Association of Hospitalised Infection With Socioeconomic Status in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Biologics or Tofacitinib: A Population-Based Cohort Study

A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.

Factors associated with mental illness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis initiating b/ts DMARDs: A population-based study

AIM

Mental health is an essential issue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but remains unclear among those receiving biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). We aim to assess the incidence and factors associated with mental illness among patients with RA who underwent b/tsDMARD therapy.

METHOD

We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2001-2020 to identify patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs. The primary outcome was newly developed mental illness, including anxiety and mood disorders. We performed a Cox regression analysis to determine factors associated with mental illness and presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We enrolled 10 852 patients, with 7854 patients receiving tumor necrosis factors inhibitors (TNFi), 1693 patients receiving non-TNFi bDMARDs, and 1305 patients treated with tsDMARD. We found that 13.62% of enrolled patients developed mental illness, with an incidence rate of 4054 per 100 000 person-year. Those receiving tocilizumab (aHR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.51-0.82), abatacept (aHR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55-0.86), or tsDMARDs (aHR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.73) had a lower risk of mental illness compared with those receiving TNFi. We also found that old age, low income, diabetes mellitus, use of cyclosporine, and use of steroids were associated with incident mental illness.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study investigated the incidence and factors associated with mental illness among patients with RA receiving b/tsDMARDs. Our findings highlight the need for vigilance with respect to the possibility of mental illness in patients with RA.

Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic(s) and biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

SLR of observational studies comparing safety outcomes of any DMARD with another intervention in RA. A comparator group was required for inclusion. For treatments yet without, or limited, registry data, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine observational studies addressed the safety of DMARDs. Two studies (unclear risk of bias (RoB)) showed an increased risk of serious infections with bDMARDs compared with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. Herpes zoster infections occurred more with JAKi than csDMARDs (adjusted HR (aHR): 3.66) and bDMARDs (aHR: 1.9-2.3) (four studies, two low RoB). The risk of malignancies was similar across bDMARDs (five studies) and with tofacitinib compared with bDMARDs (one study, low RoB). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar with bDMARDs and tofacitinib (two studies, one low RoB). Thirty studies reported safety from RCTs, with one, designed to evaluate safety, showing that malignancies (HR (95% CI): 1.48 (1.04 to 2.09)) and MACE (HR (95% CI): 1.33 (0.91 to 1.94)) occurred numerically more frequently with tofacitinib (5 mg and 10 mg doses combined) than with TNFi in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. In this study, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg than with TNFi.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of bDMARDs was further demonstrated. Whether the difference in incidence of malignancies, MACE and VTE between tofacitinib and TNFi applies to other JAKi needs further evaluation.

Mechanisms of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor-Induced Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus induced by biologics mainly results from tumor necrosis factor-alpha remains unclear. The objectives of the study were to investigate the mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced systemic lupus erythematosus. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from thirteen psoriasis patients were cultured and treated with the following: untreated control, Streptococcus pyogenes with or without different biologics. The supernatants were collected for cytokines assay. Analysis of cytokine expression revealed that IL-2 and IL-10 levels decreased only in the TNF-α inhibitor-treated groups but not in the groups treated with biologics involving IL-17, IL-12/IL-23 or IL-23 inhibitor mechanisms (p < 0.001, p < 0.05). The IFN-γ/IL-13 ratio increased significantly in patients with SLE inducing biologics to S. pyogenes induction only compared with non-SLE inducing biologics to S. pyogenes induction only (p = 0.001). IL-2 and IL-10 depletion and a shift to the Th-1 pathway in the innate response are the correlated mechanism for tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced systemic lupus erythematosus.

Risk of Severe Infection among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Biological DMARDs: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are widely used for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, although their benefits are counterweight by an increased risk of infections. In the present study, we used administrative data to compare the risk of severe infections among different classes of bDMARDs. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Administrative Health Databases of the Piedmont Region, Italy. Relevant data were obtained from: (1) the inhabitants registry, (2) hospital discharge records, and (3) the co-payment exemption registry and (4) drug claims registry. Fine and Gray competing risk models were fitted to evaluate the association between the use of different types of bDMARDs and occurrence of severe infection accounting for treatment interruption as competing risk. A total of 1780 new users of bDMARDs were identified. Among them, 50 hospitalizations for infection occurred during the study period. The use of Tocilizumab was associated with an increased risk of infection, compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor drugs (sub-distribution hazard ratios-sHR: 2.510; 95% CI: 1.279–4.926), whereas no difference in the risk of severe infection was found for abatacept (sHR: 0.584; 95% CI: 0.234–1.457). bDMARDs treatment is generally safe in clinical practice with slight but important differences among classes. The increased risk of infection associated with tocilizumab use should be taken into account when balancing the risk and benefits of starting a treatment with this drug.