Strategies for Genomic Medicine Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Parents and Provider Perspectives on the Return of Genomic Findings for Cleft Families in Africa

BACKGROUND

Inadequate knowledge among health care providers (HCPs) and parents of affected children limits the understanding and utility of secondary genetic findings (SFs) in under-represented populations in genomics research. SFs arise from deep DNA sequencing done for research or diagnostic purposes and may burden patients and their families despite their potential health importance. This study aims to evaluate the perspective of both groups regarding SFs and their choices in the return of results from genetic testing in the context of orofacial clefts.

METHODS

Using an online survey, we evaluated the experiences of 252 HCPs and 197 parents across participating cleft clinics in Ghana and Nigeria toward the return of SFs across several domains.

RESULTS

Only 1.6% of the HCPs felt they had an expert understanding of when and how to incorporate genomic medicine into practice, while 50.0% agreed that all SFs should be returned to patients. About 95.4% of parents were willing to receive all the information from genetic testing (including SFs), while the majority cited physicians as their primary information source (64%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, parents and providers were aware that genetic testing could help in the clinical management of diseases. However, they cited a lack of knowledge about genomic medicine, uncertain clinical utility, and lack of available learning resources as barriers. The knowledge gained from this study will assist with developing guidelines and policies to guide providers on the return of SFs in sub-Saharan Africa and across the continent.

A team-based approach to cardiogenomic education

While many genetic professionals are involved in the education of lay and professional audiences, most do not have formal training in education theory and program design. Partnerships with adult education experts can provide additional resources and improve the level of instruction, thereby increasing the impact of an educational intervention. This report discusses the experience of a multidisciplinary team of educators, clinicians, and researchers partnering to develop evidence-based education for cardiology practitioners. It includes practical advice for how clinicians and educators can develop more effective education through collaboration, needs assessment, instructional design, and iterative content development.

Evaluating utility and feasibility of mismatch repair testing of colorectal cancer patients in a low-middle-income country

Molecular pathology services for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Sudan represent a significant unmet clinical need. In a retrospective cohort study involving 50 patients diagnosed with CRC at three major medical settings in Sudan, we aimed to outline the introduction of a molecular genetic service for CRC in Sudan, and to explore the CRC molecular features and their relationship to patient survival and clinicopathological characteristics. Mismatch repair (MMR) and BRAF (V600E) mutation status were determined by immunohistochemistry. A mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) subtype was demonstrated in 16% of cases, and a presumptive Lynch Syndrome (LS) diagnosis was made in up to 14% of patients. dMMR CRC in Sudan is characterized by younger age at diagnosis and a higher incidence of right-sided tumours. We report a high mortality in Sudanese CRC patients, which correlates with advanced disease stage, and MMR status. Routine MMR immunohistochemistry (with sequential BRAF mutation analysis) is a feasible CRC prognostic and predictive molecular biomarker, as well as a screening tool for LS in low-middle-income countries (LMICs).

An international genomics health workforce education priorities assessment

Aim: Global implementation of genomic medicine will require education of healthcare providers. There are limited international needs assessment data to guide curriculum development. Materials & methods: Genomics education experts developed and distributed a survey to individuals with knowledge of country-specific needs: 113 completed surveys (19% response rate) from 34 countries. A high percentage of respondents ranked non genetics physicians as the #1 target for genetics education. Over 70% indicated a need for moderate/extensive modification in physician training. The majority considered germline and somatic topics and targeting primary care and specialist providers equally important. Conclusion: Regardless of country economic level, there is a clear need for genomics education of healthcare providers. The study results can be used to focus future genomic medicine education efforts.

Advantages and Limitations of 16S rRNA Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Identification in the Diagnostic Microbiology Laboratory: Perspectives from a Middle-Income Country

Bacterial culture and biochemical testing (CBtest) have been the cornerstone of pathogen identification in the diagnostic microbiology laboratory. With the advent of Sanger sequencing and later, next-generation sequencing, 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing (16SNGS) has been proposed to be a plausible platform for this purpose. Nevertheless, usage of the 16SNGS platform has both advantages and limitations. In addition, transition from the traditional methods of CBtest to 16SNGS requires procurement of costly equipment, timely and sustainable maintenance of these platforms, specific facility infrastructure and technical expertise. All these factors pose a challenge for middle-income countries, more so for countries in the lower middle-income range. In this review, we describe the basis for CBtest and 16SNGS, and discuss the limitations, challenges, advantages and future potential of using 16SNGS for bacterial pathogen identification in diagnostic microbiology laboratories of middle-income countries.

Genetic testing for kidney disease of unknown etiology

In many cases of chronic kidney disease, the cause of disease remains unknown despite a thorough nephrologic workup. Genetic testing has revolutionized many areas of medicine and promises to empower diagnosis and targeted management of such cases of kidney disease of unknown etiology. Recent studies using genetic testing have demonstrated that Mendelian etiologies account for approximately 20% of cases of kidney disease of unknown etiology. Although genetic testing has significant benefits, including tailoring of therapy, informing targeted workup, detecting extrarenal disease, counseling patients and families, and redirecting care, it also has important limitations and risks that must be considered.