Mechanisms Underlying Potential Therapeutic Approaches for COVID-19

Liver dysfunction and clinical outcomes of unvaccinated COVID-19 patients with and without chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Liver dysfunction is common during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while its clinical impact and association with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remain uncertain. We aimed to investigate liver dysfunction in COVID-19 patients and its impacts on those with/without CHB.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients at National Taiwan University Hospital, stratified according to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) serostatus, with demographics, laboratory data, and hospitalization course reviewed, and clinical outcomes compared through multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

We enrolled 109 COVID-19 patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 by August 2021. The HBsAg-positive group (n = 34) had significantly higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (26 vs. 16 U/L, P = 0.034), platelet (224 vs. 183 k/μL, P = 0.010) and longer hospitalizations (17 vs. 13 days, P = 0.012) compared with HBsAg-negative group (n = 75), while percentages of hepatitis (2-fold ALT elevation), oxygen supplementation, ventilators usage, COVID-specific treatment, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality were comparable. Older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.08, P = 0.032) and higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (OR: 1.08, 95 % CI: 1.004-1.16, P = 0.038) were associated with oxygen supplementation according to multivariable analyses. Higher AST predicted ICU admission (OR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.19, P = 0.008). Oxygen usage (OR: 5.64, 95 % CI: 1.67-19.09, P = 0.005) and shock (OR: 5.12, 95 % CI: 1.14-22.91, P = 0.033) were associated with liver dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

CHB patients had higher ALT levels and longer hospitalizations during COVID-19. Higher AST levels predict severe COVID-19 and ICU admission.

GDF15 : A modulator of immunity and a predictive biomarker of cardiovascular events : A strategy in COVID-19

In the recently published manuscript entitled "GDF15 a rising modulator of immunity and a strategy in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in relationship with iron metabolism" and we examined the potential properties of Growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) as an emerging modulator of immunity in COVID-19. We commented new aspects of the biology of GDF15 and investigated the potential value of GDF15 as a biomarker. Is GDF15 a biomarker of the inflammatory process and oxidative stress state? Recently, it was reported that 1500 clinical trials related to COVID-19 have been registered, but none have yet found an optimal strategy. In these conditions, more clinical studies are needed before any of these agents can be considered antiviral agents.

First-in-Human Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of a Rapidly Developed SARS-CoV-2 Therapeutic Antibody, AOD01, in Healthy Adults

Introduction

AOD01 is a novel, fully human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 neutralizing monoclonal antibody that was developed as a therapeutic against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This first-in-human study assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of AOD01 in healthy volunteers.

Methods

Intravenous doses of AOD01 were evaluated in escalating cohorts [four single-dose cohorts (2, 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) and one two-dose cohort (two doses of 20 mg/kg, 24 h apart)].

Results

Twenty-three subjects were randomized to receive AOD01 or a placebo in blinded fashion. A total of 34 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported; all were mild in severity. Related events (headache and diarrhea) were reported in one subject each. No event of infusion reactions, serious adverse event (SAE), or discontinuation due to AE were reported. The changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiograms were minimal. Dose-related exposure was seen from doses 2 to 20 mg/kg as confirmed by C_max and AUC_0–tlast. The median T_max was 1.5–3 h. Clearance was dose independent. Study results revealed long half-lives (163–465 h). Antidrug antibodies (ADA) to AOD01 were not detected among subjects, except in one subject of the two-dose cohort on day 92. Sustained ex vivo neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 was recorded until day 29 with single doses from 2 to 20 mg/kg and until day 43 with two doses of 20 mg/kg.

Conclusions

AOD01 was safe and well tolerated, demonstrated dose-related PK, non-immunogenic status, and sustained ex vivo neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 after single intravenous dose ranging from 2 to 20 mg/kg and two doses of 20 mg/kg and show good potential for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

(Health Sciences Authority identifier number CTA2000119).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00681-1.

Mechanisms of COVID-19 Pathogenesis in Diabetes

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, is a global pandemic impacting 254 million people in 190 countries. Comorbidities, particularly cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and hypertension, increase the risk of infection and poor outcomes. SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells through the angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor, generating inflammation and cytokine storm, often resulting in multiorgan failure. The mechanisms and effects of COVID-19 on patients with high-risk diabetes are not yet completely understood. In this review, we discuss the variety of coronaviruses, structure of SARS-CoV-2, mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, receptors associated with viral host entry, and disease progression. Furthermore, we focus on possible mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 in diabetes, leading to inflammation and heart failure. Finally, we discuss existing therapeutic approaches, unanswered questions, and future directions.

Therapeutic approaches for SARS-CoV-2 infection

Therapeutic approaches to COVID-19 treatment require appropriate inhibitors to target crucial proteins of SARS-CoV-2 replication machinery. It's been approximately 12 months since the pandemic started, yet no known specific drugs are available. However, research progresses with time in terms of high throughput virtual screening (HTVS) and rational design of repurposed, novel synthetic and natural products discovery by understanding the viral life cycle, immuno-pathological and clinical outcomes in patients based on host's nutritional, metabolic, and lifestyle status. Further, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches have also improved resiliency and immune responses. In this article, we summarize all the therapeutic antiviral strategies for COVID-19 drug discovery including computer aided virtual screening, repurposed drugs, immunomodulators, vaccines, plasma therapy, various adjunct therapies, and phage technology to unravel insightful mechanistic pathways of targeting SARS-CoV-2 and host's intrinsic, innate immunity at multiple checkpoints that aid in the containment of the disease.

An overview of SARS-COV-2-related hepatic injury

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative pathogen of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is highly contagious and has a variety of clinical manifestations, including liver injury. There have been a few reports indicating acute-on chronic liver failure among COVID-19 patients, however, patients with COVID-19-related liver injury are generally asymptomatic and present with a mild to moderate elevation in serum hepatic enzymes. Severe COVID-19 patients have high rates of liver injury with poorer outcomes. The pattern of abnormalities in liver biochemical indicators may be hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed. Although the pathogenesis of hepatic injury is not yet completely understood, causes of liver damage include systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ischemia-reperfusion injury, side effects of medications, and underlying chronic liver disease. While viral RNA has been detected in hepatocytes, it remains unknown if the coronavirus has the capacity to cause cytopathic effects in hepatic tissue. Additionally, it is important to remember that the current upheaval to daily life and access to healthcare caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant and negative effect on other patients with chronic liver disease. The objective of this review was to summarize the current literature on COVID-19-related hepatic injury with an examination of clinical features, potential pathogenesis, and histopathological findings of this entity.

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and immunogenicity of MW33: a Phase 1 clinical study of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-targeting monoclonal antibody

MW33 is a fully humanized IgG1κ monoclonal neutralizing antibody, and may be used for the prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, dose-escalation Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of MW33. Healthy adults aged 18–45 years were sequentially enrolled into the 4, 10, 20, 40, and 60 mg/kg dose groups and infused with MW33 over 60 ± 15 min and followed for 85 days. All 42 enrolled participants completed the MW33 infusion, and 40 participants completed the 85-day follow-up period. 34 participants received a single infusion of 4 (n = 2), 10 (n = 8), 20 (n = 8), 40 (n = 8), and 60 mg/kg (n = 8) of MW33. 27 subjects in the test groups experienced 78 adverse events (AEs) post-dose, with an incidence of 79.4% (27/34). The most common AEs included abnormal laboratory test results, vascular and lymphatic disorders, and infectious diseases. The severity of AEs was mainly Grade 1 (92 AEs), and three Grade 2 and one Grade 4. The main PK parameters, maximum concentration (C_max), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_0–t, and AUC_0–∞) in 34 subjects showed a linear kinetic relationship in the range of 10–60 mg/kg. The plasma half-life was approximately 25 days. The positive rates of serum ADAs and antibody titres were low with no evidence of an impact on safety or PK. In conclusion, MW33 was well-tolerated, demonstrated linear PK, with a lower positive rate of serum ADAs and antibody titres in healthy subjects.

Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04427501.

Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04533048.

Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04627584.

Liver Disease and Coronavirus Disease 2019: From Pathogenesis to Clinical Care

Infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus that emerged in late 2019, is posing an unprecedented challenge to global health. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the clinical disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, has a variable presentation ranging from asymptomatic infection to life-threatening acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan failure. Liver involvement is common during COVID-19 and exhibits a spectrum of clinical manifestations from asymptomatic elevations of liver function tests to hepatic decompensation. The presence of abnormal liver tests has been associated with a more severe presentation of COVID-19 disease and overall mortality. Although SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been detected in the liver of patients with COVID-19, it remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 productively infects and replicates in liver cells and has a direct liver-pathogenic effect. The cause of liver injury in COVID-19 can be attributed to multiple factors, including virus-induced systemic inflammation, hypoxia, hepatic congestion, and drug-induced liver disease. Among patients with cirrhosis, COVID-19 has been associated with hepatic decompensation and liver-related mortality. Additionally, COVID-19's impact on health care resources can adversely affect delivery of care and outcomes of patients with chronic liver disease. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of liver injury during COVID-19 will be important in the management of patients with COVID-19, especially those with advanced liver disease. This review summarizes our current knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 virus-host interactions in the liver as well the clinical impact of liver disease in COVID-19.

Drug repurposing against SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain using ensemble-based virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused worldwide pandemic and is responsible for millions of worldwide deaths due to -a respiratory disease known as COVID-19. In the search for a cure of COVID-19, drug repurposing is a fast and cost-effective approach to identify anti-COVID-19 drugs from existing drugs. The receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been a main target for drug designs to block spike protein binding to ACE2 proteins. In this study, we probed the conformational plasticity of the RBD using long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, from which, representative conformations were identified using clustering analysis. Three simulated conformations and the original crystal structure were used to screen FDA approved drugs (2466 drugs) against the predicted binding site at the ACE2-RBD interface, leading to 18 drugs with top docking scores. Notably, 16 out of the 18 drugs were obtained from the simulated conformations, while the crystal structure suggests poor binding. The binding stability of the 18 drugs were further investigated using MD simulations. Encouragingly, 6 drugs exhibited stable binding with RBD at the ACE2-RBD interface and 3 of them (gonadorelin, fondaparinux and atorvastatin) showed significantly enhanced binding after the MD simulations. Our study shows that flexibility modeling of SARS-CoV-2 RBD using MD simulation is of great help in identifying novel agents which might block the interaction between human ACE2 and the SARS-CoV-2 RBD for inhibiting the virus infection.

Genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 reveals local viral evolution in Ghana

The confirmed case fatality rate for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Ghana has dropped from a peak of 2% in March to be consistently below 1% since May 2020. Globally, case fatality rates have been linked to the strains/clades of circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within a specific country. Here we present 46 whole genomes of SARS-CoV-2 circulating in Ghana, from two separate sequencing batches: 15 isolates from the early epidemic (March 12-April 1 2020) and 31 from later time-points ( 25-27 May 2020). Sequencing was carried out on an Illumina MiSeq system following an amplicon-based enrichment for SARS-CoV-2 cDNA. After genome assembly and quality control processes, phylogenetic analysis showed that the first batch of 15 genomes clustered into five clades: 19A, 19B, 20A, 20B, and 20C, whereas the second batch of 31 genomes clustered to only three clades 19B, 20A, and 20B. The imported cases (6/46) mapped to circulating viruses in their countries of origin, namely, India, Hungary, Norway, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. All genomes mapped to the original Wuhan strain with high similarity (99.5-99.8%). All imported strains mapped to the European superclade A, whereas 5/9 locally infected individuals harbored the B4 clade, from the East Asian superclade B. Ghana appears to have 19B and 20B as the two largest circulating clades based on our sequence analyses. In line with global reports, the D614G linked viruses seem to be predominating. Comparison of Ghanaian SARS-CoV-2 genomes with global genomes indicates that Ghanaian strains have not diverged significantly from circulating strains commonly imported into Africa. The low level of diversity in our genomes may indicate lower levels of transmission, even for D614G viruses, which is consistent with the relatively low levels of infection reported in Ghana.

Evidence-based management of COVID-19 in cancer patients: Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO)

Since its first detection in China in late 2019 the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated infectious disease COVID-19 continue to have a major impact on global healthcare and clinical practice. Cancer patients, in particular those with haematological malignancies, seem to be at an increased risk for a severe course of infection. Deliberations to avoid or defer potentially immunosuppressive therapies in these patients need to be balanced against the overarching goal of providing optimal antineoplastic treatment. This poses a unique challenge to treating physicians. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding prevention, diagnostics and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 as well as strategies towards safe antineoplastic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO) by critically reviewing the currently available data on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in cancer patients applying evidence-based medicine criteria.