Genotype-Phenotype Correlation for Predicting Cochlear Implant Outcome: Current Challenges and Opportunities

Genetic landscape of hearing loss in prelingual deaf patients of eastern Iran: Insights from exome sequencing analysis

Hearing loss is one of the most prevalent genetic disorders in humans. Locus and allelic heterogeneity cause fundamental challenges in hearing loss genetic diagnosis and management of patients and their families. This study examined the genetic profile of patients with prelingual hearing loss who were referred to the Genetic Foundation of Khorasan Razavi spanning over a decade. Deleterious variants in GJB2 were evaluated through Sanger sequencing among 745 non-syndromic hearing loss patients. Furthermore, exome sequencing was applied in 250 patients with negative GJB2 sequencing results and 30 patients with syndromic hearing loss. The findings revealed a relatively low frequency of GJB2 variants among the studied patients. Exome sequencing successfully identified the genetic causes of hearing loss in 70% of the patients. Moreover, variants in 10 genes, namely SLC26A4, MYO15A, TMPRSS3, TMC1, OTOF, CDH23, PJVK, MYO7A, TECTA, and PCDH15, accounted for 66% of the positive exome sequencing findings in this study. At least three prevalent founder alleles in the hearing-impaired population of eastern Iran were identified. This study emphasizes the efficiency of exome sequencing as a powerful tool for determining the etiology of prelingual hearing loss in the eastern Iranian population.

Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With TMTC2 -Associated Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dys-Synchrony

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony.

PATIENTS

Adult and pediatric cochlear implant (CI) patients followed in an academic center who tested positive for TMTC2 genetic variant rs35725509.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech perception scores in quiet.

RESULTS

Ten CI patients were identified with TMTC2 variant rs35725509 out of 157 patients who underwent genetic testing (i.e., 6.3% of patients tested). All demonstrated progressive, bilateral hearing loss with severe-to-profound audiometric thresholds preoperatively. Pre-CI and 1-year post-CI speech recognition percent correct scores were compared. Post-CI speech perception (mean 61.0%, standard deviation 31.4%) was significantly higher than pre-CI speech perception (mean 21.0%, standard deviation 27.0%) ( p = 0.002). Individually, 9 of the 10 subjects experienced significant improvements in speech perception pre- to post-CI ( p < 0.05). Electrically evoked compound action potential measures were available for five patients, and all showed normal electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.

CONCLUSION

Patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony have significantly improved speech perception outcomes with cochlear implantation and should be considered candidates for this intervention if there are no other contraindications.

Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Electrocochleography (ECochG) appears to offer the most accurate prediction of post-cochlear implant hearing outcomes. This may be related to its capacity to interrogate the health of underlying cochlear tissue. The four major components of ECochG (cochlear microphonic [CM], summating potential [SP], compound action potential [CAP], and auditory nerve neurophonic [ANN]) are generated by different cochlear tissue components. Analyzing characteristics of these components can reveal the state of hair and neural cell in a cochlea. There is limited evidence on the characteristics of intracochlear (IC) ECochG recordings measured across the array postinsertion but compared with extracochlear recordings has better signal to noise ratio and spatial specificity. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between ECochG components recorded from an IC approach and postoperative speech perception or audiometric thresholds.

DESIGN

In 113 human subjects, responses to 500 Hz tone bursts were recorded at 11 IC electrodes across a 22-electrode cochlear implant array immediately following insertion. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the CM and added to one another to emphasize the SP, ANN, and CAP. Maximum amplitudes and extracochlear electrode locations were recorded for each of these ECochG components. These were added stepwise to a multi-factor generalized additive model to develop a best-fit model predictive model for pure-tone audiometric thresholds (PTA) and speech perception scores (speech recognition threshold [SRT] and consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme [CVC-P]) at 3- and 12-month postoperative timepoints. This best-fit model was tested against a generalized additive model using clinical factors alone (preoperative score, age, and gender) as a null model proxy.

RESULTS

ECochG-factor models were superior to clinical factor models in predicting postoperative PTA, CVC-P, and SRT outcomes at both timepoints. Clinical factor models explained a moderate amount of PTA variance ( r2 = 45.9% at 3-month, 31.8% at 12-month, both p < 0.001) and smaller variances of CVC-P and SRT ( r2 range = 6 to 13.7%, p = 0.008 to 0.113). Age was not a significant predictive factor. ECochG models explained more variance at the 12-month timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 52.9%, CVC-P = 39.6%, SRT = 36.4%) compared with the 3-month one timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 49.4%, CVC-P = 26.5%, SRT = 22.3%). The ECochG model was based on three factors: maximum SP deflection amplitude, and electrode position of CM and SP peaks. Adding neural (ANN and/or CAP) factors to the model did not improve variance explanation. Large negative SP deflection was associated with poorer outcomes and a large positive SP deflection with better postoperative outcomes. Mid-array peaks of SP and CM were both associated with poorer outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Postinsertion IC-ECochG recordings across the array can explain a moderate amount of postoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds. Maximum SP deflection and its location across the array appear to have a significant predictive value which may reflect the underlying state of cochlear health.

The multifaceted links between hearing loss and chronic kidney disease

Hearing loss affects nearly 1.6 billion people and is the third-leading cause of disability worldwide. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is also a common condition that is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and high health-care costs. From a developmental perspective, the structures responsible for hearing have a common morphogenetic origin with the kidney, and genetic abnormalities that cause familial forms of hearing loss can also lead to kidney disease. On a cellular level, normal kidney and cochlea function both depend on cilial activities at the apical surface, and kidney tubular cells and sensory epithelial cells of the inner ear use similar transport mechanisms to modify luminal fluid. The two organs also share the same collagen IV basement membrane network. Thus, strong developmental and physiological links exist between hearing and kidney function. These theoretical considerations are supported by epidemiological data demonstrating that CKD is associated with a graded and independent excess risk of sensorineural hearing loss. In addition to developmental and physiological links between kidney and cochlear function, hearing loss in patients with CKD may be driven by specific medications or treatments, including haemodialysis. The associations between these two common conditions are not commonly appreciated, yet have important implications for research and clinical practice.

Understanding the impact of modiolus porosity on stimulation of spiral ganglion neurons by cochlear implants

Moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in humans is treatable by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve (AN) with a cochlear implant (CI). In the cochlea, the modiolus presents a porous bony interface between the CI electrode and the AN. New bone growth caused by the presence of the CI electrode or neural degeneration inflicted by ageing or otological diseases might change the effective porosity of the modiolus and, thereby, alter its electrical material properties. Using a volume conductor description of the cochlea, with the aid of a 'mapped conductivity' method and an ad-hoc 'regionally kinetic' equation system, we show that even a slight variation in modiolus porosity or pore distribution can disproportionately affect AN stimulation. Hence, because of porosity changes, an inconsistent CI performance might occur if neural degeneration or new bone growth progress after implantation. Appropriate electrical material properties in accordance with modiolar morphology and pathology should be considered in patient-specific studies. The present first-of-its-kind in-silico study advocates for contextual experimental studies to further explore the utility of modiolus porous morphology in optimising the CI outcome.

Current phenotypic and genetic spectrum of syndromic deafness in Tunisia: paving the way for precision auditory health

Hearing impairment (HI) is a prevalent neurosensory condition globally, impacting 5% of the population, with over 50% of congenital cases attributed to genetic etiologies. In Tunisia, HI underdiagnosis prevails, primarily due to limited access to comprehensive clinical tools, particularly for syndromic deafness (SD), characterized by clinical and genetic heterogeneity. This study aimed to uncover the SD spectrum through a 14-year investigation of a Tunisian cohort encompassing over 700 patients from four referral centers (2007-2021). Employing Sanger sequencing, Targeted Panel Gene Sequencing, and Whole Exome Sequencing, genetic analysis in 30 SD patients identified diagnoses such as Usher syndrome, Waardenburg syndrome, cranio-facial-hand-deafness syndrome, and H syndrome. This latter is a rare genodermatosis characterized by HI, hyperpigmentation, hypertrichosis, and systemic manifestations. A meta-analysis integrating our findings with existing data revealed that nearly 50% of Tunisian SD cases corresponded to rare inherited metabolic disorders. Distinguishing between non-syndromic and syndromic HI poses a challenge, where the age of onset and progression of features significantly impact accurate diagnoses. Despite advancements in local genetic characterization capabilities, certain ultra-rare forms of SD remain underdiagnosed. This research contributes critical insights to inform molecular diagnosis approaches for SD in Tunisia and the broader North-African region, thereby facilitating informed decision-making in clinical practice.

An Emerging Approach of Age-Related Hearing Loss Research: Application of Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis

As one of the most common otologic diseases in the elderly, age-related hearing loss (ARHL) usually characterized by hearing loss and cognitive disorders, which have a significant impact on the elderly's physical and mental health and quality of life. However, as a typical disease of aging, it is unclear why aging causes widespread hearing impairment in the elderly. As molecular biological experiments have been conducted for research recently, ARHL is gradually established at various levels with the application and development of integrated multi-omics analysis in the studies of ARHL. Here, the recent progress in the application of multi-omics analysis in the molecular mechanisms of ARHL development and therapeutic regimens, including the combined analysis of different omics, such as transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome, to screen for risk sites, risk genes, and differences in lipid metabolism, etc., is outlined and the integrated histological data further promote the profound understanding of the disease process as well as physiological mechanisms of ARHL. The advantages and disadvantages of multi-omics analysis in disease research are also discussed and the authors speculate on the future prospects and applications of this part-to-whole approach, which may provide more comprehensive guidance for ARHL and aging disease prevention and treatment.

Navigating the Usher Syndrome Genetic Landscape: An Evaluation of the Associations between Specific Genes and Quality Categories of Cochlear Implant Outcomes

Usher syndrome (US) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder that involves three main features: sensorineural hearing loss, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and vestibular impairment. With a prevalence of 4-17/100,000, it is the most common cause of deaf-blindness worldwide. Genetic research has provided crucial insights into the complexity of US. Among nine confirmed causative genes, MYO7A and USH2A are major players in US types 1 and 2, respectively, whereas CRLN1 is the sole confirmed gene associated with type 3. Variants in these genes also contribute to isolated forms of hearing loss and RP, indicating intersecting molecular pathways. While hearing loss can be adequately managed with hearing aids or cochlear implants (CIs), approved RP treatment modalities are lacking. Gene replacement and editing, antisense oligonucleotides, and small-molecule drugs hold promise for halting RP progression and restoring vision, enhancing patients' quality of life. Massively parallel sequencing has identified gene variants (e.g., in PCDH15) that influence CI results. Accordingly, preoperative genetic examination appears valuable for predicting CI success. To explore genetic mutations in CI recipients and establish correlations between implant outcomes and involved genes, we comprehensively reviewed the literature to gather data covering a broad spectrum of CI outcomes across all known US-causative genes. Implant outcomes were categorized as excellent or very good, good, poor or fair, and very poor. Our review of 95 cochlear-implant patients with US, along with their CI outcomes, revealed the importance of presurgical genetic testing to elucidate potential challenges and provide tailored counseling to improve auditory outcomes. The multifaceted nature of US demands a comprehensive understanding and innovative interventions. Genetic insights drive therapeutic advancements, offering potential remedies for the retinal component of US. The synergy between genetics and therapeutics holds promise for individuals with US and may enhance their sensory experiences through customized interventions.

Co-Occurrence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Congenital Heart Disease: Etiologies and Management

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The co-occurrence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and congenital heart disease (CHD) is a rare condition with complex etiologies. The purpose of this study is to assess the etiologies, clinical features, and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) in this patient population.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series and literature review.

METHODS

Clinical data of children who were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD and received CIs at a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was performed to identify patients with SNHL and CHD.

FINDINGS

Of the 382 children who underwent cochlear implantation at our center, eight (2.1%) were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD. A literature review identified 1525 patients from 254 studies; the database therefore consisted of 1533 patients. The most common genetic etiologies of co-occurring SNHL and CHD were CHARGE syndrome (36.3%), Turner syndrome (8.4%), 22q11.2 deletion (3.0%), Noonan syndrome (2.9%), and Down syndrome (2.5%), whereas the most common non-genetic etiologies were congenital rubella syndrome (22.9%) and SNHL after early cardiac surgery (5.5%). Most of the patients presented with congenital, bilateral, severe-profound SNHL requiring early rehabilitation. Of the 126 children who received CIs at a median age of 2.5 years, half showed delayed speech development at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-occurring SNHL and CHD is a rare condition with complex etiologies. Timely hearing intervention with long-term follow-up and proper timing of heart surgery is essential for these children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4, case series Laryngoscope, 134:400-409, 2024.

Variability in Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in a Large German Cohort With a Genetic Etiology of Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

The variability in outcomes of cochlear implantation is largely unexplained, and clinical factors are not sufficient for predicting performance. Genetic factors have been suggested to impact outcomes, but the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of hereditary hearing loss makes it difficult to determine and interpret postoperative performance. It is hypothesized that genetic mutations that affect the neuronal components of the cochlea and auditory pathway, targeted by the cochlear implant (CI), may lead to poor performance. A large cohort of CI recipients was studied to verify this hypothesis.

DESIGN

This study included a large German cohort of CI recipients (n = 123 implanted ears; n = 76 probands) with a definitive genetic etiology of hearing loss according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines and documented postoperative audiological outcomes. All patients underwent preoperative clinical and audiological examinations. Postoperative CI outcome measures were based on at least 1 year of postoperative audiological follow-up for patients with postlingual hearing loss onset (>6 years) and 5 years for children with congenital or pre/perilingual hearing loss onset (≤6 years). Genetic analysis was performed based on three different methods that included single-gene screening, custom-designed hearing loss gene panel sequencing, targeting known syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss genes, and whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

The genetic diagnosis of the 76 probands in the genetic cohort involved 35 genes and 61 different clinically relevant (pathogenic, likely pathogenic) variants. With regard to implanted ears (n = 123), the six most frequently affected genes affecting nearly one-half of implanted ears were GJB2 (21%; n = 26), TMPRSS3 (7%; n = 9), MYO15A (7%; n = 8), SLC26A4 (5%; n = 6), and LOXHD1 and USH2A (each 4%; n = 5). CI recipients with pathogenic variants that influence the sensory nonneural structures performed at or above the median level of speech performance of all ears at 70% [monosyllable word recognition score in quiet at 65 decibels sound pressure level (SPL)]. When gene expression categories were compared to demographic and clinical categories (total number of compared categories: n = 30), mutations in genes expressed in the spiral ganglion emerged as a significant factor more negatively affecting cochlear implantation outcomes than all clinical parameters. An ANOVA of a reduced set of genetic and clinical categories (n = 10) identified five detrimental factors leading to poorer performance with highly significant effects ( p < 0.001), accounting for a total of 11.8% of the observed variance. The single strongest category was neural gene expression accounting for 3.1% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the relationship between the molecular genetic diagnoses of a hereditary etiology of hearing loss and cochlear implantation outcomes in a large German cohort of CI recipients revealed significant variabilities. Poor performance was observed with genetic mutations that affected the neural components of the cochlea, supporting the "spiral ganglion hypothesis."

Autosomal Dominant Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (DFNA): A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (HL) typically occurs when only one dominant allele within the disease gene is sufficient to express the phenotype. Therefore, most patients diagnosed with autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL have a hearing-impaired parent, although de novo mutations should be considered in all cases of negative family history. To date, more than 50 genes and 80 loci have been identified for autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. DFNA22 (MYO6 gene), DFNA8/12 (TECTA gene), DFNA20/26 (ACTG1 gene), DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene), DFNA15 (POU4F3 gene), DFNA2A (KCNQ4 gene), and DFNA10 (EYA4 gene) are some of the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. The characteristics of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL are heterogenous. However, in most cases, HL tends to be bilateral, post-lingual in onset (childhood to early adulthood), high-frequency (sloping audiometric configuration), progressive, and variable in severity (mild to profound degree). DFNA1 (DIAPH1 gene) and DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene) are the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL affecting low frequencies, while DFNA16 (unknown gene) is characterized by fluctuating HL. A long audiological follow-up is of paramount importance to identify hearing threshold deteriorations early and ensure prompt treatment with hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function

The cochlear implant (CI) is widely considered to be one of the most innovative and successful neuroprosthetic treatments developed to date. Although outcomes vary, CIs are able to effectively improve hearing in nearly all recipients and can substantially improve speech understanding and quality of life for patients with significant hearing loss. A wealth of research has focused on underlying factors that contribute to success with a CI, and recent evidence suggests that the overall health of the cochlea could potentially play a larger role than previously recognized. This article defines and reviews attributes of cochlear health and describes procedures to evaluate cochlear health in humans and animal models in order to examine the effects of cochlear health on performance with a CI. Lastly, we describe how future biologic approaches can be used to preserve and/or enhance cochlear health in order to maximize performance for individual CI recipients.

Comprehensive Prediction Model, Including Genetic Testing, for the Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

Despite growing interest in the genetic contribution to cochlear implant (CI) outcomes, only a few studies with limited samples have examined the association of CI outcomes with genetic etiologies. We analyzed CI outcomes using known predictors and genetic testing results to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of genetic etiologies.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images of patients who underwent cochlear implantation and genetic testing at a single tertiary medical institution, between May 2008 and December 2020. After excluding those whose speech test results were unavailable, and those in whom the implant was removed due to complications, such as infection or device failure, 203 patients were included in this study. The participants were categorized into adult (≥19 years), child (2-18 years), and infant (<24 months) groups. Outcomes were measured based on categories of auditory perception, monosyllable, disyllable, and sentence scores. For the infant group, the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale score was used.

RESULTS

Among the 203 participants, a causative genetic variant was identified in 117 (57.6%) individuals. The presence of a causative variant was significantly associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group (β = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.47; p = 0.044), but not in the child and adult groups. In the genetically confirmed patients without cochlear malformation, genetic variants involving the spiral ganglion was a poor prognostic factor in the child group (β = -57.24; 95% confidence interval, -90.63 to -23.75; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of known genetic etiology of hearing loss was associated with better CI outcomes in the infant group, but not in the child and adult groups. A neural-type genetic variant was a poor prognostic factor in the genetically diagnosed child subgroup without cochlear malformation. Careful genetic counseling should be performed before cochlear implantation.

The Effects of Cortical Reorganization and Applications of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Deaf People and Cochlear Implant Users

A cochlear implant (CI) is currently the only FDA-approved biomedical device that can restore hearing for the majority of patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). While prelingually and postlingually deaf individuals benefit substantially from CI, the outcomes after implantation vary greatly. Numerous studies have attempted to study the variables that affect CI outcomes, including the personal characteristics of CI candidates, environmental variables, and device-related variables. Up to 80% of the results remained unexplainable because all these variables could only roughly predict auditory performance with a CI. Brain structure/function differences after hearing deprivation, that is, cortical reorganization, has gradually attracted the attention of neuroscientists. The cross-modal reorganization in the auditory cortex following deafness is thought to be a key factor in the success of CI. In recent years, the adaptive and maladaptive effects of this reorganization on CI rehabilitation have been argued because the neural mechanisms of how this reorganization impacts CI learning and rehabilitation have not been revealed. Due to the lack of brain processes describing how this plasticity affects CI learning and rehabilitation, the adaptive and deleterious consequences of this reorganization on CI outcomes have recently been the subject of debate. This review describes the evidence for different roles of cross-modal reorganization in CI performance and attempts to explore the possible reasons. Additionally, understanding the core influencing mechanism requires taking into account the cortical changes from deafness to hearing restoration. However, methodological issues have restricted longitudinal research on cortical function in CI. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been increasingly used for the study of brain function and language assessment in CI because of its unique advantages, which are considered to have great potential. Here, we review studies on auditory cortex reorganization in deaf patients and CI recipients, and then we try to illustrate the feasibility of fNIRS as a neuroimaging tool in predicting and assessing speech performance in CI recipients. Here, we review research on the cross-modal reorganization of the auditory cortex in deaf patients and CI recipients and seek to demonstrate the viability of using fNIRS as a neuroimaging technique to predict and evaluate speech function in CI recipients.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder of Genetic and Non-Genetic Etiologies: A Multicenter Study

With diverse etiologies and clinical features, the management of pediatric auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is often challenging, and the outcomes of cochlear implants (CIs) are variable. This study aimed to investigate CI outcomes in pediatric patients with ANSD of different etiologies. Thirty-six children with ANSD who underwent cochlear implantation between 2001 and 2021 were included. Comprehensive etiological analyses were conducted, including a history review, next-generation sequencing-based genetic examinations, and imaging studies using high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Serial behavioral and speech audiometry were performed before and after surgery, and the outcomes with CI were evaluated using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores. By etiology, 18, 1, 1, and 10 patients had OTOF-related, WFS1-related, OPA1-related, and cochlear nerve deficiency (CND)-related ANSD, respectively. Six patients had no definite etiology. The average CI-aided behavioral threshold was 28.3 ± 7.8 dBHL, and those with CND-related ANSD were significantly worse than OTOF-related ANSD. The patients’ median CAP and SIR scores were 6 and 4, respectively. Favorable CI outcomes were observed in patients with certain etiologies of ANSD, particularly those with OTOF (CAP/SIR scores 5–7/2–5), WFS1 (CAP/SIR score 6/5), and OPA1 variants (CAP/SIR score 7/5). Patients with CND had suboptimal CI outcomes (CAP/SIR scores 2–6/1–3). Identifying the etiologies in ANSD patients is crucial before surgery and can aid in predicting prognoses.

Usher Syndrome

Usher syndrome (USH) is the most common genetic condition responsible for combined loss of hearing and vision. Balance disorders and bilateral vestibular areflexia are also observed in some cases. The syndrome was first described by Albrecht von Graefe in 1858, but later named by Charles Usher, who presented a large number of cases with hearing loss and retinopathy in 1914. USH has been grouped into three main clinical types: 1, 2, and 3, which are caused by mutations in different genes and are further divided into different subtypes. To date, nine causative genes have been identified and confirmed as responsible for the syndrome when mutated: MYO7A, USH1C, CDH23, PCDH15, and USH1G (SANS) for Usher type 1; USH2A, ADGRV1, and WHRN for Usher type 2; CLRN1 for Usher type 3. USH is inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern. Digenic, bi-allelic, and polygenic forms have also been reported, in addition to dominant or nonsyndromic forms of genetic mutations. This narrative review reports the causative forms, diagnosis, prognosis, epidemiology, rehabilitation, research, and new treatments of USH.

Genetic hearing loss: the audiologist's perspective

As knowledge regarding the genetic underpinnings of hearing loss has rapidly evolved, the role of the clinician in managing the patient has expanded beyond that of defining the characteristics of the auditory phenotype. The importance and impact of a genetic diagnosis has yet to be fully realized in routine clinical care. However, audiologists are uniquely situated to be front-line healthcare providers for persons of all ages with hereditary hearing loss. Here, we discuss why the combination of genotype and phenotype are necessary for the delivery of personalized and effective clinical care for individuals with genetic hearing loss.

New insights into Perrault syndrome, a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder

Hearing loss and impaired fertility are common human disorders each with multiple genetic causes. Sometimes deafness and impaired fertility, which are the hallmarks of Perrault syndrome, co-occur in a person. Perrault syndrome is inherited as an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by bilateral mild to severe childhood sensorineural hearing loss with variable age of onset in both sexes and ovarian dysfunction in females who have a 46, XX karyotype. Since the initial clinical description of Perrault syndrome 70 years ago, the phenotype of some subjects may additionally involve developmental delay, intellectual deficit and other neurological disabilities, which can vary in severity in part dependent upon the genetic variants and the gene involved. Here, we review the molecular genetics and clinical phenotype of Perrault syndrome and focus on supporting evidence for the eight genes (CLPP, ERAL1, GGPS1, HARS2, HSD17B4, LARS2, RMND1, TWNK) associated with Perrault syndrome. Variants of these eight genes only account for approximately half of the individuals with clinical features of Perrault syndrome where the molecular genetic base remains under investigation. Additional environmental etiologies and novel Perrault disease-associated genes remain to be identified to account for unresolved cases. We also report a new genetic variant of CLPP, computational structural insight about CLPP and single cell RNAseq data for eight reported Perrault syndrome genes suggesting a common cellular pathophysiology for this disorder. Some unanswered questions are raised to kindle future research about Perrault syndrome.