Thioreductase-Containing Epitopes Inhibit the Development of Type 1 Diabetes in the NOD Mouse Model

First-in-human, double-blind, randomized phase 1b study of peptide immunotherapy IMCY-0098 in new-onset type 1 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of immune biomarkers

BACKGROUND

IMCY-0098, a synthetic peptide developed to halt disease progression via elimination of key immune cells in the autoimmune cascade, has shown a promising safety profile for the treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in a recent phase 1b trial. This exploratory analysis of data from that trial aimed to identify the patient biomarkers at baseline associated with a positive response to treatment and examined the associations between immune response parameters and clinical efficacy endpoints (as surrogates for mechanism of action endpoints) using an artificial intelligence-based approach of unsupervised explainable machine learning.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory analysis of data from a phase 1b, dose-escalation, randomized, placebo-controlled study of IMCY-0098 in patients with recent-onset T1D. Here, a panel of markers of T cell activation, memory T cells, and effector T cell response were analyzed via descriptive statistics. Artificial intelligence-based analyses of associations between all variables, including immune responses and clinical responses, were performed using the Knowledge Extraction and Management (KEM®) v 3.6.2 analytical platform.

RESULTS

The relationship between all available patient data was investigated using unsupervised machine learning implemented in the KEM® environment. Of 15 associations found for the dose C group (450 μg subcutaneously followed by 3 × 225 μg subcutaneously), seven involved human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type, all of which identified improvement/absence of worsening of disease parameters in DR4+ patients and worsening/absence of improvement in DR4- patients. This association with DR4+ and non-DR3 was confirmed using the endpoints normalized area under the curve C-peptide from mixed meal tolerance tests where presence of DR4 HLA haplotype was associated with an improvement in both endpoints. Exploratory immune analysis showed that IMCY-0098 dose B (150 μg subcutaneously followed by 3 × 75 μg subcutaneously) and dose C led to an increase in presumed/potentially protective antigen-specific cytolytic CD4+ T cells and a decrease in pathogenic CD8+ T cells, consistent with the expected mechanism of action of IMCY-0098. The analysis identified significant associations between immune and clinical responses to IMCY-0098.

CONCLUSIONS

Promising preliminary efficacy results support the design of a phase 2 study of IMCY-0098 in patients with recent-onset T1D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03272269; EudraCT: 2016-003514-27.

Islet transplantation outcomes in type 1 diabetes and transplantation of HLA-DQ8/DR4: results of a single-centre retrospective cohort in Canada

Background

In solid organ transplantation, HLA matching between donor and recipient is associated with superior outcomes. In islet transplantation, an intervention for Type 1 diabetes, HLA matching between donor and recipient is not performed as part of allocation. Susceptibility to Type 1 diabetes is associated with the presence of certain HLA types. This study was conducted to determine the impact of these susceptibility antigens on islet allograft survival.

Methods

This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study. This cohort of transplant recipients (n = 268) received islets from 661 donor pancreases between March 11th, 1999 and August 29th, 2018 at the University of Alberta Hospital (Edmonton, AB, Canada). The frequency of the Type 1 diabetes susceptibility HLA antigens (HLA-A24, -B39, -DQ8, -DQ2 and-DQ2-DQA1∗05) in recipients and donors were determined. Recipient and donor HLA antigens were examined in relation to time to first C-peptide negative status/graft failure or last observation point. Taking into account multiple transplants per patient, we fitted a Gaussian frailty survival analysis model with baseline hazard function stratified by transplant number, adjusted for cumulative islet dose and other confounders.

Findings

Across all transplants recipients of donors positive for HLA-DQ8 had significantly better graft survival (adjusted HRs 0.33 95% CI 0.17-0.66; p = 0.002). At first transplant only, donors positive for HLA-DQ2-DQA1∗05 had inferior graft survival (adjusted HR 1.96 95% CI 1.10-3.46); p = 0.02), although this was not significant in the frailty analysis taking multiple transplants into account (adjusted HR 1.46 95% CI 0.77-2.78; p = 0.25). Other HLA antigens were not associated with graft survival after adjustment for confounders.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest islet transplantation from HLA-DQ8 donors is associated with superior graft outcomes. A donor positive for HLA-DQ2-DQA1∗05 at first transplant was associated with inferior graft survival but not when taking into account multiple transplants per recipient. The relevance of HLA-antigens on organ allocation needs further evaluation and inclusion in islet transplant registries and additional observational and interventional studies to evaluate the role of HLA-DQ8 in islet graft survival are required.

Funding

None.

Epitope-based precision immunotherapy of Type 1 diabetes

Antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASITs) address important clinical needs in treating autoimmune diseases. However, Type 1 diabetes is a heterogeneous disease wherein patient characteristics influence responsiveness to ASITs. Targeting not only disease-relevant T cell populations, but also specific groups of patients using precision medicine is a new goal toward achieving effective treatment. HLA-restricted peptides provide advantages over protein as antigens, however, methods for profiling antigen-specific T cells need to improve in sensitivity, depth, and throughput to facilitate epitope selection. Delivery approaches are highly diverse, illustrating the many ways relevant antigen-presenting cell populations and anatomical locations can be targeted for tolerance induction. The role of persistence of antigen presentation in promoting durable antigen-specific tolerance requires further investigation. Based on the outcome of ASIT trials, the field is moving toward using patient-specific variations to improve efficacy, but challenges still lie on the path to delivering more effective and safer treatment to the T1D patient population.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus: Inflammation, mitophagy, and mitochondrial function

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease characterized by the damage of insulin-secreting β-cells in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans. To date, its etiology is not fully understood, despite decades of active search for root causes, and that underlines the complexity of the disease pathogenesis. It was found that mitophagy plays a regulatory role in the development of autoimmune response during T1DM pathogenesis by preventing the accumulation of defective/dysfunctional mitochondria in pancreatic cells. Mitochondrial dysfunction due to impaired mitophagy with the release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) contributes to initiating an inflammatory response by elevating pro-inflammatory cytokines and interacting with receptors like those involved in the pathogen-associated response. Moreover, mtROS and mtDNA activate pathways leading to the development of chronic inflammation, which is tightly implicated in T1DM autoimmunity. In this review, we summarized the evidence highlighting the functional role of mitophagy and mitochondria in the development of immune response and chronic inflammation during T1DM pathogenesis. Several anti-inflammatory and mitophagy-related treatment options have been explored.

First-in-human, double-blind, randomized phase 1b study of peptide immunotherapy IMCY-0098 in new-onset type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a CD4⁺ T cell-driven autoimmune disease characterized by the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells by CD8⁺ T cells. Achieving glycemic targets in T1D remains challenging in clinical practice; new treatments aim to halt autoimmunity and prolong β-cell survival. IMCY-0098 is a peptide derived from human proinsulin that contains a thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase motif at the N-terminus and was developed to halt disease progression by promoting the specific elimination of pathogenic T cells.

METHODS

This first-in-human, 24-week, double-blind phase 1b study evaluated the safety of three dosages of IMCY-0098 in adults diagnosed with T1D < 6 months before study start. Forty-one participants were randomized to receive four bi-weekly injections of placebo or increasing doses of IMCY-0098 (dose groups A/B/C received 50/150/450 μg for priming followed by three further administrations of 25/75/225 μg, respectively). Multiple T1D-related clinical parameters were also assessed to monitor disease progression and inform future development. Long-term follow-up to 48 weeks was also conducted in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Treatment with IMCY-0098 was well tolerated with no systemic reactions; a total of 315 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 40 patients (97.6%) and were related to study treatment in 29 patients (68.3%). AEs were generally mild; no AE led to discontinuation of the study or death. No significant decline in C-peptide was noted from baseline to Week 24 for dose A, B, C, or placebo (mean change - 0.108, - 0.041, - 0.040, and - 0.012, respectively), suggesting no disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Promising safety profile and preliminary clinical response data support the design of a phase 2 study of IMCY-0098 in patients with recent-onset T1D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IMCY-T1D-001: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03272269; EudraCT: 2016-003514-27; and IMCY-T1D-002: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04190693; EudraCT: 2018-003728-35.

Antigen-specific immunotherapy to restore antigen-specific tolerance in Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease

Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease are chronic autoimmune conditions, characterized by a dysregulated immune response. In Type 1 diabetes, there is beta cell destruction and subsequent insulin deficiency whereas in Graves' disease, there is unregulated excessive thyroid hormone production. Both diseases result in significant psychosocial, physiological, and emotional burden. There are associated risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes and risks of thyrotoxicosis and orbitopathy in Graves' disease. Advances in the understanding of the immunopathogenesis and response to immunotherapy in Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease have facilitated the introduction of targeted therapies to induce self-tolerance, and subsequently, the potential to induce long-term remission if effective. We explore current research surrounding the use of antigen-specific immunotherapies, with a focus on human studies, in Type 1 diabetes and Graves' disease including protein-based, peptide-based, dendritic-cell-based, and nanoparticle-based immunotherapies, including discussion of factors to be considered when translating immunotherapies to clinical practice.

A century later, still fighting back: antigen-specific immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic metabolic disease caused by the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing β-cells. Ever since the 1920s, the fate of patients suffering from T1D was dramatically improved owing to the isolation and production of insulin, and the scientific field has largely progressed as a result of the evidence gathered about its underpinnings and mechanisms. The last years have seen this knowledge transformed into actual antigen-specific immunotherapies with potential to restore selectively the breach of tolerance to β-cell autoantigens and halt the autoimmune aggression. However, so far, the results of both prevention and reversion trials in T1D have been rather discouraging, so there is still an urgent need to optimize those immunotherapies and their associated factors, for example, posology and administration patterns, route and timing. In this review, we look back on what has been achieved in the last century and identify the main autoantigens driving the autoimmune attack in T1D. Then, we take a deep dive into the numerous antigen-specific immunotherapies trialed and the ones still at a preclinical phase, ranging from peptides, proteins and agent combinations to gene transfer, nanoparticles, cell-based strategies and novel approaches exploiting naturally occurring tolerogenic processes. Finally, we provide insight into the several features to be considered in a T1D clinical trial, the ideal time point for intervention and the biomarkers needed for monitoring the successful regulatory effect of the antigen-specific immunotherapy. Although further research and optimization remain imperative, the development of a therapeutic armamentarium against T1D autoimmunity is certainly advancing with a confident step.

Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy for Treatment of Autoimmune Liver Diseases

The liver is a critical organ in controlling immune tolerance. In particular, it is now clear that targeting antigens for presentation by antigen presenting cells in the liver can induce immune tolerance to either autoantigens from the liver itself or tissues outside of the liver. Here we review immune mechanisms active within the liver that contribute both to the control of infectious diseases and tolerance to self-antigens. Despite its extraordinary capacity for tolerance induction, the liver remains a target organ for autoimmune diseases. In this review, we compare and contrast known autoimmune diseases of the liver. Currently patients tend to receive strong immunosuppressive treatments and, in many cases, these treatments are associated with deleterious side effects, including a significantly higher risk of infection and associated health complications. We propose that, in future, antigen-specific immunotherapies are adopted for treatment of liver autoimmune diseases in order to avoid such adverse effects. We describe various therapeutic approaches that either are in or close to the clinic, highlight their mechanism of action and assess their suitability for treatment of autoimmune liver diseases.

Antigen-specific therapeutic approaches for autoimmunity

The main function of the immune system in health is to protect the host from infection by microbes and parasites. Because immune responses to nonself bear the risk of unleashing accidental immunity against self, evolution has endowed the immune system with central and peripheral mechanisms of tolerance, including regulatory T and B cells. Although the past two decades have witnessed the successful clinical translation of a whole host of novel therapies for the treatment of chronic inflammation, the development of antigen-based approaches capable of selectively blunting autoimmune inflammation without impairing normal immunity has remained elusive. Earlier autoantigen-specific approaches employing peptides or whole antigens have evolved into strategies that seek to preferentially deliver these molecules to autoreactive T cells either indirectly, via antigen-presenting cells, or directly, via major histocompatibility complex molecules, in ways intended to promote clonal deletion and/or immunoregulation. The disease specificity, mechanistic underpinnings, developability and translational potential of many of these strategies remain unclear.

Peptide Immunotherapy for Type 1 Diabetes-Clinical Advances

Autoimmune and allergic diseases occur when an individual mounts an inappropriate immune response to a self-antigen or an innocuous environmental antigen. This triggers a pathogenic T-cell response resulting in damage to specific tissues and organs. In type 1 diabetes (T1D), this manifests as destruction of the insulin-secreting β cells, resulting in a life-long dependency on recombinant insulin. Modulation of the pathogenic T-cell response with antigen-specific peptide immunotherapy offers the potential to restore the immune homeostasis and prevent further tissue destruction. Recent clinical advances with peptide therapy approaches in both T1D and other diseases are beginning to show encouraging results. New technologies targeting the peptides to specific cell types are also moving from pre-clinical development to the clinic. While many challenges remain in clinical development, not least selection of the optimal dose and dosing frequency, this is clearly becoming a very active field of drug development.