Identification of a Novel Immune Landscape Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Response of Colon Cancer to Immunotherapy

Canopy FGF signaling regulator 3 affects prognosis, immune infiltration, and PI3K/AKT pathway in colon adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is a malignant tumor of the digestive system. The mechanisms underlying COAD development and progression are still largely unknown.

AIM

To identify the role of canopy FGF signaling regulator 3 (CNPY3) in the development and progression of COAD by using bioinformatic tools and functional experiments.

METHODS

Bioinformatic data were downloaded from public databases. The associations of clinicopathological features, survival, and immune function with the expression of CNPY3 were analyzed. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis were used to explore the related pathways. Then, quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry were used for validation of CNPY3 expression in clinical samples and tumor cell lines. Cell lines with CNPY3 knockdown were constructed to further analyze gene functions. The functional experiments included proliferation, invasion, migration and apoptosis assays.

RESULTS

In both the TCGA cohort and the merged dataset, elevated CNPY3 expression was observed in tumor tissues. High CNPY3 expression correlated with adverse survival and compromised immune functions. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that the pro-oncogenic properties of CNPY3 might be linked to the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. CNPY3 expression was validated at both the RNA and protein levels. Functional assays indicated that cell proliferation, invasion, and migration were inhibited and cell apoptosis was promoted after CNPY3 knockdown. Additionally, Western blot results revealed the downregulation of key proteins in the PI3K/AKT pathway following CNPY3 knockdown. PI3K/AKT pathway activator reversed the decrease in proliferation, invasion, and migration and the increase in apoptosis. Notably, CNPY3 knockdown still affected the cells when the pathway was inhibited.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that CNPY3 is upregulated in COAD and might regulate COAD development and progression by the PI3K/AKT pathway. Thus, CNPY3 might be a promising therapeutic target.

Porphyromonas gingivalis induced UCHL3 to promote colon cancer progression

Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), a Gram-negative oral anaerobe, was demonstrated to facilitate colonization and progression in colonic tumor, while the underlying mechanism still remains to be clarified. Here, we identified the proteome profile changed by P. gingivalis infection in HCT116 cells through label-free quantitative proteomics, and found that deubiquitinase UCHL3 was a key protein that response for P. gingivalis infection. By CCK8, colony formation, wound healing assays, and in vivo subcutaneous tumor mouse moudle, we proved that P. gingivalis could promote the proliferation and migration of colon cancer, while the process was inhibited by UCHL3 knock down. Through IP-MS, we identified GNG12 as the UCHL3 interacting protein. The protein level of GNG12 was significantly reduced when knock out UCHL3. Thus we propose that GNG12 is a substrate protein of UCHL3. Furthermore, we demonstrated that overexpression of GNG12 could restore the tumor inhibition effect caused by UCHL3 knock down, and UCHL3-GNG12 axis promote colon cancer progression via the NF-κB signal pathway. Collectively, this study unveiled that P. gingivalis infection up-regulated UCHL3 and stabilized its substrate protein GNG12 to activate the NF-κB signal pathway to promote colon cancer progression. Our study indicate that UCHL3 is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for colon cancer which infected with P. gingivalis.

A potential novel biomarker: comprehensive analysis of prognostic value and immune implication of CES3 in colonic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Colon cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the intestine. Abnormal Carboxylesterases 3 (CES3) expression had been reported to be correlated to multiple tumor progression. However, the association among CES3 expression and prognostic value and immune effects in colonic adenocarcinoma (COAD) were unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The transcription and expression data of CES3 and corresponding clinical information was downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The CES3 protein expression and the prognostic value were verified based on tissue microarray data. The Cancer immune group Atlas (TCIA), Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) algorithm and the GSE78220 immunotherapy cohort were used to forecast immunotherapy efficacy. Finally, a prognostic immune signature was constructed and verified.

RESULTS

Compared with normal colon tissues, the expression of mRNA and protein levels of CES3 were downregulated in tumor tissues. CES3 expression was associated with TIICs. Hihg-CES3 COAD patients had better efficacy of concurrent immunotherapy. CES3-related immune genes (CRIs) were identified and were then used to construct prognostic immune signature and had been successfully verified in GES39582.

CONCLUSION

CES3 might be a potential immune-related gene and promising prognostic biomarker in COAD.

Comparative analyses of the prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment, and drug treatment response between left-sided and right-sided colon cancer by integrating scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data

BACKGROUND

In this study, we compared the prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment (TIM), and drug treatment response between left-sided (LCC) and right-sided (RCC) colon cancer to predict outcomes in patients with LCC and RCC.

METHODS

Based on identified differentially expressed genes and using single-cell RNA sequencing data, we constructed and validated a prognostic model for LCC and RCC patients in the TCGA-COAD cohort and GSE103479 cohort. Moreover, we compared the differences of TIM characteristics and drug treatment response between LCC and RCC patients.

RESULTS

We constructed and validated a five-gene prognostic model for LCC patients and a four-gene prognostic model for RCC patients, and both showed excellent performance. The RCC patients with higher risk scores were significantly associated with greater metastasis (P = 2.6×10-5), N stage (P = 0.012), advanced pathological stage (P = 1.4×10-4), and more stable microsatellite status (P = 0.007) but not T stage (P = 0.200). For LCC patients, the risk scores were not significantly associated with tumor stage and microsatellite status (P > 0.05). Additionally, immune infiltration by CD8 and regulatory T cells and M0, M1, and M2 macrophages differed significantly between LCC and RCC patients (P < 0.05). APC and TP53 mutations were significantly more common in LCC patients (P < 0.05). In contrast, KRAS, SYNE1, and MUC16 mutations were significantly more common in RCC patients (P < 0.05). In addition, tumor mutation burden values were significantly higher in RCC patients than in LCC patients (P = 5.9×10-8). Moreover, the expression of immune checkpoint targets was significantly higher in RCC patients than in LCC patients (P < 0.05), indicating that RCC patients maybe more sensitive to immunotherapy. However, LCC and RCC patients did not differ significantly in their sensitivity to eight selected chemicals or target drugs (P > 0.05). The average half-maximal inhibitory concentrations for camptothecin, teniposide, vinorelbine, and mitoxantrone were significantly lower in low-risk than in high-risk RCC patients (P < 0.05), indicating that the lower risk score of RCC patients, the more sensitive they were to these four drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

We investigated the differences in prognosis, TIM, and drug treatment response between LCC and RCC patients, which may contribute to accurate colon cancer prognosis and treatment of colon cancer.

Exploring the prognostic function of TMB-related prognostic signature in patients with colon cancer

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) level is identified as a useful predictor in multiple tumors including colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). However, the function of TMB related genes has not been explored previously. In this study, we obtained patients' expression and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). TMB genes were screened and subjected to differential expression analysis. Univariate Cox and LASSO analyses were utilized to construct the prognostic signature. The efficiency of the signature was tested by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A nomogram was further plotted to assess the overall survival (OS) time of patients with COAD. In addition, we compared the predictive performance of our signature with other four published signatures. Functional analyses indicated that patients in the low-risk group have obviously different enrichment of tumor related pathways and tumor infiltrating immune cells from that of high-risk patients. Our findings suggested that the ten genes' prognostic signature could exert undeniable prognostic functions in patients with COAD, which might provide significant clues for the development of personalized management of these patients.

Successful treatment of breast metastasis from primary transverse colon cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colon cancer is increasing worldwide. Treatments for colon cancer include surgery and surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but the median survival rate is still poor. Colon cancer most commonly metastasizes to the lymph nodes, lungs, liver, peritoneum, and brain, but breast metastasis is rare. There is no agreement on its treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 23-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital for further treatment with a history of acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Her physical examination and computed tomography scan revealed an abdominal tumor. Transverse colectomy was successfully performed. Histopathological examination revealed that the tumor was a mucosecretory adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells. The patient inadvertently found a mass in the outer upper quadrant of the right breast after four cycles of XELOX chemotherapy [oxaliplatin 130 mg/m², d1, intravenous (iv) drip for 2 h; capecitabine 1000 mg/m², po, bid, d1–d14]. After discussion with the patient, we performed a lumpectomy and frozen biopsy. The latter revealed that the breast tumor was intestinal metastasis. Genetic testing showed wild-type RAS and BRAF. So we replaced the original chemotherapy with FOLFIRI [irinotecan 180 mg/m², d1, iv drip for 3–90 min; leucovorin 400 mg/m², d1, iv drip for 2 h; 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m², d1 and 5-FU 1200 mg/(m² d) × 2 d, continuous iv drip for 46–48 h] + cetuximab (500 mg/m², d1, iv drip for 2 h). Serum levels of tumor markers returned to normal after several treatment cycles, and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Breast metastasis from colon cancer is rare. Radical breast surgery should be avoided unless needed for palliation. Chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy should be the first choice.