De Novo Donor Specific Antibody and Long-Term Outcome After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Immunology demystified: A guide for transplant hepatologists

Liver transplantation has become standard practice for treating end-stage liver disease. The success of the procedure relies on effective immunosuppressive medications to control the host's immune response. Despite the liver's inherent capacity to foster tolerance, the early post-transplant period is marked by significant immune reactivity. To ensure favorable outcomes, it is imperative to identify and manage various rejection types, encompassing T-cell-mediated, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejection. However, the approach to prescribing immunosuppressants relies heavily on clinical judgment rather than evidence-based criteria. Given that the majority of patients will require lifelong immuno suppression as the mechanisms underlying operational tolerance are still being investigated, healthcare providers must possess an understanding of immune responses, rejection mechanisms, and the pathways targeted by immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge enables customization of treatments and improved patient care, even though a consensus on an optimal immunosuppressive regimen remains elusive.

Noninvasive graft monitoring using donor-derived cell-free DNA in Japanese liver transplantation

AIM

To evaluate the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in diagnosing graft injuries in Japanese liver transplantation (LTx), including family-related living donors.

METHODS

A total of 321 samples from 10 newly operated LTx recipients were collected to monitor the early dynamics of dd-cfDNA levels after LTx. Fifty-five samples from 55 recipients were collected during protocol biopsies (PB), whereas 36 samples from 27 recipients were collected during event biopsies, consisting of 11 biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR), 20 acute dysfunctions without rejection (ADWR), and 5 chronic rejections. The levels of dd-cfDNA were quantified using a next-generation sequencer based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.

RESULTS

The dd-cfDNA levels were elevated significantly after LTx, followed by a rapid decline to the baseline in patients without graft injury within 30 days post-LTx. The dd-cfDNA levels were significantly higher in the 11 samples obtained during AR than those obtained during PB (p < 0.0001), which decreased promptly after treatment. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis of diagnostic ability yielded areas under the curve of 0.975 and 0.897 for AR (rejection activity index [RAI] ≥3) versus PB and versus non-AR (ADWR + PB). The dd-cfDNA levels during AR were elevated earlier and correlated more strongly with the RAI (r = 0.740) than aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase. The dd-cfDNA levels were neither associated with graft fibrosis based on histology nor the status of donor-specific antibodies in PB samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-derived cell-free DNA serves as a sensitive biomarker for detecting graft injuries in LTx. Further large-scale cohort studies are warranted to optimize its use in differentiating various post-LTx etiologies.

HLA matching between donors and recipients improves clinical liver transplant graft survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The importance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching between liver transplant donors and recipients on graft survival remains unclear and is not a clinical consideration in liver transplantation. This study aimed to determine the relationship between HLA matching and liver graft survival using a large-scale multi-centre database (UNOS/OPTN) and multivariate logistic analysis. The secondary aim was to determine whether this relationship was influenced by transplant indication and donor status.

METHODS

This retrospective observational analysis was performed using 22 702 liver transplant recipients from the UNOS/OPTN database. Patients were divided into two groups based on number of HLA mismatches (0-3 mismatches vs. 4-6 mismatches) and then subcategorized by indication and donor status. Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed by multivariate Cox analysis adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics and visualized using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

Allograft survival and risk of acute rejection were associated with degree of HLA mismatch. This association between HLA mismatch and graft survival persisted in individuals who underwent transplant for hepatitis, metabolic, drug toxicity, and congenital indications. Donor status also influenced the relationship between HLA mismatch and graft survival. Graft survival in DBD recipients was longer than in DCD in the 4-6 HLA mismatch group, whereas no significant difference was found in the 0-3 HLA mismatch group.

CONCLUSION

HLA mismatch significantly reduced graft survival and increased risk of acute rejection. This association was noted only in specific indications. These findings are of potential clinical relevance to organ allocation, allograft matching algorithms, immunosuppression protocols, and transplant surveillance.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

Basic Understanding of Liver Transplant Immunology

The liver is a specialized organ and plays an important role in our immune system. The liver constitutes parenchymal cells which are hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (60-80%) and non-parenchymal cells like liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), hepatic satellite/Ito cells, Kupffer cells, neutrophils, mononuclear cells, T and B lymphocytes (conventional and non-conventional), natural killer cells, and natural killer T (NKT) cells. The liver mounts a rapid and strong immune response, under unfavorable conditions and acts as an immune tolerance to a variety of non-pathogenic antigens. This delicate and dynamic interaction between different kinds of immune cells in the liver maintains a balance between immune screening and immune tolerance. The liver allografts are privileged immunologically; however, allograft rejection is not uncommon and is classified as cell or antibody-mediated. Advancements in transplant immunology help in the prevention of allografts rejection by immune reactions of the host thus leading to better graft and host survival. Fewer patients may not require immunosuppression due to systemic donor-specific T-cell tolerance. The liver tolerance mechanism is poorly studied, and LSEC and unconventional lymphocytes play an important role that dampens T cell response either by inducing apoptosis of cells or inhibiting co-stimulatory pathways. Newer cell-based therapy based on Treg, dendritic cells, and mesenchymal stromal cells will probably change the future of immunosuppression. Various invasive and non-invasive biomarkers and artificial intelligence have also been investigated to predict graft survival, post-transplant complications, and immunotolerance in the future.

Lowering maintenance immune suppression in elderly kidney transplant recipients; connecting the immunological and clinical dots

The management of long-term immune suppressive medication in kidney transplant recipients is a poorly explored field in the area of transplant medicine. In particular, older recipients are at an increased risk for side effects and have an exponentially increased risk of infection-related death. In contrast, an aged immune system decreases the risk of acute T-cell-mediated rejection in older recipients. Recent advances in alloimmunity research have shown a rapid and substantial decline in polyfunctional, high-risk CD4⁺ T cells post-transplantation. This lowers the direct alloreactivity responsible for T-cell-mediated rejection, also known as donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (c-aABMR) is the most frequent cause of kidney graft loss in the long term. However, in older adults, c-aABMR as a cause of graft loss is outnumbered by death with a functioning graft. In addition, DSA development and a diagnosis of c-aABMR plateau ~10 years after transplantation, resulting in a very low risk for rejection thereafter. The intensity of immune suppression regimes could likely be reduced accordingly, but trials in this area are scarce. Tacrolimus monotherapy for 1 year after transplantation seems feasible in older kidney transplant recipients with standard immunological risk, showing the expected benefits of fewer infections and better vaccination responses.

Regular protocol liver biopsy is useful to adjust immunosuppressant dose after adult liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Adjusting immunosuppression to minimal levels post-adult liver transplantation (LT) is critical; however, graft rejection has been reported in LT recipients with normal liver function evaluated by liver biopsy (LBx). Continual protocol liver biopsy (PLB) is performed regularly in LT recipients with normal liver function in some centers; however, its usefulness remains inadequately evaluated. This study aimed to assess retrospectively the usefulness of late PLB after adult LT.

METHODS

LBx evaluations of LT recipients with normal liver function and hepatitis B and C virus seronegativity were defined as PLB. The cases requiring immunosuppressive therapy for rejection findings based on Banff criteria were extracted from the PLBs, and pathological data collected before and after immunosuppressive dosage adjustment (based on modified histological activity index [HAI] score) were compared.

RESULTS

Among 548 LBx cases, 213 LBx in 110 recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for PLB. Immunosuppressive therapy after PLB was intensified in 14 LBx (6.6%) recipients (12.7%); of these, nine had late-onset acute rejection, three had isolated perivenular inflammation, one had plasma cell-rich rejection, and one had early chronic rejection. Follow-up LBx after immunosuppressive dose adjustment showed improvement in the modified HAI score grading in 10 of 14 cases (71.4%). No clinical background and blood examination data, including those from the post-LT period, immunosuppressant trough level, or examination for de novo DSA, predicted rejection in PLB. Complications of PLB were found in only three cases.

CONCLUSION

PLB is useful in the management of seemingly stable LT recipients, to discover subclinical rejection and allow for appropriate immunosuppressant dose adjustment.

Donor specific antibodies association with survival and adverse events after heart transplantation: A single center retrospective study between 2006 and 2021

OBJECTIVE

Newly detected donor HLA-specific antibodies (DSA) are historically known to be associated with reduced survival in heart transplant patients. Our objective is to clarify the modern incidence of DSA and determine its relationship with survival and MACE.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation at Harefield Hospital, London between January 1, 2006 and May 31, 2021. We identified patients who developed DSA at any point post heart transplantation and its effect on survival and MACE (defined as rejection, coronary event, stroke, and arrhythmia.

RESULTS

In total of 232 patients were included with a median follow up time of 4.7 years post heart transplantation. 23.7% of patients included developed DSA post heart transplantation. There was a significantly increased risk of death in patients developing DSA versus not (sub distribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.24, p = .04). At the time of detection of DSA, 38.2% of the cohort had rejection necessitating treatment. A MACE event had occurred in 48.1% by 2 years and 53.7% by 3 years in the DSA cohort. There was a significantly increased risk of MACE in patients developing DSA versus not (SHR 2.48 [1.58-3.89, p < .0001]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed an increased risk of death and MACE in patients developing DSA post heart transplantation. Further research is required into the optimal management of these patients.

Current Status of Biomarkers and Molecular Diagnostic Tools for Rejection in Liver Transplantation: Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Strategies to minimize immune-suppressive medications after liver transplantation are limited by allograft rejection. Biopsy of liver is the current standard of care in diagnosing rejection. However, it adds to physical and economic burden to the patient and has diagnostic limitations. In this review, we aim to highlight the different biomarkers to predict and diagnose acute rejection. We also aim to explore recent advances in molecular diagnostics to improve the diagnostic yield of liver biopsies.

Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document

Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.

Incidence of acute rejection and patient survival in combined heart-liver transplantation

Combined heart-liver transplantation (CHLT) is indicated for patients with concomitant end-stage heart and liver disease or patients with amyloid heart disease where liver transplantation mitigates progression. Limited data suggest that the liver allograft provides immunoprotection for heart and kidney allografts in combined transplantation from the same donor. We hypothesized that CHLT reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) compared with heart-alone transplantation (HA). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 32 CHLT and 280 HA recipients in a single-center experience. The primary outcome was incidence of ACR based on protocol and for-cause myocardial biopsy. Rejection was graded by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines with Grade 2R and higher considered significant. Secondary outcomes included the development of new DSAs, cardiac function, and patient and cardiac graft survival rates. Of CHLT patients, 9.7% had ACR compared with 45.3% of HA patients (p < 0.01). Mean pretransplant calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) levels were similar between groups (CHLT 9.4% vs. HA 9.5%; p = 0.97). Among patients who underwent testing, 26.9% of the CHLT and 16.7% of HA developed DSA (p = 0.19). Despite the difference in ACR, patient and cardiac graft survival rates were similar at 5 years (CHLT 82.1% vs. HA 80.9% [p = 0.73]; CHLT 82.1% vs. HA 80.9% [p = 0.73]). CHLT reduced the incidence of ACR in the cardiac allograft, suggesting that the liver offers immunoprotection against cellular mechanisms of rejection without significant impacts on patient and cardiac graft survival rates. CHLT did not reduce the incidence of de novo DSA, possibly portending similar long-term survival among cardiac allografts in CHLT and HA.

Long-term liver allograft fibrosis: A review with emphasis on idiopathic post-transplant hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving surgical procedure and the current standard of care for most patients with end stage liver disease. With improvements in organ preservation techniques, perioperative care, and immunosuppression, there is better patient and graft survival following LT, and assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors is becoming increasingly important. Recurrent or de novo viral or autoimmune injury remains the most common causes of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis following liver transplantation in adults. However, no obvious cause can be identified in many adults with controlled recurrent disease and the majority of pediatric LT recipients, as they have been transplanted for non-recurrent liver diseases. Serial surveillance liver biopsies post LT have been evaluated in several adult and pediatric centers to identify long-term pathological changes. Pathological findings are frequently present in liver biopsies obtained after a year post LT. The significance of these findings is uncertain as many of these are seen in protocol liver biopsies from patients with clinically good allograft function and normal liver chemistry parameters. This narrative review summaries the factors predisposing to long-term liver allograft fibrosis, highlighting the putative role of idiopathic post-LT hepatitis and chronic antibody mediated rejection in its pathogenesis.

Impact of DSA and immunosuppression minimization on rejection, graft, and patient survival after simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation

Background

Acute rejection rate is low after simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation (SLKT), leading some groups to minimize immunosuppressive (IS) regimens. However, the impact of preformed (pDSA) or de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) on the graft remains unclear.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive SLKT patients to study the impact of anti-HLA antibodies.

Results

Anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 75 recipients (class I 23.8%, both classes I and II 23.8%, and class II 14.3%). In total, 42.8% of the patients had pDSA and 21.7% developed dnDSA. Overall patient survival at 1–3 and 5 years, was respectively 88, 84, and 80%. Acute rejection occurred respectively in 3 (2.9%) liver and 6 kidney (5.9%) recipients. pDSA with titers over 10,000 mean fluorescence intensity (14.3%) was associated with lower patient survival (40 vs. 82%) but not with acute rejection. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, the risk of death was associated with maleness, the highest titer of pDSA (p < 0.0007) or the sum of pDSA >10,000. Renal function did not differ between patients with class I pDSA (p = 0.631) and those with class II pDSA (p = 0.112) or between patients with and without a positive cross-match (p = 0.842). dnDSA were not associated with acute rejection, graft dysfunction or patient survival. IS minimization was not associated with rejection, graft dysfunction or death.

Conclusion

In SLKT, high levels of pDSA >10,000 were associated with lower patient survival, but not rejection or graft survival. Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression regimen was not associated with a poorer outcome.

The role of regulatory T cells in liver transplantation

The liver is considered a tolerogenic organ that can induce peripheral tolerance. The exact mechanisms of tolerance in the liver remain undefined. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been demonstrated to be involved in inducing and maintaining peripheral tolerance. They play an important role in the prevention of immune responses and autoimmunity. The main focus of this review is the role of Tregs and their subpopulation in liver transplantation. More specifically, this manuscript will highlight the recent findings about using Treg cells as a biomarker in liver transplantation. There are some reports and animal models about the role of Tregs in the process of rejection of liver transplantation. Previous reports and studies have suggested that by increasing the number of Tregs better liver transplant outcomes will be accomplished by enhancing tolerance. It has been shown that the levels of CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3+ Treg cells correlate with the inhibition of acute allograft rejection in liver transplantation; however, further studies must be done to address the potential role of Treg cells in chronic rejection. Indeed, in the future, Treg cells may have potential use as a beneficial biomarker to screen long-term graft function.

Antibody-mediated rejection of the liver allograft: An update and a clinico-pathological perspective

Antibody-mediated rejection after liver transplantation is an under-recognised cause of allograft injury. While definitions of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection have increased clinical awareness, timely identification and management of antibody-mediated rejection remain difficult because of complexities in diagnosis and histopathology, lack of treatment protocols, and unclear long-term outcomes. While recent cohort studies assessing the importance of donor-specific antibodies have aided in its diagnosis, literature on the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation remain limited to case reports and small series. Further increasing the awareness and timely recognition of antibody-mediated rejection post-liver transplantation is crucial in order to stimulate future research and the development of protocols for its diagnosis and treatment. This review will summarise recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, as well as some of the histopathologic features (on liver biopsy tissue) of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection.