HLA Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation: Anti-CD38 to Across the Immunological Barriers

Advances in desensitization for human leukocyte antigen incompatible kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major barrier to kidney transplantation induced by exposure to alloantigens through pregnancy, blood product exposure and previous transplantations. Desensitization strategies are undertaken to improve the chances of finding compatible organ offers. Standard approaches to desensitization include the use of plasmapheresis/low dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or high dose IVIG plus anti-CD20. However, current methods to reduce HLA antibodies are not always successful, especially in those with calculated panel reactive antibody 99-100%.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer desensitization strategies such as imlifidase [immunoglobulin G (IgG) endopeptidase] rapidly inactivates IgG molecules and creates an "antibody-free zone", representing an important advancement in desensitization. However, pathogenic antibodies rebound, increasing allograft injury that is not addressed by imlifidase. Here, use of anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) or anti-interleukin-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B-memory and plasma cell DSA responses to limit graft injury. Agents aimed at long-lived plasma cells (anti-CD38 and anti-BCMAxCD3) could reduce or eliminate HLA-producing plasma cells from marrow niches. Other agents such as complement inhibitors and novel agents inhibiting the Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) mediated IgG recycling will likely find important roles in desensitization.

SUMMARY

Use of these agents alone or in combination will likely improve the efficacy and durability of desensitization therapies, improving access to kidney transplantation for immunologically disadvantaged patients.

Immunology demystified: A guide for transplant hepatologists

Liver transplantation has become standard practice for treating end-stage liver disease. The success of the procedure relies on effective immunosuppressive medications to control the host's immune response. Despite the liver's inherent capacity to foster tolerance, the early post-transplant period is marked by significant immune reactivity. To ensure favorable outcomes, it is imperative to identify and manage various rejection types, encompassing T-cell-mediated, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejection. However, the approach to prescribing immunosuppressants relies heavily on clinical judgment rather than evidence-based criteria. Given that the majority of patients will require lifelong immuno suppression as the mechanisms underlying operational tolerance are still being investigated, healthcare providers must possess an understanding of immune responses, rejection mechanisms, and the pathways targeted by immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge enables customization of treatments and improved patient care, even though a consensus on an optimal immunosuppressive regimen remains elusive.

Management of the sensitized pediatric renal transplant candidate

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with ESRD as it is associated with improved patient survival and better quality of life, especially in children. There are several barriers to a successful transplant including organ shortage, anatomic barriers, and immunologic barriers. One of the biggest immunologic barriers that precludes transplantation is sensitization, when patients have antibodies prior to transplantation, resulting in positive crossmatches with donor. 30%-40% of adult patients on the wait list are sensitized. There is a growing number of pediatric patients on the wait list who are sensitized. This poses a unique challenge to the pediatric transplant community. Therefore, attempts to perform desensitization to remove or suppress pathogenic HLA antibodies resulting in acceptable crossmatches, and ultimately a successful transplant, while reducing the risk of acute rejection, are much needed in these children. This review article aims to address the management of such patients both prior to transplantation, with strategies to overcome sensitization, and after transplantation with monitoring for allograft rejection and other complications.

Modern advances in heart transplantation

Heart transplantation (HTx) is the only definitive therapy for patients with end stage heart disease. With the increasing global prevalence of heart failure, the demand for HTx has continued to grow and outpace supply. In this paper, we will review advances in the field of HTx along the clinical journey of a HTx recipient. Starting with the sensitized patient, we discuss current methods to define sensitization, and assays to help identify clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies. Desensitization strategies targeting all levels of the adaptive immune system are discussed with emphasis on novel techniques such as anti-CD 38 blockade and use of the Immunoglobulin G-Degrading Enzyme of Streptococcus Pyogenes. We next discuss donor procurement and the resurgence of donation after circulatory death as a viable strategy to significantly and safely increase the donor pool. Post-transplant, we evaluate non-invasive surveillance techniques including gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA. Last, we discuss the ground-breaking developments in the field of xenotransplantation.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and hyperimmune globulin

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been developed for over 40 years. The mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and diverse, and there may be multiple mechanisms that combine to influence it. IVIG has been used in kidney transplantation for desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and ABO-incompatible transplantation. and treatment or prevention of some infectious diseases. Hyperimmune globulins such as cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IG) and hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) have also been used to protect against cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B virus, respectively. However, IVIG is also associated with some rare but serious adverse effects and some application risks, and clinicians need to weigh the pros and cons and develop individualized treatment programs to benefit more patients. This review will provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and prophylactic measures of IVIG, and hyperimmune globulin will also be introduced in it.

Platelet transfusion refractoriness due to HLA alloimmunization: Evolving paradigms in mechanisms and management

Platelet transfusion refractoriness due to HLA alloimmunization presents a significant medical problem, particularly among multiply transfused patients with hematologic malignancies and those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants. HLA compatible platelet transfusions also impose significant financial burden on these patients. Recently, several novel mechanisms have been described in the development of HLA alloimmunization and platelet transfusion refractoriness. We review the history of platelet transfusions and mechanisms of HLA-sensitization and transfusion refractoriness. We also summarize advances in the diagnosis and treatment of platelet transfusion refractoriness due to HLA alloimmunization.

Donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with graft failure and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although earlier reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution from January 2008 to December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 Single Antigen Beads (SAB) assays, DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions, C1q-binding assay, and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, whereas the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression or Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0-61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% were transplanted for nonmalignant diseases. Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive. Of them, 10 had preexisting DSAs, and one showed post-transplant de novo DSA. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 had 2 DSAs, and 1 had 3 DSAs, with a median MFI of 4334 (range, 588-20,456) and 3581 (range, 227-12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF. Of them, 12 had primary graft rejection, 8 had secondary graft rejection, and 1 had primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidences of GF at 28, 100, and 365 days were 4.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.6%), 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.8%), and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.2%), respectively. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74; P = .0003) than patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65-4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR = 7.60; 95%CI, 2.61-22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 vs. 1250; P = .006) and in LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 vs. 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.26, P = .14).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and poor hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Thus, careful pre-transplant DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.

Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Kidney Transplant Candidates

Access to kidney transplantation is limited by HLA-specific sensitization. Desensitization strategies enable crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation. In this review, we describe clinical experience gained over the last 20 y using desensitization strategies before kidney transplantation and describe the different tools used (both drugs and apheresis options), including IVIg, rituximab, apheresis techniques, interleukin-6 interference, proteasome inhibition, enzymatic degradation of HLA antibodies, complement inhibition, and B cytokine interference. Although access to transplantation for highly sensitized kidney transplantation candidates has been vastly improved by desensitization strategies, it remains, however, limited by the recurrence of HLA antibodies after transplantation and the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection.

Case report: Daratumumab for treatment of refractory late or chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft recipients with high levels of de novo donor-specific antibodies

Background

Late or chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) after renal transplantation is a great clinical challenge because it is often resistant to conventional therapies. Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that can deplete plasma cells, may be effective for the treatment of late or chronic active AMR.

Methods

We designed a novel regimen that included early intensive therapy with daratumumab plus plasmapheresis (PP)/intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and later maintenance therapy with daratumumab alone, and used this regimen to treat late or chronic active AMR in two kidney transplant recipients with extremely high levels of anti-DQ7 dnDSA.

Results

Both patients had a limited clinical response to the early treatment with rituximab and PP/IVIG (with or without splenic irradiation); however, they had a remarkable decrease in anti-DQ7 DSA (MFI value from ~20,000 to ~5,000) after 2-3 months of intensive therapy with daratumumab plus PP/IVIG. Over 20 months of follow-up, patient 1 maintained a low DSA (as low as 1,572) and normal renal function on daratumumab maintenance therapy. Patient 2 retained a low DSA and improved renal function and pathological lesions within one year after treatment but then deteriorated because of acute T cell-mediated rejection.

Conclusions

Our daratumumab-based regimen has shown promising results in the treatment of refractory late active or chronic active AMR in renal transplant recipients with high-level dnDSA. This may provide a reference for better use of daratumumab in the treatment of late or chronic active AMR.

Updated management for antibody-mediated rejection: opportunity to prolong kidney allograft survival

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is an important barrier to achieve long-term kidney allograft survival. Human leukocyte antibody (HLA)-incompatibility and ABO-incompatibility are the two main mechanisms of ABMR. Nevertheless, the advances in managing ABMR have changed the paradigm for kidney transplantation. This review aimed to emphasize the HLA-incompatibility and ABO-incompatibility kidney transplant and update the management of ABMR.

RECENT FINDINGS

HLA-incompatibility kidney transplantation is a strong risk factor for ABMR. Donor-specific antibody (DSA) is a surrogate biomarker that prevents long-term allograft survival. The standard treatment for ABMR has unfavorable results. New drugs that target the B cell are a promising approach to treat ABMR. In the past, ABO-incompatibility kidney donor was an absolute contraindication but now, it is widely accepted as an alternative organ resource. The advancement of ABO antibody removal and B-cell depletion therapy has been successfully developed. ABO isoagglutination remains the main biomarker for monitoring ABMR during the transplantation process. C4d staining without inflammation of the kidney allograft is the marker for the accommodation process.

SUMMARY

With the shortage of organ donors, transplant experts have expanded the organ resources and learned how to overcome the immunological barriers by using novel biomarkers and developing new treatments that support long-term graft survival.

Outcomes of patients who underwent treatment for anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies before receiving a haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant

Pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who receive many blood product transfusions, such as individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), severe aplastic anemia (SAA) or indolent hematologic malignancies, are at high risk for developing donor-specific antibodies (DSA). DSAs with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) greater than 5000 have been associated with significant graft failure, but lower MFI values between 2000 and 5000 may result in poor graft function after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Desensitization strategies have been developed to reduce the DSA burden in HCT recipients before graft infusion, but the experience with these strategies in the pediatric and AYA populations is not well described in the literature. Here, we describe our experience with successful desensitization by using a combination of treatment strategies in five pediatric and AYA patients, including a novel use of daratumumab in a young adult patient who had refractory DSAs and had suffered serious side effects from conventional desensitization strategies. The presence of elevated DSAs in pediatric and AYA recipients of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched haploidentical HCT can be overcome by a multipronged treatment strategy.

Investigational drugs for the treatment of kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive drug combination therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, namely T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, this potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic, randomized, controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.

Targeting CD38 in Neoplasms and Non-Cancer Diseases

Simple Summary

CD38 remains an interesting target for anticancer therapy. Its relatively high abundance in neoplasms and crucial impact on NAD+/cADPR metabolism and the activity of T cells allows for changing the immune response in autoimmune diseases, neoplasms, and finally the induction of cell death. Antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity is responsible for cell death induced by targeting the tumor with anti-CD38 antibodies, such as daratumumab. A wide range of laboratory experiments and clinical trials show an especially promising role of anti-CD38 therapy against multiple myeloma, NK cell lymphomas, and CD19- B-cell malignancies. More studies are required to include more diseases in the therapeutic protocols involving the modulation of CD38 activity.

Abstract

CD38 is a myeloid antigen present both on the cell membrane and in the intracellular compartment of the cell. Its occurrence is often enhanced in cancer cells, thus making it a potential target in anticancer therapy. Daratumumab and isatuximab already received FDA approval, and novel agents such as MOR202, TAK079 and TNB-738 undergo clinical trials. Also, novel therapeutics such as SAR442085 aim to outrank the older antibodies against CD38. Multiple myeloma and immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis may be effectively treated with anti-CD38 immunotherapy. Its role in other hematological malignancies is also important concerning both diagnostic process and potential treatment in the future. Aside from the hematological malignancies, CD38 remains a potential target in gastrointestinal, neurological and pulmonary system disorders. Due to the strong interaction of CD38 with TCR and CD16 on T cells, it may also serve as the biomarker in transplant rejection in renal transplant patients. Besides, CD38 finds its role outside oncology in systemic lupus erythematosus and collagen-induced arthritis. CD38 plays an important role in viral infections, including AIDS and COVID-19. Most of the undergoing clinical trials focus on the use of anti-CD38 antibodies in the therapy of multiple myeloma, CD19- B-cell malignancies, and NK cell lymphomas. This review focuses on targeting CD38 in cancer and non-cancerous diseases using antibodies, cell-based therapies and CD38 inhibitors. We also provide a summary of current clinical trials targeting CD38.

Emerging drugs for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a focus on phase II & III trials

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. Its therapy continues to be challenge, and no treatment has been approved for the market thus far.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we discuss the pathophysiology and phenotypic presentation of ABMR, the current level of evidence to support the use of available therapeutic strategies, and the emergence of tailored drugs now being evaluated in systematic clinical trials. We searched PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov and Citeline's Pharmaprojects for pertinent information on emerging anti-rejection strategies, laying a focus on phase II and III trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, we rely on the use of apheresis for alloantibody depletion and intravenous immunoglobulin (referred to as standard of care), preferentially in early active ABMR. Recent systematic trials have questioned the benefits of using the CD20 antibody rituximab or the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. However, there are now several promising treatment approaches in the pipeline, which are being trialed in phase II and III studies. These include interleukin-6 antagonism, CD38-targeting antibodies, and selective inhibitors of complement. On the basis of the information that has emerged so far, it seems that innovative treatment strategies for clinical use in ABMR may be available within the next 5-10 years.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of monoclonal CD38 antibody felzartamab in late antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection: study protocol for a phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a cardinal cause of renal allograft loss. This rejection type, which may occur at any time after transplantation, commonly presents as a continuum of microvascular inflammation (MVI) culminating in chronic tissue injury. While the clinical relevance of ABMR is well recognized, its treatment, particularly a long time after transplantation, has remained a big challenge. A promising strategy to counteract ABMR may be the use of CD38-directed treatment to deplete alloantibody-producing plasma cells (PC) and natural killer (NK) cells.

METHODS

This investigator-initiated trial is planned as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center phase 2 trial designed to assess the safety and tolerability (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the fully human CD38 monoclonal antibody felzartamab (MOR202) in late ABMR. The trial will include 20 anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive renal allograft recipients diagnosed with active or chronic active ABMR ≥ 180 days post-transplantation. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive felzartamab (16 mg/kg per infusion) or placebo for a period of 6 months (intravenous administration on day 0, and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks). Two follow-up allograft biopsies will be performed at weeks 24 and 52. Secondary endpoints (preliminary assessment) will include morphologic and molecular rejection activity in renal biopsies, immunologic biomarkers in the blood and urine, and surrogate parameters predicting the progression to allograft failure (slope of renal function; iBOX prediction score).

DISCUSSION

Based on the hypothesis that felzartamab is able to halt the progression of ABMR via targeting antibody-producing PC and NK cells, we believe that our trial could potentially provide the first proof of concept of a new treatment in ABMR based on a prospective randomized clinical trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) 2021-000545-40 . Registered on 23 June 2021.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT05021484 . Registered on 25 August 2021.

Innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: A challenge for unmet needs

Due to the optimal results obtained in kidney transplantation and to the lack of interest of the industries, new innovative drugs in kidney transplantation are difficult to be encountered. The best strategy to find the new drugs recently developed or under development is to search in the sections of kidney transplantation still not completely covered by the drugs on the market. These unmet needs are the prevention of delayed graft function (DGF), the protection of the graft over the long time and the desensitization of preformed anti human leukocyte antigen antibodies and the treatment of the acute antibody-mediated rejection. These needs are particularly relevant due to the expansion of some kind of kidney transplantation as transplantation from non-heart beating donor and in the case of antibody-incompatible grafts. The first are particularly exposed to DGF, the latter need a safe desensitization and a safe treatments of the antibody mediated rejections that often occur. Particular caution is needed in treating these drugs. First, they are described in very recent studies and the follow-up of their effect is of course rather short. Second, some of these drugs are still in an early phase of study, even if in well-conducted randomized controlled trials. Particular caution and a careful check need to be used in trials launched 2 or 3 years ago. Indeed, is always necessary to verify whether the study is still going on or whether and why the study itself was abandoned.

Antibody-removal therapies for de novo DSA in pediatric intestinal recipients: Why, when, and how? A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) impact negatively on the outcome of intestinal grafts. Although the use of antibody-removal therapies (ART) is becoming more frequent in the last few years, issues regarding their timing and effectiveness remain under discussion.

METHODS

In the present study, we report our experience with eight ART procedures (based on plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab) in eight pediatric intestinal and multivisceral transplants with de novo DSA (dnDSA).

RESULTS

ART were performed when dnDSA appeared in two contexts: (1) concomitant with rejection (acute or chronic) or (2) without rejection or any other clinical symptom. Complete DSA removal was observed in seven out of eight patients, showing an effectiveness of 88%. In the group treated for dnDSA without clinical symptoms, the success rate was 100%, with complete DSA removal and without rejection afterward. A shorter time between DSA detection and ART performance appeared as a significant factor for the success of the therapy (p = 0.0002). DSA against HLA-A and DQ alleles were the most resistant to ART, whereas anti-DR DSA were the most sensitive. In addition, the 8-year allograft survival rate in recipients undergoing ART was similar to that in those without DSA, being significantly lower in non-treated DSA-positive recipients (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the effectiveness of ART in terms of DSA removal and allograft survival and encourage its early use even in the absence of clinical symptoms.

Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies

Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.