1
|
Wall BPG, Nguyen M, Harrell JC, Dozmorov MG. Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization. Methods Mol Biol 2025; 2856:357-400. [PMID: 39283464 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4136-1_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) chromatin interactions, such as enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs), loops, topologically associating domains (TADs), and A/B compartments, play critical roles in a wide range of cellular processes by regulating gene expression. Recent development of chromatin conformation capture technologies has enabled genome-wide profiling of various 3D structures, even with single cells. However, current catalogs of 3D structures remain incomplete and unreliable due to differences in technology, tools, and low data resolution. Machine learning methods have emerged as an alternative to obtain missing 3D interactions and/or improve resolution. Such methods frequently use genome annotation data (ChIP-seq, DNAse-seq, etc.), DNA sequencing information (k-mers and transcription factor binding site (TFBS) motifs), and other genomic properties to learn the associations between genomic features and chromatin interactions. In this review, we discuss computational tools for predicting three types of 3D interactions (EPIs, chromatin interactions, and TAD boundaries) and analyze their pros and cons. We also point out obstacles to the computational prediction of 3D interactions and suggest future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brydon P G Wall
- Center for Biological Data Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - My Nguyen
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - J Chuck Harrell
- Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Center for Pharmaceutical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Mikhail G Dozmorov
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
- Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Artemyev V, Gubaeva A, Paremskaia AI, Dzhioeva AA, Deviatkin A, Feoktistova SG, Mityaeva O, Volchkov PY. Synthetic Promoters in Gene Therapy: Design Approaches, Features and Applications. Cells 2024; 13:1963. [PMID: 39682712 DOI: 10.3390/cells13231963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Revised: 11/22/2024] [Accepted: 11/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Gene therapy is a promising approach to the treatment of various inherited diseases, but its development is complicated by a number of limitations of the natural promoters used. The currently used strong ubiquitous natural promoters do not allow for the specificity of expression, while natural tissue-specific promoters have lowactivity. These limitations of natural promoters can be addressed by creating new synthetic promoters that achieve high levels of tissue-specific target gene expression. This review discusses recent advances in the development of synthetic promoters that provide a more precise regulation of gene expression. Approaches to the design of synthetic promoters are reviewed, including manual design and bioinformatic methods using machine learning. Examples of successful applications of synthetic promoters in the therapy of hereditary diseases and cancer are presented, as well as prospects for their clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Artemyev
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, 125315 Moscow, Russia
- Moscow Center for Advanced Studies, Kulakova Str. 20, 123592 Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Gubaeva
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, 125315 Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasiia Iu Paremskaia
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, 125315 Moscow, Russia
| | - Amina A Dzhioeva
- Moscow Center for Advanced Studies, Kulakova Str. 20, 123592 Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrei Deviatkin
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, 125315 Moscow, Russia
| | - Sofya G Feoktistova
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, 125315 Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Mityaeva
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, 125315 Moscow, Russia
- Moscow Center for Advanced Studies, Kulakova Str. 20, 123592 Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Moscow State University, Lomonosovsky Pr., 27, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Pavel Yu Volchkov
- Federal Research Center for Innovator and Emerging Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Technologies, 125315 Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Moscow State University, Lomonosovsky Pr., 27, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Center N.A. A.S. Loginov, 111123 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wall BPG, Nguyen M, Harrell JC, Dozmorov MG. Machine and deep learning methods for predicting 3D genome organization. ARXIV 2024:arXiv:2403.03231v1. [PMID: 38495565 PMCID: PMC10942493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Three-Dimensional (3D) chromatin interactions, such as enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs), loops, Topologically Associating Domains (TADs), and A/B compartments play critical roles in a wide range of cellular processes by regulating gene expression. Recent development of chromatin conformation capture technologies has enabled genome-wide profiling of various 3D structures, even with single cells. However, current catalogs of 3D structures remain incomplete and unreliable due to differences in technology, tools, and low data resolution. Machine learning methods have emerged as an alternative to obtain missing 3D interactions and/or improve resolution. Such methods frequently use genome annotation data (ChIP-seq, DNAse-seq, etc.), DNA sequencing information (k-mers, Transcription Factor Binding Site (TFBS) motifs), and other genomic properties to learn the associations between genomic features and chromatin interactions. In this review, we discuss computational tools for predicting three types of 3D interactions (EPIs, chromatin interactions, TAD boundaries) and analyze their pros and cons. We also point out obstacles of computational prediction of 3D interactions and suggest future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brydon P. G. Wall
- Center for Biological Data Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA
| | - My Nguyen
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| | - J. Chuck Harrell
- Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA
- Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
- Center for Pharmaceutical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Mikhail G. Dozmorov
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
- Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Umarov R, Hon CC. Enhancer target prediction: state-of-the-art approaches and future prospects. Biochem Soc Trans 2023; 51:1975-1988. [PMID: 37830459 DOI: 10.1042/bst20230917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Enhancers are genomic regions that regulate gene transcription and are located far away from the transcription start sites of their target genes. Enhancers are highly enriched in disease-associated variants and thus deciphering the interactions between enhancers and genes is crucial to understanding the molecular basis of genetic predispositions to diseases. Experimental validations of enhancer targets can be laborious. Computational methods have thus emerged as a valuable alternative for studying enhancer-gene interactions. A variety of computational methods have been developed to predict enhancer targets by incorporating genomic features (e.g. conservation, distance, and sequence), epigenomic features (e.g. histone marks and chromatin contacts) and activity measurements (e.g. covariations of enhancer activity and gene expression). With the recent advances in genome perturbation and chromatin conformation capture technologies, data on experimentally validated enhancer targets are becoming available for supervised training of these methods and evaluation of their performance. In this review, we categorize enhancer target prediction methods based on their rationales and approaches. Then we discuss their merits and limitations and highlight the future directions for enhancer targets prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzan Umarov
- RIKEN Centre for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama RIKEN Institute, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Chung-Chau Hon
- RIKEN Centre for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama RIKEN Institute, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|