1
|
Bhattarai A, Shah S, Yadav R, Dhakal G, Neupane R, Paudel S, Bhandari P, Abu Serhan H, Sah R, Sah S, Barboza JJ. Diagnostic and prognostic role of elafin in skin acute graft versus host disease: a systematic review. Hematology 2024; 29:2293497. [PMID: 38112182 DOI: 10.1080/16078454.2023.2293497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is the common complication seen after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and a pleomorphic syndrome that resembles autoimmune and other immunologic disorders, leading to profound immune dysregulation and organ dysfunction. The most common targets of GVHD are skin, gastrointestinal tract and liver. GVHD is classified as acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) if it occurs within the first 100 days after HSCT and chronic graft versus host disease(cGVHD) if it occurs after day 100. The skin is most frequently and earliest affected by aGvHD, followed by the gastrointestinal tract and liver. An ideal biomarker would predict the onset and severity of clinical acute GVHD and help to direct management, and this is an area of active research regarding the use of biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of acute GVHD. Recently, elafin has been identified as a potential plasma biomarker for aGVHD. METHOD We searched the databases PubMed, Cochrane library, and medRxiv for all studies investigating the Diagnostic or prognostic role of elafin in GVHD. We set the search strategy incorporating the search terms, 'elafin', 'graft versus host', and 'GVHD', and operated using the Boolean operators 'AND', and 'OR'. Thus, retrieved articles were then exported on an Excel® sheet, and duplicates were removed. The systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After selecting the study based on inclusion criteria, data on study characteristics and biomarker description was extracted on a pre-determined data extraction table on the Microsoft Excel version. The quality assessment of the included studies was determined using the QUIPS tool. RESULT The search revealed 547 studies and 6 studies that met the eligibility criteria of this review have been included. The major finding of our study is the significant elevation of elafin in skin aGVHD. CONCLUSION Elafin is a significant biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of skin aGVHD and should be assessed within 2 weeks of the onset of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sangam Shah
- Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Rukesh Yadav
- Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Garima Dhakal
- Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Raksha Neupane
- Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Sunil Paudel
- Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | - Pragya Bhandari
- Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Nepal
| | | | - Ranjit Sah
- Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
- Department of Microbiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India
| | - Sanjit Sah
- Global Consortium for Public Health and Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, India
- SR Sanjeevani Hospital, Siraha, Nepal
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tampa M, Mitran MI, Mitran CI, Matei C, Georgescu SR. Psoriasis: What Is New in Markers of Disease Severity? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:337. [PMID: 38399624 PMCID: PMC10889935 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction. Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease and is the result of the interaction between numerous external and internal factors. Psoriasis presents a wide range of skin manifestations encompassing individual lesions varying from pinpoint to large plaques that can evolve into generalised forms. The lesions mirror the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in psoriasis pathogenesis, such as inflammation, dysregulation of immune response, uncontrolled proliferation of keratinocytes and angiogenesis. In this article, we present the latest advances achieved regarding markers that correlate with psoriasis severity. Material and method. We have performed a narrative review on markers of psoriasis severity, including articles published between March 2018-March 2023. Results. We have identified four categories of markers: inflammation markers, oxidative stress markers, hormonal markers and cancer-related markers. The main focus was on inflammation biomarkers, including immunomodulatory molecules, haematological parameters, inflammatory cells and costimulatory molecules. Conclusions. The analysed data indicate that markers associated with inflammation, oxidative stress and hormones, and cancer-related markers could be useful in assessing the severity of psoriasis. Nevertheless, additional research is required to ascertain the practical importance of these biomarkers in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mircea Tampa
- Department of Dermatology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (M.T.); (C.M.); (S.R.G.)
- Department of Dermatology, ‘Victor Babes’ Clinical Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 030303 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalina Irina Mitran
- Department of Microbiology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristina Iulia Mitran
- Department of Microbiology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Clara Matei
- Department of Dermatology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (M.T.); (C.M.); (S.R.G.)
| | - Simona Roxana Georgescu
- Department of Dermatology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (M.T.); (C.M.); (S.R.G.)
- Department of Dermatology, ‘Victor Babes’ Clinical Hospital for Infectious Diseases, 030303 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oza K, Kang J, Patil D, Owen KL, Cui W, Khan K, Kaufman SS, Kroemer A. Current Advances in Graft-versus-host Disease After Intestinal Transplantation. Transplantation 2024; 108:399-408. [PMID: 37309025 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a potentially fatal complication following intestinal transplant (ITx). Over the past decade, advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex immunological phenomenon have led to the reassessment of the host systemic immune response and have created a gateway for novel preventive and therapeutic strategies. Although sufficient evidence dictates the use of corticosteroids as a first-line option, the treatment for refractory disease remains contentious and lacks a standardized therapeutic approach. Timely diagnosis remains crucial, and the advent of chimerism detection and immunological biomarkers have transformed the identification, prognostication, and potential for survival after GvHD in ITx. The objectives of the following review aim to discuss the clinical and diagnostic features, pathophysiology, advances in immune biomarkers, as well as therapeutic opportunities in the prevention and treatment of GvHD in ITx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kesha Oza
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Department of General Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Jiman Kang
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Digvijay Patil
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Kathryn L Owen
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Wanxing Cui
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular & Cellular Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Khalid Khan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Stuart S Kaufman
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Alexander Kroemer
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and the Center for Translational Transplant Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bidgoli A, DePriest BP, Saatloo MV, Jiang H, Fu D, Paczesny S. Current Definitions and Clinical Implications of Biomarkers in Graft-versus-Host Disease. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:657-666. [PMID: 35830932 PMCID: PMC9547856 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematologic and nonhematologic disorders. Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) in its acute or chronic form remains the most important nonrelapse post-HCT complication. Biomarkers offer objective, unbiased information on systemic disorders, and significant attention has focused on identifying biomarkers for GVHD. Ideally, a GVHD biomarker is actionable, with the results of biomarker testing used to guide clinical management of disease and clinical trial design. Although many GVHD biomarkers have been identified, none have been properly qualified for clinical use. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have provided biomarker subtype definitions; however, confusion remains about the proper definition and application of these subtypes in the HCT field. The 2014 NIH consensus development project provided a framework for the development of biomarkers for clinical practice. This review aims to clarify the biomarker subtype definitions and reemphasize the developmental framework. Armed with this knowledge, clinicians can properly translate GVHD biomarkers for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Bidgoli
- Departments of (1)Microbiology and Immunology and (2)Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Brittany Paige DePriest
- Departments of (1)Microbiology and Immunology and (2)Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Maedeh Vakili Saatloo
- Departments of (1)Microbiology and Immunology and (2)Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Hua Jiang
- Departments of (1)Microbiology and Immunology and (2)Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Denggang Fu
- Departments of (1)Microbiology and Immunology and (2)Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Sophie Paczesny
- Departments of (1)Microbiology and Immunology and (2)Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heo SK, Noh EK, Lee YJ, Shin Y, Kim Y, Im HS, Kim H, Koh SJ, Min YJ, Jo JC, Choi Y. The soluble VCAM-1 level is a potential biomarker predicting severe acute graft versus host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:997. [PMID: 36127634 PMCID: PMC9487033 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10096-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe graft versus host disease (GVHD) is the main reason for non-relapse mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We investigated the serum protein profiles of patients who had undergone HCT to identify predictive biomarkers of severe acute GVHD (aGVHD). Methods Serum samples were collected for 30 patients from day − 7 to day + 14 of HCT. The serum levels of plasma beta2-microglobulin (β2-MG), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), platelet factor 4, and TNFSF-14 were measured by ELISA as potential biomarkers following 310 cytokine profiling array. Results The median age of the study patients was 53.5 years (range, 19–69). All grade and grade 2–4 aGVHD developed in 21 (70.0%) and 17 (56.7%) patients, respectively. Compared with their baseline levels on day − 7, β2-MG and sVCAM-1 were significantly increased on day + 14 of the HCT procedure (P = 0.028 and P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with a grade 2–4 severe aGVHD showed a significantly higher sVCAM-1 level at baseline (day-7) and at day + 14, compared with the other group with a grade 1 aGVHD or no aGVHD (P = 0.028 and P = 0.035, respectively). Conclusion Higher sVCAM- levels at baseline and on day + 14 in HCT patients could be a significant predictive biomarker of severe aGVHD. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10096-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sook-Kyoung Heo
- Biomedical Research Center, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui-Kyu Noh
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoo Jin Lee
- Biomedical Research Center, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.,Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea
| | - Yerang Shin
- Biomedical Research Center, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Youjin Kim
- Biomedical Research Center, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.,Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon-Su Im
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeyeong Kim
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Jin Koh
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Joo Min
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Cheol Jo
- Biomedical Research Center, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea. .,Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwan-doro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yunsuk Choi
- Department of Hematology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Y, Hao J, Hu Z, Yang YG, Zhou Q, Sun L, Wu J. Current status of clinical trials assessing mesenchymal stem cell therapy for graft versus host disease: a systematic review. Stem Cell Res Ther 2022; 13:93. [PMID: 35246235 PMCID: PMC8895864 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-022-02751-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common fatal complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), where steroids are used as a treatment option. However, there are currently no second-line treatments for patients that develop steroid-resistance (SR). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have immunomodulatory functions and can exert immunosuppressive effects on the inflammatory microenvironment. A large number of in vitro experiments have confirmed that MSCs can significantly inhibit the proliferation or activation of innate and adaptive immune cells. In a mouse model of GVHD, MSCs improved weight loss and increased survival rate. Therefore, there is great promise for the clinical translation of MSCs for the prevention or treatment of GVHD, and several clinical trials have already been conducted to date. Main body In this study, we searched multiple databases and found 79 clinical trials involving the use of MSCs to prevent or treat GVHD and summarized the characteristics of these clinical trials, including study design, phase, status, and locations. We analyzed the results of these clinical trials, including the response and survival rates, to enable researchers to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the field’s progress, challenges, limitations, and future development trends. Additionally, factors that might result in inconsistencies in clinical trial results were discussed. Conclusion In this study, we attempted to analyze the clinical trials for MSCs in GVHD, identify the most suitable group of patients for MSC therapy, and provide a new perspective for the design of such trials in the future. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-022-02751-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Li
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Transplantation of Ministry of Education, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130061, China.,National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Models for Human Diseases, Changchun, 130061, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, The First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China
| | - Jie Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.,Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.,National Stem Cell Resource Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
| | - Zheng Hu
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Transplantation of Ministry of Education, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130061, China.,National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Models for Human Diseases, Changchun, 130061, China
| | - Yong-Guang Yang
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Transplantation of Ministry of Education, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130061, China.,National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Models for Human Diseases, Changchun, 130061, China.,International Center of Future Science, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China
| | - Qi Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. .,Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. .,National Stem Cell Resource Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. .,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| | - Liguang Sun
- Key Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Transplantation of Ministry of Education, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130061, China. .,National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Models for Human Diseases, Changchun, 130061, China.
| | - Jun Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. .,Institute for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. .,National Stem Cell Resource Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zewde MG, Morales G, Gandhi I, Özbek U, Aguayo-Hiraldo P, Ayuk F, Baez J, Chanswangphuwana C, Choe H, DeFilipp Z, Etra A, Grupp S, Hexner EO, Hogan W, Javorniczky NR, Kasikis S, Kitko CL, Kowalyk S, Meedt E, Merli P, Nakamura R, Qayed M, Reshef R, Rösler W, Schechter T, Weber D, Wölfl M, Yanik G, Young R, Levine JE, Ferrara JLM, Chen YB. Evaluation of Elafin as a Prognostic Biomarker in Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:988.e1-988.e7. [PMID: 34474163 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for hematologic malignancies. The skin is the most commonly involved organ in GVHD. Elafin, a protease inhibitor overexpressed in inflamed epidermis, was previously identified as a diagnostic biomarker of skin GVHD; however, this finding was restricted to a subset of patients with isolated skin GVHD. The main driver of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in HCT recipients is gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD. Two biomarkers, Regenerating islet-derived 3a (REG3α) and Suppressor of tumorigenesis 2 (ST2), have been validated as biomarkers of GI GVHD that predict long-term outcomes in patients treated for GVHD. We undertook this study to determine the utility of elafin as a prognostic biomarker in the general population of acute GVHD patients in whom GVHD may develop in multiple organs. We analyzed serum elafin concentrations as a predictive biomarker of acute GVHD outcomes and compared it with ST2 and REG3α in a large group of patients treated at multiple centers. A total of 526 patients from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) who had received corticosteroid treatment for skin GVHD and who had not been previously studied were analyzed. Serum concentrations of elafin, ST2, and REG3α were measured by ELISA in all patients. The patients were divided at random into equal training and validation sets, and a competing-risk regression model was developed to model 6-month NRM using elafin concentration in the training set. Additional models were developed using concentrations of ST2 and REG3α or the combination of all 3 biomarkers as predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed using the validation set to evaluate the predictive accuracy of each model and to stratify patients into high- and low-risk biomarker groups. The cumulative incidence of 6-month NRM, overall survival (OS), and 4-week treatment response were compared between the risk groups. Unexpectedly, patients in the low-risk elafin group demonstrated a higher incidence of 6-month NRM, although the difference was not statistically significant (17% versus 11%; P = .19). OS at 6 months (68% versus 68%; P > .99) and 4-week response (78% versus 78%; P = .98) were similar in the low-risk and high-risk elafin groups. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.55 for elafin and 0.75 for the combination of ST2 and REG3α. The addition of elafin to the other 2 biomarkers did not improve the AUC. Our data indicate that serum elafin concentrations measured at the initiation of systemic treatment for acute GVHD did not predict 6-month NRM, OS, or treatment response in a multicenter population of patients treated systemically for acute GVHD. As seen in previous studies, serum concentrations of the GI GVHD biomarkers ST2 and REG3α were significant predictors of NRM, and the addition of elafin levels did not improve their accuracy. These results underscore the importance of GI disease in driving NRM in patients who develop acute GVHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makda Getachew Zewde
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - George Morales
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Isha Gandhi
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Umut Özbek
- Biostatistics Shared Resource Facility, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Paibel Aguayo-Hiraldo
- Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Section, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Francis Ayuk
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Janna Baez
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Hannah Choe
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Zachariah DeFilipp
- Hematopoietic Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aaron Etra
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Stephan Grupp
- Division of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth O Hexner
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William Hogan
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nora Rebeka Javorniczky
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stelios Kasikis
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Carrie L Kitko
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Steven Kowalyk
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Elisabeth Meedt
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Pietro Merli
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Ryotaro Nakamura
- Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Muna Qayed
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta
| | - Ran Reshef
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Wolf Rösler
- Department of Internal Medicine 5, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tal Schechter
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniela Weber
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Wölfl
- Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Children's Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gregory Yanik
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Rachel Young
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - John E Levine
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - James L M Ferrara
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Yi-Bin Chen
- Hematopoietic Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shakshouk H, Tkaczyk ER, Cowen EW, El-Azhary RA, Hashmi SK, Kenderian SJ, Lehman JS. Methods to Assess Disease Activity and Severity in Cutaneous Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Critical Literature Review. Transplant Cell Ther 2021; 27:738-746. [PMID: 34107339 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a potentially debilitating complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation, confers increased risk for mortality. Whereas treatment decisions rely on an accurate assessment of disease activity/severity, validated methods of assessing cutaneous cGVHD activity/severity appear to be limited. In this study, we aimed to identify and evaluate current data on the assessment of disease activity/severity in cutaneous cGVHD. Using modified PRISMA methods, we performed a critical literature review for relevant articles. Our literature search identified 1741 articles, of which 1635 were excluded as duplicates or failure to meet inclusion criteria. Of the included studies (n = 106), 39 (37%) addressed clinical and/or histopathologic parameters, 53 (50%) addressed serologic parameters, 8 (7.5%) addressed imaging parameters, and 6 (5.5%) addressed computer-based technologies. The only formally validated metric of disease activity/severity assessment in cutaneous cGVHD is the National Institutes of Health consensus scoring system, which is founded on clinical assessment alone. The lack of an objective marker for cGVHD necessitates further studies. An evaluation of the potential contributions of serologic, imaging, and/or computer-based technologies is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadir Shakshouk
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Dermatology, Andrology and Venerology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Eric R Tkaczyk
- Dermatology and Research Services, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN; Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Edward W Cowen
- Dermatology Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Shahrukh K Hashmi
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | - Julia S Lehman
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|