The Nursing Effect of Individualized Management on Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Hypertension

Prevalence of hypertension among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hypertension in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using the results of a regional study. The studies were reviewed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, Wan Fang Data and Chinese Science Citation Database. After screening articles and data extraction, Stata V.16 was used for statistical analysis. This study was registered in the Prospective Register Systematic Reviews (CRD42020170649). A total of 2126 articles were identified, and nine papers were finally included. Random-effects modelling showed that the pooled prevalence of hypertension among Chinese patients with T2DM was 54% (95% CI 47 to 61%). Subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence in men (59.8%; 95% CI 49.0 to 70.7%) was higher than that in women (40.2%; 95% CI 29.3 to 59.2%). The prevalence in North China was higher than that in East China. The prevalence in institution-based settings (56%; 95% CI 48 to 64%) was higher than that in community-based settings (51%; 95% CI 34 to 69%). Appropriate preventive measures should be undertaken, such as health education, to control and reduce the risk of hypertension in diabetic patients and reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease.

Association of pulse pressure with all-cause mortality in older Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A observational cohort study

AIM

Although systolic and diastolic blood pressures as well as blood glucose are monitored when nurses care for patients with type 2 diabetes, the same is not true for pulse pressure. We aimed to determine the association between pulse pressure and all-cause mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal study of outpatients with type 2 diabetes aged 65 years and older at diabetes-specialized hospitals in Japan from September 2004 to December 2016. Descriptive data, blood pressure measurements, blood analysis data, and information on life and death were obtained from medical records. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We analyzed 357 of the 383 recruited patients (mean age, 74.9 years; 175 men and 182 women; average follow-up, 7.7 years), and 50 patients died. After adjusting for covariates, the relative risks for pulse pressures of 55 to <65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 mmHg (reference: <55 mmHg) were 1.77 (95% confidence interval: [0.59, 5.28]), 2.66 (95% confidence interval: [0.93, 7.56]), and 3.23 (95% confidence interval: [1.16, 8.99]), respectively. The relative risk for the 65 mmHg or higher group (reference: <65 mmHg) was 2.08 (95% confidence interval: [1.11, 3.92]). Neither systolic blood pressure nor diastolic blood pressure alone were significantly associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients with type 2 diabetes, a wide pulse pressure was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Nurses caring for older people with diabetes should also monitor pulse pressure.