1
|
Salcido EL, van Riper CJ, Stewart WP, Leitschuh BA. Roles for Wildlife in the Development of Place Meanings Ascribed to a Protected Area. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2023; 72:1072-1085. [PMID: 37584679 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-023-01869-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Wildlife play prominent roles in popular images of America's outdoor landscapes, yet our understanding of their contribution to place meanings is not fully developed. Although environmental management agencies have a long history of stewarding wildlife for hunting and fishing, they have been less inclined to prioritize non-consumptive uses such as the contribution of wildlife to sense of place. Given that agencies are increasingly challenged to implement policies that align with citizen priorities, connecting wildlife to sense of place could lead to more effective decisions. Our research explored the plurality of connections that residents made with wildlife in multiple protected areas across the USA region of Interior Alaska. Residents of nine communities were engaged over a five-year period, followed by a thematic analysis of interview data, which resulted in the identification of seven place meaning themes. These themes reflected qualities of the local environment that were appreciated by residents, including: 1) desirable travel destination, 2) distinct sense of community, 3) landscape of subsistence and tradition, 4) landscape of wildlife habitat, 5) natural resources in need of harvesting, 6) rural Alaskan lifestyle, and 7) wildland areas tied to recreation. Native wildlife species-from traditionally charismatic species like moose (Alces alces) to less iconic species such as snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) - were discussed in the context of all seven place meaning themes. Wildlife provided a basis for study participants to interpret landscapes and ascribe meanings to places, thus supporting our argument that shared influences of wildlife and place meanings should be prioritized in environmental planning and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan L Salcido
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
| | - Carena J van Riper
- Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
| | - William P Stewart
- Department of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 104 George Huff Hall, 1206 S 4th St, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA
| | - Benjamin A Leitschuh
- Department of Recreation, Sport and Tourism, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 104 George Huff Hall, 1206 S 4th St, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Puri M, Srivathsa A, Karanth KK, Patel I, Kumar NS. Safe space in the woods: Mechanistic spatial models for predicting risks of human–bear conflicts in India. Biotropica 2023. [DOI: 10.1111/btp.13204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mahi Puri
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
- Centre for Wildlife Studies Bengaluru India
| | - Arjun Srivathsa
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
- Wildlife Conservation Society–India Bengaluru India
- School of Natural Resources and Environment University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA
- National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR Bengaluru India
| | - Krithi K. Karanth
- Centre for Wildlife Studies Bengaluru India
- Environmental Science and Policy, Nicholas School of the Environment Duke University Durham North Carolina USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nesbitt HK, Metcalf AL, Metcalf EC, Costello CM, Roberts LL, Lewis MS, Gude JA. Human dimensions of grizzly bear conservation: The social factors underlying satisfaction and coexistence beliefs in Montana,
USA. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2023. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Holly K. Nesbitt
- Department of Society & Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation University of Montana Montana USA
| | - Alexander L. Metcalf
- Department of Society & Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation University of Montana Montana USA
- Wildlife Biology Program Department of Society and Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana Missoula Montana United States
| | - Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf
- Department of Society & Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation University of Montana Montana USA
- Wildlife Biology Program Department of Society and Conservation, WA Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, University of Montana Missoula Montana United States
| | | | - Lori L. Roberts
- Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Helena Montana USA
| | - Mike S. Lewis
- Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Helena Montana USA
| | - Justin A. Gude
- Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, & Parks Helena Montana USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lamb C, Smit L, McLellan B, Vander Vennen LM, Proctor M. Considerations for furbearer trapping regulations to prevent grizzly bear toe amputation and injury. WILDLIFE SOC B 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton Lamb
- Department of Biology University of British Columbia Kelowna BC V1V 1V7 Canada
| | - Laura Smit
- Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development Nelson BC V1L 4K3 Canada
| | - Bruce McLellan
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature Bear Specialist Group, D'Arcy BC V0N 1L0 Canada
| | - Lucas M. Vander Vennen
- Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development Nelson BC V1L 4K Canada
| | - Michael Proctor
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature Bear Specialist Group Kaslo BC V0G 1M0 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gebo B, Takele S, Shibru S. Perception and attitude of the local people toward carnivore population and conservation in the
Faragosa‐Fura
landscape of the Southern Rift Valley, Ethiopia. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Berhanu Gebo
- Department of Biology College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University Arba Minch Ethiopia
| | - Serekebirhan Takele
- Department of Biology College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University Arba Minch Ethiopia
| | - Simon Shibru
- Department of Biology College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University Arba Minch Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hughes C, Tremblett K, Kummer J, Lee TS, Duke D. How Can We Do Citizen Science Better? A Case Study Evaluating Grizzly Bear Citizen Science Using Principles of Good Practice in Alberta, Canada. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12091068. [PMID: 35565495 PMCID: PMC9102148 DOI: 10.3390/ani12091068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Citizen science offers an excellent opportunity to engage the public in scientific data collection, educational opportunities, and applied management. However, the practicalities of developing a citizen science program, from generating ideas to developing tools, implementing programming, and evaluating outcomes, are complex and challenging. To address challenges and provide a foundation for practitioners, scientists, and the public, the Government of Alberta developed a set of citizen science principles. Here, we use these principles as an evaluative framework to assess the outcomes of the GrizzTracker program, which was developed to help inform provincial species-at-risk recovery efforts. While the program experienced some successes, we identified challenges, including skepticism from the scientific community about the utility of citizen science and a lack of program leadership, staff capacity, and funding needs for long-term implementation. Reflecting on the principles, we provide policy recommendations that future citizen science programs can consider. Abstract Citizen science offers an excellent opportunity to engage the public in scientific data collection, educational opportunities, and applied management. However, the practicalities of developing and implementing citizen science programming are often more complex than considered. Some challenges to effective citizen science include scientists’ skepticism about the ability of public participants to rigorously collect quality data; a lack of clarity on or confidence in the utility of data; scientists’ hesitancy in engaging the public in projects; limited financial commitments; and challenges associated with the temporal and geographic scales of projects. To address these challenges, and provide a foundation upon which practitioners, scientists, and the public can credibly engage in citizen science, the Government of Alberta developed a set of citizen science principles. These principles offer a framework for planning, designing, implementing, and evaluating citizen science projects that extend beyond Alberta. Here, we present a case study using these principles to evaluate GrizzTracker, a citizen science program developed to help inform provincial species-at-risk recovery efforts. While we found that GrizzTracker applied each of the six principles in some way, including successful public engagement, strengthened relationships, and raising public awareness about northwest Alberta’s grizzly bears, we also identified a number of challenges. These included ongoing skepticism from the traditional scientific community about the utility of citizen science and governance challenges related to program leadership, staff capacity, and funding. By using the principles as a guideline, we provide policy recommendations for future citizen science efforts, including considerations for program design, implementation, and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Hughes
- Alberta Environment and Parks, Government of Alberta, 9607 Shand Avenue, Box 239, Grande Cache, AB T0E 0Y0, Canada; (K.T.); (J.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Krista Tremblett
- Alberta Environment and Parks, Government of Alberta, 9607 Shand Avenue, Box 239, Grande Cache, AB T0E 0Y0, Canada; (K.T.); (J.K.)
| | - Justine Kummer
- Alberta Environment and Parks, Government of Alberta, 9607 Shand Avenue, Box 239, Grande Cache, AB T0E 0Y0, Canada; (K.T.); (J.K.)
| | - Tracy S. Lee
- Miistakis Institute, Mount Royal University, Rm U271 Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada; (T.S.L.); (D.D.)
| | - Danah Duke
- Miistakis Institute, Mount Royal University, Rm U271 Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada; (T.S.L.); (D.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Effectiveness of community-based livestock protection strategies: a case study of human–lion conflict mitigation. ORYX 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s0030605321000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Conservation scientists are increasingly recognizing the need to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to improve human–wildlife coexistence across different contexts. Here we assessed the long-term efficacy of the Long Shields Community Guardians programme in Zimbabwe. This community-based programme seeks to protect livestock and prevent depredation by lions Panthera leo through non-lethal means, with the ultimate aim of promoting human–lion coexistence. Using a quasi-experimental approach, we measured temporal trends in livestock depredation by lions and the prevalence of retaliatory killing of lions by farmers and wildlife managers. Farmers that were part of the Long Shields programme experienced a significant reduction in livestock loss to lions, and the annual number of lions subject to retaliatory killing by farmers dropped by 41% since the start of the programme in 2013, compared to 2008–2012, before the programme was initiated. Our findings demonstrate the Long Shields programme can be a potential model for limiting livestock depredation by lions. More broadly, our study demonstrates the effectiveness of community-based interventions to engage community members, improve livestock protection and ameliorate levels of retaliatory killing, thereby reducing human–lion conflict.
Collapse
|
8
|
Morehouse AT, Hughes C, Manners N, Bectell J, Tigner J. Dealing With Deadstock: A Case Study of Carnivore Conflict Mitigation From Southwestern Alberta. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.786013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Livestock deaths are an unfortunate reality for livestock producers and dead livestock (i.e., deadstock) disposal options can have implications beyond the ranch itself. In Alberta, Canada, natural disposal (i.e., disposing of the carcass in a manner that allows for scavenging) has increased since the 2003 detection of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in Canadian cattle. Prior to BSE, rendering companies removed deadstock for free. However, rendering companies started charging producers to remove deadstock to offset costs associated with new regulatory requirements enacted by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which has resulted in increased on-farm natural disposal of deadstock. This increase has ecological implications because deadstock are a major attractant for large carnivores. Carnivores feeding on deadstock are often near other agricultural attractants such as stored grain and feed, silage, and living livestock, which can exacerbate conflict potential and pose a risk to human safety. To help mitigate conflicts associated with deadstock, the Waterton Biosphere Reserve's (a local non-profit) Carnivores and Communities Program (CACP) supported expansion of community deadstock removal efforts beginning in 2009, including reimbursement of on-farm removal costs, bear-resistant deadstock bins, and a livestock compost facility (operational 2013–2014). Here, we present an evaluative case study describing the development, implementation, and results of the deadstock removal program, including the compost facility. We tracked the number of head of livestock removed each year, the number of participating landowners, the average cost per head, and total program costs. We also used an online survey to assess participants' perspectives of the deadstock removal program and future needs. To date, the CACP has removed >5,400 livestock carcasses, representing between 15.1 and 22.6% of available carcasses in the program area, and 67.3% of livestock owners indicated they currently use the deadstock removal program to dispose of deadstock. Average cost to compost an animal was significantly less than other removal methods ($36.89 composting vs. $79.59 non-composting, one-tailed t-test, unequal sampling variances: t = 4.08, df = 5.87, p = 0.003). We conclude by discussing both ecological and social implications for deadstock removal as a conflict mitigation measure and make suggestions for future management considerations.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hughes C, Steenweg RJ, Vander Vennen LM, Melnycky NA, Fullerton L, Witiw JT, Morehouse A. Working Together for Grizzly Bears: A Collaborative Approach to Estimate Population Abundance in Northwest Alberta, Canada. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.719044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Grizzly bears are a threatened species in Alberta, Canada, and their conservation and management is guided by a provincial recovery plan. While empirical abundance and densities estimates have been completed for much of the province, empirical data are lacking for the northwest region of Alberta, a 2.8 million hectare area called Bear Management Area 1 (BMA 1). In part, this is due to limited staff capacity and funding to cover a vast geographic area, and a boreal landscape that is difficult to navigate. Using a collaborative approach, a multi-stakeholder working group called the Northwest Grizzly Bear Team (NGBT) was established to represent land use and grizzly bear interests across BMA 1. Collectively, we identified our project objectives using a Theory of Change approach, to articulate our interests and needs, and develop common ground to ultimately leverage human, social, financial and policy resources to implement the project. This included establishing 254 non-invasive genetic hair corral sampling sites across BMA 1, and using spatially explicit capture-recapture models to estimate grizzly bear density. Our results are two-fold: first we describe the process of developing and then operating within a collaborative, multi-stakeholder governance arrangement, and demonstrate how our approach was key to both improving relationships across stakeholders but also delivering on our grizzly bear project objectives; and, secondly we present the first-ever grizzly bear population estimate for BMA 1, including identifying 16 individual bears and estimating density at 0.70 grizzly bears/1,000 km2-the lowest recorded density of an established grizzly bear population in Alberta. Our results are not only necessary for taking action on one of Alberta's iconic species at risk, but also demonstrate the value and power of collaboration to achieve a conservation goal.
Collapse
|
10
|
Carter NH, Nelson P, Easter T. A call for a national collaborative predator coexistence programme. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Neil H. Carter
- School for Environment and Sustainability University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| | | | - Tara Easter
- School for Environment and Sustainability University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vasudeva V, Ramasamy P, Pal RS, Behera G, Karat PR, Krishnamurthy R. Factors Influencing People's Response Toward Tiger Translocation in Satkosia Tiger Reserve, Eastern India. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.664897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Local communities are an important stakeholder in any carnivore translocation programme and therefore, their acceptance of the translocation and support are essential to ensure its viability. Recent tiger augmentation efforts in Satkosia Tiger Reserve, India received mixed responses from the local communities, causing a stalemate in its progress. As a part of the adaptive management strategy, it was required to assess the concerns and issues to provide a practical solution. Hence, we analyzed the attitude of the people toward conservation in general and tiger specifically. We used structured questionnaire surveys and interviewed 1,932 households from 43 villages located in and around the reserve. We tested the influence of several variables representing four categories- (1) socio-economic, (2) ecosystem values and dependence, (3) relationship with the forest department and (4) losses and fear, on the attitude toward tiger conservation. The villages were clustered based on the responses received under these categories. While conserving forest was important to 91% of respondents, 71% of respondents supported wildlife conservation and only 35% felt important to conserve tiger. The logistic binary regression predicted that at the household level attitude toward tiger conservation is influenced positively by economic well-being, sense of forest ecosystem services, resource dependence and negatively influenced by restrictions from the forest department, and previous experience of loss due to wildlife. At the village level, literacy, resource dependence, access to clean cooking fuel and cooperation from the forest department predicted a positive attitude toward tiger conservation. Restriction from the forest department, fear for livestock, and experience of losses due to wildlife had a negative influence on attitude. We recommend that the villages in the landscape are prioritized based on their needs and accordingly, specific interventions are made to address their concerns. Future augmentation programme must give importance to intangible factors such as fear and perceived restrictions and opt for the involvement of the local community in the decision-making process.
Collapse
|
12
|
Streicher JP, Ramesh T, Downs CT. An Online Survey of Community Perceptions of Mammalian Mesocarnivores Across a Land-Use Gradient in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3957/056.051.0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jarryd P. Streicher
- Centre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg, 3209 South Africa
| | - Tharmalingam Ramesh
- Centre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg, 3209 South Africa
| | - Colleen T. Downs
- Centre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg, 3209 South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Akrim F, Mahmood T, Belant JL, Nadeem MS, Qasim S, Zangi IUD, Asadi MA. Livestock depredations by leopards in Pir Lasura National Park, Pakistan: characteristics, control and costs. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Faraz Akrim
- F. Akrim ✉ , Dept of Zoology, Univ. of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan
| | - Tariq Mahmood
- T. Mahmood, S. Qasim, I.-U.-D. Zangi and M. A. Asadi, Dept of Wildlife Management, PMAS-Arid Agriculture Univ., Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Jerrold L. Belant
- J. L. Belant, Global Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State Univ. of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | | - Siddiqa Qasim
- T. Mahmood, S. Qasim, I.-U.-D. Zangi and M. A. Asadi, Dept of Wildlife Management, PMAS-Arid Agriculture Univ., Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Imad-Ul-Din Zangi
- T. Mahmood, S. Qasim, I.-U.-D. Zangi and M. A. Asadi, Dept of Wildlife Management, PMAS-Arid Agriculture Univ., Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Arslan Asadi
- T. Mahmood, S. Qasim, I.-U.-D. Zangi and M. A. Asadi, Dept of Wildlife Management, PMAS-Arid Agriculture Univ., Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Hughes C, Frank B, Melnycky NA, Yarmey NT, Glikman JA. From worship to subjugation: Understanding stories about bears to inform conservation efforts. URSUS 2020. [DOI: 10.2192/ursus-d-19-00002.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Hughes
- University of Alberta, Department of Renewable Resources, 701 General Services Building, 9007-116 Street, NW Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
| | - Beatrice Frank
- Capital Regional District of Victoria, 490 Atkins Avenue, Victoria, BC V9B 2Z8, Canada
| | - Natalka A. Melnycky
- Government of Alberta, Environment and Parks, 9621 96 Avenue, Peace River, AB T8S 1T4, Canada
| | - Nicholas T. Yarmey
- University of Alberta, Augustana Campus, 4901-46 Avenue, Camrose, AB T4V 2R3, Canada
| | - Jenny Anne Glikman
- Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA-CSIC), Campo Santo de los Mártires 7, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Poor EE, Scheick BK, Mullinax JM. Multiscale consensus habitat modeling for landscape level conservation prioritization. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17783. [PMID: 33082467 PMCID: PMC7576151 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74716-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, wide-ranging carnivore populations are imperiled due to human-caused habitat fragmentation. Where populations are fragmented, habitat quantification is often the first step in conservation. Presence-only species distribution models can provide robust results when proper scales and data are considered. We aimed to identify habitat for a fragmented carnivore population at two scales and aid conservation prioritization by identifying potential future habitat fragmentation. We used location data and environmental variables to develop a consensus model using Maxent and Mahalanobis distance to identify black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) habitat across Florida, USA. We compared areas of habitat to areas of predicted sea level rise, development, and protected areas. Local-scale models performed better than state-scale models. We identified 23,798 km2 of habitat at the local-scale and 45,703 km2 at the state-scale. Approximately 10% of state- and 14% of local-scale habitat may be inundated by 2100, 16% of state- and 7% of local-scale habitat may be developed, and 54% of state- and 15% of local-scale habitat is unprotected. Results suggest habitat is at risk of fragmentation. Lack of focused conservation and connectivity among bear subpopulations could further fragmentation, and ultimately threaten population stability as seen in other fragmented carnivore populations globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Poor
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, 1433 Animal Science Building, 8127 Regents Dr., College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Brian K Scheick
- Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 1105 SW Williston Rd., Gainesville, FL, 32601, USA
| | - Jennifer M Mullinax
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, 1433 Animal Science Building, 8127 Regents Dr., College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
König HJ, Kiffner C, Kramer-Schadt S, Fürst C, Keuling O, Ford AT. Human-wildlife coexistence in a changing world. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:786-794. [PMID: 32406977 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) is a key topic in conservation and agricultural research. Decision makers need evidence-based information to design sustainable management plans and policy instruments. However, providing objective decision support can be challenging because realities and perceptions of human-wildlife interactions vary widely between and within rural, urban, and peri-urban areas. Land users who incur costs through wildlife argue that wildlife-related losses should be compensated and that prevention should be subsidized. Supporters of human-wildlife coexistence policies, such as urban-dwelling people, may not face threats to their livelihoods from wildlife. Such spatial heterogeneity in the cost and benefits of living with wildlife is germane in most contemporary societies. This Special Section features contributions on wildlife-induced damages that range from human perspectives (land use, psychology, governance, local attitudes and perceptions, costs and benefits, and HWC and coexistence theory) to ecological perspectives (animal behavior). Building on current literature and articles in this section, we developed a conceptual model to help frame HWC and coexistence dimensions. The framework can be used to determine damage prevention implementation levels and approaches to HWC resolution. Our synthesis revealed that inter- and transdisciplinary approaches and multilevel governance approaches can help stakeholders and institutions implement sustainable management strategies that promote human-wildlife coexistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannes J König
- Junior Research Group Human-Wildlife Conflict & Coexistence, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, Müncheberg, D-15374, Germany
| | - Christian Kiffner
- Center for Wildlife Management Studies, The School for Field Studies (SFS), PO Box 304, Karatu, Tanzania
| | - Stephanie Kramer-Schadt
- Department of Biology, Technische Universität Berlin (TUB), Rothenburgstr. 12, Berlin, D-12165, Germany
- Department of Ecological Dynamics, Leibniz Institute for Zoo- and Wildlife Research (IZW), Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, Berlin, D-10315, Germany
| | - Christine Fürst
- Institute for Geosciences and Geography, Dept. Sustainable Landscape Development, Martin-Luther University Halle (MLU), Von-Seckendorff-Platz 4, Halle (Saale), D-06120, Germany
| | - Oliver Keuling
- Institute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research (ITAW), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, Hannover, D-30173, Germany
| | - Adam T Ford
- Department of Biology, The University of British Columbia (UBC), 1177 Research Road, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Salvatori V, Balian E, Blanco JC, Ciucci P, Demeter L, Hartel T, Marsden K, Redpath SM, von Korff Y, Young JC. Applying Participatory Processes to Address Conflicts Over the Conservation of Large Carnivores: Understanding Conditions for Successful Management. Front Ecol Evol 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|