Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Colitis

Two cases of severe oral mucositis caused by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Atezolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor specific for the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor. In this case report, we describe two cases of oral mucositis that developed following the initiation of a systemic chemotherapy regimen comprising atezolizumab and bevacizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. After 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, each patient presented with mucosal ulcers in the mouth, oral pain, difficulty in speech and oral intake, and both were admitted to our hospital for management. Following rule out of other conditions such as pharyngeal ulcers, herpetic mucositis, denture or oral trauma, or necrotizing mucositis, both patients were diagnosed with oral mucositis as a severe immune-related adverse event. Oral candidiasis was observed in both cases and should be considered a risk factor for the development of oral mucositis. Chemotherapy was discontinued and treatment with prednisolone was started, along with supportive care. The oral mucositis improved, and prednisolone was gradually reduced; however, in one patient, discontinuation of chemotherapy led to a recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. The other patient was lost to follow-up. In patients with risk factors, attention must be paid to the development of oral mucositis during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis, a Rising Issue in Targeted Cancer Therapy Era: A Literature Review

Research advances in the oncology treatment field have led to the widespread use of immunotherapy. The usage of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has improved the survival of cancer patients with metastases. This has also led to the rapidly expanding indications for ICI use. However, ICI usage may lead to toxicity, which may be immune-related, in different organ-specific targets. The immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of ICI may lead to increased morbidity, decreased quality of life, and early termination of ICI. The clinical manifestations of irAEs in the gastrointestinal system are variable, ranging from self-limited to life-threatening or fatal events. In this review article, we would like to focus on discussing ICI-induced colitis, which is one of the most common ICI irAEs in the gastrointestinal tract.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2% to 40%, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesize that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predisposes to IMC. In this study, we first develop a polygenic risk scores for CD (PRSCD) and UC (PRSUC) in cancer-free individuals and then test these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1316 patients with ICI-treated non-small cell lung cancer and perform a replication in 873 ICI-treated pan-cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, the PRSUC predicts all-grade IMC (ORmeta=1.35 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI = 1.12-1.64, P = 2×10-03) and severe IMC (ORmeta=1.49 per SD, 95% CI = 1.18-1.88, P = 9×10-04). PRSCD is not associated with IMC. Furthermore, PRSUC predicts severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (ORmeta=2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P = 0.03). Overall, PRSUC can identify patients receiving ICI at risk of developing IMC and may be useful to monitor patients and improve patient outcomes.

New strategies in the diagnosis and treatment of immune-checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is an increasingly recognized adverse event in cancer immunotherapy, particularly associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibodies. As this revolutionary immunotherapy gains prominence in cancer treatment, understanding, diagnosing, and effectively managing IMC becomes paramount. IMC represents a unique challenge due to its immune-mediated nature and potential for severe complications. However, a precise picture of IMC pathophysiology is currently unavailable. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the existing data while acknowledging the need for further research. This comprehensive review explores the mechanisms underlying ICIs, gastrointestinal adverse effects, and, in particular, IMC's incidence, prevalence, and features. Our review also emphasizes the importance of recognizing IMC's distinct clinical and histopathological features to differentiate it from other forms of colitis. Furthermore, this paper highlights the urgent need for evolving diagnostic methods, therapeutic strategies, and a multidisciplinary approach to effectively manage IMC.

Management of liver and gastrointestinal toxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Position statement of the AEEH-AEG-SEPD-SEOM-GETECCU

The development of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is one of the most remarkable achievements in cancer therapy in recent years. However, their exponential use has led to an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Gastrointestinal and liver events encompass hepatitis, colitis and upper digestive tract symptoms accounting for the most common irAEs, with incidence rates varying from 2 % to 40 %, the latter in patients undergoing combined ICIs therapy. Based on the current scientific evidence derived from both randomized clinical trials and real-world studies, this statement document provides recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the gastrointestinal and hepatic ICI-induced adverse events.

Gut microbiota and clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced cancer

BACKGROUND

There is currently no well-accepted consensus on the association between gut microbiota and the response to treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

Fecal samples were collected before ICI treatment. Gut microbiota was analyzed using 16 S ribosomal RNA sequencing. We investigated the relationship between the α-diversity of fecal microbiota and patients' clinical outcomes. Microbiota profiles from patients and healthy controls were determined. Pre-treatment serum was examined by cytokine array.

RESULTS

We analyzed 74 patients, including 42 with melanoma, 8 with kidney cancer, 13 with lung cancer, and 11 with other cancers. Combination therapy of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 was used in 14 patients, and monotherapy in the rest. Clinical benefit was observed in 35 (47.3 %) cases, including 2 complete responses, 16 partial responses, and 17 stable diseases according to RECIST criteria. No significant difference in α-diversity was found between the benefiter and non-benefiter groups. However, patients with α-diversity within the range of our healthy control had a significantly longer median overall survival (18.9 months), compared to the abnormal group (8.2 months) (p = 0.041, hazard ratio = 0.546) for all patients. The microbiota composition of the benefiters was similar to that of healthy individuals. Furthermore, specific bacteria, such as Prevotella copri and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, were associated with a favorable outcome. We also observed that serum IL-18 before treatment was significantly lower in the benefiters, compared to non-benefiters.

CONCLUSIONS

The α-diversity of gut microbiota is positively correlated with more prolonged overall survival in cancer patients following ICI therapy.

Corticosteroid-resistant immune-related adverse events: a systematic review

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment has become an important therapeutic option for various cancer types. Although the treatment is effective, ICI can overstimulate the patient's immune system, leading to potentially severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis and myocarditis. The initial mainstay of treatments includes the administration of corticosteroids. There is little evidence how to treat steroid-resistant (sr) irAEs. It is mainly based on small case series or single case reports. This systematic review summarizes available evidence about sr-irAEs. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed. Additionally, we included European Society for Medical Oncology, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines for irAEs in our assessment. The study population of all selected publications had to include patients with cancer who developed hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis or myocarditis during or after an immunotherapy treatment and for whom corticosteroid therapy was not sufficient. Our literature search was not restricted to any specific cancer diagnosis. Case reports were also included. There is limited data regarding life-threatening sr-irAEs of colon/liver/lung/heart and the majority of publications are single case reports. Most publications investigated sr colitis (n=26), followed by hepatitis (n=21), pneumonitis (n=17) and myocarditis (n=15). There is most data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to treat sr hepatitis and for infliximab, followed by vedolizumab, to treat sr colitis. Regarding sr pneumonitis there is most data for MMF and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) while data regarding infliximab are conflicting. In sr myocarditis, most evidence is available for the use of abatacept or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (both with or without MMF) or ruxolitinib with abatacept. This review highlights the need for prompt recognition and treatment of sr hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis and myocarditis. Guideline recommendations for sr situations are not defined precisely. Based on our search, we recommend-as first line treatment-(1) MMF for sr hepatitis, (2) infliximab for sr colitis, followed by vedolizumab, (3) MMF and IVIG for sr pneumonitis and (4) abatacept or ATG (both with or without MMF) or ruxolitinib with abatacept for sr myocarditis. These additional immunosuppressive agents should be initiated promptly if there is no sufficient response to corticosteroids within 3 days.

Class II HLA-DRB4 is a predictive biomarker for survival following immunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are important treatment options for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). However, not all patients benefit from ICIs and can experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Limited understanding exists for germline determinants of ICI efficacy and toxicity, but Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) genes have emerged as a potential predictive biomarker. We performed HLA typing on 85 patients with mNSCLC, on ICI therapy and analyzed the impact of HLA Class II genotype on progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and irAEs. Most patients received pembrolizumab (83.5%). HLA-DRB4 genotype was seen in 34/85 (40%) and its presence correlated with improved OS in both univariate (p = 0.022; 26.3 months vs 10.2 months) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.011, HR 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.85]). PFS did not reach significance (univariate, p = 0.12, 8.2 months vs 5.1 months). Eleven patients developed endocrine irAEs. HLA-DRB4 was the predominant genotype among these patients (9/11, 81.8%). Cumulative incidence of endocrine irAEs was higher in patients with HLA-DRB4 (p = 0.0139). Our study is the first to suggest that patients with metastatic NSCLC patients on ICI therapy with HLA-DRB4 genotype experience improved survival outcomes. Patients with HLA-DRB4 had the longest median OS (26.3 months). Additionally, we found a correlation between HLA-DRB4 and the occurrence of endocrine irAEs.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced colitis and arthritis: A case report

RATIONALE

As a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, camrelizumab is used in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. However, a variety of immune-mediated adverse reactions have been reported in a wide range of clinical applications, including immune-related colitis, arthritis, hepatitis, etc.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This 56-year-old male patient experienced diarrhea, bloody stool, and knee pain after receiving camrelizumab for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Colonoscopy showed granular changes in the whole colonic mucosa and blurred or even disappeared vascular texture. Pathology showed chronic inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee joint showed exudative inflammatory changes in bilateral knee joints.

DIAGNOSIS

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis and arthritis.

INTERVENTIONS

Mesalazine oral (extended-release granules, 1000 mg/quarter in die daily). Dexamethasone sodium phosphate (once daily, 5mg in the evening) and compound cypress liquid (once daily, 100ml in the evening) were given by enema. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic treatment of bone pain plaster.

OUTCOMES

The patient had diarrhea reduced to 3 times/day, no more bloody stools, and the knee pain was relieved.

LESSONS

This article describes the cases of immune-related colitis and arthritis caused by camrelizumab, and recommends considering the risk of colitis and arthritis with camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy.

An injectable subcutaneous colon-specific immune niche for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

As a chronic autoinflammatory condition, ulcerative colitis is often managed via systemic immunosuppressants. Here we show, in three mouse models of established ulcerative colitis, that a subcutaneously injected colon-specific immunosuppressive niche consisting of colon epithelial cells, decellularized colon extracellular matrix and nanofibres functionalized with programmed death-ligand 1, CD86, a peptide mimic of transforming growth factor-beta 1, and the immunosuppressive small-molecule leflunomide, induced intestinal immunotolerance and reduced inflammation in the animals' lower gastrointestinal tract. The bioengineered colon-specific niche triggered autoreactive T cell anergy and polarized pro-inflammatory macrophages via multiple immunosuppressive pathways, and prevented the infiltration of immune cells into the colon's lamina propria, promoting the recovery of epithelial damage. The bioengineered niche also prevented colitis-associated colorectal cancer and eliminated immune-related colitis triggered by kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade.

Case Report: A severe case of immunosuppressant-refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis rescued by tofacitinib

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer treatment can give rise to a variety of adverse events. Here we report a male patient with metastatic melanoma who experienced life-threatening colitis and duodenitis following treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab. The patient did not respond to the first three lines of immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroids, infliximab, and vedolizumab), but recovered well after administration of tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor. Cellular and transcriptional data on colon and duodenum biopsies shows significant inflammation in the tissue, characterized by a large number of CD8 T cells and high expression of PD-L1. While cellular numbers do decrease during three lines of immunosuppressive therapy, CD8 T cells remain relatively high in the epithelium, along with PD-L1 expression in the involved tissue and expression of colitis-associated genes, indicating an ongoing colitis at that moment. Despite all immunosuppressive treatments, the patient has an ongoing tumor response with no evidence of disease. Tofacitinib might be a good candidate to consider more often for ipilimumab/nivolumab-induced colitis.

Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis: An Update

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) nowadays has indications for several solid tumors. The current targets for ICIs are CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 receptors. Despite the clinical advantages derived from ICIs, a variety of side effects are linked to overstimulation of the immune system. Among these, ICI-related colitis is one of the most common, with a disabling impact on the patient. Diarrhea, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, cramping, and hematochezia are the most common ICI enterocolitis presenting symptoms. The most frequently used grading system for assessment of the severity of ICI enterocolitis is called the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading. With regard to the histological picture, there is no specific feature; however, microscopic damage can be classified into five types: (1) acute active colitis, (2) chronic active colitis, (3) microscopic colitis-like, (4) graft-versus-host disease-like, and (5) other types. Supportive therapy (oral hydration, a bland diet without lactose or caffeine, and anti-diarrheal agents) is indicated in mild colitis. Symptomatic treatment alone or with loperamide, a low-fiber diet, and spasmolytics are recommended for low-grade diarrhea. In more severe cases, corticosteroid treatment is mandatory. In refractory cases, off-label use of biological therapies (infliximab or vedolizumab) was proposed.

Nivolumab Hypersensitivity Reactions a Myth or Reality in Solid Tumors-A Systematic Review of the Literature

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the most effective treatments nowadays. Nivolumab was the second ICI used for treating solid tumors with amazing results. Patients treated with Nivolumab may react differently to this treatment. Some people tolerate this treatment very well without experiencing any adverse reactions, whilst some may have mild symptoms and a part of them can present severe reactions. In our research, we sought to identify the answers to four questions: 1. what type of cancer has more severe hypersensitivity reactions to Nivolumab, 2. what is the time frame for developing these severe reactions to Nivolumab, 3. whether it is best to continue or stop the treatment after a severe hypersensitivity reaction to Nivolumab and 4. what severe hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequent reported along Nivolumab treatment. This review also highlights another problem with regard to the usage of concomitant and prior medications or other methods of treatment (e.g., radiation therapy), which can also lead to severe reactions. Treatment with Nivolumab is very well tolerated, but patients should also be warned of the possibility of severe hypersensitivity reactions for which they should urgently see a doctor for a personalized evaluation. There are some options for individuals with severe hypersensitivity reactions, for eg. switching the medication or applying a desensitization protocol.

A Case of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Successfully Resumed Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab After Associated Grade 3 Diarrhea and Grade 2 Colitis: Case Report and Literature Review

Systemic chemotherapy has shown a significant survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is associated with various immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We report a case with grade 3 diarrhea and grade 2 colitis following systemic chemotherapy, successfully treated with prednisolone. An 89-year-old man was incidentally detected with a 140-mm hypervascular intrahepatic nodule on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Washout of the contrast medium was also detected, and protein induced by vitamin K deficiency or antagonists-II (PIVKA-II) was elevated. Since the Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade was 2a without any distant metastasis, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was performed to treat the HCC, but several intrahepatic nodules were seen in both lobes. Therefore, the patient was treated with lenvatinib for 1 year and 4 months. A complete response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria was achieved in 2 months; however, multiple hypervascular nodules were detected again. Since the ALBI grade was 1, a second round of chemotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab was initiated. Although a complete response was achieved, the therapy was discontinued due to grade 3 diarrhea and grade 2 colitis after the sixth course. Based on the stool analysis and culture, CECT, and colonoscopy, the diagnosis was atezolizumab-associated colitis. Diarrhea was controlled following the oral administration of 0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisolone, and atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy was successfully reinitiated without recurrence of colitis. The management of irAEs is important for a significant survival benefit. Systemic chemotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab can be resumed despite a grade 3 irAE due to atezolizumab.

Imaging Effector Memory T-Cells Predicts Response to PD1-Chemotherapy Combinations in Colon Cancer

Often, patients fail to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment despite favourable biomarker status. Numerous chemotherapeutic agents have been shown to promote tumour immunogenicity when used in conjunction with ICIs; however, little is known about whether such combination therapies lead to a lasting immune response. Given the potential toxicity of ICI–chemotherapy combinations, identification of biomarkers that accurately predict how individuals respond to specific treatment combinations and whether these responses will be long lasting is of paramount importance. In this study, we explored [18F]AlF-NOTA-KCNA3P, a peptide radiopharmaceutical that targets the Kv1.3 potassium channel overexpressed on T-effector memory (TEM) cells as a PET imaging biomarker for lasting immunological memory response. The first-line colon cancer chemotherapies oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil were assessed in a syngeneic colon cancer model, either as monotherapies or in combination with PD1, comparing radiopharmaceutical uptake to memory-associated immune cells in the tumour. [18F]AlF-NOTA-KCNA3P reliably separated tumours with immunological memory responses from non-responding tumours and could be used to measure Kv1.3-expressing TEM cells responsible for durable immunological memory response to combination therapy in vivo.

Mechanisms of dermatologic toxicities to immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapies

The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) sparked a revolution in the era of targeted anticancer therapy. While monoclonal antibodies targeting the CTLA-4 and PD-1 axes have improved survival in patients with advanced cancers, these immunotherapies are associated with a wide spectrum of dermatologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Several publications have addressed the clinical and histopathologic classification of these skin-directed irAEs, their impact on antitumor immunity and survival, and the critical role of supportive oncologic dermatology in their management. Here, we review the current understanding of the mechanistic drivers of immune-related skin toxicities with a focus on inflammatory, immunobullous, melanocyte/pigment-related reactions. We detail the specific immune-based mechanisms that may underlie different cutaneous reactions. We also discuss potential mechanisms as they relate to non-cutaneous irAEs and potential overlap with cutaneous irAEs, techniques to study differences in immune-related versus de novo skin reactions, and how treatment of these adverse events impacts cancer treatment, patient quality of life, and overall survival. An improved understanding of the mechanistic basis of cutaneous irAEs will allow us to develop and utilize blood-based biomarkers that could help ultimately predict onset and/or severity of these irAEs and to implement rational mechanistic-based treatment strategies that are targeted to the irAEs while potentially avoiding abrogating anti-tumor effect of ICIs.

Based on Molecular Subtypes, Immune Characteristics and Genomic Variation to Constructing and Verifying Multi-Gene Prognostic Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer

Background: Colon cancer (COAD) has been identified as being among the most prevalent tumors globally and ranked the third major contributor to cancer-related mortality. COAD is a molecularly heterogeneous disease. There are great differences in clinical manifestations and prognosis among different molecular subtypes.

Methods:379 TCGA-COAD samples were divided into four subtypes: primary proliferative, with collective, crypt-like, and EMT invasion. The differences among the four subtypes were analyzed from the multidimensional perspectives of immunity, genomic variation, and prognosis. The limma package was utilized to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) amongst different molecular subtypes. Phenotype-related coexpressed gene modules were identified using WGCNA. The polygenic prognosis model was created utilizing the lasso Cox analysis and verified by time-dependent subject operating characteristics (ROC).

Results: There are some differences in prognosis, TMB and common gene variation, immune score, and immunotherapy/chemotherapy between proliferative and three invasive molecular subtypes. 846 differential genes (DEGs) were obtained by limma packet analysis. Differential gene analysis was utilized to screen the DEGs among distinct subtypes, which were significantly enriched in the pathways related to tumorigenesis and development. Co-expression network analysis found 46 co-expressed genes correlated with proliferative and three invasive phenotypes. Based on differentially co-expressed genes, we developed a prognostic risk model of 8-genes signature, which exhibited strong stability regardless of external and internal validation. RT-PCR experiments proved the expression of eight genes in tumor and normal samples.

Conclusion: We have developed an eight-gene signature prognostic stratification system. Furthermore, we proposed that this classifier can serve as a molecular diagnostic tool to assess the prognosis of colon cancer patients.