1
|
De Weerdt L, Herzog SA, Van Damme P, Maertens K. Timing of pertussis vaccination during pregnancy: Evidence and implementation - A systematic review. Vaccine 2024; 42:126152. [PMID: 39088988 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.07.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy has been introduced in an increasing number of countries to better protect infants against the disease in their first weeks of life. The optimal timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy is however still under debate. METHODS We systematically reviewed published literature on safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy related to timing of vaccination. The search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science and yielded 1623 articles, thereof 777 duplicates. Screening resulted in the inclusion of 45 publications reporting on safety (n = 11), immunogenicity (n = 26) and/or effectiveness (n = 9). We also mapped pertussis recommendations in pregnancy by government institutions globally according to the recommended timing of vaccination. RESULTS Overall, the selected publications did not indicate increased safety concerns associated with timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. Immunogenicity studies often suggested optimal protection at birth after early third trimester vaccination. Few studies investigated qualitative antibody characteristics, and none investigated antibody titers in breastmilk or cellular-mediated immunity related to timing of vaccination. Effectiveness studies showed decreased vaccine effectiveness of late third trimester pertussis vaccination compared to vaccination earlier in pregnancy. Worldwide, a general recommendation for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy was found for 58 countries, with as many as 22 different recommended timings registered. CONCLUSION The timing of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy seems to impact immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness, with optimal immune responses at birth suggested following early third trimester vaccination and reduced vaccine effectiveness of late third trimester pertussis vaccination suggested compared to vaccination earlier in pregnancy. However, inconsistent and lacking data are reflected in the divergent national recommendations for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy worldwide. SUMMARY Pertussis vaccination in pregnancy aims to protect infants in their first weeks of life. Our review suggests that immunogenicity and vaccine effectiveness are impacted by the timing of vaccination in pregnancy. National recommendations for pertussis vaccination in pregnancy vary widely worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise De Weerdt
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Sereina A Herzog
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Immink MM, Bekker MN, de Melker HE, den Hartog G, Rots NY, van Gageldonk PGM, Groenendaal F, Sanders EAM, van der Maas NAT. Maternal Pertussis Immunization and Immunoglobulin G Levels in Early- to Late-Term and Preterm Infants. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2424608. [PMID: 39078627 PMCID: PMC11289700 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination protects newborns against severe pertussis. Data on transplacental antibody transfer on Tdap vaccination before 24 weeks' gestation remain scarce and are particularly relevant for preterm infants to increase the time interval for maternal antibody transfer. Objective To assess noninferiority of anti-pertussis toxin (anti-PT) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels at age 2 months in early- to late-term infants following Tdap vaccination between 20 0/7 and 24 0/7 weeks' gestation compared with 30 0/7 and 33 0/7 weeks' gestation and compared with preterm infants. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter cohort study included pregnant women aged 18 years or older in birthing centers and hospitals in the Netherlands between August 2019 and November 2021 who received Tdap vaccination between 20 0/7 and 24 0/7 weeks' gestation. Women with imminent premature birth were recruited if they had received maternal Tdap vaccination between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation. Blood samples were collected from mothers at delivery, from the umbilical cord, and from infants at age 2 months. Data from infants' blood samples at age 2 months were compared with a reference cohort (recruited between January 2014 and February 2016) of early- to late-term infants of the same age whose mothers had received Tdap vaccination between 30 0/7 and 33 0/7 weeks' gestation. Exposure Maternal Tdap vaccination between 20 0/7 and 24 0/7 weeks' gestation or 30 0/7 and 33 0/7 weeks' gestation. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-PT IgG antibodies in early- to late-term infants (≥37 0/7 weeks' gestation) at age 2 months, comparing maternal Tdap vaccination between 20 0/7 and 24 0/7 weeks' vs 30 0/7 and 33 0/7 weeks' gestation (reference cohort). Anti-PT GMC in 2-month-old infants born preterm (<35 0/7 weeks' gestation) compared with early- to late-term infants after maternal Tdap vaccination between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation was a secondary outcome. Results In total, 221 women who delivered 239 offspring were enrolled in the study; 66 early- to late-term infants (median gestational age [GA], 40.6 weeks [IQR, 39.8-41.0 weeks]; 38 [57.6%] male) and 73 preterm infants (median GA, 32.1 weeks [IQR, 29.5-33.0 weeks]; 42 [54.5%] female) had blood samples collected at 2 months of age. Anti-PT GMC was 14.7 IU/mL (95% CI, 10.6-20.4 IU/mL) in early- to late-term infants following maternal Tdap vaccination between 20 0/7 and 24 0/7 weeks' gestation compared with 27.3 IU/mL (95% CI, 20.1-37.1 IU/mL) in 55 infants in the reference group (median GA, 40.3 [IQR, 39.1-41.0]; 33 [60.0%] female). The mean anti-PT GMC in preterm infants in the study group was 11.2 IU/mL (95% CI, 8.1-15.3 IU/mL) (P = .23 compared with early- to late-term infants). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, 2-month-old preterm and early- to late-term infants showed significantly lower anti-PT antibody levels following maternal Tdap vaccination between 20 0/7 and 24 0/7 weeks' gestation compared with 30 0/7 and 33 0/7 weeks' gestation; preterm and early- to late-term infants had similar anti-PT antibody levels, but both groups showed significantly lower antibody levels compared with the reference group. Epidemiological research should investigate whether maternal Tdap vaccination before 24 weeks' gestation provides sufficient protection against clinical pertussis, particularly in preterm infants, as long as no correlate of protection is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten M. Immink
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mireille N. Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hester E. de Melker
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Gerco den Hartog
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke Y. Rots
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter G. M. van Gageldonk
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Floris Groenendaal
- Department of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A. M. Sanders
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline A. T. van der Maas
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sereme Y, Toumi E, Saifi E, Faury H, Skurnik D. Maternal immune factors involved in the prevention or facilitation of neonatal bacterial infections. Cell Immunol 2024; 395-396:104796. [PMID: 38104514 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2023.104796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Newborns, whether born prematurely or at term, have a fully formed but naive immune system that must adapt to the extra-uterine environment to prevent infections. Maternal immunity, transmitted through the placenta and breast milk, protects newborns against infections, primarily via immunoglobulins (IgG and IgA) and certain maternal immune cells also known as microchimeric cells. Recently, it also appeared that the maternal gut microbiota played a vital role in neonatal immune maturation via microbial compounds impacting immune development and the establishment of immune tolerance. In this context, maternal vaccination is a powerful tool to enhance even more maternal and neonatal health. It involves the transfer of vaccine-induced antibodies to protect both mother and child from infectious diseases. In this work we review the state of the art on maternal immune factors involved in the prevention of neonatal bacterial infections, with particular emphasis on the role of maternal vaccination in protecting neonates against bacterial disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssouf Sereme
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Eya Toumi
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Estelle Saifi
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Helène Faury
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France; Department of Microbiology, Necker Hospital, University de Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Skurnik
- Université Paris Cité, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, F-75015 Paris, France; Department of Microbiology, Necker Hospital, University de Paris, Paris, France; FHU PREMA, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ghalandari N, Immink MM, Röder E, Bruijning-Verhagen PCJ, Smeele H, Crijns H, van der Maas NAT, Bekker MN, Sanders EAM, Dolhain RJEM. Maternal and neonatal antibody levels on pertussis vaccination in pregnant women on immune-modulating therapy for rheumatic disease. RMD Open 2023; 9:e002985. [PMID: 37640516 PMCID: PMC10462940 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-002985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While protection against pertussis following maternal tetanus-diphtheria-and-acellular-pertussis (Tdap) vaccination was demonstrated in healthy term-born infants, no evidence is available on Tdap vaccination in combination with immune-modulating therapy during pregnancy. In this pilot study, we explored whether treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFis) in pregnant patients with rheumatic disease interferes with Tdap vaccine responses and affects maternal anti-pertussis IgG antibody levels in newborns. METHODS Patients were included by a rheumatologist during pregnancy in case they received maternal Tdap vaccination in the late-second or early-third trimester of pregnancy. Blood samples were obtained from mothers during the first pregnancy trimester, 3 months after delivery and from the umbilical cord. IgG antibody levels against Tdap-included antigens were measured using a bead-based multiplex immunoassay. Findings on patients exposed to TNFis were compared with those from TNFi-unexposed patients and with data from a historical comparator study among healthy Tdap vaccinated mother-infant pairs (n=53). RESULTS 66 patients (46 exposed and 20 unexposed to TNFIs) were enrolled. No major differences in IgG antibody levels were observed between TNFi-exposed and unexposed mothers before maternal Tdap vaccination and 3 months after delivery. In cord sera, however, antibody levels against pertussis toxin were significantly lower after TNFi-treatment (35.94 IU/mL, 95% CI 20.68 to 62.45) compared with no TNFi-treatment of mothers with rheumatic disease (94.61 IU/mL, 95% CI 48.89 to 183.07) and lower compared with a cohort of healthy mothers (125.12 IU/mL, 95% CI 90.75 to 172.50). We observed similar differences for filamentous haemagglutinin, pertactin, tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid. CONCLUSION These preliminary data indicate no major differences in IgG antibody levels on maternal Tdap vaccination in pregnant women with or without immune-modulating treatment, although our findings suggest that TNFis during pregnancy induce lower maternal anti-pertussis-specific protective antibody levels in newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafise Ghalandari
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten M Immink
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Esther Röder
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patricia C J Bruijning-Verhagen
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hieronymus Smeele
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Nicoline A T van der Maas
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Álvarez García FJ, Cilleruelo Ortega MJ, Álvarez Aldeán J, Garcés-Sánchez M, Garrote Llanos E, Iofrío de Arce A, Montesdeoca Melián A, Navarro Gómez ML, Pineda Solas V, Rivero Calle I, Ruiz-Contreras J, Serrano Marchuet P. Immunisation schedule of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics: 2023 Recommendations. An Pediatr (Barc) 2023; 98:58.e1-58.e10. [PMID: 36599520 DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
As it does every year, the CAV-AEP publishes the update of its recommendations for the use of vaccines in children, adolescents and pregnant women residing in Spain. The 2 + 1 schedule is maintained in infants (at 2, 4 and 11 months), including preterm infants, with the hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HB) and the pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine. A booster dose with DTaP-IPV is needed at 6 years for those who received the 2 + 1 series with hexavalent vaccine as infants, in addition to 1 dose of dTap in adolescence. Routine vaccination of pregnant women with a dose of dTap is recommended in each pregnancy, preferably between weeks 27 and 32 of gestation, although can be given from 20 weeks if there is risk of preterm delivery. All infants should receive the rotavirus vaccine (2-3 doses) and the 4CMenB vaccine (2 + 1 series). All children aged 6-59 months should be vaccinated against influenza each year. The MenACWY vaccine should be given routinely at 12 months of age and in adolescence between ages 12 and 18 years. The recommendations for the MMR vaccine (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella vaccine (15 months and 3-4 years) also remain unchanged, using the MMRV vaccine for the second dose. Recommendations for the use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the paediatric age group will be updated periodically on the CAV-AEP website. The HPV vaccine is indicated in all adolescents, regardless of sex, at age 12 years. Novelties include the recommendation of routine administration of nirsevimab to neonates and infants aged less than 6 months for passive immunization against RSV, and the recommendations regarding the hexavalent vaccine are consolidated in a single section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - María José Cilleruelo Ortega
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María Garcés-Sánchez
- Centro de Salud Nazaret, Valencia, Spain; Área de Vacunas, FISABIO, Valencia, Spain
| | - Elisa Garrote Llanos
- Sección de Infectología, Hospital Universitario de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del País Vasco, UPV-EHU, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | | | - María Luisa Navarro Gómez
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Valentín Pineda Solas
- Sección de Infectología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli-Sabadell, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irene Rivero Calle
- Sección de Pediatría Clínica, Infectológica y Traslacional, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain; Grupo Genética, Vacunas, Infecciones y Pediatría (GENVIP), La Coruña, Spain
| | - Jesús Ruiz-Contreras
- Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Pediatría, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Álvarez García FJ, Cilleruelo Ortega MJ, Álvarez Aldeán J, Garcés-Sánchez M, Garrote Llanos E, Iofrío de Arce A, Montesdeoca Melián A, Navarro Gómez ML, Pineda Solas V, Rivero Calle I, Ruiz-Contreras J, Serrano Marchuet P. Calendario de inmunizaciones de la Asociación Española de Pediatría: recomendaciones 2023. An Pediatr (Barc) 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
7
|
Protecting the Offspring, the Gift of Maternal Immunization: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10111953. [DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy is characterized by immunological alterations in pregnant women that permit the growth of a semi-allogenic fetus, resulting in greater susceptibility of childbearing women to infections. Furthermore, due to the immaturity of the immune system of neonates, a protection gap is present in early life, leaving neonates and infants vulnerable to infectious diseases with increased morbidity and mortality. Maternal immunization against influenza, pertussis, and, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 has been implemented in several countries, with beneficial effects on both the mother and the offspring. The main protective mechanism of vaccination during pregnancy is transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies. However, recent evidence has implied that the fetal immune system may be influenced beyond passive immunity. This review sheds light on the current status of the routinely administered vaccinations during pregnancy, focusing on the impact of maternal immunization on the priming of the fetal immune system and suggesting future perspectives for the optimization of vaccination strategies.
Collapse
|