Protective Role of Kynurenine 3-Monooxygenase in Allograft Rejection and Tubular Injury in Kidney Transplantation

Kynurenine Pathway after Kidney Transplantation: Friend or Foe?

Kidney transplantation significantly improves the survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) compared to other forms of kidney replacement therapy. However, kidney transplant recipients' outcomes are not fully satisfactory due to increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, infections, and malignancies. Immune-related complications remain the biggest challenge in the management of kidney graft recipients. Despite the broad spectrum of immunosuppressive agents available and more detailed methods used to monitor their effectiveness, chronic allograft nephropathy remains the most common cause of kidney graft rejection. The kynurenine (KYN) pathway is the main route of tryptophan (Trp) degradation, resulting in the production of a plethora of substances with ambiguous properties. Conversion of Trp to KYN by the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is the rate-limiting step determining the formation of the next agents from the KYN pathway. IDO activity, as well as the production of subsequent metabolites of the pathway, is highly dependent on the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory conditions. Moreover, KYN pathway products themselves possess immunomodulating properties, e.g., modify the activity of IDO and control other immune-related processes. KYN metabolites were widely studied in neurological disorders but recently gained the attention of researchers in the context of immune-mediated diseases. Evidence that this route of Trp degradation may represent a peripheral tolerogenic pathway with significant implications for transplantation further fueled this interest. Our review aimed to present recent knowledge about the role of the KYN pathway in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients' complications.

Metabolic reprogramming of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the context of organ transplantation

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are naturally occurring leukocytes that develop from immature myeloid cells under inflammatory conditions that were discovered initially in the context of tumor immunity. Because of their robust immune inhibitory activities, there has been growing interest in MDSC-based cellular therapies for transplant tolerance induction. Indeed, various pre-clinical studies have introduced in vivo expansion or adoptive transfer of MDSC as a promising therapeutic strategy leading to a profound extension of allograft survival due to suppression of alloreactive T cells. However, several limitations of cellular therapies using MDSCs remain to be addressed, including their heterogeneous nature and limited expansion capacity. Metabolic reprogramming plays a crucial role for differentiation, proliferation and effector function of immune cells. Notably, recent reports have focused on a distinct metabolic phenotype underlying the differentiation of MDSCs in an inflammatory microenvironment representing a regulatory target. A better understanding of the metabolic reprogramming of MDSCs may thus provide novel insights for MDSC-based treatment approaches in transplantation. In this review, we will summarize recent, interdisciplinary findings on MDSCs metabolic reprogramming, dissect the underlying molecular mechanisms and discuss the relevance for potential treatment approaches in solid-organ transplantation.

Genetically modified immunomodulatory cell-based biomaterials in tissue regeneration and engineering

To date, the wide application of cell-based biomaterials in tissue engineering and regeneration is remarkably hampered by immune rejection. Reducing the immunogenicity of cell-based biomaterials has become the latest direction in biomaterial research. Recently, genetically modified cell-based biomaterials with immunomodulatory genes have become a feasible solution to the immunogenicity problem. In this review, recent advances and future challenges of genetically modified immunomodulatory cell-based biomaterials are elaborated, including fabrication approaches, mechanisms of common immunomodulatory genes, application and, more importantly, current preclinical and clinical advances. The fabrication approaches can be categorized into commonly used (e.g., virus transfection) and newly developed approaches. The immunomodulatory mechanisms of representative genes involve complicated cell signaling pathways and metabolic activities. Wide application in curing multiple end-term diseases and replacing lifelong immunosuppressive therapy in multiple cell and organ transplantation models is demonstrated. Most significantly, practices of genetically modified organ transplantation have been conducted on brain-dead human decedent and even on living patients after a series of experiments on nonhuman primates. Nevertheless, uncertain biosecurity, nonspecific effects and overlooked personalization of current genetically modified immunomodulatory cell-based biomaterials are shortcomings that remain to be overcome.

Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1: A Promising Therapeutic Target in Malignant Tumor

Tumorigenesis is a complex multifactorial and multistep process in which tumors can utilize a diverse repertoire of immunosuppressive mechanisms to evade host immune attacks. The degradation of tryptophan into immunosuppressive kynurenine is considered an important immunosuppressive mechanism in the tumor microenvironment. There are three enzymes, namely, tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 2 (IDO2), involved in the metabolism of tryptophan. IDO1 has a wider distribution and higher activity in catalyzing tryptophan than the other two; therefore, it has been studied most extensively. IDO1 is a cytosolic monomeric, heme-containing enzyme, which is now considered an authentic immune regulator and represents one of the promising drug targets for tumor immunotherapy. Collectively, this review highlights the regulation of IDO1 gene expression and the ambivalent mechanisms of IDO1 on the antitumoral immune response. Further, new therapeutic targets via the regulation of IDO1 are discussed. A comprehensive analysis of the expression and biological function of IDO1 can help us to understand the therapeutic strategies of the inhibitors targeting IDO1 in malignant tumors.