the notion of underlying adult growth hormone deficiency in some cases as well as the suggestion that DHEA can provide equivalent benefits in some poor prognosis settings. Melatonin showed no suggestive benefits in any of the studies and can be excluded from consideration in this context. Future studies should compare rGH and DHEA with a focus on those women who have poor embryo quality with additional poor prognosis factors. Such trials should be extended to 12 weeks to cover the entire period of oocyte activation.