Incidence and Risk of Infection Associated With Fingolimod in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 8,448 Patients From 12 Randomized Controlled Trials

Disseminated tuberculosis associated with fingolimod treatment in a patient with multiple sclerosis

Fingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator approved as a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). A woman in her 30s was treated with fingolimod for relapsing-remitting MS. After 7 years of treatment, she presented with non-productive cough, night sweats, breathlessness and unintentional weight loss. She had a negative interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). A high-resolution CT thorax showed innumerable miliary opacities in both lungs. Bronchoalveolar lavage was positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex PCR. An MRI head showed multiple small punctate contrast-enhancing lesions most typical for tuberculomas. We describe the first reported case of disseminated tuberculosis (TB) associated with fingolimod treatment. Patients who are receiving DMT must be closely observed for the development of opportunistic infections, and IGRA results should be interpreted with caution. Screening for latent TB prior to commencing fingolimod should be considered on an individual basis. The management of TB in MS patients on DMT requires an interdisciplinary approach.

The association between various viral infections and multiple sclerosis: An umbrella review on systematic review and meta-analysis

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the immune-mediated demyelinating disorders. Multiple components, including the environment and genetics, are possible factors in the pathogenesis of MS. Also, it can be said that infections are a key component of the host's response to MS development. Finally, we evaluated the relationship between different pathogens and MS disease in this umbrella research. We systematically collected and analysed multiple meta-analyses focused on one particular topic. We utilised the Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science databases starting with inception until 30 May 2023. The methodological quality of the analysed meta-analysis has been determined based on Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 and Grade, and graph construction and statistical analysis were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. The Confidence Interval of effect size was 95% in meta-analyses, and p < 0.05 indicated a statistically meaningful relationship. The included studies evaluated the association between MS and 12 viruses containing SARS-CoV-2, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Hepatitis B virus, varicella-zoster virus (VZV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), HHV-7, HHV-8, HSV-1, HSV-2, Cytomegalovirus, Human Papillomavirus, and influenza. SARS-CoV-2, with a 3.74 odds ratio, has a significantly more potent negative effect on MS among viral infections. After that, EBV, HHV-6, HSV-2, and VZV, respectively, with 3.33, 2.81, 1.76, and 1.72 odds ratios, had a significantly negative relationship with MS (p < 0.05). Although the theoretical evidence mostly indicates that EBV has the greatest effect on MS, recent epidemiological studies have challenged this conclusion and put forward possibilities that SARS-CoV-2 is the culprit. Hence, it was necessary to investigate the effects of SARS-CoV-2 and EBV on MS.

Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod

A 21-year-old woman with multiple sclerosis (taking regular fingolimod) developed sudden-onset severe headache with nausea and malaise. Neurological examination was normal and she was afebrile. Blood results showed lymphocytes 0.53 x 109/L and C reactive protein 19 mg/L. CT scan of head and venogram were normal. CSF showed an opening pressure of 33 cm H2O and an incidental light growth of Cryptococcus neoformans, confirmed with positive India Ink stain and a positive cryptococcal antigen (1:100). She was treated for cryptococcal meningoencephalitis with amphotericin and flucytosine. Her presenting symptoms had closely mimicked subarachnoid haemorrhage. This atypical presentation of cryptococcal CNS infection highlights the need for vigilance in immunosuppressed patients.

A short washout period from fingolimod to anti-CD20 therapy is safe and decreases the risk of reactivation

The frequency of switches between Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has increased considerably over previous years. Between fingolimod and anti-CD20 therapies, a 1-month washout period is usually recommended. However, disease reactivations are frequent after fingolimod (Fg) cessation. Using a retrospective observational monocentric exposed/non-exposed cohort study, we investigated the efficacy and the safety of a shorter washout period (WP) between Fg and anti-CD20. We compared two groups: 25 patients with a short WP (<21 days) and 20 patients with a longer WP (>21 days). We observed no reactivation during WP in patients with a short WP against a relapse in 55% of patients in the longer group. Moreover, clinical and biological safety was excellent. Based on these findings, we recommend a shorter WP between fingolimod and anti-CD20 therapies in MS.

Central nervous system demyelinating diseases: glial cells at the hub of pathology

Inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IDDs) are among the main causes of inflammatory and neurodegenerative injury of the central nervous system (CNS) in young adult patients. Of these, multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most frequent and studied, as it affects about a million people in the USA alone. The understanding of the mechanisms underlying their pathology has been advancing, although there are still no highly effective disease-modifying treatments for the progressive symptoms and disability in the late stages of disease. Among these mechanisms, the action of glial cells upon lesion and regeneration has become a prominent research topic, helped not only by the discovery of glia as targets of autoantibodies, but also by their role on CNS homeostasis and neuroinflammation. In the present article, we discuss the participation of glial cells in IDDs, as well as their association with demyelination and synaptic dysfunction throughout the course of the disease and in experimental models, with a focus on MS phenotypes. Further, we discuss the involvement of microglia and astrocytes in lesion formation and organization, remyelination, synaptic induction and pruning through different signaling pathways. We argue that evidence of the several glia-mediated mechanisms in the course of CNS demyelinating diseases supports glial cells as viable targets for therapy development.

Alternate dosing of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

Background: Fingolimod is approved in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with the recommended dose of 0.5 mg daily. To tackle possible adverse events, some clinicians may reduce the dose of fingolimod, mainly in the alternate-day form. We systematically reviewed the literature for efficacy measures of this method. Methods: PubMed (Medline®), Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched until April 9, 2021. Clinical studies (other than case reports and case series), in English, were included. Then, publications concerning alternate dose fingolimod (including every other day, every two or three days) were selected. Those studies concerning reduced daily dose (any daily dose less than 0.5 mg/day) were excluded to focus on alternate dosing. Results: Four observational studies were included. Data on Ohtani et al. study were limited. Three other studies were of good quality based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 296 patients on the standard dose were compared to 276 patients on the alternate dosage. The most common reason for switching to the alternate dose was lymphopenia, followed by elevated liver enzymes. Two studies concluded that the alternate dosing could be a safe, yet effective strategy in patients with intolerable adverse effects of daily dose. However, Zecca et al. warned about the high possibility of disease reactivation. Due to the differences in outcome measures of the studies, meta-analysis was not applicable. Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the ambiguity of evidence on safety and efficacy of alternate dosing of fingolimod, encouraging further research on the subject.

A Case of Fingolimod-associated Cryptococcal Meningitis

BACKGROUND

Leukopenia, a rare adverse effect of Fingolimod therapy, paves the way for opportunistic infections. In this study, we reported rare fingolimod associated cryptococcal meningitis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 39-year-old woman with RRMS was referred to the emergency department. The patient's major complaints were headache, fever, weakness, and progressive loss of consciousness within the last two days prior to the referral. The patient had a history of hospitalization due to RRMS [two times]. In the second hospitalization, interferon Beta-1a was replaced with Fingolimod. Using polymerase chain reaction, Cryptococcus neoformans was detected in CSF. Liposomal amphotericin B and fluconazole [800 mg per day] were started. Six weeks later, the patient was discharged without any major complaints.

CONCLUSION

Albeit fingolimod associated cryptococcal meningitis is a rare event, Fingolimod therapy in patients with MS should be performed cautiously. Regular follow-ups may give rise to a timely diagnosis of probable fingolimod associated cryptococcal meningitis. Fingolimod therapy can lead to lymphocytopenia and various infections. We, therefore, suggest that intermittent blood lymphocyte counts as well as monitoring of clinical manifestations among MS patients treated with Fingolimod to avoid additional neurological and physical disabilities in these patients.

Multiple Sclerosis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose of Review

COVID-19 has posed a continuously evolving challenge for providers caring for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). While guidelines from national and international organizations came quickly, these have required constant reassessment and modification as the pandemic has progressed. This review aims to assess the first 2 years of literature on COVID-19 relevant to the clinical management of patients with MS. In particular, we will review how MS impacts the risk of COVID-19 infection, how disease-modifying therapies may alter this risk, and explore considerations regarding disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and vaccination for COVID-19. We will also explore potential ways in which a COVID-19 infection may impact multiple sclerosis. Our goal is to provide an overarching review of the major findings at this stage of the pandemic relevant to those that care for patients with MS.

Recent Findings

Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, providers have had to re-evaluate the priorities in the management of MS. A growing number of studies have evaluated the relevant risk factors and considerations regarding MS and particular disease-modifying therapies.

Summary

The long-term impacts of the pandemic on the health of those with MS will continue to be revealed. In general, most patients with MS do not need major revisions to their treatment plan due to COVID-19 risk. However, individuals who are older, more disabled, and on more potent therapies may need to consider strategies for decreasing their overall risk. Regardless, continued improvement in our understanding of interactions between infections, disease-modifying therapy, and MS are paramount to optimizing the care of those with MS going forward.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-targeted therapeutics in rheumatic diseases

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), which acts via G protein-coupled S1P receptors (S1PRs), is a bioactive lipid essential for vascular integrity and lymphocyte trafficking. The S1P-S1PR signalling axis is a key component of the inflammatory response in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Several drugs that target S1PRs have been approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease and are under clinical testing for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Preclinical studies support the hypothesis that targeting the S1P-S1PR axis would be beneficial to patients with SLE, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) by reducing pathological inflammation. Whereas most preclinical research and development efforts are focused on reducing lymphocyte trafficking, protective effects of circulating S1P on endothelial S1PRs, which maintain the vascular barrier and enable blood circulation while dampening leukocyte extravasation, have been largely overlooked. In this Review, we take a holistic view of S1P-S1PR signalling in lymphocyte and vascular pathobiology. We focus on the potential of S1PR modulators for the treatment of SLE, RA and SSc and summarize the rationale, pathobiology and evidence from preclinical models and clinical studies. Improved understanding of S1P pathobiology in autoimmune rheumatic diseases and S1PR therapeutic modulation is anticipated to lead to efficacious and safer management of these diseases.

A Network Comparison on Safety Profiling of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Lung Cancer

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the standard treatment options for advanced lung cancer. However, adverse events (AEs), particularly immune–related AEs (irAEs), caused by these drugs have aroused public attention. The current network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the risk of AEs across different ICI–based regimens in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases (from inception to 19 April 2021) for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared two or more treatments, with at least one ICI administered to patients with advanced lung cancer. The primary outcomes were treatment–related AEs and irAEs, including grade 1–5 and grade 3–5. The secondary outcomes were grade 1–5 and grade 3–5 irAEs in specific organs. Both pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted for chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy, ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy, dual ICIs therapy, and dual ICIs + chemotherapy for all safety outcomes. Node–splitting analyses were performed to test inconsistencies in network. Sensitivity analyses were adopted by restricting phase III RCTs and studies that enrolled patients with non–small cell lung cancer.

Results

Overall, 38 RCTs involving 22,178 patients with advanced lung cancer were enrolled. Both pooled incidence and NMA indicated that treatments containing chemotherapy increased the risk of treatment–related AEs when compared with ICI-based regimens without chemotherapy. As for grade 1–5 irAEs, dual ICIs + chemotherapy was associated with the highest risk of irAEs (probability in ranking first: 50.5%), followed by dual-ICI therapy (probability in ranking second: 47.2%), ICI monotherapy (probability in ranking third: 80.0%), ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy (probability in ranking fourth: 98.0%), and finally chemotherapy (probability in ranking fifth: 100.0%). In grade 3–5 irAEs, subtle differences were observed; when ranked from least safe to safest, the trend was dual ICIs therapy (60.4%), dual ICIs + chemotherapy (42.5%), ICI monotherapy (76.3%), ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy (95.0%), and chemotherapy (100.0%). Furthermore, detailed comparisons between ICI–based options provided irAE profiles based on specific organ/system and severity.

Conclusions

In consideration of overall immune–related safety profiles, ICI monotherapy + chemotherapy might be a better choice among ICI–based treatments for advanced lung cancer. The safety profiles of ICI–based treatments are various by specific irAEs and their severity.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42021268650