The safety of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To indirectly compare the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) by network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

Through August 1, 2023, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ICI-based treatment for R/M HNSCC. Outcomes of interest included overall and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Addis 16.5 software was used to perform NMA. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) was used to assess confidence in the evidence.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were included in this NMA, involving a total of 4016 patients. The general safety of ICI-based treatments in descending order was as follows: Durvalumab + Tremelimumab, Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy, Durvalumab, Toripalimab + Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab, Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy, Nivolumab, Tremelimumab. There were differences in the toxicity profile among Toripalimab + Chemotherapy (dermatologic irAEs), Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy (hypothyroidism), Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis), Pembrolizumab (nephrotoxicity), Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (colitis). ICI-based treatment increased the incidence of endocrine irAEs (hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism) and pneumonitis compared to conventional therapy. Besides, the combination of dual ICIs resulted in a greater occurrence of irAEs compared to the use of a single ICI.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety ranking of treatments based on ICIs is significantly influenced by specific irAEs. These irAEs, which vary in type and severity, play a crucial role in determining the overall safety profile of each ICI regimen.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023460267.

Treatment-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

This study comprehensively assesses the incidence and profiles of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies across cancer at various sites.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for trials investigating ICI-based therapies published between their inception and August 2023.

Results

In total, 147 studies involving 45,855 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, patients treated with ICIs reported 39.8% and 14.9% of all-grade and grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events (irAEs), respectively. The most common all-grade irAEs were dermatological and gastrointestinal issues, diarrhea, and pruritus, whereas patients who received ICIs showed most common grade ≥3 irAEs, including gastrointestinal events, diarrhea, increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase levels, and hepatic and dermatological events. The overall trAE incidence in patients treated with ICIs was 83.2% for all-grade trAEs and 38.2% for grade ≥3 trAEs. TrAE incidence was highest for patients treated with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitors for all-grade and grade ≥3 trAEs, with incidences of 86.4% and 39.2%, respectively. ICIs combined with targeted therapy showed the highest all-grade and grade ≥3 trAEs, with incidences of 96.3% and 59.4%, respectively. The most common all-grade trAEs were anemia, decrease in white blood cell count, decrease in neutrophil count, nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, and alopecia; patients who received ICIs presented relatively high incidences of grade ≥3 trAEs.

Conclusion

This study provided comprehensive data regarding irAEs and trAEs in patients receiving ICIs. These results should be applied in clinical practice to provide an essential reference for safety profiles of ICIs.

Systematic review registration

INPLASY platform, identifier INPLASY202380119.

Fever of unknown origin associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Since the approval for the treatment of melanoma in 2014, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the therapy pattern across various malignancies. Coinciding with their frequent usage, their adverse effects, including fever, cannot be neglected. In the context of cancer diseases and cancer treatments, fever of unknown origin (FUO), which has long posed a challenge for clinicians in terms of diagnosis and management, brings forth new connotation and significance. In this paper review, we present the concept of ICIs-associated FUO, consider activated immune system and elevated cytokines as common mechanisms by which ICIs induce fever and various immune-related adverse events (irAEs), summarize and compare the primary etiologies of ICI-associated FUO, and compare it with conventional types of FUO.

Drug conjugates for the treatment of lung cancer: from drug discovery to clinical practice

A drug conjugate consists of a cytotoxic drug bound via a linker to a targeted ligand, allowing the targeted delivery of the drug to one or more tumor sites. This approach simultaneously reduces drug toxicity and increases efficacy, with a powerful combination of efficient killing and precise targeting. Antibody‒drug conjugates (ADCs) are the best-known type of drug conjugate, combining the specificity of antibodies with the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce adverse reactions by preferentially targeting the payload to the tumor. The structure of ADCs has also provided inspiration for the development of additional drug conjugates. In recent years, drug conjugates such as ADCs, peptide‒drug conjugates (PDCs) and radionuclide drug conjugates (RDCs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The scope and application of drug conjugates have been expanding, including combination therapy and precise drug delivery, and a variety of new conjugation technology concepts have emerged. Additionally, new conjugation technology-based drugs have been developed in industry. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, drug conjugate therapy has undergone continuous development and made significant progress in treating lung cancer in recent years, offering a promising strategy for the treatment of this disease. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the use of drug conjugates for lung cancer treatment, including structure-based drug design, mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and side effects. Furthermore, challenges, potential approaches and future prospects are presented.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Perioperative Immunochemotherapeutic Strategies for Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this network meta-analysis was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of various immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from randomised controlled trials comparing perioperative ICI-chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone were acquired from the EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, PubMed, and meeting abstracts from inception until August 2023. The endpoints for this analysis were pathological complete response, event-free survival and treatment-related adverse events of any grade or adverse events of grade 3 or higher.

RESULTS

In total, six randomised controlled trials with 2538 NSCLC patients were selected for this network meta-analysis. Compared with other ICIs, toripalimab + chemotherapy demonstrated increased pathological complete response rates and prolonged event-free survival in NSCLC. In patients with negative/low PD-L1 expression or squamous cell pathology, toripalimab + chemotherapy was the most effective regimen. In contrast, nivolumab + chemotherapy was preferable for patients with high PD-L1 expression or non-squamous cell pathology. Among the analysed regimens, toripalimab + chemotherapy presented the highest risk of adverse events of any grade, whereas nivolumab + chemotherapy showed the highest risk of grade 3-4 adverse events. Conversely, durvalumab + chemotherapy exhibited the lowest risk of grade 3-4 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the evaluated perioperative immunochemotherapy regimens, toripalimab + chemotherapy indicated a significantly increased survival benefit for most resectable NSCLC patients. However, for high PD-L1 expression and non-squamous NSCLC patients, nivolumab + chemotherapy provided the most potent outcomes. Perioperative durvalumab + chemotherapy is a relatively safe treatment. The findings of this investigation are expected to assist clinicians in making informed decisions among promising treatment options.

Isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency following immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment often occurs in polyglandular endocrinopathies

BACKGROUND

With the increasing application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer therapy, the occurrence of isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency (IAD), as an adverse effect, is also on the rise. Nevertheless, there are only a few studies regarding IAD induced by ICI. This study aimed at investigating the characteristics of IAD induced by ICI and its relationship with other endocrine adverse events.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in the Endocrinology Department from January 2019 to August 2022 to investigate characteristics of patients with IAD. Clinical features, laboratory findings and treatment information were collected. All patients underwent a follow-up of 3-6-month.

RESULTS

28 patients with IAD were enrolled. All patients received treatment with anti-PD-1/ PD-L1. The median occurrence time of IAD was 24 (18-39) weeks after initiation of ICI treatment. Over half of the patients (53.5%) had an additional endocrinopathy, including primary hypothyroidism and fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (FT1DM), while other types of endocrinopathies were not identified. The interval between the occurrences of two gland damages was between 4 and 21 weeks or simultaneous. Primary hypothyroidism (46.4%) was more prevalent than FT1DM (7.1%). Fatigue and nausea were common symptoms, with a frequent occurrence of hyponatremia. All patients continued on oral glucocorticoids during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

IAD induced by ICI could manifest independently, or more frequently in combination with hypothyroidism or FT1DM. This damage could happen at any point of ICI treatment. Given that IAD can be life-threatening, it is critical to evaluate pituitary function dynamically in patients undergoing immunotherapy.