Multimodal Non-Surgical Treatments of Aggressive Pituitary Tumors

Diagnosis and Management of Aggressive/Refractory Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

The majority of acromegaly and gigantism are caused by growth hormone-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Most cases can be cured or controlled by surgery, medical therapy, and/or radiotherapy. However, a few of these tumors are resistant to traditional therapy and always have a poor prognosis. The title aggressive/refractory is used to differentiate them from pituitary carcinomas. To date, there is no definitive conclusion on how to diagnose aggressive/refractory growth hormone-secreting PitNETs, which may have slowed the process of exploring new therapeutical strategies. We summarized the literature described diagnosis and treatment of the disease. Potential disease markers and prospective therapies were also included.

Treatment of an Aggressive Gonadotroph Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor With 177Lutetium DOTATATE Radionuclide Therapy

Aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) present significant morbidity, and multimodal therapies including surgery, radiotherapy, and medications are frequently required. Chemotherapy, particularly temozolomide, is often pursued for tumors that progress despite these treatments. Although peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is approved for the treatment of well-differentiated gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, its use in aggressive PitNETs is limited. We describe the case of a 65-year-old man who presented with vision changes and hypopituitarism at age 33 secondary to a nonfunctioning gonadotroph PitNET. His initial treatment included a craniotomy followed by radiation therapy. With tumor regrowth, he required transsphenoidal surgeries at age 44 and age 52. At age 56, further tumor regrowth and a positive octreotide scan prompted treatment with long-acting octreotide for 1 year. Given absent tumor response, 12 cycles (4 treatment cycles and 8 maintenance cycles) of PRRT with 177Lutetium-DOTATATE were pursued. This resulted in partial response with significant tumor shrinkage. Notably, there was no tumor regrowth 40 months after treatment discontinuation. This is only the second report on the effectiveness of PRRT in patients with aggressive gonadotroph PitNETs. We also provide an overview of PRRT for PitNETs and describe clinical outcomes previously reported in the literature.

Autophagy inhibition suppresses hormone production and cell growth in pituitary tumor cells: A potential approach to pituitary tumors

Pituitary tumors (PTs) represent about 10% of all intracranial tumors, and most are benign. However, some PTs exhibit continued growth despite multimodal therapies. Although temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating chemotherapeutic agent, is a first-line medical treatment for aggressive PTs, some PTs are resistant to TMZ. Existing literature indicated the involvement of autophagy in cell growth in several types of tumors, including PTs, and autophagy inhibitors have anti-tumor effects. In this study, the expression of several autophagy-inducible genes, including Atg3, Beclin1, Map1lc3A, Map1lc3b, Ulk1, Wipi2, and Tfe3 in two PT cell lines, the mouse corticotroph AtT-20 cells and the rat mammosomatotroph GH4 cells were identified. Down regulation of Tfe3, a master switch of basal autophagy, using RNA interference, suppressed cell proliferation in AtT-20 cells, suggesting basal autophagy contributes to the maintenance of cellular functions in PT cells. Expectedly, treatment with bafilomycin A1, an autophagy inhibitor, suppressed cell proliferation, increased the cleavage of PARP1, and reduced ACTH production in AtT-20 cells. Treatment with two additional autophagy inhibitors, chloroquine (CQ) and monensin, demonstrated similar effects on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and ACTH production in AtT-20 cells. Also, treatment with CQ suppressed cell proliferation and growth hormone production in GH4 cells. Moreover, the combination of CQ and TMZ had an additive effect on the inhibition of cell proliferation in AtT-20 and GH4 cells. The additive effect of anti-cancer drugs such as CQ alone or in combination with TMZ may represent a novel therapeutic approach for PTs, in particular tumors with resistance to TMZ.

Update on Current Evidence for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the third most frequently diagnosed intracranial tumors, with nonfunctioning PitNETs (nfPitNETs) accounting for 30% of all pituitary tumors and representing the most common type of macroPitNETs. NfPitNETs are usually benign tumors with no evidence of hormone oversecretion except for hyperprolactinemia secondary to pituitary stalk compression. Due to this, they do not typically present with clinical syndromes like acromegaly, Cushing's disease or hyperthyroidism and instead are identified incidentally on imaging or from symptoms of mass effects (headache, vision changes, apoplexy). With the lack of effective medical interventions, first-line treatment is transsphenoidal surgical resection, however, nfPitNETs often have supra- or parasellar extension, and total resection of the tumor is often not possible, resulting in residual tumor regrowth or reoccurrence. While functional PitNETs can be easily followed for recurrence using hormonal biomarkers, there is no similar parameter to predict recurrence in nfPitNETs, hence delaying early recognition and timely management. Therefore, there is a need to identify prognostic biomarkers that can be used for patient surveillance and as therapeutic targets. This review focuses on summarizing the current evidence on nfPitNETs, with a special focus on potential new biomarkers and therapeutics.

Comparison of microscopic transsphenoidal surgery and neuroendoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in pituitary adenoma resection and the risk factors of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage

OBJECTIVE

To compare microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (MTS) and neuroendoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (NTS) in pituitary adenoma (PA) resection and analyze the risk factors of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CFL).

METHODS

The clinical data of 127 patients with PA treated in Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 54 patients treated by MTS for PA resection were assigned to the control group, while the rest of the 73 patients treated by NTS for PA resection were assigned to the study group. The total tumor resection rate, decrease of hormone levels after operation, alleviation of primary symptoms and complications were compared between the two groups. Logistics regression analysis was conducted to analyze the risk factors of CFL.

RESULTS

The control group experienced a shorter operation time than the study group (P<0.001). The resection rates of the control and study groups were comparable, but the study group showed a lower incidence of postoperative complications than the control group (P = 0.004). In addition, the study group showed better alleviation of primary symptoms than the control group (P = 0.013). After surgery, the two groups presented decreased levels of prolactin and growth hormone (P<0.001), and also showed decreased average adrenocorticotropic hormone (P<0.001). Moreover, the two groups were not significantly different in the levels of prolactin, growth hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone after surgery (P>0.05). According to multivariate logistics regression analysis, body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.003, OR = 8.791, 95% CI: 2.050-37.693), intraoperative CFL (P = 0.002, OR = 21.614, 95% CI: 0.305-153.162) and therapeutic regimen (P = 0.011, OR = 7.060, 95% CI: 1.554-32.076) were independent risk factors for postoperative CFL.

CONCLUSION

Compared with MTS, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery requires a notably longer time, but it can strongly improve the total resection rate of patients and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Endoscopic surgery is a protective factor of postoperative CFL.

Refractory somatotroph adenomas

Somatotroph adenomas are usually controlled with standard therapy, which can include surgery, medical treatment and radiotherapy. Some tumors have a more aggressive behavior and are refractory to standard therapy. In this review, we summarize the phenotype of these tumors and the current options for their management.

The Effects of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy on the Neoplastic and Normal Pituitary

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) are usually benign and slow-growing; however, in some cases, they may behave aggressively and become resistant to conventional treatments. Therapeutic options for aggressive or metastatic PitNETs are limited, and currently mainly consist of temozolomide, with little experience of other emerging approaches, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Somatostatin receptor expression in PitNETs explains the effectiveness of somatostatin analogues for treating PitNETs, particularly those hypersecreting pituitary hormones, such as growth hormone or adrenocorticotropic hormone. The expression of such receptors in pituitary tumour cells has provided the rationale for using PRRT to treat patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs. However, the PRRT efficacy in this setting remains unestablished, as knowledge on this today is based only on few case reports and small series of cases, which are reviewed here. A total of 30 PRRT-treated patients have been thus far reported: 23 aggressive PitNETs, 5 carcinomas, and 2 of malignancy status unspecified. Of the 27 published cases with information regarding the response to PRRT, 5 (18%) showed a partial response, 8 (30%) had stable disease, and 14 (52%) had progressive disease. No major adverse effects have been reported, and there is also no increased risk of clinically relevant hypopituitarism in patients with pituitary or non-pituitary neuroendocrine tumours following PRRT. PRRT may be regarded as a safe option for patients with aggressive or metastatic PitNETs if other treatment approaches are not feasible or have failed in controlling the disease progression, with tumour shrinkage occurring in up to a fifth of cases, while about a third of aggressive pituitary tumours may achieve stable disease. Here, the data on PRRT in the management of patients with aggressive pituitary tumours are reviewed, as well as the effects of PRRT on the pituitary function in other PRRT-treated cancer patients.

Tumour microenvironment and pituitary tumour behaviour

The pituitary tumour microenvironment encompasses a spectrum of non-tumoural cells, such as immune, stromal or endothelial cells, as well as enzymes and signalling peptides like cytokines, chemokines and growth factors, which surround the tumour cells and may influence pituitary tumour behaviour and tumourigenic mechanisms. Recently, there has been intensive research activity in this field describing various pituitary tumour-infiltrating immune and stromal cell subpopulations, and immune- and microenvironment-related pathways. Key changes in oncological therapeutic avenues resulted in the recognition of pituitary as a target of adverse events for patients treated with immune checkpoint regulators. However, these phenomena can be turned into therapeutic advantage in severe cases of pituitary tumours. Therefore, unravelling the pituitary tumour microenvironment will allow a better understanding of the biology and behaviour of pituitary tumours and may provide further developments in terms of diagnosis and management of patients with aggressively growing or recurrent pituitary tumours.

Multidisciplinary management of difficult/aggressive growth-hormone pituitary neuro-endocrine tumors

Growth Hormone-secreting adenomas exhibits variable biological behavior and heterogeneous natural history, ranging from small adenomas and mild disease, to invasive and aggressive neoplasms with more severe clinical picture. Patients not cured or controlled after neurosurgical and first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) therapy could require multiple surgical, medical and/or radiation treatments to achieve disease control. To date, no clinical, laboratory, histopathological, or neuroradiological markers are able to define the aggressiveness or predict the disease prognosis in patients with acromegaly. Therefore, the management of these patients requires careful evaluation of laboratory assessments, diagnostic criteria, neuroradiology examinations, and neurosurgical approaches to choose an effective and patient-tailored medical therapy. A multidisciplinary approach is particularly useful in difficult/aggressive acromegaly to schedule multimodal treatment, which includes radiation therapy, chemotherapy with temozolomide and other, recent emerging treatments. Herein, we describe the role of the different members of the multidisciplinary team according to our personal experience; a flow-chart for the therapeutic approach of difficult/aggressive acromegaly patients is proposed.

Temozolomide and Capecitabine Treatment for an Aggressive Somatotroph Pituitary Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review

Aggressive somatotroph pituitary tumor that causes acromegaly is extremely rare and resists conventional treatments such as multiple surgeries, radiotherapies, and various types of somatostatin analogs. Here, we propose a novel treatment option for these rare cases by discussing our case and reviewing the literature. We experienced an aggressive somatotroph tumor in a 52-year-old woman with acromegaly. Not only could a complete remission of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) not be obtained, but the tumor continued to grow and eventually recurred around the brainstem despite multidisciplinary treatments. We employed immunohistochemistry and a three-dimensional (3D) spheroid ex vivo assay to determine the best treatment option for this case. Although histology showed strong O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase expression and high Ki-67 labeling index (22%), temozolomide (TMZ) combined with capecitabine (CAPTEM) treatment was performed based on the results of the patient-derived 3D spheroid ex vivo assay, which predicted more effective treatment with CAPTEM than with TMZ alone. Consequently, GH and IGF-1 levels were restored to normal range with remarkable tumor shrinkage after CAPTEM treatment. To the best of our knowledge, there have been even very few reports describing successful treatment for such aggressive and refractory somatotroph tumors and this is the first report showing the effectiveness of CAPTEM on refractory somatotroph tumor both ex vivo and in vivo.

Sprouting Angiogenesis in Human Pituitary Adenomas

Introduction

Angiogenesis in pituitary tumors is not fully understood, and a better understanding could help inform new pharmacologic therapies, particularly for aggressive pituitary tumors.

Materials and Methods

219 human pituitary tumors and 12 normal pituitary glands were studied. Angiogenic genes were quantified by an angiogenesis qPCR array and a TaqMan probe-based absolute qPCR. Angiogenesis inhibition in pituitary tumors was evaluated in vitro with the endothelial tube formation assay and in vivo in RbΔ19 mice.

Results

71 angiogenic genes, 40 of which are known to be involved in sprouting angiogenesis, were differentially expressed in pituitary tumors. Expression of endothelial markers CD31, CD34, and ENG was significantly higher in pituitary tumors, by 5.6, 22.3, and 8.2-fold, respectively, compared to in normal pituitary tissue. There was no significant difference in levels of the lymphatic endothelial marker LYVE1 in pituitary tumors compared with normal pituitary gland tissue. Pituitary tumors also expressed significantly higher levels of angiogenesis growth factors, including VEGFA (4.2-fold), VEGFB (2.2), VEGFC (19.3), PGF (13.4), ANGPT2 (9.2), PDGFA (2.7), PDGFB (10.5) and TGFB1 (3.8) compared to normal pituitary tissue. Expression of VEGFC and PGF was highly correlated with the expression of endothelial markers in tumor samples, including CD31, CD34, and ENG (endoglin, a co-receptor for TGFβ). Furthermore, VEGFR inhibitors inhibited angiogenesis induced by human pituitary tumors and prolonged survival of RbΔ19 mice.

Conclusion

Human pituitary tumors are characterized by more active angiogenesis than normal pituitary gland tissue in a manner consistent with sprouting angiogenesis. Angiogenesis in pituitary tumors is regulated mainly by PGF and VEGFC, not VEGFA and VEGFB. Angiogenesis inhibitors, such as the VEGFR2 inhibitor cabozantinib, may merit further investigation as therapies for aggressive human pituitary tumors.

Efficacy of temozolomide combined with capecitabine (CAPTEM) on refractory prolactinomas as assessed using an ex vivo 3D spheroid assay

PURPOSE

Refractory prolactinomas resistant to dopamine agonists (DAs) pose a clinical challenge. Temozolomide (TMZ) is a recommended treatment option, but its effects are difficult to predict, and the alternatives are limited. Recent reports suggested that TMZ combined with capecitabine (CAPTEM) can be effective for the treatment of aggressive pituitary tumors. This study sought to evaluate the effect of TMZ in an ex vivo three-dimensional (3D) spheroid culture assay and determine if this assay could be used to predict the therapeutic effect of CAPTEM in actual refractory prolactinomas.

METHODS

Surgically resected tumor tissues from two patients with refractory prolactinoma were cultured as 3D spheroids. The effects of TMZ were assessed based on its suppression of cell viability and reduction of prolactin (PRL) levels.

RESULTS

In Case 1, the 3D culture assay showed no effect of TMZ on cell viability or PRL suppression. Clinically, TMZ treatment did not reduce PRL levels (8870→8274 ng/mL) and the tumor progression. However, CAPTEM partially reduced PRL levels (9070→4046 ng/mL) and suppressed the tumor growth. In Case 2, TMZ in the 3D culture assay showed a 50% reduction of cell viability and 40% reduction of PRL levels. Clinically, CAPTEM was highly effective, with a considerable reduction in PRL level (17,500→210 ng/mL), and MRI showed almost no residual tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report to describe the effects of CAPTEM treatment on refractory prolactinomas. The ex vivo 3D spheroid culture assay reliably predicted TMZ sensitivity and informed the selection between TMZ or CAPTEM treatment for refractory prolactinomas.

Temozolomide Nonresponsiveness in Aggressive Prolactinomas and Carcinomas: Management and Outcomes

Context

Temozolomide (TMZ) is endorsed as the treatment of choice in aggressive or malignant pituitary adenomas.

Objective

Herein we describe a case of an aggressive prolactinoma that was resistant to TMZ. We performed a literature review of similar nonresponsive, aggressive prolactinomas.

Methods

A 40-year-old woman presented with a giant prolactinoma that required cabergoline, transsphenoidal surgery, and radiotherapy to achieve near-normal prolactin and apparently no residual tumor. A year later, she presented with multiple cranial nerve involvement due to a recurrent tumor extending to the infratemporal fossa. She underwent transfrontal surgery, second radiotherapy, and was started on TMZ. Despite 8 cycles of temozolomide (200 mg/m², 5/28-day cycle), she had progressive disease and ultimately succumbed to the disease. PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and prior review articles were searched for manuscripts about patients with aggressive prolactinomas who had been treated with TMZ. Data on demography, duration of therapy, and management outcomes were analyzed in those with progressive disease.

Results

We identified 94 cases of patients with aggressive/malignant prolactinomas in the literature who had received TMZ. Progressive disease despite TMZ was present in 36 cases (38%). There was a male preponderance (65%) among these and 40% had aggressive prolactinomas, whereas the rest had carcinomas. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (interquartile range, 3.5-11.5) of TMZ. O6‐methylguanine‐DNA‐methyltransferase (MGMT) immunostaining was negative in 35%. Overall mortality at the time of publication was 40%, at a duration varying from 2 to 20 years from diagnosis.

Conclusion

TMZ resistance in aggressive/malignant prolactinomas is challenging. Progressive disease on optimal TMZ treatment entails the use of newer agents.

Molecular Pathways in Prolactinomas: Translational and Therapeutic Implications

Prolactinoma has the highest incidence rate among patients with functional pituitary tumours. Although mostly benign, there is a subgroup that can be aggressive. Some clinical, radiological and pathology features have been associated with a poor prognostic. Therefore, it can be considered as a group of heterogeneous tumours. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the molecular pathways involved in the behaviour of prolactinoma in order to improve our approach and gain deeper insight into the better understanding of tumour development and its management. This is essential for identifying patients harbouring aggressive prolactinoma and to establish personalised therapeutics options.

A Silent Corticotroph Pituitary Carcinoma: Lessons From an Exceptional Case Report

Nowadays, neither imaging nor pathology evaluation can accurately predict the aggressiveness or treatment resistance of pituitary tumors at diagnosis. However, histological examination can provide useful information that might alert clinicians about the nature of pituitary tumors. Here, we describe our experience with a silent corticothoph tumor with unusual pathology, aggressive local invasion and metastatic dissemination during follow-up. We present a 61-year-old man with third cranial nerve palsy at presentation due to invasive pituitary tumor. Subtotal surgical approach was performed with a diagnosis of silent corticotroph tumor but with unusual histological features (nuclear atypia, frequent multinucleation and mitotic figures, and Ki-67 labeling index up to 70%). After a rapid regrowth, a second surgical intervention achieved successful debulking. Temozolomide treatment followed by stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy associated with temozolomide successfully managed the primary tumor. However, sacral metastasis showed up 6 months after radiotherapy treatment. Due to aggressive distant behavior, a carboplatine-etoposide scheme was decided but the patient died of urinary sepsis 31 months after the first symptoms. Our case report shows how the presentation of a pituitary tumor with aggressive features should raise a suspicion of malignancy and the need of follow up by multidisciplinary team with experience in its management. Metastases may occur even if the primary tumor is well controlled.