Are Markers of Systemic Inflammatory Response Useful in the Management of Patients With Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

The predictive value of systemic immune-inflammatory markers before and after treatment for pathological complete response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study of 1994 patients

PURPOSE

Systemic immune-inflammatory markers have a certain predictive role in pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in breast cancer. However, there is a lack of research exploring the predictive value of markers after treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study collected data from 1994 breast cancer patients who underwent NAT. Relevant clinical and pathological characteristics were included, and pre- and post-treatment complete blood cell counts were evaluated to calculate four systemic immune-inflammatory markers: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). The optimal cutoff values for these markers were determined using ROC curves, and patients were classified into high-value and low-value groups based on these cutoff values. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to analyze factors influencing pCR. The factors with independent predictive value were used to construct a nomogram.

RESULTS

After NAT, 383 (19.2%) patients achieved pCR. The area under the ROC curve is generally larger for post-treatment markers compared to pre-treatment markers. Pre-treatment NLR and PLR, as well as post-treatment LMR and SII, were identified as independent predictive factors for pCR, along with Ki-67, clinical tumor stage, clinical lymph node stage, molecular subtype, and clinical response. Higher pre-NLR (OR = 1.320; 95% CI 1.016-1.716; P = 0.038), pre-PLR (OR = 1.474; 95% CI 1.058-2.052; P = 0.022), post-LMR (OR = 1.532; 95% CI 1.175-1.996; P = 0.002), and lower post-SII (OR = 0.596; 95% CI 0.429-0.827; P = 0.002) are associated with a higher likelihood of achieving pCR. The established nomogram had a good predictive performance with an area under the ROC curve of 0.754 (95% CI 0.674-0.835).

CONCLUSION

Both pre- and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammatory markers have a significant predictive role in achieving pCR after NAT in breast cancer patients. Indeed, it is possible that post-treatment markers have stronger predictive ability compared to pre-treatment markers.

Prognostic value of inflammation-related biomarkers in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hematological indicators of chronic systemic inflammation are significant biomarkers for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of certain factors on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with GEP-NENs. These factors include the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. After searching the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2000 to October 20, 2022 and the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference proceedings from January 1, 2017, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify the origins of heterogeneity and examine the impact of factor grouping. The effects of the cut-off values and sample size were assessed by meta-regression. The results revealed that higher NLRs, PLRs, and CRP levels were associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.55-2.8; HR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.40-2.28; and HR = 2.88, 95% CI = 2.09-3.95, respectively; all p < 0.001). Higher NLRs and lower LMRs were associated with shorter DFS (HR = 3.34, 95% CI = 2.11-5.29 and HR = 2.71, 95% CI = 2.27-3.24, respectively; both p < 0.001). Higher PLRs and CRP levels were correlated with shorter PFS (HR = 3.48, 95% CI = 1.34-9.03, p = 0.01 and HR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.63-6.08, p = 0.001). As demonstrated in the research, hematological indicators of systemic inflammation are promising biomarkers for GEP-NEN assessment.

Alteration of the immunophenotype and cytokine profiles in patients affected by neuroendocrine neoplasms

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are tumors that arise from cells of the endocrine system and are most common in the gastrointestinal tract, the pancreas, and the lungs. Their incidence is rapidly increasing and the therapeutic options available are limited.

METHODS

Since the immune system can interfere with tumor growth and response to therapy, using flow cytometry we investigated the immunophenotype in samples of peripheral blood leukocytes from patients with pancreatic (Pan-NENs) and pulmonary NENs (Lung-NENs). Moreover, we performed a multiplex analysis of 13 key cytokines and growth factors essential for the immune response in the plasma of NEN patients and controls.

RESULTS

Patients presented with a higher percentage of granulocytes, a lower percentage of lymphocytes, and an increase in the granulocytes to lymphocytes ratio compared to healthy donors. These alterations were more marked in patients with metastasis. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) restored the immunophenotype of patients to that seen in healthy donors. Finally, Pan-NEN patients showed a higher plasma concentration of IP-10, MCP-1, and IL-8 compared to healthy donors, suggesting a potential role for these cytokines as diagnostic biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted differences in the immunophenotype of patients with Pan- and Lung-NENs compared to healthy individuals; these alterations were partially restored by therapy.

Potential new applications of immunotherapy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: immune landscape, current status and future perspectives

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a highly heterogeneous class of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells and peptidergic neurons. After failure of first-line treatment, patients have poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may be a powerful means of increasing therapeutic efficacy for such patients, but ICIs alone have low response rates and short disease control durations in most NENs and may be effective for only a portion of the population. ICIs combined with other immunotherapies, targeted therapies, or cytotoxic drugs have achieved some efficacy in patients with NENs and are worthy of further exploration to assess their benefits to the population. In addition, accumulating experimental and clinical evidence supports that the interaction between neuroendocrine and immune systems is essential to maintain homeostasis, and assessment of this broad neuroendocrine-immune correlation is essential for NEN treatment. In this review, we summarize the immune microenvironment characteristics, advances in immunotherapy, predictive biomarkers of ICI efficacy for NENs, and the effects of common endocrine hormones on the immune system, highlighting possible new application areas for this promising treatment in neglected NENs.

Inflammation Related to Obesity in the Etiopathogenesis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare neoplasms, which, due to their heterogeneous nature, non-specific symptoms, and lack of specific tumor markers pose many diagnostic and clinical challenges. In recent years, the effectiveness of GEP-NEN diagnosis has increased, which is probably associated with the greater availability of diagnostic tests and the cooperation of many experienced specialists in various scientific disciplines. In addition to the possible genetic etiology, the cause of GEP-NET development is not fully understood. Inflammation and obesity are known risks that contribute to the development of many diseases. Chronic inflammation accompanying obesity affects the hormonal balance and cell proliferation and causes the impairment of the immune system function, leading to neoplastic transformation. This review explores the role of inflammation and obesity in GEP-NETs. The exact mechanisms inducing tumor growth are unknown; however, the profile of inflammatory factors released in the GEP-NET tumor microenvironment is responsible for the progression or inhibition of tumor growth. Both the excess of adipose tissue and the impaired function of the immune system affect not only the initiation of cancer but also reduce the comfort and lifetime of patients.

Inflammatory Cytokines Associated with Diagnosis, Tumor Grade and Prognosis in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background and aims: Inflammatory cytokines represent diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in manifold cancers. Recent data suggest a pivotal role of these cytokines in different biological processes involved in the development of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, their role as biomarkers in NETs is only poorly understood. Methods: We analyzed serum concentrations of 13 inflammation-related cytokines at different time points in 43 patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic NETs (G1/G2) treated at Charité Berlin and compared them to 40 healthy controls. The results were correlated with clinical records. Results: Serum concentrations (Median (Interquartile Range (IQR)) in pg/mL) of IL-1β (124 (82) vs. 68 (61) pg/mL; p = 0.0003), IL-6 (111(122) vs. 88 (32) pg/mL; p = 0.0086), IL-8 (1058 (768) vs. 210 (90) pg/mL; p < 0.0001), IL-18 (2936 (1723) vs. 1590 (704) pg/mL; p < 0.0001), and TNF (271 (260) vs. 42 (25) pg/mL; p < 0.0001) were significantly elevated in NET patients, whereas IL-10 (43 (44) vs. 105 (48) pg/mL; p < 0.0001) showed lower concentrations in NETs when compared to controls. Cytokine levels significantly correlated with tumor grade (IL-6; p = 0.0070), prevalence of distant metastasis (IL-18; p = 0.0313), and disease progression over time (IL-10; p = 0.0033) but not tumor location. Chromogranin A (CgA) and the NETest are currently used to monitor treatment response. A more accurate prediction could possibly be achieved by employing a subset of cytokines. Our data clearly warrants further functional investigation into the role of the immune response and cytokine release in NETs. Conclusion: A biologically plausible panel of cytokines might be added to the diagnostic and prognostic tools currently employed in patients with NETs. Combining different markers into a score would elevate diagnostic accuracy compared to single markers.

Clinical implications of immune checkpoint markers and immune infiltrates in patients with thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms

The potential response of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in thymic neuroendocrine neoplasms (T-NEN) is largely unknown and full of great expectations. The expression of immune checkpoint molecules and immune infiltrates greatly determine the response to ICB. However, studies regarding the immune landscape in T-NEN are scarce. This work was aimed to characterize the immune landscape and its association with clinical characteristics in T-NEN. The expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), and the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), monocytes, and granulocytes were determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining on tumor tissues from T-NEN. Immune landscapes were delineated and correlated with clinicopathological factors. We found that T-NEN with increased immune cell infiltration and enhanced expression of PD-1/PD-L1 tended to have restricted tumor size and less metastases. A higher density of CD8+ TILs was associated with a significantly lower rate of bone metastasis. In addition, we presented three cases of T-NEN who progressed after multiple lines of therapies and received ICB for alternative treatment. ICB elicited durable partial responses with satisfactory safety in two patients with atypical carcinoid, but showed resistance in 1 patient with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. This innovative study delineated for the first time the heterogeneous immune landscape in T-NEN and identified CD8+ TILs as a potential marker to predict bone metastasis. An “immune-inflamed” landscape with the presence of TILs predominated in T-NEN, making T-NEN a potentially favorable target for ICB treatment. Further judicious designs of “tailor-made” clinical trials of ICB in T-NEN are urgently needed.

Identification of a new prognostic score for patients with high-grade metastatic GEP-NEN treated with palliative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN G3) are rare and heterogeneous malignancies with poor prognosis. Aim of this study was to develop prognosticators identifying those patients that derive the most benefit from currently available systemic therapies.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 78 patients with metastatic GEP-NEN G3. For patients with imaging data available (n = 52), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic value of selected clinical and blood-based biomarkers. The impact of palliative chemotherapy regimens on time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) was assessed.

RESULTS

Median OS of the study cohort was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.0-11.1). The majority of patients received first-line treatment with platinum plus etoposide (83.3%). The ORR and DCR of the RECIST-evaluable subgroup were 34.6% and 76.9%. Median TTF upon first-line treatment was 4.9 months (95% CI 3.4-6.4). Multivariate analysis identified the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and absolute lymphocyte count as independent prognostic factors. A prognostic score based on these parameters discriminated patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of patients with GEP-NEN G3 are still limited. A new prognostic score identifying those patients benefitting from current platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy protocols may help as stratification factor in future trial design.

Emerging Management Approach for the Adverse Events of Immunotherapy of Cancer

Immunotherapy, which stimulates the body’s immune system, has received a considerable amount of press in recent years because of its powerful benefits. Cancer immunotherapy has shown long-term results in patients with advanced disease that are not seen with traditional chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines like interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interferon-alpha (IFN), and the cancer vaccine sipuleucel-T have all been licensed and approved by the FDA for the treatment of various cancers. These immunotherapy treatments boost anticancer responses by stimulating the immune system. As a result, they have the potential to cause serious, even fatal, inflammatory and immune-related side effects in one or more organs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are two immunotherapy treatments that are increasingly being used to treat cancer. Following their widespread usage in the clinic, a wave of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) impacting virtually every system has raised concerns about their unpredictability and randomness. Despite the fact that the majority of adverse effects are minimal and should be addressed with prudence, the risk of life-threatening complications exists. Although most adverse events are small and should be treated with caution, the risk of life-threatening toxicities should not be underestimated, especially given the subtle and unusual indications that make early detection even more difficult. Treatment for these issues is difficult and necessitates a multidisciplinary approach involving not only oncologists but also other internal medicine doctors to guarantee quick diagnosis and treatment. This study’s purpose is to give a fundamental overview of immunotherapy and cancer-related side effect management strategies.

Advances in Knowledge and Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Cancer Immunotherapy

Immune-oncologic (IO) therapy has revolutionized the treatment and management of oncologic disease. Immunotherapy functions by enhancing the host immune-systems ability to endogenously clear malignant cells, however, this activation can also lead to immune-mediated damage to healthy native tissues. These side effects are known as immune-related adverse events or irAEs and can even present with phenotypes similar to autoimmune diseases. IrAEs are the major consequence of checkpoint inhibitors and can have a significant impact on a patient's cancer treatment and long-term quality of life. The management of these irAEs follows a similar approach to autoimmune diseases. More specifically, the management is akin to that of autoimmune disease exacerbations. While there is an array of immune-suppressing agents that can be used, steroids, immunomodulators and IO discontinuation are cornerstones of irAE management. The exact approach and dosing are based on the severity and subtype of irAE presented. Within recent years, there has been a push to better prevent and manage irAEs when they arise. There has been an additional effort to increase the number of steroid-sparing agents available for irAE treatment given the consequences of long-term steroid therapy as well as patient contraindications to steroids. The goals of this review are to summarize irAE management, highlight significant advances made in recent years and emphasize the future directions that will optimize the use of IO therapy in oncology.