The Added Value of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Anomalous Fetuses With Detailed Prenatal Ultrasound and Postnatal Phenotype

Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing

Prenatal diagnoses of congenital malformations have increased significantly in recent years with use of high-resolution prenatal imaging. Despite more precise radiological diagnoses, discussions with expectant parents remain challenging because congenital malformations are associated with a wide spectrum of outcomes. Comprehensive prenatal genetic testing has become an essential tool that improves the accuracy of prognostication. Testing strategies include chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing, and genome sequencing. The diagnostic yield varies depending on the specific malformations, severity of the abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement. The utility of prenatal genetic diagnosis includes increased diagnostic clarity for clinicians and families, informed pregnancy decision-making, neonatal care planning, and reproductive planning. Turnaround time for results of comprehensive genetic testing remains a barrier, especially for parents that are decision-making, although this has improved over time. Uncertainty inherent to many genetic testing results is a challenge. Appropriate genetic counseling is essential for parents to understand the diagnosis and prognosis and to make informed decisions. Recent research has investigated the yield of exome or genome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses, both with non-invasive screening methods and invasive diagnostic testing; the prenatal diagnostic community must evaluate and analyze the significant ethical considerations associated with this practice prior to generalizing its use. IMPACT: Reviews available genetic testing options during the prenatal period in detail. Discusses the impact of prenatal genetic testing on care using case-based examples. Consolidates the current literature on the yield of genetic testing for prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations.

Exome sequencing in every pregnancy? Results of trio exome sequencing in structurally normal fetuses

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the detection rate of clinically significant results of prenatal exome sequencing (pES) in low-risk pregnancies and apparently normal fetuses in non-consanguineous couples.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of pES conducted at a single center from January 2020 to September 2023 was performed. Genetic counseling was provided, and detailed medical histories were obtained. High-risk pregnancies were excluded due to major ultrasound anomalies, sonographic soft markers, abnormal maternal biochemical screening, or family history suggestive of monogenic diseases as well as cases with pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) chromosomal microarray results. Exome analysis focused on ∼2100 genes associated with Mendelian genetic disorders. Variant analysis and classification followed the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines.

RESULTS

Among 1825 pES conducted, 1020 low-risk cases revealed 28 fetuses (2.7%) with potentially clinically significant variants indicating known monogenic diseases, primarily de novo dominant variants (64%). Among these 28 cases, 9 fetuses (0.9%) had the potential for severe phenotypes, including shortened lifespan and intellectual disability, and another 12 had the potential for milder phenotypes. Seven cases were reported with variants of uncertain significance (VUS) that, according to the ACMG criteria, leaned toward LP, constituting 0.7% of the entire cohort. Termination of pregnancy was elected in 13 out of 1020 cases (1.2%) in the cohort, including 7/9 in the severe phenotypes group, 2/12 in the milder phenotype group, and 4/7 in the VUS group.

CONCLUSION

The 2.7% detection rate highlights the significant contribution of pES in low-risk pregnancies. However, it necessitates rigorous analysis, and comprehensive genetic counseling before and after testing.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in prenatal agenesis of corpus callosum: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incremental diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) after negative chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in cases of prenatally diagnosed agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) and to identify the associated genes and variants.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published up until June 2022 using four databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. Studies in English reporting on the diagnostic yield of ES following negative CMA in prenatally diagnosed partial or complete ACC were included. Authors of cohort studies were contacted for individual participant data and extended cohorts were provided for two of them. The increase in diagnostic yield with ES for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants was assessed in all cases of ACC, isolated ACC, ACC with other cranial anomalies and ACC with extracranial anomalies. To identify all reported genetic variants, the systematic review included all ACC cases; however, for the meta-analysis, only studies with ≥ three ACC cases were included. Meta-analysis of proportions was employed using a random-effects model. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using modified Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies, encompassing 288 prenatally diagnosed ACC cases that underwent ES following negative CMA, met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. We classified 116 genetic variants in 83 genes associated with prenatal ACC with a full phenotypic description. There were 15 studies, encompassing 268 cases, that reported on ≥ three ACC cases and were included in the meta-analysis. Of all the included cases, 43% had a P/LP variant on ES. The highest yield was for ACC with extracranial anomalies (55% (95% CI, 35-73%)), followed by ACC with other cranial anomalies (43% (95% CI, 30-57%)) and isolated ACC (32% (95% CI, 18-51%)).

CONCLUSIONS

ES demonstrated an incremental diagnostic yield in cases of prenatally diagnosed ACC following negative CMA. While the greatest diagnostic yield was observed in ACC with extracranial anomalies and ACC with other central nervous system anomalies, ES should also be considered in cases of isolated ACC. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Towards solving the genetic diagnosis odyssey in Iranian patients with congenital anomalies

Understanding the underlying causes of congenital anomalies (CAs) can be a complex diagnostic journey. We aimed to assess the efficiency of exome sequencing (ES) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in patients with CAs among a population with a high fraction of consanguineous marriage. Depending on the patient's symptoms and family history, karyotype/Quantitative Fluorescence- Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF-PCR) (n = 84), CMA (n = 81), ES (n = 79) or combined CMA and ES (n = 24) were performed on 168 probands (66 prenatal and 102 postnatal) with CAs. Twelve (14.28%) probands were diagnosed by karyotype/QF-PCR and seven (8.64%) others were diagnosed by CMA. ES findings were conclusive in 39 (49.36%) families, and 61.90% of them were novel variants. Also, 64.28% of these variants were identified in genes that follow recessive inheritance in CAs. The diagnostic rate (DR) of ES was significantly higher than that of CMA in children from consanguineous families (P = 0·0001). The highest DR by CMA was obtained in the non-consanguineous postnatal subgroup and by ES in the consanguineous prenatal subgroup. In a population that is highly consanguineous, our results suggest that ES may have a higher diagnostic yield than CMA and should be considered as the first-tier test in the evaluation of patients with congenital anomalies.

Collaborative efforts to improve genetic testing in the neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To reduce unnecessary simultaneous karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

STUDY DESIGN

This quality improvement study investigated the effect of collaborative efforts between the NICU, cytogenetics, and clinical genetics on numbers of genetic tests, rates of abnormal tests, and number of genetics consults comparing baseline and 5-month intervention periods.

RESULTS

Simultaneous karyotype analyses and CMAs decreased due to a decrease in karyotype testing (11.3% [68/600] vs. 0.98% [6/614], p < 0.01). Karyotype analyses were more likely to be abnormal (13.8% [12/87] vs. 64.0% [16/25], p < 0.01). Frequency of genetics consultation did not change (7.0% [42/600] vs. 9.4% [58/614], p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Collaborative efforts between the NICU, cytogenetics, and clinical genetics decreased redundant genetic testing, which demonstrated potential cost savings to our institution. Ongoing collaborative efforts could facilitate genetic testing practices in the NICU that readily evolve in tandem with genetic testing recommendations.

Prenatal whole-exome sequencing for fetal structural anomalies: a retrospective analysis of 145 Chinese cases

BACKGROUND

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) significantly improves the diagnosis of the etiology of fetal structural anomalies. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of prenatal WES and to investigate the pathogenic variants in structurally abnormal fetuses.

METHODS

We recruited 144 fetuses with structural anomalies between 14 and 2020 and 15 December 2021 in the study. Genetic screening was performed by WES combined with karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis. The molecular diagnostic yield of prenatal WES for each type of fetal structural anomaly and the identified pathogenic genes and mutations were reported.

RESULTS

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and genetic data of 145 structurally anomalous fetuses. These cases were classified into 9 phenotypic classes based on antenatal ultrasound findings. Thirty-eight pathogenic variants in 24 genes were identified in 35 of the 145 cases, including 14 novel variants in 13 genes (EP300, MYH3, TSC2, MMP9, CPLANE1, INVS, COL1A1, EYA1, TTC21B, MKS1, COL11A2, PDHA1 and L1CAM). Five additional pathogenic variants were classified as incidental findings. Our study showed that the overall diagnosis rate of WES was 28.1% (27/96) in the parent-fetus trio cases and 16.3% (8/49) in the proband-only cases. Fetuses with musculoskeletal anomalies had the highest diagnostic yield (51.4%, 19/37). In addition, FGFR3 and COL1A1 were the most common pathogenic genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work expands the mutation spectrum of the genes associated with fetal structural anomalies and provides valuable information for future parental genetic counselling and pregnancy management of the structurally anomalous fetuses.

Analysis of retest reliability for pregnant women undergoing cfDNA testing with a no-call result

BACKGROUND

Determining the reasons for unreportable or no-call cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test results has been an ongoing issue, and a consensus on subsequent management is still lacking. This study aimed to explore potential factors related to no-call cfDNA test results and to discuss whether retest results are reliable.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective study of women with singleton pregnancies undergoing cfDNA testing in 2021. Of the 9871 pregnant patients undergoing cfDNA testing, 111 had a no-call result, and their results were compared to those of 170 control patients. The no-call rate was 1.12% (111/9871), and the primary cause for no-call results was data fluctuation (88.29%, 98/111). Medical conditions were significantly more frequent in the no-call group than in the reportable results group (P < 0.001). After retesting, 107 (107/111, 96.40%) patients had a result, and the false-positive rate (FPR) of retesting was 10.09% (10.09%, 11/109). In addition, placental lesions were more frequent in the no-call group than in the reportable results group (P = 0.037), and 4 patients, all in the no-call group, experienced pregnancy loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with medical conditions are more likely to have a no-call result. A retest is suggested for patients with a no-call result, but retests have a high FPR. In addition, pregnant women with a no-call result are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In conclusion, more attention should be given to pregnant women for whom a no-call cfDNA result is obtained.

The challenges in the interpretation of genetic variants detected by genomics techniques in patients with congenital anomalies

BACKGROUND

Despite the efforts that have been made to standardize the interpretation of variants, in some cases, their pathogenicity remains vague and confusing, and sometimes their interpretation does not help clinicians to establish clinical correlation using genetic test results. This study aims to shed more lights on these challenging variants.

METHODS

In a clinical setting, the variants found from 81 array CGH and 79 whole exome sequencing (WES) in patients with congenital anomalies were interpreted based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.

RESULTS

In this study, the interpretation of the disease-causing variants and the variants with uncertain clinical significance detected by WES was far more challenging than the variants detected by array CGH. The presence of unreported clinical symptoms, incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, parents' reluctance to analyze segregation in the family, and the limitations of prenatal tests, were among the challenging factors in the interpretation of variants in this study.

CONCLUSION

A careful study of the pedigree and disease mode of inheritance, as well as a careful clinical examination of the carrier parents in diseases with autosomal dominant inheritance, are among the primary strategies for determining the clinical significance of the variants. Continued efforts to mitigate these challenges are needed to improve the interpretation of variants.

Genetic analysis and prenatal diagnosis of short-rib thoracic dysplasia 3 with or without polydactyly caused by compound heterozygous variants of DYNC2H1 gene in four Chinese families

Background: To describe the genetic variation of dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1 (DYNC2H1) gene in four Chinese families affected with short-rib thoracic dysplasia 3 with or without polydactyly (SRTD3), and to provide evidence for accurate prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling.

Methods: The detailed clinical prenatal sonographic features of four fetuses with SRTD3 were carried out. Trio-whole exome sequencing (WES) and proband-WES sequencing was applied to filtrated causative variants in four families. The causative variants of each family were validated in by Sanger sequencing. Bioinformation analysis was applied to predict the harmfulness of these mutations and perform the protein-protein interaction network and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. A vitro minigene splicing assay was conducted to assess the influence of the splice site variant.

Results: Typical characterization of the four fetuses included short long bones, short ribs, narrow chest, hand and foot posture abnormalities, femur short in diameter and slightly bowing, cardiac abnormalities, and so on. Moreover, eight compound heterozygous variants of DYNC2H1 (NM_001080463.2): c.3842A&gt;C (p.Tyr1281Ser) and c.8833-1G&gt;A, c.8617A&gt;G (p.Met2873Val) and c.7053_7054del (p.Cys2351Ter), c.5984C&gt;T (p.Ala1995Val) and c.10219C&gt;T (p.Arg3407Ter), c.5256del (p.Ala1753GlnfsTer13) and c.9737C&gt;T (p.Thr3246Ile), were identified. Among which, c.10219C&gt;T (p.Arg3407Terp), c.5984C&gt;T (p.Ala1995Val) and c.9737C&gt;T (p.Thr3246Ile) were reported in ClinVar databases, and c.8617A&gt;G (p.Met2873Val), c.10219C&gt;T (p.Arg3407Ter), c.5984C&gt;T (p.Ala1995Val) were found in HGMD databases. Four variants (c.3842A&gt;C (p.Tyr1281Ser), c.8833-1G&gt;A, c.7053_7054del (p.Cys2351Ter) and c.5256del (p.Ala1753GlnfsTer13) were first reported as novel mutations. According to the ACMG guidelines, c.8617A&gt;G (p.Met2873Val), c.7053_7054del (p.Cys2351Ter), c.5984C&gt;T (p.Ala1995Val), c.10219C&gt;T (p.Arg3407Ter) and c.5256del (p.Ala1753GlnfsTer13) were rated as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, others variants were predicted to be variants of uncertain significance mutations. The minigene assay results indicated that c.8833-1G&gt;A caused the skipping over exon 56, resulting in exon 56 loss.

Conclusion: In our study, we analyzed the genetic mutations in four fetuses with SRTD3 by whole exome sequencing and identified pathogenic variants causing SRTD3. Our results expand the mutation spectrum of DYNC2H1 in SRTD3, which is helpful for the accurate prenatal diagnosis of SRTD3 fetuses and provide useful strategies for genetic counseling.

Whole-exome sequencing in deceased fetuses with ultrasound anomalies: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is an effective method in the prenatal setting for identification of the underlying genetic etiology of fetal ultrasound abnormalities. To investigate the diagnostic value of WES in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities that resulted in fetal demise or pregnancy termination.

METHODS

61 deceased fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities and normal copy number variation Sequencing were retrospectively collected. Proband-only or trio-WES were performed on the products of conception.

RESULT

Collectively, 28 cases were positive with 39 variants (10 pathogenic, 22 likely pathogenic and 7 variants of uncertain significance) of 18 genes, and the overall diagnostic rate was 45.9% (28/61), of which 39.2% (11/28) were de novo variants. In addition, 21 variants in 11 genes among the positive cases had not been previously reported. The diagnostic yield for definitive findings for trio analysis was 55.9% (19/34) compared to 33.3% (9/27) for singletons. The most common ultrasound abnormalities were skeletal system abnormalities 39.2% (11/28), followed by multiple system abnormalities (17.9%, 5/28) and genitourinary abnormalities (17.9%, 5/28).

CONCLUSION

Our results support the use of WES to identify genetic etiologies of ultrasound abnormalities and improve understanding of pathogenic variants. The identification of disease-related variants provided information for subsequent genetic counseling of recurrence risk and management of subsequent pregnancies.

Fetal phenotypes of Mendelian disorders: A descriptive study from India

OBJECTIVE

Exome sequencing(ES) based diagnosis of Mendelian diseases in the fetus is limited by paucity of phenotypic information. This study reports the comprehensive phenotypes of some fetuses with Mendelian disorders.

METHODS

Next generation technology based sequencing of all coding regions of the genome(Exome sequencing) or targeted gene sequencing using Sanger or next generation platforms was performed in a cohort of deeply phenotyped, cytogenetically normal fetuses with morphological defects. Prenatal ultrasonographic phenotypes and Postmortem details including dysmorphology, histopathology, radiography were ascertained. Novel candidate genes, novel/ unusual findings and unusual genotypes in cases with confirmed Mendelian disorders are described.

RESULTS

Of the 102 fetuses sequenced, 45 (44%) achieved definitive diagnosis of a Mendelian disorder with 50 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. The majority (87%) were autosomal recessive, 69% families were consanguineous and 54% variants were novel. Dysmorphic syndromes, skeletal dysplasias and metabolic disorders were the commonest disease categories, ciliopathies and dystroglycanopathies commonest molecular categories. We describe the first fetal description of six monogenic diseases, and nine cases with novel histological findings. Nineteen cases had novel/ unusual findings.

CONCLUSION

This cohort demonstrates how deep fetal phenotypes of some Mendelian disorders can show novel/unusual findings which have important implications for prenatal diagnosis of these conditions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Implementation of Exome Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis and Impact on Genetic Counseling: The Polish Experience

Background: Despite advances in routine prenatal cytogenetic testing, most anomalous fetuses remain without a genetic diagnosis. Exome sequencing (ES) is a molecular technique that identifies sequence variants across protein-coding regions and is now increasingly used in clinical practice. Fetal phenotypes differ from postnatal and, therefore, prenatal ES interpretation requires a large amount of data deriving from prenatal testing. The aim of our study was to present initial results of the implementation of ES to prenatal diagnosis in Polish patients and to discuss its possible clinical impact on genetic counseling. Methods: In this study we performed a retrospective review of all fetal samples referred to our laboratory for ES from cooperating centers between January 2017 and June 2021. Results: During the study period 122 fetuses were subjected to ES at our institution. There were 52 abnormal ES results: 31 in the group of fetuses with a single organ system anomaly and 21 in the group of fetuses with multisystem anomalies. The difference between groups was not statistically significant. There were 57 different pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants reported in 33 different genes. The most common were missense variants. In 17 cases the molecular diagnosis had an actual clinical impact on subsequent pregnancies or other family members. Conclusions: Exome sequencing increases the detection rate in fetuses with structural anomalies and improves genetic counseling for both the affected couple and their relatives.

Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Fetal malformations occur in 2-3% of pregnancies. They require invasive procedures for cytogenetics and molecular testing. "Structural anomalies" include non-transient anatomic alterations. "Soft markers" are often transient minor ultrasound findings. Anomalies not fitting these definitions are categorized as "dynamic". This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic yield and the rates of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) in fetuses undergoing molecular testing (chromosomal microarray (CMA), exome sequencing (ES), genome sequencing (WGS)) due to ultrasound findings. The CMA diagnostic yield was 2.15% in single soft markers (vs. 0.79% baseline risk), 3.44% in multiple soft markers, 3.66% in single structural anomalies and 8.57% in multiple structural anomalies. Rates for specific subcategories vary significantly. ES showed a diagnostic rate of 19.47%, reaching 27.47% in multiple structural anomalies. WGS data did not allow meta-analysis. In fetal structural anomalies, CMA is a first-tier test, but should be integrated with karyotype and parental segregations. In this class of fetuses, ES presents a very high incremental yield, with a significant VUSs burden, so we encourage its use in selected cases. Soft markers present heterogeneous CMA results from each other, some of them with risks comparable to structural anomalies, and would benefit from molecular analysis. The diagnostic rate of multiple soft markers poses a solid indication to CMA.

Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, where karyotype/chromosomal microarray (CMA) is normal.

Methods

Following electronic searches of four databases, we included studies with ≥10 structurally abnormal fetuses undergoing ES or whole genome sequencing. The incremental diagnostic yield of ES over CMA/karyotype was calculated and pooled in a meta‐analysis. Sub‐group analyses investigated effects of case selection and fetal phenotype on diagnostic yield.

Results

We identified 72 reports from 66 studies, representing 4350 fetuses. The pooled incremental yield of ES was 31% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26%–36%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield was significantly higher for cases pre‐selected for likelihood of monogenic aetiology compared to unselected cases (42% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001). Diagnostic yield differed significantly between phenotypic sub‐groups, ranging from 53% (95% CI 42%–63%, p < 0.0001) for isolated skeletal abnormalities, to 2% (95% CI 0%–5%, p = 0.04) for isolated increased nuchal translucency.

Conclusion

Prenatal ES provides a diagnosis in an additional 31% of structurally abnormal fetuses when CMA/karyotype is non‐diagnostic. The expected diagnostic yield depends on the body system(s) affected and can be optimised by pre‐selection of cases following multi‐disciplinary review to determine that a monogenic cause is likely.

What's already known about this topic?

Prenatal exome sequencing (ES) increases genetic diagnoses in fetuses with structural abnormalities and a normal karyotype and chromosomal microarray.

Published diagnostic yields from ES are varied and may be influenced by study size, case selection and fetal phenotype.

What does this study add?

This study provides a comprehensive systematic review of the literature to date and investigates the diagnostic yield of ES for a range of isolated system anomalies, to support clinical decision‐making on how to offer prenatal ES.