New Insights into Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Pathophysiology

Penicillin Allergy: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management

Allergy to penicillin can occur via any of the 4 types of Gel-Coombs hypersensitivity reactions, producing distinct clinical histories and physical examination findings. Treatments include penicillin discontinuation, and depending on the type of reaction, epinephrine, antihistamines, and/or glucocorticoids. Most beta-lactams may be safely used in penicillin-allergic patients, with the possible exception of first-generation and second-generation cephalosporins. Penicillin testing includes skin testing, patch testing, and graded challenge. The selection of the type of testing depends on the clinical setting, equipment availability, and type of hypersensitivity reaction. Desensitization may be used in some cases where treatment with penicillins is essential.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Immuno-inflammatory in vitro hepatotoxicity models to assess side effects of biologicals exemplified by aldesleukin

Introduction

Hepatotoxicity induced by immunotherapeutics is an appearing cause for immune-mediated drug-induced liver injury. Such immuno-toxic mechanisms are difficult to assess using current preclinical models and the incidence is too low to detect in clinical trials. As hepatotoxicity is a frequent reason for post-authorisation drug withdrawal, there is an urgent need for immuno-inflammatory in vitro models to assess the hepatotoxic potential of immuno-modulatory drug candidates. We developed several immuno-inflammatory hepatotoxicity test systems based on recombinant human interleukin-2 (aldesleukin).

Methods

Co-culture models of primary human CD8+ T cells or NK cells with the hepatocyte cell line HepaRG were established and validated with primary human hepatocytes (PHHs). Subsequently, the HepaRG model was refined by increasing complexity by inclusion of monocyte-derived macrophages (MdMs). The main readouts were cytotoxicity, inflammatory mediator release, surface marker expression and specific hepatocyte functions.

Results

We identified CD8+ T cells as possible mediators of aldesleukin-mediated hepatotoxicity, with MdMs being implicated in increased aldesleukin-induced inflammatory effects. In co-cultures of CD8+ T cells with MdMs and HepaRG cells, cytotoxicity was induced at intermediate/high aldesleukin concentrations and perforin was upregulated. A pro-inflammatory milieu was created measured by interleukin-6 (IL-6), c-reactive protein (CRP), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) increase. NK cells responded to aldesleukin, however, only minor aldesleukin-induced cytotoxic effects were measured in co-cultures. Results obtained with HepaRG cells and with PHHs were comparable, especially regarding cytotoxicity, but high inter-donor variations limited meaningfulness of the PHH model.

Discussion

The in vitro test systems developed contribute to the understanding of potential key mechanisms in aldesleukin-mediated hepatotoxicity. In addition, they may aid assessment of immune-mediated hepatotoxicity during the development of novel immunotherapeutics.

Renal Manifestations of Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome: A Systematic Review of 71 Cases

Unlike other adverse drug reactions, visceral organ involvement is a prominent feature of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome and correlates with mortality. The aim of this study was to systematically review cases published in PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed journals in which patients had renal injury during the episode of DRESS syndrome (DS). We found 71 cases, of which 67 were adults and 56% were males. Female sex was associated with higher mortality. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present in 14% of patients who developed acute kidney injury (AKI) during DS. In 21% of cases, the kidneys were the only visceral organ involved, while 54% of patients had both liver and kidney involvement. Eosinophilia was absent in 24% of patients. The most common classes of medication associated with renal injury in DS were antibiotics in 34%, xanthine oxidase inhibitors in 15%, and anticonvulsants in 11%. Among antibiotics, vancomycin was the most common culprit in 68% of patients. AKI was the most common renal manifestation reported in 96% of cases, while isolated proteinuria or hematuria was present in only 4% of cases. In cases with AKI, 88% had isolated increase in creatinine and decrease in glomerular filtration (GFR), 27% had AKI concomitantly with proteinuria, 18% had oliguria, and 13% had concomitant AKI with hematuria. Anuria was the rarest manifestation, occurring in only 4% of patients with DS. Temporary renal replacement therapy was needed in 30% of cases, and all but one patient fully recovered renal function. Mortality of DS in this cohort was 13%, which is higher than previously reported. Medication class, latency period, or pre-existing CKD were not found to be associated with higher mortality. More research, particularly prospective studies, is needed to better recognize the risks associated with renal injury in patients with DS. The development of disease-specific biomarkers would also be useful so DS with renal involvement can be easier distinguished from other eosinophilic diseases that might affect the kidney.

Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a potentially life-threatening drug reaction; recognizing the diversity of its clinical presentations, implicated drugs, and management modalities can aid in diagnosis and reduce morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical features, drug causes, and treatments deployed in DRESS.

METHODS

This review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to review publications relating to DRESS published between 1979 and 2021. Only publications with a RegiSCAR score of 4 or greater were included (indicating "probable" or "definite" DRESS). The PRISMA guidelines were used for data extraction and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for quality assessment (Pierson DJ. Respir Care 2009;54:1372-8). The main outcomes included implicated drugs, patient demographics, clinical manifestations, treatment, and sequelae for each included publication.

RESULTS

A total of 1124 publications were reviewed, and 131 met the inclusion criteria, amounting to 151 cases of DRESS. The most implicated drug classes were antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and anti-inflammatories, although up to 55 drugs were implicated. Cutaneous manifestations were present in 99% of cases, with a median onset of 24 days and maculopapular rash the most common morphology. Common systemic features were fever, eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, and liver involvement. Facial edema was present in 67 cases (44%). Systemic corticosteroids were the mainstay of DRESS-specific treatment. A total of 13 cases (9%) resulted in mortality.

CONCLUSION

DRESS diagnosis should be considered in the presence of a cutaneous eruption, fever, eosinophilia, liver involvement, and lymphadenopathy. The class of implicated drug may influence outcome, as allopurinol was associated with 23% of cases that resulted in death (3 cases). Given potential DRESS complications and mortality, it is important that DRESS is recognized early so that any suspect drugs are ceased promptly.

DRESS, the maverick among SCARS: A case series-based review of literature

DRESS is a potentially life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR). Historically, it was most frequently linked with phenytoin and was initially described as phenytoin hypersensitivity syndrome; however, it was later found to be caused by various other medications, with the commonest been aromatic anticonvulsants, allopurinol and sulfonamides. The severity of this entity is related to systemic involvement, which can result in multiorgan failure and death. The diagnosis of DRESS, especially in the early stages, remains challenging and elusive due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation and the complex course of the disease with different patterns depending on the causal drug. The most important step in the management of DRESS is early diagnosis and immediate cessation of the suspected offending drug along with oral steroids or immunosuppressants to control the disease. We describe the varying presentation and management of six adults with DRESS from a tertiary care hospital, observed over a two-year period with a brief review of the literature.

Penicillin Allergy

Allergy to penicillin can occur via any of the 4 types of Gel-Coombs hypersensitivity reactions, producing distinct clinical histories and physical examination findings. Treatments include penicillin discontinuation, and depending on the type of reaction, epinephrine, antihistamines, and/or glucocorticoids. Most beta-lactams may be safely used in penicillin-allergic patients, with the possible exception of first-generation and second-generation cephalosporins. Penicillin testing includes skin testing, patch testing, and graded challenge. The selection of the type of testing depends on the clinical setting, equipment availability, and type of hypersensitivity reaction. Desensitization may be used in some cases where treatment with penicillins is essential.

Novel targeted inhibition of the IL-5 axis for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome

Background

The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome represents a severe hypersensitivity reaction. Up-to-date treatment is based on withdrawal of medication, supportive care, and immunosuppression using high-dose corticosteroid (CS) therapy. However, evidence-based data are lacking regarding second-line therapy for steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent patients.

Objectives

We hypothesize that the interleukin (IL)-5 axis plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of DRESS; hence, inhibition of this signaling pathway could offer a potential therapy for steroid-dependent and/or steroid-resistant cases, and it may offer an alternative to CS therapy in certain patients more prone to CS toxicity.

Methods

Herein, we collected worldwide data on DRESS cases treated with biological agents targeting the IL-5 axis. We reviewed all cases indexed in PubMed up to October 2022 and performed a total analysis including our center experience with two additional novel cases.

Results

A review of the literature yielded 14 patients with DRESS who were treated with biological agents targeting the IL-5 axis as well as our two new cases. Reported patients are characterized by a female-to-male ratio of 1:1 and a mean age of 51.8 (17-87) years. The DRESS-inducing drugs, as expected from the prospective RegiSCAR study, were mostly antibiotics (7/16), as follows: vancomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefepime. DRESS patients were treated with anti-IL-5 agents (mepolizumab and reslizumab) or anti-IL-5 receptor (IL-5R) biologics (benralizumab). All patients have clinically improved under anti-IL-5/IL-5R biologics. Multiple doses of mepolizumab were needed to achieve clinical resolution, whereas a single dose of benralizumab was often sufficient. Relapse was noted in one patient receiving benralizumab treatment. One patient receiving benralizumab had a fatal outcome, although mortality was probably related to massive bleeding and cardiac arrest due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection.

Conclusion

Current treatment guidelines for DRESS are based on case reports and expert opinion. Understanding the central role of eosinophils in DRESS pathogenicity emphasizes the need for future implementation of IL-5 axis blockade as steroid-sparing agents, potential therapy to steroid-resistant cases, and perhaps an alternative to CS treatment in certain DRESS patients more prone to CS toxicity.

A Case of Primary Epstein-Barr Virus Infection Masquerading As Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms

In this case report, we discuss the diagnostic dilemma presented by a patient admitted for elevated liver enzymes and rash, who had a history of recent amoxicillin use. This presentation initially appeared to fit the criteria for Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. However, histologic evaluation determined the rash was consistent with Miliaria rubra rather than the lymphocytic infiltrate of DRESS. This necessitated broad diagnostic testing to determine the underlying etiology of the patient's syndrome. Serology subsequently demonstrated primary Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection, which explained her acute liver injury. Her eosinophilia was potentially related to an allergic reaction to surgical tape but was never definitely diagnosed. This case demonstrates the importance of maintaining a wide differential even when clinical diagnostic criteria are apparently met.

Clair B. Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Associated With High-Dose Lamotrigine for Mood Disorders: A Case Series

Drug-induced Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life-threatening immune-mediated drug reactions known as Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (SCARs). These severe drug reactions have been associated with many commonly prescribed medications, including sulfonamides, allopurinol, carbamazepine, and several antiepileptic drugs including lamotrigine.¹ Although the risk of these adverse events is recognized by many medical providers, the risk may be overlooked when prescribing lamotrigine for mood disorders. Review of the literature and the experience of these cases suggest that the risk of lamotrigine-associated SCARs is increased when starting lamotrigine at high initial doses. Here we present and discuss two cases of SCARs attributed to high-dose lamotrigine prescribed for mood disorders. A third patient also presented with a SCAR related to high-dose lamotrigine prescribed for a mood disorder during this time but was lost to follow-up and was not reachable. All three patients presented to our hospital system from 2019-2020. Due to this clinical experience, we recommend that pharmacists and prescribers alike be alerted of the risk of severe cutaneous drug reactions when lamotrigine is prescribed, particularly at initial doses greater than 25 mg.

Development and initial validation of a modified lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) assay in patients with DRESS and AGEP

Background

The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is an in vitro assay used to diagnose drug induced hypersensitivity reactions by detecting the activation and expansion of drug-specific memory T cells to the suspected implicated drug. Traditionally radiolabelled thymidine (3H-thymidine) has been used but requires the handling and disposal of radioactive materials.

Objective

To examine safe alternatives to 3H-thymidine, test assay modifications for improved assay sensitivity and evaluate the modified LTT in patients with DRESS and AGEP.

Methods

Four proliferation detection assays (BRDU, CyQUANT™, MTT and XTT) were screened for LTT sensitivity. XTT the most sensitive and practical was selected for further evaluation Modifications like autologous serum (AS) and regulatory T cell depletion (T-REG) were tested for improved assay sensitivity. Finally, an initial evaluation of the XTT–LTT was performed in 8 patients with DRESS and 2 with AGEP including cytokine testing.

Results

Of the non-radioactive alternatives we tested, XTT a colorimetric assay was the most sensitive and practical to move to evaluation. The addition of AS increased background signal. Depletion of T-REGs improved sensitivity but cell sorting time and risk of contamination limited benefit.

Of eight patients diagnosed with DRESS and 2 with AGEP tested with XTT–LTT assay results showed our assay matched clinical findings of implicated drugs in 8/10 patients when using a stimulation index (SI) ≥ 2 and 8/10 with analysis by ANOVA. All ten patients were correctly diagnosed by either analysis.

Conclusion

XTT appears to be a safe, viable alternative to 3H-thymidine, with high sensitivity and allowing direct cytokine quantification on specific patient cells.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome with high procalcitonin levels due to piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem: A case report

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and life-threatening adverse drug reaction. It is characterized by a long latency period with rash, hematological abnormalities, and visceral damage. Clinical manifestations of DRESS vary. Thus, accurate clinical diagnosis and identification are essential to ensure timely treatment commencement for improving prognosis and speeding up recovery. We report the case of a 66-year-old male patient with a drug reaction induced by a beta-lactam antibiotic, piperacillin/tazobactam (Pip/Taz). This resulted in the manifestation of both eosinophilic and systemic symptoms. Ten days after the Pip/Taz treatment commencement, the patient developed hyperthermia and elevated serum procalcitonin (PCT), leading to a misdiagnosis of an exacerbated infection. Meropenem treatment was then started. However, after 72 h, the patient developed a generalized rash, eosinophilia, hematological abnormalities, and visceral damage. Moreover, PCT levels were significantly elevated. All these symptoms were associated with DRESS. The sensitizing drug was discontinued, and glucocorticoids were administered, resulting in gradual subsiding of symptoms and decreases in serum PCT levels. Clinicians should be aware that elevated PCT serum levels may be a diagnostic biomarker for DRESS, which requires specific treatment. Furthermore, studies are warranted to further evaluate and elucidate the role of PCT in response to DRESS.

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome masquerading as a lymphoproliferative disorder in a young adult on immunosuppressive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a case report

Background

This case reveals a novel presentation of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome that mimics a lymphoproliferative disorder. The heterogeneous clinical presentation of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome gives rise to a broad differential diagnosis that includes a multitude of infectious, inflammatory, and autoimmune conditions. This patient was diagnosed with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome 4 weeks after starting sulfasalazine and 5 weeks after starting hydroxychloroquine for rheumatoid arthritis. Both of these medications have been shown to cause drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome, albeit more rarely in the context of hydroxychloroquine. This patient’s history, physical examination, and workup illuminate a case of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome that masquerades as a lymphoproliferative disorder despite its adherence to the RegiSCAR criteria.

Case presentation

A 22-year-old African-American female with an atopic history and rheumatoid arthritis presented for evaluation of a rash, unremitting fevers, and syncope. She was found to have drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome. A syncope workup was unremarkable. Computed tomography of the chest/abdomen/pelvis confirmed extensive lymphadenopathy and revealed a small right pleural effusion (Fig. 5). These imaging findings accompanied by fevers and a rash in the setting of eosinophilia, leukocytosis, and transaminitis led to the clinical suspicion for drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome. Steroids were subsequently initiated. Broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was implemented to cover for possible skin/soft tissue infection due to initial paradoxical worsening after discontinuation of the culprit drugs. Lymph node biopsy ruled out a lymphoproliferative disorder and instead demonstrated necrotizing lymphadenitis. An extensive infectious and autoimmune workup was noncontributory. Clinical improvement was visualized, antibiotics were discontinued, and she was discharged on a steroid taper.

Conclusion

This case reflects how drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome can masquerade as a lymphoproliferative disorder. Additionally, it highlights the extent to which rapid identification and treatment optimized the patient’s outcome. It calls into question how immunogenetics may factor into a patient’s susceptibility to acquire drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome. This case is unique because of the early onset of visceral organ involvement, the type of internal organ involvement, the hematopoietic features, and the lymphadenopathy associated with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.

Drug hypersensitivity syndrome induced by sulfasalazine: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Drug hypersensitivity syndrome (DHS) induced by sulfasalazine is a serious systemic delayed adverse drug reaction, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 52-year-old man was hospitalized for developing a rash after 3 weeks of sulfasalazine treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC).

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with DHS based on his drug history, clinical manifestations, and laboratory test results.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was administered intravenous glucocorticoids. The patient's condition improved after treatment with human immunoglobulin and antihistamines.

OUTCOMES

Combination therapy of glucocorticoid and gamma globulin, the whole-body pruritus disappeared, and no new rash appeared. The whole-body rash subsided or turned dark red.

CONCLUSION

This article describes the diagnosis and treatment process of a case of sulfasalazine-induced DHS and reviews the relevant literature to improve clinician understanding and avoid misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.

The Conundrum of Lung Disease and Drug Hypersensitivity-like Reactions in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

An unusual form of lung disease has begun to affect some children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), coincident with increasing utilization of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6 antagonists. Many children with systemic JIA-associated lung disease (SJIA-LD) have a history of clinical and laboratory features resembling drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), a presentation now convincingly associated with HLA-DRB1*15. Treatment of DRESS typically requires drug discontinuation, a daunting prospect for clinicians and families who rely upon these agents. Here we review SJIA-LD and its associated DRESS-like phenotype. We suggest an alternative explanation, the cytokine plasticity hypothesis, proposing that IL-1 and IL-6 blockers modulate the milieu in which T cells develop, leading to a pathologic immune response triggered through exposure to common microbes, or to other exogenous or endogenous antigens, rather than to the drugs themselves. This hypothesis differs from DRESS in mechanism but also in clinical implications, predicting that control of pathogenic T cells could permit continued use of IL-1 and IL-6 antagonists in some individuals. The spectrum posed by these two hypotheses provides a conceptual framework that will guide investigation into the pathogenesis of SJIA-LD and may open up new therapeutic avenues for patients with systemic JIA.

The regulatory role of eosinophils in viral, bacterial, and fungal infections

Eosinophils are innate immune cells typically associated with allergic and parasitic diseases. However, in recent years, eosinophils have also been ascribed a role in keeping homeostasis and in fighting several infectious diseases. Indeed, these cells circulate as mature cells in the blood and can be quickly recruited to the infected tissue. Moreover, eosinophils have all the necessary cellular equipment such as pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), pro-inflammatory cytokines, anti-bacterial proteins, and DNA traps to fight pathogens and promote an efficient immune response. This review summarizes some of the updated information on the role of eosinophils' direct and indirect mediated interactions with pathogens.

Serum proteome analysis of systemic JIA and related lung disease identifies distinct inflammatory programs and biomarkers

OBJECTIVES

Recent observations in systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) suggest an increasing incidence of high-mortality interstitial lung disease (sJIA-LD) often characterized by a variant of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP). Co-occurrence of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and PAP in sJIA suggested a shared pathology, but sJIA-LD patients also commonly experience features of drug reaction such as atypical rashes and eosinophilia. We sought to investigate immunopathology and identify biomarkers in sJIA, MAS, and sJIA-LD.

METHODS

We used SOMAscan to measure >1300 analytes in sera from healthy controls and patients with sJIA, MAS, sJIA-LD and other related diseases. We verified selected findings by ELISA and lung immunostaining. Because the proteome of a sample may reflect multiple states (sJIA, MAS, sJIA-LD), we used regression modeling to identify subsets of altered proteins associated with each state. We tested key findings in a validation cohort.

RESULTS

Proteome alterations in active sJIA and MAS overlapped substantially, including known sJIA biomarkers like SAA and S100A9, and novel elevations of heat shock proteins and glycolytic enzymes. IL-18 was elevated in all sJIA groups, particularly MAS and sJIA-LD. We also identified an MAS-independent sJIA-LD signature notable for elevated ICAM5, MMP7, and allergic/eosinophilic chemokines, which have been previously associated with lung damage. Immunohistochemistry localized ICAM5 and MMP7 in sJIA-LD lung. ICAM5's ability to distinguish sJIA-LD from sJIA/MAS was independently validated.

CONCLUSION

Serum proteins support an sJIA-to-MAS continuum, help distinguish sJIA, sJIA/MAS, and sJIA-LD and suggest etiologic hypotheses. Select biomarkers, such as ICAM5, could aid in early detection and management of sJIA-LD.

Inflammatory complications of CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a case series

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is expressed throughout the body and is a known mediator of migraine, exerting this biological effect through activation of trigeminovascular, meningeal and associated neuronal pathways located in close proximity to the central nervous system. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the CGRP pathway are an effective new preventive treatment for migraine, with a generally favourable adverse event profile. Pre-clinical evidence supports an anti-inflammatory/immunoregulatory role for CGRP in other organ systems, and therefore inhibition of the normal action of this peptide may promote a pro-inflammatory response.

CASES

We present a case series of eight patients with new or significantly worsened inflammatory pathology in close temporal association with the commencement of CGRP mAb therapy.

CONCLUSION

This case series provides novel insights on the potential molecular mechanisms and side-effects of CGRP antagonism in migraine and supports clinical vigilance in patient care going forward.

Eosinophils in skin diseases

Eosinophil infiltration is a common finding in a broad spectrum of skin diseases, despite the fact that the skin is devoid of eosinophils under physiologic conditions. Although cutaneous eosinophilia is reactive, cytokine-mediated in most cases, diseases with an intrinsic mutation-mediated clonal expansion of eosinophils can also manifest on the skin. As eosinophils are involved in host defense, regulate immune responses, generate pruritus, induce remodeling and fibrosis, and can cause tissue damage, they have the capacity to actively contribute to the pathogenesis of diseases. Recent research provided deeper insights in the mechanisms, e.g., bacterial and viral clearance, blister formation, recruitment of cytotoxic T cells, and generation of pruritus, by which eosinophils might come into action. This review aims at providing an overview on the clinical presentations of eosinophil-associated dermatoses and the current understanding of their pathogenic role in these diseases. Further, we discuss the effects of therapies targeting eosinophils.

Quality of Life of Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptom (DRESS) and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and/or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) Patients

PURPOSE

Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptom (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) are acute hypersensitivity reactions with the potential to reduce the quality of life of exposed individuals. This study aims to determine the quality of life of patients suffering from DRESS, SJS, SJS/TEN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional approach was used to get the quality of life data from DRESS, SJS, and/or TEN patients at Dr. Sardjito general hospital, Yogyakarta. The utility index and VAS score differences of EQ-5D-5L were analyzed based on the diagnosis.

RESULTS

We recruited 58 patients. Most of the patients were female (63%). The mean value of utility index was 0.61, 0.08 and 0.03 for DRESS, SJS and SJS/TEN patients, respectively (p value <0.01). Furthermore, the mean of VAS score was 73.36, 57.93 and 50.00 for DRESS, SJS and SJS/TEN patients, respectively (p value <0.01).

CONCLUSION

In general, the quality of life of DRESS patients is better than the quality of life of SJS and/or TEN patients.

Severe DRESS syndrome after carbamazepine intake in a case with multiple addictions: A case report

A case is presented of a male with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome induced by carbamazepine intake. The patient presented all the elements of DRESS syndrome: Skin reaction, fever, enlargement of the lymph nodes, increased eosinophils and lymphocytes, with associated organ dysfunctions. The patient was admitted with acute laryngeal edema and imminence of respiratory insufficiency. The escalation of symptoms for this syndrome is typical, even after the administering of the the culprit medicine has ceased. However, in this case, the most difficult aspect was the complex treatment scheme prior to admission. All medical compounds involved in the background treatment were substituted with other substances in order to control the immune response. Current knowledge regarding DRESS is reviewed and possible influence of various etiologies over the present case are discussed. Clinicians should be aware of this rare situation with life-threatening potential. We benefited from the advantage of reuniting the knowledge of a complex team of experts from various tertiary emergency units in Romania.

Targeted therapy guided by single-cell transcriptomic analysis in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome: a case report

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DiHS/DRESS) is a potentially fatal multiorgan inflammatory disease associated with herpesvirus reactivation and subsequent onset of autoimmune diseases1-4. Pathophysiology remains elusive and therapeutic options are limited. Cases refractory to corticosteroid therapy pose a clinical challenge1,5 and approximately 30% of patients with DiHS/DRESS develop complications, including infections and inflammatory and autoimmune diseases1,2,5. Progress in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) provides an opportunity to dissect human disease pathophysiology at unprecedented resolutions6, particularly in diseases lacking animal models, such as DiHS/DRESS. We performed scRNA-seq on skin and blood from a patient with refractory DiHS/DRESS, identifying the JAK-STAT signaling pathway as a potential target. We further showed that central memory CD4+ T cells were enriched with DNA from human herpesvirus 6b. Intervention via tofacitinib enabled disease control and tapering of other immunosuppressive agents. Tofacitinib, as well as antiviral agents, suppressed culprit-induced T cell proliferation in vitro, further supporting the roles of the JAK-STAT pathway and herpesviruses in mediating the adverse drug reaction. Thus, scRNA-seq analyses guided successful therapeutic intervention in the patient with refractory DiHS/DRESS. scRNA-seq may improve our understanding of complicated human disease pathophysiology and provide an alternative approach in personalized medicine.

Fulminant Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Caused by Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is a rare, severe cutaneous adverse drug reaction characterized by fever, skin rashes, lymphadenopathy, leukocytosis with eosinophilia, and/or atypical lymphocytosis, and multiple visceral organ involvement. Moreover, patients with DRESS are at risk of developing autoimmune diseases including thyroiditis, diabetes mellitus (DM), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), etc. several weeks or months after the initial resolution. We described a 9-month boy who was admitted to our hospital because of severe pneumonia and developed DRESS 3 weeks later. After the withdrawal of suspicious drug and administration of systemic corticosteroids, the patient's condition improved gradually. Nevertheless, hyperglycemia was detected 20 days after the initial onset of DRESS, and subsequent fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (F1DM) was diagnosed requiring continuous intravenous insulin infusion. After 13 months of follow-up, the blood glucose levels are now well-controlled. Literature research in PubMed for diabetes mellitus associated with DRESS showed 16 articles and 27 related case reports. Of 27 patients with DM related to DRESS, 11 were male, 16 were female. The mean age was 46 years. The duration from the onset of DRESS to the development of DM was 21 days on average. F1DM was diagnosed in 21 patients, T1DM was confirmed in 5 patients, and T2DM was only defined in 1 patient. Glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GAD) were detected in 4 cases. Of 22 cases in which virus examination was carried out, evidence of virus reactivation was established in 16 cases (72.7%). Of patients with F1DM, 16 (88.9%) cases were evidenced by reactivation of herpes virus. A high frequency of HLA genotype and haplotype were found in 11 cases. DM was concomitant with acute pancreatitis in 3 patients and thyroiditis in 2 patients. No patients died from the disease. This work aims to raise awareness of long-term autoimmune sequelae in patients with DRESS.

[Lamotrigine induced hypersensitivity syndrome in children: a case report]

Drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is often manifested as severe systemic drug trans-reactions characterized by acute and extensive skin lesions (mostly measles-like rash), fever, enlargement of lymph nodes, multiple organ involvement (hepatitis, nephritis, and pneumonia), eosinophilia and mononucleosis,within 2-6 weeks of the application of sensitizing drugs. In the early stage of the lesion, macular papules or erythema multiforme were common, and in severe cases, exfoliative dermatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis were also common. Most of them developed after taking allergic drugs for 2-6 weeks (average: 3 weeks). Symptoms persisted after discontinuation of allergic drugs. It takes more than one month to alleviate, which may endanger life in severe cases. Documents report that the most common drugs causing DIHS are phenytoin sodium, carbamazepine and phenobarbital aromatic drugs. However, it was reported that phenobarbital sodium was the most common anticonvulsant among allergenic drugs in children, followed by antipyretics, analgesics and antibiotics, which may be related to the spectrum of childhood diseases and the particularity of the drug. Lamotrigine has been reported to cause DIHS in adults in China, but less in children. In order to improve the understanding of clinical diagnosis and treatment of DIHS in children, reduce misdiagnosis, missed diagnosis, and untimely treatment, and prevent the aggravation of the disease, we studied the case of a 4-year-old 7-month-old girl who presented with systemic erythematous papules, fever, hepatosplenomegaly, marked increase of white blood cells, marked decrease of anemia and platelets, abnormal liver function and coagulation routine after taking lamotrigine for one month due to epilepsy seizures. Now, according to the DIHS diagnostic criteria established by Registration of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Drug Review Group in 2007, plasma exchange was immediately given to replace the toxic metabolites in hemorrhagic plasma, and methylprednisolone was given intravenously for three days. At the same time, after symptomatic supportive treatments, such as loratadine and albumin, the condition gradually improved without recurrence. Through a case report of Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in a child caused by lamotrigine, we can strengthen our understanding and improve the level of diagnosis and treatment of drug hypersensitivity syndrome in children. Lamotrigine can cause DIHS in children, which is very dangerous. Early diagnosis and early withdrawal of allergenic drugs, plasma exchange and glucocorticoid therapy are the key to treatment.

Targeting the Interleukin-5 Pathway for Treatment of Eosinophilic Conditions Other than Asthma

Improved understanding of the contribution of eosinophils to various chronic inflammatory conditions, most notably allergic asthma, has encouraged development of monoclonal antibodies specifically targeting mediators and surface receptors involved in eosinophil expansion and activation. The pivotal role of interleukin-5 (IL-5) in eosinophil biology, its high specificity for this leukocyte subset, and its involvement in the majority of eosinophilic conditions make it a very enticing target for treatment of eosinophil-mediated disorders. Two types of antibodies have been developed to target eosinophils: antibodies against IL-5 (mepolizumab and reslizumab), and an antibody against the IL-5-receptor-alpha-chain (IL-5Rα) (benralizumab). Both types of antibodies prevent IL-5 from engaging its receptor and in addition, anti-IL-5Rα antibodies induce target-cell lysis. They have been shown to reduce circulating eosinophil counts rapidly in humans with various disorders. Herein, a brief overview of the role of IL-5 in eosinophil biology will be presented, followed by a description of the development and characteristics of antibodies targeting IL-5 or its receptor. Results of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of these new antibodies in diseases (other than eosinophilic asthma) with prominent tissue eosinophilia are reviewed, followed by safety considerations and potential future applications.