Patterns of Recurrent Thrombosis in Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Multicenter, Real-Life Long-Term Follow-Up

Identification of common MicroRNAs expression signatures in antiphospholipid syndrome and thromboembolic disease: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by distinct pathophysiological mechanisms leading to heterogeneous manifestations, including venous and arterial thrombosis. Despite the lack of specific markers of thrombosis risk in APS, some of the mechanisms responsible for thrombosis in APS may overlap with those of other thromboembolic diseases. Understanding these similarities is important for improving the assessment of thrombosis risk in APS. MicroRNAs (MiRNAs) are RNA molecules that regulate gene expression and may influence the autoimmune response and coagulation.

PURPOSE

In this scoping review we aimed to investigate shared miRNAs profiles associated with APS and other thromboembolic diseases as a means of identifying markers indicative of a pro-thrombotic profile among patients with APS.

DATA COLLECTION AND RESULTS

Through a comprehensive search of scientific databases, 45 relevant studies were identified out of 1020 references. miRs-124-3p, 125b-5p, 125a-5p, and 17-5p, were associated with APS and arterial thrombosis, while miRs-106a-5p, 146b-5p, 15a-5p, 222-3p, and 451a were associated with APS and venous thrombosis. Additionally, miR-126a-3p was associated with APS and both arterial and venous thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

We observed that APS shares a common miRNAs signature with non-APS related thrombosis, suggesting that miRNA expression profiles may serve as markers of thrombotic risk in APS. Further validation of a pro-thrombotic miRNA signature in APS is warranted to improve risk assessment, diagnosis, and management of APS.

Risk Factors for Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Persistence of serum antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) is associated with a high thrombotic risk, both arterial and venous, and with pregnancy complications. Due to the potential morbidity and mortality associated with the presence of aPL, identifying and recognizing risk factors for the development of aPL and thrombosis in aPL carriers may help to prevent and reduce the burden of disease. Multiple elements are involved in the pathomechanism of aPL development and aPL-related thrombosis such as genetics, malignancy, and infections. This review will address the role of both well-known risk factors and their evolution, and of emerging risk factors, including COVID-19, in the development of aPL and thrombosis in aPL carriers.

Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and a first venous or arterial thrombotic event: clinical characteristics, antibody profiles and estimate of the risk of recurrence

OBJECTIVES

Thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) involves in most cases the venous circulation. Why in some patients thrombotic APS affects the arterial circulation and in particular cerebral circulation is unknown. In previous studies, both patient characteristics and antiphospholipid antibody types and titers have been associated with arterial thrombosis. Aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of venous and arterial thrombotic APS from a large series of patients.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the Start 2 antiphospholipid, a multicenter prospective register of long-term collected data from Thrombosis Centers in Italy.

RESULTS

Of 167 patients with thrombotic APS, 114 (68 %) had a venous and 53 (32 %) had an arterial event as first clinical manifestation. Several clinical characteristics and risk factors were different among groups in univariate analysis. Using logistic regression analysis, reduced creatinine clearance and hyperlipidemia were independent variable for the occurrence of arterial APS. Notably, no difference in antiphospholipid antibody profiles and aβ2-Glycoprotein I levels were found between groups. A higher adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) was found in arterial group indicating a possible high recurrence rate in arterial APS.

CONCLUSIONS

These data have pathophysiological and clinical implication since associated conditions might predispose patients to arterial rather than venous events and call to a close monitoring and treatment of arterial APS due to their increased tendency to recurrence.

Risks Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Antiphospholipid Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is recognized as a thrombophilic autoimmune condition characterized by a tendency to develop venous thromboembolism. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a prevalent procedure in patients who have advanced knee arthritis. Notably, TKA is unequivocally considered a thrombotic risk factor. However, outcomes of APS patients after TKA are still poorly documented in literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate APS as a potential risk factor for complications after TKA.

METHODS

Using the PearlDiver Mariner database from 2010 to 2022, APS patients undergoing primary TKA were identified and compared to 10:1 matched control based on age, sex, and relevant comorbidities. A total of 7,478 patients undergoing primary TKA were analyzed, of which 683 had APS. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were done for medical complications up to 90 days and surgical complications including revision up to 2 years. Ninety-day emergency department visit and inpatient readmission were also documented.

RESULTS

Within 90 days after TKA, patients who have APS exhibited higher rates of cerebrovascular accident (adjusted odds ratio 2.04, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 3.57; P = .014) and deep vein thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.99 to 4.06; P < .001) as compared to matched controls. No difference in surgical or nonthrombotic medical complications was observed between 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significantly higher rates of stroke and deep vein thrombosis in APS patients. Our study did not find statistical differences in other surgical complications or readmissions between the 2 groups. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider appropriate prophylaxis of thrombosis in this patient population undergoing TKA perioperatively.

Heart valve disease in primary antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVES

APS-associated heart valve disease (HVD) is well described. Nonetheless, limited data exist on clinical parameters associated with the course of primary APS (pAPS) patients with HVD. The goal of this study was to assess clinical features and related outcomes in patients with APS-associated HVD.

METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective study, we identified 33 pAPS patients with HVD (pAPS-HVD group) and compared their clinical course with 128 pAPS patients with normal heart valves on echocardiography (pAPS-control group).

RESULTS

pAPS-HVD patients had more cerebrovascular events (56.3% vs 25%, P = 0.005) and livedo reticularis (24.2% vs 7.8%, P = 0.013) than pAPS-controls. Furthermore, catastrophic-APS (CAPS) (12.1% vs 2.4%, P = 0.034), recurrent thrombosis (33.3% vs 4.7%, P < 0.001) and need for advanced therapy (i.e. IVIG, plasmapheresis or rituximab) were more frequent in pAPS-HVD patients. Anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 IgG (84.8% vs 63.2%, P = 0.034), anti-cardiolipin IgG (90.9% vs 64.8%, P = 0.005) and triple positive aPL (75.8% vs 56.5%, P = 0.047) were commoner in pAPS-HVD patients vs pAPS-controls. Ten of the 33 patients with pAPS-HVD underwent valve surgery, which was associated with male gender, smoking, arterial limb ischaemia and livedo reticularis.

CONCLUSION

pAPS-HVD patients had a more severe APS clinical course including CAPS and thrombotic events as well as a specific serology, namely IgG isotype aPL antibodies and triple positivity. Our data suggest that pAPS-HVD represents a high-risk subgroup of APS patients.

Four clinical and biological phenotypes in antiphospholipid syndrome: a cluster analysis of 174 patients with antinuclear antibody tests

Introduction

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune thrombotic disease with various systemic presentations. This study aimed to identify homogeneous groups of patients based on a non-supervised hierarchical cluster analysis and assess the rate of relapse associated with antinuclear antibodies (ANA).

Methods

This retrospective observational study enrolled patients, over a 90-month period, who had APS as defined by the 2006 Sydney classification criteria, and for whom ANA workup was performed. Agglomerative unsupervised hierarchical clustering was conducted to classify patients into subgroups using 24 variables reflecting a range of clinical and biological baseline features associated with APS.

Results

Hundred and seventy-four patients were included and were categorized into four phenotypes. Cluster 1 (n=73) associated mostly middle-aged men with risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Obstetrical APS with low-risk thrombosis made up cluster 2 (n=25). Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), microvascular findings and double/triple positive APL antibodies (50%) were represented in cluster 3 (n=33). Whereas cluster 4 (n=43) characterized a predominantly female subpopulation with positive ANA and systemic lupus (n=23) that exhibited a high thrombotic risk and more frequent relapses (n=38) (p<0.001).

Conclusions

This study identified four homogenous groups of patients with APS listed as: i) cardiovascular and arterial risk, ii) obstetrical, iii) VTE and microvascular, and iv) ANA-positive APS. We found that ANA-positivity was associated with higher rates of relapse. Applying ANA status to classification criteria could constitute a novel approach to tailoring management for APS, based on phenotypic patterns and risk assessment.

Criteria and Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: How Strong Are They Correlated?

The place of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is still debatable. The aim of this research was to evaluate the correlations between the titres of non-criteria aPLs (anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), anti-phosphatidylserine (aPS), and anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies), and the ones of the already studied criteria aPLs (anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I-aβ2GPI antibodies). Altogether, 72 APS (30 primary and 42 secondary) patients were included in our study. High correlation coefficients (rs) were found between aPS IgM and aCL IgM, overall (0.77, p < 0.01), as well as in the primary (0.81, p < 0.01), and secondary (0.75, p < 0.01) APS subgroups. Low or statistically insignificant correlations were observed between IgG/IgM isotypes of aPT and aCL, or aβ2GPI, in the entire study population, and when evaluating the subgroups. Therefore, moderate correlations were mainly identified between the tested non-criteria antibodies and the criteria ones, suggesting little added value for the use of the tested non-criteria aPLs, with the exception of aPT, which seems to have different kinetics and might be a promising APS diagnostic tool.

Validation of three prediction models for thrombosis recurrence in antiphospholipid syndrome patients based on a prospective cohort

OBJECTIVES

To validate the performance of the adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) score (aGAPSS), Padua score and Caprini score to predict thrombosis recurrence in APS.

METHODS

Consecutive thrombotic-APS patients were included. aGAPSS, Padua and Caprini score at baseline were collected. Harrell c-index and calibration curve were used to validate the prediction models.

RESULTS

362 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 36.30±13.88 years old, and 209 (57.7%) were female. Patients were followed up for a median of 2.32 years, with 32 (8.84%) venous and 21 (5.80%) arterial thrombosis. The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year thrombosis risks were 5.0%, 14.3% and 17.9%, respectively. The Harrell c-indexes of aGAPSS, Padua and Caprini score were 0.54 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.64), 0.54 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.62), and 0.50 (95%CI 0.42 to 0.58), respectively. Padua score had the best discrimination to predict venous thrombosis (Harrell c-index=0.61, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.69). aGAPSS had the best discrimination to predict arterial thrombosis (Harrell c-index=0.61, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.75). The calibrations for predicting thrombosis within 1, 3 and 5 years of the three models were suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

The performance of aGAPSS, Padua and Caprini score to predict thrombosis recurrence in APS were suboptimal. Arterial and venous thrombosis recurrence predictors were different. New prediction models are required for venous and arterial thrombosis separately.

Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the persistent positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) together with thrombosis or obstetrical complications. Despite their recognized predominant role, aPLA are not sufficient to induce the development of thrombosis and a second hit has been proposed to be necessary. The mainstay of treatment of APS is anticoagulant therapy. However, its optimal intensity in different presentations of the disease remains undefined. Moreover, decision on which patients with aPLA would benefit from an antithrombotic prophylaxis and its optimal intensity are challenging because of the lack of stratification tools for the risk of thrombosis. Finally, decision on the optimal type of anticoagulant drug is also complex because the central pathway responsible for the development of thrombosis is so far unknown and should be carried out on an individual basis after a careful evaluation of the clinical and laboratory features of the patient. This review addresses the epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and management of thrombosis and obstetrical complications in APS, with a special focus on the role of direct oral anticoagulants.