1
|
Morrison AL, Sarfas C, Sibley L, Williams J, Mabbutt A, Dennis MJ, Lawrence S, White AD, Bodman-Smith M, Sharpe SA. IV BCG Vaccination and Aerosol BCG Revaccination Induce Mycobacteria-Responsive γδ T Cells Associated with Protective Efficacy against M. tb Challenge. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1604. [PMID: 37897006 PMCID: PMC10611416 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11101604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Intravenously (IV) delivered BCG provides superior tuberculosis (TB) protection compared with the intradermal (ID) route in non-human primates (NHPs). We examined how γδ T cell responses changed in vivo after IV BCG vaccination of NHPs, and whether these correlated with protection against aerosol M. tuberculosis challenge. In the circulation, Vδ2 T cell populations expanded after IV BCG vaccination, from a median of 1.5% (range: 0.8-2.3) of the CD3+ population at baseline, to 5.3% (range: 1.4-29.5) 4 weeks after M. tb, and were associated with TB protection. This protection was related to effector and central memory profiles; homing markers; and production of IFN-γ, TNF-α and granulysin. In comparison, Vδ2 cells did not expand after ID BCG, but underwent phenotypic and functional changes. When Vδ2 responses in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were compared between routes, IV BCG vaccination resulted in highly functional mucosal Vδ2 cells, whereas ID BCG did not. We sought to explore whether an aerosol BCG boost following ID BCG vaccination could induce a γδ profile comparable to that induced with IV BCG. We found evidence that the aerosol BCG boost induced significant changes in the Vδ2 phenotype and function in cells isolated from the BAL. These results indicate that Vδ2 population frequency, activation and function are characteristic features of responses induced with IV BCG, and the translation of responses from the circulation to the site of infection could be a limiting factor in the response induced following ID BCG. An aerosol boost was able to localise activated Vδ2 populations at the mucosal surfaces of the lung. This vaccine strategy warrants further investigation to boost the waning human ID BCG response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra L. Morrison
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Charlotte Sarfas
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Laura Sibley
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Jessica Williams
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Adam Mabbutt
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Mike J. Dennis
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Steve Lawrence
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Andrew D. White
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - Mark Bodman-Smith
- Infection and Immunity Research Institute, St. George’s University of London, London SW17 0BD, UK
| | - Sally A. Sharpe
- Vaccine Development and Evaluation Centre, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sanz M, Mann BT, Chitrakar A, Soriano-Sarabia N. Defying convention in the time of COVID-19: Insights into the role of γδ T cells. Front Immunol 2022; 13:819574. [PMID: 36032159 PMCID: PMC9403327 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.819574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 is a complex disease which immune response can be more or less potent. In severe cases, patients might experience a cytokine storm that compromises their vital functions and impedes clearance of the infection. Gamma delta (γδ) T lymphocytes have a critical role initiating innate immunity and shaping adaptive immune responses, and they are recognized for their contribution to tumor surveillance, fighting infectious diseases, and autoimmunity. γδ T cells exist as both circulating T lymphocytes and as resident cells in different mucosal tissues, including the lungs and their critical role in other respiratory viral infections has been demonstrated. In the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, γδ T cell responses are understudied. This review summarizes the findings on the antiviral role of γδ T cells in COVID-19, providing insight into how they may contribute to the control of infection in the mild/moderate clinical outcome.
Collapse
|
3
|
White AD, Sibley L, Sarfas C, Morrison AL, Bewley K, Churchward C, Fotheringham S, Gkolfinos K, Gooch K, Handley A, Humphries HE, Hunter L, Kennard C, Longet S, Mabbutt A, Moffatt M, Rayner E, Tipton T, Watson R, Hall Y, Bodman-Smith M, Gleeson F, Dennis M, Salguero FJ, Carroll M, McShane H, Cookson W, Hopkin J, Sharpe S. Influence of Aerosol Delivered BCG Vaccination on Immunological and Disease Parameters Following SARS-CoV-2 Challenge in Rhesus Macaques. Front Immunol 2022; 12:801799. [PMID: 35222355 PMCID: PMC8863871 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.801799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The tuberculosis vaccine, Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG), also affords protection against non-tuberculous diseases attributable to heterologous immune mechanisms such as trained innate immunity, activation of non-conventional T-cells, and cross-reactive adaptive immunity. Aerosol vaccine delivery can target immune responses toward the primary site of infection for a respiratory pathogen. Therefore, we hypothesised that aerosol delivery of BCG would enhance cross-protective action against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and be a deployable intervention against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Immune parameters were monitored in vaccinated and unvaccinated rhesus macaques for 28 days following aerosol BCG vaccination. High-dose SARS-CoV-2 challenge was applied by intranasal and intrabronchial instillation and animals culled 6–8 days later for assessment of viral, disease, and immunological parameters. Mycobacteria-specific cell-mediated immune responses were detected following aerosol BCG vaccination, but SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular- and antibody-mediated immunity was only measured following challenge. Early secretion of cytokine and chemokine markers associated with the innate cellular and adaptive antiviral immune response was detected following SARS-CoV-2 challenge in vaccinated animals, at concentrations that exceeded titres measured in unvaccinated macaques. Classical CD14+ monocytes and Vδ2 γδ T-cells quantified by whole-blood immunophenotyping increased rapidly in vaccinated animals following SARS-CoV-2 challenge, indicating a priming of innate immune cells and non-conventional T-cell populations. However, viral RNA quantified in nasal and pharyngeal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and tissue samples collected at necropsy was equivalent in vaccinated and unvaccinated animals, and in-life CT imaging and histopathology scoring applied to pulmonary tissue sections indicated that the disease induced by SARS-CoV-2 challenge was comparable between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Hence, aerosol BCG vaccination did not induce, or enhance the induction of, SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive adaptive cellular or humoral immunity, although an influence of BCG vaccination on the subsequent immune response to SARS-CoV-2 challenge was apparent in immune signatures indicative of trained innate immune mechanisms and primed unconventional T-cell populations. Nevertheless, aerosol BCG vaccination did not enhance the initial clearance of virus, nor reduce the occurrence of early disease pathology after high dose SARS-CoV-2 challenge. However, the heterologous immune mechanisms primed by BCG vaccination could contribute to the moderation of COVID-19 disease severity in more susceptible species following natural infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D White
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Sibley
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Sarfas
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra L Morrison
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Bewley
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Churchward
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Susan Fotheringham
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Konstantinos Gkolfinos
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Gooch
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Alastair Handley
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Holly E Humphries
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Hunter
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Chelsea Kennard
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Longet
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Mabbutt
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Moffatt
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Rayner
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Tipton
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Watson
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Yper Hall
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Bodman-Smith
- Infection and Immunity Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fergus Gleeson
- Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Dennis
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Francisco J Salguero
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Miles Carroll
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| | - Helen McShane
- The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - William Cookson
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julian Hopkin
- College of Medicine, Institute of Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Sharpe
- Research and Evaluation, United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|